Next Article in Journal
Algal Carotenoids: Chemistry, Sources, and Application
Next Article in Special Issue
Metagenomic Insights into the Microbiome and Resistance Genes of Traditional Fermented Foods in Arabia
Previous Article in Journal
Quasi-Targeted Metabolomics Approach Reveal the Metabolite Differences of Three Poultry Eggs
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mechanism of Enhancing Pyrazines in Daqu via Inoculating Bacillus licheniformis with Strains Specificity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Microbial Community Succession and Its Correlation with Quality Characteristics during Gray Sufu Fermentation

1
Key Laboratory of Milk and Dairy Products Detection and Monitoring Technology for State Market Regulation, Shanghai Institute of Quality Inspection and Technical Research, Shanghai 200233, China
2
Department of Microbiology and Microbial Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2023, 12(14), 2767; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12142767
Submission received: 31 May 2023 / Revised: 17 July 2023 / Accepted: 18 July 2023 / Published: 20 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbiology and Genomic Analysis of Fermented Foods)

Abstract

:
Gray sufu, a traditional fermented food derived from soybeans, undergoes a complex fermentation process. This study aimed to investigate the dynamics of the microbial community during sufu fermentation and its relationship with key quality characteristics. Through systematic sampling of sufu at different phases of fermentation, 143 bacterial genera and 84 fungal genera involved in the process were identified. Among these, Chishuiella, Enterococcus, Lactococcus, and Weissella emerged as the predominant bacterial communities. After seven days of ripening fermentation, Trichosporon supplanted Diutina as the predominant fungus, accounting for more than 84% of all fungi. Using redundancy analysis, significant correlations between microbiota and physicochemical properties were uncovered. Chishuiella and Empedobacter displayed positive relationships with pH, soluble protein, and amino nitrogen content. In addition, five biogenic amines were detected, and it was determined that tyramine accounted for more than 75% of the total biogenic amines in the final gray sufu products. Spearman correlation analysis revealed significant positive relationships between Lactococcus, Enterococcus, Tetragenococcus, Halanaerobium, and Trichosporon and the five biogenic amines examined. These findings shed light on the complex interactions between microorganisms and biogenic amines during the fermentation of gray sufu, thereby facilitating the development of microbial regulation strategies for better quality control.

1. Introduction

Fermented foods have been an integral part of human diets for millennia, offering numerous health benefits and enhancing the sensory characteristics of food [1]. A wide variety of foods, such as cereals, milk, fish, and other meats, soybeans, fruits, and vegetables, have been fermented using traditional components [2]. Sufu, a fermented soybean product, has gained popularity in the East as a condiment and dietary supplement [3]. Depending on the types of starter introduced, sufu can be classified into three types: mold-fermented sufu (inoculated with Actinomucor, Mucor, or Rhizopus), bacteria-fermented sufu (inoculated with Bacillus or Micrococcus), and others (naturally inoculated) [4]. Among all sufu types, mold-fermented sufu is the most prevalent [5]. Gray sufu, which has a distinctive aroma and a delightful flavor, is a typical mold-fermented sufu in China. It is receiving attention for its potential health benefits, especially its high levels of the bioavailable ingredient S-equol (4′, 7-dihydroxy-isoflavandiol), which may contribute to preventing bone loss and reducing menopausal symptoms [6]. In addition, gray sufu is a rich source of vitamin B12, making it a valuable supplement for a vegan diet [7]. The processing of gray sufu can be approximately divided into four phases (Figure 1). Firstly, tofu cubes are created by salt precipitation of the boiling soymilk. Starter fungi are then introduced to the tofu cubes, which are incubated until fungal hyphae cover them, forming moldy tofu. The moldy tofu cubes are pickled in salt for several days after removing the mycelium from their surfaces. Afterward, the salt-cured moldy tofu blocks are canned and aged for one to two months in a sealed container with the dressing mixture [8].
The microbial community composition in gray sufu varies significantly due to geographical features and manufacturing environments, as it is produced through open fermentation [9]. In Changchun province of Northeastern China, the core microbial genera identified in gray sufu fermentation were Lactobacillus, Bacillus, Pediococcus, Pseudomonas, Apiotrichum, Sarocladium, and Trichosporon [5]. In Hebei province of North China, Fusobacterium and Providencia were found to be the main microbial genera involved in gray sufu fermentation [10]. However, the microbial communities and their changes during gray sufu fermentation in other regions remain largely unknown. Understanding the dynamic changes and microbial sources in gray sufu fermentation is essential for efficient quality and safety management.
Microorganisms have a significant impact on the physicochemical and safety properties of gray sufu [11]. Various nutritional indicators, including amino nitrogen and soluble protein content, are closely related to the maturity of gray sufu, while pH and NaCl levels are indicators of its quality. Due to its complex microbial structure, gray sufu’s quality can be inconsistent and may pose food safety risks. Biogenic amines (BAs), produced by decarboxylase-producing microorganisms in foods, can pose toxicological risks when consumed in excessive amounts [12]. Detection of BAs in food is, therefore, of great interest due to their potential adverse effects, such as hypertension, vomiting, perspiration, and headaches [13,14]. Regulatory guidelines recommend that the total biogenic amine content in food should not exceed 900 mg/kg [15], with histamine levels not exceeding the legal limit set by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) at 50 mg/kg [16]. Gray sufu, a traditional fermented food with a high amino acid content, may provide a suitable environment for the production of BAs [17]. Monitoring the dynamics of BA distribution and content at different phases of gray sufu production is necessary to elucidate the key technological points associated with BA production.
Shaoxing gray sufu, a mold-fermented product inoculated with Actinomucor, holds a significant market share in eastern China and is gaining popularity as an export. To gain a deeper understanding of the complex fermentation process of Shaoxing gray sufu, a comprehensive study was conducted to investigate the diversity and succession patterns of microbial communities, analyze variations in physicochemical properties, BAs, and amino acid content, and establish correlations between the microbiota and the physicochemical properties and BAs. These results provide a solid foundation for monitoring microbial development and tracing product quality, ultimately enhancing the safety and overall quality of gray sufu.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

In this study, samples were collected from Shaoxing, Zhejiang Province, China. As depicted in Figure 1, pehtze was produced by inoculating tofu cubes with Actinomucor, salting the pehtze for 2 days to produce salted pehtze, then dispersing the salted pehtze into wide-mouthed glass vessels and ripening with the dressing mixture at 25 °C for 35 days. At each phase, three samples were collected to evaluate microbial diversity, physicochemical indicators, biogenic amine content, and amino acid content. The samples were stored at −20 °C.

2.2. Extraction of Nucleic Acids

The tofu cubes (15 g) were crushed and vortexed with 30 mL of sterile water in a sterile bag, and the mixture was incubated at room temperature for 10 min. Then, 10 mL of the sample solution was centrifuged at 3000× g for 5 min. Subsequently, the supernatant was transferred to a new tube and centrifuged at 10,000× g for 5 min to collect the precipitate. After washing the precipitate twice with 5 mL of sterile water, nucleic acid extraction was performed using the CTAB method [18]. The extracted DNA samples were eluted in 100 µL of TE buffer (prepared from 1M stock Tris-Cl (pH 7.5) and 500 mM stock EDTA (pH 8.0)), and their quality was assessed by measuring the OD260/OD280 and OD260/OD230 ratios with a Nanodrop 2000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, MA, USA) [19]. DNA quantification was performed using a Qubit 3.0 Fluorometer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and a dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) [20]. Quantification was performed using the included DNA standards of 0 ng/μL and 10 ng/μL according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The samples were stored at −20 °C.

2.3. PCR Amplification and Sequencing

The bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences were amplified with primers 338F (5′-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3′) and 806R (5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′) [21]. For the fungal ITS region, primers ITS1F (5′-CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-3′) and ITS2R (5′-GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC-3′) were used [22]. The 20 μL PCR amplification system consisted of 4 μL of 5×FastPfu buffer, 2 μL of dNTPs (2.5 mM), 0.8 μL of forward primer (5 μM), 0.8 μL of reverse primer (5 μM), 0.4 μL of FastPfu polymerase, 0.2 μL of BSA, 10 ng of template DNA, and deionized water. PCR amplification was carried out on an ABI GeneAmp® 9700 (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) with the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 45 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min [23]. The amplified products were purified using the AxyPrep DNA Gel Extraction Kit (AXYGEN Biosciences, Union City, CA, USA) [24] and then sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform by Major Bio (Shanghai, China).
The data were analyzed using the Major Bio i-Sanger Cloud Platform (www.i-sanger.com, accessed from 15–30 March 2023) [25]. Details of the analysis are described below. The raw data underwent quality filtration using Fastp software (version 0.19.6, https://github.com/OpenGene/fastp, accessed on 15 March 2023) to remove low-quality sequences [26]. Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were obtained by dereplicating, removing singletons, and deblocking chimeric sequences using Usearch software (version 7.0, http://www.drive5.com/usearch/, accessed on 24 March 2023) with a 97% similarity clustering threshold [27]. For bacterial taxonomy assignment, the Silva database (Release 138, http://www.arb-silva.de, accessed on 25 March 2023) was employed [28], and for fungal taxonomy assignment, the Unite database (Release 8.0, http://unite.ut.ee/index.php, accessed on 26 March 2023) was used [29]. Taxonomic assignment was performed using the RDP classifier implemented in QIIME software (version 1.9.1, http://qiime.org/scripts/assign_taxonomy.html, accessed on 30 March 2023) [30]. To improve the accuracy of tracking microbial community evolution during sufu fermentation, the following screening criteria were applied to the OTUs: removal of OTUs that matched chloroplast and mitochondrial sequences and determination of parity based on the minimum sample sequence number [31,32].

2.4. Physicochemical Analysis

The pH levels of the samples were determined in accordance with the GB 5009.237–2016 National Standard for Food Safety. A total of 2 g of the sample was transferred to a 50 mL beaker, followed by the addition of 18 mL of pre-boiled and cooled distilled water. The mixture was then stirred to ensure homogeneity, and the pH of the solution was measured at 20 °C using a pH meter (FE28-m, Mettler Toledo, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland) [33].
The salt content of the sample was measured in compliance with GB 5009.44-2016 National Standard for Food Safety by following a method that involved the addition of a 10 g of sample to 50 mL of 70 °C water, sonication for 20 min, cooling to room temperature, and filtration. Then, an equal volume of water was added to 50 mL of the filtrate, and the solution was titrated with AgNO3 (1 M) using 10% (w/v) K2CrO4 (1 mL) as an indicator. The volume of titrant required to change the color of the solution from yellow to orange was then recorded.
The evaluation of moisture content, total acid, amino nitrogen, and soluble protein content in the samples followed the PRC Domestic Trade Industry Standard SB/T 10170-2007 with minor modifications. To determine the moisture content of the samples, 5 g of the samples was dried continuously at 105 °C. The difference in mass before and after drying was used to calculate the moisture content. Total acid and amino nitrogen content were determined by mixing 20 g of sample with 80 mL of 60 °C water, boiling, cooling, and filtering. An automated potentiometric titrator was used to determine the amount of NaOH (0.05 M) used for titration. Filtrate (10 mL) was combined with 50 mL of water, and the titration was conducted at pH 8.2 for total acid calculation and at pH 9.0 for amino nitrogen calculation. For the soluble protein assay, the pretreatment was similar to that of the total acid samples. Filtrate (10 mL) was combined with 15 mL of HCl (1 M) and digestion tablets in a digestion tube. After achieving a green and transparent liquid in the digestion tube, the solution was allowed to cool. The resulting solution was distilled and titrated using a fully automated protein tester.

2.5. Biogenic Amines and Amino Acids Analysis

To analyze BA content, the method proposed by Ochi et al. was adapted as follows [34]. A 1 g sample was mixed with 10 mL of extraction solution (acetonitrile:water:formic acid = 70:29:1), followed by vortexing for dispersion and sonication for 30 min. After centrifugation at 8000× g for 2 min, the supernatant was filtered through a 0.22 μm PTFE membrane to obtain the sample solution. The BA content was determined using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods. Liquid chromatography was performed using an Agilent Prooshell PFP (4.6 mm × 100 mm, 4 μm) column with gradient elution of mobile phase A (0.1% formic acid aqueous solution) and mobile phase B (acetonitrile). During the 11-min run, the percentage of mobile phase A varied as follows: 0–1 min, 95% A; 1–6 min, linear decrease in A from 95% to 0%; 6–8 min, 0% A; 8–11 min, increase in A to 95%, followed by 2 min of equilibration. The injection volume was set to 2 μL and the injection flow rate to 0.3 mL/min. For mass spectrometry analysis, positive ionization mode with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source was employed, utilizing the following parameters: capillary voltage of 3.0 kV, cone well voltage of 30 V, drying gas temperature of 400 °C, drying gas flow rate of 800 L/h, cone well blowback gas flow rate of 150 L/h, and ion source temperature of 150 °C. Specific information on parameters such as ion pairs, collision energies, and elution time of each biogenic amine was presented in Supplementary Table S1. Histamine, putrescine, and tyramine standard products were purchased from Shanghai Yuanye Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Phenethylamine and cadaverine standard products were obtained from Tmstandard Company (Beijing, China).
To investigate the relationship between biogenic amine synthesis and amino acid metabolism, the amino acid content of each sample was determined according to the GB 5009.124-2016 National Standard for Food Safety. A hydrolysis tube containing 1 g of sufu sample and 10 mL of 6 mol/L hydrochloric acid solution underwent a freezing step for 5 min, followed by evacuation and placement at a controlled temperature of 110 ± 1 °C for hydrolysis. The hydrolysate was filtered and adjusted to a final volume of 50 mL. A 1.0 mL aliquot of the filtrate was then subjected to reduced-pressure drying, followed by reconstitution in an equal volume of sodium citrate buffer solution (pH 2.2). The resulting solution was further filtered through a 0.22 μm membrane to obtain the sample solution. Subsequently, 20 µL of the sample solution was injected into a high-speed amino acid analyzer (High-speed Amino Acid Analyzer L-8900, Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a Hitachi custom ion exchange column (Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Method details are described in Supplementary Table S2. The results were expressed as mg/100 g sufu, referring to an amino acid mixture standard (First Standard®, Alta Scientific, Tianjin, China).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Each experiment was performed thrice. The results were subjected to one-way ANOVA analysis and Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests using Graphpad Prism (version 6.0), with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Redundancy analysis (RDA) was applied to assess the relationship between abundant microorganisms (OUT > 1%) and physicochemical properties using Canoco (version 5.0, http://www.canoco5.com/, accessed on 6 April 2023). Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the correlations between the 50 most abundant microbial taxa and BAs. A heatmap was generated using pheatmap R packages (version 3.3.1).

3. Results

3.1. Dynamics of Bacterial Community

After quality control and screening, 27,640 bacterial sequences per sample were obtained, and 303 bacterial OTUs were identified. A phylum and genus level classification of bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences was carried out in order to find out what makes up the bacterial community in gray sufu. In total, 13 phyla and 143 genera were identified. It was found that Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria exhibited a relative abundance greater than 1% (Figure 2A). Among the 143 genera, the relative abundance of 17 genera all exceeded 1% (Figure 2B). In tofu, Weissella was the dominant genus. Chishuiella (from 0.99% to 50.71%), as well as Acinetobacter (from 2.31% to 16.18%) and Enterococcus (from 3.28% to 13.05%), increased rapidly in pehtze. Chishuiella reached its maximum relative abundance of 61.99% after salting. It was found that Chishuiella, Enterococcus, Lactococcus, and Weissella accounted for more than 76% of the relative abundance during the fermentation process. However, the relative abundance of Chishuiella decreased to approximately 3% after 35 days of ripening fermentation. As fermentation progressed, the relative abundance of Enterococcus increased, and that of Lactococcus and Weissella fluctuated. In addition, Acinetobacter abundance decreased continuously during the ripening process.

3.2. Dynamics of Fungal Community

A total of 31,928 fungal sequences were obtained per sample after quality control and screening, and 197 fungal OTUs were identified. The ITS gene sequences of fungi were classified at the phylum and genus levels in order to understand the dynamics of the fungal community during the fermentation of gray sufu. The gray sufu contained a total of 5 phyla and 84 genera. Four phyla, such as Basidiomycota, Ascomycota, and Mucoromycota (Figure 3A), exhibited relative abundances greater than 1%. Eleven of the eighty-four detected genera possessed relative abundances above 1%. The results showed that tofu samples had a sizable proportion of Diutina (53.54%). In pehtze samples, Trichospron (44.78%) and Diutina (41.87%) were the predominant genera. In salted pehtze samples, the proportion of Diutina was 96.75%. After 3 days of ripening fermentation, a significant shift in the dominant fungal genus was observed in our study. Trichospron replaced Diutina as the prevailing fungus, constituting over 84% of all fungi after 7 days of ripening fermentation (Figure 3B).

3.3. Physicochemical Properties during Sufu Fermentation

The variations in pH, total acid, moisture, salinity, amino nitrogen, and soluble protein during sufu fermentation are depicted in Figure 4. The original pH of tofu was 5.43, which climbed to 6.20 after inoculation, reduced to 5.77 during salted pehtze, and then raised to 6.33 towards the end of fermentation. The total acid content of tofu was 0.84 g/100 g, which decreased to 0.33 g/100 g after 3 days of ripening fermentation. As fermentation progressed, the total acid content tended to first increase and then decrease. During fermentation, proteases produced by microorganisms hydrolyze proteins [35], resulting in an increase in the levels of amino nitrogen and soluble protein to 0.87 g/100 g and 6.35 g/100 g, respectively. The salinity of tofu and pehtze was minimal, but it increased to 16.40 g/100 g in salted pehtze and remained over 10 g/100 g until the end of fermentation. The moisture content and salinity showed approximately opposing tendencies.

3.4. Biogenic Amine Production and Amino Acid Content during Sufu Fermentation

During the production of sufu, five BAs were detected, and the concentration of these BAs changed, as shown in Figure 5. After 35 days of ripening fermentation, the total biogenic amine content reached 396.80 mg/kg. In this study, tyramine and putrescine were identified as the primary BAs generated during the production of gray sufu. At the end of fermentation, the content of tyramine reached 297.78 mg/kg, which was much higher than the content of other BAs. The production of putrescine, histamine, and cadaverine began in salted pehtze and increased as fermentation advanced. As shown in Figure 5, putrescine levels reached 52.79 mg/kg at the end of fermentation, while histamine and cadaverine levels remained below 30 mg/kg throughout the manufacturing process. The fermentation process also produced 7.64 mg/kg of phenylethylamine.
Microorganisms employ amino acid decarboxylases to transform precursor amino acids into BAs [36]. Histidine is the precursor of histamine [37], while glutamate and arginine are needed to produce putrescine [38,39]. The lysine, tyrosine, and phenylalanine are utilized to produce cadaverine, tyramine, and phenylethylamine [40,41], respectively. After 14 days of ripening fermentation, glutamate was discovered to be the most prevalent amino acid, with a concentration of 609.95 mg/100 g sufu (Figure 6A). Decarboxylating microorganisms used the accumulated amino acids to produce the BAs, causing the level of the six amino acids to increase and subsequently decline. Arginine levels declined immediately (7 days) (Figure 6B), followed by lysine (14 days) (Figure 6C), and the other four amino acids exhibited different degrees of decrease at 21 days (Figure 6A,D–F). Variability in the timing of the drops of the levels of different amino acids suggested that the peak synthesis of BAs was probably dynamic. The lower production of phenylethylamine can be explained by less reduction in phenylalanine level (Figure 6F). Furthermore, the degree of amino acid consumption demonstrated that tyramine and putrescine were the major BAs in these samples of gray sufu.

3.5. Correlations between Microbiota and Physicochemical Properties during Sufu Fermentation

To investigate the interplay between microorganisms and the physicochemical properties of gray sufu, a redundancy analysis was conducted using the abundant genera (OUT > 1%) in relation to specific physicochemical properties (Figure 7). As depicted in Figure 7A, positive correlations were observed between Pediococcus, Weissella, and Lactobacillus with respect to total acid content and salinity. Lactococcus and Enterococcus exhibited negative correlation coefficients with moisture content and pH, while Chryseibacterium and Acinetobacter displayed positive correlation coefficients with these properties. Chishuiella and Empedobacter showed positive associations with soluble protein and amino nitrogen and demonstrated negative correlations with total acid content. In Figure 7B, the relationships between dominant fungi and physicochemical properties are illustrated. Diutina displayed positive correlation coefficients with pH, moisture content, soluble protein, and amino nitrogen, while exhibiting negative correlation coefficients with total acid content. In contrast, Trichospron demonstrated positive correlation coefficients with total acid content and negative correlation coefficients with pH, moisture content, soluble protein, and amino nitrogen.

3.6. Correlations between Microbiota and Biogenic Amine during Sufu Fermentation

Based on Spearman’s correlation coefficients and p-values, correlations between BAs and the 50 most abundant genera were examined. In this study, correlations between 28 bacterial genera and BAs were statistically significant (p < 0.05) (Figure 8A). Among these genera, Lactococcus, Enterococcus, Tetragenococcus, and Halanaerobium demonstrated significant positive correlations with each biogenic amine (p < 0.001), while Acinetobacter demonstrated substantial negative correlations with each biogenic amine (p < 0.01). As opposed to the other four BAs, Paracoccus, Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, Weissella, Staphylococcus, and Leucobacter were positively related to phenethylamine (p < 0.05). Thermobrachium, Selenomonas, Megasphaera, Clostridium sensu stricto 8, and Myroides were strongly negatively linked with the other four BAs, with the exception of phenylethylamine (p < 0.05). In terms of fungi, 22 genera were discovered to be significantly correlated with BAs (p < 0.05), with the majority exhibiting a negative connection (Figure 8B). Trichosporon, unlike Diutina, showed significant positive correlations with five BAs. In addition, the distribution of correlations between phenylethylamine and fungal communities differed significantly from that of the other four BAs.

4. Discussion

Gray sufu, a popular plant-based food product known for its distinctive flavor, is widely consumed in China and certain regions of Asia [42]. The production of gray sufu involves an open fermentation process, exposing the fermentation matrix to diverse environmental microorganisms (Figure 1). This fermentation environment leads to the formation of a spatially specific microbial community structure of gray sufu. Furthermore, the complex microbial structure and protein-rich nature of gray sufu create conditions conducive to biogenic amine (BA) production, which can accumulate during fermentation and pose risks to the safety and quality of the final product. This study focused on Shaoxing gray sufu, a widely consumed variety in eastern China, aiming to gain a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between microbial communities, physicochemical characteristics, and BA production.
In this study, the 16S rRNA gene sequences indicated that Weissella, rather than Cyanobacteria as reported by Liang et al. [43], was the predominant genus in tofu, aligning with the findings of Gu et al. [44]. As depicted in Figure 2A, the abundances of Chishuiella, Acinetobacter, and Enterococcus increased rapidly from tofu to pehtze phases. Chishuiella, known to be abundant in the brine of gray sufu, is a freshwater bacterium, while Acinetobacter represents widespread environmental bacterial contaminants [45]. Therefore, the rise in Chishuiella and Acinetobacter may be attributed to either the water or the environment. In contrast to Chishuiella and Acinetobacter, whose populations declined towards the end of fermentation, Enterococcus continued to expand as fermentation progressed (Figure 2). In this study, Chishuiella, Enterococcus, Lactococcus, and Weissella emerged as the dominant bacterial genera involved in gray sufu fermentation. It is worth noting that the variation in samples may account for the inconsistent findings compared to previous studies. In gray sufu products from Changchun province, Lactobacillus, Bacillus, Pediococcus, and Pseudomonas were the core bacterial genera. In fermented soybean products from Korea, Tetragenococcus, Leuconostoc, Lactobacillus, and Enterococcus were the predominant bacteria [46]. In doubanjiang-meju produced from broad beans in China, Tetragenococcus, Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, and Staphylococcus were the prevailing genera during fermentation [47]. Tetragenococcus, known as halophilic lactic acid bacteria, typically dominates in fermented foods. However, in our study, Tetragenococcus did not appear to be a significant genus. Biological diversity in products can be greatly influenced by bacteria in the native environment. Regarding fungi, the abundance of Diutina and Trichosporon showed a fluctuating pattern, with Trichosporon constituting over 90% of the final product (Figure 3). Liang et al. reported that Trichosporon was most prevalent in raw tofu, while Aspergillus became the most abundant fungus in gray sufu products [48]. Thus, the variation in the microbial community may be attributed to differences in raw material sources, fermentation conditions, and procedures.
In fermented foods, pH and salinity play a crucial role not only in determining microbial structure but also in determining their quality and shelf life [49]. The pH value in tofu was the lowest (5.43) and significantly higher at the pehtze phase than at the tofu phase, as reported previously [50]. This pH increase is likely attributed to the enzymatic activity of microorganisms involved in the breakdown of tofu proteins into amino acids, followed by deamination processes that result in ammonia formation during the pehtze phase [51]. Additionally, changes in total acid content did not correspond to changes in pH during ripening fermentation, indicating that other factors may influence the pH of the samples (Figure 4A). Amino acid nitrogen and soluble protein are important nutrients present in gray sufu that can be readily absorbed, serving as indicators of the fermentation degree of gray sufu [5]. Proteolysis played a significant role as gray sufu aged with the dressing mixture, decomposing proteins into small molecular peptides and amino acids, subsequently increasing amino nitrogen content (Figure 4B) [52]. By the end of fermentation, the soluble protein content of the samples reached 6.35 g/100 g sufu, highlighting gray sufu as an excellent source of easily absorbed proteins (Figure 4B). Salinity peaked during the salted pehtze phase and significantly decreased after dressing mixture addition (p < 0.05) (Figure 4C). Due to similar osmotic pressures between sufu and mixture, salinity levels converged during ripening [5]. Moisture content showed a reciprocal relationship with salinity and remained stable after a period of ripening, consistent with previous studies [51]. Moreover, future studies should incorporate sensory analysis to evaluate attributes such as taste, texture, aroma, and appearance, providing a holistic assessment of gray sufu’s quality characteristics.
BAs are a group of small nitrogen-containing compounds produced through the decarboxylation of amino acids. Ingesting high levels of BAs can lead to abdominal cramps, headaches, and flushing [53]. This study investigated the changes in the content of five BAs during the fermentation of Shaoxing gray sufu (Figure 5). At the end of fermentation, the average levels of total BAs in gray sufu were 396.80 mg/kg, with phenylethylamine, histamine, cadaverine, putrescine, and tyramine averaging 7.64, 18.16, 20.43, 52.79, and 297.78 mg/kg, respectively. Due to their high toxicity, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) recommends that a single dose of histamine or tyramine not exceed 50 mg or 600 mg, respectively [54]. Brink et al. suggested that levels of histamine, tyramine, and phenylethylamine in food should be below 100, 800, and 30 mg/kg, respectively [55]. Using these recommendations as a benchmark, there was no probable exceedance in the samples collected for this study. However, considering the potential synergistic effects of various BAs [56], further research is required to establish maximum limits for combinations of different BAs.
Fermentation of protein-rich raw materials, such as soybeans, provides abundant precursor amino acids for BA synthesis [57]. The levels of six precursor amino acids were determined in order to gain insight into the process of synthesis of BAs during gray sufu fermentation (Figure 6). These amino acids were histidine, glutamate, arginine, lysine, tyrosine, and phenylalanine. The levels of these amino acids fluctuated, indicating their utilization in BA synthesis at different phases. Putrescine synthesis involves the decarboxylation of arginine by arginine decarboxylase (ADC) or the utilization of glutamate to synthesize N-acetylglutamate-5-phosphate, which is further converted to ornithine through ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) [58]. Consequently, glutamate was utilized for putrescine synthesis in the absence of arginine.
Redundancy analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between abundant microorganisms (OUT > 1%) and physicochemical factors (Figure 7). Among the bacterial genera analyzed, Lactobacillus demonstrated positive correlations with total acid content and salinity, while Chishuiella displayed positive associations with amino nitrogen and soluble protein. However, Enterobacter and Leuconostoc exhibited negative correlations with amino nitrogen, contrary to the findings reported by Liang et al. [43]. Similarly, Enterococcus showed opposing correlations with amino acid nitrogen in the studies conducted by Liang et al. [43] and Ding et al. [5]. Regarding the fungal genera, Trichosporon and Diutina were identified as the dominant genera. The RDA results indicated that Trichosporon exhibited positive correlation coefficients with total acid content but negative correlation coefficients with amino nitrogen, soluble protein, pH, moisture content, and salinity. On the other hand, Diutina displayed a positive correlation with pH, soluble protein, amino nitrogen, and moisture content while showing a negative correlation with total acid content. Previously, Diutina was not studied, and Trichosporon showed a negative correlation with moisture content and pH but a positive correlation with amino nitrogen [43]. Therefore, it is important to recognize that microbial communities are highly complex and dynamic, and their interactions with physicochemical factors can be intricate. The relationships between microorganisms and physicochemical properties are not always straightforward and can be influenced by various factors, such as the specific conditions of the fermentation process, the composition of the raw materials, and the presence of other microorganisms. Some of the observed differences may be the result of specific interactions or adaptations of certain bacterial genera in response to the unique conditions of each study. The underlying mechanisms behind the observed differences between certain bacterial genera and physicochemical factors require further investigation.
Furthermore, a Spearman correlation analysis was performed to investigate the relationships between BAs and the 50 most abundant genera of bacteria or fungi (Figure 8). The results indicated that bacteria exhibited significantly higher correlations with BAs compared to fungi, consistent with previous studies [59]. Among bacteria, 28 genera showed statistically significant correlations (p < 0.05) with BAs (Figure 8A). Acinetobacter exhibited significant negative correlations with all five BAs, while Lactococcus, Enterococcus, Tetragenococcus, and Halanaerobium showed significant positive correlations with these BAs (p < 0.001). Introduced from the environment, Lactococcus and Tetragenococcus increase the content of biogenic amines, which are decarboxylated to produce free amino acids [60]. The association pattern between phenylethylamine and bacterial communities was different from that of the other four BAs, which was similar to the findings of Ding et al. [5]. Selenomonas, Myroides, and Megasphaera were significantly negatively correlated with the other four BAs, except for phenylethylamine (p < 0.05). Similarly, significant associations were observed between 22 fungal genera and BAs, with most of them exhibiting negative correlations (Figure 8B). Trichosporon showed significant positive correlations with all five BAs, unlike Diutina.
In summary, our study provides a robust foundation for future research and practical applications in the field of gray sufu fermentation. Future investigations involving functional metagenomics, isolation of BA-producing and BA-degrading strains, exploration of microbial interactions, and sensory analyses will further advance our understanding of the complex microbial dynamics associated with sufu fermentation. This knowledge will enable the development of targeted strategies to mitigate biogenic amine production, enhance food safety, and improve the overall quality of gray sufu products. Ultimately, these endeavors will benefit both the scientific community and consumers by ensuring the production of high-quality and safe gray sufu products.

5. Conclusions

This study provided novel insights into the intricate microbiological structure of Shaoxing gray sufu fermentation. The predominant bacterial genera involved in sufu fermentation, including Chishuiella, Enterococcus, Lactococcus, and Weissella, were identified. Over the ripening process, the dominant fungus shifted from Diutina to Trichosporon. The BA content in gray sufu reached a peak of 396.80 mg/kg by the end of fermentation, with tyramine accounting for over 75% of the total BA content. Through redundancy analysis and Spearman correlation coefficients, it was demonstrated that the dominant microorganisms played a significant role in influencing the quality and safety of gray sufu. These microorganisms exhibited strong correlations with physicochemical parameters and biogenic amine production. Exploring and manipulating the microbial composition of gray sufu presents a promising strategy to enhance the overall quality of sufu. Future research endeavors will focus on isolating and identifying functional microorganisms that are relevant for improving the texture and sensory properties of gray sufu and promoting biogenic amine degradation. Comparative analyses of microbial community diversity in sufu raw materials, production processes, and products from different producers will be essential for the development of standardized fermented food safety guidelines.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods12142767/s1. Table S1: The condition of information on ion pairs, collision energies, and elution times for each biogenic amine; Table S2: The condition of amino acid analyzer.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.L. and J.Z.; methodology, Y.L., L.Z., Q.Q., Y.Y., Q.X. and J.Z.; software, L.Z., G.Z., X.X. and Q.Z. (Qingping Zhang); validation, L.Z., Y.Z. (Yinan Zhang), Q.X., J.C., N.Z., Y.W., Y.Z. (Yuzhu Zhang), Y.S. and Q.Z. (Qin Zhao); formal analysis, L.Z., Y.Y., Q.X., G.Z. and X.X.; investigation, Y.L., L.Z. and Q.X.; resources, Y.L., L.Z. and Q.X.; data curation, Y.L., L.Z. and Q.X.; writing—original draft preparation, L.Z.; writing—review and editing, Y.L. and J.Z.; visualization, L.Z. and Q.X.; supervision, Y.L.; project administration, Y.L.; funding acquisition, Y.L., L.Z. and Q.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Science and Technology Project of General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, grant number 2017QK167, the Science and Technology Project of the Shanghai Institute of Quality Inspection and Technical Research, grant number KY-2021-1-SP, and the Science and Technology Project of the Shanghai Municipal Market Supervision Administration, grant number 2022-49.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or Supplementary Material.

Acknowledgments

We thank Shanghai Major Bio for helping with high-throughput data analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors all declared no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work in this manuscript.

References

  1. Azam, M.; Mohsin, M.; Ijaz, H.; Tulain, U.R.; Ashraf, M.A.; Fayyaz, A.; Ul Abadeen, Z.; Kamran, Q. Lactic acid bacteria in traditional fermented Asian foods. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 30, 1803–1814. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Bourdichon, F.; Casaregola, S.; Farrokh, C.; Frisvad, J.C.; Gerds, M.L.; Hammes, W.P.; Harnett, J.; Huys, G.; Laulund, S.; Ouwehand, A.; et al. Food fermentations: Microorganisms with technological beneficial use. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 154, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Han, B.Z.; Beumer, R.R.; Rombouts, M.F.; Nout, M.J.R. Microbiological safety and quality of commercial sufu—A Chinese fermented soybean food. Food Control 2001, 12, 541–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Han, B.Z.; Cao, C.F.; Rombouts, M.F.; Nout, M.J.R. Microbial changes during the production of sufu—A Chinese fermented soybean food. Food Control 2004, 15, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ding, S.Q.; Tian, M.; Yang, L.; Pan, Y.; Suo, L.L.; Zhu, X.M.; Ren, D.Y.; Yu, H.S. Diversity and dynamics of microbial population during fermentation of gray sufu and their correlation with quality characteristics. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 180, 114711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jou, H.J.; Tsai, P.J.; Tu, J.H.; Wu, W.H. Stinky tofu as a rich source of bioavailable S-equol in Asian diets. J. Funct. Foods 2013, 5, 651–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, S.N.; Han, Y.; Zhou, Z.J. Lactic acid bacteria in traditional fermented Chinese foods. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 643–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. He, W.; Chen, Z.; Chung, H.Y. Dynamic correlations between major enzymatic activities, physicochemical properties and targeted volatile compounds in naturally fermented plain sufu during production. Food Chem. 2022, 378, 131988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chao, S.H.; Tomii, Y.; Watanabe, K.; Tsai, Y.C. Diversity of lactic acid bacteria in fermented brines used to make stinky tofu. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 123, 134–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Song, Z.; Hu, Y.; Chen, X.; Li, G.; Zhong, Q.; He, X.; Xu, W. Correlation between bacterial community succession and propionic acid during gray sufu fermentation. Food Chem. 2021, 353, 129447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, Y.H.; Liu, X.W.; Huang, J.L.; Baloch, S.; Xu, X.; Pei, X.F. Microbial diversity and chemical analysis of Shuidouchi, traditional Chinese fermented soybean. Food Res. Int. 2019, 116, 1289–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Schirone, M.; Tofalo, R.; Fasoli, G.; Perpetuini, G.; Corsetti, A.; Manetta, A.C.; Ciarrocchi, A.; Suzzi, G. High content of biogenic amines in Pecorino cheeses. Food Microbiol. 2013, 34, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Alvarez, M.A.; Moreno-Arribas, M.V. The problem of biogenic amines in fermented foods and the use of potential biogenic amine-degrading microorganisms as a solution. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 39, 146–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Guan, R.F.; Liu, Z.F.; Zhang, J.J.; Wei, Y.X.; Wahab, S.; Liu, D.H.; Ye, X.Q. Investigation of biogenic amines in sufu (furu): A Chinese traditional fermented soybean food product. Food Control 2013, 31, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Spanjer, M.C.; Roode, B.A.S.W. Towards a regulatory limit for biogenic amines in fish, cheese and sauerkraut. Ware (N)-Chem. 1991, 21, 139–167. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zare, D.; Muhammad, K.; Bejo, M.H.; Ghazali, H.M. Determination of urocanic acid, a compound implicated in histamine toxicity, and assessment of biogenic amines relative to urocanic acid content in selected fish and fish products. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2015, 37, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, Z.F.; Wei, Y.X.; Zhang, J.J.; Liu, D.H.; Hu, Y.Q.; Ye, X.Q. Changes in biogenic amines during the conventional production of stinky tofu. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 46, 687–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Allen, G.C.; Flores-Vergara, M.A.; Krasynanski, S.; Kumar, S.; Thompson, W.F. A modified protocol for rapid DNA isolation from plant tissues using cetyltrimethylammonium bromide. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1, 2320–2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, C.; Li, S.L.; Nie, Q.; Dong, S.; Shao, Y.; Yang, X.N.; Wu, Y.L.; Yang, Y.; Zhong, W.Z. Neoadjuvant crizotinib in resectable locally advanced non–small cell lung cancer with ALK rearrangement. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2019, 14, 726–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Emam, A.; Wu, X.; Xu, S.; Wang, L.; Liu, S.; Wang, B. Stalled replication fork protection limits cGAS–STING and P-body-dependent innate immune signalling. Nat. Cell Biol. 2022, 24, 1154–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zeng, Q.; An, S. Identifying the biogeographic patterns of pare and abundant bacterial communities using different primer sets on the loess plateau. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ma, Y.; Gao, W.; Zhang, F.; Zhu, X.; Kong, W.; Niu, S.; Gao, K.; Yang, H. Community composition and trophic mode diversity of fungi associated with fruiting body of medicinal Sanghuangporus vaninii. BMC Microbiol. 2022, 22, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xing, H.; Liu, H.; Pan, J. High-throughput sequencing of oral microbiota in Candida carriage sjögren’s syndrome patients: A pilot cross-sectional study. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Liu, K.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, G.; Zheng, N.; Zhao, S.; Wang, J. Ruminal bacterial community is associated with the variations of total milk solid content in Holstein lactating cows. Anim. Nutr. 2022, 9, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ren, Y.; Yu, G.; Shi, C.; Liu, L.; Guo, Q.; Han, C.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, L.; Liu, B.; Gao, H.; et al. Majorbio Cloud: A one-stop, comprehensive bioinformatic platform for multiomics analyses. iMeta 2022, 1, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, S.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, Y.; Gu, J. fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, i884–i890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Nguyen, N.P.; Warnow, T.; Pop, M.; White, B. A perspective on 16S rRNA operational taxonomic unit clustering using sequence similarity. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2016, 2, 16004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Quast, C.; Pruesse, E.; Yilmaz, P.; Gerken, J.; Schweer, T.; Yarza, P.; Peplies, J.; Glöckner, F.O. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, D590–D596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nilsson, R.H.; Larsson, K.H.; Taylor, A.F.S.; Bengtsson-Palme, J.; Jeppesen, T.S.; Schigel, D.; Kennedy, P.; Picard, K.; Glöckner, F.O.; Tedersoo, L.; et al. The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi: Handling dark taxa and parallel taxonomic classifications. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D259–D264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Eldred, L.E.; Thorn, R.G.; Smith, D.R. Simple matching using QIIME 2 and RDP reveals misidentified sequences and an underrepresentation of fungi in reference datasets. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 768473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rogers, M.B.; Firek, B.; Shi, M.; Yeh, A.; Brower-Sinning, R.; Aveson, V.; Kohl, B.L.; Fabio, A.; Carcillo, J.A.; Morowitz, M.J. Disruption of the microbiota across multiple body sites in critically ill children. Microbiome 2016, 4, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Hartman, K.; van der Heijden, M.G.A.; Wittwer, R.A.; Banerjee, S.; Walser, J.C.; Schlaeppi, K. Cropping practices manipulate abundance patterns of root and soil microbiome members paving the way to smart farming. Microbiome 2018, 6, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Liu, Z.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Gong, H.; Hou, R.; Sun, Z.; Ouyang, Z. Soil microbes from saline-alkali farmland can form carbonate precipitates. Agronomy 2023, 13, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ochi, N. Simultaneous determination of eight underivatized biogenic amines in salted mackerel fillet by ion-pair solid-phase extraction and volatile ion-pair reversed-phase liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2019, 1601, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Lv, M.; Shao, Z.; Hungwe, M.; Wang, J.; Bai, X.; Xie, J.; Wang, Y.; Geng, W. Metabolism characteristics of lactic acid bacteria and the expanding applications in food industry. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 612285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lin, Z.; Wu, Z.Y.; Zhang, W.X. Bioinformatics analysis of amino acid decarboxylases related to four major biogenic amines in pickles. Food Chem. 2022, 393, 133339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Huang, H.; Li, Y.; Liang, J.; Finkelman, F.D. Molecular regulation of histamine synthesis. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Lieu, E.L.; Nguyen, T.; Rhyne, S.; Kim, J. Amino acids in cancer. Exp. Mol. Med. 2020, 52, 15–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hui, H.; Bai, Y.; Fan, T.P.; Zheng, X.; Cai, Y. Biosynthesis of putrescine from L-arginine using engineered Escherichia coli whole cells. Catalysts 2020, 10, 947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Marcobal, A.; De Las Rivas, B.; Landete, J.M.; Tabera, L.; Muñoz, R. Tyramine and phenylethylamine biosynthesis by food bacteria. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2012, 52, 448–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Zhou, N.; Zhang, A.; Wei, G.; Yang, S.; Xu, S.; Chen, K.; Ouyang, P. Cadaverine production from L-lysine with chitin-binding protein-mediated lysine decarboxylase immobilization. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Qiu, S.; Wang, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yadav, M.P.; Yin, L. Reduction of biogenic amines in sufu by ethanol addition during ripening stage. Food Chem. 2018, 239, 1244–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Liang, J.; Li, D.; Shi, R.; Wang, J.; Guo, S.; Ma, Y.; Xiong, K. Effects of microbial community succession on volatile profiles and biogenic amine during sufu fermentation. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 114, 108379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gu, J.; Liu, T.; Hou, J.; Pan, L.; Sadiq, F.A.; Yuan, L.; Yang, H.; He, G. Analysis of bacterial diversity and biogenic amines content during the fermentation processing of stinky tofu. Food Res. Int. 2018, 111, 689–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Shaffer, B.T.; Lighthart, B. Survey of culturable airborne bacteria at four diverse locations in Oregon: Urban, rural, forest, and coastal. Microb. Ecol. 1997, 34, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kim, M.J.; Kwak, H.S.; Jung, H.Y.; Kim, S.S. Microbial communities related to sensory attributes in Korean fermented soy bean paste (doenjang). Food Res. Int. 2016, 89, 724–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, Z.; Rui, J.; Li, X.; Li, J.; Dong, L.; Huang, Q.; Huang, C.; Wang, Z.; Li, L.; Xuan, P.; et al. Bacterial community succession and metabolite changes during doubanjiang-meju fermentation, a Chinese traditional fermented broad bean (Vicia faba L.) paste. Food Chem. 2017, 218, 534–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liang, H.; Chen, H.; Zhang, W.; Yu, C.; Ji, C.; Lin, X. Investigation on microbial diversity of industrial Zhacai paocai during fermentation using high-throughput sequencing and their functional characterization. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 91, 460–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liang, T.; Xie, X.; Ma, J.; Wu, L.; Xi, Y.; Zhao, H.; Li, L.; Li, H.; Feng, Y.; Xue, L.; et al. Microbial communities and physicochemical characteristics of traditional dajiang and sufu in North China revealed by high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 665243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ma, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Yin, L.; Wang, J.; Li, L. Effects of processing and NaCl on angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory activity and γ-aminobutyric acid content during sufu manufacturing. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2013, 6, 1782–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xu, D.; Wang, P.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, J.; Sun, Y.; Gao, L.; Wang, W. High-throughput sequencing approach to characterize dynamic changes of the fungal and bacterial communities during the production of sufu, a traditional Chinese fermented soybean food. Food Microbiol. 2020, 86, 103340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Han, B.Z.; Wang, J.H.; Rombouts, F.M.; Nout, M.R. Effect of NaCl on textural changes and protein and lipid degradation during the ripening stage of sufu, a Chinese fermented soybean food. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2003, 83, 899–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wójcik, W.; Łukasiewicz, M.; Puppel, K. Biogenic amines: Formation, action and toxicity—A review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 2634–2640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ). Scientific opinion on risk based control of biogenic amine formation in fermented foods. EFSA J. 2011, 9, 2393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. ten Brink, B.; Damink, C.; Joosten, H.M.L.J.; Huis in’t Veld, J.H.J. Occurrence and formation of biologically active amines in foods. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1990, 11, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hao, Y.; Sun, B. Analysis of bacterial diversity and biogenic amines content during fermentation of farmhouse sauce from Northeast China. Food Control 2020, 108, 106861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gao, X.; Li, C.; He, R.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, B.; Zhang, Z.H.; Ho, C.T. Research advances on biogenic amines in traditional fermented foods: Emphasis on formation mechanism, detection and control methods. Food Chem. 2023, 405, 134911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Freudenberg, R.A.; Wittemeier, L.; Einhaus, A.; Baier, T.; Kruse, O. Advanced pathway engineering for phototrophic putrescine production. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2022, 20, 1968–1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sang, X.; Li, K.; Zhu, Y.; Ma, X.; Hao, H.; Bi, J.; Zhang, G.; Hou, H. The impact of microbial diversity on biogenic amines formation in grasshopper sub shrimp paste during the fermentation. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Aymerich, T.; Martín, B.; Garriga, M.; Vidal-Carou, M.C.; Bover-Cid, S.; Hugas, M. Safety properties and molecular strain typing of lactic acid bacteria from slightly fermented sausages. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 100, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Production process and sampling points for gray sufu. Pehtze (pe) was produced by inoculating tofu (tofu) with Actinomucor for 24 h and then salting for 2 days to achieve salted pehtze (spe). Then, the salted pehtze was ripened for 1 (d1), 3 (d3), 7 (d7), 14 (d14), 21 (d21), and 35 (d35) days.
Figure 1. Production process and sampling points for gray sufu. Pehtze (pe) was produced by inoculating tofu (tofu) with Actinomucor for 24 h and then salting for 2 days to achieve salted pehtze (spe). Then, the salted pehtze was ripened for 1 (d1), 3 (d3), 7 (d7), 14 (d14), 21 (d21), and 35 (d35) days.
Foods 12 02767 g001
Figure 2. Bacterial composition in the gray sufu samples during fermentation. Data portray (A) phylum and (B) genus level of 16S rRNA gene sequences. For each sample, three repeats were performed, and the mean relative abundance was calculated. Phylum or genus with an abundance percentage of less than 1% were grouped together.
Figure 2. Bacterial composition in the gray sufu samples during fermentation. Data portray (A) phylum and (B) genus level of 16S rRNA gene sequences. For each sample, three repeats were performed, and the mean relative abundance was calculated. Phylum or genus with an abundance percentage of less than 1% were grouped together.
Foods 12 02767 g002
Figure 3. Fungal composition in the gray sufu samples during fermentation. Data portray (A) phylum and (B) genus level of ITS gene sequences. For each sample, three repeats were performed, and the mean relative abundance was calculated. Phylum or genus with an abundance percentage of less than 1% were grouped together.
Figure 3. Fungal composition in the gray sufu samples during fermentation. Data portray (A) phylum and (B) genus level of ITS gene sequences. For each sample, three repeats were performed, and the mean relative abundance was calculated. Phylum or genus with an abundance percentage of less than 1% were grouped together.
Foods 12 02767 g003
Figure 4. The alterations in total acid and pH (A), amino nitrogen and soluble protein (B), as well as moisture content and salinity (C) during sufu fermentation. The data are presented as means ± SD (n = 3). pe: pehtze; spe: salted pehtze; d1, d3, d7, d14, d21, and d35: the ripening time of sufu samples.
Figure 4. The alterations in total acid and pH (A), amino nitrogen and soluble protein (B), as well as moisture content and salinity (C) during sufu fermentation. The data are presented as means ± SD (n = 3). pe: pehtze; spe: salted pehtze; d1, d3, d7, d14, d21, and d35: the ripening time of sufu samples.
Foods 12 02767 g004
Figure 5. The variations in histamine (His), phenylethylamine (Phe), cadaverine (Cad), putrescine (Put), and tyramine (Tyr) during the sufu fermentation. pe: pehtze; spe: salted pehtze; d1, d3, d7, d14, d21, and d35: the ripening time of sufu samples.
Figure 5. The variations in histamine (His), phenylethylamine (Phe), cadaverine (Cad), putrescine (Put), and tyramine (Tyr) during the sufu fermentation. pe: pehtze; spe: salted pehtze; d1, d3, d7, d14, d21, and d35: the ripening time of sufu samples.
Foods 12 02767 g005
Figure 6. The alterations in glutamate (A), arginine (B), lysine (C), histidine (D), tyrosine (E), and phenylalanine (F) throughout the entire fermentation period of gray sufu. The data are presented as three replicates and the mean value. ns: no significance; *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001; ****: p < 0.0001. pe: pehtze; spe: salted pehtze; d1, d3, d7, d14, d21, and d35: the ripening time of sufu samples.
Figure 6. The alterations in glutamate (A), arginine (B), lysine (C), histidine (D), tyrosine (E), and phenylalanine (F) throughout the entire fermentation period of gray sufu. The data are presented as three replicates and the mean value. ns: no significance; *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001; ****: p < 0.0001. pe: pehtze; spe: salted pehtze; d1, d3, d7, d14, d21, and d35: the ripening time of sufu samples.
Foods 12 02767 g006
Figure 7. The redundancy analysis between bacterial (A), fungal (B) genera, and physicochemical properties was performed. Blue arrows indicate different microorganism genera, and red arrows indicate physicochemical properties. SA: salinity; TA: total acid; MC: moisture content; AN: amino nitrogen; SP: soluble protein.
Figure 7. The redundancy analysis between bacterial (A), fungal (B) genera, and physicochemical properties was performed. Blue arrows indicate different microorganism genera, and red arrows indicate physicochemical properties. SA: salinity; TA: total acid; MC: moisture content; AN: amino nitrogen; SP: soluble protein.
Foods 12 02767 g007
Figure 8. The correlation between microbial community and BAs in different fermentation times. (A) bacterial community and (B) fungal community. *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001.
Figure 8. The correlation between microbial community and BAs in different fermentation times. (A) bacterial community and (B) fungal community. *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001.
Foods 12 02767 g008aFoods 12 02767 g008b
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, L.; Liu, Y.; Xu, Q.; Yu, Y.; Zheng, G.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, X.; Zhang, N.; Chu, J.; et al. Microbial Community Succession and Its Correlation with Quality Characteristics during Gray Sufu Fermentation. Foods 2023, 12, 2767. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12142767

AMA Style

Zhao L, Liu Y, Xu Q, Yu Y, Zheng G, Wang Y, Zhang Q, Xu X, Zhang N, Chu J, et al. Microbial Community Succession and Its Correlation with Quality Characteristics during Gray Sufu Fermentation. Foods. 2023; 12(14):2767. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12142767

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Lei, Yang Liu, Qiong Xu, Yi Yu, Guojian Zheng, Yue Wang, Qingping Zhang, Xiaoqian Xu, Nana Zhang, Jiayue Chu, and et al. 2023. "Microbial Community Succession and Its Correlation with Quality Characteristics during Gray Sufu Fermentation" Foods 12, no. 14: 2767. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12142767

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop