Next Article in Journal
The Role of Snack Choices, Body Weight Stereotypes and Smoking Behavior in Assessing Risk Factors for Adolescent Overweight and Obesity
Next Article in Special Issue
Antimicrobial Activity and Chemical Characterization of a Non-Polar Extract of Saffron Stamens in Food Matrix
Previous Article in Journal
Veterinary Drug Residues in Animal-Derived Foods: Sample Preparation and Analytical Methods
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nutritional and Antioxidant Potential of Fiddleheads from European Ferns
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 10
Issue 3
10.3390/foods10030556
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of Recombinant Kpkt Cytotoxicity on HaCaT Cells: Further Steps towards the Biotechnological Exploitation Yeast Killer Toxins

by
Gavino Carboni
1,2,
Ivana Marova
2,*,
Giacomo Zara
1,
Severino Zara
1,
Marilena Budroni
1 and
Ilaria Mannazzu
1,*
1
Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Viale Italia 39, 07100 Sassari, Italy
2
Faculty of Chemistry, Brno University of Technology, Purkyňova 464/118, Královo Pole, 61200 Brno, Czech Republic
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2021, 10(3), 556; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10030556
Submission received: 20 January 2021 / Revised: 24 February 2021 / Accepted: 28 February 2021 / Published: 8 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Compounds as Novel Sources of Antimicrobial and Antioxidative Agents in Food)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The soil yeast Tetrapisispora phaffii secretes a killer toxin, named Kpkt, that shows β-glucanase activity and is lethal to wine spoilage yeasts belonging to Kloeckera/Hanseniaspora, Saccharomycodes and Zygosaccharomyces. When expressed in Komagataella phaffii, recombinant Kpkt displays a wider spectrum of action as compared to its native counterpart, being active on a vast array of wine yeasts and food-related bacteria. Here, to gather information on recombinant Kpkt cytotoxicity, lyophilized preparations of this toxin (LrKpkt) were obtained and tested on immortalized human keratinocyte HaCaT cells, a model for the stratified squamous epithelium of the oral cavity and esophagus. LrKpkt proved harmless to HaCaT cells at concentrations up to 36 AU/mL, which are largely above those required to kill food-related yeasts and bacteria in vitro (0.25–2 AU/mL). At higher concentrations, it showed a dose dependent effect that was comparable to that of the negative control and therefore could be ascribed to compounds, other than the toxin, occurring in the lyophilized preparations. Considering the dearth of studies regarding the effects of yeast killer toxins on human cell lines, these results represent a first mandatory step towards the evaluation the possible risks associated to human intake. Moreover, in accordance with that observed on Ceratitis capitata and Musca domestica, they support the lack of toxicity of this toxin on non-target eukaryotic models and corroborate the possible exploitation of killer toxins as natural antimicrobials in the food and beverages industries.

1. Introduction

Yeast killer toxins are proteins, often glycoproteins, which recognize specific receptors on the surface of their sensitive targets and kill them through different modes of action. According to Klassen et al. [1] about 100 yeast killer species have been described so far. The spectrum of action of yeast killer toxins covers spoilage microorganisms significant for the fermentative [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12] and food and feed industries [13,14], but it also encompasses microbial pathogens of clinical interest [15,16,17,18], and plant pathogens [19,20,21]. Thus, yeast killer toxins have a wide range of possible applications as natural antimicrobials in the agri-food industry, as well as therapeutic agents for animal and human infections and for biological control of plant pathogens [22,23,24]. However, although a number of inventions regarding killer toxins application have been patented so far, their exploitation at the industrial level never took off [24]. The wine sector represents an exception in this sense. Here, the direct inoculation of yeast killer strains is admitted and recommended to ensure the dominance of the inoculated starter [5] and numerous commercial starters for oenology are killer strains of S. cerevisiae. Indeed, the effectiveness of S. cerevisiae killer strains in wine depends on several factors as reported by [5] and their dominance is not obvious also considering the narrowness of their spectrum of action. On the contrary non-Saccharomyces yeast killer toxins have a broader spectrum of action and some of them are active on spoilage yeasts of relevance for the wine industry [24,25].
One of these toxins, naturally secreted by the yeast Tetrapisispora phaffii and known as Kpkt, is effective on wine yeasts ascribed to the genera Kloeckera/Hanseniaspora, Saccharomycodes, and Zygosaccharomyces [4]. Further works showed that Kpkt interacts with β-1,3 and β-1,6 branched glucans [7], and that it affects the ultrastructure of the cell wall of the sensitive yeasts due to its β-glucanase activity [7,26]. Accordingly, TpBGL2 gene, that codes for Kpkt, shows more than 75% identity with β-1,3-glucanase encoding genes of other yeasts species and T. phaffii loses killer and β-glucanase activities following TpBGL2 gene deletion [27]. Interestingly, Kpkt retains killer activity under winemaking conditions for up to two weeks [28], thus suggesting its possible exploitation in the wine industry in place of SO2 [28]. Indeed, K. phaffii DBVPG 6076 is a soil isolate, not suitable for direct inoculation in grape must. Moreover, it secretes finite amounts of Kpkt thus hampering the large scale production of the toxin in view of its direct utilization in the wine industry. For that, the heterologous production of Kpkt was obtained in Komagataella phaffii GS115 (formerly Pichia pastoris) [29]. This is a GRAS host for the production of heterologous proteins that find application in the food and biopharmaceutical industries [30]. More recently, Carboni et al. [18] produced a lyophilized preparation of recombinant Kpkt that displays killer activity on a vast array of wine yeasts, among which Dekkera/Brettanomyces sp., but also on Gram positive (Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus plantarum, Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes) and Gram-negative bacteria (Salmonella bongori, and Escherichia coli) [18]. Thus, the lower specificity of action of recombinant Kpkt (rKpkt), as compared to native Kpkt, and its availability in the form of a manageable ready-to-use compound, suggest a plethora of possible applications for rKpkt in the wine, sweet beverage and more in general the food industries.
Indeed, similar to other putative natural antimicrobials, yeast killer toxins suffer of the dearth of information regarding their toxicity on non-target eukaryotic models. According to Pfeiffer et al. [31] no effect of S. cerevisiae killer toxin was observed on animal model systems. Similarly, recombinant and native Kpkt proved harmless on Ceratitis capitata and Musca domestica, two insect species recently utilized as non-mammalian eukaryotic models [18]. Conversely, Pettoello-Mantovani et al. [32], hypothesized that the killer toxin produced by Hansenula anomala is involved in the onset of H. anomala-induced enteritis.
Here, in order to gather information on recombinant Kpkt cytotoxicity, the effect of a lyophilized preparation of rKpkt was evaluated on human keratinocyte HaCaT cells, a model for the stratified squamous epithelium of the oral cavity and esophagus [33]. Particularly, keratinocytes are exposed to molecules present in ingested foods and have already been used to assess the cytotoxicity of antimicrobials among which nisin, chitosan, bronopol, chlorhexidine, and others [34,35].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Microorganisms, Cloning Vectors, and Growth Media

Microorganisms used are reported in Table 1. Recombinant clone 17 (rc#17) was obtained by transforming K. phaffii GS115 with pPIC9TpIMHisTag. This vector, provided by DNA 2.0 (Menlo Park, CA, USA), contains a codon optimized Kpkt coding sequence (TpIM) under the control of AOX1 promoter and downstream S. cerevisiae α leader sequence of secretion [29], and carries a HisTag in C terminus. Transformation and screening of transformants were carried out as already described [29].
Culture media were the following. YEPD: 2% glucose, 1% yeast extract and 2% peptone; BMGY: 1% glycerol (w/v), 1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 1.34% YNB w/o aminoacids and 0.00004% biotin; BMGluY: as BMGY with 1% glucose instead of glycerol; BMMY: 0.5 or 1% methanol (v/v), 1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 1.34% YNB w/o aminoacids and 0.00004% biotin. All media were buffered at pH 4.5 with citrate-phosphate buffer (0.1 M citric acid, 0.2 M Na2HPO4).
Yeasts were kept on YEPD at 4 °C and in YEPDgly (YEPD with addition of 40% glycerol) at −80 °C for short and long-term storage, respectively.

2.2. Production of Native and Recombinant Kpkt in Flask and Bioreactor

Baffled flask production of recombinant Kpkt (rKpkt) and bioreactor productions of native and recombinant Kpkt were carried out as already described [18] with significant modifications. In particular, for rc#17 and rc#24 bioreactor cultivation, two methanol feeding strategies were utilized in methanol fed batch phase: the dissolved oxygen (DO) strategy and methanol continuous feeding. According to the DO strategy, methanol feeding rate is in cascade with the dissolved oxygen level. For methanol continuous feeding, methanol feeding rate is taken to ~7.3 mL/L/h after 1 h and to ~10.9 mL/L/h after 2 more h. Methanol fed batch phase lasted approximately 72 h after which the culture broth was harvested by centrifugation (5000× g for 10 min) and the cell-free supernatant was subjected to micro-filtration (0.45 µm filter Minisart, Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany) and well plate assay, as already reported [29].

2.3. Cell-Free Supernatant Ultrafiltration and Lyophilization

Cell-free supernatants of rc#17, rc#24, and T. phaffii DBVPG6076 were concentrated by means of a TFF/Cross Flow System (Repligen, Waltham, MA, USA) with a 10 KDa cut-off membrane and 60-fold concentrated samples were lyophilized as already described [18]. The lyophilized preparations were solubilized in sterile distilled water (100 mg/mL) and total protein content was measured according to Bradford [36] while killer toxin concentration was evaluated by well plate assay.

2.4. Well Plate Assay for the Evaluation of Killer Activity and the Determination of Killer Toxin Concentration

One hundred μL of a cell suspension of the sensitive strain in sterile distilled water (OD600 0.1–0.2) was distributed on YEPD plates and 100 μL aliquots of the sample to be tested were filled into wells cut into the plate. Killer activity was recorded based on the appearance of an inhibition halo around the well after 3 days of incubation at 25 °C. rc#24 was used as the negative control of killer activity. Killer toxin concentration was expressed as arbitrary units (AU) [4]. Briefly: 10, 15, 25, 50, and 75 µL of cell-free supernatant taken to 100 µL with citrate phosphate buffer (pH 4.5), and 100 µL of cell-free supernatant, were subjected to well plate assay. The diameters of the inhibition halos around each well were measured (mm) after 3 days of incubation at 25 °C. The Log of toxin concentration and the diameters of the inhibition halos were reported on the abscissa and on the ordinate of a Cartesian axes system, respectively. Given the linear relationship between the Log of toxin concentrations and the diameters of the inhibition halos, it was established that 1 AU corresponds to the toxin concentration in 100 μL that results in an inhibition halo of 20 mm (included the diameter of the well).

2.5. Evaluation of β-Glucanase Activity

β-glucanase activity was evaluated according to Notario [37]. Briefly, 800 μL of 0.25% laminarin solubilized in 50 mM sodium acetate (pH 5.0, with glacial acetic acid) was added to 200 μL of the sample to be tested. After 30 min incubation at 37 °C the mixtures were boiled for 5 min to stop the reaction. Laminarinase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) (0.01 U in 1-mL reaction mixture) was utilized as positive control of activity. Negative controls of enzymatic activity for LrKpkt and LnKpkt were lyophilized preparations of 60-fold concentrated cell-free supernatant of rc#24 and heat-treated cell-free supernatant of T. phaffii DBVPG 6076, respectively. GAGO-20 kit (Sigma-Aldrich) was utilized to quantify the glucose released. Results presented are means ± standard deviation of at least three technical replicates of three independent experiments.

2.6. Human Cell Line Toxicity Test

HaCaT cells were grown as a monolayer at 37 °C, under 5% CO2 on Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, Sigma Aldrich) liquid medium (pH 7.4) supplemented with 2 mM l-glutamine, 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and penicillin-streptomycin (100 U/mL–0.1 mg/mL). After 3 days, 3 × 104 cells/mL were aliquoted in 96-well plates and exposed to increasing concentrations of LrKpkt and LnKpkt (ranging from 0 to 72 AU). Lyophilized preparations of rc#24 and heat inactivated 60-fold concentrated cell-free supernatant of T. phaffii DBVPG 6076 were utilized as negative controls for LrKpkt and LnKpkt, respectively. After 24 h of incubation with the toxin, cells were observed under a bright field microscope to gather preliminary information on cell viability. Cell viability was determined by MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium (MTT) bromide] test (MTT Cell Growth Assay Kit, Sigma Aldrich). After 3 h incubation in MTT, 10% SDS was added to each well and OD562 was recorded to evaluate the percentage of viable cells in respect to the negative control. Results presented are mean ± standard deviation of at least three technical replicates of three independent experiments.

2.7. Data Analysis

Data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Tukey test was employed for post-hoc comparisons and the critical value for significance level (p) was set at 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using R-studio for Windows, version 10 (RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Scale up of Recombinant Kpkt Production

In previous works the heterologous production of the yeast killer toxin Kpkt in K. phaffii was obtained by transforming GS115 with vector pPIC9TpIM [18,29]. Here, considering that the utilization of Tag containing expression vectors may facilitate recombinant protein purification, pPIC9TpIMHisTag was utilized. The only recombinant clone showing killer activity among the 72 transformants that integrated the expression cassette (rc#17), was grown in bioreactor to obtain the production of rKpkt. Similar to that reported for rc#6 [18], fed batch bioreactor cultivation of rc#17 was organized into three phases. In particular, rc#17 was fed glucose or glycerol during the first two phases to obtain a high cell density and methanol during the third phase in order to induce the expression of Kpkt coding sequence under the control of AOX1 promoter [18,38,39,40,41,42,43]. Since both glucose and glycerol repress AOX1 promoter, no toxin production was detected on the two carbon sources during the first two phases of cultivation. However, rc#17 took on average 48 h on glucose and about 96 h on glycerol to reach the requested cell density (OD600 350–400). Thus, contrary to that observed for rc#6 [18], glucose proved better than glycerol in increasing biomass production rate prior to methanol induction. Based on that, although no differences in the amount of toxin produced at the end of the fermentation process were observed, glucose feeding was utilized for the first two stages. Regarding methanol feeding, since high concentrations of methanol are toxic to the yeast cells, besides the continuous feeding strategy, here also the dissolved oxygen (DO) strategy was applied. However, while no rKpkt production was observed when the DO strategy was utilized, methanol continuous feeding resulted in a time dependent accumulation of rKpkt in the supernatant. In particular, the cell-free supernatant of rc#17 contained 1.8 ± 0.04, 7.3 ± 0.02 and 14.1 ± 0.15 AU/mL of recombinant killer toxin after 24, 48 and 70 h, respectively. Interestingly the final concentration of rKpkt obtained in bioreactor was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that obtained after 120 h in baffled flask (11.0 ± 0.08 AU/mL). Bioreactor cultivation of T. phaffii DBVPG 6076 led to the production of 7.9 ± 0.09 AU/mL of native Kpkt (nKpkt). This concentration was significantly lower than that obtained with rc#17 (p < 0.001), thus confirming that heterologous expression of KpKt is crucial to increase Kpkt production.

3.2. Production of Lyophilized Preparations of Kpkt and Evaluation of Killer and β-Glucanase Activities

Similar to that reported by Carboni et al. [18], following the lyophilization of 40 mL of 60-fold concentrated cell-free supernatant of rc#17 and T. phaffii DBVPG 6076, the ready-to-use preparations of recombinant (LrKpkt) and native (LnKpkt) killer toxin, respectively, were produced. In particular, 3.46 g of LrKpkt containing 411 AU/g and 3.78 g of LnKpkt containing 353 AU/g were obtained. LrKpkt and LnKpkt confirmed differences in their spectrum of action [18,29] with LrKpkt being active also on D. bruxellensis (Figure 1).
Since Kpkt hydrolyses β-glucans, and considering that killer activity on yeast sensitive targets is clearly mediated by β-glucanase activity [26], both killer and enzymatic activities of the cell free supernatant, and of the 60-fold concentrated samples, were measured before and after lyophilization. Killer activities of native and recombinant Kpkt preparations were evaluated by means of the well plate assay. As reported in Figure 2, while the 60-fold concentrated samples showed higher killer activity due to the concentration of proteins with MW higher than 10 kDa, among which Kpkt, lyophilization resulted in the decrease of specific killer activity. Regarding β-glucanase activity, the cell free supernatants of rc#17 and T. phaffii DBVPG 6076 hydrolyzed laminarin, with specific activities of 4.04 ± 0.08 and 4.94 ± 0.15 μmol of glucose/mg protein/min, respectively, that were significantly (p < 0.001) higher than that of pure commercial β-glucanase (2.8 ± 0.11 μmol of glucose/mg protein/min). Indeed, similar to that observed for killer activity, β-glucanase activity showed a considerable increase in the 60-fold concentrated sample while significantly decreasing following lyophilization (p < 0.001) (Figure 3), in accordance with the interdependence of the two activities.

3.3. Cytotoxicity of rKpkt and nKpkt on HaCaT Cell Lines

In spite of the observed reduction in killer and β-glucanase activities, lyophilized preparations are characterized by longer shelf life and ease of management in respect to concentrated cell-free preparations [18]. For these reason LrKpkt and LnKpkt were utilized on human keratinocyte HaCaT cells. Lyophilized recombinant Kpkt, although proving killer on yeast targets, showed no significant effects on human keratinocytes HaCaT cells for concentrations up to 14 AU/mL (Figure 4). The main function of keratinocytes is to protect the inner environment from foreign pathogens and chemical agents, and to signal injury to the host. Thus, in accordance with the suggested safety of yeast killer toxin on animal systems [31], these results are compatible with the hypothesis that LrKpkt, at these concentrations, may not exert a potential health risk for human consumption. Higher concentrations of lyophilized preparations of killer toxins determined a dose dependent effect on HaCaT cells. However, residual cell viability was still beyond 60% for LrKpkt concentrations up to 36 AU/mL (Figure 4) that are largely above those requested to kill food-related yeasts and bacteria in vitro (ranging from 0.25 to 2 AU/mL) [18]. Moreover, no significant differences were observed between LrKpkt and its relevant negative control (LNC). Thus, the dose dependent decrease in residual cell viability could be due to compounds, either culture media components or yeast-produced compounds, other than the toxin, occurring in the lyophilized preparations and toxic to HaCaT cells. Remarkably, LrKpkt effect on HaCaT cells was comparable to that of LKpkt. Thus, despite the lower specificity of rKpkt spectrum of action, LrKpkt and LnKpkt showed no significant difference in the effect exerted on human cells.

4. Conclusions

While previous works proved the feasibility of recombinant Kpkt production in K. phaffii and the advantages of rKpkt lyophilization, the aim of this work was to gather information on recombinant Kpkt toxicity on human cells. In line with the evidence that each recombinant clone requires a customized set up of culture conditions, a specific protocol was tailored on rc#17 for the production of rKpkt. After having shown that recombinant Kpkt produced by rc#17 maintains its biological functions upon lyophilization, its effect on immortalized human keratinocyte HaCaT cells was tested and compared to that of its native counterpart. In vitro evaluation of native and recombinant Kpkt toxicity on HaCaT cells proved that both are harmless to this cell line at concentrations that are largely above those required to kill food-related yeasts and bacteria in vitro. In accordance with that already observed on Ceratitis capitata and Musca domestica, these results support the lack of toxicity of Kpkt on non-target eukaryotic models and corroborate the possible exploitation of yeast killer toxins as natural antimicrobials in the food and beverages industries. Moreover, considering the dearth of studies regarding the effects of yeast killer toxins on human cell lines, these results represent a first step towards the evaluation of the possible risks associated to human intake.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.M. (Ilaria Mannazzu) and I.M. (Ivana Marova); investigation, G.C.; resources, I.M. (Ilaria Mannazzu) and I.M. (Ivana Marova); data curation, G.C., S.Z., and G.Z.; writing—original draft preparation I.M. (Ilaria Mannazzu) and I.M. (Ivana Marova); writing—review and editing, I.M. (Ilaria Mannazzu), I.M. (Ivana Marova), M.B.; supervision, I.M. (Ilaria Mannazzu) and I.M. (Ivana Marova); funding acquisition, I.M. (Ilaria Mannazzu) and I.M. (Ivana Marova) All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by University of Sassari, “Fondo di Ateneo per la Ricerca 2019 (P.I I.Mannazzu)” and by Brno University of Technology, project Nr. FCH-S-20-6316. (P.I. I.Marova). G.C. PhD grant was supported by Italian Ministry of University and Research, program PON-RI (2014–2020) Azione I.1 “Dottorati innovativi con caratterizzazione Industriale” (PI I.Mannazzu).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Ethical Statement

HaCaT cell line was provided by the Faculty of Chemistry, Brno University of Technology, and in vitro cultivation and handling of cells were carried out at the cell culture facility of the same University.

References

  1. Klassen, R.; Schaffrath, R.; Buzzini, P.; Ganter, P.F. Antagonistic interactions and killer yeasts. In Yeasts in Natural Ecosystems: Ecology; Buzzini, P., Lachance, M.A., Yurkov, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 229–275. [Google Scholar]
  2. Van Vuuren, H.J.J.; Jacobs, C.J. Killer yeasts in the wine industry: A review. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1992, 43, 119–128. [Google Scholar]
  3. Todd, B.E.N.; Fleet, G.H.; Henscke, P.A. Promotion of autolysis through the interaction of killer and sensitive yeasts: Potential application in sparkling wine production. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2000, 51, 65–72. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ciani, M.; Fatichenti, F. Killer toxin of Kluyveromyces phaffii DBVPG 6076 as a biopreservative agent to control apiculate wine yeasts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 3058–3063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Pérez, F.; Ramírez, M.; Regodón, J.A. Influence of killer strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on wine fermentation. Antonie van Leewen 2001, 79, 393–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Comitini, F.; De Ingeniis, J.; Pepe, L.; Mannazzu, I.; Ciani, M. Pichia anomala and Kluyveromyces wickeramii killer toxins as new tools against Dekkera/Brettanomyces spoilage yeasts. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2004, 238, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Comitini, F.; Di Pietro, N.; Zacchi, L.; Mannazzu, I.; Ciani, M. Kluyveromyces phaffii killer toxin active against wine spoilage yeasts: Purification and characterization. Microbiology 2004, 150, 2535–2541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Velázquez, R.; Zamora, E.; Álvarez, M.L.; Hernández, L.M.; Ramírez, M. Effects of new Torulaspora delbrueckii killer yeasts on the must fermentation kinetics and aroma compounds of white table wine. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Ramírez, M.; Velázquez, R.; Maqueda, M.; Zamora, E.; López-Piñeiro, A.; Hernández, L.M. Influence of the dominance of must fermentation by Torulaspora delbrueckii on the malolactic fermentation and organoleptic quality of red table wine. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 238, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Villalba, M.L.; Sàez, J.S.; del Monaco, S.; Lopes, C.A.; Sangorrín, M.P. TdKT, a new killer toxin produced by Torulaspora delbrueckii effective against wine spoilage yeasts. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 217, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Velázquez, R.; Zamora, E.; Álvarez, M.L.; Ramírez, M. Using killer yeasts in the Torulaspora delbrueckii elaboration of base wine and traditional sparkling wine. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 289, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Villalba, M.L.; Mazzucco, M.B.; Lopes, C.A.; Ganga, M.A.; Sangorrín, M.P. Purification and characterization of Saccharomyces eubayanus killer toxin: Biocontrol effectiveness against wine spoilage yeasts. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 108714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Palpacelli, V.; Ciani, M.; Rosini, G. Activity of different ‘killer’ yeasts on strains of yeast species undesirable in the food industry. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1991, 68, 75–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lowes, K.F.; Shearman, C.A.; Payne, J.; MacKenzie, D.; Archer, D.B.; Merry, R.J.; Gasson, M.J. Prevention of yeast spoilage in feed and food by the yeast mycocin HMK. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 1066–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Seguy, N.; Cailliez, J.; Polonelli, L.; Dei-Cas, E.; Camus, D. Inhibitory effect of a Pichia anomala killer toxin on Pneumocystis carinii infectivity to the SCID mouse. Parasitol. Res. 1996, 82, 114–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Izgü, F.; Altinby, D. Killer toxins of certain yeast strains have potential growth inhibitory activity on gram-positive pathogenic bacteria. Microbios 1997, 89, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Theisen, S.; Molkenau, E.; Schmitt, M.J. Wicaltin, a new protein toxin secreted by the yeast Williopsis californica and its broad-spectrum antimycotic potential. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2000, 10, 547–550. [Google Scholar]
  18. Carboni, G.; Fancello, F.; Zara, G.; Zara, S.; Ruiu, L.; Marova, I.; Pinna, G.; Budroni, M.; Mannazzu, I. Production of a lyophilized ready-to-use yeast killer toxin with possible applications in the wine and food industries. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 335, 108883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Weiler, F.; Schmitt, M.J. Zygocin a secreted antifungal toxin of the yeast Zygosaccharomyces bailii and its effect on sensitive fungal cells. FEMS Yeast Res. 2003, 3, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Santos, A.; Sanchez, A.; Marquina, D. Yeasts as biological agents to control Botrytis cinerea. Microbiol. Res. 2004, 159, 331–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pérez, M.F.; Contreras, L.; Garnica, N.M.; Fernandez-Zenoff, F.V.; Farías, M.E.; Sepulveda, M.; Ramallo, J.; Dib, J.R. Native killer yeasts as biocontrol agents of postharvest fungal diseases in lemons. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0165590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Rosa-Magri, M.M.; Tauk-Tornisielo, S.M.; Ceccato-Antonini, S.R. Bioprospection of yeasts as biocontrol agents against phytopathogenic molds. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2011, 54, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Shaffrath, R.; Meinhardt, F.; Klassen, R. Yeast Killer toxins: Fundamentals and Applications. In Physiology and Genetics. The Mycota: A Comprehensive Treatise on Fungi as Experimental Systems for Basic and Applied Research; Anke, T., Schüffler, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 87–118. [Google Scholar]
  24. Mannazzu, I.; Domizio, P.; Carboni, G.; Zara, S.; Zara, G.; Comitini, F.; Budroni, M.; Ciani, M. Yeast killer toxins: From ecological significance to application. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2019, 39, 603–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Mehlomakulu, N.N.; Setati, M.E.; Divol, B. Non-Saccharomyces killer toxins: Possible biocontrol agents against Brettanomyces in wine? S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic. 2015, 36, 94–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Comitini, F.; Mannazzu, I.; Ciani, M. Tetrapisispora phaffii killer toxin is a highly specific β-glucanase that disrupts the integrity of the yeast cell wall. Microb. Cell Factories 2009, 8, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Oro, L.; Zara, S.; Fancellu, F.; Mannazzu, I.; Budroni, M.; Ciani, M.; Comitini, F. TpBGL2 codes for a Tetrapisispora phaffii killer toxin active against wine spoilage yeasts. FEMS Yeast Res. 2014, 14, 464–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Comitini, F.; Ciani, M. The zymocidial activity of Tetrapisispora phaffii in the control of Hanseniaspora uvarum during the early stages of winemaking. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 50, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Chessa, R.; Landolfo, S.; Ciani, M.; Budroni, M.; Zara, S.; Ustun, M.; Çakar, Z.P.; Mannazzu, I. Biotechnological exploitation of Tetrapisispora phaffii killer toxin: Heterologous production in Komagataella phaffii (Pichia pastoris). Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 2931–2942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ahmad, M.; Hirz, M.; Pichler, H.; Schwab, H. Protein expression in Pichia pastoris: Recent achievements and perspectives for heterologous protein production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 5301–5317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Pfeiffer, P.F.; Radler, G.; Caspritz, H.H. Effect of a killer toxin of yeast on eukaryotic systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1988, 54, 1068–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Pettoello-Mantovani, M.; Nocerino, A.; Polonelli, L.; Morace, G.; Conti, S.; Di Martino, L.; De Ritis, G.; Iafusco, M.; Guandalini, S. Hansenula anomala killer toxin induces secretion and severe acute injury in the rat intestine. Gastroenterology 1995, 109, 1900–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ross, M.H.; Pawlina, W. Histology: A Test and Atlas with Correlated. Cell and Molecular Biology, 7th ed.; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kitagawa, N.; Otani, T.; Inai, T. Nisin, a food preservative produced by Lactococcus lactis, affects the localization pattern of intermediate filament protein in HaCaT cells. Anat. Sci. Int. 2019, 94, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. López-García, J.; Lehocký, M.; Humpolíček, P.; Sáha, P. HaCaT keratinocytes response on antimicrobial atelocollagen substrates: Extent of cytotoxicity, cell viability and proliferation. J. Funct. Biomater. 2014, 5, 43–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein–dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Notario, V. β-glucanases from Candida albicans: Purification, characterization and the nature of their attachment to cell wall components. Microbiology 1982, 128, 747–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Zhang, W.; Inan, M.; Meagher, M.M. Fermentation strategies for recombinant protein expression in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2000, 5, 275–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Inan, M.; Meagher, M.M. Non-repressing carbon sources for alcohol oxidase (AOX1) promoter of Pichia pastoris. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2001, 92, 585–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Juturu, V.; Wu, J.C. Production of high concentration of l-lactic acid from oil palm empty fruit bunch by thermophilic Bacillus coagulans JI12. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2018, 65, 145–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, W.-C.; Inwood, S.; Gong, T.; Sharma, A.; Yu, L.-Y.; Zhu, P. Fed-batch high-cell-density fermentation strategies for Pichia pastoris growth and production. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2019, 39, 258–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sun, Q.; Chen, F.; Geng, F.; Luo, Y.; Gong, S.; Jiang, Z. A novel aspartic protease from Rhizomucor miehei expressed in Pichia pastoris and its application on meat tenderization and preparation of turtle peptides. Food Chem. 2018, 245, 570–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vina-Gonzalez, J.; Elbl, K.; Ponte, X.; Valero, F.; Alcalde, M. Functional expression of aryl-alcohol oxidase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia pastoris by directed evolution. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2018, 115, 1666–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Foods 10 00556 g001 550
Figure 1. Well plate assay of lyophilized preparations of recombinant (LrKpkt) and native (LnKpkt) Kpkt. D. bruxellensis DiSVA 692 (A,C) and S. cerevisiae DBVPG 6500 (B,D) were utilized as sensitive strains.
Figure 1. Well plate assay of lyophilized preparations of recombinant (LrKpkt) and native (LnKpkt) Kpkt. D. bruxellensis DiSVA 692 (A,C) and S. cerevisiae DBVPG 6500 (B,D) were utilized as sensitive strains.
Foods 10 00556 g001
Foods 10 00556 g002 550
Figure 2. Specific killer activity of recombinant (A) and native (B) Kpkt. Killer toxin specific activity is expressed as AU/mg of protein. Results are means ± standard deviations of at least three independent experiments. Different letters indicate significantly different results (p < 0.001).
Figure 2. Specific killer activity of recombinant (A) and native (B) Kpkt. Killer toxin specific activity is expressed as AU/mg of protein. Results are means ± standard deviations of at least three independent experiments. Different letters indicate significantly different results (p < 0.001).
Foods 10 00556 g002
Foods 10 00556 g003 550
Figure 3. β-glucanase activity of recombinant (A) and native (B) Kpkt. β-glucanase activity is expressed as μmol of glucose/mg protein/min. Results are means ± standard deviations of at least three independent experiments. Different letters indicate significantly different results (p < 0.001).
Figure 3. β-glucanase activity of recombinant (A) and native (B) Kpkt. β-glucanase activity is expressed as μmol of glucose/mg protein/min. Results are means ± standard deviations of at least three independent experiments. Different letters indicate significantly different results (p < 0.001).
Foods 10 00556 g003
Foods 10 00556 g004 550
Figure 4. Viability of HaCaT cells after 24 h exposure to increasing concentrations of LrKpkt (A) and LnKpkt (B). Cell viability was determined in respect to positive controls (0 AU of LrKpkt or LnKpkt). LNC negative controls of killer activity. Results are means ± standard deviation of at least three independent experiments. Same superscript letters indicate results not significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Viability of HaCaT cells after 24 h exposure to increasing concentrations of LrKpkt (A) and LnKpkt (B). Cell viability was determined in respect to positive controls (0 AU of LrKpkt or LnKpkt). LNC negative controls of killer activity. Results are means ± standard deviation of at least three independent experiments. Same superscript letters indicate results not significantly different (p < 0.05).
Foods 10 00556 g004
Table
Table 1. Microbial strains utilized in the present work.
Table 1. Microbial strains utilized in the present work.
StrainSourceCharacteristic
Tetrapisispora phaffii 6076DBVPGNative producer of Kpkt
Komagataella phaffii GS115InvitrogenHost for heterologous expression, his4
Saccharomyces cerevisiae 6500DBVPGSensitive to Kpkt and rKpkt
Dekkera bruxellensis 692DiSVASensitive to rKpkt
Komagataella phaffii rc#24UNISSnegative control of killer activity [29]
Komagataella phaffii rc#17This studypPIC9TpIMHisTag in GS115
UNISS: Microbial Culture Collection, Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy; DiSVA: Culture Collection of Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy. DBVPG; Industrial Yeast Collection DBVPG, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Carboni, G.; Marova, I.; Zara, G.; Zara, S.; Budroni, M.; Mannazzu, I. Evaluation of Recombinant Kpkt Cytotoxicity on HaCaT Cells: Further Steps towards the Biotechnological Exploitation Yeast Killer Toxins. Foods 2021, 10, 556. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10030556

AMA Style

Carboni G, Marova I, Zara G, Zara S, Budroni M, Mannazzu I. Evaluation of Recombinant Kpkt Cytotoxicity on HaCaT Cells: Further Steps towards the Biotechnological Exploitation Yeast Killer Toxins. Foods. 2021; 10(3):556. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10030556

Chicago/Turabian Style

Carboni, Gavino, Ivana Marova, Giacomo Zara, Severino Zara, Marilena Budroni, and Ilaria Mannazzu. 2021. "Evaluation of Recombinant Kpkt Cytotoxicity on HaCaT Cells: Further Steps towards the Biotechnological Exploitation Yeast Killer Toxins" Foods 10, no. 3: 556. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10030556

APA Style

Carboni, G., Marova, I., Zara, G., Zara, S., Budroni, M., & Mannazzu, I. (2021). Evaluation of Recombinant Kpkt Cytotoxicity on HaCaT Cells: Further Steps towards the Biotechnological Exploitation Yeast Killer Toxins. Foods, 10(3), 556. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10030556

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop