Next Article in Journal
Automatic and Intelligent Technologies of Solid-State Fermentation Process of Baijiu Production: Applications, Challenges, and Prospects
Next Article in Special Issue
Brown Algae Phlorotannins: A Marine Alternative to Break the Oxidative Stress, Inflammation and Cancer Network
Previous Article in Journal
Consumer-Led Adaptation of the EsSense Profile® for Herbal Infusions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fighting Iron-Deficiency Anemia: Innovations in Food Fortificants and Biofortification Strategies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Coffee By-Products and Their Suitability for Developing Active Food Packaging Materials

by
Gonçalo Oliveira
1,2,
Cláudia P. Passos
2,
Paula Ferreira
1,
Manuel A. Coimbra
2 and
Idalina Gonçalves
1,*
1
CICECO–Aveiro Institute of Materials, Department of Materials and Ceramic Engineering, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
2
LAQV-REQUIMTE, Department of Chemistry, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2021, 10(3), 683; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10030683
Submission received: 25 February 2021 / Revised: 18 March 2021 / Accepted: 19 March 2021 / Published: 23 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reviews on Food Physics and Food (Bio)Chemistry)

Abstract

:
The coffee industry generates a wide variety of by-products derived from green coffee processing (pulp, mucilage, parchment, and husk) and roasting (silverskin and spent coffee grounds). All these fractions are simply discarded, despite their high potential value. Given their polysaccharide-rich composition, along with a significant number of other active biomolecules, coffee by-products are being considered for use in the production of plastics, in line with the notion of the circular economy. This review highlights the chemical composition of coffee by-products and their fractionation, evaluating their potential for use either as polymeric matrices or additives for developing plastic materials. Coffee by-product-derived molecules can confer antioxidant and antimicrobial activities upon plastic materials, as well as surface hydrophobicity, gas impermeability, and increased mechanical resistance, suitable for the development of active food packaging. Overall, this review aims to identify sustainable and eco-friendly strategies for valorizing coffee by-products while offering suitable raw materials for biodegradable plastic formulations, emphasizing their application in the food packaging sector.

1. Introduction

Since the 1960s, world plastic production has increased, reaching 360 million tons in 2018 [1]. A great part of the produced plastics are single-use materials made of nonbiodegradable, petroleum-based molecules, with the most part being landfilled or discarded in water streams, ending in oceans as microparticles. Seeking to diminish the global nonbiodegradable plastic environmental impact, efforts are being made to use recyclable, biodegradable, or compostable plastic packaging materials by 2030 [2]. In this context, bioplastics have attracted the attention of the plastics industry. Bioplastic is a plastic material which is either bio-based or biodegradable [3], whereby none of the compounds released from the plastic formulations present environmental toxicity. The synthesized polyester polylactic acid (PLA) is one of the most commonly used polymers for bioplastic production [4]. However, when compared with the most widely used petrochemical plastics, PLA has low thermal stability [5] and poor water vapor and gas barrier properties [6], limiting its application range. PLA has been obtained from the fermentation of different starch-rich vegetables, such as corn, beet, or wheat bran [7], representing a societal disadvantage, since these raw materials are directly used in human and animal nutrition. To avoid any kind of competition between different industry sectors, biomolecules of interest for developing bioplastics must be recovered from agri-food by-products. This goal has been pursued by using agri-food by-products such as apple pulp waste as a carbon source for microbial fermentation in the production of bioplastic polymers, namely, polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) [8]. Another strategy is the use of starch and lipidic molecules recovered from potato and rice by-products in the development of starch-based films [9,10,11,12]. The film-forming ability of starch allows its use as the main polymer matrix for the development of bioplastic materials, while lipids are used to confer hydrophobicity and plasticity/elasticity. Herein, instead of simply being discarded, agri-food by-products may be introduced into new bioplastic processing chains, promoting a circular economy between the agri-food and plastic sectors. Furthermore, agri-food by-products can be used to confer biodegradability upon petroleum-based plastics, or to increase the biodegradation rate of synthetic plastics, as observed when potato peel waste is incorporated into polyethylene and polypropylene formulations [13], and when cellulose fibers obtained from sugar cane leaf are added into polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) formulations [14].
Coffee production generates a number of by-products derived from the plant, namely, the flowers, which are available at pre-harvesting, by-products derived from the harvesting of the cherries, and the leaves, stems, twigs, and wood, mainly left post-harvesting, which have potential uses in the food sector [15]. The coffee industry, while processing the cherries, also generates a variety of by-products with distinct chemical compositions, including coffee pulp (CP), mucilage (CM), parchment (CPm), husks (CH), silverskin (CS) and spent coffee grounds (SCG). These by-products have been proposed for multiple applications due to their high biodegradability, namely, as substrates for the production of enzymes, bioethanol, and biogas by microorganisms [16]. Coffee by-products have also been suggested as biosorbents for water treatment [17,18,19] or as a source of dietary fiber and food ingredient active compounds, including chlorogenic acids and caffeine [15,20,21]. The diversity of coffee by-products represents a source of different molecules suitable for the development of plastics with different physicochemical and/or biological properties. This review focuses on the feasibility of using coffee by-products for the development of plastics with improved physicochemical, mechanical, barrier, and biodegradability properties, detailing their chemical composition and discussing their potential for use either as polymeric matrices or as a functional additive for food packaging.

2. Coffee By-Products and Their Potential for Use in the Development of Plastics

2.1. The Coffee Industry and Its By-Products

The coffee industry is one of the largest food industries in the world. It is divided into two main sectors: the first includes the separation of shell and mucilaginous part from the coffee cherries in order to recover coffee beans, implemented in coffee-producing countries; the second is responsible for the roasting and brewing transformation steps, which occur after shipping the beans to coffee distributing and consuming countries. According to the International Coffee Organization (ICO), global coffee production reached 169 million 60 kg bags in 2019/2020 [22]. The great demand for this product has led to the production of an excessive amount of by-products during all coffee processing steps (Figure 1).
Coffee flowers are known as a source of caffeine and trigonelline, as well as phenolic compounds [23]. However, as no toxicological data seems to be available for their use in foods [15], their potential for valorization is still limited. Coffee leaves contain a large diversity of compounds [24] which may be valorized as bioactive compounds with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antihypertensive, antibacterial, and antifungal activities [15]. Although no studies exist for their application in food packaging, coffee leaves seem to be a very promising source of compounds for this purpose.
Coffee cherry can be processed by two different methods, designated as dry and wet processing methods [25], which yield different by-products. CH result from the dry processing method. It correspond to the outer layers (from endocarp to epicarp) removed from the dried cherry, representing 45% of fresh coffee cherry weight [26]. This means that per 100 kg of dry processed fresh coffee cherries, 45 kg of CH are obtained. CH are also named “cascara”, corresponding to a mixture of skin, pulp, mucilage, parchment, and part of silverskin resulting from the dry processing method [27]. “Sticky” CH is an additional by-product that can be obtained when the parchment layer is not removed with the outer layers, resulting in a by-product with a high level of protein and low level of fiber [28,29]. In the wet processing method, CP, also named “fresh cascara”, is a by-product that corresponds to a mixture of coffee cherry outer skin and pulp layer that can be separated by depulping in water [27]. CM is a sticky mucilage layer obtained by the mechanical action of the applied equipment or by the action of fermenting enzymes when the depulped coffee beans are placed in fermentation tanks. After washing, drying, and dehulling the fermented coffee beans, CPm is the last by-product of this process. From 100 kg of wet processed fresh coffee cherries, 39 kg of CP, 22 kg of CM, and 39 kg of CPm are obtained [27], which means that part of the water added during wet processing is retained in CP and CM. All these by-products remain in coffee-producing countries, being incinerated or used for biofuel production [30,31], limiting their reuse in other applications.
During green coffee roasting, bean blow-up leads to the release of a thin layer called CS. When the roasted coffee beans are ground and used for brew preparation, the compounds that are not extracted by hot water are named SCG. For 100 kg of green coffee beans, around 2.1 kg of CS [27] and 65 kg of SCG [16] are produced. Since 100 kg of fresh coffee cherries give rise to around 21 kg of green coffee beans [32], 0.4 kg of CS and 14 kg of SCG are obtained from 100 kg of coffee cherries. Although most of the CS and SCG is usually incinerated or landfilled, these materials have the potential to be used as food ingredients [33,34], mainly due to their dietary fiber-rich composition. Moreover, the use of SCG has been proposed for diverse applications, such as cosmetics, animal feed, bioethanol production, adsorbents, and fertilizers [27].
The valorization of coffee by-products and potential applications depend on their chemical composition (Table 1).

2.1.1. Coffee Pulp and Mucilage

Coffee pulp (CP) is one of the main coffee wet processing by-products. CP has a high moisture content (78–81% wt) [31,35], due to the incorporation of water during the washing of coffee cherries before the depulping process. This high-water activity promotes microbial spoilage, a problem faced by all by-products where the water content is not decreased to a level that promotes stabilization. On a dry weight basis, CP is mostly constituted of cellulose (36%), pectic polysaccharides (21%), a fraction of alkaline soluble polysaccharides defined as hemicelluloses (9%), and free sugars (5%) [36]. CP pectic polysaccharides comprise 80% galacturonic acid, 63% methyl esterification degree (DE), 6% acetylation degree (DA), and high molecular weight (4 × 105 g/mol), giving rise to a gel-forming ability in the presence of high sucrose concentration and low pH [37]. Nevertheless, the CP content in pectic polysaccharides and free sugars is lower when compared with other vegetable-derived pulps such as apple pomace [38]. This may be a consequence of carbohydrate degradation caused by the action of endogenous enzymes, since wet CP is not immediately dried and/or frozen after the depulping process. CP is also made up of proteins (9%), alkaloids (1%), lipids (0.8%), and phenolic compounds (3 mg g−1 of gallic acid equivalents, GAE) [36]. The CP protein content is often estimated according to the Kjeldahl method and using the N × 6.25 conversion factor, after the total nitrogen determination. However, CP is also composed of other nitrogenous compounds, namely caffeine (C8H10N4O2) and trigonelline (C7H7NO2). Therefore, most reported CP protein content values may be overestimated. Concerning CP lipids, they are derived from the cherry skin (epicarp), with cutin being the most abundant compound. Cutin is a polyester formed by esterified ω-hydroxy and ω-hydroxy-epoxy fatty acids and glycerol [39]. The CP phenolic composition includes hydroxycinnamic acids (59%), flavanols (17%), and hydroxycoumarins (6%) [40].
Coffee mucilage (CM) has a high moisture content (84% wt) [41], in the same order of magnitude as that of CP. On a dry weight basis, CM is mainly constituted by pectic polysaccharides (30%), hemicelluloses (18%), proteins (17%), and cellulose (8%) [48]. CM pectic polysaccharides have 52% galacturonic acid, 85% DE, 6% DA, and gel-forming ability [52]. However, this ability may be compromised, given the lower molecular weight of CM pectic polysaccharides (1.2 × 104 g/mol) when compared with CP [48]. Also, the higher content of pectic polysaccharides observed in CM contradicts a previous study, where it was reported that CP had a pectic polysaccharide content two times higher than CM [59]. The presence of pectic polysaccharides in the chemical compositions of CM and CH enhances their potential to be directly applied in the development of bioplastics. CM pectic polysaccharides derived from fermentation and from the mechanical removal process have similar chemical compositions. Fermentation only induces a slight decrease of the pectic polysaccharide intrinsic viscosity and average molecular weight, and a two-fold increase of its DA [60], which would not compromise the valorization of fermentation-derived CM.

2.1.2. Coffee Husks

Coffee husks (CH) are the only by-product derived from coffee cherry drying and dehusking (Figure 1). CH have a moisture content of 13–15% [29,43], depending on the drying process time. On a dry weight basis, CH are constituted of lignin (38%), cellulose (28%), and a fraction of hemicelluloses (25%) rich in xylose residues [50], possibly derived from glucuronoxylans, a polysaccharide usually present in lignified tissues [61]. CH are also made up of proteins (8–11%), lipids (1–3%), and caffeine (1%) [29,53]. CH ashes account for 3–7% [29,55]. As in CP, the protein content may be overestimated due to the presence of other nitrogenous compounds. The lipid fraction may derive from the cherry skin cutin and also from silverskin partially removed during the dehusking process [27]. CH are rich in phenolic compounds (13 mg g−1 of GAE), mainly caffeic and chlorogenic acids [58]. The paucity of data available shows that for the valorization of CH, much more research is required.

2.1.3. Coffee Parchment and Silverskin

Coffee parchment (CPm) is a fibrous endocarp that covers the coffee cherry epidermis and endosperm. Since this by-product is obtained after drying and dehulling the beans, its moisture content is low (9% wt) [42]. On a dry weight basis, CPm is composed of xylans (35%), lignin (32%), and cellulose (12%) [49]. CPm ashes account for 1% [55]. This composition shows the insoluble nature of CPm, with possible application in the development of food packaging plastics. CPm has a high water (3 mLg−1) and oil (4 mLg−1) holding capacity [49], allowing its use as barrier, avoiding condensation of water inside food packaging, as well as the migration of fat from greasy foods. CPm is also composed of caffeine (0.13%) and phenolic compounds (2 mg g−1 of GAE), namely gallic acid, chlorogenic acids, p-coumaric acid, and sinapic acid [42], which provide antioxidant activity. As observed for CH, the potential for the of valorization of CPm is significant.
Coffee silverskin (CS) is a thin tegument of the coffee bean outer layer, being the most abundant by-product associated with coffee roasting. It has a low moisture content (4–7% wt) [34,44,45,46], facilitating its storage and direct use. CS composition is similar to that of CPm, given their proximity inside the cherry. On a dry weight basis, CS is constituted of polysaccharides (40%), mainly cellulose (59%), with a small proportion of xylose (19%), arabinose (9%), galactose (9%), and mannose (4%) [51]. No information about CS polysaccharides glycosidic-linkage composition has been yet reported. CS also contains lignin (29%) [51], proteins (19%), and lipids (2–5%), while CS ashes account for 5–7% [34,44,45,51]. Furthermore, CS contains caffeine (1%) and phenolic compounds (2% w/w GAE), mainly chlorogenic acids as 3-O-caffeoylquinic acid and 4-O-caffeoylquinic acid [57]. As in CP and CH, the protein content of CS may be overestimated because of other nitrogenous fractions present in CS, since most of the reported studies used the nitrogen content for protein quantification in non-purified fractions. The presence of lipids in CS, in contrast to CPm, is due to its proximity to the cherry endosperm (coffee bean), which has a significant fraction of lipids (8–18% of the green coffee bean dry weight) [41]. Because CS derives from the roasting process, it is also composed of melanoidins (5%), which are nitrogenous high molecular weight heterogeneous polymers formed through Maillard reactions during roasting [34].

2.1.4. Spent Coffee Grounds

Spent coffee grounds (SCG) are wet solid residues (61% of moisture [47]) that remain after coffee brewing, being produced all over the world where coffee is consumed. The high accessibility of this coffee by-product facilitates the study of its chemical characterization and further applications. On a dry weight basis, SCG are constituted by polysaccharides (66%), mainly galactomannans (50%), arabinogalactans (25%), and cellulose (25%) [47,62]. Coffee galactomannans are high molecular weight polysaccharides with low branching degree, arranged by a backbone of (β1→4)-linked mannose residues, with O-6 single (α1→6)-linked galactose and single (1→5)-linked arabinose residues [63]. They are water-soluble and form highly viscous and stable aqueous solutions with film-forming ability [64,65], which makes them suitable raw materials for the production of edible and biodegradable films or coatings for food applications [66]. The amount of melanoidins in SCG is estimated to be 16%, with 5% of proteins [47], 13–15% lipids [47,54], 0.01–0.5% of caffeine, and phenolic compounds (1–2% w/w GAE) [56]. SCG phenolic composition includes mainly chlorogenic acids (85%), such as 3-O-caffeoylquinic acid, 4-O-caffeoylquinic acid, and 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid, and also caffeic acid (6%) [67]. Ashes account for 2% [56]. SCG-derived oil is composed mainly of linoleic (45%) and palmitic (38%) acids [68], and also by diterpenes (15%), namely kahweol, cafestol and 16-O-methylcafestol [69]. Although slight variations can occur in the chemical composition of SCG according to the coffee brew extraction conditions [70] and the composition of the roasted coffee beans, which depends on the coffee species and postharvest processing conditions, the SCG overall composition seems to be highly consistent for food packaging applications.

2.2. Coffee By-Products for the Production of Plastics

The use of coffee by-products in the development of sustainable plastic formulations for food packaging follows two main strategies: (1) the use of crude coffee by-products as functional additives for plastics; or (2) the use of coffee by-product-derived extracts with film-forming ability or functional properties (Figure 2).

2.2.1. Crude Coffee By-Products as Functional Additives for Plastics

The crude form of coffee by-products, namely CH, CS, and SCG, has been incorporated into plastic formulations. This strategy presents a zero-waste approach, since all the crude fractions can be used without generating residues. Many studies have reported the incorporation of crude coffee by-products into nonbiodegradable plastics (Table 2), with the goal of conferring biodegradability upon petroleum-based materials. This can be seen as a first step towards a full bio-based and biodegradable formulation which is able to provide the same functionalities as petroleum-based materials.

Nonbiodegradable Formulations

CH [71] and SCG [78] powder can be incorporated into polypropylene (PP)-based formulations, and CS powder [77] into high-density polyethylene (HDPE)-based formulations. These composites showed increased rigidity and decreased elongation at break, due to the poor interfacial adhesion between coffee by-products and the polymeric matrices. This incompatibility can be caused by the different nature of molecules in the same plastic formulation. While coffee by-products are mainly constituted of carbohydrates rich in hydroxyl groups, thus possessing a polar nature, the matrix of petroleum-based polymers is constituted by nonpolar hydrocarbons.
One strategy to increase the interfacial adhesion between coffee by-products and petroleum-based polymers is the addition of malleated compatibilizers into the formulation. For instance, maleic anhydride grafted PP [72] and PE [73] were added, together with CH powder, to PP and PE-based formulations, respectively. The maleic anhydride groups interacted with the hydroxyl groups of CH carbohydrates through covalent bonds, while the long molecular chains of malleated compounds entangled the hydrophobic petroleum-based matrix, increasing the constituent compatibility and giving rise to with good interfacial adhesion [83]. Also, the incorporation of CH powder together with maleic anhydride grafted PP in a PP-based formulation reduces the flammability of the composite [74] and the carbon footprint [75], compared with neat PP composites.
Another strategy to increase compatibilization is the chemical modification of crude coffee by-products before their addition into petroleum-based formulations. Herein, small modification techniques, such as alkaline treatment or esterification of coffee by-products are proposed. The performance of an alkaline treatment upon crude CH seems to be effective at improving the mechanical and thermal performance of PP-based composites [76]. Alkali treatment removes alkaline soluble polysaccharides, lipids, impurities, and a fraction of the lignin from coffee by-products, exposing more cellulose molecules and increasing the number of reaction sites [84]. For instance, alkali treated and bleached SCG, and its mixture with PP-based formulations, together with silane and styrene-ethylene-butene-styrene-graft-maleic anhydride as coupling agents, showed improved composite interfacial adhesion and mechanical properties by establishing stronger interactions with the polymeric matrix [81]. Alternatively, the addition of SCG powder esterified with palmitoyl chloride can originate better particle dispersion and a decrease in water uptake upon PP-based composites [80]. During esterification, the polar carbohydrate hydroxyl groups of coffee by-products react with acetyl groups, decreasing the molecule polarity and increasing their compatibility with the nonpolar hydrocarbon-based matrix [85]. This chemical modification also leads to the hydrophobization of coffee by-product compounds. In a combination of the two chemical modification techniques previously described, the incorporation of alkali treated and esterified CS powder into high-density polyethylene (HDPE)-based formulations can be performed to develop composites with decreased water absorption [77]. All composites containing CS are brownish, the intensity of which increased with CS concentration, due to the presence of melanoidins [34]. Another strategy that increases the compatibilization between SCG and a PP-based matrix is the removal of the SCG lipid fraction [79]. The defatting process leads to a better dispersion of SCG into a malleated-PP-based matrix, improving its interfacial adhesion and producing composites with better water resistance. SCG acid hydrolysis can remove the majority of carbohydrates, increasing the accessibility to SCG phenolic compounds. When added to a polyethylene (PE)-based formulation, acid hydrolysis treated SCG are able to increase the antioxidant ability and biocompatibility of the resultant films, enhancing their potential for use for the preservation of food lipids [82].
Although a large number of studies are already available in the literature concerning the addition of crude coffee by-products to increase the biodegradability of petroleum-based plastics, no biodegradability studies have been described. There is a need for biodegradation tests in order to evaluate if crude coffee by-products have the ability to confer biodegradability upon petroleum-based materials, minimizing their negative impact on the environment.

Biodegradable Formulations

Crude coffee by-products have also been used as additives of biodegradable plastic formulations (synthetic and bio-based) (Table 3).
Concerning the direct use of coffee by-products in their crude form, CH powder, when added to polycaprolactone (PCL)-based formulations, increases their biodegradation rate by acting as a support for microorganism adhesion [86]. CH and CPm can also be used as reinforcing fillers of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB)-based compounds, a biodegradable thermoplastic polyester produced by bacterial fermentation, increasing their water absorption and thermal stability by delaying their degradation temperature [89]. Moreover, crude CS can be used as an additive of PBAT and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (P(3HB-co-3HV)) blended formulations, leading to the development of composites with increased rigidity and antioxidant properties [90], in accordance with the reported antioxidant activity verified in CS extracts [57,101,102]. Crude CS has the potential to integrate bio-based industrial injection molding formulations for coffee capsules, as demonstrated by its addition to P(3HB-co-3HV), together with acetyl tributyl citrate and calcium carbonate as a plasticizer and inorganic filler, respectively. However, the low interfacial adhesion between CS and P(3HB-co-3HV) matrix obtained after injection molding of the composites [92] needs to be improved.
To improve the compatibility between coffee by-products and synthetic biodegradable polyesters, the modification of coffee by-products by silane-based compounds has been proposed. Silane molecules, such as (3-glycidoxypropyl) trimethoxysilane, have bifunctional groups that can act as coupling agents between the hydroxyl groups of polysaccharides and the epoxy of the nonpolar polyester that constitute the synthetic matrix [103]. It was claimed that the incorporation of silane treated crude CH into polybutylene adipate terephthalate (PBAT)-based formulations can yield composites with higher hydrophobicity and stiffness than neat PBAT-based composites, as well as lower production costs (32%), making these materials competitive with conventional commercial polymers [87]. Better interfacial adhesion between CS and PBAT/P(3HB-co-3HV) blend can also be obtained after performing silane treatment on crude CS [91]. Tetraethyl orthosilicate can also be used to increase the homogeneity, water resistance, and biodegradability of maleic-anhydride-grafted PLA/SCG-based formulations [94].
The torrefaction of coffee by-products before their addition into bioplastic-based formulations is another strategy adopted to increase the biocompatibility between crude coffee by-products and polyesters. In this context, torrefaction has been used as a strategy to produce coal fuel from biomass at 200–300 °C under inert nitrogen gas atmosphere [104], making it possible to increase the hydrophobicity of the material by the dehydration of cellulose and lignin, thereby reducing the number of hydroxyl groups available [105]. The addition of torrefied CH into PLA-based formulations increases the mechanical resistance and improves the thermal stability by delaying the degradation time of the corresponding mold injected specimens [88]. Moreover, the torrefaction of SCG increases the hydrophobicity of PBAT/SCG-based composites, enhancing the potential of this treatment to develop hydrophobic food packaging materials, which can extend food shelf-life by preventing interaction with water [95].
When applied to polar polymeric matrices, coffee by-products can be blended with other polar compounds, such as polysaccharides, to develop homogeneous materials, as observed when chitosan was incorporated into PVA/SCG-based formulations [96]. As a result, SCG can be successfully incorporated into the polymeric matrix, yielding composites which are suitable for adsorbing pharmaceutical contaminants in water [96]. This property may also be relevant for active food packaging.
When coffee by-products are added into polysaccharide-based formulations, good compatibilization can be achieved without previous treatment or incorporation of any compatibilizer agent into the plastic formulation. The incorporation of crude SCG powder into corn starch-based formulations leads to the development of films with increased tensile strength [97]. Similarly, the incorporation of crude SCG powder into cellulose-based formulations leads to the development of films with decreased light transmission (high light resistance), with potential for use in vegetable packaging [98]. Moreover, crude SCG has the potential to increase the water tolerance of pectin-based films [99,100]. Regarding crude CS, its addition into potato starch-based formulations led to the development of films with increased elasticity, stretchability, and water resistance while conferring antioxidant and UV-protective abilities upon the pristine potato starch-based films [93]. Therefore, blending coffee by-products with polysaccharide-based formulations can lead to the creation of materials which are competitive with nonbiodegradable food packaging plastics.

2.2.2. Coffee By-Product-Derived Extracts with Film-Forming Ability or Functional Properties

Coffee by-products are a source of compounds with film-forming ability or functional molecules, such as lipids, phenolics, and polysaccharides, which are suitable for the production of plastics with improved performance for food packaging (Table 4).
Regarding lipid-rich extracts, among all coffee by-products, only SCG have been used due to their high lipid content (13–15% dry wt basis) (Table 1). SCG-derived oil can be incorporated into PLA-based formulations, giving rise to composites with increased toughness and suitable for 3D-printing applications, due to the uniform distribution of SCG-oil molecules within the polymeric matrix [106]. Also, the addition of SCG fatty acids-rich extracts combined with diatomite leads to the development of multifunctional PLA-based films with increased interfacial adhesion and decreased oxygen permeability [107]. Herein, the molecules of SCG-extract and diatomite act as reinforcing fillers, hindering the diffusion of air molecules through the PLA-based matrix.
Phenolic-rich extracts obtained from coffee by-products have been used to confer active properties upon plastic polysaccharide-based formulations. Phenolic-rich extracts obtained from CP develop yellowish films with increased water resistance (decreased water vapor permeability and water solubility), antioxidant, and antimicrobial properties when incorporated into chitosan-based formulations [108], having the potential to prevent food oxidation reactions when used as packaging due to the radical scavenging activity of coffee phenolic compounds [109]. Moreover, the inherent antimicrobial activity of coffee phenolic compounds, namely chlorogenic acids, can also confer protection against microbial spoilage [110]. Similarly to chitosan-based formulations, corn starch-based films with increased tensile strength, decreased water vapor and oxygen permeabilities (by 30% and 50–85%, respectively), and antioxidant/antibacterial activities have been reported by the addition of CH hydrothermal aqueous extracts [58]. These extracts have also been used to confer antioxidant activity and to decrease the oxygen permeability of corn starch/PLA-based films [111]. Gellan gum-based films with antifungal properties have also been prepared with phenolic-rich extracts obtained from CPm [42]. Phenolic-rich extracts recovered from SCG can also originate from PVA/cassava starch- [112] and cassava starch- [113] based films with active properties, namely antioxidant, antimicrobial, and antibacterial activities. Although the increased tensile strength of the films has been attributed to the phenolic compounds present in the extracts, it is possible that this effect is due to co-extracted polysaccharides. In addition, the co-extraction of alkaloids, such as caffeine, may also contribute to the antimicrobial properties of the films [114].
Regarding polysaccharides, cellulose-rich materials have been used to enhance the physicochemical and mechanical performance of bioplastics. After delignification and bleaching CH, the obtained cellulose fibers (10–50 μm diameter and 1–3 mm length [115]) are capable of increasing the toughness of corn starch-based formulations [58]. After hydrolysis of CH-derived cellulose, the resulting cellulose nanocrystals (2–20 nm diameter and 100–600 nm length [116]) are capable of increasing the traction resistance of corn starch/PLA-based matrices [111]. On the other hand, cellulose nanocrystals-derived from CS (8 nm diameter and 80 nm length) decrease the water vapor and oxygen permeabilities of PLA-based matrices [117]. Moreover, galactomannan and arabinogalactan-rich extracts derived from SCG increase the light barrier, tensile resistance, and surface hydrophobicity of carboxymethyl cellulose-based films [118].
Coffee by-product-derived polysaccharides with film-forming ability can be directly used to form bioplastics. Pectic polysaccharides (DE 85%) obtained from CM can be used as polymeric matrices in bioplastics production, yielding biodegradable films with rigidity and water insolubility [52] for use as food packaging. Moreover, polysaccharide-rich extracts obtained from SCG can yield light-brownish films [64], with potential to protect foodstuffs from light when used as packaging. However, these SCG-derived films are heterogeneous and possess surface aggregates, which compromise their mechanical performance. While the brownish coloration derives from SCG melanoidins, the presence of aggregates (visible dark brown spots) may be related with the formation of complexes between polysaccharides and chlorogenic acids during film development. The partial removal of (β1→4)-linked glucose residues from this extract (12%) by enzymatic hydrolysis can be performed to obtain a fraction rich in galactomannans which is able to form light-brown heterogeneous films with higher rigidity. The presence of less (β1→4)-linked residues in the extract increases the galactomannan intermolecular bonds [65]. Future research in this area is essential to extend the application range of these materials, e.g., making them suitable for food packaging applications.

3. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

This review addresses the potential of using coffee by-products either as crude additives or as coffee by-products-derived extracts rich in lipids, phenolics, and polysaccharides, to improve the physicochemical, mechanical, barrier, and biodegradability properties of film-forming materials, thereby contributing to food packaging sustainability. Moreover, coffee by-products can be used as a source of compounds with film-forming ability, such as pectic polysaccharides from pulp and mucilage, and galactomannans from spent coffee grounds, in the development of bioplastics. Although coffee husks, coffee silverskin, and spent coffee grounds are the most studied plant parts regarding food packaging, all coffee by-products have potential for this purpose. Due to their inherent physicochemical constitution, coffee by-products may give rise to packaging materials with decisive properties for food preservation, such antioxidant activity, antimicrobial properties, increased mechanical resistance, and surface hydrophobicity, as well as improved gas barrier performance. These properties enable coffee by-products to extend their application range to the active food packaging sector while contributing to the circular economy. To this end, the dehydration of coffee byproducts, or any other procedure which allows them to retain their quality, is a requirement. Most studies to date were only performed on a laboratory scale, using solvent casting technology, and failed to provide information about the biodegradability performance of the developed materials. Aiming to fulfil the requirements of the active food packaging industry, the evaluation of the biodegradability, processability, and upscaling potential of coffee by-product-based materials is a significant challenge.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.O. and I.G.; investigation, G.O.; writing—original draft preparation, G.O. and I.G.; writing—review and editing, C.P.P., P.F., M.A.C. and I.G.; supervision, C.P.P., P.F., M.A.C. and I.G.; funding acquisition, C.P.P., P.F., M.A.C. and I.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work received financial support from PT national funds (FCT/MCTES, Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia and Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior) through the projects LAQV-REQUIMTE (UIDB/50006/2020), and CICECO-Aveiro Institute of Materials (FCT Ref. UIDB/50011/2020 & UIDP/50011/2020).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

FCT is thanked for the Investigator FCT program (PF, IF/00300/2015), for the Individual Call to Scientific Employment Stimulus (IG, CEECIND/00430/2017 and CP, CEECIND/01873/2017) and the PhD grant (GO, SFRH/BD/143191/2019).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Plastics Europe. Plastics—the Facts 2019. Available online: https://www.plasticseurope.org/en/resources/publications/1804-plastics-facts-2019 (accessed on 21 December 2020).
  2. European Union: European Comission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Commission Work Programme 2018—An Agenda for a More United, Stronger and More Democratic Europe. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52017DC0650&from=en (accessed on 22 December 2020).
  3. European Bioplastics. What Are Bioplastics? Available online: https://www.european-bioplastics.org/bioplastics (accessed on 4 January 2021).
  4. Tawakkal, I.S.M.A.; Cran, M.J.; Miltz, J.; Bigger, S.W. A Review of Poly(Lactic Acid)-Based Materials for Antimicrobial Packaging. J. Food Sci. 2014, 79, R1477–R1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Carrasco, F.; Pagès, P.; Gámez-Pérez, J.; Santana, O.O.; Maspoch, M.L. Processing of Poly(Lactic Acid): Characterization of Chemical Structure, Thermal Stability and Mechanical Properties. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2010, 95, 116–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sanchez-Garcia, M.D.; Lagaron, J.M. On the Use of Plant Cellulose Nanowhiskers to Enhance the Barrier Properties of Polylactic Acid. Cellulose 2010, 17, 987–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jamshidian, M.; Tehrany, E.A.; Imran, M.; Jacquot, M.; Desobry, S. Poly-Lactic Acid: Production, Applications, Nanocomposites, and Release Studies. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2010, 9, 552–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rebocho, A.T.; Pereira, J.R.; Freitas, F.; Neves, L.A.; Alves, V.D.; Sevrin, C.; Grandfils, C.; Reis, M.A.M. Production of Medium-Chain Length Polyhydroxyalkanoates by Pseudomonas Citronellolis Grown in Apple Pulp Waste. Appl. Food Biotechnol. 2019, 6, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gonçalves, I.; Lopes, J.; Barra, A.; Hernández, D.; Nunes, C.; Kapusniak, K.; Kapusniak, J.; Evtyugin, D.V.; Lopes da Silva, J.A.; Ferreira, P.; et al. Tailoring the Surface Properties and Flexibility of Starch-Based Films Using Oil and Waxes Recovered from Potato Chips Byproducts. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 163, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Mironescu, M. Investigations on Wastewaters at Potato Processing and Starch Recovery and Characterisation. J. Agroaliment. Process. Technol. 2011, 17, 134–138. [Google Scholar]
  11. Muangrat, R.; Nuankham, C. Moisture Sorption Isotherm and Changes in Physico-Mechanical Properties of Films Produced from Waste Flour and Their Application on Preservation Quality of Fresh Strawberry. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 6, 585–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Oliveira, G.; Gonçalves, I.; Nunes, C.; Ferreira, P.; Coimbra, M.A.; Martin, C.; Bras, J. Feasibility of Chitosan Crosslinked with Genipin as Biocoating for Cellulose-Based Materials. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 242, 116429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sugumaran, V.; Bhunia, H.; Narula, A.K. Evaluation of Biodegradability of Potato Peel Powder Based Polyolefin Biocomposites. J. Polym. Environ. 2018, 26, 2049–2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bunmechimma, L.; Leejarkpai, T.; Riyajan, S.A. Fabrication and Physical Properties of a Novel Macroporous Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)/Cellulose Fibre Product. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 240, 116215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Klingel, T.; Kremer, J.I.; Gottstein, V.; De Rezende, T.R.; Schwarz, S.; Lachenmeier, D.W. A Review of Coffee By-Products Including Leaf, Flower, Cherry, Husk, Silver Skin, and Spent Grounds as Novel Foods within the European Union. Foods 2020, 9, 665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Murthy, P.S.; Naidu, M.M. Sustainable Management of Coffee Industry By-Products and Value Addition—A Review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2012, 66, 45–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Krishna Mohan, G.V.; Naga Babu, A.; Kalpana, K.; Ravindhranath, K. Removal of Chromium (VI) from Water Using Adsorbent Derived from Spent Coffee Grounds. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 16, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tran, T.H.; Le, A.H.; Pham, T.H.; Nguyen, D.T.; Chang, S.W.; Chung, W.J.; Nguyen, D.D. Adsorption Isotherms and Kinetic Modeling of Methylene Blue Dye onto a Carbonaceous Hydrochar Adsorbent Derived from Coffee Husk Waste. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 725, 138325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wen, X.; Liu, H.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, J.; Fu, C.; Shi, X.; Chen, X.; Mijowska, E.; Chen, M.J.; Wang, D.Y. Large-Scale Converting Waste Coffee Grounds into Functional Carbon Materials as High-Efficient Adsorbent for Organic Dyes. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 272, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Passos, C.P.; Sério, A.; Ferreira, S.S.; Kukurová, K.; Ciesarová, Z.; Nunes, F.M.; Coimbra, M.A. Microwave Assisted Extraction of Carbohydrate-Rich Fractions from Spent Coffee Grounds: Formulation of Biscuits Enriched in Dietary Fibre. Trends Carbohydr. Res. 2015, 7, 12–17. [Google Scholar]
  21. Iriondo-DeHond, A.; Aparicio García, N.; Fernandez-Gomez, B.; Guisantes-Batan, E.; Velázquez Escobar, F.; Blanch, G.P.; San Andres, M.I.; Sanchez-Fortun, S.; del Castillo, M.D. Validation of Coffee By-Products as Novel Food Ingredients. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2019, 51, 194–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. International Coffee Organisation. Monthly Coffee Market Report—November 2020. Available online: http://www.ico.org/Market-Report-20-21-e.asp (accessed on 4 January 2021).
  23. Nguyen, T.M.T.; Cho, E.J.; Song, Y.; Oh, C.H.; Funada, R.; Bae, H.J. Use of Coffee Flower as a Novel Resource for the Production of Bioactive Compounds, Melanoidins, and Bio-Sugars. Food Chem. 2019, 299, 125120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chen, X. A Review on Coffee Leaves: Phytochemicals, Bioactivities and Applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 1008–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. International Coffee Organization. International Coffee Organization—Field Processing. Available online: https://web.archive.org/web/20150316011430/http://www.ico.org/field_processing.asp (accessed on 8 December 2019).
  26. del Castillo, M.D.; Fernandez-Gomez, B.; Martinez-Saez, N.; Iriondo-DeHond, A.; Mesa, M.D. Coffee By-products. In Coffee: Production, Quality and Chemistry; Farah, A., Ed.; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2019; pp. 309–334. [Google Scholar]
  27. Iriondo-DeHond, A.; Iriondo-DeHond, M.; del Castillo, M.D. Applications of Compounds from Coffee Processing By-Products. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. de O. Carvalho, P.L.; Moreira,, I.; Furlan, A.C.; Paiano, D.; Piano, L.M.; Sierra, L.M.P. Sticky Coffee Hull Silage on the Feeding of Growing and Finishing Pigs. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2011, 40, 343–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Gouvea, B.M.; Torres, C.; Franca, A.S.; Oliveira, L.S.; Oliveira, E.S. Feasibility of Ethanol Production from Coffee Husks. Biotechnol. Lett. 2009, 31, 1315–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wondemagegnehu, E.B.; Gupta, N.K.; Habtu, E. Coffee Parchment as Potential Biofuel for Cement Industries of Ethiopia. Energy Sources Part A Recover Util. Environ. Eff. 2019, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gurram, R.; Al-Shannag, M.; Knapp, S.; Das, T.; Singsaas, E.; Alkasrawi, M. Technical Possibilities of Bioethanol Production from Coffee Pulp: A Renewable Feedstock. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2016, 18, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. The World Bank. Agro-Industry Profiles: Coffee. 1986. Available online: http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/311271467993475518/pdf/FAU14.pdf (accessed on 8 December 2019).
  33. Ateş, G.; Elmacı, Y. Coffee Silverskin as Fat Replacer in Cake Formulations and Its Effect on Physical, Chemical and Sensory Attributes of Cakes. LWT 2018, 90, 519–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Borrelli, R.; Esposito, F.; Napolitano, A.; Ritieni, A.; Fogliano, V.; Borrelli, R.C.; Esposito, F.; Napolitano, A.; Alberto Ritieni, A.; Fogliano, V. Characterization of a New Potential Functional Ingredient: Coffee Silverskin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 1338–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Orozco, F.H.; Cegarra, J.; Trujillo, L.M.; Roig, A. Vermicomposting of Coffee Pulp Using the Earthworm Eisenia Fetida: Effects on C and N Contents and the Availability of Nutrients. Biol. Fertil. Soils 1996, 22, 162–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rodríguez Frómeta, R.A.; Sánchez, J.L.; Ros García, J.M. Evaluation of Coffee Pulp as Substrate for Polygalacturonase Production in Solid State Fermentation. Emirates J. Food Agric. 2020, 32, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Reichembach, L.H.; de Oliveira Petkowicz, C.L. Extraction and Characterization of a Pectin from Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) Pulp with Gelling Properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 245, 116473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fernandes, P.A.R.; Silva, A.M.S.; Evtuguin, D.V.; Nunes, F.M.; Wessel, D.F.; Cardoso, S.M.; Coimbra, M.A. The Hydrophobic Polysaccharides of Apple Pomace. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 223, 115132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Nawrath, C. The Biopolymers Cutin and Suberin. Arab. B. 2002, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Londoño-Hernandez, L.; Ruiz, H.A.; Cristina Ramírez, T.; Ascacio, J.A.; Rodríguez-Herrera, R.; Aguilar, C.N. Fungal Detoxification of Coffee Pulp by Solid-State Fermentation. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 23, 101467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Esquivel, P.; Jiménez, V.M. Functional Properties of Coffee and Coffee By-Products. Food Res. Int. 2012, 46, 488–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mirón-Mérida, V.A.; Yáñez-Fernández, J.; Montañez-Barragán, B.; Barragán Huerta, B.E. Valorization of Coffee Parchment Waste (Coffea arabica) as a Source of Caffeine and Phenolic Compounds in Antifungal Gellan Gum Films. LWT 2019, 101, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shemekite, F.; Gómez-Brandón, M.; Franke-Whittle, I.H.; Praehauser, B.; Insam, H.; Assefa, F. Coffee Husk Composting: An Investigation of the Process Using Molecular and Non-Molecular Tools. Waste Manag. 2014, 34, 642–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Pourfarzad, A.; Mahdavian-Mehr, H.; Sedaghat, N. Coffee Silverskin as a Source of Dietary Fiber in Bread-Making: Optimization of Chemical Treatment Using Response Surface Methodology. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 50, 599–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hijosa-Valsero, M.; Garita-Cambronero, J.; Paniagua-García, A.I.; Díez-Antolínez, R. Biobutanol Production from Coffee Silverskin. Microb. Cell Fact. 2018, 17, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Toschi, T.G.; Cardenia, V.; Bonaga, G.; Mandrioli, M.; Rodriguez-Estrada, M.T. Coffee Silverskin: Characterization, Possible Uses, and Safety Aspects. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 10836–10844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Passos, C.P.; Coimbra, M.A. Microwave Superheated Water Extraction of Polysaccharides from Spent Coffee Grounds. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 94, 626–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Avallone, S.; Guiraud, J.-P.; Guyot, B.; Olguin, E.; Brillouet, J.-M. Polysaccharide Constituents of Coffee-Bean Mucilage. J. Food Sci. 2000, 65, 1308–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Benitez, V.; Rebollo-Hernanz, M.; Hernanz, S.; Chantres, S.; Aguilera, Y.; Martin-Cabrejas, M.A. Coffee Parchment as a New Dietary Fiber Ingredient: Functional and Physiological Characterization. Food Res. Int. 2019, 122, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Ávila, P.F.; Martins, M.; Goldbeck, R. Enzymatic Production of Xylooligosaccharides from Alkali-Solubilized Arabinoxylan from Sugarcane Straw and Coffee Husk. Bioenergy Res. 2020, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ballesteros, L.F.; Teixeira, J.A.; Mussatto, S.I. Chemical, Functional, and Structural Properties of Spent Coffee Grounds and Coffee Silverskin. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2014, 7, 3493–3503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Valdespino-León, M.; Calderón-Domínguez, G.; De La Paz Salgado-Cruz, M.; Rentería-Ortega, M.; Farrera-Rebollo, R.R.; Morales-Sánchez, E.; Gaona-Sánchez, V.A.; Terrazas-Valencia, F. Biodegradable Electrosprayed Pectin Films: An Alternative to Valorize Coffee Mucilage. Waste Biomass Valorization 2020, 1, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pandey, A.; Soccol, C.R.; Nigam, P.; Brand, D.; Mohan, R.; Roussos, S. Biotechnological Potential of Coffee Pulp and Coffee Husk for Bioprocesses. Biochem. Eng. J. 2000, 6, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Couto, R.M.; Fernandes, J.; da Silva, M.D.R.G.; Simões, P.C. Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Lipids from Spent Coffee Grounds. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2009, 51, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bekalo, S.A.; Reinhardt, H.W. Fibers of Coffee Husk and Hulls for the Production of Particleboard. Mater. Struct. Constr. 2010, 43, 1049–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Campos-Vega, R.; Loarca-Piña, G.; Vergara-Castañeda, H.A.; Dave Oomah, B. Spent Coffee Grounds: A Review on Current Research and Future Prospects. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 45, 24–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bresciani, L.; Calani, L.; Bruni, R.; Brighenti, F.; Del Rio, D. Phenolic Composition, Caffeine Content and Antioxidant Capacity of Coffee Silverskin. Food Res. Int. 2014, 61, 196–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Collazo-Bigliardi, S.; Ortega-Toro, R.; Chiralt, A. Improving Properties of Thermoplastic Starch Films by Incorporating Active Extracts and Cellulose Fibres Isolated from Rice or Coffee Husk. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2019, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Garcia, R.; Arriola, D.; De Arriola, M.C.; De Porres, E.; Rolz, C. Characterization of Coffee Pectin. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 1991, 24, 125–129. [Google Scholar]
  60. Avallon, S.; Guiraud, J.P.; Guyot, B.; Olguin, E.; Brillouet, J.M. Fate of Mucilage Cell Wall Polysaccharides during Coffee Fermentation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 5556–5559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Coimbra, M.A.; Waldron, K.W.; Selvendran, R.R. Isolation and Characterisation of Cell Wall Polymers from the Heavily Lignified Tissues of Olive (Olea Europaea) Seed Hull. Carbohydr. Polym. 1995, 27, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Passos, C.P.; Moreira, A.S.P.; Domingues, M.R.M.; Evtuguin, D.V.; Coimbra, M.A. Sequential Microwave Superheated Water Extraction of Mannans from Spent Coffee Grounds. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 103, 333–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Nunes, F.M.; Domingues, M.R.; Coimbra, M.A. Arabinosyl and Glucosyl Residues as Structural Features of Acetylated Galactomannans from Green and Roasted Coffee Infusions. Carbohydr. Res. 2005, 340, 1689–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Batista, M.J.P.A.; Ávila, A.F.; Franca, A.S.; Oliveira, L.S. Polysaccharide-Rich Fraction of Spent Coffee Grounds as Promising Biomaterial for Films Fabrication. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 233, 115851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Coelho, G.O.; Batista, M.J.A.; Ávila, A.F.; Franca, A.S.; Oliveira, L.S. Development and Characterization of Biopolymeric Films of Galactomannans Recovered from Spent Coffee Grounds. J. Food Eng. 2021, 289, 110083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Cerqueira, M.A.; Bourbon, A.I.; Pinheiro, A.C.; Martins, J.T.; Souza, B.W.S.; Teixeira, J.A.; Vicente, A.A. Galactomannans Use in the Development of Edible Films/Coatings for Food Applications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 22, 662–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Okur, I.; Soyler, B.; Sezer, P.; Oztop, M.H.; Alpas, H. Improving the Recovery of Phenolic Compounds from Spent Coffee Grounds (SCG) by Environmentally Friendly Extraction Techniques. Molecules 2021, 26, 613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. De Melo, M.M.R.; Barbosa, H.M.A.; Passos, C.P.; Silva, C.M. Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Spent Coffee Grounds: Measurement of Extraction Curves, Oil Characterization and Economic Analysis. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2014, 86, 150–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Barbosa, H.M.A.; de Melo, M.M.R.; Coimbra, M.A.; Passos, C.P.; Silva, C.M. Optimization of the Supercritical Fluid Coextraction of Oil and Diterpenes from Spent Coffee Grounds Using Experimental Design and Response Surface Methodology. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2014, 85, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Angeloni, G.; Guerrini, L.; Masella, P.; Bellumori, M.; Daluiso, S.; Parenti, A.; Innocenti, M. What Kind of Coffee Do You Drink? An Investigation on Effects of Eight Different Extraction Methods. Food Res. Int. 2019, 116, 1327–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Ilangovan, M.; Guna, V.; Hu, C.; Takemura, A.; Leman, Z.; Reddy, N. Dehulled Coffee Husk-Based Biocomposites for Green Building Materials. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 2019, 089270571987630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Leal, H.D.A.; Babetto, A.S.; Bonse, B.C. Properties of Lignocellulosic Composites of Coffee Husk Filled Polypropylene. In Proceedings of the AIP Conference Proceedings; American Institute of Physics Inc.: Melville, NY, USA, 10 January 2020; Volume 2205, p. 020072. [Google Scholar]
  73. Huang, L.; Mu, B.; Yi, X.; Li, S.; Wang, Q. Sustainable Use of Coffee Husks For Reinforcing Polyethylene Composites. J. Polym. Environ. 2018, 26, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Das, O.; Kim, N.K.; Hedenqvist, M.S.; Lin, R.J.T.; Sarmah, A.K.; Bhattacharyya, D. An Attempt to Find a Suitable Biomass for Biochar-Based Polypropylene Biocomposites. Environ. Manag. 2018, 62, 403–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Ángel Hidalgo-Salazar, M.; Pablo Correa-Aguirre, J.; Manuel Montalvo-Navarrete, J.; Fernando Lopez-Rodriguez, D.; Felipe Rojas-González, A. Recycled Polypropylene-Coffee Husk and Coir Coconut Biocomposites: Morphological, Mechanical, Thermal and Environmental Studies. In Thermosoftening Plastics; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  76. Yiga, V.A.; Pagel, S.; Lubwama, M.; Epple, S.; Olupot, P.W.; Bonten, C. Development of Fiber-Reinforced Polypropylene with NaOH Pretreated Rice and Coffee Husks as Fillers: Mechanical and Thermal Properties. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 2020, 33, 1269–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Dominici, F.; García García, D.; Fombuena, V.; Luzi, F.; Puglia, D.; Torre, L.; Balart, R. Bio-Polyethylene-Based Composites Reinforced with Alkali and Palmitoyl Chloride-Treated Coffee Silverskin. Molecules 2019, 24, 3113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Zarrinbakhsh, N.; Wang, T.; Rodriguez-Uribe, A.; Misra, M.K. Mohanty, A. Characterization of Wastes and Coproducts from the Coffee Industry for Composite Material Production. BioResources 2016, 11, 7637–7653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Wu, H.; Hu, W.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, L.; Zhang, J.; Tan, S.; Cai, X.; Liao, X. Effect of Oil Extraction on Properties of Spent Coffee Ground–Plastic Composites. J. Mater. Sci. 2016, 51, 10205–10214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. García-García, D.; Carbonell, A.; Samper, M.D.; García-Sanoguera, D.; Balart, R. Green Composites Based on Polypropylene Matrix and Hydrophobized Spend Coffee Ground (SCG) Powder. Compos. Part B Eng. 2015, 78, 256–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Essabir, H.; Raji, M.; Laaziz, S.A.; Rodrique, D.; Bouhfid, R.; Qaiss, A. el kacem Thermo-Mechanical Performances of Polypropylene Biocomposites Based on Untreated, Treated and Compatibilized Spent Coffee Grounds. Compos. Part B Eng. 2018, 149, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Panzella, L.; Cerruti, P.; Ambrogi, V.; Agustin-Salazar, S.; D’Errico, G.; Carfagna, C.; Goya, L.; Ramos, S.; Martín, M.A.; Napolitano, A.; et al. A Superior All-Natural Antioxidant Biomaterial from Spent Coffee Grounds for Polymer Stabilization, Cell Protection, and Food Lipid Preservation. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 1169–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Yang, H.S.; Kim, H.J.; Park, H.J.; Lee, B.J.; Hwang, T.S. Effect of Compatibilizing Agents on Rice-Husk Flour Reinforced Polypropylene Composites. Compos. Struct. 2007, 77, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ferreira, D.P.; Cruz, J.; Fangueiro, R. Surface modification of natural fibers in polymer composites. In Green Composites for Automotive Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 3–41. ISBN 9780081021774. [Google Scholar]
  85. Pickering, K.L.; Efendy, M.G.A.; Le, T.M. A Review of Recent Developments in Natural Fibre Composites and Their Mechanical Performance. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2016, 83, 98–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Borghesi, D.C.; Molina, M.F.; Guerra, M.A.; Campos, M.G.N. Biodegradation Study of a Novel Poly-Caprolactone-Coffee Husk Composite Film. Mater. Res. 2016, 19, 752–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Lule, Z.C.; Kim, J. Properties of Economical and Eco-Friendly Polybutylene Adipate Terephthalate Composites Loaded with Surface Treated Coffee Husk. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2021, 140, 106154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ortiz-Barajas, D.L.; Arévalo-Prada, J.A.; Fenollar, O.; Rueda-Ordóñez, Y.J.; Torres-Giner, S. Torrefaction of Coffee Husk Flour for the Development of Injection-Molded Green Composite Pieces of Polylactide with High Sustainability. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Reis, K.C.; Pereira, L.; Melo, I.C.N.A.; Marconcini, J.M.; Trugilho, P.F.; Tonoli, G.H.D. Particles of Coffee Wastes as Reinforcement in Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) Based Composites. Mater. Res. 2015, 18, 546–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Sarasini, F.; Tirillò, J.; Zuorro, A.; Maffei, G.; Lavecchia, R.; Puglia, D.; Dominici, F.; Luzi, F.; Valente, T.; Torre, L. Recycling Coffee Silverskin in Sustainable Composites Based on a Poly(Butylene Adipate-Co-Terephthalate)/Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate-Co-3-Hydroxyvalerate) Matrix. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 118, 311–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sarasini, F.; Luzi, F.; Dominici, F.; Maffei, G.; Iannone, A.; Zuorro, A.; Lavecchia, R.; Torre, L.; Carbonell-Verdu, A.; Balart, R.; et al. Effect of Different Compatibilizers on Sustainable Composites Based on a PHBV/PBAT Matrix Filled with Coffee Silverskin. Polym. Basel 2018, 10, 1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Gigante, V.; Seggiani, M.; Cinelli, P.; Signori, F.; Vania, A.; Navarini, L.; Amato, G.; Lazzeri, A. Utilization of Coffee Silverskin in the Production of Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate-Co-3-Hydroxyvalerate) Biopolymer-Based Thermoplastic Biocomposites for Food Contact Applications. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2021, 140, 106172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Oliveira, G.; Gonçalves, I.; Barra, A.; Nunes, C.; Ferreira, P.; Coimbra, M.A. Coffee Silverskin and Starch-Rich Potato Washing Slurries as Raw Materials for Elastic, Antioxidant, and UV-Protective Biobased Films. Food Res. Int. 2020, 109733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Wu, C.S. Renewable Resource-Based Green Composites of Surface-Treated Spent Coffee Grounds and Polylactide: Characterisation and Biodegradability. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2015, 121, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Moustafa, H.; Guizani, C.; Dupont, C.; Martin, V.; Jeguirim, M.; Dufresne, A. Utilization of Torrefied Coffee Grounds as Reinforcing Agent to Produce High-Quality Biodegradable PBAT Composites for Food Packaging Applications. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 1906–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Lessa, E.F.; Nunes, M.L.; Fajardo, A.R. Chitosan/Waste Coffee-Grounds Composite: An Efficient and Eco-Friendly Adsorbent for Removal of Pharmaceutical Contaminants from Water. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 189, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Gazonato, E.C.; Maia, A.A.D.; Da Silva Moris, V.A.; De Paiva, J.M.F. Thermomechanical Properties of Corn Starch Based Film Reinforced with Coffee Ground Waste as Renewable Resource. Mater. Res. 2019, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Thiagamani, S.M.K.; Nagarajan, R.; Jawaid, M.; Anumakonda, V.; Siengchin, S. Utilization of Chemically Treated Municipal Solid Waste (Spent Coffee Bean Powder) as Reinforcement in Cellulose Matrix for Packaging Applications. Waste Manag. 2017, 69, 445–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Cataldo, V.A.; Cavallaro, G.; Lazzara, G.; Milioto, S.; Parisi, F. Coffee Grounds as Filler for Pectin: Green Composites with Competitive Performances Dependent on the UV Irradiation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 170, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Mendes, J.F.; Martins, J.T.; Manrich, A.; Sena Neto, A.R.; Pinheiro, A.C.M.; Mattoso, L.H.C.; Martins, M.A. Development and Physical-Chemical Properties of Pectin Film Reinforced with Spent Coffee Grounds by Continuous Casting. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 210, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Iriondo-DeHond, A.; Martorell, P.; Genovés, S.; Ramón, D.; Stamatakis, K.; Fresno, M.; Molina, A.; del Castillo, M. Coffee Silverskin Extract Protects against Accelerated Aging Caused by Oxidative Agents. Molecules 2016, 21, 721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Costa, A.S.G.; Alves, R.C.; Vinha, A.F.; Costa, E.; Costa, C.S.G.; Nunes, M.A.; Almeida, A.A.; Santos-Silva, A.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P. Nutritional, Chemical and Antioxidant/pro-Oxidant Profiles of Silverskin, a Coffee Roasting by-Product. Food Chem. 2018, 267, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ouarhim, W.; Zari, N.; Bouhfid, R.; Qaiss, A.E.K. Mechanical performance of natural fibers-based thermosetting composites. In Mechanical and Physical Testing of Biocomposites, Fibre-Reinforced Composites and Hybrid Composites; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 43–60. ISBN 9780081022924. [Google Scholar]
  104. Choo, M.Y.; Oi, L.E.; Ling, T.C.; Ng, E.P.; Lee, H.V.; Juan, J.C. Conversion of microalgae biomass to biofuels. In Microalgae Cultivation for Biofuels Production; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 149–161. ISBN 9780128175361. [Google Scholar]
  105. Dyjakon, A.; Noszczyk, T.; Smędzik, M. The Influence of Torrefaction Temperature on Hydrophobic Properties of Waste Biomass from Food Processing. Energies 2019, 12, 4609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Jaisan, C.; Punbusayakul, N. Development of Coffee Pulp Extract-Incorporated Chitosan Film and Its Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities. Asia Pac. J. Sci. Technol. 2016, 21, 140–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Collazo-Bigliardi, S.; Ortega-Toro, R.; Chiralt, A. Using Lignocellulosic Fractions of Coffee Husk to Improve Properties of Compatibilised Starch-PLA Blend Films. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2019, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Sung, S.H.; Chang, Y.; Han, J. Development of Polylactic Acid Nanocomposite Films Reinforced with Cellulose Nanocrystals Derived from Coffee Silverskin. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 169, 495–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Ballesteros, L.F.; Cerqueira, M.A.; Teixeira, J.A.; Mussatto, S.I. Production and Physicochemical Properties of Carboxymethyl Cellulose Films Enriched with Spent Coffee Grounds Polysaccharides. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 106, 647–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Chang, Y.C.; Chen, Y.; Ning, J.; Hao, C.; Rock, M.; Amer, M.; Feng, S.; Falahati, M.; Wang, L.J.; Chen, R.K.; et al. No Such Thing as Trash: A 3D-Printable Polymer Composite Composed of Oil-Extracted Spent Coffee Grounds and Polylactic Acid with Enhanced Impact Toughness. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 15304–15310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Cacciotti, I.; Mori, S.; Cherubini, V.; Nanni, F. Eco-Sustainable Systems Based on Poly(Lactic Acid), Diatomite and Coffee Grounds Extract for Food Packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 112, 567–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Ounkaew, A.; Kasemsiri, P.; Kamwilaisak, K.; Saengprachatanarug, K.; Mongkolthanaruk, W.; Souvanh, M.; Pongsa, U.; Chindaprasirt, P. Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA)/Starch Bioactive Packaging Film Enriched with Antioxidants from Spent Coffee Ground and Citric Acid. J. Polym. Environ. 2018, 26, 3762–3772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Trongchuen, K.; Ounkaew, A.; Kasemsiri, P.; Hiziroglu, S.; Mongkolthanaruk, W.; Wannasutta, R.; Pongsa, U.; Chindaprasirt, P. Bioactive Starch Foam Composite Enriched With Natural Antioxidants from Spent Coffee Ground and Essential Oil. Starch Stärke 2018, 70, 1700238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Murthy, P.S.; Naidu, M.M. Recovery of Phenolic Antioxidants and Functional Compounds from Coffee Industry By-Products. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2012, 5, 897–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Naveed, M.; Hejazi, V.; Abbas, M.; Kamboh, A.A.; Khan, G.J.; Shumzaid, M.; Ahmad, F.; Babazadeh, D.; FangFang, X.; Modarresi-Ghazani, F.; et al. Chlorogenic Acid (CGA): A Pharmacological Review and Call for Further Research. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 97, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Ibrahim, S.A.; Salameh, M.M.; Phetsomphou, S.; Yang, H.; Seo, C.W. Application of Caffeine, 1,3,7-Trimethylxanthine, to Control Escherichia Coli O157:H7. Food Chem. 2006, 99, 645–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Chinga-Carrasco, G. Cellulose Fibres, Nanofibrils and Microfibrils: The Morphological Sequence of MFC Components from a Plant Physiology and Fibre Technology Point of View. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2011, 6, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Islam, M.N.; Rahman, F. Production and modification of nanofibrillated cellulose composites and potential applications. In Green Composites for Automotive Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 115–141. ISBN 9780081021774. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of coffee cherry structure and coffee processing-derived by-products. The percentages refer to the amount of each by-product obtained from fresh coffee cherries.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of coffee cherry structure and coffee processing-derived by-products. The percentages refer to the amount of each by-product obtained from fresh coffee cherries.
Foods 10 00683 g001
Figure 2. Strategies for reusing coffee by-products in the development of plastic-based formulations: (1) the use of crude coffee by-products as functional additives for plastics; or (2) the use of coffee by-products-derived extracts with film-forming ability or functional properties.
Figure 2. Strategies for reusing coffee by-products in the development of plastic-based formulations: (1) the use of crude coffee by-products as functional additives for plastics; or (2) the use of coffee by-products-derived extracts with film-forming ability or functional properties.
Foods 10 00683 g002
Table 1. Chemical composition of coffee by-products.
Table 1. Chemical composition of coffee by-products.
CompositionPulp
(CP)
Mucilage
(CM)
Parchment
(CPm)
Husks
(CH)
Silverskin
(CS)
Spent Coffee Grounds (SCG)
Moisture
(% wt)
78–81[31,35]84[41]9[42]13–15[29,43]4–7[34,44,45,46]61[47]
Component (% dry wt basis)
Free sugars5[36]NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
Cellulose36 8[48]12[49]28[50]24[51]16[47]
Hemicelluloses9 18 35 25 16 50
33% GM
17% AG
Pectic polysaccharides21 30 NDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
GalA (%)80[37]52[52]
DE (%)63 85
DA (%)6 6
Mw (g mol−1)400,000 12,000[48]
Total carbohydrates71 *ND56 *ND47 *ND53 *ND40[51]66[47]
LigninNDNDNDND32[49]38[50]29 NDND
MelanoidinsNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND5[34]16[47]
Protein9 **[36]17[48]NDND8–11 **[29,53]19 **[34,44,45,51]5
Lipids0.8 NDNDNDND1–3 2–5 13–15[47,54]
AshND NDND1[55]3–7[29,55]5–7 2[56]
Caffeine1[36]NDND0.13[42]1[29,53]1[57]0.01–0.5
Total phenolics
(% w/w GAE)
0.3 NDND0.2 1[58]2 1–2
AG: arabinogalactans; DA: degree of acetylation; DE: degree of methyl esterification; GAE: gallic acid equivalents; GalA: Galacturonic acid; GM: galactomannans; Mw: Molecular weight; ND: Not determined. * Estimated from the sum of cellulose, hemicelluloses, pectic polysaccharides, and free sugars of each coffee by-product. ** Protein content may be overestimated due to the presence of other nitrogenous compounds in the same composition.
Table 2. Functional additives for nonbiodegradable plastic formulations using crude coffee by-products.
Table 2. Functional additives for nonbiodegradable plastic formulations using crude coffee by-products.
By-ProductCoffee-Based PowderPolymeric MatrixDeveloped Materials and Main PropertiesRef
CHCH powderPPComposites with poor interfacial adhesion between CH and the polymeric matrix[71]
PP (plus maleic anhydride grafted PP)Composites with good interfacial adhesion[72]
HDPE (plus maleic anhydride grafted PE)Composites with good interfacial adhesion[73]
PP (plus maleic anhydride grafted PP)Composites with decreased susceptibility towards fire[74]
PP (plus maleic anhydride grafted PP)Composites with decreased carbon footprint[75]
CH powder alkali treatedPPComposites with improved mechanical and thermal performance[76]
CSCS powderHDPEComposites with poor interfacial adhesion between CS and the polymeric matrix[77]
CS powder alkali treated and esterified with palmitoyl chlorideHDPEComposites with decreased water absorption[77]
SCGSCG powderPPComposites with poor interfacial adhesion between SCG and the polymeric matrix[78]
SCG powder treated by oil removalPP (plus maleic anhydride grafted PP)Composites with increase interfacial adhesion, compatibility, and water resistance[79]
SCG powder esterified with palmitoyl chloridePPComposites with better particle dispersion and decreased water uptake[80]
SCG powder alkali treated and bleachedPP (plus silane and styrene-ethylene-butene-styrene-graft-maleic anhydride)Composites with improved interfacial adhesion and mechanical properties[81]
SCG powder treated by acid hydrolysisPEAntioxidant films with improved biocompatibility[82]
CH: coffee husks; CS: coffee silverskin; HDPE: high-density polyethylene; PE: polyethylene; PP: polypropylene; SCG: spent coffee grounds.
Table 3. Functional additives for biodegradable materials formulations using crude coffee by-products.
Table 3. Functional additives for biodegradable materials formulations using crude coffee by-products.
By-ProductCoffee-Based PowderPolymeric MatrixDeveloped Materials and Main PropertiesRef
CHCH powderPCLFilms with increased biodegradation rate[86]
CH powder treated with (3-glycidoxypropyl)trimethoxysilanePBATComposites with increased hydrophobicity, stiffness, and reduced production cost[87]
Torrefied CH powder PLAInjection specimens with increased mechanical resistance and thermal stability[88]
CH and CPmCH and CPm powderPHBComposites with increased thermal stability and water absorption[89]
CSCS powderPBAT and P(3HB-co-3HV)Composites with antioxidant activity[90]
CS powder treated with (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilanePBAT and P(3HB-co-3HV)Composites with antioxidant activity and increased interfacial adhesion[91]
CS powderP(3HB-co-3HV)Composites possessing an overall migration below the limit required for food packaging materials[92]
CS powderPotato starchAntioxidant and UV-protective films with increased elasticity, stretchability, and water resistance[93]
SCGSCG powder treated with tetraethyl orthosilicateMaleic-anhydride-grafted PLA formulationHomogeneous composites with increased water resistance and biodegradability[94]
Torrefied SCG powderPBATComposites with increased hydrophobicity[95]
SCG powderPVA (plus chitosan)Homogeneous composites suitable for the adsorption of pharmaceuticals contaminants from water[96]
Corn starchFilms with increased tensile strength[97]
CellulosePhotosensitive films[98]
PectinFilms with increased water resistance[99,100]
CH: coffee husks; CPm: coffee parchment; CS: coffee silverskin; P(3HB-co-3HV): poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate); PBAT: polybutylene adipate terephthalate; PCL: polycaprolactone; PHB: polyhydroxybutyrate; PLA: polylactic acid; PVA: polyvinyl alcohol; SCG: spent coffee grounds.
Table 4. Coffee by-products used as a source of extracts with film-forming ability or with functional properties for biodegradable materials formulations.
Table 4. Coffee by-products used as a source of extracts with film-forming ability or with functional properties for biodegradable materials formulations.
By-ProductCoffee-Based MoleculesPolymeric MatrixDeveloped Materials and Main PropertiesRef
CPPhenolic-rich extractChitosanFilms with increased water resistance, antioxidant, and antimicrobial properties[108]
CMPectic polysaccharidesPectic polysaccharidesBiodegradable films with rigidity and water insolubility[52]
CPmPhenolic-rich extractGellan gumFilms with improved antifungal properties[42]
CHAntioxidant and antibacterial aqueous extractCorn starchAntioxidant and antibacterial films with increased tensile strength and decreased water vapor and oxygen permeability[58]
Cellulose fibersCorn starchFilms with increased stiffness[58]
Antioxidant and antibacterial aqueous extractCorn starch/PLAAntioxidant films with decreased oxygen permeability[111]
Cellulose nanocrystalsCorn starch/PLAFilms with increased tensile strength and decreased gas permeabilities[111]
CSCellulose nanocrystalsPLAFilms with increased tensile strength and decreased gas permeability[117]
SCGPolysaccharide-rich extractCarboxymethyl celluloseActive brown films with increased light barrier, hydrophobicity, and tensile resistance[118]
OilPLAComposites with increased toughness suitable for 3D-printing applications[106]
Fatty acids-rich extractPLA (plus diatomite)Films with increased interfacial adhesion and decreased oxygen permeability[107]
Phenolic-rich extractPVA/cassava starchAntioxidant, antimicrobial, and antibacterial films[112]
Cassava starchAntioxidant, antimicrobial, and antibacterial films[113]
Polysaccharide-rich extractGalactomannansHeterogeneous films with light-brownish coloration[64]
Galactomannans-rich extractGalactomannansHeterogeneous and rigid films with light-brownish coloration[65]
CH: coffee husks; CM: coffee mucilage; CP: coffee pulp; CPm: coffee parchment; CS: coffee silverskin; PLA: polylactic acid; PVA: polyvinyl alcohol; SCG: spent coffee grounds.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oliveira, G.; Passos, C.P.; Ferreira, P.; Coimbra, M.A.; Gonçalves, I. Coffee By-Products and Their Suitability for Developing Active Food Packaging Materials. Foods 2021, 10, 683. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10030683

AMA Style

Oliveira G, Passos CP, Ferreira P, Coimbra MA, Gonçalves I. Coffee By-Products and Their Suitability for Developing Active Food Packaging Materials. Foods. 2021; 10(3):683. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10030683

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oliveira, Gonçalo, Cláudia P. Passos, Paula Ferreira, Manuel A. Coimbra, and Idalina Gonçalves. 2021. "Coffee By-Products and Their Suitability for Developing Active Food Packaging Materials" Foods 10, no. 3: 683. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10030683

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop