Product Design to Enhance Consumer Liking of Cull Ewe Meat
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Phase 1: Problem Definition
2.1.1. Consumer Needs
2.1.2. Producer Needs
2.1.3. Foodservice Needs
2.1.4. User Need Statements and Goals
2.2. Phase 2: Dish Ideation and Prototype Development
2.2.1. Ideation
2.2.2. Prototype Development
2.3. Phase 3: Perceptual Mapping (Foodservice)
2.3.1. Panels
2.3.2. Discussion Guide
2.3.3. Facilitation
2.3.4. Perceptual Mapping Exercise
2.4. Phase 4: Sensory Evaluation (Consumers)
2.4.1. Stimuli
2.4.2. Consumer Panel
2.4.3. Survey Format
2.4.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Problem Definition
3.2. Perceptual Mapping
3.2.1. Insights from Perceptual Mapping
3.2.2. Insights from the WAI Chef and Butcher Attending the Sessions
3.3. Consumer Evaluation
4. Discussion
4.1. Problem Definition
4.2. Perceptual Mapping
4.3. Consumer Evaluation
4.4. Future Work
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Cut | Dish/Concept | Review Result |
---|---|---|
Forequarter | Meatballs in Moroccan spiced tomato sauce and sweet potato crust | Not included to control size of stimulus set |
Kofta | Included without specifying source cut | |
(Family of 4) Tagine | Not included to control size of stimulus set | |
(Family of 4) Lasagne | Not included to control size of stimulus set | |
Irish stew | Included | |
(Family of 4) Mutton pasties | Not included to control size of stimulus set | |
(Family of 4) Mutton and potato curry | Included | |
Braise | Included as Mutton shoulder braise | |
Stew | Not included to control size of stimulus set | |
($100) Butterflied neck fillets marinated with thyme and garlic, chargrilled finished with fresh shaved truffle and soft polenta | Included | |
($100) Mutton 3 ways: cooked shoulder on bone; carpaccio; boudin | Included | |
(Indigenous) Wattle seed encrusted rack of mutton | Included | |
($100) Pink seared loin with slow-cooked shoulder with mutton bacon garnish | Not included to control size of stimulus set | |
Cutlets | Included | |
Backstrap portions/medallion | Included as Backstrap with roast pumpkin and anchovy | |
(Indigenous) Wrapped in paperbark, lemon myrtle, pepperberry | Included | |
Lamb/mutton bacon | Not included as requires too much processing | |
Leg | Whole roast leg | Included |
Topside—ham | Not included as requires too much processing | |
Topside—bresaola | Not included as requires too much processing | |
Topside—sausages | Not included to control size of stimulus set | |
Topside sous vide | Included | |
Round—meat pie (Family of 4) | Not included to control size of stimulus set | |
Round—meatloaf | Not included to control size of stimulus set | |
Round—burger | Included | |
Round—shami kebabs | Included | |
Round—shepherd’s pie | Not included to control size of stimulus set | |
Round—meatloaf (family of 4) | Not included to control size of stimulus set | |
Round—schnitzel | Included | |
Round—cured and smoked | Not included as few foodservice outlets could offer this option | |
Round—sous vide | Included | |
Silverside—pastrami | Not included as few foodservice outlets could offer this option | |
Silverside—brined | Not included as few foodservice outlets could offer this option | |
Rump—shish kebab | Not included to control size of stimulus set | |
Rump—steaks | Not included to control size of stimulus set | |
Rump—whole roast | Not included to control size of stimulus set | |
Rump—sous vide and roasted with lemon myrtle and warrigal greens | Included only as sous vide product no indigenous accompaniments | |
Rump—fennel seed encrusted and dried as a small good | Not included as few foodservice outlets could offer this option | |
Whole sheep | Change the name from mutton to Jumbuck (or similar) | Included |
(Indigenous) Mutton hangi | Not included as few foodservice outlets could offer this option |
Appendix B
Stage | Description | Objective | Key Questions |
---|---|---|---|
Welcome and Introduction (10 min) | Housekeeping -Introduce participants -Introduce researchers -Confidentiality -Honesty—no right or wrong answers -Collection of consent forms | Meeting the respondent and setting the scene | NA |
Why dry age mutton? (10 min) | Interactive session with PowerPoint presentation on project background | Meeting the respondent and setting the scene | NA |
Establish baseline (15 min) | Sheepmeat usage Dry aged sheepmeat/mutton perspectives | Understand where they currently sit in this space, history of usage | Is sheepmeat everyday (common) or premium? What is your favorite sheepmeat dish for the restaurant? What is your favorite sheepmeat cut? What is the most expensive sheepmeat product?
How familiar are you with dry aged sheepmeat products? Do you see dry aged sheepmeat as a premium product vs. spring lamb? Do you see dry aged mutton as a premium product? Typically, sheepmeat is one item on a menu. How can it be more than one option? Is there a better descriptor than mutton? Jumbuck? Who is the customer for sheepmeat dishes? Who do you think would be the customer for dry aged mutton? |
Perceptual mapping exercise (90 min) | We will present you a set of meal concepts for dry aged sheepmeat and ask you to map them. Some will be images, and some will be dishes you can taste. Map set of concepts against price $10–$100 (x axis) and menu type classic to foodie (y axis) | To identify concept attributes that are driving the mapping and understand the participant reactions to those attributes | What makes a concept classic? Can classic be premium? What makes a concept premium—cuts? Is it more than just the dry aged description? Can lower cost cuts go into a premium dish? Why is a recipe lower cost? For premium, does it need to have more provenance elements? What provenance variables matter? Indigenous elements, sustainability, limited availability, craftsmanship/artisan, the producer story, health benefits. How can the concepts be made more ideal? Premium? Fat content? Color? Bone in bone out? Processing (frenched?) Sensory journey? Dry ageing, what impact does this have? Tenderness, juiciness, flavor, odor? Looking at the map what works, what does not work? If you could get hold of dry aged mutton easily, what cuts are you most likely to buy? Least? Why? How long would this take to prepare? How long would this take to cook? What is the impact on operating costs? What do you think you can charge for a dry aged mutton meal? What other concepts would you like to try? How do we get dry aged mutton onto chefs’ radar? |
Wrap up | Review of carcass cut map | To understand opportunity for the whole carcass and where do we have gaps in current usage practice | Anything else we should be thinking at? |
Appendix C
Melbourne Session | Perth Session |
---|---|
Cut and cooking method preferences It was apparent that most participants were inexperienced with using mutton products in the kitchen, and that they were extrapolating their experiences and preferences for lamb cuts when mapping image stimuli of mutton cuts (Figure A1). This was particularly evident during the mapping of the cutlet image stimuli (cutlet is a popular premium lamb cut in Australia [60,61]; the image was mapped at the classic end of the classic to foodie axis, and at the center of the economy to premium axis initially. However, after tasting the mutton cutlet, the participants re-mapped it closer to the economy end of the x axis (Figure A1). This was due to poor eating quality (toughness) attributed to the presence of higher amounts of connective tissue in older animals [14]. Conversely, upon tasting slow-roasted mutton leg, they re-mapped it closer to the premium end of the x-scale as opposed to the original image stimuli of slow-cooked Jumbuck leg which was located at the center of the map. | In general, the Perth participants were more experienced in the use of dry aged mutton products. Several already had popular menu options of slow-cooked dry aged mutton bone-in cuts such as brined whole leg or forequarter that were served as shared dishes or as individual plates. Whilst the image stimuli based on cutlets and racks were still rated as premium by this group (Appendix C, Figure A2), unlike the Melbourne group they were considered classic menu items; upon tasting the mutton cutlets, they re-mapped them as foodie. Several participants revealed they would not cook mutton cutlets in their own restaurants as it was far too easy to overcook, and its preparation was too time consuming (as all silverskin needs to be removed before cooking). Sous vide rump and backstrap dishes were well received by this group; they particularly liked how tender the cuts were and that many consistently sized portions could be prepared ahead of service. The slider was also well received by this group, and they were enthusiastic about the flavor and texture of the dry aged mince. It was proposed dry aged mince was a far more attractive product than loin due to its convenience and versatility, especially since many restaurants do not have facilities to handle or store large primal cuts of meat, or to prepare their own mince. For this group, product preference was driven by eating quality, followed closely by convenience and versatility. |
Menu fit Overall, the stimuli were mapped across the whole range of the classic to foodie axis (Figure A1), suggesting dry aged mutton was a versatile ingredient that could be used in a wide range of menus. Interestingly, several image stimuli were mapped as both classic and foodie by the group, i.e., Irish stew, shami kebab, and mutton and potato curry; upon inquiring into the root cause for this, it was revealed classic dishes such as Irish stew and mutton and potato curry were associated with a “retro” trend popular in Melbourne “foodie” outlets, while shami kebab lends itself to an eclectic menu also popular in Melbourne foodie establishments. From a menu planning perspective, almost all participants in both focus groups thought that the inclusion of more than one mutton dish on the menu would negatively affect its balance. They generally strove to offer one each of beef, chicken/duck and mutton/lamb. A justification for this spread was the variety it offered to customers; another was that duplication of the meats on one menu could lead to confusion for new staff. | As with the Melbourne group, stimuli were mapped across the range of the classic to foodie axis and several dishes were mapped in more than once (Appendix C, Figure A2); for example, mutton shoulder braise was both a Classic premium dish and a foodie economy dish, and while sous vide backstrap was premium it was considered both classic and foodie. Also, as discussed with the Melbourne group, more than one sheepmeat option on the menu was not attractive. |
Premiumness Premiumness of a dish was influenced by eating quality but also by presentation; more complex dishes tended to be rated as more premium, e.g., mutton 3 ways (Figure A1). Dishes that used mince, i.e., kofta, slider, shami kebab were mapped as economy dishes, as were the dishes using diced unidentified cuts such as the mutton and potato curry and Irish stew. Upon inquiring about the drivers of premiumness, participants explained that the extent to which dry aged mutton could be branded as a premium product was dependent on the presentation and accompaniments of a dish as opposed to the appeal of the meat’s eating quality alone. | Similar to the Melbourne group, eating quality and dish complexity drove premiumness for this group, while dishes using unidentified meat such as mince or dice were considered economy. For this group, the perceived premiumness of a dish did not necessarily equate to a desire to have the dish or product in their menus. |
The use of the term Jumbuck While some participants had heard the term used in relation to mutton before, they were in the minority. The opinions towards referring to the product as Jumbuck were mixed, but generally pointed towards a preference for more premium names such as “Dry aged Merino” or “Vintage” to convey the value of the product, thereby extending the possibilities of its use in higher-end establishments. Comparisons were made to parallel the premium sentiment conveyed by “dry aged wagyu beef” in relation to just “dry aged beef” with using “dry aged merino” in relation to just “dry aged mutton”. While there were positive sentiments towards the name, at least one participant pointed out that whilst the term could be used in line with individual brands for their branding purposes, they preferred to keep mutton as the generic name. It was also proposed by the participants that younger foodies might be a potential target market for premium dry aged mutton dishes, as they are unfamiliar with the negative connotations associated with mutton (as an older and cheaper form of sheepmeat). | The Perth group was more compelled than the Melbourne group by the term Jumbuck, but they were far more interested in the local Noongar (South west; Western Australian indigenous language group) name for sheep “Kookendjeri” which was proposed by one of the observers [62]. Upon discussing the term mutton, they suggested this name would appeal to both older and younger consumers, older consumers remembering mutton with nostalgia and younger consumers keen to try out something “new”. |
The use of indigenous ingredients The inclusion of native ingredients such as paperbark, lemon myrtle, and wattle seed were associated with a foodie menu. It was interesting to include native ingredients but not necessarily compelling for the Melbourne group. | The use of indigenous ingredients was compelling for this group; in fact, one attendee bought dried saltbush with them so the group could try it with the dishes. Interestingly, this group also mapped the wattle seed encrusted rack as classic rather than foodie. These differences in appreciation of indigenous ingredients and terms were ascribed to food culture differences in Western Australia and Melbourne. |
Future opportunities Participants suggested enhancing dry aged sheepmeat’s premium status through provenance stories, i.e., the story of where the meat was sourced—geographic region, grass/grain fed, breed, producer and dry ageing process. | This group was enthusiastic about adopting more convenient formats in their restaurants such as the mince and sous vide and suggested these may be good formats to commercialize with other foodservice outlets such as quick service restaurants, catering, airlines, etc. Both the slider and schnitzel concepts were considered innovative options that they would like to try. |
The importance of supply and storage Participants were apprehensive about the storage and shelf life of whole carcasses or primal cuts due to the short shelf life of dry aged products. The Melbourne focus group added that regulatory guidelines from Prime Safe (the food safety regulatory body for the state of Victoria, Australia) exacerbated this issue, with stringent guidelines around the process of dry ageing and the storage of dry aged product that limited the usability of product [63]. One of the participants saw this as prohibitively difficult, rendering dry aged sheepmeat an unviable product for their restaurant. | The concerns of the Melbourne group regarding supply and storage of dry aged mutton product were shared with the Perth group. The Perth participants were in most part already arranging supply directly with producers and were also not subject to the same regulatory constraints as the Melbourne restaurateurs. Some of the Perth group use vacuum packaging in cryovac® bags for storage of dry aged product. While this was acknowledged to help alleviate some worries, the process of vacuum packing was at odds with the preference for bone-in cuts and their subsequent sharp edges. An alternative suggestion was that of tin foil wrapping which protected the dry aged meat but still allowed it to “breathe”. One participant had tried to use the dry aged bag technology (UMAi Dry®) but found cryovac was better for storage of product that had finished ageing. |
References
- Hatcher, S.; Dominik, S.; Richards, J.S.; Young, J.; Smith, J.; Tearle, R.; Brien, F.D.; Hermann, N. Ewe culling and retention strategies to increase reproductive rates in merino sheep. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2018, 58, 1545–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mounter, S.; Zhang, Y.; Griffith, G. Calibrating and validating an equilibrium displacement model of the Australian sheep meat industry. Australas. Agribus. Rev. 2019, 27, 107–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MLA. Industry Projections 2019; Australian Sheep. Available online: https://www.mla.com.au/globalassets/mla-corporate/prices--markets/documents/trends--analysis/sheep-projections/mla_australian-sheep-industry-projections-2019.pdf (accessed on 11 November 2020).
- MLA. Sheep Age/Dentition. Available online: https://solutionstofeedback.mla.com.au/Sheep/AgeDentition (accessed on 22 October 2020).
- Ausmeat. Sheepmeat Language. Available online: https://www.ausmeat.com.au/WebDocuments/SheepMeat_Language.pdf (accessed on 16 October 2020).
- East, I.J.; Foreman, I. The structure, dynamics and movement patterns of the Australian sheep industry. Aust. Vet. J. 2011, 89, 477–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- MLA. MLA and AWI Wool and Sheepmeat Survey Report-Sheepmeat. 2018. Available online: https://www.mla.com.au/globalassets/mla-corporate/prices--markets/documents/trends--analysis/sheepmeat-survey/mla-and-awi-wool-and-sheepmeat-survey-june-2018-report-mla-3-8-18-final.pdf (accessed on 8 November 2020).
- Rees, C.; Mullumby, J. Trends in Australian meat consumption. Agric. Commod. 2017, 7, 82–85. Available online: http://www.agriculture.gov.au/abares/publications (accessed on 21 October 2020).
- MLA. Fast Facts 2019 Australia’s Sheep Industry. Available online: https://www.mla.com.au/globalassets/mla-corporate/prices--markets/documents/trends--analysis/fast-facts--maps/mla-sheep-fast-facts-2019-1.pdf (accessed on 11 November 2020).
- Young, O.; Pethick, D.; Ross, I.; Meat and Livestock Australia. Improving Lamb and Sheepmeat Eating Quality: A Technical Guide for the Australian Sheepmeat Supply Chain; Meat and Livestock Australia: North Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Watkins, P.J.; Kearney, G.; Rose, G.; Allen, D.; Ball, A.J.; Pethick, D.W.; Warner, R.D. Effect of branched-chain fatty acids, 3-methylindole and 4-methylphenol on consumer sensory scores of grilled lamb meat. Meat Sci. 2014, 96, 1088–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prescott, J.; Young, O.; O’Neill, L. The impact of variations in flavour compounds on meat acceptability: A comparison of Japanese and New Zealand consumers. Food Qual. Prefer. 2001, 12, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hopkins, D.L.; Allingham, P.G.; Colgrave, M.; van de Ven, R.J. Interrelationship between measures of collagen, compression, shear force and tenderness. Meat Sci. 2013, 95, 219–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pethick, D.W.; Hopkins, D.L.; D’Souza, D.N.; Thompson, J.M.; Walker, P.J. Effects of animal age on the eating quality of sheep meat. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2005, 45, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hopkins, D.L.; Hegarty, R.S.; Walker, P.J.; Pethick, D.W. Relationship between animal age, intramuscular fat, cooking loss, ph, shear force and eating quality of aged meat from sheep. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2006, 46, 879–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Young, O.A.; Braggins, T.J. Tenderness of ovine semimembranosus: Is collagen concentration or solubility the critical factor? Meat Sci. 1993, 35, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thompson, J.M.; Hopkins, D.L.; D’Souza, D.N.; Walker, P.J.; Baud, S.R.; Pethick, D.W. The impact of processing on sensory and objective measurements of sheep meat eating quality. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2005, 45, 561–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MLA. Meat Standards Australia; Sheepmeat. Available online: https://www.mla.com.au/globalassets/mla-corporate/marketing-beef-and-lamb/documents/meat-standards-australia/msa-sheep-brochure_web.pdf (accessed on 11 November 2020).
- Hastie, M.; Ashman, H.; Torrico, D.D.; Ha, M.; Warner, R.D. A mixed method approach for the investigation of consumer responses to sheepmeat and beef. Foods 2020, 9, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Burvill, T. Project Code v.rmh.0038; Final Report. Dry Aged Lamb Proof of Concept Development. Published by Meat and Livestock Australia Limited, Locked Bag 1961, North Sydney NSW 2016. Available online: https://www.mla.com.au/contentassets/f1f3ed3ca0d84d828fbd3d390d2ec1db/v.rmh.0038_final_report.pdf (accessed on 16 June 2020).
- Burvill, T. Project Code: V.mh.0045; Final Report. Dry Aged Lamb Proof of Concept Stage 2. Published by Meat and Livestock Australia Limited, Locked Bag 1961, North Sydney NSW 2016. Available online: http://www.mla.com.au/download/finalreports?itemId=3252 (accessed on 16 June 2020).
- Dashdorj, D.; Tripathi, V.K.; Cho, S.; Kim, Y.; Hwang, I. Dry aging of beef; review. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2016, 58, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Galletly, J. Dry Aged Beef—Design and Good Manufacturing Practices Review. Published by Meat and Livestock Australia Limited, Locked Bag 1961, North Sydney NSW. 2016. Available online: https://www.mla.com.au/download/finalreports?itemId=3148 (accessed on 18 November 2020).
- Smith, A.M.; Harris, K.B.; Griffin, D.B.; Miller, R.K.; Kerth, C.R.; Savell, J.W. Retail yields and palatability evaluations of individual muscles from wet-aged and dry-aged beef ribeyes and top sirloin butts that were merchandised innovatively. Meat Sci. 2014, 97, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Starling, S. Dry Ageing Expands Sheepmeats Place on the Menu. Available online: https://www.mla.com.au/news-and-events/industry-news/dry-ageing-expands-sheepmeats-place-on-the-menu/2016 (accessed on 11 November 2020).
- Thompson, J.M.; Gee, A.; Hopkins, D.L.; Pethick, D.W.; Baud, S.R.; O’Halloran, W.J. Development of a sensory protocol for testing palatability of sheep meats. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2005, 45, 469–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angel-Rendon, S.V.; Filomena-Ambrosio, A.; Hernandez-Carrion, M.; Llorca, E.; Hernando, I.; Quiles, A.; Sotelo-Diaz, I. Pork meat prepared by different cooking methods. A microstructural, sensorial and physicochemical approach. Meat Sci. 2020, 163, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Font-I-Furnols, M.; Guerrero, L. Consumer preference, behavior and perception about meat and meat products: An overview. Meat Sci. 2014, 98, 361–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoppert, K.; Mai, R.; Zahn, S.; Hoffmann, S.; Rohm, H. Integrating sensory evaluation in adaptive conjoint analysis to elaborate the conflicting influence of intrinsic and extrinsic attributes on food choice. Appetite 2012, 59, 949–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Grunert, K.G. The common ground between sensory and consumer science. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2015, 3, 19–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olsen, N.V. Viewpoint: Design thinking and food innovation. Trends Food Sci. Technol 2015, 41, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Costa, A.I.A.; Jongen, W.M.F. New insights into consumer-led food product development. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2006, 17, 457–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grunert, K.G. Food quality and safety: Consumer perception and demand. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2005, 32, 369–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moskowitz, H.R. Product Testing and Sensory Evaluation of Foods: Marketing and R&D Approaches; Food & Nutrition Press: Westport, CT, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
- Moskowitz, H.R.; Trumbull, C.T. Food Concepts and Products: Just in Time Development; Moskowitz Jacobs Inc.: White Plains, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Schifferstein, H.N. Employing consumer research for creating new and engaging food experiences in a changing world. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2015, 3, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costa, A.I.A.; Dekker, M.; Jongen, W.M.F. An overview of means-end theory: Potential application in consumer-oriented food product design. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2004, 15, 403–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, T. Design thinking. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2008, 86, 84–92. Available online: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=Brown%2C+T.+2008.+%22Design+Thinking%2C%22+Harvard+Business+Review%2C+June%2C+pp.+84-92 (accessed on 18 August 2020). [PubMed]
- Buhl, A.; Schmidt-Keilich, M.; Muster, V.; Blazejewski, S.; Schrader, U.; Harrach, C.; Schäfer, M.; Süßbauer, E. Design thinking for sustainability: Why and how design thinking can foster sustainability-oriented innovation development. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 231, 1248–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mickahail, B. Corporate implementation of design thinking for innovation and economic growth. J. Strateg. Innov. Sustain. 2015, 10, 67–79. Available online: http://www.nabuspress.com/JSIS/MickahailB_Web10_2_.pdf (accessed on 20 November 2020).
- Cross, N. Design Thinking: UNDERSTANDING How Designers Think and Work; English ed.; Berg Publishers: Oxford, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Harrington, R.J.; Ottenbacher, M.C. Managing the culinary innovation process: The case of new product development. J. Culin. Sci. Technol. 2013, 11, 4–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ottenbacher, M.; Harrington, R.J. The culinary innovation process: A study of michelin-starred chefs. J. Culin. Sci. Technol. 2006, 5, 9–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Australian National University, School of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, Meanings and Origins of Australian Words and Idioms. Available online: https://slll.cass.anu.edu.au/centres/andc/meanings-origins/j (accessed on 12 November 2020).
- Ausmeat. Handbook of Australian Meat, 7th ed.; Ausmeat: South Brisbane, Australia, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Miller, M.F.; Hoover, L.C.; Cook, K.D.; Guerra, A.L.; Huffman, K.L.; Tinney, K.S.; Ramsey, C.B.; Brittin, H.C.; Huffman, L.M. Consumer acceptability of beef steak tenderness in the home and restaurant. J. Food Sci. 1995, 963–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AMSA. Research Guidelines for Cookery, Sensory Evaluation, and Instrumental Tenderness Measurements of Meat, 2nd ed. 2015. Available online: https://meatscience.org/docs/default-source/publications-resources/amsa-sensory-and-tenderness-evaluation-guidelines/research-guide/2015-amsa-sensory-guidelines-1-0.pdf?sfvrsn=6 (accessed on 10 December 2020).
- Torrico, D.D.; Han, Y.; Sharma, C.; Fuentes, S.; Gonzalez Viejo, C.; Dunshea, F.R. Effects of Context and Virtual Reality Environments on the Wine Tasting Experience, Acceptability, and Emotional Responses of Consumers. Foods 2020, 9, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Google Map Images of the Angliss Bistro. Available online: https://www.google.com/maps/uv?pb=!1s0x6ad65d9e68b8ec63%3A0x51cd404724d3df77!3m1!7e115!4shttps%3A%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2Fp%2FAF1QipOb-gjgqxKqsPS1ZaVlYrFxaLtBl2xyUtXDd3_t%3Dw264-h264-k-no!5swilliam%20angliss%20bistro%20-%20Google%20Search!15sCgIgAQ&imagekey=!1e10!2sAF1QipPxQrF6CAPLxNsb2vyf68PcjUKEuHeQG481GZwf&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjwsIHz7uLtAhX34zgGHSVxAqUQoiowCnoECBgQAw&cshid=1608684155840171 (accessed on 23 December 2020).
- Sheridan, M. Time well spent: Slow cooking underutilized cuts of meat delivers value and richness. (food). Restaur. Inst. 2002, 12, 29–30. Available online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A82804134/AONE?u=unimelb&sid=AONE&xid=ef89a6a3 (accessed on 23 December 2020).
- Prentice, D. At Home with Sous Vide; The Slattery Media Group: Richmond, VIC, Australia, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Font i Furnols, M.; Realini, C.; Montossi, F.; Sanudo, C.; Campo, M.M.; Oliver, M.A.; Nute, G.R.; Guerrero, L. Consumer’s purchasing intention for lamb meat affected by country of origin, feeding system and meat price: A conjoint study in Spain, France and United Kingdom. Food Qual. Prefer. 2011, 22, 443–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dransfield, E.; Ngapo, T.M.; Nielsen, N.A.; Bredahl, L.; Sjoden, P.O.; Magnusson, M.; Campo, M.M.; Nute, G.R. Consumer choice and suggested price for pork as influenced by its appearance, taste and information concerning country of origin and organic pig production. Meat Sci. 2005, 69, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lawless, H.T.; Heymann, H. Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Hastie, M.; Jacob, R.; Bonney, S.; Huynh, L.; Polkinghorne, R.; Ha, M.; Torrico, D.; Ashman, H.; Warner, R. Influence of dry versus wet ageing of sheepmeat on eating quality. In Proceedings of the 65th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, Potsdam/Berlin, Germany, 4–9 August 2019; Available online: https://digicomst.ie/2019_08_26/ (accessed on 10 December 2020).
- Watson, R.; Gee, A.; Polkinghorne, R.; Porter, M. Consumer assessment of eating quality-development of protocols for Meat Standards Australia (MSA) testing. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2008, 48, 1360–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hwang, I.H.; Polkinghorne, R.; Lee, J.M.; Thompson, J.M. Demographic and design effects on beef sensory scores given by Korean and Australian consumers. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2008, 48, 1387–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- MLA. Guidelines for the Safe Production of Dry Aged Meat. Published by Meat and Livestock Australia Limited, Locked Bag 1961, North Sydney NSW. 2019. Available online: https://www.mla.com.au/globalassets/mla-corporate/research-and-development/program-areas/food-safety/pdfs/guidelines-for-the-safe-production-of-dry-aged-meat.pdf (accessed on 14 November 2020).
- Hastie, M.; Jacob, R.; Ha, M.; Hepworth, G.; Torrico, D.; Ashman, H.; Warner, R. Effect of carcase characteristics and sheep breeding values on the yield of dry- and wet-aged multipurpose merino cull ewe meat. Livest. Sci. 2021, 243, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MLA. Australian Retail and Foodservice during Covid-19. Available online: https://www.mla.com.au/news-and-events/industry-news/australian-retail-and-foodservice-during-covid-19/ (accessed on 28 September 2020).
- MLA. Meet the Butchers. Available online: https://www.mla.com.au/marketing-beef-and-lamb/promoting-the-industry/meet-the-butchers/ (accessed on 28 September 2020).
- Noongar Dictionary; Noongar to English and English to Noongar. Available online: https://bcsyear5.weebly.com/uploads/9/9/2/0/99206600/noongar-dictionary.pdf (accessed on 12 November 2020).
- PrimeSafe. Standards and Guidelines; Ageing of Beef. Available online: https://www.primesafe.vic.gov.au/standards-and-guidelines/primenotes/ageing-of-beef/#AcceptedMeasures (accessed on 12 November 2020).
Phase | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Problem Definition | 2. Dish Ideation and Prototype Development | 3. Test via Perceptual Mapping with Chefs | 4. Prototype and Test via Consumer Evaluation of Dishes | |
Number of participants | 94 | 7 | 12 (2 × 6) | 26 |
Method | Empathize Stakeholder consultation | Ideation Facilitated group session, produced 39 concept dishes | Test Facilitated group sessions to map image stimuli and prototype dishes | Prototype Develop 8 dishes Test Consumer sensory evaluation |
Output | Problem definition User needs and goals | Prototype 17 dishes (image stimuli and prototypes) for perceptual mapping | Perceptual map of 17 dishes: insights into the drivers of premiumness and foodservice menu suitability | 8 dishes validated for: liking, premiumness, frequency of consumption, foodservice outlet suitability |
Session | Descriptor | Preparation |
---|---|---|
Melbourne | Leg slow roasted | Slow roasted for 4–5 h at 120 °C to an internal temperature of 63 °C |
Slider | Mince with salt and pepper (10% rice flour by weight); 2/3 forequarter, the rest made up of trimming from loins, a bit of shank (quite dry) and neck chargrilled | |
Cutlets | Cutlets (rack), roasted on 160 °C, rested 60 °C to 65 °C | |
Braised shoulder | Braised shoulder, pressure cooked for 40 min | |
Sous vide rump | Rump, 58 °C sous vide for 10 h seared and rested | |
Sous vide round/backstrap | Round/backstrap, 58 °C sous vide for 2.5 h, seared and rested | |
Perth | Sliders | Same mince format as Melbourne session, chargrilled |
Cutlets | Cutlets, roasted on 110 °C, rested 58 °C to 60 °C | |
Braised shoulder | Braised shoulder, pressure cooked for 60 min | |
Sous vide rump | Rump, 58 °C sous vide for 10 h, seared and rested | |
Sous vide round/backstrap | Round/backstrap, 58 °C sous vide for 2.5 h, seared and rested |
Order | Menu Description | Cut HAM * | Cooking Technique |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Xinjiang-style skewers | Shoulder 4972 | Lean and fat pieces, threaded onto bamboo skewers, marinated then cooked over coals |
2 | Greek-style wood fired pitas | Silverside 5071 | Marinated for 30 min, basted and roasted at 160 °C to an internal temperature of 65 °C |
3 | Sliders, beetroot relish, rocket, mint yoghurt | Offcuts | Minced with 20% fat + 10% rice flour + 1% salt, grilled |
4 | Vietnamese-style Pho | Backstrap 5109 | Back strap and bones: aromatic mutton bone broth with sliced sous vide backstrap |
5 | Piccata with textures of corn; | Topside 5073 | sliced to 3 mm thick, crumbed, shallow fried |
6 | Smoked, with purple salad and creamy feta sauce | Round 5072 | brined, smoked for 10 min then roasted at 120 °C until an internal temperature of 63 °C |
7 | 10 h rump with smoked eggplant, coriander chutney and dukkha | Rump 5130 | Rump sous vide for 10 h at 58 °C |
8 | Braised shoulder and grilled cutlet | Shoulder 5047 loin cutlet | Shoulder seared than braised in the oven at 180 °C for 2–2.5 h and cutlet grilled 2 min each side |
Stakeholder | User Need | Goal |
---|---|---|
Consumer | A premium eating experience is mostly provided by restaurants, not by home cooking especially if it is a novel product. | Adoption of dry aged sheepmeat by restaurants as a premium ingredient; facilitated through the development of premium exemplar dishes that have broad appeal to both foodservice and the consumer. |
Eating quality needs to be consistently good, a poor eating quality experience will stop repeat purchase. | Consistent delivery of good eating quality through selection of appropriate cooking methods in the restaurant setting. Facilitated through the development of exemplar cooking methods/recipes that have been validated for consumer appeal. | |
Producer | Need to sell the entire carcass, not just select cuts for dry ageing to be economically viable. | Food service demand for entire carcass, not just “premium” cuts like loin; facilitated by the development of demonstrably premium dishes using leg and secondary cuts. |
This product needs to achieve higher prices than wet-aged meat as there are extra processing costs associated with dry ageing. | Premiumization of dry aged sheepmeat through provision of a premium eating experience in restaurants. | |
Foodservice and retail butchers | Food service is unfamiliar and unaware of dry aged sheepmeat product and this needs to be addressed if foodservice is to adopt dry aged sheepmeat products. | Food service familiarity with dry aged sheepmeat and optimum preparation techniques leading to adoption coupled with delivery of good eating experiences for the consumer; initially facilitated through introductory sessions and later by development and dissemination of recipes. |
Butchering dry aged sheepmeat into retail cuts is more difficult and more time consuming than butchering lamb. Labor requirements need to be minimized to keep preparation time and costs down. | Simplification of cut preparation to save time and maximize yields, e.g., the development of dishes that use bone-in cuts. | |
Need to balance the strong flavors (rich and earthy) and high fat content of dry aged sheepmeat in order to be liked by the consumer. Simple grilled center of the plate dishes are not acceptable. | Develop a range of dishes that will complement the stronger flavor of dry aged sheepmeat. | |
Need cooking methods that will improve the texture of dry aged sheepmeat as hot/fast cooking methods can make dry aged sheepmeat unacceptably tough. | Develop cooking techniques that will enhance dry aged sheepmeat texture. |
Dry Aged Mutton Dish * | Liking | Premiumness | Frequency of Consumption |
---|---|---|---|
Score (1–9) | Score (1–5) | Score (1–6) | |
Xinjiang-style skewers | 7.77 b | 3.25 c | 3.65 a |
Greek-style pitas | 8.19 ab | 3.71 c | 3.11 a |
Sliders | 7.85 b | 3.57 c | 3.40 a |
Vietnamese-style pho | 8.62 a | 4.15 b | 2.96 b |
Piccata | 8.19 ab | 3.69 c | 3.19 ab |
Smoked mutton salad | 8.50 a | 4.73 a | 2.96 b |
10 h rump | 7.69 b | 4.27 b | 3.62 a |
Braised shoulder and grilled cutlet | 8.62 a | 4.77 a | 2.96 b |
p-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.028 |
SED | 0.262 | 0.230 | 0.281 |
Dry Aged Mutton Dish * | Quick Service | Food Truck | Cafe | Casual | Hotel | Fine Dining |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Xinjiang-style skewers | 31.8 a | 53.8 b | 42.3 abc | 76.9 ab | 69.2 b | 7.7 a |
Greek-style pitas | 38.5 b | 57.7 b | 57.7 bc | 57.7 ab | 57.7 b | 11.5 ab |
Sliders | 38.5 b | 50.0 b | 61.5 c | 53.8 ab | 65.4 b | 11.5 ab |
Vietnamese-style pho | 30.8 ab | 26.9 ab | 57.7 bc | 84.6 b | 30.8 ab | 53.8 bcd |
Piccata | 11.5 ab | 11.5 a | 53.8 abc | 61.5 ab | 53.8 b | 26.9 abc |
Smoked mutton salad | 0.0 a | 11.5 a | 23.1 a | 42.3 a | 11.5 a | 88.5 d |
10 h rump | 0.0 a | 11.5 a | 30.8 abc | 65.4 ab | 34.6 ab | 61.5 cd |
Braised shoulder and grilled cutlet | 3.8 a | 11.5 a | 26.9 ab | 50.0 ab | 30.8 ab | 96.2 d |
p-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.000 | 0.028 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Hastie, M.; Ashman, H.; Lyman, D.; Lockstone-Binney, L.; Jacob, R.; Ha, M.; Torrico, D.; Warner, R. Product Design to Enhance Consumer Liking of Cull Ewe Meat. Foods 2021, 10, 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10010096
Hastie M, Ashman H, Lyman D, Lockstone-Binney L, Jacob R, Ha M, Torrico D, Warner R. Product Design to Enhance Consumer Liking of Cull Ewe Meat. Foods. 2021; 10(1):96. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10010096
Chicago/Turabian StyleHastie, Melindee, Hollis Ashman, Dale Lyman, Leonie Lockstone-Binney, Robin Jacob, Minh Ha, Damir Torrico, and Robyn Warner. 2021. "Product Design to Enhance Consumer Liking of Cull Ewe Meat" Foods 10, no. 1: 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10010096
APA StyleHastie, M., Ashman, H., Lyman, D., Lockstone-Binney, L., Jacob, R., Ha, M., Torrico, D., & Warner, R. (2021). Product Design to Enhance Consumer Liking of Cull Ewe Meat. Foods, 10(1), 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10010096