Next Article in Journal
Antioxidants in Food: The Significance of Characterisation, Identification, Chemical and Biological Assays in Determining the Role of Antioxidants in Food
Next Article in Special Issue
Application of a Surimi-Based Coating to Improve the Quality Attributes of Shrimp during Refrigerated Storage
Previous Article in Journal
Sodium Chloride and Its Influence on the Aroma Profile of Yeasted Bread
Article

Controlling Blown Pack Spoilage Using Anti-Microbial Packaging

1
Food Safety Department, Teagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin 15, Ireland
2
Food Packaging Group, School of Food & Nutritional Sciences, University College Cork, College Road, Cork, Ireland
3
School of Public Health, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2017, 6(8), 67; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods6080067
Received: 26 June 2017 / Revised: 9 August 2017 / Accepted: 10 August 2017 / Published: 12 August 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Edible Films Characterization and Application in Foods)
Active (anti-microbial) packaging was prepared using three different formulations; Auranta FV; Inbac-MDA and sodium octanoate at two concentrations (2.5 and 3.5 times their minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC, the lowest concentration that will inhibit the visible growth of the organisms) against Clostridium estertheticum, DSMZ 8809). Inoculated beef samples were packaged using the active packaging and monitored for 100 days storage at 2 °C for blown pack spoilage. The time to the onset of blown pack spoilage was significantly (p < 0.01) increased using Auranta FV and sodium octanoate (caprylic acid sodium salt) at both concentrations. Moreover, sodium octanoate packs had significantly (p < 0.01) delayed blown pack spoilage as compared to Auranta FV. It was therefore concluded that Auranta FV or sodium octanoate, incorporated into the packaging materials used for vacuum packaged beef, would inhibit blown pack spoilage and in the case of the latter, well beyond the 42 days storage period currently required for beef primals. View Full-Text
Keywords: blown pack spoilage; C. estertheticum; antimicrobials; gelatine films; edible coatings; active food packaging blown pack spoilage; C. estertheticum; antimicrobials; gelatine films; edible coatings; active food packaging
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Reid, R.; Bolton, D.; Tiuftin, A.A.; Kerry, J.P.; Fanning, S.; Whyte, P. Controlling Blown Pack Spoilage Using Anti-Microbial Packaging. Foods 2017, 6, 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods6080067

AMA Style

Reid R, Bolton D, Tiuftin AA, Kerry JP, Fanning S, Whyte P. Controlling Blown Pack Spoilage Using Anti-Microbial Packaging. Foods. 2017; 6(8):67. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods6080067

Chicago/Turabian Style

Reid, Rachael, Declan Bolton, Andrey A. Tiuftin, Joe P. Kerry, Séamus Fanning, and Paul Whyte. 2017. "Controlling Blown Pack Spoilage Using Anti-Microbial Packaging" Foods 6, no. 8: 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods6080067

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop