Next Article in Journal
Differences in Eating Quality Attributes between Japonica Rice from the Northeast Region and Semiglutinous Japonica Rice from the Yangtze River Delta of China
Next Article in Special Issue
A Novel Photoelectrochemical Aptamer Sensor Based on CdTe Quantum Dots Enhancement and Exonuclease I-Assisted Signal Amplification for Listeria monocytogenes Detection
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Structural, Physicochemical and Functional Properties of Dietary Fiber Extracted from Newhall Navel Orange By-Products
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preparation of Specific Nanobodies and Their Application in the Rapid Detection of Nodularin-R in Water Samples
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Highly Sensitive and Selective Fluorescent Probe Using MPA-InP/ZnS QDs for Detection of Trace Amounts of Cu2+ in Water

1
College of Electronic Information and Automation, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin 300222, China
2
Information Technology Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China
3
National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China
4
National Engineering Laboratory for Agri-Product Quality Traceability, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2021, 10(11), 2777; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112777
Submission received: 13 October 2021 / Revised: 5 November 2021 / Accepted: 8 November 2021 / Published: 11 November 2021

Abstract

:
Detection of copper (II) ions (Cu2+) in water is important for preventing them from entering the human body to preserve human health. Here, a highly sensitive and selective fluorescence probe that uses mercaptopropionic acid (MPA)-capped InP/ZnS quantum dots (MPA-InP/ZnS QDs) was proposed for the detection of trace amounts of Cu2+ in water. The fluorescence of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs can be quenched significantly in the presence of Cu2+, and the fluorescence intensity shows excellent linearity when the concentration of Cu2+ varies from 0–1000 nM; this probe also exhibits an extremely low limit of detection of 0.22 nM. Furthermore, a possible fluorescence-quenching mechanism was proposed. The MPA-InP/ZnS QDs probes were further applied to the detection of trace Cu2+ in real water samples and drink samples, showing good feasibility.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

As one of the essential trace elements for humans, Cu2+ plays an important role in many physiological processes, such as hemoglobin regulation, bone formation, and cell metabolism [1]. However, high concentrations of Cu2+ can affect the function of the kidney and liver and may cause brain diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease [2]. Even short-term exposure to high concentrations of Cu2+ can cause stomach and intestinal discomfort [3]. Cu2+ is taken up by humans through contaminated water and food and accumulates in the human body. To this end, the maximum residue levels of Cu2+ in water are clearly defined. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) stipulated that the maximum allowable amounts of Cu2+ in drinking water and in industrial effluents are 20 μM [4] and 1.3 mg/L [5], respectively. Therefore, detecting Cu2+ in water is of great significance for preventing Cu2+ from entering the human body and ensuring human health.
There are many methods for detecting Cu2+, such as atomic absorption spectrometry [6], inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) [7], inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) [8], electrochemical methods [9], and fluorescence methods [10]. Atomic absorption spectrometry, ICP-OES, and ICP-MS are highly accurate for the detection of Cu2+; however, the disadvantages of expensive equipment, cumbersome operation, and time consumption [11,12] make them unable to detect mobile Cu2+ in real time. Electrochemical methods have the advantages of low cost, simple operation, and portability; however, the electrodes have to be maintained due to the polarization effect [13]. Fluorescence methods have attracted increasing attention in the field of Cu2+ detection in recent years due to their high sensitivity, anti-interference ability, and fast response. In particular, with the development of fluorescent nanomaterials, Cu2+ fluorescent strategies with simple and environmentally friendly designs have attracted increasing interest [14,15].
Quantum dots (QDs) are widely used in the detection of Cu2+ in water due to their advantages of simple preparation, stable optical performance, adjustable emission, and surface modification [16]. Sadeghi et al. [17] developed a fluorescent probe based on CdSe QDs capped with deep eutectic solvent (DES-CdSe QDs) to determine the levels of Cu2+ in various drinks based on aggregation-induced emission (AIE), but CdSe QDs are poisonous and environmentally unfriendly, which limits the application of the method. Carbon dots (CDs) are some of most popular QDs in the detection of Cu2+ [18]. The fluorescence of CDs can be quenched in the presence of Cu2+ based on the complexation reaction of Cu2+ with the oxygen-containing functional groups on the surface of the CDs. Although CDs have the advantages of simple synthesis, low price, and nontoxicity, some metal ions that could be present in the water, such as iron ions and mercury ions, can also quench the fluorescence of the CDs [19,20], which can interfere with the detection of Cu2+. Therefore, in real environmental samples, eliminating the influence of potential interfering substances to detect Cu2+, even in trace amounts and with highly sensitive methods, is one of the main challenges.
In this work, we synthesized 3-mercaptopropionic acid (MPA)-capped InP/ZnS QDs (MPA-capped InP/ZnS QDs) for the first time and developed a fluorescent probe based on MPA-InP/ZnS QDs for the detection of trace Cu2+ in water. With proper capping of MPA, the MPA-InP/ZnS QDs exhibit excellent monodispersity in aqueous media and are suitable for the highly selective detection of trace Cu2+. In the presence of Cu2+, the fluorescence of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs could be significantly quenched, the sensing performance was studied, and the possible mechanism was proposed. Furthermore, the probe was applied to the detection of Cu2+ in environmental water and drink samples. To the best of our knowledge, there are few reports on the use of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs to detect Cu2+ in water.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Instruments

Indium (III) iodide (InI3) (99.998%), zinc (II) chloride (ZnCl2) (≥98%), tris(diethylamino)-phosphine (C12H30N3P) (97%), 100 mesh selenium powder (99.99%), hydrochloric acid (HCI) (mass fraction, 36.46%), zinc stearate (C36H70O4Zn) (technical grade, 65%), trioctylphosphine (C24H51P) (>97%), octadecene (C18H36) (technical grade, 90%), chloroform (CHCI3) (≥99%), 3-mercaptopropionic acid (C3H6O2S) (MPA) (≥99%), tetramethylammonium hydroxide pentahydrate ((CH3)4N-OH·5H2O) (TMAH) (≥97%), sulfur powder, oleylamine (C18H37N) (mass fraction, 80–90%), citric acid (C₆H₈O₇) (≥99.5%), disodium hydrogen phosphate (Na2HPO4) (≥99%), and all of the soluble metal salts (NaCl, MgCl2, AlCl3, KCl, CaCl2, MnCl2, FeCl3, CoCl2, CuCl2, PbCl2, CdCl2, BaCl2, and AgNO3) were analytically pure and purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All chemical reagents were directly used without further purification. The distilled water used in all experiments had a conductivity of 1.37 (μs/cm) and a resistivity of 0.73 (MΩ/cm).
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) observations were carried out by using a transmission electron microscope (JEOL, JEM-2100, Akishima, Japan). Fourier-transform infrared spectra (FT-IR) were obtained by FT-IR spectroscopy (Tianjin Jiangdong Company, FT-IR-650, Tianjin, China). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was recorded by using an XPS spectrometer (Japan Electronics, D/MAX, Tokyo, Japan). Additionally, the quantum yield (QY) was measured by using a fluorescence spectrometer (Horiba Jobin Yvon, Nanolog FL3-2 IHR, Pairs, France). The fluorescence spectra of the probes were recorded by using a fluorescence spectrometer (Edinburgh Instruments Ltd., Edinburgh FS5, Livingston, UK) at an excitation wavelength (λex) of 250 nm and an emission wavelength (λem) of 520 nm with an integration time of 0.1 s. Both the excitation and emission slits were set to a width of 5 nm. A time-resolved fluorescence spectrometer (Horiba Jobinyvon IBH Inc, Deltaflex 77-500K, Pairs, France) was used to measure the fluorescence lifetime of the probes with λex = 250 nm and λem = 520 nm. The ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectrum was scanned in the wavelength range of 190–1100 nm with a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Hach Company, DR6000, Loveland, USA) with a step size of 5 nm. A refrigerated centrifuge (Sigma, 3k15, Landkreis Osterode, Germany) was used for the pretreatment of samples. In addition, the pH was adjusted by an automatic acid-base titration apparatus (Mettler Toledo, Titration Excellence T9, Zurich, Switzerland), and the sample was sonicated by an ultrasonic cleaner (Kunshan Shumei, KQ-250DE, Kunshan, China).

2.2. Synthesis of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs

The MPA-InP/ZnS QDs were synthesized according to a previously reported procedure [21]. The solvothermal method was used to proceed with the MPA-InP/ZnS QDs. First, 100 mg of InI3 (0.45 mM) and 300 mg of ZnCl2 (2.2 mM) were added to 5.0 mL (15 mM) of technical oleylamine, which is a coordinating solvent at 120 °C, and stirred and degassed to react for one hour; then, 0.45 mL (1.6 mM) of tris(diethylamino)-phosphine (phosphorus:indium ratio = 3.6:1) was injected into the above mixture at 180 °C under inert atmosphere for 20 min to synthesize the InP nanocrystals. Subsequently, 1 mL of saturated TOP-S (2.2 M) was slowly injected into the solution of InP nanocrystals, and the temperature was raised to 200 °C after 40 min; 4 mL of ODE with 1 g Zn(stearate)2 was injected into the solution, and the temperature was increased to 220 °C after 60 min; 0.7 mL saturated TOP-S (2.2 M) was slowly injected into the solution, and the temperature was increased to 240 °C, and 2 mL of ODE with 0.5 g Zn(stearate)2 was injected into the solution in turn, and temperature was increased to 260 °C after 30 min and 60 min, respectively. At the end, the solution reacted at 260 °C for 30 min to form trioctyl phosphine oxide (TOPO)-capped InP/ZnS QDs.
To improve the monodispersion and optical properties in aqueous media, the InP/ZnS QDs were capped by MPA. One hundred milligrams of the organic base TMAH were mixed well vigorous shaking with 50 µL MPA in 1 mL of chloroform and allowed to stand for 1 h for MPA deprotonation. Then, the bottom organic phase containing deprotonated MPA was transferred into a polypropylene tube. Then, 100 µL of the TOPO-capped InP/ZnS QDs (0.1 µM in chloroform) was added to the polypropylene tube and mixed at room temperature for 40 h for the ligand-exchange reaction between TOPO and MPA. Finally, the product was washed with chloroform and ethanol 3 times to obtain MPA-InP/ZnS QDs.

2.3. Detection of Cu2+ Based on MPA-InP/ZnS QDs

Next, 100 μL of different concentrations of Cu2+ (0 nM, 3 nM, 5 nM, 10 nM, 15 nM, 20 nM, 30 nM, 50 nM, 100 nM, 150 nM, 200 nM, 250 nM, 300 nM, 400 nM, 600 nM, and 1000 nM) were added to 2 mL of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs PBS solution (14 nM, pH = 8.0) for 12 min incubation at room temperature, and the fluorescence spectra were recorded (λex = 250 nm). The calibration curves of the fluorescence intensity at the emission peak of 520 nm vs. the concentrations of Cu2+ were plotted.
The stability and selectivity of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs were investigated. The fluorescence intensity was recorded at indoor environment every day for 7 days at room temperature; different metal ions, including Na+, Mg2+, Al3+, K+, Ca2+, Co2+, Mn2+, Fe3+, Ba2+, Cd2+, Pb2+, and Ag+ (500 nM for each), were added to the MPA-InP/ZnS QDs solution, and the fluorescence intensity of each solution was recorded.
The probes were used for the detection of Cu2+ in the environmental water samples and drinking samples. In the spiked and real samples detection, 100 μL of samples were added to 2 mL of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs PBS solution (14 nM, pH = 8.0) for 12 min incubation at room temperature, and the fluorescence spectra were recorded (λex = 250 nm).
Samples 1–5 were mineral water of different brands, including Sample 1 (Uni-President; Tainan, China), Sample 2 (Jingtian Food & Beverage Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen, China), Sample 3 (Evergrande Mineral Water Group Co., Ltd.; Guangzhou, China), Sample 4 (Voss Beverage Co., Ltd.; Voss, Norway), and Sample 5 (Danone Co., Ltd.; Pairs, France); the carbonated drinks included Sample 6 (Coca-Cola; Atlanta, GA, USA) and Sample 7 (Pepsi; New York, NY, USA), and the drinking water Sample 8 (Beijing Xiangshan Tianquan Beverage Co., Ltd.; Beijing, China), all of which were purchased from the local market in Haidian District of Beijing. The river water samples (Sample 9) were obtained from the Jingmi Diversion Canal in Beijing. Tap water (Sample 10) was obtained in Haidian District of Beijing. The river water samples were centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 3 min to obtain the supernatant, which was filtered through a 0.45-μm filter membrane. The carbonated drink samples were pretreated by ultrasonic oscillation for 5 min. The Cu2+ of the samples were detected by ICP-MS method as comparisons [22] and all experiments were performed in triplicate. Unless otherwise specified, all experiments in this article were performed at room temperature.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs

As shown in Figure 1, the synthesized MPA-InP/ZnS QDs were spherical and well dispersed in water solution. The particle size of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs was distributed in a relatively narrow range of 1.87–5.86 nm, with an average size of 3.21 nm (inset in Figure 1a). The MPA-InP/ZnS QDs had an obvious lattice with a lattice spacing of 0.23 nm, as shown in Figure 1b, and the charge couple device (CCD) image revealed that InP/ZnS QDs have round shape and excellent light-emitting characteristics.
FT-IR spectra were obtained to investigate the functional groups on the surface of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs. As shown in Figure 2a, the FT-IR spectra of MPA (red curve) displays that the absorption bands at 3142 cm−1 and 1701 cm−1 are attributed to the stretching vibration of the O–H and the C=O of COOH, respectively. The FT-IR spectra of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs (black curve) shows the absorption band at 3396 cm−1 is attributed to the stretching vibration of the O–H band of COOH. The peaks at 1640, 1568, 1486, and 1396 cm−1 are caused by the stretching vibrations of the C=O, C–H, –NH, and –OH bonds, respectively. The presence of carboxyl hydroxyl and amine groups was demonstrated on the surface of the MPA-InP/ZnS QDs [23], which are beneficial to the homogenous and stable dispersion of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs in water [24] and indicating the InP/ZnS QDs are successfully capped by MPA. XPS spectra were recorded to investigate the surface elements of the MPA-InP/ZnS QDs. As shown in Figure 2b, the XPS spectrum of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs shows three peaks at 284.8, 402.4, and 532.0 eV, which correspond to the C1s, N1s, and O1s orbitals with relative atomic percentages of 73.96%, 5.01%, and 21.03%, respectively. The high-resolution C1s and O1s XPS spectra, as shown in Figure 2c,d, demonstrate the presence of C–C/C–H, C–O–H/C–O–N, O–H, and C=O, which agrees with the FT-IR spectra. The XPS spectra shows that the MPA-InP/ZnS QDs contain a large number of carboxyl groups, which further indicates that the InP/ZnS QDs are successfully capped by MPA.
The fluorescence excitation and emission spectra of the MPA-InP/ZnS QDs were obtained to investigate the fluorescence properties. As shown in Figure 3a, the MPA-InP/ZnS QDs show an emission wavelength at 520 nm with an excitation wavelength of 250 nm. The MPA-InP/ZnS QDs are pale yellow in daylight and exhibit strong yellow color under UV light (365 nm), as shown in the insert of Figure 3a. An obvious emission peak located at approximately 520 nm with excitation wavelength scanning from 200 nm to 300 nm can be observed in Figure 3b, indicating that the emission is independent of the excitation wavelength. The quantum yield of purified MPA-InP/ZnS QDs was measured by a fluorescence spectrometer with an integrating sphere to be 12.05%.

3.2. Detection of Cu2+ by Utilizing the MPA-InP/ZnS QDs

The influence of pH, the concentration of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs, and the reaction time were investigated to optimize the conditions of reaction conditions for the detection of Cu2+. As shown in Figure 4a, the ratio of the fluorescence quenching of the MPA-InP/ZnS QDs with Cu2+ (50 nM, 100 μL) added in PBS buffer at different pH values (2–10) was recorded, and the fluorescence was quenched most obviously at pH = 8.0. Thus, the value of 8.0 was used as the optimum pH. Figure 4b shows that the fluorescence intensity of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs at a concentration of 14 nM was the strongest, which means that the quenching degree may be the greatest in the presence of same concentration of Cu2+. In order to investigate this issue further, the fluorescence intensity of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs in the concentration of 6 nM, 10 nM, 14 nM, and 18 nM in the presence of different concentrations of Cu2+ were measured. As shown in Figure S1 of Supplementary Materials, in the concentrations of Cu2+ of 0–1000 nmol/L, the MPA-InP/ZnS QDs solution with a concentration of 14 nM has the greatest degree of fluorescence quenching. The results indicated that 14 nM is the best concentration. Furthermore, the time-based fluorescence behavior of the MPA-InP/ZnS QDs with added Cu2+ was studied, and it is shown in Figure 4c that the fluorescence was stable after 12 min. Therefore, we chose 12 min as the incubation time for the complete reaction of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs and Cu2+. All the following experiments were performed under the optimum conditions.
The fluorescence intensity of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs solutions with different concentrations of Cu2+ was measured at λex = 250 nm to explore the sensitivity in terms of detecting Cu2+ in water. Figure 5a shows a remarkable decrease in fluorescence intensity at 520 nm with increasing concentrations of Cu2+. The insets of Figure 5a shows photos of MPA-InP/ZnS QD solutions with different concentrations of Cu2+ irradiated by a UV lamp (365 nm). The color of the MPA-InP/ZnS QDs solution under UV light gradually changed from extremely bright yellow to pale yellow until colorless with increasing Cu2+ concentration. The Figure 5b shows a good linear relationship (R2 = 0.94) between the F0/F (F0 is the initial fluorescence intensity of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs, and F is the fluorescence intensity of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs after adding Cu2+) and concentration of Cu2+ in the range of 0–1000 nM. Moreover, the insert of Figure 5b shows that the fluorescence intensity of the MPA-InP/ZnS QDs at low concentrations of Cu2+ (0–50 nM) is quenched more rapidly, which means that the Cu2+ detection is extremely sensitive at low concentrations. In the concentration range of 0–50 nM, the calibration curve has better linearity (R2 = 0.99), and the limit of detection (LOD) of the prepared MPA-InP/ZnS QDs calculated by the Formula 3σ/x was 0.22 nM [18].
The stability and selectivity are important indicators for evaluating the practicability and feasibility of probes. Figure 6a shows that the changes in the fluorescence intensity of the MPA-InP/ZnS QDs solution at indoor environment are less than 8% within seven days, indicating the perfect stability of the MPA-InP/ZnS QDs probe. Furthermore, the influence of the potentially competing metal ions Na+, Mg2+, Al3+, K+, Ca2+, Co2+, Mn2+, Fe3+, Ba2+, Cd2+, Pb2+, and Ag+ (500 nM for each) was studied. As shown in Figure 6b, compared with Cu2+, only Ag+ and Fe3+ can quench the fluorescence of InP/ZnS QDs. The fluorescence-quenching degree of InP/ZnS QDs are 7.25% and 7.77% in the concentration of 500 nM of Ag+ and Fe3+, respectively. While in the presence of 50 nM Cu2+, the fluorescence-quenching degree of InP/ZnS QDs is 39.2%, indicating the fluorescence quenching of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs by other metal ions is almost negligible. The ion selectivity is dependent on the intrinsic affinity between the analyte and the surface ligands [25], and the MPA ligand has a high affinity constant with Cu2+ [26], which may be the reason of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs has higher selectivity to Cu2+ than other metal ions. These experimental results show the excellent sensitivity, high selectivity, and good anti-influence of the MPA-InP/ZnS QDs probe for the detection of trace Cu2+ in water.

3.3. Fluorescence-Quenching Mechanism of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs

The fluorescence-quenching mechanism of quantum dots is complicated, generally including inner filter effect (IFE), fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), photoinduced electron transfer (PET), static quenching effect (SQE), and dynamic quenching. The FRET, PET, and dynamic quenching can cause the fluorescence lifetime of the fluorophore to decay after adding a quencher, while IFE and SQE cannot [27]. As shown in Figure 7a, the fluorescence decay lifetimes of the MPA-InP/ZnS QDs without and with Cu2+ were 1.07 ns and 1.02 ns, respectively; these values were almost unchanged, indicating that FRET, PET, and dynamic quenching do not occur between MPA-InP/ZnS QDs and Cu2+. Moreover, IFE can be confirmed by UV-Vis absorption spectrum because IFE requires a certain degree of overlap between the excitation or emission band of the fluorophore and the absorption band of the UV-Vis spectrum of the quencher [28]. As shown in Figure 7b, the absorption band of Cu2+ in the range of 200 nm to 270 nm with a peak at 205 nm was observed, and the absorption band of Cu2+ overlaps with the excitation peak of the MPA-InP/ZnS QDs at 250 nm, indicating that the IFE may exist in the quenching mechanism. To further confirm the quenching mechanism, a typical Stern–Volmer diagram was constructed:
F 0 / F = 1 + K S V [ Q ] = 1 + K q τ 0 [ Q ]
where F0 is the fluorescence intensity of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs, F is the fluorescence intensity observed after adding Cu2+, KSV is the quenching Stern–Volmer constant, and [Q] is the concentration of the Cu2+, Kq is the dynamic quenching Stern–Volmer constant, and τ 0 is the lifetime of the InP/ZnS QDs. The static quenching can be judged by KSV in different temperatures. The value of KSV decreases with the increase of temperature in the SQE process [29]. Obviously, as shown in Figure 7c, with the increasing temperature from 20 °C to 40 °C, the slope of the curves that are KSV decreases, which confirms the existence of SQE. Moreover, the maximum Kq of collision quenching is 2 × 1010 L mol−1 s−1 [30]. In addition, the Kq of 20 °C, 30 °C, and 40 °C in this paper are 2.34 × 1015, 1.31 × 1015, and 1.21 × 1015, respectively, which are much larger. The results further confirm the existence of SQE.

3.4. Detection of Cu2+ in Real Samples

The applicability and accuracy of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs for the detection of Cu2+ in environmental water samples and drinking samples were investigated. As shown in Table 1, spiked detections were carried out in pure water of Watsons; the recovery was 93.64–120.91%, and the relative standard deviation (RSD) (n = 3) was below 1.02%. The results of the detection of Cu2+ in different water samples using our prepared MPA-InP/ZnS QDs probes and ICP-MS are listed in Table 2 and Figure S2. The results of the two methods demonstrate that the MPA-InP/ZnS QDs probes are highly accurate and have the ability to detect trace amounts of Cu2+ in real water samples.
The performance of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs probes was also compared with several previously reported studies on the detection of Cu2+ in water. As shown in Table 3 and Figure S3, the detection range of fluorescent probes for Cu2+ can reach hundreds of micromoles; however, the LOD is difficult to reach for the nanomolar level. As the comparison, the detection range of our probe is 0–1000 nM with the LOD of 0.22 nM, which exhibited superior sensing performance, especially in the detection of trace Cu2+. Our work shows promising prospects in the highly sensitive detection of trace Cu2+ in real water.

4. Conclusions

In summary, MPA-capped MPA-InP/ZnS QDs were synthesized by a solvothermal method; they exhibited bright yellow fluorescence and excellent monodispersity in aqueous solution. A highly sensitive and highly selective fluorescent probe for the detection of trace Cu2+ was developed using the synthesized MPA-InP/ZnS QDs. The fluorescence intensity of the MPA-InP/ZnS QDs can be quenched significantly in the presence of Cu2+ due to the SQE, which showed an excellent linear relationship with Cu2+ in the concentration range of 0–1000 nM, with a detection limit of 0.22 nM. Furthermore, the probe was applied to the detection of Cu2+ in environmental water and drink samples, indicating that MPA-InP/ZnS QDs could be used as a fluorescence probe in the application of highly sensitive and rapid detection of trace Cu2+ in real water.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods10112777/s1, Figure S1: The response curves of InP/ZnS QDs solutions with concentrations of 6 nM, 10 nM, 14 nM and 18 nM to different concentrations of Cu2+, Figure S2: The data comparison image of the detection results of the two methods, Figure S3: The results comparison image of this work and literature.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.X. and J.Z.; experimental design, Z.X.; data curation, Z.X.; formal analysis, Z.X.; investigation, Z.X.; methodology, Z.X. and J.Z.; writing—original draft, Z.X.; conceptualization, J.Z.; writing—review and editing, J.Z.; formal analysis, C.S.; supervision, C.S. and Y.W.; funding acquisition, X.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Research and Development Projects in Key Areas of Guangdong Province (grant number 2019B020225001) and Young Beijing Scholar.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Gaetke, L.; Chow, C.K. Copper toxicity, oxidative stress, and antioxidant nutrients. Toxicology 2003, 189, 147–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Luo, Y.; Zhang, L.; Liu, W.; Yu, Y.; Tian, Y. A Single Biosensor for Evaluating the Levels of Copper Ion and L-Cysteine in a Live Rat Brain with Alzheimer’s Disease. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 14053–14056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Georgopoulos, P.G.; Wang, S.W.; Georgopoulos, I.G.; Yonone-Lioy, M.J.; Lioy, P.J. Assessment of human exposure to copper: A case study using the NHEXAS database. J. Exp. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2006, 16, 397–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Kim, M.H.; Jang, H.H.; Yi, S.; Chang, S.; Han, M.S. Coumarin-derivative-based off-on catalytic chemodosimeter for Cu2+ ions. Chem. Commun. 2009, 32, 4838–4840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Al-Saydeh, S.A.; El-Naas, M.H.; Zaidi, S.J. Copper removal from industrial wastewater: A comprehensive review. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2017, 56, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Seidi, S.; Alavi, L. Novel and Rapid Deep Eutectic Solvent (DES) Homogeneous Liquid-Liquid Microextraction (HLLME) with Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (FAAS) Detection for the Determination of Copper in Vegetables. Anal. Lett. 2019, 52, 2092–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Smirnova, S.V.; Ilin, D.V.; Pletnev, I.V. Extraction and ICP-OES determination of heavy metals using tetrabutylammonium bromide aqueous biphasic system and oleophilic collector. Talanta 2021, 221, 121485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, W.; Evans, R.D.; Newman, K.; Toms, A. Automated separation and measurement of 226Ra and trace metals in freshwater, seawater and fracking water by online ion exchange chromatography coupled with ICP-MS. Microchem. J. 2021, 167, 106321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ghorbani, M.; Pedramrad, T.; Aghamohammadhasan, M.; Seyedin, O.; Akhlaghi, H.; Afshar Lahoori, N. Simultaneous clean-up and determination of Cu(II), Pb(II) and Cr(III) in real water and food samples using a magnetic dispersive solid phase microextraction and differential pulse voltammetry with a green and novel modified glassy carbon electrode. Microchem. J. 2019, 147, 545–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, Y.Z.; Xiao, N.; Cen, Y.Y.; Chen, J.R.; Liu, S.G.; Shi, Y.; Fan, Y.Z.; Li, N.B.; Luo, H.Q. Dual-emission ratiometric nanoprobe for visual detection of Cu(II) and intracellular fluorescence imaging. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. 2019, 223, 117300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Almeida, J.S.; Souza, O.C.C.O.; Teixeira, L.S.G. Determination of Pb, Cu and Fe in ethanol fuel samples by high-resolution continuum source electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry by exploring a combination of sequential and simultaneous strategies. Microchem. J. 2018, 137, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Arı, B.; Bakırdere, S. A primary reference method for the characterization of Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn in a candidate certified reference seawater material: TEA/Mg(OH)2 assisted ID3MS by triple quadrupole ICP-MS/MS. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1140, 178–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pizarro, J.; Flores, E.; Jimenez, V.; Maldonado, T.; Saitz, C.; Vega, A.; Godoy, F.; Segura, R. Synthesis and characterization of the first cyrhetrenyl-appended calix[4]arene macrocycle and its application as an electrochemical sensor for the determination of Cu(II) in bivalve mollusks using square wave anodic stripping voltammetry. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 281, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chakraborty, G.; Katiyar, V.; Pugazhenthi, G. Improvisation of polylactic acid (PLA)/exfoliated graphene (GR) nanocomposite for detection of metal ions (Cu2+). Compos. Sci. Technol. 2021, 213, 108877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gao, B.; Chen, D.; Gu, B.; Wang, T.; Wang, Z.; Xie, F.; Yang, Y.; Guo, Q.; Wang, G. Facile and highly effective synthesis of nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots as a fluorescent sensing probe for Cu2+ detection. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2020, 20, 538–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhao, L.; Li, H.; Xu, Y.; Liu, H.; Zhou, T.; Huang, N.; Li, Y.; Ding, L. Selective detection of copper ion in complex real samples based on nitrogen-doped carbon quantum dots. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. Res. 2018, 410, 4301–4309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sadeghi, S.; Davami, A. CdSe quantum dots capped with a deep eutectic solvent as a fluorescent probe for copper(II) determination in various drinks. Mikrochim. Acta 2020, 187, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ali, H.R.H.; Hassan, A.I.; Hassan, Y.F.; El-Wekil, M.M. Development of dual function polyamine-functionalized carbon dots derived from one step green synthesis for quantitation of Cu2+ and S2 ions in complicated matrices with high selectivity. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2020, 412, 1353–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zhang, S.; Li, J.; Zeng, M.; Xu, J.; Wang, X.; Hu, W. Polymer nanodots of graphitic carbon nitride as effective fluorescent probes for the detection of Fe3+ and Cu2+ ions. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 4157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xu, Y.; Fan, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Q.; Fu, H.; She, Y. A novel enhanced fluorescence method based on multifunctional carbon dots for specific detection of Hg2+ in complex samples. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. 2019, 220, 117109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Tessier, M.D.; Dupont, D.; De Nolf, K.; De Roo, J.; Hens, Z. Economic and Size-Tunable Synthesis of InP/ZnE (E = S, Se) Colloidal Quantum Dots. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 4893–4898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Leyden, E.; Farkas, J.; Gilbert, S.; Hutson, J.; Mosley, L.M. A simple and rapid ICP-MS/MS determination of sulfur isotope ratios (34S/32S) in complex natural waters: A new tool for tracing seawater intrusion in coastal systems. Talanta 2021, 235, 122708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jo, J.; Kim, M.; Han, C.; Jang, E.; Do, Y.R.; Yang, H. Effective surface passivation of multi-shelled InP quantum dots through a simple complexing with titanium species. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 428, 906–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Han, Z.; Nan, D.; Yang, H.; Sun, Q.; Pan, S.; Liu, H.; Hu, X. Carbon quantum dots based ratiometric fluorescence probe for sensitive and selective detection of Cu2+ and glutathione. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 298, 126842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lou, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhu, J. Metal ions optical sensing by semiconductor quantum dots. J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 2, 595–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, X.; Yang, T.; Wang, J.; Huang, C. CdTe Quantum Dots-Electrospun Nanofibers Assembly for Visual and Portable Detection of Cu2+. Chin. J. Anal. Chem. 2021, 49, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Meng, Y.; Jiao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Gao, Y.; Lu, W.; Liu, Y.; Shuang, S.; Dong, C. Multi-sensing function integrated nitrogen-doped fluorescent carbon dots as the platform toward multi-mode detection and bioimaging. Talanta 2020, 210, 120653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tang, X.; Yu, H.; Bui, B.; Wang, L.; Xing, C.; Wang, S.; Chen, M.; Hu, Z.; Chen, W. Nitrogen-doped fluorescence carbon dots as multi-mechanism detection for iodide and curcumin in biological and food samples. Bioact. Mater. 2021, 6, 1541–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gan, X.; Liu, S.; Liu, Z.; Hu, X. Determination of Tetracaine Hydrochloride by Fluorescence Quenching Method with Some Aromatic Amino Acids as Probes. J. Fluoresc. 2012, 22, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cui, M.; Song, G.; Wang, C.; Song, Q. Synthesis of cysteine-functionalized water-soluble luminescent copper nanoclusters and their application to the determination of chromium(VI). Mikrochim. Acta 2015, 182, 1371–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xie, Y.F.; Jiang, Y.J.; Zou, H.Y.; Wang, J.; Huang, C.Z. Discrimination of copper and silver ions based on the label-free quantum dots. Talanta 2020, 220, 121430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wu, W.; Min, S.; Tong, Q.; Wang, J.; Hu, J.; Dhamsaniya, A.; Shah, A.K.; Mehta, V.P.; Dong, B.; Song, B. Highly sensitive and selective “turn-off” fluorescent probes based on coumarin for detection of Cu2+. Colloids Interface Sci. Commun. 2021, 43, 100451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. TEM (a) and HRTEM images (b) of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs (inset: particle size distribution (i) and CCD image of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs (ii)). TEM: transmission electron microscopy, HRTEM: high resolution transmission electron microscope, MPA-InP/ZnS QDs: mercaptopropionic acid capped InP/ZnS quantum dots, CCD: charge couple device.
Figure 1. TEM (a) and HRTEM images (b) of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs (inset: particle size distribution (i) and CCD image of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs (ii)). TEM: transmission electron microscopy, HRTEM: high resolution transmission electron microscope, MPA-InP/ZnS QDs: mercaptopropionic acid capped InP/ZnS quantum dots, CCD: charge couple device.
Foods 10 02777 g001
Figure 2. FT-IR spectrum (a), XPS patterns (b), C1s XPS spectrum (c), and O1s XPS spectrum (d) of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs. XPS: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, C1s XPS: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of 1s orbital electron peak of carbon atom, O1s XPS: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of 1s orbital electron peak of oxygen atom, MPA-InP/ZnS QDs: mercaptopropionic acid capped InP/ZnS quantum dots.
Figure 2. FT-IR spectrum (a), XPS patterns (b), C1s XPS spectrum (c), and O1s XPS spectrum (d) of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs. XPS: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, C1s XPS: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of 1s orbital electron peak of carbon atom, O1s XPS: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of 1s orbital electron peak of oxygen atom, MPA-InP/ZnS QDs: mercaptopropionic acid capped InP/ZnS quantum dots.
Foods 10 02777 g002
Figure 3. The absorption spectrum, excitation, and emission spectroscopy (a). (insert: photos of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs solutions under sunlight (i) and UV light (365 nm)) (ii) Emission spectroscopy with different excitation of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs (b). MPA-InP/ZnS QDs: mercaptopropionic acid capped InP/ZnS quantum dots.
Figure 3. The absorption spectrum, excitation, and emission spectroscopy (a). (insert: photos of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs solutions under sunlight (i) and UV light (365 nm)) (ii) Emission spectroscopy with different excitation of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs (b). MPA-InP/ZnS QDs: mercaptopropionic acid capped InP/ZnS quantum dots.
Foods 10 02777 g003
Figure 4. The fluorescence intensity of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs without and with Cu2+ in different pH and the fluorescence-quenching rate of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs after adding Cu2+ (a), the fluorescence intensity of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs in different concentrations (b), and the changes of fluorescence intensity of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs with added copper over time (c). MPA-InP/ZnS QDs: mercaptopropionic acid capped InP/ZnS quantum dots.
Figure 4. The fluorescence intensity of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs without and with Cu2+ in different pH and the fluorescence-quenching rate of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs after adding Cu2+ (a), the fluorescence intensity of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs in different concentrations (b), and the changes of fluorescence intensity of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs with added copper over time (c). MPA-InP/ZnS QDs: mercaptopropionic acid capped InP/ZnS quantum dots.
Foods 10 02777 g004aFoods 10 02777 g004b
Figure 5. The fluorescence spectra of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs with different added concentrations of Cu2+ (0 nM, 3 nM, 5 nM, 10 nM, 15 nM, 20 nM, 30 nM, 50 nM, 100 nM, 150 nM, 200 nM, 250 nM, 300 nM, 400 nM, 600 nM, and 1000 nM) (a), (insert: photos of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs solutions with different concentrations of Cu2+ under 365 nm UV light) and the relationship between the F0/F and the concentrations of Cu2+ (b), (insert: the relationship between the F0/F and low concentrations of Cu2+ (0–50 nM)). MPA-InP/ZnS QDs: mercaptopropionic acid capped InP/ZnS quantum dots.
Figure 5. The fluorescence spectra of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs with different added concentrations of Cu2+ (0 nM, 3 nM, 5 nM, 10 nM, 15 nM, 20 nM, 30 nM, 50 nM, 100 nM, 150 nM, 200 nM, 250 nM, 300 nM, 400 nM, 600 nM, and 1000 nM) (a), (insert: photos of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs solutions with different concentrations of Cu2+ under 365 nm UV light) and the relationship between the F0/F and the concentrations of Cu2+ (b), (insert: the relationship between the F0/F and low concentrations of Cu2+ (0–50 nM)). MPA-InP/ZnS QDs: mercaptopropionic acid capped InP/ZnS quantum dots.
Foods 10 02777 g005
Figure 6. The stability (a) and the selectivity (b) of the fluorescent probe.
Figure 6. The stability (a) and the selectivity (b) of the fluorescent probe.
Foods 10 02777 g006
Figure 7. The fluorescence lifetime decay curves of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs without and with Cu2+ (a); the absorption spectrum of Cu2+, excitation, and emission spectra of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs (b); the calibration curves between F0/F and the concentrations of Cu2+ under different temperature (20 °C, 30 °C, and 40 °C) (c). MPA-InP/ZnS QDs: mercaptopropionic acid capped InP/ZnS quantum dots.
Figure 7. The fluorescence lifetime decay curves of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs without and with Cu2+ (a); the absorption spectrum of Cu2+, excitation, and emission spectra of MPA-InP/ZnS QDs (b); the calibration curves between F0/F and the concentrations of Cu2+ under different temperature (20 °C, 30 °C, and 40 °C) (c). MPA-InP/ZnS QDs: mercaptopropionic acid capped InP/ZnS quantum dots.
Foods 10 02777 g007
Table 1. Determination results of copper ions (Cu2+) in pure water of Watsons samples (n = 3).
Table 1. Determination results of copper ions (Cu2+) in pure water of Watsons samples (n = 3).
Spiked/nMFound/nMRecovery (%)RSD (%)
5.004.9799.330.58
10.0012.09120.910.54
20.0018.7393.641.02
Table 2. Detection of Cu2+ using this method and ICP-MS (n = 3).
Table 2. Detection of Cu2+ using this method and ICP-MS (n = 3).
SamplesThis MethodICP-MS
Found/nMRSD (%)Found/nMRSD (%)
Sample 15.165.245.310.54
Sample 24.292.423.751.04
Sample 314.031.9612.500.67
Sample 47.971.096.560.47
Sample 513.591.7914.690.64
Sample 64.685.663.381.23
Sample 75.077.253.690.78
Sample 83.812.963.750.97
Sample 917.474.4715.091.06
Sample 1031.065.1333.130.54
Table 3. Comparison of the performance of fluorescent MPA-InP/ZnS QDs probes for the detection of Cu2+.
Table 3. Comparison of the performance of fluorescent MPA-InP/ZnS QDs probes for the detection of Cu2+.
MaterialsPrincipleDetection RangeLODReaction TimeApplicationsRef.
Mercaptoacetic acid-CdTe QDsDynamic quenching40–600 nM35.0 nM5 minUrine[31]
Polyamine@C-dotsStatic quenching effect0.07–60 μM0.02 μM15 minConduit water, tap water, and mineral water[18]
CoumarinStatic quenching effect0–50 μM0.27 μM10 minTap water[32]
CdTe QDs-polyethyleneimine/
polyvinyl alcohol electrospun
Dynamic quenching0.08–800 μM11.1 nM50 minLake water[26]
Deep eutectic solvent-CdSe QDsAggregation-induced emission10–600 nM5.3 nM1 minTap water, mineral water, pineapple fruit juice, milk, and cola[17]
MPA-InP/ZnS QDsStatic quenching effect0–1000 nM0.22 nM12 minRiver water, tap water, purified water, mineral water, drinking water, and beveragesThis work
MPA-InP/ZnS QDs: mercaptopropionic acid capped InP/ZnS quantum dots.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Shi, C.; Yang, X. A Highly Sensitive and Selective Fluorescent Probe Using MPA-InP/ZnS QDs for Detection of Trace Amounts of Cu2+ in Water. Foods 2021, 10, 2777. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112777

AMA Style

Xu Z, Wang Y, Zhang J, Shi C, Yang X. A Highly Sensitive and Selective Fluorescent Probe Using MPA-InP/ZnS QDs for Detection of Trace Amounts of Cu2+ in Water. Foods. 2021; 10(11):2777. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112777

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Zeyu, Yizhong Wang, Jiaran Zhang, Ce Shi, and Xinting Yang. 2021. "A Highly Sensitive and Selective Fluorescent Probe Using MPA-InP/ZnS QDs for Detection of Trace Amounts of Cu2+ in Water" Foods 10, no. 11: 2777. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112777

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop