Next Article in Journal
Carotenoid Profiling of Yellow-Flesh Peach Fruit
Previous Article in Journal
Eggplant Flour Addition in Cookie: Nutritional Enrichment Alternative for Children
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 11
Issue 12
10.3390/foods11121668
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Consumption of a Gelatin Supplemented with the Probiotic Strain Limosilactobacillus fermentum UCO-979C Prevents Helicobacter pylori Infection in a Young Adult Population Achieved

by
Cristian Parra-Sepúlveda
1,
Kimberly Sánchez-Alonzo
1,
Joaquín Olivares-Muñoz
1,
Cristian Gutiérrez-Zamorano
1,
Carlos T. Smith
1,
Romina I. Carvajal
1,
Katia Sáez-Carrillo
2,
Carlos González
1 and
Apolinaria García-Cancino
1,*
1
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción 4070386, Chile
2
Department of Statistics, Faculty of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción 4070386, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2022, 11(12), 1668; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11121668
Submission received: 17 April 2022 / Revised: 20 May 2022 / Accepted: 28 May 2022 / Published: 7 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Probiotics, Prebiotics and Postbiotics in Human Health)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Helicobacter pylori is a bacterium associated with various gastrointestinal diseases of high worldwide prevalence. Since probiotics are an emerging alternative to managing infection by this pathogenic bacterium, the present work evaluated, in a randomized double-blind study controlled by a placebo, if consuming Limosilactobacillus fermentum UCO-979C prevents H. pylori infection in humans. Participants consumed either L. fermentum UCO-979C-supplemented gelatin (67 participants) or placebo-supplemented gelatin (64 participants) once a day, five days per week for 12 weeks. H. pylori infection in the participants was controlled before and after the intervention detecting H. pylori antigens in stools. Regarding H. pylori-infected participants before the study, 100% remained infected at the end of the study in the placebo group, while 96.7% of those receiving the probiotic remained infected after the intervention. Most importantly, of the non-infected participants, 34.2% became infected and 65.8% remained non-infected in the placebo group, while 2.7% became infected and 97.3% remained as non-infected individuals in the intervened group. Therefore, consuming the L. fermentum UCO-979C strain significantly reduced H. pylori infection, demonstrating a 92.6% efficacy in avoiding infection by this pathogen in non-infected individuals; thus, this probiotic is an excellent candidate to prevent H. pylori infections in non-infected individuals.

1. Introduction

Helicobacter pylori is a Gram-negative bacterium with the ability to colonize the stomach wall and other structures of the host [1]. This infection is associated with the development of clinical illnesses, such as chronic gastritis, peptic ulcers, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma and gastric cancer [2]. It is estimated that infection by this pathogen affects nearly 50% of the global population [3,4]. Nevertheless, its prevalence varies according to geographical areas, it being higher in less developed countries [3]. Several studies have reported that the prevalence of H. pylori infection in Chile reaches approximately 73% in adults, and that it varies between 18% and 34% in pediatric patients [4,5,6]. Therefore, effective therapy is required to contribute to reducing these figures worldwide. For a long time, the first line of action against this pathogen has been triple therapy, including a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), clarithromycin and amoxicillin or metronidazole. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of this treatment has been markedly reduced during the last decade, with variations depending on the reported antibiotic resistance of the pathogen in different geographical regions [7]. The increased resistance of H. pylori to antimicrobials and the secondary effects associated with the antibiotics used to eliminate infection by this pathogen are the most important factors explaining the reduction in time of the efficacy of the anti-H. pylori treatments [8]. Therefore, it is necessary to search for innovative strategies to both treat and/or prevent infection by H. pylori, such as probiotics, live microorganisms which when administered in adequate concentrations confer a health benefit to the host based on their already reported benefits and solid evidence and other possible candidates to be used as anti-H. pylori alternatives [9].
However, to be probiotics, bacterial strains must be supported by clinical studies demonstrating their beneficial effects on the well-being of the hosts [10]. Diverse beneficial attributes of probiotics have been reported, including those having the potential to be used in clinical practice, such as nutritional probiotics, probiotic medications and probiotic foods of medical or common use [10]. Functional foods, mainly those including probiotics in their composition, are nowadays relevant due to their advantages which, associated with the permanent search to improve quality of life, prompt consumers to increase the demand for foods benefiting their organisms [11,12]. Presently, the market offers a large variety of dairy matrix-based functional foods with a diverse probiotic content [13,14]. Nevertheless, they might represent a disadvantage for persons unable to consume lactose. For this reason, in the present work, we evaluated a different type of matrix, gelatin, which has the advantage of lacking lactose, thus, extending the benefit of consuming a probiotic to a larger population. Gelatin is highly valued in the food industry due to its nutritious properties, its nearly 90% content of proteins, mainly collagen, absence of cholesterol and its functional properties, including water trapping [15]. Moreover, its low cost is within the reach of most of the population [16]. Considering its technological and functional properties, gelatin is extensively used in the industry to produce edible coatings which provide protection and stability to foods [17]. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that the encapsulation of probiotic bacteria in gelatin matrices improves their viability and protects them, improving the stability of probiotics in foods [18,19,20].
Our research group conducted a detailed characterization of the probiotic properties and the anti-H. pylori activity of the Limosilactobacillus fermentum UCO-979C strain, previously known as Lactobacillus fermentum UCO-979C, a lactic acid bacterium isolated from the human stomach [21,22], demonstrating that this strain is capable of tolerating an acidic pH and bile salts, producing hydrogen peroxide, and that it is highly hydrophobic [23,24]. Moreover, it was observed that this strain is able to efficiently adhere to the gastric mucosa, as shown by its in vitro adherence to gastric carcinoma human cells (AGS) and its in vivo adherence to the gastric mucosa in the Mongolian gerbil model [25]. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that L. fermentum UCO-979C strongly inhibits the adhesion, growth and the urease activity of H. pylori and that it improves resistance against infection by this pathogen, modulating the gastric innate immune response [26]. Previous results in humans also indicated that consuming the strain L. fermentum UCO-979C significantly improved healthy feeding habits and also increased the lean mass in the group consuming this probiotic [27]. Therefore, the present study corresponds to a final experimental stage to demonstrate both the effectivity and innocuity of the probiotic strain L. fermentum UCO-979C. Hence, the aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of administering gelatin supplemented with the probiotic strain L. fermentum UCO-979C on the H. pylori infection in asymptomatic Chilean young adults.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Design and Supervision

This research was a randomized double-blind study controlled by placebo to evaluate a treatment against H. pylori by administering the probiotic strain L. fermentum UCO-979C in gelatin. This study was approved and assigned the code CEBB 225-2018 by the Committee of Ethics, Bioethics and Biosafety, Vice-rectory of Research and Development, University of Concepcion, Concepcion, Chile. This assay was carried out in accordance with the indications of the Declaration of Helsinki [28].
The authors attest to the accuracy and integrity of the data collected and the strict observance of the protocol while performing the present study. This study was financed by the INNOVA call, Chilean Economic Development Agency (CORFO), Chile, and funds of the Laboratory of Bacterial Pathogenicity, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Concepción, Concepcion, Chile. The gelatin biomass and the placebo were supplied by the Laboratory of Bioprocesses, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Concepcion, but it had no other participation in this study. The researchers had full autonomy to design and carry out this study and to prepare the manuscript.

2.2. Eligibility and Recruiting of Participants

One hundred and thirty-one University of Concepción (Chile) students were recruited to participate in this study. Invitations to participate were sent by e-mail or communicated at lecture halls. Invitations were issued between March and May 2018. The criteria for eligibility included being a University of Concepción (Concepción, Chile) student not consuming probiotics, prebiotics or medications for one month prior to the beginning of the study. Selection criteria also included being between 18 and 30 years old because this was the age group showing a progressive increase in H. pylori infection [5]. Criteria for exclusion from the study included pathological conditions, pregnancy, breastfeeding or severe depression. Students planning to become pregnant during the first 8 weeks of the study or considering surgery or other medical intervention were also excluded from the study. Qualified members of our research team explained the study to each candidate participating in this study and obtained written informed consent from each one of them.

2.3. Procedures

It was determined that this study required at least 131 participants. This size of samples considered up to a 10% desertion of participants and 10% of eliminated participants due to their unfulfillment of the rules. As shown in Figure 1, 131 participants (79 women and 52 men) were randomly divided into two groups. The intervened group included 67 participants that received the probiotic strain L. fermentum UCO-979C in the gelatin, while the control group included 64 participants that received the same gelatin in which the probiotic was replaced by a placebo. Each participant received 5 servings of gelatin per week, and they were instructed to keep them refrigerated.

2.4. Culture of the Probiotic Bacterial Strain, Production of the Probiotic Biomass and Preparation of Gelatin

L. fermentum UCO-979C was a bacterial strain obtained from a human gastric biopsy and was maintained at the culture collection of the Laboratory of Bacterial Pathogenicity, Department of Microbiology, University of Concepcion, Chile. The strain was cultured in Mann–Rogosa–Sharpe (MRS) broth (Difco, Wokingham, UK) under microaerobic conditions at 37 °C for 24 h. Then, an inoculum was transferred to MRS broth (BD Difco, Sparks, MD, USA) and incubated under the same atmospheric conditions for a further 24 to 48 h. The probiotic biomass of L. fermentum UCO-979C required to formulate the gelatin was prepared in a culture medium (patent number 1940–2005, Instituto Nacional de Propiedad Industrial (INAPI), Santiago, Chile) containing whey cheese, lactase, casein peptone and yeast extract with a pH of 6.8. The culture was kept under aerobic conditions at 37 °C in a 15 L fermenter. The biomass obtained was resuspended in 20% skim milk, frozen at −45 °C, lyophilized using a model BK-FD10PT freeze dryer (Biobase, Shandong, China) and kept at 4 °C in the dark until used. Counts indicated the presence of 1010 CFU g−1 of lyophilized powder [29]. Regarding the preparation of the gelatins, the probiotic strain L. fermentum UCO-979C, >107 colony-forming units (CFUs) mL−1, was incorporated into three-layer gelatin (100 g serving) (Figure 2). The top and bottom layers consisted of flavored gelatin without saccharose, while the middle layer, containing the probiotic, was prepared with unflavored gelatin without saccharose. The placebo gelatin was identical to the probiotic gelatin in flavor and texture, except that it did not contain the probiotic strain, which was replaced by 2% skim milk. Gelatins were prepared weekly and random samples were analyzed by plate count to confirm that the probiotic strain counts were >107 CFU mL−1. Plate counts were performed on MRS agar (Difco, Wokingham, UK) under microaerobic conditions at 37 °C for 24 h.

2.5. Data Collection

The demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants were evaluated before starting and after the end of the 12 weeks of the study. Age in years, gender (woman, man) and pathologies such as irritable bowel, diabetes, lupus, gastroesophageal reflux, gastritis, lactose intolerance, alcohol consumption, asthma and allergies were evaluated. Each participant was requested, before starting and after the end of the study, to provide a fecal sample to detect H. pylori using the Premier Platinum HpSA Plus Kit (Meridian Bioscience Europe, Italy), which detects H. pylori antigens in stools. This assay allowed the detection of H. pylori-infected participants before starting the assay to evaluate the effect of consuming the probiotic gelatin for 12 weeks on H. pylori-infected and non-infected individuals.
The primary efficacy of probiotic gelatin or placebo was concluded, evaluating the manifestations of adverse effects during the intervention period. An adverse event was defined as any event or reaction, independently of its causality, requiring hospitalization or considered as an important medical event, such as taste disturbance, diarrhea, abdominal pain, constipation, abdominal distension, nausea or vomiting. Basal demographic data of the participants were also collected and the participants were considered to comply with the instructions when they consumed more than 80% of the gelatins they received. Data were evaluated weekly by means of telephone interviews, performed by qualified researchers, or by means of questionnaires uploaded to a database. The unmasking of the assay was performed at the end of the analysis of the data.
To obtain the secondary efficiency results of the intervention in the participants consuming the probiotic gelatin or the placebo, the difference in the risk to acquire the H. pylori infection was calculated. It was calculated as indicated by Doll and Hill [30]:
Risk among non-intervened group-Risk among intervened group
Risk among non-intervened group

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS software version 24.0 (IBM Company, Armonk, NY, USA). Analyses were conducted independently. Results were considered as statistically significant when the value of p was <0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Recruiting and Participants

A total of 182 students enrolled to participate in the study. From this total, 51 were excluded because they did not fulfill all the required criteria to be included. The remaining 131 students selected to participate were distributed by simple randomization into two groups, one receiving the probiotic-supplemented gelatin and the other receiving the placebo gelatin. Among the 131 recruited participants, 67 received the probiotic and 64 received the placebo. None of the 131 participants were eliminated from the study due to the loss of tracking or nonfulfillment problems during the study. Figure 1 shows the CONSORT flow diagram of recruitment and the analysis of the participants.

3.2. Evaluation of Participants

Table 1 shows the demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants recruited for the study. Age, alcohol consumption and comorbidities were similar between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the age of the participants. With respect to gender, women were dominant in both groups. Regarding diseases, no significant differences were detected when both groups were compared. During the 12 weeks of the intervention period, none of the participants reported adverse effects, suffered an infection or required the administration of antibiotics.

3.3. Viability of the Probiotic in the Gelatin

The counts of the probiotic in random servings of probiotic gelatin demonstrated that the concentration of L. fermentum UCO-979C was always above >107 CFU mL−1 up to the third week after preparation of the gelatin. After four weeks, the concentration decreased by one logarithm (data not shown). It must be taken into consideration that the gelatins were prepared and distributed weekly; therefore, participants consumed the here reported concentrations of the probiotic.

3.4. Detection of H. pylori Using an Immunoassay in Stools before and after Consuming the Probiotic

Table 2 shows that there were no significant differences (p > 0.9999) between the two groups when comparing the number of H. pylori-infected participants before and after the probiotic treatment. The infected participants of the placebo group remained infected until the end of the assay (26/26), while from the participants of the intervened group, 29/30 remained infected post-intervention and 1/30 showed no H. pylori infection. On the other hand, there was a significant difference (p = 0.0005) when the participants not infected with H. pylori were analyzed before and after the intervention. Among the participants of the placebo group, 13/38 became infected during the time span of the assay and 25/38 remained as non-infected, while in the group which consumed the gelatin supplemented with probiotic, only 1/37 participants became infected and 36/37 remained as non-infected. This information allowed us to determine that the prevalence of H. pylori infection was 42.7%. Furthermore, according to the results, the estimated efficacy of the probiotic L. fermentum UCO-979C to prevent H. pylori infection was 92.6% in Chilean young adults (18 to 30 years old).
Figure 3A shows that, in accordance with the results of the detection of H. pylori antigens in their stools, the participants infected before the beginning of the intervention who received the placebo remained infected by the pathogenic bacterium H. pylori in 100% of the cases. With respect to the group receiving the probiotic gelatin, the infection persisted in most of the participants (96.7%) and only in 3.3% was the infection no longer present after the intervention. Figure 3B represents the H. pylori non-infected participants before consuming the probiotic gelatin or placebo, showing that among the participants who consumed the placebo, 34.2% became infected, while 65.8% remained non-infected, and of the participants receiving the probiotic, 2.7% became infected, while 97.3% remained free of the infection.
All the 131 participants consumed more than 80% of the probiotic or placebo gelatin scheduled doses. None of the participants in this study showed any adverse effect or important medical events.

4. Discussion

Between 15% and 20% of the individuals infected with H. pylori develop a benign or malignant gastroduodenal pathology associated with the chronic inflammation caused by this bacterium [31]. These pathologies include, among others, peptic ulcer, MALT lymphoma and gastric cancer. The high prevalence of H. pylori at young ages has been associated with a high gastric cancer mortality rate in the Chilean population [5].
The eradication of H. pylori is associated with the healing of ulcers, regression of MALT lymphoma and a reduced risk of cancer [32]. Therefore, the importance of the eradication of this bacterium cannot be overemphasized [33]. Presently, the antibiotic treatment of infection by H. pylori is mandatory to prevent severe diseases; nevertheless, failures of the eradication therapy, particularly in the case of clarithromycin, have been observed worldwide [34,35]. In this respect, a study by our group indicated that clinical H. pylori isolates obtained in the Bio Bio region (Chile) from 2015 to 2017 were still highly sensitive to amoxicillin and tetracycline, but the resistance frequencies to clarithromycin (29.2%) and levofloxacin (20.8%) [36] suggested that the conventional triple therapy and therapeutic alternatives may not be effective in the Bio Bio region. A number of therapeutical alternatives have been investigated to prevent or to treat H. pylori infection [37]. Although vaccination must be highlighted as a preventive alternative, thus far, there is no vaccine available at the worldwide level to prevent infections by this bacterium. Considering the diversity of the immune response of individuals and the characteristics of H. pylori infection (large genetic heterogeneity of strains), there is still a long way to obtain an effective vaccine [38,39].
Probiotics, live microorganisms which when consumed in appropriate quantities confer beneficial effects on the health of the host beyond their primary nutritional effect [40,41], have been used to treat a number of diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome and diarrhea [42,43]. Aiba and coworkers demonstrated, for the first time, that Lactobacillus acidophilus inhibited the growth of H. pylori in vitro [44]. Furthermore, they indicated that the mechanism could be related to reduced urease activity mediated by the short-chain fatty acids produced by the probiotic, an improvement of the acidic environment of the stomach, damage to the cell wall of H. pylori or the inhibition of the colonization of the gastric mucosa by H. pylori [45,46,47].
Considering the antibiotic resistance shown by numerous bacteria, including H. pylori, probiotics appear as a very good preventive alternative [48]. The strain L. fermentum UCO-979C, isolated and characterized by our group, showed to possess good probiotic functional properties and to be innocuous [24,49,50]. Considering its characteristics and beneficial properties, this strain was used to prepare a probiotic gelatin, which was administered to young Chilean university students. This population was selected based on a study performed in Chile by Ferreccio and coworkers [5], who reported that gastric adenocarcinoma and a high H. pylori prevalence at early ages were some of the main causes of cancer-related mortalities in the country.
Carrion et al. [21] reported no adverse effects in the first human study using the strain L. fermentum UCO-979C. Our study showed that the probiotic strain L. fermentum UCO-979C consumed for 12 weeks was safe and that it did not produce diarrhea or gastrointestinal malaise. Therefore, this was the second local study providing evidence that the L. fermentum UCO-979C strain is safe to be consumed by humans. The present study, a double-blind assay controlled by placebo, demonstrated that the strain L. fermentum UCO-979C provided a statistically significant (p = 0.0005) prophylactic effect, preventing infection with H. pylori in those participants which at the beginning of the study were free of infection with this bacterium and consumed the probiotic gelatin for 12 weeks. Random gelatin servings were used to evaluate, once a week for four weeks, the number of viable CFU mL−1 of the probiotic in the gelatin matrix. The results demonstrated that the concentration of the L. fermentum UCO-979C strain was >107 CFU mL−1 for three weeks, and that it decreased by one logarithm in the fourth week. Since the gelatin servings were prepared and distributed on a weekly basis, the participants of the intervened group always received gelatins containing >107 viable CFU mL−1. Some studies have shown a direct relationship between the addition of potential probiotic strains and the in vitro inhibition of H. pylori growth [51]. The L. acidophilus [52] and Lactobacillus casei Shirota strains [53] have an antagonistic effect on H. pylori. Several reports describe probiotic strains with anti-H. pylori activity being mediated by the production of antimicrobial compounds, such as bacteriocins, autolysins and organic acids [54,55]. With respect to the present work, the prophylactic effect on infection by H. pylori could be due to the production of lactic acid by the L. fermentum UCO-979C strain [50], which reduces the pH and, therefore, reduces the activity of the H. pylori urease enzyme, causing an antimicrobial effect [50]. This effect has also been reported in Lactobacillus salivarius, L. acidophilus, Lactobacillus rhamnosus and L. casei Shirota strains, both in in vitro and in animal studies [56].
The prophylactic effect described in the present study seems to be specific for this particular strain [52,57,58]. Since L. fermentum UCO-979C is a good biofilm-forming bacterium, it may help to protect the gastric epithelium from the colonization of H. pylori [21]. The prophylactic effect of L. fermentum UCO-979C was already described by Merino et al. in an in vivo model [25], demonstrating that Mongolian gerbils which previously received the probiotic L. fermentum UCO-979C strain showed reduced colonization by H. pylori in the stomach antrum (87% reduction, p = 0.004) and stomach body (77% reduction, p = 0.0476). To the best of our knowledge, the prophylactic activity of the strain L. fermentum UCO-979C against H. pylori has been also previously reported for other lactobacilli [52,58].
The participants who, based on the detection of H. pylori in their stools, showed to be positive for the pathogen at the beginning of the study, showed no significant differences at the end of the administration of the probiotic gelatin or of the placebo. Several clinical assays using single probiotic strains or combinations of them administered to treat H. pylori infection differed in their results or showed no effect [59,60,61], while others showed eradication of the infection in some patients [62,63,64]. It has also been observed that the treatment with probiotics alleviates the symptoms of H. pylori-caused gastritis and reduces the colonization by this pathogenic bacterium. As might be expected, thus far, there are no reports of the complete eradication of H. pylori infection by the administration of a single probiotic [65]. Nevertheless, it has been demonstrated that complementary treatments with probiotics benefit infected persons by decreasing the harmful effects of antibiotics used to eradicate H. pylori [8]. The long-term administration of probiotics might have positive results in H. pylori infection, particularly in reducing the risk to develop diseases caused by the high levels of gastric inflammation [65]. Moreover, the results of the present work confirm previous results reported for this probiotic strain [21,22,26,50,66,67], which may even be considered as a potential immunobiotic capable of reducing the adhesion of H. pylori to the gastric mucosa and the inflammatory damage caused by this pathogen, modulating the immune responses at the intestinal mucosa and systemic levels [22].

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this clinical assay confirmed the prophylactic effect of the probiotic strain L. fermentum UCO-979C, administered in gelatin, against infection by H. pylori, having a 92.6% efficacy in avoiding infection by this pathogen in non-infected individuals. Additionally, it allowed us to collect, for the first time, important data about our region on H. pylori infection in the 18–30-year-old population, which showed a 42.7% prevalence.

6. Patents

The invention patent was granted by INAPI, Chile. “Lactobacillus Fermentum Rgm 2341 Strain and Its Use in the Prevention and Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection”. Registration number: 63992.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.P.-S., C.G. and A.G.-C.; methodology, C.P.-S., K.S.-A., J.O.-M., C.G.-Z. and A.G.-C.; validation, C.P.-S., K.S.-A., C.G. and K.S.-C.; formal analysis, C.P.-S., K.S.-C. and A.G.-C.; investigation, C.P.-S., K.S.-A., J.O.-M. and C.G.-Z.; resources, A.G.-C. and C.G.; data curation, C.P.-S., J.O.-M. and K.S.-C.; writing—original draft preparation, C.P.-S., J.O.-M., K.S.-A., C.G. and A.G.-C.; writing—review and editing, C.P.-S., K.S.-A., J.O.-M., C.T.S., R.I.C., C.G. and A.G.-C.; visualization, C.P.-S., K.S.-A., J.O.-M., C.G.-Z., C.T.S., R.I.C., K.S.-C., C.G. and A.G.-C.; supervision, C.P.-S., J.O.-M. and A.G.-C.; project administration, C.P.-S., C.G.-Z., C.G. and A.G.-C.; funding acquisition, A.G.-C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by project CORFO 14IDL2-29744 of Innova Chile (Chile).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved and assigned the code CEBB 225-2018 by the Committee of Ethics, Bioethics and Biosafety, Vice-rectory of Research and Development, University of Concepcion, Concepcion, Chile.

Informed Consent Statement

All the project participants in this study signed an informed consent form prior to being accepted to participate in it.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The collaboration of the Laboratory of Bioprocesses, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Concepcion, is acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abdel-Razik, A.; Mousa, N.; Shabana, W.; Refaey, M.; Elhelaly, R.; Elzehery, R.; Abdelsalam, M.; Elgamal, A.; Nassar, M.R.; Abu El-Soud, A.; et al. Helicobacter pylori and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A New Enigma? Helicobacter 2018, 23, e12537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Shrivastava, S.R.; Shrivastava, P.S.; Ramasamy, J. World Health Organization Releases Global Priority List of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria to Guide Research, Discovery, and Development of New Antibiotics. JMS J. Med. Soc. 2018, 32, 76–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Csendes, A.; Figueroa, M. Situación Del Cáncer Gástrico En El Mundo y En Chile. Rev. Chil. Cir. 2017, 69, 502–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Hunt, R.H.; Xiao, S.D.; Megraud, F.; Leon-Barua, R.; Bazzoli, F.; Van der Merwe, S.; Krabshuis, J.H. Guías Prácticas de La Organización Mundial de Gastroenterología (WGO): Helicobacter pylori En Los Países En Desarrollo. Gastroenterol. Lat. 2010, 21, 165–181. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ferreccio, C.; Rollán, A.; Harris, P.R.; Serrano, C.; Gederlini, A.; Margozzini, P.; Gonzalez, C.; Aguilera, X.; Venegas, A.; Jara, A. Gastric Cancer Is Related to Early Helicobacter pylori Infection in a High-Prevalence Country. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2007, 16, 662–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Jaime, F.; Villagrán, A.; Serrano, C.; Cerda, J.; Harris, P.R. Frequency of Helicobacter pylori Infection in 144 School Age Chilean Children. Rev. Med. Chil. 2013, 141, 1249–12454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Rollan, A.; Arab, J.P.; Camargo, M.C.; Candia, R.; Harris, P.; Ferreccio, C.; Rabkin, C.S.; Gana, J.C.; Cortés, P.; Herrero, R.; et al. Management of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Latin America: A Delphi Technique-Based Consensus. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 10969–10983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Guevara, B.; Cogdill, A.G. Helicobacter pylori: A Review of Current Diagnostic and Management Strategies. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2020, 65, 1917–1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nutrition Division. Health and Nutritional Properties of Probiotics in Food Including Powder Milk with Live Lactic Acid Bacteria-Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation. FAO/WHO. 2006. Available online: https://www.fao.org/publications/card/es/c/7c102d95-2fd5-5b22-8faf-f0b2e68dfbb6/ (accessed on 15 May 2022).
  10. Hill, C.; Guarner, F.; Reid, G.; Gibson, G.R.; Merenstein, D.J.; Pot, B.; Morelli, L.; Canani, R.B.; Flint, H.J.; Salminen, S.; et al. Expert Consensus Document: The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics Consensus Statement on the Scope and Appropriate Use of the Term Probiotic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014, 11, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Küster-Boluda, I.; Vidal-Capilla, I. Consumer Attitudes in the Election of Functional Foods. Span. J. Mark. ESIC 2017, 21, 65–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Majeed, M.; Nagabhushanam, K.; Natarajan, S.; Sivakumar, A.; Ali, F.; Pande, A.; Majeed, S.; Karri, S.K. Bacillus Coagulans MTCC 5856 Supplementation in the Management of Diarrhea Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Double Blind Randomized Placebo Controlled Pilot Clinical Study. Nutr. J. 2016, 15, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Guarner, F.; Sanders, M.E.; Eliakim, R.; Fedorak, R.; Gangl, A.; Garisch, J.; Kaufmann, P.; Karakan, T.; Khan, A.; Kim, N.; et al. Probióticos y Prebióticos; World Gastroenterology Organisation: Milwaukee, WI, USA, 2017; pp. 1–35. [Google Scholar]
  14. Restrepo, Y.A.R.; Rojas, A.F.; Rodríguez-Barona, S. Encapsulación De Probióticos Para Aplicaciones Alimenticias. Biosalud 2016, 15, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Miranda, J.S.; Costa, B.V.; de Oliveira, I.V.; de Lima, D.C.N.; Martins, E.M.F.; de Castro Leite Júnior, B.R.; Almeida do Nascimento Benevenuto, W.C.; Campelo de Queiroz, I.; Ribeiro da Silva, R.; Martins, M.L. Probiotic Jelly Candies Enriched with Native Atlantic Forest Fruits and Bacillus coagulans GBI-30 6086. LWT 2020, 126, 109275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Alipal, J.; Mohd Pu’ad, N.; Te Chuan, L.; Nayan, N.; Sahari, N.; Basri, H.; Idris, M.; Abdullah, H. A Review of Gelatin: Properties, Sources, Process, Applications, and Commercialisation. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 42, 240–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ramos, M.; Valdés, A.; Beltrán, A.; Garrigós, M.C. Gelatin-Based Films and Coatings for Food Packaging Applications. Coatings 2016, 6, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Abedinia, A.; Alimohammadi, F.; Teymori, F.; Razgardani, N.; Saeidi Asl, M.R.; Ariffin, F.; Mohammadi Nafchi, A.; Huda, N.; Roslan, J. Characterization and Cell Viability of Probiotic/Prebiotics Film Based on Duck Feet Gelatin: A Novel Poultry Gelatin as a Suitable Matrix for Probiotics. Foods 2021, 10, 1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rabaioli Rama, G.; Dall’Agnol, W.; Esquerdo, V.; Lehn, D.; Dullius, D.; Souza, C. Ricotta Whey Supplemented with Gelatin and Collagen for the Encapsulation of Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 41, 576–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Khodaei, D.; Hamidi Esfahani, Z.; Lacroix, M. Gelatin and Low Methoxyl Pectin Films Containing Probiotics: Film Characterization and Cell Viability. Food Biosci. 2020, 36, 100660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Salas-Jara, M.J.; Sanhueza, E.A.; Retamal-Díaz, A.; González, C.; Urrutia, H.; García, A. Probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum UCO-979C Biofilm Formation on AGS and Caco-2 Cells and Helicobacter pylori Inhibition. Biofouling 2016, 32, 1245–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Garcia-Castillo, V.; Komatsu, R.; Clua, P.; Indo, Y.; Takagi, M.; Salva, S.; Islam, M.A.; Alvarez, S.; Takahashi, H.; Garcia-Cancino, A.; et al. Evaluation of the Immunomodulatory Activities of the Probiotic Strain Lactobacillus fermentum UCO-979C. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Valenzuela, M.; Albar, J.P.; Paradela, A.; Toledo, H. Helicobacter pylori Exhibits a Fur-Dependent Acid Tolerance Response. Helicobacter 2011, 16, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. García, C.A.; Henríquez, A.P.; Retamal, R.C.; Pineda, C.S.; Delgado Sen, C.; González, C.C. Propiedades Probióticas de Lactobacillus spp. Aislados de Biopsias Gástricas de Pacientes Con y Sin Infección Por Helicobacter pylori. Rev. Med. Chil. 2009, 137, 369–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Merino, J.S.; Araneda, L.; Lincoñir-Campos, P.; Parra, C.; Sáez, K.; García, A. Dynamics of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Infants during the First Six Months of Life. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 2019, 37, 109–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Garcia-Castillo, V.; Marcial, G.; Albarracín, L.; Tomokiyo, M.; Clua, P.; Takahashi, H.; Kitazawa, H.; Garcia-Cancino, A.; Villena, J. The Exopolysaccharide of Lactobacillus fermentum UCO-979C Is Partially Involved in Its Immunomodulatory Effect and Its Ability to Improve the Resistance against Helicobacter pylori Infection. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Apablaza, P.C.; Corra, C.M.; Rojas, M.V.; Zamorano, C.G.; Alonso, K.S.; Sepúlveda, C.P.; Carrillo, K.S.; Cancino, A.G. Efecto Del Consumo Del Probiótico Lactobacillus fermentum UCO-979C En Peso, Masa Grasa, Masa Magra, Circunferencia de La Cintura y Hábitos Alimenticios Introducción Las Bacterias Gástricas Comensales Más Material y Métodos Ciento Ochenta y Dos Estudian. Span. J. Community Nutr. 2021, 27, 49–54. [Google Scholar]
  28. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013, 310, 2191–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Paucar-Carrión, C.; Espinoza-Monje, M.; Gutiérrez-Zamorano, C.; Sánchez-Alonzo, K.; Carvajal, R.I.; Rogel-Castillo, C.; Sáez-Carrillo, K.; García-Cancino, A. Incorporation of Limosilactobacillus fermentum UCO-979C with Anti-Helicobacter pylori and Immunomodulatory Activities in Various Ice Cream Bases. Foods 2022, 11, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Doll, R.; Hill, A.B. Smoking and Carcinoma of the Lung; Preliminary Report. Br. Med. J. 1950, 2, 739–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Sachs, G.; Scott, D.R. Helicobacter pylori: Eradication or Preservation. F1000 Med. Rep. 2012, 4, 2–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Camargo, M.C.; García, A.; Riquelme, A.; Camargo, C.A.; Hernandez-García, T.; Candia, R.; Bruce, M.G.; Rabkin, C.S. The Problem of Helicobacter pylori Resistance to Antibiotics: A Systematic Review in Latin America. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 109, 485–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Malfertheiner, P.; Megraud, F.; O’Morain, C.; Gisbert, J.P.; Kuipers, E.J.; Axon, A.; Bazzoli, F.; Gasbarrini, A.; Atherton, J.; Graham, D.Y.; et al. Management of Helicobacter pylori Infection-the Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report. Gut 2017, 66, 6–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Savoldl, A.; Carrara, E.; Graham, D.; Conti, M.; Tacconelli, E. Prevalence of Antibiotic Resistance in Helicobcater pylori: Revisón Sistemática y Metaanálisis En Las Regiones de La OMS. Gastroenterology 2018, 155, 1372–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Malfertheiner, P.; Megraud, F.; O’Morain, C.A.; Gisbert, J.P.; Kuipers, E.J.; Axon, A.T.; Bazzoli, F.; Gasbarrini, A.; Atherton, J.; Graham, D.Y.; et al. Management of Helicobacter pylori Infection—The Maastricht IV/ Florence Consensus Report. Gut 2012, 61, 646–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Parra-Sepúlveda, C.; Merino, J.S.; Sáez-Carrillo, K.; González, C.; García-Cancino, A. Antibiotic Resistance Surveillance of Helicobacter pylori at the Biobío Region (Chile) in a Decade. Arq. Gastroenterol. 2019, 56, 361–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ayala, G.; Escobedo-Hinojosa, W.I.; de La Cruz-Herrera, C.F.; Romero, I. Exploring Alternative Treatments for Helicobacter pylori Infection. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 1450–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sutton, P.; Chionh, Y.T. Why Can’t We Make an Effective Vaccine against Helicobacter pylori? Expert Rev. Vaccines 2013, 12, 433–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Augusto Urrego, J.; Otero, W.; Trespalacios, A. Avances En La Búsqueda de La Vacuna Contra Helicobacter pylori. Rev. Médicas UIS 2017, 30, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Bielecka, M. Probiotics in Food. In Chemical and Functional Properties of Food Components, 3rd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006; pp. 413–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gupta, V.; Garg, R. Probiotics. Indian J. Med. Microbiol. 2009, 27, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Alvarez-Calatayud, G.; Margolles, A. Dual-Coated Lactic Acid Bacteria: An Emerging Innovative Technology in the Field of Probiotics. Future Microbiol. 2016, 11, 467–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Bhatia, S.J.; Kochar, N.; Abraham, P.; Nair, N.G.; Mehta, A.P. Lactobacillus acidophilus Inhibits Growth of Campylobacter pylori in Vitro. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1989, 27, 2328–2330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Aiba, Y.; Ishikawa, H.; Tokunaga, M.; Komatsu, Y. Anti-Helicobacter pylori Activity of Non-Living, Heat-Killed Form of Lactobacilli Including Lactobacillus johnsonii No.1088. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2017, 364, fnx102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Vijayaram, S.; Kannan, S. Probiotics: The Marvelous Factor and Health Benefits. Biomed. Biotechnol. Res. J. BBRJ 2018, 2, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mukai, T.; Asasaka, T.; Sato, E.; Mori, K.; Matsumoto, M.; Ohori, H. Inhibition of Binding of Helicobacter pylori to the Glycolipid Receptors by Probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2002, 32, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Xiaoguang, S.; Junhong, Z.; Lingshan, M.; Jialing, S.; Mengbin, Q.; Xue, H. Efficacy and Safety of Probiotics in Eradicating Helicobacter pylori. Nature 2018, 388, 539–547. [Google Scholar]
  48. McFarland, L.V.; Huang, Y.; Wang, L.; Malfertheiner, P. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Multi-Strain Probiotics as Adjunct Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication and Prevention of Adverse Events. United Eur. Gastroenterol. J. 2016, 4, 546–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. García, A.; Sáez, K.; Delgado, C.; González, C.L. Low Co-Existence Rates of Lactobacillus spp. and Helicobacter pylori Detected in Gastric Biopsies from Patients with Gastrointestinal Symptoms. Rev. Esp. Enferm. Dig. 2012, 104, 473–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. García, A.; Navarro, K.; Sanhueza, E.; Pineda, S.; Pastene, E.; Quezada, M.; Henríquez, K.; Karlyshev, A.; Villena, J.; González, C. Characterization of Lactobacillus fermentum UCO-979C, a Probiotic Strain with a Potent Anti-Helicobacter pylori Activity. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2017, 25, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lorca, G.L.; Wadström, T.; Font de Valdez, G.; Ljungh, Å. Lactobacillus acidophilus Autolysins Inhibit Helicobacter pylori in Vitro. Curr. Microbiol. 2001, 42, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lebeer, S.; Verhoeven, T.L.A.; Vélez, M.P.; Vanderleyden, J.; De Keersmaecker, S.C.J. Impact of Environmental and Genetic Factors on Biofilm Formation by the Probiotic Strain Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 6768–6775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Sgouras, D.N.; Panayotopoulou, E.G.; Martinez-Gonzalez, B.; Petraki, K.; Michopoulos, S.; Mentis, A. Lactobacillus johnsonii La1 Attenuates Helicobacter pylori-Associated Gastritis and Reduces Levels of Proinflammatory Chemokines in C57BL/6 Mice. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 2005, 12, 1378–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Butel, M.J. Probiotics, Gut Microbiota and Health. Med. Mal. Infect. 2014, 44, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Klaenhammer, T.R. Genetics of Bacteriocins Produced by Lactic Acid Bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1993, 12, 39–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ryan, K.A.; O’Hara, A.M.; Van Pijkeren, J.P.; Douillard, F.P.; O’Toole, P.W. Lactobacillus salivarius Modulates Cytokine Induction and Virulence Factor Gene Expression in Helicobacter pylori. J. Med. Microbiol. 2009, 58, 996–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Speranza, B.; Corbo, M.R.; Sinigaglia, M. Effects of Nutritional and Environmental Conditions on Salmonella Sp. Biofilm Formation. J. Food Sci. 2011, 76, 12–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Terraf, M.C.L.; Juárez Tomás, M.S.; Nader-Macías, M.E.F.; Silva, C. Screening of Biofilm Formation by Beneficial Vaginal Lactobacilli and Influence of Culture Media Components. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 113, 1517–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cats, A.; Kuipers, E.J.; Bosschaert, M.A.R.; Pot, R.G.J.; Vandenbroucke-Grauls, C.M.J.E.; Kusters, J.G. Effect of Frequent Consumption of a Lactobacillus casei-Containing Milk Drink in Helicobacter Pylori-Colonized Subjects. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2003, 17, 429–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wendakoon, C.N.; Thomson, A.B.R.; Ozimek, L. Lack of Therapeutic Effect of a Specially Designed Yogurt for the Eradication of Helicobacter pylori Infection. Digestion 2002, 65, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lee, C.Y.; Shih, H.C.; Yu, M.C.; Lee, M.Y.; Chang, Y.L.; Lai, Y.Y.; Lee, Y.C.; Kuan, Y.H.; Lin, C.C. Evaluation of the Potential Inhibitory Activity of a Combination of L. Acidophilus, L. rhamnosus and L. sporogenes on Helicobacter pylori: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 2017, 23, 176–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gotteland, M.; Brunser, O.; Cruchet, S. Systematic Review: Are Probiotics Useful in Controlling Gastric Colonization by Helicobacter pylori? Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2006, 23, 1077–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hauser, G.; Salkic, N.; Vukelic, K.; JajacKnez, A.; Stimac, D. Probiotics for Standard Triple Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Medicine 2015, 94, e685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lu, C.; Sang, J.; He, H.; Wan, X.; Lin, Y.; Li, L.; Li, Y.; Yu, C. Probiotic Supplementation Does Not Improve Eradication Rate of Helicobacter pylori Infection Compared to Placebo Based on Standard Therapy: A Meta-Analysis. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Chakravarty, K.; Gaur, S. Role of Probiotics in Prophylaxis of Helicobacter pylori Infection. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2019, 20, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Gutiérrez-Zamorano, C.; González-Ávila, M.; Díaz-Blas, G.; Smith, C.T.; González-Correa, C.; García-Cancino, A. Increased Anti-Helicobacter pylori Effect of the Probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum UCO-979C Strain Encapsulated in Carrageenan Evaluated in Gastric Simulations under Fasting Conditions. Food Res. Int. 2019, 121, 812–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Merino, J.S.; García, A.; Pastene, E.; Salas, A.; Saez, K.; González, C.L. Lactobacillus fermentum UCO-979C Strongly Inhibited Helicobacter pylori SS1 in Meriones Unguiculatus. Benef. Microbes 2018, 9, 625–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Foods 11 01668 g001 550
Figure 1. CONSORT flow diagram of recruitment and analysis of participants.
Figure 1. CONSORT flow diagram of recruitment and analysis of participants.
Foods 11 01668 g001
Foods 11 01668 g002 550
Figure 2. (A) Three-layer probiotic-supplemented gelatin (right) and three-layer placebo-supplemented gelatin (left), the probiotic was included in the middle layer; (B) refrigerated gelatins in storage to be distributed to the participants.
Figure 2. (A) Three-layer probiotic-supplemented gelatin (right) and three-layer placebo-supplemented gelatin (left), the probiotic was included in the middle layer; (B) refrigerated gelatins in storage to be distributed to the participants.
Foods 11 01668 g002
Foods 11 01668 g003 550
Figure 3. Effect of consuming the probiotic gelatin (100 g serving) containing 107 CFU mL−1 L. fermentum UCO-979C strain (in 100 g serving) for 12 weeks on the percentage of H. pylori-infected participants at the end of the intervention. (A) H. pylori-infected participants before the intervention; (B) H. pylori non-infected participants after the intervention. H. pylori (−): H. pylori non-infected participants; H. pylori (+): H. pylori-infected participants.
Figure 3. Effect of consuming the probiotic gelatin (100 g serving) containing 107 CFU mL−1 L. fermentum UCO-979C strain (in 100 g serving) for 12 weeks on the percentage of H. pylori-infected participants at the end of the intervention. (A) H. pylori-infected participants before the intervention; (B) H. pylori non-infected participants after the intervention. H. pylori (−): H. pylori non-infected participants; H. pylori (+): H. pylori-infected participants.
Foods 11 01668 g003
Table
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants in the groups receiving probiotic- or placebo-supplemented gelatin.
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants in the groups receiving probiotic- or placebo-supplemented gelatin.
Demographic and Clinical CharacteristicsPlacebo (N 64)Probiotic (N 67)p-Value
Age in years (average ± DS)22.34 ± 2.9222.67 ± 2.840.3274
Gender0.7213
 Women4039
 Men2428
Pathology
 Irritable bowel420.4399
 Diabetes 310.3650
 Lupus01>0.9999
 Gastroesophageal refluxs01>0.9999
 Gastritis 020.4960
 Lactose intolerance 840.2354
Alcohol consumption46390.1426
Asthma260.2732
Allergy350.7176
Table
Table 2. H. pylori-infected and non-infected participants before and after the end of the treatment.
Table 2. H. pylori-infected and non-infected participants before and after the end of the treatment.
InterventionPre-TreatmentPost-Treatmentp-Value
H. pylori (+)/%H. pylori (−)/%
H. pylori (+) >0.9999
Placebo2626/1000/0
Probiotic3029/96.71/3.3
Total5655/98.21/1.8
H. pylori (−) 0.0005
Placebo3813/34.225/65.8
Probiotic371/2.736/97.3
Total7514/18.761/81.3
H. pylori (+): H. pylori-infected participants; H. pylori (−): H. pylori non-infected participants.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Parra-Sepúlveda, C.; Sánchez-Alonzo, K.; Olivares-Muñoz, J.; Gutiérrez-Zamorano, C.; Smith, C.T.; Carvajal, R.I.; Sáez-Carrillo, K.; González, C.; García-Cancino, A. Consumption of a Gelatin Supplemented with the Probiotic Strain Limosilactobacillus fermentum UCO-979C Prevents Helicobacter pylori Infection in a Young Adult Population Achieved. Foods 2022, 11, 1668. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11121668

AMA Style

Parra-Sepúlveda C, Sánchez-Alonzo K, Olivares-Muñoz J, Gutiérrez-Zamorano C, Smith CT, Carvajal RI, Sáez-Carrillo K, González C, García-Cancino A. Consumption of a Gelatin Supplemented with the Probiotic Strain Limosilactobacillus fermentum UCO-979C Prevents Helicobacter pylori Infection in a Young Adult Population Achieved. Foods. 2022; 11(12):1668. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11121668

Chicago/Turabian Style

Parra-Sepúlveda, Cristian, Kimberly Sánchez-Alonzo, Joaquín Olivares-Muñoz, Cristian Gutiérrez-Zamorano, Carlos T. Smith, Romina I. Carvajal, Katia Sáez-Carrillo, Carlos González, and Apolinaria García-Cancino. 2022. "Consumption of a Gelatin Supplemented with the Probiotic Strain Limosilactobacillus fermentum UCO-979C Prevents Helicobacter pylori Infection in a Young Adult Population Achieved" Foods 11, no. 12: 1668. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11121668

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop