Next Article in Journal
From Ethnobotany to Food Innovation: Applications and Functional Potential of Mashua (Tropaeolum tuberosum)
Previous Article in Journal
Differences in Flavour Compounds and Key Metabolic Markers in High-Quality Broiler Rooster Breast Muscle Based on Broad-Target Metabolomics and Volatile Metabolomics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Host Dietary Nutrients Shape GH32-Mediated Microbial Responses to Prebiotic Fructans: A Randomized Trial

1
Graduate School of Nutritional Sciences, Nagoya University of Arts and Sciences, Nisshin 470-0196, Japan
2
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan
3
BIOSIS Lab. Co., Ltd., Toyoake 470-1192, Japan
4
Department of Medical Research on Prebiotics and Probiotics, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan
5
WELLNEO SUGAR Co., Ltd., Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-8536, Japan
6
Department of Applied Biosciences, Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2025, 14(23), 4090; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14234090
Submission received: 8 October 2025 / Revised: 12 November 2025 / Accepted: 18 November 2025 / Published: 28 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Food Microbiology)

Abstract

Prebiotics, such as short- and long-chain fructans, beneficially modulate the microbiota; however, individual variability in response remains unclear. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 40 healthy adults received either a combined fructan supplement—1-Kestose (Kes) and inulin (Inu)—or a placebo (maltose + cornstarch) for 4 weeks. We investigated the fecal microbiome, bacterial growth, and glycoside hydrolase family 32 (GH32) gene abundance, and further examined the association between dietary intake and GH32. Kes and Inu co-supplementation selectively increased Bifidobacterium adolescentis and B. longum, harboring the GH32 genes inuA and cscA, respectively. Growth assays revealed that B. longum, which expresses cscA, grew only on Kes, whereas B. adolescentis, which expresses inuA, showed growth on Kes and Inu. Only responders—participants showing increases in both species—exhibited consistent upregulation of GH32 genes and were associated with higher retinol and C16:3 (n-6) fatty acid intake, as well as greater green leafy vegetable and canned tuna consumption. This study provides insights into species level responses to prebiotics, supporting personalized dietary strategies for gut microbiota modulation.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The gut microbiota plays an essential role in maintaining metabolic, immune, and neural homeostasis of the host. Dysbiosis, which refers to the disruptions in the composition and function of the microbiota, has been strongly associated with a wide range of diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), obesity, type 2 diabetes, autism spectrum disorders, cancer, allergic diseases, and liver disorders [1,2,3]. Owing to its close association with these conditions, increasing attention has been directed toward interventions targeting the gut microbiota. Among various strategies that are aimed at modulating the gut microbiota, dietary intake of prebiotics has gained considerable interest. A prebiotic is defined as “a selectively fermented ingredient that results in specific changes in the composition and/or activity of the gastrointestinal microbiota, thus conferring benefit(s) upon host health” [4]. Prebiotics have been extensively studied as part of dietary interventions aimed at disease prevention and maintenance of health. Recent studies have demonstrated that prebiotics not only improve dysbiosis but also exert beneficial effects on various disease conditions [5].
Fructans represent one of the most well-characterized classes of prebiotics. They consist of linear chains of fructose units linked to a sucrose molecule via β (2→1) glycosidic bonds. Fructans vary in their degree of polymerization (DP), with short-chain fructans known as fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) and long-chain fructans referred to as inulin (Inu). Short- and long-chain fructans exhibit distinct fermentation characteristics, with different bacterial species responsible for their degradation depending on the DP [6,7].
Among FOS, 1-Kestose (Kes, DP = 3) has been shown to strongly promote the growth of Bifidobacterium species, with greater efficacy than other FOS such as Nystose (DP = 4) [8,9]. Intervention studies in humans have indicated that Kes intake modulates gut microbiota and provides physiological benefits, including reductions in fasting insulin levels [10,11]; alleviation of allergic and atopic symptoms [12,13]; and improvements in IBD [14], sarcopenia [15], and pancreatic cancer [16]. Moreover, long-chain fructans such as Inu (DP up to 60) have been reported to improve metabolic syndrome [17], obesity and dyslipidemia [18], and metabolic-associated fatty liver disease [19], as well as enhance calcium absorption [20].
Both short- and long-chain fructans are metabolized by gut bacteria such as Bifidobacterium spp. through the action of enzymes belonging to the glycoside hydrolase family 32 (GH32). However, the presence and activity of GH32 genes vary among bacterial species [21]. These species-specific differences may contribute to a complementary and broader activation of the gut microbiota when short- and long-chain fructans are co-administered. Our previous study demonstrated that combined intake of Kes and Inu synergistically enhanced their preventive and therapeutic effects in an allergic mouse model [22,23]. Similarly, a human trial showed that their co-administration promoted calcium absorption and increased bone mineral density [24]. Although several studies have examined the effects of combined administration of short- and long-chain fructans, no human study has yet comprehensively investigated how the gut microbiota responds to their co-administration.
Considerable inter-individual variability has been observed in gut microbiota responses to prebiotics. Recent evidence suggests that this variability may be influenced by host dietary patterns and nutrient intake status [25]. However, studies that simultaneously evaluate interactions between prebiotics and dietary factors in shaping the gut microbiota remain scarce.
Therefore, in the present study, we conducted a double-blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) in healthy adults to comprehensively assess changes in the gut microbiota following combined intake of Kes and Inu. We focused on bacterial species harboring GH32 family enzymes that are involved in fructan degradation to elucidate their association with individual responsiveness to prebiotics. Additionally, dietary intake was assessed in participants who showed marked shifts in gut microbiota composition, to explore how dietary factors may influence the relationship between prebiotics and gut microbial responses.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Approval

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nagoya University of Arts and Sciences (approval number: 772). The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Biological Research Involving Human Subjects in Japan. The protocol was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) (registration number: jRCT1041240180).

2.2. Study Design and Participants

Overall, 40 healthy adult volunteers were enrolled in this RCT. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) no current diagnosis of any gastrointestinal disorder; (2) no intake of probiotic or prebiotic supplements within the past week; and (3) no antibiotic use within the past week. All participants provided written informed consent after receiving a full explanation of the study objectives and procedures, and their personal information was anonymized to ensure confidentiality.

2.3. Randomization and Blinding

Participants who met all inclusion criteria were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the prebiotic or placebo group based on random numbers generated using Microsoft Excel, following the method of Oe et al. [26]. Randomization was performed by an independent university staff member not involved in the study. Allocation concealment was maintained using a password-protected file, and both participants and investigators were blinded to group assignments throughout the intervention period.

2.4. Intervention and Study Procedure

Participants in the prebiotic group (Prebio group) received a mixture of fructans consisting of 3 g/day of Kes (DP3, 98% purity; Itochu Sugar Co., Ltd., Hekinan, Japan) and 3 g/day of Inu (average DP 8-13; Inulia®, Teijin, Japan) for 4 weeks. Participants of the placebo group received 3 g/day of maltose (food-grade; Awajiya, Osaka, Japan) and 3 g/day of cornstarch (food-grade; Hinokunishokuhin, Kumamoto, Japan). All powders were pre-weighed, mixed, and packed in weekly doses in opaque aluminum sachets to maintain blinding. Participants were instructed to consume 6 g/day.
At baseline (week 0), participants completed a dietary assessment using the Brief Self-administered Diet History Questionnaire (BDHQ) [27,28]. Fecal samples were collected at weeks 0 and 4 using FS-0015 collection kits (TechnoSuruga Laboratory Co., Ltd., Shizuoka, Japan). Participants were instructed to maintain their usual dietary and lifestyle habits during the intervention. Adverse events and study withdrawals were monitored throughout the study period.

2.5. DNA Extraction and 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

DNA was extracted from fecal samples using the QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 16S rRNA gene sequencing was conducted in accordance with previously established methods [29]. Specifically, the V3–V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified using primers Pro341F and Pro805R (Supplementary Table S1). PCR amplification was performed using TaKaRa Ex Taq® Hot Start Version (Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan) under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 2 min; 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s; followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min.
Indexed libraries were then prepared and sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform (2 × 300 bp paired-end reads) using the MiSeq Reagent Kit v3. Sequencing was performed by Bioengineering Lab Co., Ltd. (Sagamihara, Japan). The 16S rRNA gene NGS datasets were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) (accession number: PRJNA1301572).

2.6. Bioinformatics Analysis

Bioinformatics analysis was conducted according to previously established methods [23]. Specifically, sequence data were analyzed using QIIME2 (version 2022.2) [30]. Quality filtering and denoising were performed using the DADA2 plugin with the following parameters (p-trunc-len-f = 240 and p-trunc-len-r = 240) [31]. Taxonomic classification was performed using the qiime feature-classifier classify-sklearn command with default parameters [32], and taxonomy was assigned based on the Greengenes2 reference database (version 2022.10) [33]. Alpha diversity indices were calculated, and principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) was conducted using weighted UniFrac distances. Beta diversity was evaluated using the qiime diversity beta-group-significance command.

2.7. Quantitative Analysis of Fecal Microorganisms Using Quantitative PCR

We aligned the nucleotide sequences of GH32 genes, specifically inuA and cscA, along with their homologs found in Bifidobacterium adolescentis and B. longum strains available in the NCBI database. Based on the consensus regions identified from these alignments, primer sets were designed to selectively amplify GH32 gene fragments specific to B. adolescentis and B. longum (Figures S1 and S2).
Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed to determine the copy numbers of GH32 genes specific to B. longum and B. adolescentis, along with the total bacterial 16S rRNA genes. Amplification was carried out using a QuantStudio 3 system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with the PowerTrack SYBR Green Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
The qPCR reactions comprised an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min and a final extension at 72 °C for 1 min. Each assay consisted of 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, annealing for 15 s, and 72 °C for 15 s. The annealing temperature was set at 65 °C for inuA and at 60 °C for both cscA and 16S rRNA. Primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table S1 [34].
Absolute quantification was achieved using PCR amplicons derived from fecal DNA samples as external standards. The inuA and cscA levels were defined as the copy number of each gene divided by that of the 16S rRNA gene and multiplied by 103. The change in inuA and cscA levels was calculated as the difference between post-intervention and baseline values (i.e., post-intervention level–baseline level).

2.8. Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions

The type strains B. longum subsp. longum JCM 1217 and B. adolescentis JCM 1275 were obtained from the Japan Collection of Microorganisms (JCM). All strains were cultivated using reinforced flora (RF) medium—a modified brain heart infusion (BHI) broth based on a previously described formulation [35]. The RF medium consisted of BHI broth (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 5 g/L yeast extract (Becton Dickinson, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), 5 g/L K2HPO4 (Fujifilm-Wako, Osaka, Japan), 8 g/L glucose (Fujifilm-Wako), 0.5 g/L L-cysteine hydrochloride (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 1 g/L Tween 80 (Tokyo Kasei Chemical Co., Tokyo, Japan), 0.005 g/L hemin (Fujifilm-Wako), 0.002 g/L vitamin K1 (Fujifilm-Wako), 0.001 g/L resazurin sodium salt (Tokyo Kasei Chemical Co.), 0.025 g/L sodium acetate (Fujifilm-Wako), and 0.01 g/L MgSO4·7H2O (Fujifilm-Wako), with the pH adjusted to 6.8. As required, 0.25% (w/v) Kes (<98% purity; Itochu Sugar Co., Ltd., Hekinan, Japan) and 0.25% (w/v) Inu from chicory (Sigma-Aldrich) solutions, sterilized using a 0.2-µm cellulose acetate filter (DISMIC-25CS, Advantec, Tokyo, Japan), were added to the RF medium before incubation.
For growth assays, each strain was first precultured in RF medium containing 0.25% (w/w) Kes and 0.25% (w/w) Inu at 37 °C for 20 h under anaerobic conditions using the AnaeroPack system (Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Tokyo, Japan). The resulting cultures were diluted 10-fold with sterile water (180 µL water + 20 µL culture), and the OD660 was measured. Each bacterial suspension was then further diluted in RF medium to achieve a starting OD660 of 0.1.
First, 300 µL of RF medium and 80 µL of either 2.5% (w/w) fructan or 2.5% (w/w) sucrose was dispensed into each well of a 96-deep well plate (AxyGen Scientific, Union City, CA, USA). Wells were inoculated with 20 µL of the adjusted bacterial suspension (final substrate concentration: 0.5%) and incubated at 37 °C under anaerobic conditions (n = 6). At 27 h post-inoculation, 20 µL of each culture was transferred to 180 µL of sterile water in 96-well flat-bottomed plates (4845-96F; Watson Bio Lab, San Diego, CA, USA), and turbidity was assessed by measuring OD660 using a microplate reader (SpectraMax M2; Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA). Growth levels were corrected for non-substrate background by subtracting the OD660 values of the no-carbon control (only RF medium). Relative growth was then calculated by normalizing the background-corrected growth in each substrate to that obtained with sucrose, which was set to 100% within the same experiment.

2.9. Determination of Short-Chain Fatty Acid (SCFA) and Lactate Concentrations in Fecal Samples

SCFAs (acetate, propionate, and butyrate) and lactate concentrations in fecal samples were determined in accordance with previously established methods [23]. The carboxyl group of SCFAs and lactate in each fecal sample was labeled with 2-nitrophenyl hydrazide using a Short- and Long-Chain Fatty Acid Analysis Kit (YMC, Kyoto, Japan) following the improved kit protocol. Briefly, a 20–50 mg fecal sample was weighed into a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). Thereafter, 1 mL of PBS was added to the tube on ice, and the tube was vortexed for 30 s. The tube was centrifuged at 15,000 rpm at 4 °C for 2 min. The supernatant was used for the labeling reaction. Here, 50 µL of the supernatant was mixed with 50 µL of PBS, 200 µL of 2 mM caproic acid (Fujifilm-Wako) as an internal standard, 200 µL of 20 mM 2-nitrophenylhydrazin (in water), and 200 µL of 0.25 M N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride HCl [in ethanol, with an equal volume of 3% pyridine in ethanol (v:v)]. The mixture was heated at 60 °C for 20 min. Thereafter, 200 µL of 15% (w/v) potassium hydroxide was added, and the mixture was incubated at 60 °C for 15 min. The reaction mixture was added to 4 mL of a 3.8:0.4 (v:v) mixture of 0.03 M PBS (pH 6.4):0.5 M hydrochloric acid and then filtered through a 0.45-µm filter (PTFE, Puradisc™ 13 mm Syringe Filters, Whatman, Maidstone, Kent, UK). Subsequently, SCFAs derivatives were extracted using 5 mL of diethyl ether. The diethyl ether layer was evaporated to dryness under a nitrogen stream at room temperature. The residue was dissolved in 200 µL of methanol, and 10 µL of each sample was analyzed using HPLC to quantify the major SCFAs. Chromatographic separations were performed using an HPLC Nexera XL series HPLC Instrument (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) and a YMC-Pack FA HPLC column (6.0 mm I.D. × 250 mm; YMC). The solvent system for elution consisted of 30:16:54 (v:v:v) acetonitrile (Fujifilm-Wako)–methyl alcohol (Fujifilm-Wako)–ultrapure water. The duration of the elution program was 20 min at a flow rate of 1.2 mL/min, and the column temperature was maintained at 50 °C. The eluents were monitored at 400 nm to detect derivatized 2-nitrophenylhydrazine.

2.10. Dietary Assessment

Dietary intake data were collected at baseline using the BDHQ, a validated tool designed to estimate habitual food and nutrient intake among Japanese adults over the preceding month. The BDHQ comprises 80 items and enables estimation of intake for 58 food groups and more than 100 nutrients. Standard portion sizes were based on typical Japanese recipes. Intake of dietary supplements was not included in the analysis.
Both nutrient and food group intakes were energy-adjusted to grams per 1000 kcal using the density method [36] prior to statistical analysis.

2.11. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 10.0.6 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). For in vitro growth assays of Bifidobacterium strains, data were analyzed using a parametric unpaired t-test. All other data were analyzed using non-parametric methods: between-group comparisons were performed using the Mann–Whitney U test, whereas within-group comparisons before and after the intervention were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients were used to evaluate associations between dietary factors and microbiota indices. A p of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and a p of < 0.1 was interpreted as indicating a trend.

3. Results

3.1. Participant Details and Baseline Characteristics

Figure 1 shows the flow chart of the study. During the study, 2 participants in the Prebio group and 1 in the Placebo group were withdrawn owing to antibiotic use, resulting in 37 participants (18 Prebio, 19 Placebo) included in the final analysis. No participants discontinued the study owing to adverse events such as abdominal pain. All withdrawals were attributed to the use of antibiotics for acute gastrointestinal infections (e.g., viral gastroenteritis), in accordance with the predefined exclusion criteria. Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. All participants were healthy adults, except for one in each group with seasonal allergic rhinitis. There were no significant differences in sex, age, body weight, or BMI between groups. Height was higher in the Prebio group than in the Placebo group, and the total number of supplement intake days was significantly higher in the Placebo group than in the Prebio group.

3.2. Baseline and Post-Intervention Fecal Microbiome Diversity and Composition

To evaluate the effects of Kes and Inu supplementation on gut microbiota composition, 16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed on fecal samples collected at baseline and after the 4-week intervention (Post). Changes in both microbial diversity and taxonomic composition were analyzed to determine microbiota responses to prebiotic intake.
Alpha diversity, measured using the Shannon index, showed a significant decrease post intervention compared with that at baseline only in the Prebio group, whereas no notable change was observed in the Placebo group (Figure 2a). Beta diversity, assessed using PCoA based on weighted UniFrac distances, showed no significant differences between baseline and post-intervention in either group (Figure 2b), suggesting that overall microbiota structure remained relatively stable during the intervention.
Given that fructans such as Kes and Inu selectively promote the growth of certain beneficial bacteria, taxa that increased in response to supplementation were examined. At the phylum level, only Actinobacteria showed a significant increase in the Prebio group post-intervention (Figure 2c). Within Actinobacteria, only the genus Bifidobacterium_388775 showed a significant post-intervention increase in the Prebio group (Figure 2d). Furthermore, at the species level, only B. adolescentis and B. longum showed significant increases in relative abundance post-intervention compared with baseline in the Prebio group (Figure 2e,f).
These findings indicate that the observed increases in Bifidobacterium taxa were a specific response to prebiotic supplementation, as no such changes were observed in the Placebo group. Despite these taxonomic shifts, fecal SCFAs concentrations at baseline and post-intervention were not significantly different in either group (Supplementary Table S2).

3.3. Subgroup Analysis Based on Microbial Response

To explore inter-individual variation in microbial response to prebiotic supplementation, participants in the Prebio group were stratified into two subgroups: responders—defined as individuals who showed increases in both B. adolescentis and B. longum between baseline and post-intervention—and non-responders—who did not meet this criterion. No significant differences were noted in baseline characteristics—including sex, age, height, body weight, BMI, and the number of supplement intake days—between responders and non-responders (Supplementary Table S3).
Although alpha diversity did not differ between the two subgroups, the beta diversity in post-intervention samples from responders was significantly different from both baseline and post-intervention samples of non-responders (Figure 3a,b), suggesting a distinct compositional shift in the gut microbiota among responders following supplementation.
Next, we examined taxonomic changes in bacterial groups previously identified at the group level. In the responder subgroup, the relative abundance of both B. adolescentis and B. longum was significantly higher in post-intervention samples than in baseline samples. In the non-responder subgroup, only B. longum showed a significant increase post-intervention compared with that at baseline. Moreover, the relative abundance of B. adolescentis was significantly higher in responders than in non-responders both at baseline and post-intervention (Figure 3c,d). At baseline, no notable differences were observed between responders and non-responders at the phylum or genus levels, and apart from B. adolescentis, only Blautia_A_141781 unclassified and Bacteroides_H ovatus showed significant differences, both of which were more abundant in the non-responder subgroup (Supplementary Figure S3). Thus, only minor compositional differences were observed between the two subgroups.
Despite these responder-specific increases in Bifidobacterium, fecal SCFAs concentrations at baseline and post-intervention were not significant in either subgroup (Supplementary Table S4).

3.4. GH32 Gene Abundance in Responders and Non-Responders and Fructan Utilization by B. adolescentis and B. longum

To test the hypothesis that the increased abundance of B. adolescentis and B. longum in responders was associated with the functional capacity of these species to degrade fructans, we examined the abundance of GH32 family genes specific to each taxon.
The abundance of inuA homologs closely mirrored the relative abundance of B. adolescentis. It showed a significant increase only in responders and was higher in responders than in non-responders both at baseline and post-intervention (Figure 4a). Moreover, the change in abundance (ΔinuA) was significantly greater in responders (Figure 4b). Further, cscA homologs also showed a significant increase exclusively in responders, with no significant changes in non-responders (Figure 4c), and the change in abundance (ΔcscA) showed a trend toward being greater in responders (Figure 4d).
Following qPCR analysis of inuA and cscA, we cultured B. adolescentis and B. longum in media supplemented with Kes or Inu. In Kes-supplemented media, both species exhibited significant growth, although B. adolescentis exhibited weaker growth than B. longum (Figure 5a). In contrast, in Inu-supplemented media, only B. adolescentis showed measurable growth, whereas B. longum did not grow (Figure 5b).

3.5. Associations Between Nutrient Intake and GH32 Gene Response

Given that responders exhibited distinct changes in GH32 gene abundance, characterized by higher baseline levels of inuA and greater values of ΔinuA and ΔcscA, we next examined whether these gene markers were associated with baseline nutrient intake assessed using the BDHQ. Spearman’s rank correlation analysis revealed trend-level associations between dietary zinc intake and baseline inuA abundance, as well as between retinol and C16:3 ( n-6)) intake and ΔinuA levels (Figure 6a). In addition, a negative correlation trend was observed between C18:3 (n-3) intake and ΔcscA levels (p < 0.1 for all).
To further assess whether these nutrients were linked to microbial responder status, we compared their intake levels between responders and non-responders. Among the candidate nutrients, retinol and C16:3 (n-6) intake were significantly higher in responders than in non-responders (p < 0.05), whereas no significant differences were observed for zinc or C18:3 intake (n-3) (Figure 6b,c).

3.6. Dietary Food Intake Associated with GH32-Related Microbial Responses

To further characterize dietary factors associated with microbial gene responses, we investigated correlations between the intake of selected food items and three GH32-related markers: ΔinuA, retinol, and C16:3 (n-6).
Spearman’s rank correlation analysis revealed trend-level or stronger associations (p < 0.1) between these markers and several food items (Figure 7a). Notably, intake of green leafy vegetables was strongly correlated with C16:3 (n-6) and showed a trend-level positive association with ΔinuA.
Additional foods showing positive associations with at least one of the three markers included liver, canned tuna, lean fish, eggs, tofu and deep-fried tofu, carrots and pumpkin, daikon radish and turnip, other root vegetables, and seaweed.
In contrast, intake of fatty fish, mushrooms, cooking salt, and cooking sugar was negatively associated with one or more of these GH32-related markers.
Subsequent group comparisons revealed that responders consumed significantly more green leafy vegetables and canned tuna than non-responders (Figure 7b,c), whereas no significant differences were observed for the other food items.

4. Discussion

In this randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we evaluated the effects of combined short-chain (Kes) and long-chain (Inu) fructan supplementation on the human gut microbiota. Fructans are generally hydrolyzed by enzymes of the GH32 family, producing fructose monomers that are further metabolized through species-specific pathways. B. adolescentis and B. longum are known to harbor GH32 genes inuA and cscA, respectively, which enable them to utilize Inu and Kes, respectively, as carbon sources [37,38]. The intervention selectively promoted the growth of B. adolescentis and B. longum, along with increases in corresponding GH32 enzymes. These findings suggest that microbial responsiveness to dietary fructans may involve multiple factors, including the presence of relevant catabolic enzymes such as GH32 family fructanases and host dietary patterns.
Both species, which were found to increase in the present study, have been reported to possess immunomodulatory and gut barrier–supporting properties. B. adolescentis has been shown to ameliorate dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis by maintaining tight junction integrity and modulating pro-inflammatory cytokines [39] and may also contribute to antiviral defense against coxsackievirus B3 [40]. B. longum, on the contrary, has demonstrated anti-inflammatory effects in IBD models, including the induction of Treg cells and the maintenance of tight junction [41]. Moreover, co-administration of B. adolescentis and B. longum has been shown to activate a broad range of immune functions, including T-cell responses, NK cell activity, macrophage phagocytosis, and antibody production [42]. These observations suggest that increased levels of these Bifidobacterium species may contribute to the maintenance of immune homeostasis and enhancement of host defense mechanisms via the gut microbiota.
Among the metabolites produced by the gut microbiota are SCFAs, including acetate, propionate, and butyrate. These SCFAs act on host immune-related cells—such as dendritic cells, T cells, and macrophages—via G protein–coupled receptors, thereby contributing to immune homeostasis and the regulation of inflammation [43]. B. adolescentis and B. longum have been reported to produce acetate [44], and their increased abundance is generally considered indicative of enhanced SCFA production in the gut.
In this study, we measured fecal SCFAs concentrations as a non-invasive indicator of the gut environment. However, no significant changes in fecal SCFAs concentrations were observed after the intervention. Although this approach is widely used, the majority of SCFAs produced are absorbed by the intestinal epithelium and distributed systemically [45]. Therefore, fecal concentrations may only partially reflect their actual production. Consequently, potential changes in SCFAs production in this trial might not have been fully captured in fecal measurements. A similar observation was reported in a previous study involving Kes supplementation in children with cow’s milk allergy, where an increase in acetate-producing bacteria did not correspond to changes in fecal SCFAs levels [13]. In addition, as fecal samples were self-collected by participants, minor differences in handling time or storage could also have introduced variability. Future studies incorporating plasma SCFA analysis or standardized collection procedures may provide a more accurate assessment of total SCFA production.
To investigate fructan responsiveness patterns, participants who exhibited increases in both B. adolescentis and B. longum following the intervention were defined as responders and all others were classified as non-responders. In responders, the abundance of both species, as well as that of their corresponding GH32 genes (inuA and cscA), showed a consistent increase. Furthermore, cultivation experiments showed that B. adolescentis was able to grow on Inu as well as on Kes, although its growth on Kes was lower than that of B. longum. In contrast, B. longum showed growth only on Kes. These growth patterns are in line with the observation from previous studies reporting that inulinase of B. adolescentis can act on both FOS and Inu, whereas the CscA of B. longum exhibits substrate specificity restricted to short-chain fructans [37,38,46]. Collectively, these findings suggest that combined intake of Kes and Inu selectively promotes the growth of Bifidobacterium species harboring GH32 enzymes with distinct substrate specificities.
The gut microbiota is strongly influenced by host diet. Therefore, in this study, we investigated nutrients associated with the microbial changes we observed. Responders were characterized by higher baseline levels of inuA, together with greater increases in inuA and cscA during the intervention. Among these features, in particular, we noted associations of retinoic acid (RA) and C16:3 n-6 intake with ΔinuA. Among them, retinol is known to regulate T-cell differentiation and antimicrobial peptide expression via its metabolite, RA. Vitamin A deficiency (VAD) is known to severely impair host defense by altering T-cell profiles [47] and reducing the production of antimicrobial peptides [48]. This immunosuppression increases susceptibility to pathogenic infections. In fact, animal models of VAD, including livestock and poultry, have demonstrated reduced resistance to Escherichia coli infection [49,50]. Moreover, epidemiological studies in Mexican children have shown that VAD enhances pro-inflammatory cytokine responses during norovirus infection [51]. VAD has also been shown to affect gut microbiota composition. Specifically, VAD models exhibit a decrease in commensal Bifidobacterium species and an increase in pathogenic bacteria, such as Staphylococcus spp. [52]. These findings suggest that retinoic acid, the bioactive metabolite of retinol, plays a critical role not only in immune regulation but also in maintaining gut microbial homeostasis. Although these observations are based on VAD conditions, they raise the possibility that retinol intake may influence microbial fructan responsiveness through immune and epithelial mechanisms even in healthy individuals.
In contrast to those involving retinol, direct studies on C16:3 n-6 remain limited. However, other n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-6 PUFAs) are known precursors of pro-inflammatory eicosanoids and have been implicated as risk factors for chronic inflammation when consumed in excess [53]. Nevertheless, appropriate intake of n-6 PUFAs is essential for maintaining immune homeostasis, and their quantitative balance appears to be critical [54]. For instance, n-6 PUFAs have been shown to suppress IL-4-induced increases in intestinal permeability [55] and to protect against the onset of type 1 diabetes in antibiotic-treated mouse models [56]. These findings suggest that retinol and C16:3 n-6 intake may influence gut microbiota composition by modulating host immune and epithelial environments, thereby contributing to inter-individual differences in responsiveness to fructan supplementation.
The food group analysis in this study revealed that the intake of green leafy vegetables and canned tuna was significantly higher among responders. Leafy greens, especially spinach, are rich in C16:3, as reported in the Human Metabolome Database (https://www.hmdb.ca/ accessed on 13 July 2025), and contain other functional components such as β-carotene (a retinol precursor), dietary fiber, and polyphenols. Canned tuna is a good source of n-3 PUFAs (DHA and EPA), vitamin D, and zinc, all of which are known to influence both host physiology and gut microbiota composition [57,58]. In the present study, intake of leafy vegetables was positively correlated with both C16:3 n-6 and ΔinuA, suggesting that moderate consumption of leafy greens may enhance fructan metabolism via GH32 enzyme induction.
Although no direct association was observed between canned tuna intake and ΔinuA, we cannot exclude the possibility that co-consumed foods or other nutrients present in tuna may contribute to microbial fructan responsiveness. Further investigation is warranted.
This study has several limitations.
First, the observed associations between specific nutrients (e.g., retinol and C16:3 n-6) and microbiome responses are correlational rather than causal. We did not conduct a diet-controlled intervention targeting these nutrients or foods (e.g., green leafy vegetables or canned tuna). Therefore, future studies under strict dietary control, including protocols that vary co-intake of fructans with canned tuna or other nutrient sources, are needed to clarify whether GH32 (inuA/cscA) responses are differentially modulated. In addition, dietary intake was assessed only at baseline and not after 4 weeks; although most participants reported no major dietary changes during the short intervention, the lack of post-intervention data may have limited the evaluation of diet-related effects. Furthermore, as the dietary assessment was based on self-reported recall and the study did not control for diet, future studies with stricter dietary control are warranted.
Second, this study primarily aimed to investigate the relationship between fructan supplementation, gut microbiota composition, and dietary factors. Accordingly, host physiological parameters were not assessed, and potential links between microbial changes and systemic health outcomes could not be determined. Future studies should therefore include relevant host biomarkers to clarify the physiological significance of microbiome alterations.
Third, because Kes and Inu were administered in combination, it was not possible to determine the specific contribution of each fructan to the observed microbial responses in the human trial. Although the distinct substrate preferences and GH32 enzyme specificities of B. adolescentis and B. longum were demonstrated in vitro in the present study, their specific roles in humans remain unclear in this study. Therefore, future studies using single-fructan interventions will be necessary to clarify their individual roles in modulating gut microbial dynamics.
Fourth, the intervention lasted only 4 weeks, so the durability of the observed microbial changes remains unknown; longer follow-up is warranted.
Finally, as this was a relatively small-scale trial with a total of 40 participants, the responder and non-responder subgroups were also small (n = 8 and n = 10, respectively), which may limit statistical power and reproducibility. Moreover, the cohort consisted predominantly of young Japanese women (mean age averages, 20 years; women, 94.59%), restricting generalizability across sex, age, and ethnic backgrounds. While BMI was comparable between groups, baseline height differed; although the likelihood of an impact on the outcomes is considered low, a potential influence cannot be ruled out. Consequently, large scale, multicenter studies that include participants with diverse ages, sexes, and health conditions are warranted to validate and extend these findings.

5. Conclusions

This randomized, double-blind, controlled trial is the first to examine the effects of combined Kes and Inu supplementation on the human gut microbiota. The results revealed distinct responder and non-responder profiles, with differential expression of GH32 genes—inuA and cscA—linked to microbial fructan utilization. These enzyme responses were associated with habitual intake of specific nutrients, particularly retinol and C16:3 n-6 fatty acid, and higher consumption of green leafy vegetables and canned tuna. Our findings suggest that both bacterial enzymatic traits and host dietary patterns influence individual responsiveness to prebiotic intake. This study provides foundational evidence for designing personalized dietary strategies to modulate fructan-responsive gut microbes based on microbial function and diet.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods14234090/s1, Supplementary Figure S1: Nucleotide sequence alignment of the GH32 gene (inuA) from Bifidobacterium adolescentis and related species. Supplementary Figure S2: Nucleotide sequence alignment of the GH32 gene (cscA) from Bifidobacterium longum and related species. Supplementary Figure S3: Baseline gut microbiota in responder and non-responder subgroups. Supplementary Table S1: PCR primers used in the present study. Supplementary Table S2: Fecal short-chain fatty acid concentrations at baseline and post-intervention in both groups. Supplementary Table S3: Baseline characteristics of the subgroups. Supplementary Table S4: Fecal short-chain fatty acid concentrations at baseline and post-intervention in subgroups.

Author Contributions

H.T.: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation. Visualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing. T.F.: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Validation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing. C.Y.: Investigation, Writing—review and editing. N.K.: Conceptualization, Writing—review and editing. K.K.: Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing—review and editing. K.F. (Kohei Funasaka): Conceptualization, Writing—review and editing. E.O.: Conceptualization, Writing—review and editing. Y.H.: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing—review and editing. T.T.: Conceptualization, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Writing—review and editing. K.F. (Kotoyo Fujiki): Conceptualization, Data curation, Supervision, Investigation, Writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI under Grant Number JP24K14784 and by the Anzu no Mori Foundation 2024 Research Grant (https://anzunomori.org/subsidy/ (accessed on 2 October 2025)).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nagoya University of Arts and Sciences (approval number: 772). The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Biological Research Involving Human Subjects in Japan. The protocol was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) (registration number: jRCT1041240180), approved date: 26 July 2024.

Informed Consent Statement

All participants provided written informed consent after receiving a full explanation of the study objectives and procedures, and their personal information was anonymized to ensure confidentiality.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article and Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author. The 16S rRNA gene NGS datasets were deposited in The NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) (accession number: PRJNA1301572 (approved on 6 August 2025)).

Acknowledgments

We thank M. Shimazaki and S. Umezaki for technical assistance with DNA extraction and determination of SCFAs. We thank a professional English editing service for assistance with language editing and preparation of the graphical abstract.

Conflicts of Interest

Hideaki Takahashi, Tadashi Fujii, Yoshiki Hirooka, and Takumi Tochio were employed by the BIOSIS Lab. Co., Ltd., a venture company; however, their contributions to this study were made solely in their individual capacities as researchers and co-authors. Nobuhiro Kondo is affiliated with WELLNEO SUGAR Co., Ltd. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
BDHQBrief Self-administered Diet History Questionnaire
BHI Brain heart infusion
DP Degree of polymerization
FOS Fructo-oligosaccharides 
GH32glycoside hydrolase family 32
IBDInflammatory bowel disease
InuInulin
JCMJapan Collection of Microorganisms
jRCTJapan Registry of Clinical Trials
Kes1-Kestose
n-6 PUFAsn-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids
PCoAPrincipal coordinate analysis 
qPCRQuantitative PCR
RARetinoic acid
RCTRandomized controlled trial
RFReinforced flora
SCFAsShort-chain fatty acids 
SRASequence Read Archive
VADVitamin A deficiency

References

  1. DeGruttola, A.K.; Low, D.; Mizoguchi, A.; Mizoguchi, E. Current understanding of dysbiosis in disease in human and animal models. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2016, 22, 1137–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hou, K.; Wu, Z.-X.; Chen, X.-Y.; Wang, J.-Q.; Zhang, D.; Xiao, C.; Zhu, D.; Koya, J.B.; Wei, L.; Li, J.; et al. Microbiota in health and diseases. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022, 7, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pascal, M.; Perez-Gordo, M.; Caballero, T.; Escribese, M.M.; Lopez Longo, M.N.; Luengo, O.; Manso, L.; Matheu, V.; Seoane, E.; Zamorano, M.; et al. Microbiome and allergic diseases. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gibson, G.R.; Hutkins, R.; Sanders, M.E.; Prescott, S.L.; Reimer, R.A.; Salminen, S.J.; Scott, K.; Stanton, C.; Swanson, K.S.; Cani, P.D.; et al. Expert consensus document: The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of prebiotics. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 14, 491–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Slavin, J.J. Fiber and prebiotics: Mechanisms and health benefits. Nutrients 2013, 5, 1417–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Astó, E.; Méndez, I.; Rodríguez-Prado, M.; Cuñé, J.; Espadaler, J.; Farran-Codina, A. Effect of the degree of polymerization of fructans on ex vivo fermented human gut microbiome. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Scott, K.P.; Martin, J.C.; Duncan, S.H.; Flint, H.J. Prebiotic stimulation of human colonic butyrate-producing bacteria and bifidobacteria, in vitro. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2014, 87, 30–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sannohe, Y.; Fukasawa, T.; Koga, J.; Kubota, H.; Kanegae, M. Comparison of the growth of bifidobacteria in two culture media containing either 1-kestose (GF2) or nystose (GF3). Biosci. Microflora 2008, 27, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Suzuki, N.; Aiba, Y.; Takeda, H.; Fukumori, Y.; Koga, Y. Superiority of 1-kestose, the smallest fructo-oligosaccharide, to a synthetic mixture of fructo-oligosaccharides in the selective stimulating activity on bifidobacteria. Biosci. Microflora 2006, 25, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Watanabe, A.; Tochio, T.; Kadota, Y.; Takahashi, M.; Kitaura, Y.; Ishikawa, H.; Yasutake, T.; Nakano, M.; Shinohara, H.; Kudo, T.; et al. Supplementation of 1-kestose modulates the gut microbiota composition to ameliorate glucose metabolism in obesity-prone hosts. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Watanabe, A.; Kadota, Y.; Kamio, R.; Tochio, T.; Endo, A.; Shimomura, Y.; Kitaura, Y. 1-Kestose supplementation mitigates the progressive deterioration of glucose metabolism in type 2 diabetes OLETF rats. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 15674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kim, J.-H.; Baek, J.; Sa, S.; Park, J.; Kih, M.; Kim, W. Kestose-enriched fructo-oligosaccharide alleviates atopic dermatitis by modulating the gut microbiome and immune response. J. Funct. Foods 2021, 85, 104650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shibata, R.; Koga, Y.; Takahashi, M.; Murakami, Y.; Tochio, T.; Kadota, Y. In children with cow’s milk allergy, 1-kestose affects the gut microbiota and reaction threshold. Pediatr. Res. 2023, 94, 1067–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ikegami, S.; Nakamura, M.; Honda, T.; Yamamura, T.; Maeda, K.; Sawada, T.; Ishikawa, E.; Yamamoto, K.; Furune, S.; Ishikawa, T.; et al. Efficacy of 1-kestose supplementation in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2023, 57, 1249–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tominaga, K.; Tsuchiya, A.; Nakano, O.; Kuroki, Y.; Oka, K.; Minemura, A.; Matsumoto, A.; Takahashi, M.; Kadota, Y.; Tochio, T.; et al. Increase in muscle mass associated with the prebiotic effects of 1-kestose in super-elderly patients with sarcopenia. Biosci. Microbiota Food Health 2021, 40, 150–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nakaoka, K.; Ohno, E.; Kuramitsu, K.; Kuzuya, T.; Funasaka, K.; Tochio, T.; Fujii, T.; Takahashi, H.; Kondo, N.; Miyahara, R.; et al. Efficacy of 1-kestose supplementation in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A randomized controlled pilot study. Nutrients 2024, 16, 2889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alonso-Allende, J.; Milagro, F.I.; Aranaz, P. Health effects and mechanisms of inulin action in human metabolism. Nutrients 2024, 16, 2935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Balcázar-Muñoz, B.R.; Martínez-Abundis, E.; González-Ortiz, M. Effect of oral inulin administration on lipid profile and insulin sensitivity in subjects with obesity and dyslipidemia. Rev. Med. Chile 2003, 131, 597–604. [Google Scholar]
  19. Barbero-Becerra, V.; Juárez-Hernández, E.; Chávez-Tapia, N.C.; Uribe, M. Inulin as a clinical therapeutic intervention in metabolic associated fatty liver disease. Food Rev. Int. 2022, 38 (Suppl. S1), 336–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ranawana, V. Inulin: A review of its functional properties in relation to calcium absorption in humans. J. Food Agric. 2010, 1, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tanno, H.; Fujii, T.; Hirano, K.; Maeno, S.; Tonozuka, T.; Sakamoto, M.; Ohkuma, M.; Tochio, T.; Endo, A. Characterization of fructooligosaccharide metabolism and fructooligosaccharide-degrading enzymes in human commensal butyrate producers. Gut Microbes 2021, 13, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Takahashi, H.; Fujii, T.; Yamada, C.; Fujiki, K.; Kondo, N.; Kuramitsu, K.; Funasaka, K.; Ohno, E.; Hirooka, Y.; Tochio, T. Synergistic effects of short- and long-chain fructans: A novel strategy for mitigating ovalbumin allergy via microbiome-driven acetate production. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 2025, 71, 238–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Takahashi, H.; Fujii, T.; Yamakawa, S.; Yamada, C.; Fujiki, K.; Kondo, N.; Funasaka, K.; Hirooka, Y.; Tochio, T. Combined oral intake of short and long fructans alters the gut microbiota in food allergy model mice and contributes to food allergy prevention. BMC Microbiol. 2023, 23, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Abrams, S.A.; Griffin, I.J.; Hawthorne, K.M.; Liang, L.; Gunn, S.K.; Darlington, G.; Ellis, K.J. A combination of prebiotic short- and long-chain inulin-type fructans enhances calcium absorption and bone mineralization in young adolescents. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2005, 82, 471–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Moles, L.; Otaegui, D. The impact of diet on microbiota evolution and human health. Is diet an adequate tool for microbiota modulation? Nutrients 2020, 12, 1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Oe, M.; Sasaki, S.; Shimura, T.; Takaki, Y.; Sanada, H. Effects of multilayer silicone foam dressings for the prevention of pressure ulcers in high-risk patients: A randomized clinical trial. Adv. Wound Care 2020, 9, 649–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kobayashi, S.; Murakami, K.; Sasaki, S.; Okubo, H.; Hirota, N.; Notsu, A.; Fukui, M.; Date, C. Comparison of relative validity of food group intakes estimated by comprehensive and brief-type self-administered diet history questionnaires against 16 d dietary records in Japanese adults. Public Health Nutr. 2011, 14, 1200–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kobayashi, S.; Honda, S.; Murakami, K.; Sasaki, S.; Okubo, H.; Hirota, N.; Notsu, A.; Fukui, M.; Date, C. Both comprehensive and brief self-administered diet history questionnaires satisfactorily rank nutrient intakes in Japanese adults. J. Epidemiol. 2012, 22, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Takahashi, S.; Tomita, J.; Nishioka, K.; Hisada, T.; Nishijima, M. Development of a prokaryotic universal primer for simultaneous analysis of bacteria and archaea using next-generation sequencing. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e105592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bolyen, E.; Rideout, J.R.; Dillon, M.R.; Bokulich, N.A.; Abnet, C.C.; Al-Ghalith, G.A.; Alexander, H.; Alm, E.J.; Arumugam, M.; Asnicar, F.; et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Callahan, B.J.; McMurdie, P.J.; Rosen, M.J.; Han, A.W.; Johnson, A.J.A.; Holmes, S.P. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 581–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bokulich, N.A.; Kaehler, B.D.; Rideout, J.R.; Dillon, M.; Bolyen, E.; Knight, R.; Huttley, G.A.; Gregory Caporaso, J. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome 2018, 6, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. McDonald, D.; Jiang, Y.; Balaban, M.; Cantrell, K.; Zhu, Q.; Gonzalez, A.; Morton, J.T.; Nicolaou, G.; Parks, D.H.; Karst, S.M.; et al. Greengenes2 unifies microbial data in a single reference tree. Nat. Biotechnol. 2024, 42, 715–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Furet, J.-P.; Firmesse, O.; Gourmelon, M.; Bridonneau, C.; Tap, J.; Mondot, S.; Doré, J.; Corthier, G. Comparative assessment of human and farm animal faecal microbiota using real-time quantitative PCR. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2009, 68, 351–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Le Blay, G.; Lacroix, C.; Zihler, A.; Fliss, I. In vitro inhibition activity of nisin A, nisin Z, pediocin PA-1 and antibiotics against common intestinal bacteria. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 252–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Murakami, K.; Sasaki, S.; Uenishi, K.; Japan Dietetic Students’ Study for Nutrition and Biomarkers Group. The degree of misreporting of the energy-adjusted intake of protein, potassium, and sodium does not differ among under-, acceptable, and over-reporters of energy intake. Nutr. Res. 2012, 32, 741–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Duranti, S.; Milani, C.; Lugli, G.A.; Mancabelli, L.; Turroni, F.; Ferrario, C.; Mangifesta, M.; Viappiani, A.; Sánchez, B.; Margolles, A.; et al. Evaluation of genetic diversity among strains of the human gut commensal Bifidobacterium adolescentis. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Tanno, H.; Fujii, T.; Ose, R.; Hirano, K.; Tochio, T.; Endo, A. Characterization of fructooligosaccharide-degrading enzymes in human commensal Bifidobacterium longum and Anaerostipes caccae. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019, 518, 294–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, B.; Wang, H.; Wang, M.; Liang, H.; Hu, T.; Yang, J.; Li, S.; You, X.; Xia, B.; Yuan, Y.; et al. Genome analysis of Bifidobacterium adolescentis and investigation of its effects on inflammation and intestinal barrier function. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1496280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kim, M.J.; Lee, D.K.; Park, J.E.; Park, I.H.; Seo, J.G.; Ha, N.J. Antiviral activity of Bifidobacterium adolescentis SPM1605 against coxsackievirus B3. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2014, 28, 681–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yao, S.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, W.; Liu, X. Bifidobacterium longum: Protection against inflammatory bowel disease. J. Immunol. Res. 2021, 2021, 8030297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Yang, H.-Y.; Liu, S.-L.; Ibrahim, S.A.; Zhao, L.; Jiang, J.-L.; Sun, W.-F.; Ren, F.-Z. Oral administration of live Bifidobacterium substrains isolated from healthy centenarians enhanced immune function in BALB/c mice. Nutr. Res. 2009, 29, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Parada Venegas, D.; De la Fuente, M.K.; Landskron, G.; González, M.J.; Quera, R.; Dijkstra, G.; Harmsen, H.J.M.; Faber, K.N.; Hermoso, M.A. Short chain fatty acids (SCFAs)-mediated gut epithelial and immune regulation and its relevance for inflammatory bowel diseases. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Marx, S.P.; Winkler, S.; Hartmeier, W. Metabolization of beta-(2,6)-linked fructose-oligosaccharides by different bifidobacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2000, 182, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  45. Boets, E.; Deroover, L.; Houben, E.; Vermeulen, K.; Gomand, S.V.; Delcour, J.A.; Verbeke, K. Quantification of in vivo colonic short-chain fatty acid production from inulin. Nutrients 2015, 7, 8916–8929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rivière, A.; Selak, M.; Geirnaert, A.; Van den Abbeele, P.; De Vuyst, L. Complementary mechanisms for degradation of inulin-type fructans and arabinoxylan oligosaccharides among bifidobacterial strains suggest bacterial cooperation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e02893-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hurwitz, J.; Surman, S.; Jones, B.; Sealy, R.; Woodland, D.; Rudraraju, R. Vitamin A deficiency alters antibody forming cell and CD8+ T cell responses following intranasal vaccination with a respiratory virus vaccine (105.9). J. Immunol. 2012, 188, 105.9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Filipe Rosa, L.; Petersen, P.P.; Görtz, L.F.; Stolzer, I.; Kaden-Volynets, V.; Günther, C.; Bischoff, S.C. Vitamin A- and D-deficient diets disrupt intestinal antimicrobial peptide defense involving Wnt and STAT5 signaling pathways in mice. Nutrients 2023, 15, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Friedman, A.; Meidovsky, A.; Leitner, G.; Sklan, D. Decreased resistance and immune response to Escherichia coli infection in chicks with low or high intakes of vitamin A. J. Nutr. 1991, 121, 395–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. He, X.; Li, Y.; Li, M.; Jia, G.; Dong, H.; Zhang, Y.; He, C.; Wang, C.; Deng, L.; Yang, Y. Hypovitaminosis A coupled to secondary bacterial infection in beef cattle. BMC Vet. Res. 2012, 8, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Long, K.Z.; Garcia, C.; Ko, G.; Santos, J.I.; Al Mamun, A.; Rosado, J.L.; DuPont, H.L.; Nathakumar, N. Vitamin A modifies the intestinal chemokine and cytokine responses to norovirus infection in Mexican children. J. Nutr. 2011, 141, 957–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chen, B.; Liu, S.; Feng, D.; Xiao, L.; Yang, T.; Li, T.; Sun, W.; Chen, J. Vitamin A deficiency in the early-life periods alters a diversity of the colonic mucosal microbiota in rats. Front. Nutr. 2020, 7, 580780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Patterson, E.; Wall, R.; Fitzgerald, G.F.; Ross, R.P.; Stanton, C. Health implications of high dietary omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids. J. Nutr. Metab. 2012, 2012, 539426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ilag, L.L. Are long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids the link between the immune system and the microbiome towards modulating cancer? Medicines 2018, 5, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Willemsen, L.E.M.; Koetsier, M.A.; Balvers, M.; Beermann, C.; Stahl, B.; van Tol, E.A.F. Polyunsaturated fatty acids support epithelial barrier integrity and reduce IL-4 mediated permeability in vitro. Eur. J. Nutr. 2008, 47, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Shen, J.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Ma, J.; Fang, X.; Das, U.N.; Yao, K. Beneficial actions of essential fatty acids in streptozotocin-induced type 1 diabetes mellitus. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 890277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Man, A.W.C.; Zhou, Y.; Xia, N.; Li, H. Involvement of gut microbiota, microbial metabolites and interaction with polyphenol in host immunometabolism. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Patel, D.; Evanchuk, J.; Wang, R.; Dunbar, C.L.; Munhoz, J.; Field, C.J. Regulation of immune function in healthy adults: One-stop guide on the role of dietary fatty acids, gut microbiota-derived short chain fatty acids, and select micronutrients in combination with physical activity. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2023, 48, 554–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flow diagram of participant enrollment, randomization, and analysis according to the study protocol.
Figure 1. Flow diagram of participant enrollment, randomization, and analysis according to the study protocol.
Foods 14 04090 g001
Figure 2. Effects of 1-Kestose and Inulin supplementation on fecal microbiota diversity and composition. (a) Shannon index at baseline and post-intervention (Post) in the Prebio and Placebo groups. (b) Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) based on weighted UniFrac distances. The first principal coordinate (PC1) is plotted on the x-axis, and the second principal coordinate (PC2) is plotted on the y-axis. (c) Relative abundance of phylum Actinobacteria that were significantly increased in the Prebio group after intervention. (d) Relative abundance of genus Bifidobacterium_388775 within Actinobacteria that significantly increased in the Prebio group post-intervention. Relative abundance of species (e) B. adolescentis and (f) B. longum within Bifidobacterium that significantly increased in the Prebio group post-intervention. p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.001 (***), p < 0.0001 (****). Plots represent individual participants; bars indicate mean ± SEM.
Figure 2. Effects of 1-Kestose and Inulin supplementation on fecal microbiota diversity and composition. (a) Shannon index at baseline and post-intervention (Post) in the Prebio and Placebo groups. (b) Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) based on weighted UniFrac distances. The first principal coordinate (PC1) is plotted on the x-axis, and the second principal coordinate (PC2) is plotted on the y-axis. (c) Relative abundance of phylum Actinobacteria that were significantly increased in the Prebio group after intervention. (d) Relative abundance of genus Bifidobacterium_388775 within Actinobacteria that significantly increased in the Prebio group post-intervention. Relative abundance of species (e) B. adolescentis and (f) B. longum within Bifidobacterium that significantly increased in the Prebio group post-intervention. p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.001 (***), p < 0.0001 (****). Plots represent individual participants; bars indicate mean ± SEM.
Foods 14 04090 g002
Figure 3. Subgroup analysis based on microbial response to prebiotic supplementation. (a) Shannon index at baseline and post-intervention (Post) in responders and non-responders. (b) PCoA based on weighted UniFrac distances. The first principal coordinate (PC1) is plotted on the x-axis, and the second principal coordinate (PC2) is plotted on the y-axis. (c,d) Relative abundances of (c) B. adolescentis and (d) B. longum at Baseline and Post in responders and non-responders. p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.0001 (****). Plots represent individual participants; bars indicate mean ± SEM.
Figure 3. Subgroup analysis based on microbial response to prebiotic supplementation. (a) Shannon index at baseline and post-intervention (Post) in responders and non-responders. (b) PCoA based on weighted UniFrac distances. The first principal coordinate (PC1) is plotted on the x-axis, and the second principal coordinate (PC2) is plotted on the y-axis. (c,d) Relative abundances of (c) B. adolescentis and (d) B. longum at Baseline and Post in responders and non-responders. p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.0001 (****). Plots represent individual participants; bars indicate mean ± SEM.
Foods 14 04090 g003
Figure 4. Abundance of GH32 gene homologs in responders and non-responders in the Prebio group. (a) inuA level at baseline and post-intervention (Post). (b) Changes in inuA abundance (ΔinuA). (c) cscA level at baseline and Post. (d) Changes in cscA abundance (ΔcscA). Gene abundances were quantified using qPCR and normalized to total bacterial 16S rRNA gene copy number. The change in inuA and cscA levels was calculated as the difference between post-intervention and baseline values. Bars indicate mean ± SEM. Pink bars, responders; blue bars, non-responders. p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.1 (#).
Figure 4. Abundance of GH32 gene homologs in responders and non-responders in the Prebio group. (a) inuA level at baseline and post-intervention (Post). (b) Changes in inuA abundance (ΔinuA). (c) cscA level at baseline and Post. (d) Changes in cscA abundance (ΔcscA). Gene abundances were quantified using qPCR and normalized to total bacterial 16S rRNA gene copy number. The change in inuA and cscA levels was calculated as the difference between post-intervention and baseline values. Bars indicate mean ± SEM. Pink bars, responders; blue bars, non-responders. p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.1 (#).
Foods 14 04090 g004
Figure 5. Growth responses of bifidobacteria to fructans. (a) Growth of B. adolescentis and B. longum in Kes-supplemented medium. (b) Growth of B. adolescentis and B. longum in Inu-supplemented medium. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; individual values are shown as dots. p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.0001 (****).
Figure 5. Growth responses of bifidobacteria to fructans. (a) Growth of B. adolescentis and B. longum in Kes-supplemented medium. (b) Growth of B. adolescentis and B. longum in Inu-supplemented medium. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; individual values are shown as dots. p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.0001 (****).
Foods 14 04090 g005
Figure 6. Associations between baseline nutrient intake and microbial GH32 gene response. (a) Spearman’s rank correlation between nutrient intake (zinc, retinol, C16:3 (n-6), and C18:3 (n-3)) and GH32 gene abundance markers (inuA at Baseline, ΔinuA, ΔcscA). (b) Comparison of baseline retinol intake between responders and non-responders. (c) Comparison of baseline C16:3 (n-6) intake between responders and non-responders. p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.1 (#). Bars indicate mean ± SEM; individual values are shown as dots.
Figure 6. Associations between baseline nutrient intake and microbial GH32 gene response. (a) Spearman’s rank correlation between nutrient intake (zinc, retinol, C16:3 (n-6), and C18:3 (n-3)) and GH32 gene abundance markers (inuA at Baseline, ΔinuA, ΔcscA). (b) Comparison of baseline retinol intake between responders and non-responders. (c) Comparison of baseline C16:3 (n-6) intake between responders and non-responders. p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.1 (#). Bars indicate mean ± SEM; individual values are shown as dots.
Foods 14 04090 g006
Figure 7. Associations between food group intake and microbial gene response markers. (a) Heatmap showing Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients between intake of selected food groups and GH32-related response markers (ΔinuA, retinol, and C16:3 (n-6)). (b) Intake of green leafy vegetables in responders and non-responders at baseline. (c) Intake of canned tuna in responders and non-responders at baseline. Food group intakes were assessed using BDHQ at baseline. p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.1 (#). Bars indicate mean ± SEM; individual values are shown as dots.
Figure 7. Associations between food group intake and microbial gene response markers. (a) Heatmap showing Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients between intake of selected food groups and GH32-related response markers (ΔinuA, retinol, and C16:3 (n-6)). (b) Intake of green leafy vegetables in responders and non-responders at baseline. (c) Intake of canned tuna in responders and non-responders at baseline. Food group intakes were assessed using BDHQ at baseline. p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.1 (#). Bars indicate mean ± SEM; individual values are shown as dots.
Foods 14 04090 g007
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the two groups.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the two groups.
Placebo GroupPrebio Groupp-Value
Sex (Male/Female)1/181/17>0.9999
Age (years)20.38 ± 1.1220.68 ± 0.820.4076
Height (cm)156.30 ± 6.19160.54 ± 6.470.0222
Body weight (kg)50.27 ± 5.1852.17 ± 7.930.3383
BMI (calculated from BDHQ)20.57 ± 1.8520.17 ± 2.180.3312
Pre-existing medical conditions1 participant: hay fever1 participant: hay fever>0.9999
Medications and supplements1 participant: Fexofenadine1 participant: Fexofenadine
1 participant: Pyridoxal phosphate, Jumihaidokuto
0.6039
Intake Days27.74 ± 0.1327.06 ± 0.30.0497
Data are presented as mean ± SEM. BDHQ: Brief Self-administered Diet History Questionnaire.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Takahashi, H.; Fujii, T.; Yamada, C.; Kondo, N.; Kuramitsu, K.; Funasaka, K.; Ohno, E.; Hirooka, Y.; Tochio, T.; Fujiki, K. Host Dietary Nutrients Shape GH32-Mediated Microbial Responses to Prebiotic Fructans: A Randomized Trial. Foods 2025, 14, 4090. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14234090

AMA Style

Takahashi H, Fujii T, Yamada C, Kondo N, Kuramitsu K, Funasaka K, Ohno E, Hirooka Y, Tochio T, Fujiki K. Host Dietary Nutrients Shape GH32-Mediated Microbial Responses to Prebiotic Fructans: A Randomized Trial. Foods. 2025; 14(23):4090. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14234090

Chicago/Turabian Style

Takahashi, Hideaki, Tadashi Fujii, Chikako Yamada, Nobuhiro Kondo, Kento Kuramitsu, Kohei Funasaka, Eizaburo Ohno, Yoshiki Hirooka, Takumi Tochio, and Kotoyo Fujiki. 2025. "Host Dietary Nutrients Shape GH32-Mediated Microbial Responses to Prebiotic Fructans: A Randomized Trial" Foods 14, no. 23: 4090. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14234090

APA Style

Takahashi, H., Fujii, T., Yamada, C., Kondo, N., Kuramitsu, K., Funasaka, K., Ohno, E., Hirooka, Y., Tochio, T., & Fujiki, K. (2025). Host Dietary Nutrients Shape GH32-Mediated Microbial Responses to Prebiotic Fructans: A Randomized Trial. Foods, 14(23), 4090. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14234090

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop