Probiotic Potential of Weizmannia coagulans MA42, an Endospore-Forming Probiotic Bacterium Capable of Dietary Fiber Digestion
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Bacterial Strains and Culture Conditions
2.2. Resistance to Simulated Gastrointestinal Conditions
2.3. Cell Surface Hydrophobicity
2.4. Auto-Aggregation
2.5. Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity Against Pathogenic Bacteria
2.6. Antibiotic Susceptibility Test
2.7. Hemolytic Activity Test
2.8. Digestive-Enzyme-Producing Test
2.9. Evaluation of Dietary-Fiber Carbohydrates Fermentaion
2.10. Enzyme Assay
2.11. Viability of Probiotic Strains After Freeze-Drying
2.12. Statistical Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Survival Against Simulated Gastrointestinal Conditions
3.2. Auto-Aggregation and Hydrophobicity
3.3. Antimicrobial Activity Against Pathogenic Bacteria
3.4. Antibiotic Susceptibility
3.5. Hemolytic Activity
3.6. Digestive-Enzyme Activity
3.7. Fermentation of Dietary-Fiber Carbohydrates
3.8. Viability of Probiotic Strains Against Freeze-Drying
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Chen, L.; Ning, C.; Ma, L.; Wang, M.; Zhao, Y.; Li, S.; Zhao, Z. Harnessing the potential of postbiotics derived from Bacillus coagulans: A promising avenue for obesity management via the gut-liver axis. Food Biosci. 2023, 56, 103108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arsène, M.M.J.; Davares, A.K.L.; Andreevna, S.L.; Vladimirovich, E.A.; Carime, B.Z.; Marouf, R.; Khelifi, I. The use of probiotics in animal feeding for safe production and as potential alternatives to antibiotics. Vet. World 2021, 14, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sui, L.; Zhu, X.; Wu, D.; Ma, T.; Tuo, Y.; Jiang, S.; Qian, F.; Mu, G. In vitro assessment of probiotic and functional properties of Bacillus coagulans T242. Food Biosci. 2020, 36, 100675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Li, P.; Lee, S.; Wang, Y.; Tan, C.; Shang, N. Weizmannia coagulans: An ideal probiotic for gut health. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2024, 13, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ford, A.C.; Quigley, E.M.M.; Lacy, B.E.; Lembo, A.J.; Saito, Y.A.; Schiller, L.R.; Soffer, E.E.; Spiegel, B.M.R.; Moayyedi, P. Efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics in irritable bowel syndrome and chronic idiopathic constipation: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 109, 1547–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mai, X.-X.; Huang, F.; Feng, W.-J.; Zhang, X.; Li, J.; Huang, Y.-Y.; Zeng, X.-A. Weizmannia coagulans: Screening, functional properties, and current applications in the food industry. Food Rev. Int. 2025, 41, 2184–2202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morsli, D.S.; Tbahriti, H.F.; Rahli, F.; Mahammi, F.Z.; Nagdalian, A.; Hemeg, H.A.; Imran, M.; Rauf, A.; Shariati, M.A. Probiotics in colorectal cancer prevention and therapy: Mechanisms, benefits, and challenges. Discov. Oncol. 2025, 16, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haffner, F.B.; Diab, R.; Pasc, A. Encapsulation of probiotics: Insights into academic and industrial approaches. AIMS Mater. Sci. 2016, 3, 114–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazhar, S.; Simon, A.; Khokhlova, E.; Colom, J.; Leeuwendaal, N.; Deaton, J.; Rea, K. In vitro safety and functional characterization of the novel Bacillus coagulans strain CGI314. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 14, 1302480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Colom, J.; Freitas, D.; Simon, A.; Brodkorb, A.; Buckley, M.; Deaton, J.; Winger, A.M. Presence and germination of the probiotic Bacillus subtilis DE111® in the human small intestinal tract: A randomized, crossover, double-blind, and placebo-controlled study. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 715863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, J.; Yu, Z.; Liu, W.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhai, Q.; Chen, W. Probiotic characteristics of Bacillus coagulans and associated implications for human health and diseases. J. Funct. Foods 2020, 64, 103643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konuray, G.; Erginkaya, Z. Potential use of Bacillus coagulans in the food industry. Foods 2018, 7, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pamueangmun, P.; Abdullahi, A.D.; Kabir, M.H.; Unban, K.; Kanpiengjai, A.; Venus, J.; Shetty, K.; Saenjum, C.; Khanongnuch, C. Lignocellulose degrading Weizmannia coagulans capable of enantiomeric L-lactic acid production via consolidated bioprocessing. Fermentation 2023, 9, 761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Minamida, K.; Nishimura, M.; Miwa, K.; Nishihira, J. Effects of dietary fiber with Bacillus coagulans lilac-01 on bowel movement and fecal properties of healthy volunteers with a tendency for constipation. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2015, 79, 300–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- da Costa Cardoso, P.I.F.; Grisi, C.V.B.; de Andrade Vieira, É.; de Almeida, D.K.L.; Cardarelli, H.R. Cereal flours with Bacillus coagulans and beta-glucan: Technological properties and sensory acceptability. Food Chem. 2024, 448, 139146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Unban, K.; Chaichana, W.; Baipong, S.; Abdullahi, A.D.; Kanpiengjai, A.; Shetty, K.; Khanongnuch, C. Probiotic and antioxidant properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from indigenous fermented tea leaves (Miang) of north Thailand and promising application in synbiotic formulation. Fermentation 2021, 7, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- CLSI. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically, 11th ed.; Clinical Laboratory Science Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2018; Volume 38, pp. 1–62. [Google Scholar]
- Li, L.; Zhao, Y.; Li, J.; Ban, L.; Yang, L.; Wang, S.; Zhu, L.; Song, H.; Liu, H. The adhesion of the gut microbiota to insoluble dietary fiber from soy hulls promoted the proliferation of probiotics in vitro. LWT 2022, 153, 112560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Unban, K.; Kanpiengjai, A.; Khatthongngam, N.; Saenjum, C.; Khanongnuch, C. Simultaneous bioconversion of gelatinized starchy waste from the rice noodle manufacturing process to lactic acid and maltose-forming α-amylase by Lactobacillus plantarum S21, using a low-cost medium. Fermentation 2019, 5, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blanco, A.S.; Durive, O.P.; Pérez, S.B.; Montes, Z.D.; Guerra, N.P. Simultaneous production of amylases and proteases by Bacillus subtilis in brewery wastes. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2016, 47, 665–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sriphannam, W.; Unban, K.; Ashida, H.; Yamamoto, K.; Khanongnuch, C. Medium component improvement for β-galactosidase production by a probiotic strain Lactobacillus fermentum CM33. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 11242–11251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amoah, K.; Huang, Q.-C.; Tan, B.-P.; Zhang, S.; Chi, S.-Y.; Yang, Q.-H.; Liu, H.-Y.; Dong, X.-H. Dietary supplementation of probiotic Bacillus coagulans ATCC 7050, improves the growth performance, intestinal morphology, microflora, immune response, and disease confrontation of Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019, 87, 796–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balakrishna, A. In vitro evaluation of adhesion and aggregation abilities of four potential probiotic strains isolated from guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2013, 56, 793–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zawistowska-Rojek, A.; Kośmider, A.; Stępień, K.; Tyski, S. Adhesion and aggregation properties of Lactobacillaceae strains as protection ways against enteropathogenic bacteria. Arch. Microbiol. 2022, 204, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kahraman, B.; KIYMAZ, B.; Dertli, E.; Arici, M. A comparative study of Bacillus spp. isolated from various sources and commercial food supplements and evaluation of some probiotic properties. J. Tekirdag Agric. Fac. 2024, 21, 256–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nithya, V.; Halami, P.M. Evaluation of the probiotic characteristics of Bacillus species isolated from different food sources. Ann. Microbiol. 2013, 63, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arrioja-Bretón, D.; Mani-López, E.; Palou, E.; López-Malo, A. Antimicrobial activity and storage stability of cell-free supernatants from lactic acid bacteria and their applications with fresh beef. Food Control 2020, 115, 107286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bang, W.Y.; Ban, O.-H.; Lee, B.S.; Oh, S.; Park, C.; Park, M.-K.; Jung, S.K.; Yang, J.; Jung, Y.H. Genomic-, phenotypic-, and toxicity-based safety assessment and probiotic potency of Bacillus coagulans IDCC 1201 isolated from green malt. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 48, kuab026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saroj, D.B.; Gupta, A.K. Genome based safety assessment for Bacillus coagulans strain LBSC (DSM 17654) for probiotic application. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 318, 108523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Gu, Z.; Zhang, S.; Li, P. Complete genome sequencing revealed the potential application of a novel Weizmannia coagulans PL-W production with promising bacteriocins in food preservative. Foods 2023, 12, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aulitto, M.; Strazzulli, A.; Sansone, F.; Cozzolino, F.; Monti, M.; Moracci, M.; Fiorentino, G.; Limauro, D.; Bartolucci, S.; Contursi, P. Prebiotic properties of Bacillus coagulans MA-13: Production of galactoside hydrolyzing enzymes and characterization of the transglycosylation properties of a GH42 β-galactosidase. Microb. Cell Fact. 2021, 20, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.-S.; Kim, T.-Y.; Kim, Y.; Lee, S.-H.; Kim, S.; Kang, S.W.; Yang, J.-Y.; Baek, I.-J.; Sung, Y.H.; Park, Y.-Y. Microbiota-derived lactate accelerates intestinal stem-cell-mediated epithelial development. Cell Host Microbe 2018, 24, 833–846.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keong, L.Y.E.; Toh, M.; Lu, Y.; Liu, S.-Q. Biotransformation of okara (soybean residue) through solid-state fermentation using probiotic Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus coagulans. Food Bioscience 2023, 55, 103056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, S.; Xu, P.; Tao, F. L-Lactic acid production by Bacillus coagulans through simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of lignocellulosic corncob residue. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2019, 6, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ou, M.S.; Ingram, L.O.; Shanmugam, K.T. L (+)-Lactic acid production from non-food carbohydrates by thermotolerant Bacillus coagulans. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 38, 599–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X.; Shi, Z.; Wang, T.; Meng, X.; Song, L.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Wei, T. Fermentative l-lactic acid production using Bacillus coagulans from corn stalk deconstructed by an anaerobic microbial community. Fermentation 2023, 9, 611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiao, J.; Dong, B.; Li, Y.; Zhang, B.; Cao, Y. Cloning of a β-1, 3-1, 4-glucanase gene from Bacillus subtilis MA139 and its functional expression in Escherichia coli. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2009, 152, 334–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, F.; Xu, P. Genomic analysis of thermophilic Bacillus coagulans strains: Efficient producers for platform bio-chemicals. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 3926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Crittenden, R.; Karppinen, S.; Ojanen, S.; Tenkanen, M.; Fagerström, R.; Mättö, J.; Saarela, M.; Mattila-Sandholm, T.; Poutanen, K. In vitro fermentation of cereal dietary fibre carbohydrates by probiotic and intestinal bacteria. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2002, 82, 781–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marotti, I.; Bregola, V.; Aloisio, I.; Di Gioia, D.; Bosi, S.; Di Silvestro, R.; Quinn, R.; Dinelli, G. Prebiotic effect of soluble fibres from modern and old durum-type wheat varieties on Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2012, 92, 2133–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Gandhi, N.N. Complete genomic sequence of Bacillus coagulans strain JBI-YZ6. 3: A natural spore-forming isolate from food-grade tapioca starch. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2023, 12, e01003-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Oluwatosin, S.O.; Tai, S.L.; Fagan-Endres, M.A. Sucrose, maltodextrin and inulin efficacy as cryoprotectant, preservative and prebiotic—Towards a freeze dried Lactobacillus plantarum topical probiotic. Biotechnol. Rep. 2022, 33, e00696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kandasamy, S.; Naveen, R. A review on the encapsulation of bioactive components using spray-drying and freeze-drying techniques. J. Food Process Eng. 2022, 45, e14059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aschenbrenner, M.; Foerst, P.; Kulozik, U. Freeze-drying of Probiotics. In Advances in Probiotic Technology; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015; pp. 213–241. [Google Scholar]






| Antibiotic | Inhibition Zone Diameters (mm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATCC 7050 | MA42 | P13 | S5 | |
| Streptomycin (10 μg) | 33.00 ± 1.00 b | 23.00 ± 0.00 d | 37.50 ± 1.50 a | 27.00 ± 0.00 c |
| Zone diameter interpretive criteria | S | S | S | S |
| Erythromycin (15 μg) | 44.00 ± 1.00 a | 39.50 ± 0.50 bc | 37.50 ± 1.50 c | 41.00 ± 0.00 b |
| Zone diameter interpretive criteria | S | S | S | S |
| Kanamycin (30 μg) | 31.00 ± 1.00 b | 26.50 ± 0.50 c | 40.00 ± 0.00 a | 30.50 ± 0.50 b |
| Zone diameter interpretive criteria | S | S | S | S |
| Vancomycin (30 μg) | 32.50 ± 0.50 b | 26.50 ± 0.50 c | 31.00 ± 1.00 b | 35.00 ± 0.00 a |
| Zone diameter interpretive criteria | S | S | S | S |
| Gentamicin (10 μg) | 34.50 ± 0.50 a | 26.00 ± 1.00 b | 35.00 ± 0.00 a | 32.50 ± 1.50 a |
| Zone diameter interpretive criteria | S | S | S | S |
| Polymyxin-B (300 units) | 35.00 ± 0.00 b | 26.50 ± 0.50 c | 39.50 ± 0.50 a | 39.00 ± 1.00 a |
| Zone diameter interpretive criteria | S | S | S | S |
| Strains | Activity of Enzymes (mU/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Amylase | Protease | β-Galactosidase | |
| W. coagulans MA42 | 613.00 ± 37.15 c | 20.57 ± 1.51 c | 7.94 ± 0.92 c |
| W. coagulans P13 | 856.48 ± 24.31 a | 97.33 ± 3.04 a | 13.69 ± 0.55 b |
| W. coagulans S5 | 712.45 ± 31.72 b | 50.17 ± 2.20 b | 8.22 ± 0.55 c |
| W. coagulans ATCC 7050 | 631.00 ± 15.19 c | 92.82 ± 1.57 a | 21.36 ± 0.83 a |
| Substrate | W. coagulans MA42 | W. coagulans ATCC 7050 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lactic Acid (g/L) | Acetic Acid (g/L) | Lactic Acid (g/L) | Acetic Acid (g/L) | |
| Complex Dietary component/ingredient | ||||
| Wheat flour | 2.24 ± 0.1 f | 0.19 ± 0.1 ab | 0.80 ± 0.0 ij | 0.19 ± 0.1 ab |
| Oatmeal | 2.23 ± 0.1 f | 0.22 ± 0.0 ab | 0.96 ± 0.0 hi | 0.33 ± 0.0 a |
| Xylan | 2.42 ± 0.1 f | 0.21 ± 0.1 ab | 0.84 ± 0.0 ij | 0.21 ± 0.1 ab |
| CMC | 2.44 ± 0.1 ef | 0.23 ± 0.1 a | 0.92 ± 0.0 hi | 0.26 ± 0.1 a |
| LBG | 2.31 ± 0.1 f | 0.02 ± 0.0 c | 0.54 ± 0.1 j | 0.01 ± 0.0 c |
| Xanthan gum | 2.70 ± 0.1 de | 0.06 ± 0.0 bc | 0.81 ± 0.0 ij | 0.02 ± 0.0 c |
| Pectin | 2.86 ± 0.0 cd | 0.14 ± 0.1 abc | 1.29 ± 0.0 g | 0.24 ± 0.1 a |
| Inulin | 2.22 ± 0.1 f | 0.13 ± 0.0 abc | 1.14 ± 0.0 gh | 0.20 ± 0.1 ab |
| Prebiotic | ||||
| XOS | 2.34 ± 0.1 f | 0.14 ± 0.0 abc | 0.99 ± 0.1 hi | 0.20 ± 0.1 ab |
| FOS | 2.97 ± 0.1 c | 0.25 ± 0.1 a | 1.00 ± 0.1 hi | 0.29 ± 0.0 a |
| GOS | 2.41 ± 0.1 f | 0.21 ± 0.1 ab | 0.90 ± 0.0 hi | 0.21 ± 0.1 ab |
| Control | ||||
| Glucose | 7.57 ± 0.1 a | 0.17 ± 0.0 abc | 6.32 ± 0.1 b | 0.29 ± 0.0 a |
| Strains | Viable Cell (Log CFU) | Survival Rate (%) | Recovery Yield (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before Freeze-Drying | After Freeze-Drying | |||
| W. coagulans MA42 | 7.77 ± 0.19 | 7.54 ± 0.12 | 97.03 ± 0.13 b | 90.12 ± 0.96 b |
| W. coagulans P13 | 7.67 ± 0.15 | 7.60 ± 0.07 | 99.20 ± 0.12 a | 93.80 ± 0.24 a |
| W. coagulans S5 | 7.29 ± 0.30 | 6.92 ± 0.26 | 94.89 ± 0.14 c | 90.51 ± 0.96 b |
| W. coagulans ATCC 7050 | 7.58 ± 0.13 | 6.98 ± 0.32 | 95.06 ± 0.14 c | 91.00 ± 0.90 b |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Pamueangmun, P.; Kham, N.N.N.; Kanpiengjai, A.; Saenjum, C.; Shetty, K.; Unban, K.; Khanongnuch, C. Probiotic Potential of Weizmannia coagulans MA42, an Endospore-Forming Probiotic Bacterium Capable of Dietary Fiber Digestion. Foods 2026, 15, 710. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15040710
Pamueangmun P, Kham NNN, Kanpiengjai A, Saenjum C, Shetty K, Unban K, Khanongnuch C. Probiotic Potential of Weizmannia coagulans MA42, an Endospore-Forming Probiotic Bacterium Capable of Dietary Fiber Digestion. Foods. 2026; 15(4):710. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15040710
Chicago/Turabian StylePamueangmun, Punnita, Nang Nwet Noon Kham, Apinun Kanpiengjai, Chalermphong Saenjum, Kalidas Shetty, Kridsada Unban, and Chartchai Khanongnuch. 2026. "Probiotic Potential of Weizmannia coagulans MA42, an Endospore-Forming Probiotic Bacterium Capable of Dietary Fiber Digestion" Foods 15, no. 4: 710. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15040710
APA StylePamueangmun, P., Kham, N. N. N., Kanpiengjai, A., Saenjum, C., Shetty, K., Unban, K., & Khanongnuch, C. (2026). Probiotic Potential of Weizmannia coagulans MA42, an Endospore-Forming Probiotic Bacterium Capable of Dietary Fiber Digestion. Foods, 15(4), 710. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15040710

