Effects of Gingerbread Cookie Enrichment with Native and Supercritical CO2-Defatted Burdock Seeds
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Plant Material
2.2. Extract Preparation for HPLC Analysis
2.3. HPLC Analysis
2.4. Gingerbread Cookie Ingredients
2.5. Production of Gingerbread Cookies
2.6. Determination of Proximate Composition of Gingerbread Cookies
2.7. Physical and Texture Analysis
2.8. Colour Measurement
2.9. Sensory Analysis
2.10. Storage Stability Study
2.11. Statistical Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. HPLC Analysis of Native and Defatted Burdock Seeds
3.2. Quality Attributes of Gingerbread Cookies
3.2.1. Proximate Composition
3.2.2. Mineral Content
3.2.3. Physical and Textural Properties
3.2.4. Colour Properties
3.2.5. Sensory Properties
3.3. Storage Test
3.3.1. Impact of Storage Conditions on Texture and Sensory Characteristics of Gingerbread Cookies
3.3.2. Storage Stability of Individual Phenolics
4. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Moro, T.M.A.; Clerici, M.T.P.S. Burdock (Arctium lappa L) Roots as a Source of Inulin-Type Fructans and Other Bioactive Compounds: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives for Food and Non-Food Applications. Food Res. Int. 2021, 141, 109889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shyam, M.; Sabina, E.P. Harnessing the Power of Arctium Lappa Root: A Review of Its Pharmacological Properties and Therapeutic Applications. Nat. Prod. Bioprospecting 2024, 14, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- European Medicines Agency. Community Herbal Monograph on Arctium lappa L., Radix. 2010. Available online: https://www.e-lactancia.org/media/papers/ArctiumBardanaBurdock-EMA2010.pdf (accessed on 15 January 2026).
- European Scientific Cooperative on Phytotherapy ESCOP Monograph. Arctii Radix–Burdock Root. 2016. Available online: https://www.escop.com/downloads/arctii/ (accessed on 15 January 2026).
- Physicians’ Desk Reference; PDR Network: Montvale, NJ, USA, 2013.
- Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China, 10th ed.; Chinese Medical Science and Technology Press: Beijing, China, 2015.
- Japanese Pharmacopoeia, 17th ed.; The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare: Tokyo, Japan, 2016.
- Pljevljakušić, D.; Živković, J.; Petričević, S.; Aradski, A.A.; Radan, M.; Šavikin, K.; Ristić, S. Dominant Lignan Profiles and Antidiabetic Activity of Thermally Treated and Non-Treated Burdock Seeds. Ind. Crops Prod. 2024, 211, 118206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Cai, Y.-Z.; Wong, R.N.S.; Lee, C.K.-F.; Tang, S.C.W.; Sze, S.C.W.; Tong, Y.; Zhang, Y. Comparative Analysis of Caffeoylquinic Acids and Lignans in Roots and Seeds among Various Burdock (Arctium lappa) Genotypes with High Antioxidant Activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 4067–4075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dziki, D.; Różyło, R.; Gawlik-Dziki, U.; Świeca, M. Current Trends in the Enhancement of Antioxidant Activity of Wheat Bread by the Addition of Plant Materials Rich in Phenolic Compounds. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 40, 48–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cory, H.; Passarelli, S.; Szeto, J.; Tamez, M.; Mattei, J. The Role of Polyphenols in Human Health and Food Systems: A Mini-Review. Front. Nutr. 2018, 5, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.H.; Lee, H.J.; Lee, H.-S.; Lim, E.-J.; Imm, J.-Y.; Suh, H.J. Physical and Sensory Characteristics of Fibre-Enriched Sponge Cakes Made with Opuntia Humifusa. LWT 2012, 47, 478–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zucco, F.; Borsuk, Y.; Arntfield, S.D. Physical and Nutritional Evaluation of Wheat Cookies Supplemented with Pulse Flours of Different Particle Sizes. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 44, 2070–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, B.R.; Choi, J.E.; Lee, J.H. Effect of Dried Hovenia Dulcis Fruit Powder on Quality Characteristics and Antioxidant Properties of Cookies. Korean J. Food Preserv. 2017, 24, 517–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.H. Physicochemical and Sensory Evaluation of Wheat Cookies Supplemented with Burdock Powder. Food Sci. Preserv. 2017, 24, 1053–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Kim, H.-Y.; Kim, K.-H.; Yook, H.-S. Quality Characteristics of Cookie with Burdock (Arctium lappa L.) Powder. Korean J. Food Cook. Sci. 2017, 33, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, D.; Bădărau, A.S.; Swamy, M.K.; Shaw, S.; Maggi, F.; da Silva, L.E.; López, V.; Yeung, A.W.K.; Mocan, A.; Atanasov, A.G. Arctium Species Secondary Metabolites Chemodiversity and Bioactivities. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- de Souza, A.R.C.; Guedes, A.R.; Rodriguez, J.M.F.; Bombardelli, M.C.M.; Corazza, M.L. Extraction of Arctium Lappa Leaves Using Supercritical CO2 + Ethanol: Kinetics, Chemical Composition, and Bioactivity Assessments. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2018, 140, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ivanišová, E.; Mošaťová, D.; Hlaváčová, Z.; Hlaváč, P.; Kunecová, D.; Gálik, B.; Čech, M.; Harangozo, Ľ.; Kubiak, P. Nutritional, Physical and Sensory Quality of Gingerbread Prepared Using Different Sweeteners. Agron. Res. 2023, 21, 280.6Kb. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Filipčev, B.; Šimurina, O.; Sakač, M.; Sedej, I.; Jovanov, P.; Pestorić, M.; Bodroža-Solarov, M. Feasibility of Use of Buckwheat Flour as an Ingredient in Ginger Nut Biscuit Formulation. Food Chem. 2011, 125, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AOAC Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 17th ed.; AOAC International: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2000.
- Tańska, M.; Roszkowska, B.; Czaplicki, S.; Borowska, E.J.; Bojarska, J.; Dąbrowska, A. Effect of Fruit Pomace Addition on Shortbread Cookies to Improve Their Physical and Nutritional Values. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2016, 71, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, Y.; Hu, J.; Wang, H.; Yan, Z.; Zhao, G.; Gao, X.; Li, W.; Qin, K. Establishing a UHPLC-MS/MS Method for Evaluation of the Influence of Stir-Frying on the Pharmacokinetics of Seven Compounds in Arctii Fructus. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 27525–27533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, Q.-D.; Qin, K.-M.; Shen, B.-J.; Cai, H.; Cai, B.-C. Optimization of the Processing Technology of Fructus Arctii by Response Surface Methodology. Chin. J. Nat. Med. 2015, 13, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition, and Allergies (NDA) Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for Carbohydrates and Dietary Fibre. EFSA J. 2010, 8, 1462. [CrossRef]
- European Parliament. Council of the European Union Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on Nutrition and Health Claims Made on Foods 2006. Available online: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eur/2006/1924/contents (accessed on 15 January 2026).
- Republic of Serbia. Regulation on Food Labelling, Presentation and Advertising. 2026. Available online: https://pravno-informacioni-sistem.rs/eli/rep/sgrs/ministarstva/pravilnik/2017/19/3/reg (accessed on 15 January 2026).
- Republic of Serbia. Regulation on Nutrition and Health Claims Made on Food Labelling. 2025. Available online: https://pravno-informacioni-sistem.rs/eli/rep/sgrs/ministarstva/pravilnik/2018/51/2/reg (accessed on 15 January 2026).
- Kweon, M.; Slade, L.; Levine, H.; Martin, R.; Souza, E. Exploration of Sugar Functionality in Sugar-Snap and Wire-Cut Cookie Baking: Implications for Potential Sucrose Replacement or Reduction. Cereal Chem. 2009, 86, 425–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, S.; Lee, C.; Mau, J.; Lin, L.; Chiou, S. Effect of Erythritol on Quality Characteristics of Reduced-calorie Danish Cookies. J. Food Qual. 2010, 33, 14–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zoulias, E.I.; Piknis, S.; Oreopoulou, V. Effect of Sugar Replacement by Polyols and Acesulfame-K on Properties of Low-Fat Cookies. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2000, 80, 2049–2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Winkelhausen, E.; Jovanovic-Malinovska, R.; Velickova, E.; Kuzmanova, S. Sensory and Microbiological Quality of a Baked Product Containing Xylitol as an Alternative Sweetener. Int. J. Food Prop. 2007, 10, 639–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mushtaq, Z.; Rehman, S.-; Zahoor, T.; Jamil, A. Impact of Xylitol Replacement on Physicochemical, Sensory and Microbial Quality of Cookies. Pak. J. Nutr. 2010, 9, 605–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Rutkowska, J.; Baranowski, D.; Antoniewska-Krzeska, A.; Kostyra, E. Comparison of Storage-Related Volatile Profiles and Sensory Properties of Cookies Containing Xylitol or Sucrose. Foods 2023, 12, 4270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, M.; Han, C.-W.; Li, M.; Song, X.-Q.; Sun, Q.-J.; Zhu, K.-X. Inhibiting Effect of Low-Molecular Weight Polyols on the Physico-Chemical and Structural Deteriorations of Gluten Protein during Storage of Fresh Noodles. Food Chem. 2019, 287, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaieb, K.; Hajlaoui, H.; Zmantar, T.; Kahla-Nakbi, A.B.; Rouabhia, M.; Mahdouani, K.; Bakhrouf, A. The Chemical Composition and Biological Activity of Clove Essential Oil, Eugenia Caryophyllata ( Syzigium Aromaticum L. Myrtaceae): A Short Review. Phytother. Res. 2007, 21, 501–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Czerny, M.; Schieberle, P. Important Aroma Compounds in Freshly Ground Wholemeal and White Wheat FlourIdentification and Quantitative Changes during Sourdough Fermentation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 6835–6840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Auvray, M.; Spence, C. The Multisensory Perception of Flavor. Conscious. Cogn. 2008, 17, 1016–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Garvey, E.C.; O’Sullivan, M.G.; Kerry, J.P.; Kilcawley, K.N. Factors Influencing the Sensory Perception of Reformulated Baked Confectionary Products. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 1160–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Laguna, L.; Varela, P.; Salvador, A.; Fiszman, S. A New Sensory Tool to Analyse the Oral Trajectory of Biscuits with Different Fat and Fibre Contents. Food Res. Int. 2013, 51, 544–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heenan, S.P.; Dufour, J.-P.; Hamid, N.; Harvey, W.; Delahunty, C.M. The Influence of Ingredients and Time from Baking on Sensory Quality and Consumer Freshness Perceptions in a Baked Model Cake System. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 43, 1032–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

| Code | Description |
|---|---|
| NBS | Native burdock seeds |
| DBS | Defatted burdock seeds |
| Suc-C | Control cookie with sucrose (0% burdock seeds) |
| Xyl-C | Control cookie with xylitol (0% burdock seeds) |
| Xyl -NBS | Cookie with xylitol and 5% native burdock seeds |
| Xyl -DBS | Cookie with xylitol and 5% defatted burdock seeds |
| Ingredients | Suc-C | Xyl-C | Xyl-NBS | Xyl-DBS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [g] | [g] | [g] | [g] | |
| Wholemeal spelt flour | 70 | 70 | 70 | 70 |
| Wholemeal rye flour | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| Sucrose | 35 | - | - | - |
| Xylitol | - | 35 | 35 | 35 |
| Honey | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Vegetable fat | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| NBS | - | - | 5 | - |
| DBS | - | - | - | 5 |
| Cocoa | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Spice mix 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Lecithin | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Sodium bicarbonate | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Water | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| Sensory Descriptors | Attribute Description | Scale Point Anchors (Min, Max) |
|---|---|---|
| Shape | Regularity | 1 (deformed) → 5 (non-deformed, regular) |
| Upper surface | Appearance of cookie top surface, presence of cracks, colour | 1 (smooth, burnt edges) → 5 (cracked, even, not burnt) |
| Fracture appearance | The way the cookie fractures when broken by hand, appearance of the fracture surface | 1 (crumbly, jagged) → 5 (non-crumbly, smooth) |
| Crumb structure | Crumb structure development (pore size and distribution) | 1 (dense, small pores, uneven) → 5 (well-developed pores, even) |
| Mastication | Sensations perceived during chewing and preparing for swallowing (food particle granulation, melting, disintegration, adhesion) | 1 (hard and coarse crumb particles, slow particle disintegration and melting, adhesion to teeth) → 5 (excellent mastication properties, even disintegration of particles, fast and even melting, absence of coarse particles, absence of adhesion) |
| Aroma | Perception of the intensity of the gingerbread spice mix (aromatic combination of cinnamon, nutmeg, cloves, and ginger providing a complex flavour of strong, sweet, nutty, and savoury notes) | 1 (absence) → 5 (highly pronounced) |
| Bitterly pungent aftertaste | Perception of the intensity of combined bitter notes similar to caffeine and peppery, warm, woody, and sharpness of cloves | 1 (highly pronounced) → 5 (absence) |
| Sample | Arctiin a | Arctigenin | Chlorogenic Acid | Isochlorogenic Acid |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [mg/g] | [mg/g] | [mg/g] | [mg/g] | |
| NBS | 68.30 ± 7.21 | 3.16 ± 0.52 a | 2.29 ± 0.31 | 7.01 ± 0.66 |
| DBS | 75.16 ± 7.89 | 0.70 ± 0.01 b | 2.63 ± 0.39 | 7.86 ± 0.82 |
| Formulation | Moisture a | Ash | Proteins | Fat | Total Reducing Sugars | Total Dietary Fibres | Soluble Dietary Fibres | Insoluble Dietary Fibres | Total Carbohydrates | Available Carbohydrates | Energy Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [%] | [%] | [g/100 g] | [g/100 g] | [g/100 g] | [g/100 g] | [g/100 g] | [g/100 g] | [g/100 g] | [g/100 g] | [kJ/100 g] | [kcal/100 g] | |
| Suc-C | 9.14 ± 0.21 b | 1.41 ± 0.06 | 8.61 ± 0.25 b | 11.90 ± 1.00 | 29.63 ± 2.11 a | 6.75 ± 0.42 | 0.15 ± 0.02 b | 6.60 ± 0.82 | 68.94 ± 3.48 | 62.19 ± 2.13 | 1813 | 431 |
| Xyl-C | 10.39 ± 0.24 a | 1.39 ± 0.06 | 9.36 ± 0.27 a | 12.18 ± 1.02 | 5.52 ± 0.39 b | 6.16 ± 0.77 | 0.11 ± 0.01 b | 6.05 ± 0.77 | 66.68 ± 3.05 | 60.52 ± 2.34 | 1793 | 426 |
| Xyl-NBS | 9.65 ± 0.23 ab | 1.47 ± 0.07 | 8.70 ± 0.25 b | 11.63 ± 0.98 | 3.60 ± 0.25 b | 7.93 ± 0.92 | 0.11 ± 0.01 b | 7.82 ± 0.98 | 68.55 ± 3.38 | 60.62 ± 1.98 | 1807 | 430 |
| Xyl-DBS | 8.98 ± 0.21 c | 1.55 ± 0.07 | 7.56 ± 0.22 c | 12.50 ± 1.05 | 6.49 ± 0.46 b | 6.72 ± 0.83 | 0.29 ± 0.04 a | 6.43 ± 0.80 | 69.41 ± 3.71 | 62.69 ± 2.38 | 1825 | 434 |
| Formulation | K a | Ca b | Mg | Fe | Zn | Cu | Mn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [mg/100 g dw] (% DRI) | [mg/100 g dw] (% DRI) | [mg/100 g dw] (% DRI) | [mg/100 g dw] (% DRI) | [mg/100 g dw] (% DRI) | [mg/100 g dw] (% DRI) | [mg/100 g dw] (% DRI) | |
| Suc-C | 191.7 ± 16.1 (9.6) | 27.2 ± 2.6 c (3.4) | 60.3 ± 4.8 (16.1) | 2.35 ± 2.22 (16.8) | 1.48 ± 1.19 (14.8) | 0.42 ± 0.02 (42.0) | 1.34 ± 0.10 (67.0) |
| Xyl-C | 189.6 ± 15.6 (9.5) | 26.1 ± 2.0 c (3.3) | 60.4 ± 4.7 (16.1) | 2.31 ± 2.17 (16.5) | 1.47 ± 1.20 (14.7) | 0.40 ± 0.30 (40.0) | 1.33 ± 1.16 (66.5) |
| Xyl-BS | 194.1 ± 15.9 (9.7) | 57.3 ± 4.4 b (7.2) | 70.8 ± 5.5 (18.9) | 3.02 ± 2.32 (21.6) | 1.75 ± 1.35 (17.5) | 0.44 ± 0.03 (44.0) | 1.39 ± 0.12 (69.5) |
| Xyl-DBS | 197.9 ± 16.2 (9.9) | 63.7 ± 4.9 a (8.0) | 69.8 ± 5.4 (18.6) | 2.63 ± 0.20 (18.8) | 1.67 ± 1.28 (16.7) | 0.39 ± 0.30 (39.0) | 1.38 ± 1.15 (69.0) |
| Formulation | Spread a | Specific Volume | Hardness | Fracturability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [DH Ratio] b | [g/mL] | [g × s] | [g × s] | |
| Suc-C | 3.56 ± 0.13 a | 1.59 ± 0.04 a | 3685.23 ± 644.38 a | 1241.13 ± 124.67 a |
| Xyl-C | 2.76 ± 0.22 bc | 1.50 ± 0.02 b | 1905.43 ± 219.05 b | 921.22 ± 14.22 b |
| Xyl-NBS | 2.58 ± 0.11 c | 1.39 ± 0.03 c | 2337.29 ± 256.70 b | 1004.83 ± 42.32 b |
| Xyl-DBS | 2.95 ± 0.11 b | 1.48 ± 0.02 b | 1803.38 ± 170.58 b | 930.13 ± 14.17 b |
| Formulation | L* a | a* | b* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Suc-C | 35.37 ± 0.67 a | 15.03 ± 0.39 a | 23.03 ± 0.40 a |
| Xyl-C | 34.31 ± 1.66 ab | 14.57 ± 0.20 a | 20.62 ± 0.56 b |
| Xyl-NBS | 32.81 ± 2.36 ab | 13.08 ± 0.57 b | 18.17 ± 1.25 c |
| Xyl-DBS | 31.85 ± 1.73 b | 13.09 ± 0.51 b | 18.42 ± 1.02 c |
| Formulation | Appearance a | Upper Surface | Fracture | Structure at Fracture | Mastication | Aroma | Bitterly Pungent Aftertaste | Total Score | Quality Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Coef. 0.5] | [Coef. 0.5] | [Coef. 0.6] | [Coef. 0.6] | [Coef. 0.8] | [Coef. 1] | [Coef. 1] | |||
| Suc-C | 3.90 ± 0.76 | 3.60 ± 0.74 | 3.52 ± 0.73 | 3.95 ± 0.89 | 3.92 ± 0.61 | 4.30 ± 0.73 | 4.33 ± 0.82 | 19.65 ± 1.94 | Good |
| Xyl-C | 3.60 ± 0.63 | 3.87 ± 0.74 | 3.15 ± 0.89 | 3.45 ± 0.81 | 4.03 ± 0.88 | 3.97 ± 0.72 | 4.13 ± 0.92 | 18.90 ± 2.66 | Good |
| Xyl-NBS | 3.67 ± 0.84 | 3.87 ± 0.77 | 3.37 ± 0.77 | 3.33 ± 0.72 | 4.07 ± 0.78 | 3.80 ± 0.77 | 3.63 ± 1.08 | 18.53 ± 2.58 | Good |
| Xyl-DBS | 4.03 ± 0.61 | 3.59 ± 0.73 | 3.55 ± 1.10 | 3.73 ± 0.96 | 4.07 ± 0.88 | 3.87 ± 0.93 | 3.20 ± 1.08 | 18.33 ± 2.63 | Good |
| Formulation | Storage Conditions | Arctiin a | Arctigenin | Cholorogenic Acid | Isochlorogenic Acid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [μg/g] | [μg/g] | [μg/g] | [μg/g] | ||
| Xyl-NBS | Day 0 | 1099.18 ± 67.52 | 572.58 ± 29.29 | 43.30 ± 5.62 | 460.35 ± 40.28 |
| Day 60 (25 °C, light) | 922.72 ± 67.04 | 600.66 ± 65.87 | 39.97 ± 3.29 | 475.55 ± 24.39 | |
| Day 60 (25 °C, dark) | 966.75 ± 127.60 | 603.36 ± 86.73 | 40.97 ± 4.52 | 457.80 ± 66.46 | |
| Day 60 (40 °C, dark) | 937.99 ± 91.45 | 594.35 ± 51.12 | 40.78 ± 5.66 | 471.76 ± 29.78 | |
| Day 60 (4 °C, dark) | 977.30 ± 81.38 | 568.77 ± 65.87 | 42.42 ± 5.13 | 481.71 ± 44.89 | |
| Xyl-DBS | Day 0 | 1362.83 ± 155.99 | 199.94 ± 13.47 | 36.66 ± 4.07 | 458.83 ± 38.45 |
| Day 60 (25 °C, light) | 1332.20 ± 136.62 | 201.17 ± 10.14 | 34.32 ± 3.06 | 444.64 ± 58.79 | |
| Day 60 (25 °C, dark) | 1390.62 ± 121.88 | 214.62 ± 31.43 | 36.90 ± 3.61 | 463.26 ± 51.47 | |
| Day 60 (40 °C, dark) | 1340.76 ± 145.85 | 194.35 ± 22.07 | 37.62 ± 4.97 | 467.31 ± 46.97 | |
| Day 60 (4 °C, dark) | 1304.88 ± 139.62 | 192.56 ± 18.33 | 36.95 ± 4.52 | 474.97 ± 35.95 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Šavikin, K.; Živković, J.; Pljevljakušić, D.; Šimurina, O.; Filipčev, B.; Vujasinović, V.; Dimitrieska Stojkovikj, E.; Veličkovska, S.K. Effects of Gingerbread Cookie Enrichment with Native and Supercritical CO2-Defatted Burdock Seeds. Foods 2026, 15, 1115. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15071115
Šavikin K, Živković J, Pljevljakušić D, Šimurina O, Filipčev B, Vujasinović V, Dimitrieska Stojkovikj E, Veličkovska SK. Effects of Gingerbread Cookie Enrichment with Native and Supercritical CO2-Defatted Burdock Seeds. Foods. 2026; 15(7):1115. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15071115
Chicago/Turabian StyleŠavikin, Katarina, Jelena Živković, Dejan Pljevljakušić, Olivera Šimurina, Bojana Filipčev, Vesna Vujasinović, Elizabeta Dimitrieska Stojkovikj, and Sanja Kostadinović Veličkovska. 2026. "Effects of Gingerbread Cookie Enrichment with Native and Supercritical CO2-Defatted Burdock Seeds" Foods 15, no. 7: 1115. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15071115
APA StyleŠavikin, K., Živković, J., Pljevljakušić, D., Šimurina, O., Filipčev, B., Vujasinović, V., Dimitrieska Stojkovikj, E., & Veličkovska, S. K. (2026). Effects of Gingerbread Cookie Enrichment with Native and Supercritical CO2-Defatted Burdock Seeds. Foods, 15(7), 1115. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15071115

