Next Article in Journal
Gluten-Free Bread with Cricket Powder—Mechanical Properties and Molecular Water Dynamics in Dough and Ready Product
Next Article in Special Issue
Emulsifiers from Partially Composted Olive Waste
Previous Article in Journal
Estimation of Minced Pork Microbiological Spoilage through Fourier Transform Infrared and Visible Spectroscopy and Multispectral Vision Technology
Previous Article in Special Issue
Utilization of Clarified Butter Sediment Waste as a Feedstock for Cost-Effective Production of Biodiesel
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 8
Issue 7
10.3390/foods8070239
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of Biomass and Chitin Production of Morchella Mushrooms Grown on Starch-Based Substrates

by
Aikaterini Papadaki
1,2,*,
Panagiota Diamantopoulou
2,
Seraphim Papanikolaou
1 and
Antonios Philippoussis
2,†
1
Laboratory of Edible Fungi, Institute of Technology of Agricultural Products (ITAP), Hellenic Agricultural Organization - Demeter, 1 Sofokli Venizelou Street, 14123 -Lykovryssi, 14123 Attiki, Greece
2
Department of Food Science & Technology, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 11855 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Dedicated to his memory.
Foods 2019, 8(7), 239; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8070239
Submission received: 12 June 2019 / Revised: 27 June 2019 / Accepted: 28 June 2019 / Published: 1 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Food and By-Products Processing Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Morchella sp. is one of the most expensive mushrooms with a high nutritional profile. In this study, the polysaccharide content of Morchella species was investigated. Specifically, mycelium growth rate, biomass production, sclerotia formation, and glucosamine and total polysaccharides content of six Morchella species grown on a starch-based media were evaluated. Submerged fermentations in potato dextrose broth resulted in a glucosamine content of around 3.0%. In solid-state fermentations (SSF), using potato dextrose agar, a high linear growth rate (20.6 mm/day) was determined. Increased glucosamine and total polysaccharides content were observed after the formation of sclerotia. Biomass and glucosamine content were correlated, and the equations were used for the indirect estimation of biomass in SSF with agro-industrial starch-based materials. Wheat grains (WG), potato peels (PP), and a mixture of 1:1 of them (WG–PP) were evaluated as substrates. Results showed that the highest growth rate of 9.05 mm/day was determined on WG and the maximum biomass yield (407 mg/g) on WG–PP. The total polysaccharide content reached up to 18.4% of dried biomass in WG–PP. The results of the present study proved encouraging for the efficient bioconversion of potato and other starch-based agro-industrial waste streams to morel biomass and sclerotia eliciting nutritional and bioactive value.

1. Introduction

Mushrooms are widely known for their taste and flavor presenting many functional properties, primarily due to their unique chemical composition. They are consumed either fresh or processed. For instance, mushroom powder is used as a food additive to increase the content of dietary fibers in foods or as a partial flour substitute in bakery products [1]. In addition to fresh or dried mushrooms, fungal mycelium is also a rich source of bioactive compounds with many functional properties and has been suggested as an alternative mushroom product for human consumption [2]. Agro-industrial wastes and side streams have been converted into various bioactive compounds, including polysaccharides and enzymes, through mushroom cultivation [3,4,5]. Mushroom-derived polysaccharides, such as glucans and chitin, have attracted research interest mainly due to their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antitumor, and immune-stimulation activity [6].
Chitin is a structural polysaccharide of the fungal cell wall, composed of β(1,4)-linked units of N-acetyl-d-glucosamine [7]. The chitin content of fungal mycelium can reach up to 42% (w/w, dry mass) depending on the fungal species, fermentation mode (submerged or solid-state fermentation), and the substrate [7,8,9]. Chitin and its deacetylated derivate, chitosan, are valuable compounds finding many applications, namely in food and pharmaceutical industry, due to their antimicrobial and antioxidant properties [7]. They have been used as functional food components, edible films [7], immobilization support material for enzymes [10], delivery system for food ingredients, such as carotenoids [11], and for the treatment of human diseases [12]. Chitin production reached around 28,000 tons in 2015 [13], mainly produced from by-products of the seafood industry [7,14]. The chemical extraction of glucosamine from seafood by-products requires high energy consumption and the use of strong chemical reagents. However, the main disadvantages of using seafood by-products, as glucosamine sources, are the seasonal and geographical limitations, the potential allergic effects of the product, and the formation of products with inconsistent composition and physicochemical properties [8,15]. Thus, chitin production by fungal fermentations has been suggested as an alternative source, as glucosamine can be produced in controlled conditions by simpler extraction process and using less-aggressive chemicals [8,14].
Morels (Morchella spp.), belonging to the Helvellaceae family of ascomycetes, are among the most desirable edible wild mushrooms. Researchers have suggested that the differences in the appearance of morels are due to environmental influences and that the mycelial mass determines the appearance or phenotype of morels in terms of color (yellow or black), yet not the shape. They have attracted research interest due to their commercial value, medicinal properties, and unique taste and flavor [16]. The artificial commercial cultivation of the fruit bodies of morels on various agro-industrial substrates is a difficult process, which is linked to the formation of a heterokaryotic sclerotium [17]. Published studies on the considerable morphological variations in the physiology of Morchella sp. in different carbon [18] and nitrogen sources [19] are available, however reports dealing with the production of high-added-value compounds by Morchella sp. are scarce. The most recent studies have demonstrated that polysaccharides from Morchella sp. present antioxidant [20,21] and antitumor [22] properties. Additionally, sclerotia from mushrooms are considered as an exceptional source of bioactive components characterized for their functional and medicinal properties, such as antitumor and anti-inflammatory activities. Lau and Abdullah [23] pointed out that the biological activities of the sclerotia seemed to be comparable to those of the mycelia. However, their formation and chemical composition are strongly dependent on the substrate and the fermentation conditions [23].
Many researchers have studied those characteristics of Morchella mushrooms in submerged fermentations (SmF) [24,25,26], still little is known about their behavior in solid-state fermentations (SSF) [27]. The aim of the present study was to determine the glucosamine and polysaccharide contents in the mycelia of different Morchella strains grown on starch-based substrates. Initially, six different Morchella strains were cultivated on commercial starch-based substrates. Biomass production, sclerotia formation, and glucosamine and polysaccharide contents were determined in SmF and SSF. Equations relating biomass production and glucosamine content were established and subsequently applied to estimate the biomass production during SSF on agro-industrial starch-based substrates. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study reporting the relation between the biomass production and the glucosamine content of Morchella strains.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Raw Materials

Wheat grains (WG) and wheat bran were purchased from the local market (Athens, Greece). Potato peels (PP), HERMES variety, were kindly provided by the potato processing industry Tasty Foods S.A. (Athens, Greece).

2.2. Morchella Strains, Media, and Culture Conditions

Experiments were carried out using six Morchella strains, belonging to the group of yellow and black morels (Table 1). All strains were obtained from the fungal AMRL (Athens Mushroom Research Laboratory) culture collection of the Laboratory of Edible Fungi, Institute of Technology of Agricultural Products (LEF, ITAP). Morchella strains were grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) plates at 26 ± 0.5 °C for seven days. PDA plates were maintained at 4 ± 0.5 °C and used as fermentation inoculums.

2.3. Submerged Fermentations on Commercial Substrates

SmF fermentations were initially conducted for the evaluation of biomass production in commercial starch- and glucose-based media. Potato dextrose broth (PDB) media was prepared by enriching the extract from 300 g/L potatoes with glucose 20 g/L and CaCO3 2 g/L. In addition, a glucose-based media (GPYB; Glucose Peptone Yeast Broth) was also prepared consisting of: Glucose, 30 g/L; peptone, 3.5 g/L; yeast extract, 2.5 g/L; CaCO3, 2 g/L; KH2PO4, 1 g/L; MgSO4·7H2O, 0.5 g/L; CaCl2·2H2O, 0.3 g/L; MnSO4·H2O, 0.04 g/L; ZnSO4·7H2O, 0.02 g/L; and FeCl3·6H2O, 0.08 g/L. Both media were used for the SmF cultures in static conditions. Erlenmeyer flasks of 100 mL capacity, containing 20 mL of each liquid medium, were autoclaved for 20 min at 121 ± 0.5 °C, and subsequently inoculated with two agar disks of 6 mm diameter. Inoculum disks were cut from a seven-day-old growing colony on a PDA Petri dish. Static cultures were incubated at 26 ± 0.5 °C for 21 days. Triplicates were made for every sampling to determine biomass production, mycelium glucosamine content, polysaccharide content, and sclerotia formation. The experimental data were fitted by ORIGIN software (OriginPro 8, Originlab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA).

2.4. Solid-State Fermentations on Commercial Substrates

SSF using PDA plates were employed for the evaluation of biomass production, radius growth rate, and glucosamine content of Morchella strains. Also, the cellophane technique was applied for the estimation of the dry weight of the fungal biomass, since it prevents penetration of hyphae into solid medium and makes the separation of the fungus possible [28,29]. Specifically, 20 mL of PDA, prepared as previously described and solidified by the addition of 20 g/L agar, was poured into Petri dishes (90 mm diameter), covered by polyethylene terephthalate (PET) membrane disks. PET membranes were boiled twice for 15 min in deionized water to remove plasticizers [30] and sterilized at 121 ± 0.5 °C for 20 min. Petri dishes were inoculated at the center with a 6 mm diameter mycelium plug and incubated at 26 ± 0.5 °C. At least three replicates per treatment and sampling were used to study the growth of tested strains regarding radius growth rate and sclerotia formation, biomass production, and its glucosamine and polysaccharide content. The experimental data were fitted by ORIGIN software (Northampton, MA, USA).

2.5. Solid-State Fermentations on Agro-Industrial Substrates

Wheat grains (WG), potato peels (PP), and a mixture of them (WG:PP, 1:1) were used for the solid-state cultivation of selected Morchella strains. Substrate content was 95% of WG, PP, or WG–PP, supplemented with 5% of wheat bran. PP and WG were washed to remove any wasteful materials. WG were boiled for 20 min and left to cool down. After drainage they were mixed with the previously moistened wheat bran to obtain ~65%–70% moisture content, while the pH ranged from 6.5 to 6.9 after addition of 0.2% (w/w) CaCO3. Petri dishes (150 mm diameter) were filled with the substrates and autoclaved for 20 min at 121 ± 0.5 °C. Inoculation was carried out with a 9 mm diameter agar disk and incubated at 26 ± 0.5 °C for 30 days. Mycelial growth rate as well as sclerotia formation and maturation was recorded daily. The mycelium concentration in the substrate was indirectly estimated through the regression equations of glucosamine vs. biomass, defined previously in the PDA–PET experiment.

2.6. Analytical Methods

2.6.1. Mycelium Growth Rate

The radius growth rate (Kr) of mycelium (expressed in mm/day), was determined by fitting the growth parameters using the equation [31,32]:
r = K r ⋅ t + r 0 ,
where r and r0 are the colony radius at time t and t0, respectively, and Kr is the constant growth rate. Measurements of colony diameter on the surface of SSF were taken in two perpendicular directions every 12 or 24 h, until the colony completely covered the Petri dish.

2.6.2. Determination of Biomass and Sugar Consumption in Submerged Fermentations

Samples were withdrawn from SmF at specific intervals for the determination of biomass production and sugars consumption. Fungal biomass was separated from the culture broth by filtration (Whatman No. 2, Buckinghamshire, UK), washed twice with deionized water, and dried at 60 ± 0.5 °C until constant weight. The clear broth was used for the determination of reduced sugars by the 3,5-dinitro-2-hydroxy-benzoic acid (DNS) method [33] and total sugars content was estimated by the phenol–sulfuric acid method according to Dubois et al. [34].

2.6.3. Determination of Biomass in Solid-State Fermentations

The glucosamine present in the fungal cell wall was used to monitor fungal biomass in SSF. Initially, a glucosamine standard curve (glucosamine vs. absorbance) was obtained using various concentrations of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Subsequently, regression equations of the glucosamine content of each Morchella strain were determined using dry biomass (biomass vs. glucosamine). The chitin content of dried biomass was hydrolyzed into N-acetylglucosamine according to the method described by Scotti et al. [35]. Specifically, around 2 g of dry sample was mixed with 5 mL of 72% H2SO4 (Merck, Germany) followed by agitation (130 rpm) (rotary shaker, MPM Instruments Srl., M301-OR, Italy) for 30 min at room temperature. Then, samples were diluted with 54 mL deionized water and treated at 121 ± 0.5 °C for 2 h. The hydrolyzate was neutralized (pH 7.0) with a 10 N NaOH solution (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and further treated for the quantification of glucosamine [4].
The colorimetric method of Ride and Drysdale [9] was carried out for the determination of glucosamine content. An aliquot of 3 mL of hydrolyzate was obtained and an equal volume of 5% (w/v) NaNO2 (Merck, Germany) and 5% (w/v) KHSO4 (Merck, Germany) were added. The mixture was agitated for 15 min and then centrifuged (1500 × g, 2 °C, 2 min) (Hettich Micro22R, Tuttlingen, Germany). Then, 3 mL of the supernatant was obtained followed by addition of 1 mL of 12.5% (w/v) NH4SO3NH2 (Merck, Germany) and agitation for 5 min. Subsequently, 1 mL of freshly prepared 0.5% (w/v) 3-methyl-2-benzothiazolone hydrazone hydrochloride (MBTH; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added, followed by heating in a boiling water bath for 3 min. The mixtures were cooled down and 1 mL of freshly prepared 0.5% (w/v) FeCl3 (Alfa Aesar, Kandel, Germany) was added to each sample. After standing for 30 min, the solution was centrifuged and the absorbance was read at 650 nm (Jasco V-530 UV/VIS spectrophotometer, Jasco, Tokyo, Japan). The same protocol (hydrolysis and analysis) was followed using the unfermented medium as a blank. In SSF experiment results were expressed as mg fungal biomass per g of dry substrate.

2.6.4. Determination of Total Polysaccharide Content

The content of polysaccharides was determined following a modification of the anthrone method [36,37,38] using sucrose as a standard. Specifically, anthrone reagent (0.2 g/L) was prepared in an aqueous solution of H2SO4 (70%, w/v), then the mixture was boiled for 15 min and rapidly cooled. The reagent was kept in a dark and cool (4 °C) place for 24 h. For the determination of total polysaccharides (TP), the dried biomass was extracted with 10 mL of H2SO4 70% for 30 min using an agitation rate of 130 rpm. Subsequently, 5 mL anthrone reagent was added to 1 mL of the extracted sample. The mixture was first cooled in water, then swirled, heated in a water bath at 60 ± 0.5 °C for 8 min, and rapidly cooled. The absorbance of samples was measured at 630 nm (Jasco, V-530 UV/VIS, Tokyo, Japan) after 1 h.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Submerged Fermentations

3.1.1. Biomass Production, Glucosamine, and Total Polysaccharide Content

The quantification of fungal biomass is unfeasible in SSF due to the penetration of the hyphae into the solid substrate [8,39]. Among the different methods for monitoring fungal biomass in SSF, the estimation of glucosamine content is considered a representative indicator [38]. Therefore, SmF fermentations were initially carried out in PDB and GPYB to determine the relationship between glucosamine content and dry biomass.
Morchella strains were cultivated for 21 days in PDB and GPYB. In all cases, Morchella strains were able to consume more than 90% of the initial sugar concentration, except for AMRL 82 in GPYB (75%). The highest biomass production and the respective glucosamine and polysaccharide contents are shown in Table 2. Biomass production ranged from 9.3 to 11.1 g/L for yellow morels and from 9.4 to 14.2 g/L for the black ones. The glucosamine content varied between 2.3%–3.7% (w/w) for both yellow and black morels. Although, in most cases, higher biomass concentrations were observed in the GPYB medium (~10–14 g/L), the highest biomass productivity was attained in PDB for almost all strains (~1.3–1.7 g/L/day). The yield of biomass (Yx/s) based on the utilized substrate was calculated in order to establish the relationship between microbial growth and substrate consumption (Table 2). Biomass yield ranged around 0.41–0.43 g/g in all cases, except for AMRL 36 and AMRL 82, which was above 0.5 g/g in GPYB medium. This probably means that the starch-based substrate promoted biomass productivity. Previous studies highlighted that starch has been characterized as a superior carbon source for Morchella strains [40,41]. Zhang et al. [42] reported the ability of Morchella esculenta to degrade starch and upgrade the nutritional value of cornmeal during SSF; it was attributed to the high α-amylase production (215 U/g on the 20th cultivation day). Xing et al. [43] reported high biomass production (12.6 g/L) by the black morel Morchella conica grown on a synthetic sucrose-based medium. Other studies have reported lower concentrations, ranging from 2.6 to 10 g/L for both black and yellow morels using various carbon sources [25,40,44,45,46,47].
In this study, glucosamine content varied among Morchella strains, from 2.3% to 3.7% of fungal dry matter. Obviously, glucosamine content was dependent on the fungal strain and the composition of the substrate, which has been previously reported by other studies [9,38,39,48]. The chitin content of Morchella sp. has been reported to be around 16% [49], but the relation of fungal biomass with glucosamine content on agro-industrial substrates has not been reported.
The polysaccharides present in mycelium and fruiting bodies are classified as glycoconjugates and can be quantified by the anthrone method [50]. Table 2 presents the results of the TP content of Morchella mycelia grown in PDB and GPYB. The TP content of mushrooms was influenced by the strains; yellow morels had ~10.4% and black ~11.2 % w/w. The morels AMRL 36 and 63 presented the highest TP content (10.1%–12.2%) among all strains. Morel mushrooms are well known for their rich nutritional composition and, specifically, their sugar profile comprises mainly mannose (up to 43% w/w on a dry basis) and mannitol (up to 11.5%, w/w), followed by glucose, trehalose, fructose, and arabitol [51]. Dried biomass from different culture days was obtained for each strain and their glucosamine content was estimated. The results were correlated and the linear regression equations of glucosamine versus biomass are shown in Table 3. Results demonstrate that biomass production and glucosamine content were found to be highly correlated (R2 > 0.97). The aim was to use the equations to convert glucosamine content into mycelia biomass in the following SSF experiments. This approach has been already successfully applied in SSF of the medicinal mushroom Lentinula edodes [4].

3.2. Solid-State Fermentations on Commercial Substrates

PDA was selected for the evaluation of growth rate, biomass production, glucosamine content, and sclerotia formation in SSF, due to the higher biomass productivity of Morchella strains in SmF (Table 2). Morel strains AMRL 14 and AMRL 82 strains were excluded from SSF due to the lower biomass productivity observed in SmF (Table 2).

3.2.1. Mycelial Growth Rate

The mycelial growth rate of four Morchella strains was evaluated on PDA medium, with and without the addition of a PET membrane (Figure 1). In the case of SSF without PET membrane, strains from the black morels complex (AMRL 63 and 74) proved to grow faster than yellow morels. Among the black morels, the AMRL 74 strain presented the maximum growth rate (Kr) yielding 22.2 mm/day, whereas AMRL 52 presented the greater growth rate (13.1 mm/day) from the yellow morels complex. Brock [40] determined a growth rate of 21 mm/day for M. esculenta in SSF with glucose, as a carbon source. Winder [18] reported lower growth rates for the black morel strains compared to this study. More specifically, the growth rate was around 6 mm/day in SSF with sucrose and mannose as the substrate and 1 mm/day in PDA. Lower growth rates have been also determined for other mushrooms. More specifically, growth rates up to 6.6 mm/day for Pleurotus sp., 4.4 mm/day for L. edodes, and 18.8 mm/day for Volvariella volvacea have been reported during SSF on PDA [52]. In the case of SSF with PDA–PET, the growth rate was remarkably suppressed. The growth rate was reduced by 64%–82%, depending on the Morchella strain. The highest growth rate in PDA–PET was 5.7 mm/day from AMRL 63. Morchella strains have not been studied in SSF with the presence of the membrane. The only published study using PDA covered with a membrane reports a growth rate of 4.8 mm/day for Morchella [53]. Reeslev and Kjøller [54] reported that the presence of the membrane reduced the growth rate of the ascomycota Paecilomyces farinosus only by 8%. It could be assumed that the type of membrane can affect the growth rate. For instance, in this study a plastic membrane was employed, whereas Reeslev and Kjøller [54] used a cellulosic membrane.

3.2.2. Sclerotia Formation

Sclerotia formation and maturation was studied on PDA substrate, with and without a PET membrane (Table 4). Maturation was expressed according to the size of sclerotia (immature ≤ 1 mm, mature > 1 mm), whereas the number of sclerotia was classified as follows: Few < 20, adequate > 20, and many > 50. In the case of PDA medium, morel strains AMRL 36, AMRL 52, and AMRL 74 produced few immature sclerotia at the eighth day of cultivation, whereas few mature sclerotia were formed only in the later fermentation stage (21st day). AMRL 63 exhibited more immature sclerotia compared with all the other strains. Immature and mature sclerotia of AMRL 63 appeared earlier.
Sclerotia formation was significantly impaired by the PET membrane. More matured sclerotia were formed in the case of AMRL 52 and AMRL 63 strains, as compared with PDA without PET. The number of immature and mature sclerotia was also promoted in all strains. Generally, starch has been found to promote sclerotia production [41]. The presence of PET induced a nutritional stress, which in turn promoted sclerotia formation [41]. The present study demonstrated that sclerotia formation was influenced by fermentation time, species, and culture conditions. Similar conclusions have also been mentioned by [41] for Morchella sp. Sclerotia are composed of large cells with thick walls and their presence is considered a precursor of fruiting body formation [41]. Additionally, their significance is based on their chemical composition as they are a rich source of bioactive compounds.

3.2.3. Biomass Production, Glucosamine, and Total Polysaccharide Content

The use of membranes as a separation method of mushroom biomass from solid substrates, allows the direct estimation of biomass, hence this method has been widely reported in literature [28]. In our study, PDA plates covered with PET were utilized and the biomass accumulated on the membrane surface was determined. Black morels achieved higher biomass concentrations than yellow morels on the PDA–PET substrate. In particular, the maximum biomass concentration was obtained for AMRL 63 (7.38 g/L) and AMRL 52 (6.47 g/L), both on the 34th day (Figure 2). These strains also presented the highest biomass concentration in PDB fermentation (Section 3.1.1, Table 2). Similar studies with Morchella strains have not been published, however the mycorrhizal fungi Suillus collinitus and Pisolithus tinctorius produced 7.1 and 5.4 g/L of biomass, respectively, in PDA with a membrane [29]. The glucosamine content was higher than 2.5% (w/w) for all Morchella strains (Figure 2). A positive correlation was found between biomass production and glucosamine content for all strains (R2 > 0.97 and R2 = 0.8 for AMRL 63). Similar glucosamine contents were obtained in SmF using PDB.
The age of the mycelium affected the TP content (Figure 2), which was found to be more than 15% for the yellow morel strains. The comparison with SmF in PDB revealed that TP content was enhanced in SSF. A positive correlation (R2 > 0.94) was found, between biomass production and TP content, for all strains (for AMRL 74 a positive correlation was found until the 22nd day). This is in agreement with previous results for other mushrooms [55]. On the top of that, Desgranges et al. [38] mentioned that TP content is increased as the age of the mycelium increases for the ascomycota Beauveria bassiana. Figure 2 showed that the TP content was influenced by sclerotia formation. In particular, increased TP content was observed as the number of mature and immature sclerotia increased. The determination of higher glucosamine and polysaccharide contents along with the appearance and maturation of sclerotia indicates that sclerotia are rich in chitin and polysaccharides. This has not been mentioned before for Morchella sp., however the presence of chitin and β-glucans was identified in sclerotia of Pleurotus tuber-regium [56]. The composition of the sclerotia of Morchella sp. should be further studied to identify the bioactive compounds and their biological activities.
The dried biomass was collected and correlated with glucosamine content. The linear regression equations were found to be the same, for each strain, as those indicated in Table 2 (PDB medium). These equations were further implemented for the determination of biomass formation in SSF with natural starch-based media.

3.3. Solid-State Fermentations on Agro-Industrial Substrates

SSF in WG, PP, and WG–PP were carried out using the morel strains AMRL 52 and AMRL 63, as they yielded higher biomass, TP content, and sclerotia formation in commercial substrates.

3.3.1. Mycelial Growth Rate

The growth rate of Morchella strains AMRL 63 and AMRL 52 was studied on WG, PP, and WG–PP substrates, as depicted in Figure 3. Both Morchella strains presented similar growth behavior in all substrates, with the black morel strain exhibiting faster growth rate than the yellow morel strain. Specifically, the highest growth rate of AMRL 63 was detected on WG substrate (9.0 mm/day) and WG–PP (8.8 mm/day), whereas AMRL 52 presented similar growth rates in all substrates (PP, 6.1 mm/day; WG, 5.9 mm/day; WG–PP, 5.6 mm/day).
The comparison of PDA and PP, WG, and WG–PP substrates demonstrated that AMRL 63 and AMRL 52 strains exhibited higher extension rates on agro-industrial substrates. This shows that starch-based substrates could be an alternative for the production of Morchella mycelium.
The results clearly indicate that the substrate had a crucial role in the growth of Morchella strains. For instance, Alvarado-Castillo et al. [57] mentioned that growth rate was significantly affected by the type of grains used in SSF employed in jars. Morchella strains presented the highest mycelia growth (more than 30 cm2) in rye grains, followed by oats, wheat, and maize grains [57]. SSF of other mushrooms, such as Pleurotus sp., L. edodes, Ganoderma sp., and V. volvacea among others, have shown that the growth rate is highly dependent on the strain and the substrate [3,52]. Pleurotus sp., Ganoderma sp., and Lentinula sp. presented maximum growth rates ranging from 4.4 to 9.8 mm/day when cultivated on spent mushroom substrate, wheat straw, corn cobs, oak sawdust, and peanut shells) [3,52], whereas growth rate of V. volvacea reached 12.5 mm/day in wheat straw [52].

3.3.2. Sclerotia Formation

Different outcomes were obtained in SSF of AMRL 52 and AMRL 63 strains in the WG, PP, and WG–PP substrates (Table 5), as compared to PDA substrate. The quantity of mature sclerotia was lower compared to the PDA–PET medium. Morchella strains formed sclerotia in WG and WG–PP substrate, whereas no sclerotia were observed in PP substrate. Among strains, AMRL 63 produced more mature and immature sclerotia on 30th day in WG–PP. It seems therefore that the mycelium growth rate is positively correlated to the sclerotia number. However, Alvarado-Castillo et al. [57] observed that growth rate was inversely related to sclerotia formation in SSF using various grains. Generally, the sclerotia formation of Morchella mushrooms is promoted in starch-based substrates [17], due to their content of rapidly metabolized sugars, such as starch and simple sugars. This has been also observed in SSF of M. esculenta using a co-substrate of wheat bran and corn starch [58].

3.3.3. Biomass Production and Total Polysaccharide Content

An indirect estimation of biomass production was applied in SSF using starch-based agro-industrial substrates. In this case, the glucosamine content was determined and converted to biomass (mg per g of dried substrate) using the equations deriving from the SSF on PDA. As depicted in Figure 4, the highest biomass production of 407.1 and 384.6 mg/g were detected in WG–PP and WG substrates for the AMRL 63 strain. The morel strain AMRL 52 was favored by the PP substrate, presenting its maximum biomass (215.5 mg/g) on the 20th day. These results are in agreement with those obtained during SmF and SSF using PDB and PDA media, respectively, which confirmed that the black morel AMRL 63 is able to produce higher biomass concentrations than the yellow morel AMRL 52. Papinutti and Lechner [58] reported that M. esculenta produced 54 mg/g biomass in wheat bran. Similar studies dealing with the evaluation of biomass production using other mushrooms species have been previously reported. Specifically, L. edodes reached up to 510.3 mg/g during SSF of bean stalks [4]. Among Ganoderma strains, G. resinaceum showed a maximum biomass production of 151.23 mg/g during SSF in spent mushroom substrate. Moreover, Pleurotus ostreatus and Pleurotus pulmonarius presented biomass concentrations up to 141.62 mg/g when cultivated on the same substrate [3]. It is worth noting that there is a positive correlation between growth rate and biomass production, as observed also in SSF using commercial substrates. These results are not in accordance with previous findings reporting that growth rate and biomass production of Ganoderma and Pleurotus strains were negatively related [3,4,59].
The TP content of fermented agro-industrial substrates was similar for the black and yellow morels. Specifically, AMRL 52 and AMRL 63 mycelia achieved the highest TP content of 18.4% and 15.4% of dried biomass in PP and WG–PP, respectively. Previous studies have identified the bioactive compounds [60] deriving from Morchella mushrooms, showing that their functional properties are related to beneficial effects on human health [20,21,61]. The present results demonstrate the perspective for the production of bioactive compounds, such as glucosamine and polysaccharides, from Morchella sp. through the utilization of agro-industrial substrates.

4. Conclusions

The present study evaluated biomass production along with glucosamine and polysaccharides contents of black and yellow morel strains through the utilization of commercial and agro-industrial starch-based media. Glucosamine and polysaccharide mycelium contents were influenced by the age of the mycelia, presence of sclerotia, fermentation mode, type of substrate, and the strain. Linear regression equations between glucosamine and biomass of Morchella strains were reported for the first time. Biomass production and glucosamine content were found to be highly correlated, indicating that the determination of glucosamine content is a reliable indicator for the indirect estimation of Morchella biomass in SSF. In addition, high glucosamine and polysaccharide contents were correlated with high biomass production, presenting a R2 value higher than 0.9 for the majority of fungal strains. Conclusively, Morchella strains were able to produce biomass rich in glucosamine and polysaccharides in SSF using starchy materials. These results suggest that the mycelium and sclerotia of Morchella sp. could be used as an alternative source of bioactive compounds. SSF have present some difficulties regarding the recovery of bioactive compounds [8]. Alternatively, fermented substrates (e.g., cereals, fruit pomace) enriched with bioactive compounds can be directly utilized as food supplements. This has already been suggested for fermented solids rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids [62], thus it could be expanded for other bioactive compounds, including chitin and polysaccharides using mycelium from edible fungi. In addition, it has been indicated that the supplementation of culture media with various nutrients, including vegetable oils, improved biomass production and its glucosamine content [8]. Hence, optimization of fermentation conditions and exploitation of other culture media could contribute to higher glucosamine and polysaccharide contents in fungal mycelium.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.P. (Aikaterini Papadaki) and P.D.; methodology, A.P. (Aikaterini Papadaki), P.D., and A.P. (Antonios Philippoussis); writing—original draft preparation, A.P. (Aikaterini Papadaki) and A.P. (Antonios Philippoussis); writing—review and editing, A.P. (Aikaterini Papadaki), P.D., and S.P.; supervision, A.P. (Antonios Philippoussis) and P.D.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Diamantopoulou, P.; Philippoussis, A. Cultivated Mushrooms: Preservation and Processing. In Handbook of Vegetable Preservation and Processing, 2nd ed.; Hui, Y.H., Evranuz, E.Ö., Bingöl, G., Erten, H., Jaramillo-Flores, M.E., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015; pp. 495–525. [Google Scholar]
  2. Carvajal, A.E.S.S.; Koehnlein, E.A.; Soares, A.A.; Eler, G.J.; Nakashima, A.T.A.; Bracht, A.; Peralta, R.M. Bioactives of fruiting bodies and submerged culture mycelia of Agaricus brasiliensis (A. blazei) and their antioxidant properties. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 493–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Economou, C.N.; Diamantopoulou, P.A.; Philippoussis, A.N. Valorization of spent oyster mushroom substrate and laccase recovery through successive solid state cultivation of Pleurotus, Ganoderma, and Lentinula strains. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 5213–5222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Philippoussis, A.; Diamantopoulou, P.; Papadopoulou, K.; Lakhtar, H.; Roussos, S.; Parissopoulos, G.; Papanikolaou, S. Biomass, laccase and endoglucanase production by Lentinula edodes during solid state fermentation of reed grass, bean stalks and wheat straw residues. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 27, 285–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Philippoussis, A.; Zervakis, G.; Diamantopoulou, P. Bioconversion of lignocellulosic wastes through the cultivation of the edible mushrooms Agrocybe aegerita, Volvariella volvacea and Pleurotus spp. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 17, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Choong, Y.-K.; Ellan, K.; Chen, X.-D.; Mohamad, S.A. Extraction and Fractionation of Polysaccharides from a Selected Mushroom Species, Ganoderma lucidum: A Critical Review, Fractionation, Hassan Al- Haj Ibrahim. IntechOpen, 2018; pp. 39–60. Available online: https://www.intechopen.com/books/fractionation/extraction-and-fractionation-of-polysaccharides-from-a-selected-mushroom-species-ganoderma-lucidum-a (accessed on 2 June 2019). [CrossRef]
  7. Hamed, I.; Özogul, F.; Regenstein, J.M. Industrial applications of crustacean by-products (chitin, chitosan, and chitooligosaccharides): A review. Trend Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 48, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sitanggang, A.B.; Sophia, L.; Wu, H.S. Aspects of glucosamine production using microorganisms. Int. Food Res. J. 2012, 19, 393–404. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ride, J.P.; Drysdale, R.B. A chemical method for estimating Fusarium oxysporum f. lycopersici in infected tomato plants. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 1971, 1, 409–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zdarta, J.; Meyer, A.S.; Jesionowski, T.; Pinelo, M. A General Overview of Support Materials for Enzyme Immobilization: Characteristics, Properties, Practical Utility. Catalysts 2018, 8, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tan, C.; Feng, B.; Zhang, X.; Xia, W.; Xia, S. Biopolymer-coated liposomes by electrostatic adsorption of chitosan (chitosomes) as novel delivery systems for carotenoids. Food Hydrocoll 2016, 52, 774–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cheung, R.C.F.; Ng, T.B.; Wong, J.H.; Chan, W.Y. Chitosan: An Update on Potential Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Applications. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 5156–5186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. A Worldwide Market with a Strong Demand. Available online: http://sflyproteins.com/a-worldwide-market-with-a-strong-demand/ (accessed on 2 June 2019).
  14. Wu, T.; Zivanovic, S.; Draughon, F.A.; Sams, C.E. Chitin and Chitosan Value-Added Products from Mushroom Waste. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 7905–7910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Di Lena, G.; Annibate, A.D.; Sermanni, G.G. Influence of the age and growth conditions on the mycelial chitin content of Lentinus edodes. J. Basic Microbiol. 1994, 34, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Prasad, P.; Chauhan, K.; Kandari, L.S.; Maikhuri, R.K.; Purohit, A.; Bhatt, R.P.; Rao, K.S. Morchella esculenta (Guchhi): Need for scientific intervention for its cultivation in Central Himalaya. Curr. Sci. 2002, 82, 1098–1100. [Google Scholar]
  17. Volk, T.J.; Leonard, T.J. Cytology of the life-cycle of Morchella. Mycol. Res. 1990, 94, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Winder, R.S. Cultural studies of Morchella elata. Mycol. Res. 2006, 110, 612–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Güller, P.; Arkan, O. Cultural Characteristics of Morchella esculenta Mycelium on Some Nutrients. Turk. J. Biol. 2000, 24, 783–794. [Google Scholar]
  20. Xu, N.; Lu, Y.; Hou, J.; Liu, C.; Sun, Y. A Polysaccharide Purified from Morchella conica Pers. Prevents Oxidative Stress Induced by H2O2 in Human Embryonic Kidney (HEK) 293T Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 4027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, C.; Zhou, X.; Meng, Q.; Wang, Μ.; Zhang, Y.; Fu, S. Secondary Metabolites and Antiradical Activity of Liquid Fermentation of Morchella sp. Isolated from Southwest China. Molecules 2019, 24, 1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, C.; Sun, Y.; Mao, Q.; Guo, X.; Li, P.; Liu, Y.; Xu, N. Characteristics and Antitumor Activity of Morchella esculenta Polysaccharide Extracted by Pulsed Electric Field. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lau, B.F.; Abdullah, N. Sclerotium-Forming Mushrooms as an Emerging Source of Medicinals: Current perspectives. In Mushroom Biotechnology, Developments and Applications; Petre, M., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 111–136. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gilbert, F. The submerged culture of Morchella. Mycologia 1960, 52, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kaul, T.N. Physiological studies on Morchella spp. I. Carbon utilization. Bull. Bot. Soc. Bengal. 1978, 31, 35–42. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kosaric, N.; Miyata, N. Growth of morel mushroom mycelium in cheese whey. J. Dairy Res. 1981, 48, 149–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Philippoussis, A.; Balis, C. Studies on the morphogenesis of sclerotia and subterranean mycelial network of ascocarps in “Morchella” species. In Science and Cultivation of Edible Fungi, Proceedings of the 14th international congress on the science and cultivation of edible fungi, Oxford, England; Elliott, T.J., Ed.; A.A. Balkema: Rotterdam, the Netherlands, 1995; pp. 847–855. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ang, T.N.; Ngoh, G.C.; Chua, A.S.M. Development of a novel inoculum preparation method for solid-state fermentation-Cellophane film culture (CFC) technique. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2013, 43, 774–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Araujo, A.A.; Roussos, S. A technique for mycelial development of ectomycorrhizal fungi on agar media. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2002, 98, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Robson, G.D.; Bell, S.D.; Kuhn, P.J.; Trinci, A.P.J. Glucose and penicillin concentrations in agar medium below fungal colonies. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1987, 133, 361–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Dantigny, P.; Guilmart, A.; Bensoussan, M. Basis of predictive mycology. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2005, 100, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Baranyi, J.; Roberts, T.A.; McClure, P. A non-autonomous differential equation to model bacterial growth. Food Microbiol. 1993, 10, 43–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Miller, G.L. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugars. Anal. Chem. 1959, 31, 426–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dubois, M.; Gilles, K.A.; Hamilton, J.K.; Rebers, P.A.; Smith, F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 1956, 28, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Scotti, C.T.; Vergoignan, C.; Feron, G.; Durand, A. Glucosamine measurement as indirect method for biomass estimation of Cunninghamella elegans grown in solid state cultivation conditions. Biochem. Eng. J. 2001, 7, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bailey, R.W. The reaction of pentoses with anthrone. Biochem. J. 1958, 68, 669–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. De Bruyn, J.W.; Van Keulen, H.A.; Ferguson, J.H.A. Rapid method for the simultaneous determination of glucose and fructose using anthrone reagent. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1968, 19, 597–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Desgranges, C.; Vergoignan, C.; Georges, M.; Durand, A. Biomass estimation in solid state fermentation I. Manual biochemical methods. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1991, 35, 200–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Roche, N.; Venague, A.; Desgranges, C.; Durand, A. Use of chitin measurement to estimate fungal biomass in solid state fermentation. Biotechnol. Adv. 1993, 11, 677–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Brock, D.T. Studies on the Nutrition of Morchella esculenta Fries. Mycologia 1951, 43, 402–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Stott, K.; Mohammed, C. Specialty Mushroom Production Systems: Maitake and Morels. A report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation; Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation: Barton, Australia, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang, G.P.; Zhang, F.; Ru, W.M.; Han, J.-R. Solid-state fermentation of cornmeal with the ascomycete Morchella esculenta for degrading starch and upgrading nutritional value. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 26, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xing, Z.; Sun, F.; Liu, J. Studies on the submerged-cultured conditions of Morchella conica. Acta Edulis Fungi 2004, 11, 38–43. [Google Scholar]
  44. Buswell, A.J.; Chang, S. Biomass and extracellular hydrolytic enzyme production by six mushroom species grown on soybean waste. Biotechnol. Lett. 1994, 16, 1317–1322. [Google Scholar]
  45. Bensoussan, M.; Tisserand, E.; Kabbaji, W.; Roussos, S. Partial characterization of aroma produced by submerged culture of morel mushroom mycelium. Cryptog. Mycol. 1995, 16, 65–75. [Google Scholar]
  46. Meng, F.; Liu, X.; Jia, L.; Song, Z.; Deng, P.; Fan, K. Optimization for the production of exopolysaccharides from Morchella esculenta SO-02 in submerged culture and its antioxidant activities in vitro. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 79, 700–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Xu, H.; Sun, L.-P.; Shi, Y.-Z.; Wu, Y.-H.; Zhang, B.; Zhao, D.-Q. Optimization of cultivation conditions for extracellular polysaccharide and mycelium biomass by Morchella esculenta As51620. Biochem. Eng. J. 2008, 39, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sparringa, A.R.; Owens, D.J. Glucosamine content of tempe mould, Rhizopus oligosporus. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1999, 47, 153–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ruíz-Herrera, J.; Osorio, E. Isolation and chemical analysis of the cell wall of Morchella sp. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 1974, 40, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Broecker, F.; Seeberger, P.H. Identification and Design of Synthetic B Cell Epitopes for Carbohydrate-Based Vaccines. Methods Enzymol. 2017, 597, 311–334. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  51. Tietel, Z.; Masaphy, S. True morels (Morchella)—Nutritional and phytochemical composition, health benefits and flavor: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 58, 1888–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Zervakis, G.; Philippoussis, A.; Ioannidou, S.; Diamantopoulou, P. Mycelium growth kinetics and optimal temperature conditions for the cultivation of edible mushroom species on lignocellulosic substrates. Folia Microbiol. 2001, 46, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Masaphy, S. Effect of CaCO3 on Morchella growth and sclerotia formation. Int. Soc. Mushroom Sci. 2004, 16. Available online: http://www.isms.biz/download/volume-16-part-1-article-14-effect-of-caco3-on-morchella-growth-and-sclerotia-formation/ (accessed on 2 June 2019).
  54. Reeslev, M.; Kjøller, A. Comparison of biomass dry weights and radial growth rates of fungal colonies on media solidified with different gelling compounds. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 4236–4239. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]
  55. Petre, V.; Petre, M.; Rusea, I.; Stǎnicǎ, F. Biotechnological recycling of fruit tree wastes by solid-state cultivation of mushrooms. In Mushroom Biotechnology, Developments and Applications; Petre, M., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 19–29. [Google Scholar]
  56. Cheung, P.C.K.; Lee, M.Y. Fractionation and Characterization of Mushroom Dietary Fiber (Nonstarch Polysaccharides) as Potential Nutraceuticals from Sclerotia of Pleurotus tuber-regium (Fries) Singer. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 3148–3151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Alvarado-Castillo, G.; Mata, G.; Pérez-Vázquez, A.; Martínez-Carrera, D.; Tablada, M.E.N.; Gellardo-López, F.; Osorio-Acosta, F. Morchella sclerotia production through grain supplementation. Interciencia 2011, 36, 768–773. [Google Scholar]
  58. Papinutti, L.; Lechner, B. Influence of the carbon source on the growth and lignocellulolytic enzyme production by Morchella esculenta strains. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 35, 1715–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Philippoussis, A.; Diamantopoulou, P. Exploitation of the biotechnological potential of agro-industrial by-products through mushroom cultivation. In Mushroom Biotechnology and Bioengineering; Petre, M., Berovic, M., Eds.; University of Pitesti: Bucharest, Romania, 2012; pp. 161–184. [Google Scholar]
  60. Lo, Y.C.; Lin, S.Y.; Ulziijargal, E.; Chen, S.Y.; Chien, R.C.; Tzou, Y.J.; Mau, J.L. Comparative study of contents of several bioactive components in fruiting bodies and mycelia of culinary-medicinal mushrooms. Int. J. Med. Mushrooms 2012, 14, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Pinto, M.R.; Barreto-Bergter, E.; Taborda, C.P. Glycoconjugates and polysaccharides of fungal cell wall and activation of immune system. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2008, 39, 195–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Ochsenreither, K.; Glück, C.; Stressler, T.; Fischer, L.; Syldatk, C. Production Strategies and Applications of Microbial Single Cell Oils. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Foods 08 00239 g001 550
Figure 1. Growth rate of yellow (AMRL 36, 52) and black (AMRL 63, 74) morel strains during solid-state fermentations on potato dextrose agar (PDA), with and without polyethylene terephthalate (PET) membrane.
Figure 1. Growth rate of yellow (AMRL 36, 52) and black (AMRL 63, 74) morel strains during solid-state fermentations on potato dextrose agar (PDA), with and without polyethylene terephthalate (PET) membrane.
Foods 08 00239 g001
Foods 08 00239 g002 550
Figure 2. Biomass (○) and sclerotia production (+/*), glucosamine (■) and total polysaccharides (TP) (▲) content of yellow (AMRL 36, 52) and black (AMRL 63, 74) morel strains during solid-state fermentation (12th, 22nd, and 34th day) on potato dextrose agar (PDA), covered by polyethylene terephthalate (PET) membrane. The symbols +/* represents the number of immature/mature sclerotia, respectively (+/*; < 20, ++/**; > 20, +++/***; > 50).
Figure 2. Biomass (○) and sclerotia production (+/*), glucosamine (■) and total polysaccharides (TP) (▲) content of yellow (AMRL 36, 52) and black (AMRL 63, 74) morel strains during solid-state fermentation (12th, 22nd, and 34th day) on potato dextrose agar (PDA), covered by polyethylene terephthalate (PET) membrane. The symbols +/* represents the number of immature/mature sclerotia, respectively (+/*; < 20, ++/**; > 20, +++/***; > 50).
Foods 08 00239 g002
Foods 08 00239 g003 550
Figure 3. Growth rate of yellow (AMRL 52) and black (AMRL 63) morel strains during solid-state fermentation on wheat grains (WG), potato peels (PP), and a mixture of them (WG–PP, 1:1).
Figure 3. Growth rate of yellow (AMRL 52) and black (AMRL 63) morel strains during solid-state fermentation on wheat grains (WG), potato peels (PP), and a mixture of them (WG–PP, 1:1).
Foods 08 00239 g003
Foods 08 00239 g004 550
Figure 4. Estimated mycelium mass accumulation of yellow AMRL 52 and black AMRL 63 morel strains during solid-state fermentation on wheat grains (WG), potato peels (PP), and a mixture of them (WG–PP, 1:1).
Figure 4. Estimated mycelium mass accumulation of yellow AMRL 52 and black AMRL 63 morel strains during solid-state fermentation on wheat grains (WG), potato peels (PP), and a mixture of them (WG–PP, 1:1).
Foods 08 00239 g004
Table
Table 1. Morchella strains used in the study.
Table 1. Morchella strains used in the study.
Morels GroupMorchella Strain
Yellow morelsM. rotunda AMRL 14
M. vulgaris AMRL 36
M. crassipes AMRL 52
Black morelsM. elata AMRL 63
M. conica AMRL 74
M. angusticeps AMRL 82
AMRL: Athens Mushroom Research Laboratory.
Table
Table 2. Maximum biomass production and glucosamine and total polysaccharide (TP) content of Morchella strains, during submerged fermentations in potato dextrose broth (PDB) and glucose-based broth (GPYB).
Table 2. Maximum biomass production and glucosamine and total polysaccharide (TP) content of Morchella strains, during submerged fermentations in potato dextrose broth (PDB) and glucose-based broth (GPYB).
Morchella
Strains		MediumTime
(days)		Biomass
X (g/L)		Biomass Yield
Yx/s (g/g)		Productivity
PX (g/L/day)		Glucosamine
(%, w/w)		TP
(%, w/w)
AMRL 14PDB1410.7 ± 0.670.420.763.0 ± 0.079.6 ± 0.60
GPYB1411.1 ± 0.800.410.793.7 ± 0.0810.6 ± 0.03
AMRL 36PDB79.8 ± 0.450.411.402.5 ± 0.079.7 ± 0.02
GPYB710.2 ± 0.070.521.462.3 ± 0.0810.8 ± 0.31
AMRL 52PDB79.3 ± 0.400.431.332.5 ± 0.0910.1 ± 0.05
GPYB1410.9 ± 0.350.430.783.1 ± 0.0611.6 ± 0.30
AMRL 63PDB710.6 ± 0.450.431.512.3 ± 0.0611.8 ± 0.12
GPYB1414.2 ± 0.100.471.013.0 ± 0.0412.2 ± 0.06
AMRL 74PDB711.8 ± 0.750.471.692.4 ± 0.0410.3 ± 0.14
GPYB149.4 ± 0.970.320.673.1 ± 0.0810.5 ± 0.10
AMRL 82PDB1410.9 ± 0.550.420.783.5 ± 0.0710.4 ± 0.30
GPYB1412.4 ± 0.050.560.892.8 ± 0.0510.9 ± 0.23
Table
Table 3. Linear regression equations of glucosamine (mg) and mycelial biomass (g) of Morchella strains grown on potato dextrose broth (PDB) and glucose-based broth (GPYB).
Table 3. Linear regression equations of glucosamine (mg) and mycelial biomass (g) of Morchella strains grown on potato dextrose broth (PDB) and glucose-based broth (GPYB).
Morchella StrainsMediumBiomass (y)/Glucosamine (x)Glucosamine (y)/Biomass (x)R2
AMRL 14PDBy = 0.0335x − 0.0256y = 29.499x + 0.84820.99
GPYBy = 0.0277x − 0.0046y = 34.845x + 0.44570.97
AMRL 36PDBy = 0.0376x − 0.0064y = 26.476x + 0.18880.99
GPYBy = 0.0336x − 0.0055y = 29.308x + 0.24570.98
AMRL 52PDBy = 0.0369x − 0.0026y = 26.151x + 0.27880.97
GPYBy = 0.0301x − 0.0002y = 32.581x + 0.10260.98
AMRL 63PDBy = 0.0378x + 0.0020y = 25.753x + 0.05130.97
GPYBy = 0.0328x − 0.0010y = 30.057x + 0.08250.99
AMRL 74PDBy = 0.0385x + 0.0045y = 25.627x - 0.05630.99
GPYBy = 0.0306x − 0.0124y = 32.223x + 0.46690.99
AMRL 82PDBy = 0.027x − 0.0073y = 36.685x + 0.35120.99
GPYBy = 0.0355x − 0.0219y = 27.988x + 0.65300.99
Table
Table 4. Sclerotia formation and maturation of yellow (AMRL 36, 52) and black (AMRL 63, 74) morel strains grown on PDA medium, with and without polyethylene terephthalate (PET) membrane.
Table 4. Sclerotia formation and maturation of yellow (AMRL 36, 52) and black (AMRL 63, 74) morel strains grown on PDA medium, with and without polyethylene terephthalate (PET) membrane.
MediumTime
(days)		Strains/Sclerotia Number and Maturation
AMRL 36AMRL 52AMRL 63AMRL 74
I 1M 2IMIMIM
PDA8+−+−+−+−
13+−+−++*+−
21+*+*++*+*
PDA–PET12−*−*+*+−
22+*+**++**+*
34++*++**++***++*
1 I: Immature sclerotia (≤ 1 mm); − no sclerotia, + few (< 20), ++ adequate (> 20), +++ many (> 50). 2 M: Mature sclerotia (>1 mm); − no sclerotia, * few (< 20), ** adequate (> 20), *** many (> 50).
Table
Table 5. Sclerotia formation and maturation of yellow AMRL 52 and black AMRL 63 morel strains grown on wheat grains (WG), potato peels (PP), and a mixture of them (WG–PP, 1:1).
Table 5. Sclerotia formation and maturation of yellow AMRL 52 and black AMRL 63 morel strains grown on wheat grains (WG), potato peels (PP), and a mixture of them (WG–PP, 1:1).
MediumTime
(days)		Strains/Sclerotia Number and Maturation
AMRL 52AMRL 63
I 1M 2IM
WG–PET20 +−+−
30++−+*
PP–PET20−−−−
30−−−−
WG:PP–PET20+*++*
30 +*++**
1 I: Immature sclerotia (≤ 1 mm); − no sclerotia, + few (< 20), ++ adequate (> 20), +++ many (> 50). 2 M: Mature sclerotia (>1 mm); − no sclerotia, * few (< 20), ** adequate (> 20), *** many (> 50).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Papadaki, A.; Diamantopoulou, P.; Papanikolaou, S.; Philippoussis, A. Evaluation of Biomass and Chitin Production of Morchella Mushrooms Grown on Starch-Based Substrates. Foods 2019, 8, 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8070239

AMA Style

Papadaki A, Diamantopoulou P, Papanikolaou S, Philippoussis A. Evaluation of Biomass and Chitin Production of Morchella Mushrooms Grown on Starch-Based Substrates. Foods. 2019; 8(7):239. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8070239

Chicago/Turabian Style

Papadaki, Aikaterini, Panagiota Diamantopoulou, Seraphim Papanikolaou, and Antonios Philippoussis. 2019. "Evaluation of Biomass and Chitin Production of Morchella Mushrooms Grown on Starch-Based Substrates" Foods 8, no. 7: 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8070239

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop