Next Article in Journal
From Polyclonal Sera to Recombinant Antibodies: A Review of Immunological Detection of Gluten in Foodstuff
Next Article in Special Issue
Aglaomorpha quercifolia (L.) Hovenkamp & S. Linds a Wild Fern Used in Timorese Cuisine
Previous Article in Journal
Comprehensive Classification and Regression Modeling of Wine Samples Using 1H NMR Spectra
Previous Article in Special Issue
Isolation of Neuroprotective Anthocyanins from Black Chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa) against Amyloid-β-Induced Cognitive Impairment
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Research Advances on Health Effects of Edible Artemisia Species and Some Sesquiterpene Lactones Constituents

Antoaneta Trendafilova
Laila M. Moujir
Pedro M. C. Sousa
3 and
Ana M. L. Seca
Institute of Organic Chemistry with Centre of Phytochemistry, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Acad. G. Bonchev Str., bl. 9, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology, Genetics and Cell Biology, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de La Laguna, 38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Azores, 9500-321 Ponta Delgada, Portugal
cE3c—Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes/Azorean Biodiversity Group & Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Azores, Rua Mãe de Deus, 9500-321 Ponta Delgada, Portugal
LAQV-REQUIMTE, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2021, 10(1), 65;
Submission received: 27 November 2020 / Revised: 22 December 2020 / Accepted: 25 December 2020 / Published: 30 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Isolation and Identification of Bioactive Secondary Metabolites)


The genus Artemisia, often known collectively as “wormwood”, has aroused great interest in the scientific community, pharmaceutical and food industries, generating many studies on the most varied aspects of these plants. In this review, the most recent evidence on health effects of edible Artemisia species and some of its constituents are presented and discussed, based on studies published until 2020, available in the Scopus, Web of Sciences and PubMed databases, related to food applications, nutritional and sesquiterpene lactones composition, and their therapeutic effects supported by in vivo and clinical studies. The analysis of more than 300 selected articles highlights the beneficial effect on health and the high clinical relevance of several Artemisia species besides some sesquiterpene lactones constituents and their derivatives. From an integrated perspective, as it includes therapeutic and nutritional properties, without ignoring some adverse effects described in the literature, this review shows the great potential of Artemisia plants and some of their constituents as dietary supplements, functional foods and as the source of new, more efficient, and safe medicines. Despite all the benefits demonstrated, some gaps need to be filled, mainly related to the use of raw Artemisia extracts, such as its standardization and clinical trials on adverse effects and its health care efficacy.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Artemisia genus (Asteraceae family) comprise more than 2290 plant name records in the “The Plant List” database, being only 530 of these taxa with accepted Latin botanical name [1], which shows how challenging the taxonomy of this genus is. In this review, the complete accepted Latin botanical name, according to the “The Plant List” database, is presented in the first species citation, with an indication of any synonym when the latter is the one mentioned in the original publication. In the remaining citations, the genre name is abbreviated to A. and omitted the authority name. The Artemisia species are herbs and shrubs, which could be perennial, biennial and annual plants, distributed on all continents except Antarctica, mainly on Northern Hemisphere, with only 25 species on the Southern Hemisphere [2], being the Asian the zone where higher species diversity is concentrated [3,4]. They exhibit a great ability to grow on different ecosystems from the sea level to the mountains and from arid areas to wet regions, but the majority of the species live on temperate zones [2]. This ability contributed very significantly to the fact that some species of Artemisia, although originating in a specific zone, are now widely distributed. For example, Artemisia vulgaris L. is native to Europe and Asia but has now a large distribution in natural habitats worldwide, can be found in abundance in very distant areas ranging from Africa, North America to the Himalayas and Australia [5]. Some Artemisia species exhibit so high ability to adapt to new habitats that they become invasive species in these environments, posing a significant threat to biodiversity. This is the case of Artemisia princeps L. which, being native to Japan, China and Korea, is currently classified as an invasive species in Belgium and Netherlands [6] while Artemisia verlotiorum Lamotte is an alien invasive species in Croatia [7].
The use of Artemisia species in traditional medicine is well-documented [5,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17] and demonstrates the great ethnopharmacological value of this genus. Artemisia annua L. and Artemisia absinthium L. are the best known for their uses in traditional medicine around of the World. For example, A. annua is cited in several ancient books as being suitable for the treatment of consumptive fever, jaundice, summer heat wounds, tuberculosis, lice, scabies, dysentery, and hemorrhoids in addition to pain relievers, while in Iran is used as antispasmodic, carminative, or sedative remedy for children [9,16,18]. In turn, A. absinthium has been traditionally used to treat mainly gastrointestinal diseases and as anthelmintic although for example in Italy it is also used as an antiparasitic, antihypertensive and anti-inflammatory, while in France it is also used to stimulate appetite, as an antipyretic, and emmenagogue [17,19]. However, many other species are used on each continent. For example, Artemisia afra Jacq. ex Willd. is one of the most widely used herbal remedies in South Africa to treat inflammation and pain [20]. It is also used to treat various ailments including coughs, colds, asthma, fever, influenza, diabetes and malaria [20], and by certain South African traditional healers to treat rhinitis [21]. Artemisia dracunculus L. is widely used in North America, for example by the Chippewa and Costanoan Indians as abortifacient and medicine to treat chronic dysentery, heart palpitations, wounds, colic in babies, and also to strengthen hair and make it grow [22]. In the Iranian Traditional Medicine A. vulgaris is used to treat cervicitis [23], while this species is reported in the ethnobotany of Karok, Kiowa, Miwok Paiute, Pomo and Tlingit areas, as a drug with several applications such as in childbirth, steam bath for pleurisy, gonorrheal sore, cold, rheumatism, headache, a ‘worm’ medicine, pains of afterbirth [24]. The traditional use of Artemisia species in Europe is mainly as food, spices and beverages (discussed in more detail in Section 2). However, Artemisia species are also used in the treatment of various diseases, as for example Artemisia umbelliformis Lam. and Artemisia genipi Weber ex Stechm. also known as Alpine wormwoods and génépis species, that are used traditionally to fight cold fever, fatigue, dyspepsia and respiratory infections, as wound-healing agents and to treat bruises, while wines aromatized with these species stimulate appetite, promote digestion, and fight the mountain sickness [10].
Even some Artemisia species less scientifically known such as Artemisia ordosica Krasch, have significant ethnomedicinal applications. This species was recorded on the traditional Mongolian and Chinese medicine books, as having a beneficial effect on the nasal bleeding, rheumatoid arthritis, headache, sore throat and carbuncle [25] and was used by Mongolian “barefoot” doctors for nasosinusitis treatment [26]. Artemisia tripartita (Nutt.) Rydb. was reported on Native American Ethnobotany database [27] as diaphoretic and remedy to treat cold and sore throats, while Artemisia verlotiorum Lamotte, distributed in all northern hemisphere, is used in Tuscany folk medicine to treat hypertension [28], and to alleviate stomach problems in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan [29].
Artemisia species, as well as other herbal medicines, with proven pharmacological effects has been incorporated into conventional medicine. This incorporation is supported by the world health organization, which considers that traditional and complementary medicine can make a significant contribution to the goal of achieving universal health coverage by being included in the provision of essential health services [30]. Nevertheless, international research into traditional herbal medicines should be subject to the same ethical and methodological requirements as all research involving humans. Therefore, criteria to promote the safety, quality and effectiveness of the plants used in traditional medicine have been discussed and established [31,32].
Encouraged by this wide application in traditional medicine, the scientific community has dedicated itself to investigating in each Artemisia species evidence to support these applications. In the laboratory, the properties of the plant and extracts are tested using different models (in vitro, in vivo, clinical trial), and the active principles present in these species are wanted.
The result of this vast investigation showed the Artemisia species (extracts and essential oils) as exhibiting antiparasitic, anticancer and anti-inflammatory action in addition to antioxidant, wound healing, antinociceptive, immunoregulation, hepatoprotective, neuroprotective, anti-asthmatic, antidiabetic, antihypertensive, anti-adipogenic, anti-ulcerogenic, antiviral, antibacterial, antifungal, and anti-osteoporotic activities [10,11,12,13,18,19,33,34,35,36,37,38,39].
The search for bioactive compounds responsible for these biological activities has led to Artemisia species are privileged sources of compounds with highly diversified structures that exhibit a high level and diversity of biological activities, providing the basis for the development of new drugs, some of which are already used in clinical therapeutics [4,8,10,13,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47].
The Artemisia secondary metabolites belong to the several organic compounds families [44,47,48,49] such as terpenoids [14,44], mostly monoterpenes in essential oils [31,44] and sesquiterpene lactones [40,41,50], flavonoids [14,46,51,52], lignans [52,53,54,55], alkaloids [56], steroids [14,57], phenolic acids [37,47,58] and coumarins [14,53,59], all of them well known for their large range of biological activities.
Given the large number of papers published on the theme of health effects of products related to Artemisia species (plant, extracts, pure compounds, studies in vitro, in vivo and clinical trials), all publications related to in vitro studies were excluded from this review. In fact, although these studies are essential for a first assessment of the species’ potential, they are the ones that are farthest from the final objective, which is, the application in patients. Thus, the results of these studies are those that weigh less in the realistic assessment of the therapeutic effects of the plant and/or its constituents.
This review is intended to gather and discuss the most impactful research concerning the health effects of edible Artemisia species, based on their applications as food, their nutritional composition and therapeutic applications supported by clinical studies. It is also discussed the therapeutic relevance of some sesquiterpene lactones constituents of Artemisia species and its derivatives.
The method consisted of searching the Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed and Google Scholar databases for original and review articles in English language, published from 2015 to 2020, while was used to find registered clinical trials. For a systematic search, “Artemisia” as the primary keyword, associated with other keywords such as “chemical composition”, “nutritional”, “food”, “adverse effects” and “covid-19” for Section 2, Section 3, Section 4 and Section 7; “Artemisia” and “clinical trial” for Section 5; For Section 6 are used the name of each sesquiterpene lactone and terms like “biological activity”, “cancer”, “malaria”. The in vitro studies were excluded (NOT “in vitro”). More than 300 references were considered, and the most significant results discussed and presented here.

2. Use of Artemisia Species as Food, Spices, Condiments and Beverages

In addition to the traditional medicine applications, Artemisia species exhibit high food value since many of them are species used in culinary.
The most extensive use of Artemisia species as food is found in the countries of Europe, Asia (Japan, Korea, China and India) as well as in North America. The literature data describing the utilization of Artemisia species as a food, spices, condiments and beverages are summarized in Table 1.
Taxa of the A. vulgaris is collected and cultivated for different alimentary purposes [60,67,80]. Their leaves are one of the ingredients of kusa-mochi and hishi-mochi, two kinds of rice cakes or dumplings, one variant of which is called yomogi-mochi, yomogi being the Japanese name of these Artemisia species [80]. A type of soba, Japanese noodles used in soups and similar dishes, made with wheat and buckwheat also contains A. princeps, which gives it a green color. The young plants (leaves, stems, or shoot tips) of A. dracunculus, A. dracunculoides, A. vulgaris, A. japonica, A. capillaris, A. carvifolia, A. indica, A. keiskeana, A. montana, A. schmidtiana, A. tilesii, A. tridentata, A. wrightii, etc. (Table 1) can be eaten fresh in salads or cooked in soups and food supplements. Sabzi khordan is an Iranian (Persian) mixture of fresh herbs (served with lunch and dinner) that typically includes tarragon (A. dracunculus) [83]. Although the seeds of A. dracunculoides and A. tridentata are very small, they can be roasted, ground into a powder, and mixed with water or eaten raw [75]. Similarly, the seed of A. wrightii is crushed with water, made into balls and steamed [75].
On the other hand, the flavoring use of an Artemisia species is worldwide and especially of A. dracunculus (French tarragon, German tarragon, true tarragon or estragon) and closely related A. dracunculoides (Russian tarragon). The early culinary history is obscure, but the name “tarragon” is derived from tarkhūn, the Arabic name [83]. Tarragon became popular as a flavoring agent in the 16th century and is one of the most sought after herbs amongst gourmet chefs because of its delicate anise flavor, reminiscent of licorice. Herbes vénitiennes are a mixture of aromatic herbs (tarragon, chervil, parsley and sorrel) traditionally used in France to flavor butter. Tarragon vinegar is made by steeping a few fresh leafy twigs in a bottle of white wine vinegar. It is an essential ingredient of famous sauces such as béarnaise, hollandaise and tartare that classically accompany asparagus, green beans, peas and other vegetables (as tarragon cream) or chicken, meat and eggs. Leaves (preferably fresh) are used to flavor meat dishes, stews, fish dishes, salads, pickles and mustard sauces. Russian tarragon (A. dracunculoides) is very similar but more robust (and less aromatic). Tarragon is largely cultivated and commercialized as living plants in pots. Dried leaves of A. argyi are utilized as flavoring and colorant for the Chinese dish Qingtua [46], and A. ludoviciana—for sauces, gravies and as a garnish for pork and game [60,67]. Dried leaves of A. vulgaris (mugwort) make a bitter seasoning for poultry stuffing, especially for goose, and soups, and fresh leaves can be rubbed on fatty meats before roasting [61]. Some gourmands like cheese use seasoning with a mixture of wormwood (A. absinthium), thyme, and rosemary (at ratio 4:2:1) [84]. Small farmers in Lithuania are using a mix of wormwood and tansy (Tanacetum vulgare) for preservative purposes (to protect smoked meats from flies blow, other pests, and spoilage) as well as for flavoring (it gives a specific pleasant smell to the meat) [84]. The leaves of A. frigida are used by the Hopi Indians as a flavoring for sweet corn [68,76]. A. abrotanum is the sweetest Artemisia with slight lemon scent is a natural choice for seasoning cakes, pastries and vinegars [61]. Similarly, the leaves of A. pallens are delicately scented and the flowers yield a balsamic essential oil (davana) with application in baked goods, candy, chewing gum, and ice cream [61].
Many Artemisia species are applied in the preparation of different non-alcoholic beverages, giving them a bitter taste and alleged tonic properties. Thus, A. absinthium, A. abrotanum, A. agryi, A. ludoviciana, A. montana, A. tridentata, A. granatensis, etc. are consumed as herbal tea with digestive properties (Table 1). Silver wormwood (A. arborescens) and A. herba-alba are added to the green tea or the coffee in North Africa [67,78] and A. carvifolia has the same use in Asia [67]. Tarragon (A. dracunculus) is an ingredient of Georgian carbonated soft drink called Tarkhuna [75]. A. maritima, A. abrotanum, A. absinthium, A. vulgaris, etc. (Table 1) have been applied as a flavoring ingredient in beer production before the common application of hops.
Undoubtedly, the most famous Artemisia species employed in alcoholic drinks is A. absinthium, among which two are most noteworthy: vermouth and absinthe. Vermouth is a low alcoholic drink prepared from wine and a cocktail of botanical ingredients with A. absinthium as a principal component [85]. There are similar drinks in some countries of the Balkan Peninsula—pelin in Bulgaria [86] and vin pelin in Romania [87]. The spirit drink absinthe was created in French-speaking Switzerland in the late eighteenth century [88] and is produced by macerating A. absinthium leaves, anise and fennel seeds in alcohol (85 vol%) [84,89]. Wormwood (A. absinthium) is also used for the preparation of a bitter liqueur with lower content of alcohol (28–35 vol%) called pelinkovac (pelinkovec, pelinovec, pelen or pelin) and popular in Croatia, Serbia, Montenegro, Bosnia-Herzegovina, North Macedonia as well as in Slovenia [71].
Another popular herbal liqueurs in which Artemisia species present are genepy or génépi (A. genipi and related taxa such as A. glacialis and A. umbelliformis) [10] and ratafia (A. abrotanum, A. absinthium, A. arborescens and Artemisia chamaemelifolia Vill. [65].

3. Nutritional Value of Artemisia Species

As demonstrated above Artemisia species are widely consumed by human as a traditional food, a tea and dietary supplements, owing to the fact that they are rich in fatty acids, carbohydrates, dietary fiber, protein, essential amino acids, vitamins and minerals as demonstrated in Table 2.
Fatty acids (FA) have chemo-preventive effects and are pharmacologically active in chronic or degenerative diseases. Research has proved that diets rich in saturated fatty acids (SFA) are a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases unlike diets rich in monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), which reduce or inhibit such cardiovascular disease [104]. Linoleic and linolenic acids are essential for human health growth health promotion and disease prevention [104,105,106,107,108]. They could not be synthesized endogenously in the human body and therefore they need to be supplied by food. The studies on the fatty acid profile of Artemisia species (Table 2) showed a very variable fatty acid content, ranging from 3.31 mg/g FW in A. arborescens [92] to 24.7 mg/g FW in A. argyi [46]. With exception of A. jacutica [99], A. santolinifolia [100] and A. stelleriana [92], unsaturated fatty acids (UFA) predominated in all investigated species, followed by polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) and saturated fatty acids (SFA) (Table 2). Among individual compounds, linolenic and linoleic acids are the major fatty acids. These results determine Artemisia plants as a valuable source of unsaturated fatty acids with significance from both dietary and nutritional point of view. Palmitic acid was found to be the most abundant component in A. stelleriana (70%) [92], A. princeps (34.9%) [73] and A. jacutica (20.6–21.8%) [99].
Carbohydrates are important for keeping the body supply with energy and stamina. Recently, A. sphaerocephala carbohydrates have been the subject of a bibliographic review [109], showing their high nutritional value and versatility in terms of applications. For instance, the total amount of carbohydrates in A. sphaerocephala seed oil is 73% [83,110] while in A. annua is only 8% [93]. Recently, it has been found that the oil cake remaining after the extraction of essential oils from A. absinthium contains 9.4% of sugars [90]. The authors propose an application of the aqueous extracts of oil cake for the formulations of gelled desserts.
Dietary fiber possesses an ability to prevent or relieve constipation and foods containing fiber can provide other health benefits as well, such as helping to maintain a healthy weight and lowering your risk of diabetes, heart disease and some types of cancer [111]. Few Artemisia species have been studied for the content of dietary fiber (Table 2). The amount of crude fiber in the fresh A. argyi leaves, A. annua, A. herba-alba leaves and A. sibieri is 39.9 mg/g, 142 mg/g, 407.9 mg/g and 484 mg/g, respectively (Table 2).
Proteins play critical roles in cellular functions, structure and regulations of metabolic activities in all living organisms and have primary importance in the daily diets of consumers. Crude protein content was assessed in A. argyi and A. princeps [73], A. herba-alba [95,96,97], A. campestris [97], A. sieberi [101], A. frigida [96], A. tridentata ssp. wyomingensis [103] and A. annua [93]. It has been found that leaves and inflorescence of A. annua are rich in protein (27.1 and 18.4%, respectively) when compared to stems and roots (10.7 and 8.23%, respectively) [91]. The comparative study of the nutritional constituents of A. princeps and A. argyi showed significant difference in the content of free amino acids [73]. The content of the essential amino acids valine and phenylalanine is significantly higher in A. argyi (by approximately 63% and 41%, respectively) than in A. princeps. The amount of total essential amino acids is approximately 57% in A. princeps and 61% in A. argyi. γ-Aminobutyric acid is the main component in A. argyi. This acid is a natural non-protein amino acid with great therapeutic potential in neurological disorders and mental illnesses, because it acts as the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system [112]. Reflective of the protein content in the various tissues of A. annua, the highest concentration of amino acids was registered in the leaves and inflorescence and leucine was the most abundant one [91].
As can be seen in Table 2, few Artemisia species have been investigated for the presence of vitamins and minerals. Thus, the content of vitamin C (measured as ascorbic acid) in A. argyi was found to be twice higher than in A. princeps [73]. The content of vitamin E varies in the different plant parts of A. annua, from 1.19 mg/kg (stems) to 22.63 mg/kg (leaves) [91] and is significantly lower from that reported by Iqbal et al. [93]. The different values of vitamin E are probably due to the different methods used for the quantitative determination. The measured concentration of vitamin A in the different parts of A. annua was under detection limit level (<0.3 μg/100 g) [91]. Among minerals, potassium was detected in the highest concentration in all studied Artemisia species so far (Table 2) followed by calcium and magnesium (Table 2). Potassium is important in a balance for cellular metabolism and regulating transfer of nutrients to cells, maintaining blood pressure and electrolyte balance, transmitting electrochemical impulses and for the correct functioning of blood, endocrine/digestive and nervous systems, heart, kidneys, muscles and skin [113]. High levels of phosphorous were found in aerial parts of A. frigida [96] and A. sieberi [101], in A. annua leaves and inflorescence [91]. Phosphorous is an essential component to maintain electrolyte balance, correct functioning of brain cells, circulatory and digestive systems, eyes, liver, muscles, nerves and teeth/bones. A balance of magnesium, calcium and phosphorus is required for these minerals to be used effectively [113]. Regarding the microelements, iron, manganese and zinc in different amounts dominated all studied samples (Table 2). Probably, the functions of all these macro- and microelements in the body to maintain water balance and to stimulate normal movement in the intestinal tract can explain the traditional use of the Artemisia plants as an herbal tonic.

4. Adverse Effects Reported to Artemisia Species and Some Constituents

Pollen from the various Artemisia species is one of the most frequent and serious pollinosis causes in many parts of the world [114,115,116,117,118]. It has been verified as an allergen by nasal challenge and bronchial provocation tests, and these allergens have been shown to occur not only in its pollen but also in its leaves and stems. Studies on the immunological changes from Artemisia pollen allergic subjects revealed that Artemisia pollen can trigger not only allergic rhinitis but also asthma alone or both [118,119]. Almost half of the patients with autumnal pollen allergic rhinitis developed seasonal allergic asthma within 9 years [118]. The immunoelectrophoretic comparison of the allergen extracts from pollen of six Artemisia species and morphological studies on the pollen grains showed an extensive degree of similarity and cross-reactivity between the studied species [120]. Screening of both Korean and Norwegian patient sera against extracts from A. vulgaris and A. princeps showed that both groups of patients had the same pattern of reactivity towards both extracts [120]. The mugwort (A. vulgaris) pollen contained allergenic substances with IgE reactivity [121], which can cause immediate Type I allergic reactions such as anaphylactic shock [122]. Another study on the pollen collected from plants across Europe has shown that the highest levels of endotoxin were detected on A. vulgaris pollen [123]. The investigation on Artemisia pollen allergenicity revealed significant daily, seasonal and species-specific variability [124]. The analysis of Artemisia pollen concentrations evidenced the presence of a bimodal curve with two peaks. The first peak was attributed to A. vulgaris (early flowering species) and the second one—to late flowering species (A. campestris, A. annua, A. verlotiorum, etc.) [115,124]. The authors supposed that the spread of these species could affect human health, increasing the length and severity of allergenic pollen exposure in autumn.
Skin contact with some members of the genus Artemisia can cause dermatitis or other allergic reactions in some people [125,126,127,128]. Several cases of contact dermatitis are described in the literature [129,130,131,132]. Mugwort (A. vulgaris) has demonstrated a medium sensitizing capacity in guinea pigs [133]. According to Park [134], nearly 43% of patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma have positive reactions to mugwort on skin prick testing. Wormwood tea (A. absinthium) induced positive patch test reactions in 13 of 19 Compositae-allergic patients [135]. Erythema multiforme, is probably an expression of a delayed hypersensitivity reaction and appears clinically as acute or chronic dermatitis of exposed sites [127,128]. Skin contact dermatitis caused by Artemisia species is attributed to the presence of sesquiterpene lactones [129,136,137].
Absinthe and the use of wormwood extracts (A. absinthium) for food purposes were prohibited around the years 1910–1920 in many countries as their consumption was associated with a range of severe adverse symptoms called absinthism, including convulsions, blindness, hallucinations and mental deterioration [89,138,139,140]. Padosch et al. [139] reviewed the available data concerning medical and toxicological aspects experienced and discovered before the prohibition of absinthe. Numerous studies did not give a clear answer whether the toxicity is due to thujone alone, to a combination of the alcohol and thujone or whether it can be traced back to toxic components used in the manufacture of absinthe liqueur [89,140]. Nowadays, A. absinthium is permitted in foods and alcoholic beverages according to the regulation of the European Parliament and Council [141]. In addition, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) states that thujone content in alcoholic beverages, including absinthe, must not exceed 10 mg/kg [142], while the European Medicines Agency (EMA) also proposed a daily maximum intake of thujone in Absinthii herba, which was set at 3.0 mg thujone/day/person as acceptable for a maximum duration of 2 weeks in the wormwood monograph [143].
Some Artemisia species such as A. vulgaris [144], A. herba-alba [145], A. annua [146,147], A. arborescens and A. douglasiana Besser ex Besser [67] are used in regulating fertility and should be avoided in pregnancy. Thus, the consumption of A. herba-alba during pregnancy of mice offspring significantly decreased the fertility ratio and increased the weight and body size of preweaning offspring mice [148]. In addition, administration of A. herba-alba prolonged the time of completing the reflex response of surface righting, negative geotaxis, cliff avoidance and jumping test of mice offspring. In another study, treatment of pregnant rats with A. kopetdaghensis “Krasch, Popov & Lincz. ex Poljakov” hydroalcoholic extract (200 and 400 mg/kg) from the 2nd to 8th day of pregnancy led to 30 and 44% abortion in animals but had no significant effect on duration of pregnancy, average number of neonates, and weight of neonates [149]. The abortifacient effect of A. kopetdaghensis was attributed to the high content of camphor, for which is known that can crosses the placenta [150]. Gomes et al. [151] reviewed the results of non-clinical and clinical studies with artemisinin derivatives, their mechanisms of embryotoxicity and discussed the safety of their use during pregnancy. The mechanisms of embryotoxicity are not completely understood, but might not be so relevant for humans, considering the short time of treatment (3–7 days) compared with the longer period of target cell formation in the human embryo (~3 weeks).
The sesquiterpene lactone artemisinin isolated from the herb A. annua and its derivatives (artemether, arteether, and sodium artesunate) are successively applied in the malaria chemotherapy [152]. Extensive studies and meta-analyses of thousands of patients did not show serious side effects [152,153,154,155,156], although proper monitoring of adverse side effects in developing countries might not be a trivial task [155]. Common side effects were nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, which are also symptoms of malaria itself. Efferth and Kaina [157] have summarized the available data on toxicity studies (neurotoxicity, embryotoxicity, genotoxicity, hemato- and immunotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and allergic reactions) in cell culture, animals (mice, rats, rabbits, dogs, monkeys) and in human clinical trials of artemisinin and its derivatives and concluded that artemisinin did not cause toxicity if are taken in appropriate doses for short periods.

5. Therapeutic Uses of Artemisia Species Based on Clinical Trials

Encouraged by long traditional use of many Artemisia species for treatment of various ailments, research into their pharmacological effects has been carried out and seem to support the traditional applications [5,12,15,16,17]. In this regard, Artemisia species and their biologically active compounds have already been introduced as antimalarial, antioxidant, cytotoxic, antispasmodic, anthelmintic, antinociceptive, neuroprotective, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial agents, among others [16,44]. It is noteworthy that although Artemisia species have been intensively studied in vitro as cytotoxic agents, there are no reports on their clinical evaluation for cancer therapy in humans [4]. However, one report by Saeed et al. showed that supplementing pet food with an A. annua formulation (Luparte®) clearly improved survival prognosis in veterinary treatment of small tumors [158].
Nevertheless, clinical evaluations of Artemisia species for a range of other diseases have been carried out [4]. The effect of A. annua in traditional medicine in China for treating fever, inflammation and malaria [9] have been evaluated in clinical trials for stiffness and functional limitation associated with osteoarthritis of the hip and knee, pain management, experimental heterophyid infection and treatment of malaria [159,160,161].
Artemisia dracunculus has been used for glycemic control, insulin sensitivity, and insulin secretion [162] and likewise, A. princeps was evaluated for the same effects in subjects with impaired fasting glucose and mild-type 2 diabetes [163] and A. absinthium in the control of diabetes type 2 [164].
Ointments and liniments of A. absinthium can be effective in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis [165]. Based on the suppressor activity of A. absinthium compounds on tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and other interleukins [166], Krebs et al. [167] established the curative effect of this Artemisia species in patients with Crohn’s disease. There was improvement in symptoms after treatment with dried powder of the plant together with a conventional therapy, and a cardamonin present in the plant was considered responsible for the anti-inflammatory activity.
In addition to being widely used clinically to treat itching in icteric and dialytic patients, owing to its anti-histaminic and anti-allergenic effects, A. vulgaris (mugwort) lotion has also provided good results in patients with post-burn hypertrophic scars [168].
Recently, the preventive effect on hepatitis B cirrhosis of A. capillaris decoction combined with the entecavir has been evaluate by a randomized, double-blind and placebo controlled clinical trial (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR1900021521), to assess its efficacy and safety [169].
Artemisia annua and A. vulgaris are the species of the genus that produce the highest levels of allergens in their pollen, being one of the main causes of seasonal allergic rhinitis (“hayfever”). Lou et al. [170] carried out a phase III clinical trial ( identifier: NCT03990272) from March 2017 (approximately 4 months before the local natural Artemisia pollen season) to October 2017, involving patients from 13 centres across Northern China. The aim was to test the efficacy and safety of sublingual immunotherapy (SLI) with drops of A. annua for allergic rhinitis related to this plant. Results indicated that A. annua was a safe and significantly effective therapy. However, longer term follow-up is required, particularly to determine the mechanism of action.
Based in previous study where Xiao et al. [25] demonstrated using in vivo models, the ability of A. ordosica Krasch. extracts to control the allergic inflammatory response in rhinitis, clinical trials using nasal spray preparations of A. abrotanum containing its essential oils and flavonols have been performed with good results [171].
Munyangi et al. [172] published a randomized controlled clinical trial reporting far superior cure rates of A. afra and A. annua infusions than with artemisinin combination therapy (artesunate—amodiaquine), in the treatment of malaria. Contrastingly, a recent review by Toit and van der Kooy [15] concluded that tea infusions do not have in vitro activity, and in fact contain no artemisinin. Another randomized large-scale double-blind controlled trial on A. annua and A. afra tea vs. praziquantel for the treatment of schistosomiasis was documented by Munyangi et al. [173]. Controversially, Gillibert found scientific and ethical issues such as the article on schistosomiasis referring to the same ethics committee registration number as the malaria article [174].
Sensitive skin was initially believed to be an unusual reaction occurring in only a small subset of individuals. However, during recent decades, it has been shown to affect half the population of the world [175]. Accordingly, extensive in vitro, preclinical, and clinical research with artemisinin and its derivatives has been undertaken, notably into their anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory and antioxidant properties [176]. Yu et al. [177] tested the effectiveness of cosmetics containing A. annua extract in repairing sensitive skin. In this study, the xylene-induced ear swelling and human clinical efficacy tests were used, and the authors found that applications containing A. annua extract can inhibit inflammation, repair the skin barrier, improve damaged skin, and reduce redness and other sensitive skin symptoms. Aside from this, its leaves are eaten in salads in some Asian countries and in the United States, and several companies currently sell ground leaves and their extracts as dietary supplements [178].

6. Some Sesquiterpene Lactones Constituents of Artemisia Species with High Clinical Relevance

The pharmaceutical industry has always been interested in the secondary metabolites produced by plants, for the treatment of diseases, in cosmetics, dyes, fragrances and flavorings [179]. The Artemisia species are well known by its content of sesquiterpene lactones [40,41,43,50]. These family of compounds have been studied and reveal high therapeutic potential [180,181]. Here are presented some of the most studied and promise sesquiterpene lactones constituents of edible Artemisia species (does not intent to be an exhaustive list) which, due to its medicinal properties discussed above, could contributes to the benefits effects of the Artemisia species. Sesquiterpene lactones such as arglabin parthenolide, cynaropicrin, helenalin, costunolide and thapsigargin identified in species of the genus Artemisia [40,41,50,180] and other genera, exhibit high pharmacological potential, including in in vivo studies and clinical trials, as demonstrated and discussed very recently [181]. So, they will not be considered in this work. The most recent and relevant experimental evidence of other sesquiterpene lactones medical potential will be highlighted discussed below. In this selection, was considerate mainly the in vivo and clinical studies, once they are the last steps of new drugs development and their results are the most significant to drug development.
The chemical structures of the selected sesquiterpene lactones discussed below are indicated in the Figure 1.

6.1. Artemisinin and Its Derivatives

Artemisinin (1) is a sesquiterpene lactone with an unusual peroxide bridge (cadinene sub-group), that was discovered and isolated from the Chinese herb A. annua by Tu YouYou in the early 1970s [182], who was awarded the Nobel Prize in 2015, for discoveries concerning the novel artemisinin therapy against malaria.
Artemisinin (1) has low solubility in both water and oil, resulting in weak erratic absorption after oral administration. It also has a short half-life and high first-passage metabolism [183]. Therefore, preserving its pharmacophore, a series of derivatives were designed. The 5–10 times more potent hemiacetal, dihydroartemisinin (DHA, 1c), also known as dihydroqinghaosu or artenimol, is produced by reducing the lactone. Alkylation of the hemiacetal yields arteether (artemotil) and artemether, while artesunate is reached by acylation of the hemiacetal with succinic acid [184]. In in vivo systems, artesunate (1a) and artemether (1b) are converted back to dihydroartemisinin (1c). The most clinical widely used derivative is artesunate [185]. These derivatives showed better efficacy, tolerability, and oral bioavailability (all well absorbed by mouth and rapidly eliminated) than artemisinin, as well as minimal adverse effects [186,187]. Artemisinin (1) and its derivatives have been highlighted for their potent activity against species of Plasmodium genus responsible for malaria, as well as in the treatment of leishmaniasis, schistosomiasis and trypanomiasis [188,189,190]. They have also shown efficacy on several cancer lines, along with anti-inflammatory activity, modulating the immune response by regulating cell proliferation and cytokine release [191,192,193]. They also have anti-ulcerous [194], antinociceptive [195], antiviral [196], antifungal [180], and antibacterial [197] activities, besides being effective in other disorders such as respiratory [198], and related to metabolic syndromes, including obesity, diabetes and atherosclerosis [199,200], being many of the effects mentioned evaluated in in vivo models

6.1.1. Antiparasitic Activity In Vivo and Clinical Trials

Malaria is the most common tropical disease and is caused by protozoan parasites of the genus Plasmodium (P. malariae, quartan fevers; P. vivax and P. ovale, tertian fevers; P. falciparum, malignant tertians and P. knowlesi) [201]. Artemisinin (1) and its derivatives contain a 1,2,4-trioxane moiety responsible for the drug’s action mechanism [193,202], which despite intensive study remains debatable. The compound is believed to act in two phases. Firstly, the haem iron attacks and breaks its endoperoxide linkage to produce oxy and carbon free radicals. In the second step, the latter free radical alkylates specific malarial proteins, killing the parasite. artemisinin (1) also has another target, the mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum, where it inhibits PfATP6, the enzyme responsible for Ca++ delivery into vesicles. This is a parasite-encoded sarcoplasmic-endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase (SERCA), which is crucial for parasite development [193,201,202,203,204,205]. Furthermore, compound 1 exhibits a direct antiparasitic effect against several Leishmania species, by increasing NO production and iNOS expression in uninfected macrophages, and an indirect immunomodulatory effect. In addition, treatment with artemisinin (1) in a BALB/c mouse model led to significant reduction in splenic weight, a strong inhibition of parasites, and a restoration of Th1 cytokines such as interferon-γ and interleukin-2 (IL-2) [206].
The 11th World Malaria Report 2018 by the WHO estimated a 2 million increase in global malaria cases with respect to 2017. Examples of growing challenges are urban malaria, the parasite’s drug resistance, malaria in pregnancy, resistance towards insecticides, etc. [207]. Artemisinin (1) and its analogues 1a, 1b and 1c show marked activity against multidrug resistant strains of Plasmodium species and cerebral malaria both in vivo and in vitro. For this reason, the WHO recommends them as first choice treatment as part of artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) [208].
Artesunate (1a) is widely used to treat multidrug-resistant malaria [209,210]. The African Quinine Artesunate Malaria Trial multicenter study (AQUAMAT) conducted clinical trials with it in more than 5400 children under 15 years of age with severe malaria. As a result of these, the WHO revised the guidelines for malaria and recommended intravenous artesunate as a choice to treat severe malaria [211,212].
After a cluster-randomized trial carried out in several African countries, it was concluded that rectal derivative 1a takes 4–6 h to reduce parasitemia and affect progression of the disease. Consequently, when malaria patients cannot be treated orally, rectal artesunate prior to hospital referral can prevent death and disability. In fact, the WHO recommends this, to reduce the risk of death or permanent disability [213].
In 2019, as part of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in Mozambique by Dobaño et al. [214], monthly chemoprophylaxis with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus artesunate (1a) (ASSP) was tested to selectively control timing of malaria exposure during infancy. It was observed that a balanced proinflammatory and regulatory cytokine signature (probably by innate cells), around 2 years of age, is associated with a lower risk of clinical malaria. In addition, excellent results were obtained with ASSP therapy in patients affected with uncomplicated P. falciparum in India, obtaining an 84.1% cure rate. The 15% failure was due to an artemisinin-resistant isolate [215].
Recent reports highlight the capacity of iron oxide nanoparticles to enhance the efficacy of artesunate (1a). In fact, this combination was efficient to retard growth of P. falciparum at a reduced drug concentration, with significant damage to macromolecules mediated by enhanced ROS production. Its efficacy against the artemisinin-resistant strain of P. falciparum is noteworthy, which suggests artesunate can be developed into a potent therapeutic agent against multidrug-resistant strains [216]. Despite the success of artemisinin derivative artesunate (1a), the two major antimalarial policy options are dihydroartemisinin (1c)–piperaquine (DHA–PQP) and artemether (1b)–lumefantrine (AL) “first-line treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria worldwide” [217]. The benefits of DHA–PQP in children have been validated in endemic countries [218]. The AL combined therapy exerts its effects against the erythrocytic stages of Plasmodium spp. In the body, artemether (1b) is rapidly metabolized into the active metabolite dihydroartemisinin (1c). It is thought that 1b derivative provides rapid symptomatic relief by reducing the number of malarial parasites. However, lumefantrine has a much longer half-life and is believed to clear residual parasites. Extensive clinical trials of the combination were carried out against P. falciparum in China and elsewhere, the success of which led to marketing the combination worldwide under the name “Coartem”. This resulted in many independent comparative drug studies, which further confirmed its efficacy [219,220].
A prospective, open label, non-randomized, interventional clinical trial of artemether (1b)–lumefantrine (AL) combined therapy was conducted in Zambia. It involved 152 HIV-infected patients with uncomplicated falciparum malaria, who were on efavirenz-based anti-retro-viral therapy. They received a 3-day directly observed standard AL treatment and were followed up until day 63. The results showed that while AL was well tolerated and efficacious in treating uncomplicated falciparum malaria, 16.4% of the participants had a recurrent malaria episode by day 42. This highlights the need in this sub-population for additional malaria prevention measures after treatment [221].
Furthermore, a systematic review compared the efficacies of artemether (1b)–lumefantrine (AL) and dihydroartemisinin (1c)–piperaquine (DHA–PQP) with or without primaquine (PQ) on the risk of P. vivax recurrence [222]. It revealed that administration of DHA–PQP considerably reduced P. vivax recurrence by day 42, compared with AL, although at day 63 the risk of recurrence following DHA–PQP was also reduced substantially by co-administration of PQ.
Malaria causes serious maternal and fetal complications, for this reason control of infection in in pregnancy is very important. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended artemether (1b)–lumefantrine combined therapy as an additional option for treatment of pregnant women with uncomplicated malaria in the United States during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy, at the same doses recommended for non-pregnant adults [223,224].

6.1.2. Antitumor Activity In Vivo and Clinical Trials

Artemisinin (1) and its derivatives (1a, 1b and 1c) are very potent anticancer compounds, highly selective on cancer cells with almost no side effects on normal cells. This specificity is due to certain tumor cell characteristics, such as increased metabolism and the high concentration of ferrous ion required to assist their rapid proliferation. There is indeed a high concentration of transferrin, an iron transporter protein situated on the surface cell, and also a susceptibility to reactive oxygen species (ROS) [225]. Furthermore, interest in artemisinin (1) and its derivatives resides in their minimal toxicity and adverse effects, which suggest the possibility of utilizing them as antineoplastic drugs [186].
Recent studies have shown that compound 1 and derivatives inhibit the growth of numerous types of neoplasm cells, including breast, ovarian, prostate, lung, colon, leukemia, pancreas, melanoma, renal, hepatic, gastric, and CNS cancer cells. Several reviews have been published in the last few years describing the outstanding antitumor activities of artemisinin (1) and derivatives upon different pathways in human cancer cells [186,198,226,227]. Therefore, we will only point to the most relevant aspects of the in vivo and clinical trials carried out.
The antitumor mechanism of artemisinin (1) is also based on cleavage of its endoperoxide bridge by the ferrous iron in cancer cells and formation of ROS. Such free radicals produce cell alterations such as apoptosis, DNA damage, autophagy and cell cycle arrest G0/G1 [227]. They can also inhibit angiogenesis by inhibiting the secretion of VEGF, VEGFR2, and KDR/flk-1 in tumors [228,229]. They also may affect signaling pathways and transcription factors associated with tumor growth, including the Wnt/β-catenin and AMPK pathways, nitric oxide signaling, NF-κB, CREBP, MYC/MAX, mTOR, and AP-1 [230].
Some derivatives have reached the phase of clinical trials against several cancers such as breast, cervical, hepatocellular carcinoma, non-small cell lung, squamous cell laryngeal [229,231,232]. However, insufficient large-scale clinical studies have been conducted on their applications in cancer therapy.
Artenusate (1a) was used in phase I clinical trial to treat metastatic breast cancer ( identifier: NCT00764036) and concluded that 200 mg per day are recommended for future trials [233]. This compound (1a) is also being tested regarding colorectal cancer phase I (ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN05203252) and its safety and efficiency in stage II/III to the same disease ( identifier: NCT02633098), as treatment in patients with cervical dysplasia ( identifier: NCT02354534) and as treatment of HPV-associated anal intraepithelial neoplasia ( identifier: NCT03100045). Recently, Trimble et al. [234] assess for the first time the safety and efficacy of intravaginal artesunate (1a) to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3 (CIN2/3) with good results which support continuing phase II clinical ( identifier: NCT04098744). A phase-one study was also conducted to evaluate its safety and pharmacokinetic properties when administered orally in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma ( identifier: NCT02304289) [235]. One double-blind placebo-controlled trial consisted of giving human colorectal cancer patients oral compound 1a prior to surgery. During a median follow-up of 42 months, 1 patient in the artesunate group had a recurrence of colon cancer compared to 6 patients in the placebo group [236].
Artemether (1b) has also been included in a phase I/IIa study to assess its potential use in treating subjects with advanced solid tumors ( identifier: NCT02263950) [235]. Another report describes beneficial improvement in a patient with pituitary macroadenoma treated with it for 12 months [237].
The pilot clinical phase I/II trial of dihydroartemisinin (1c) [238] against advanced cervical carcinoma indicates that after three weeks of treatment in ten women, the majority showed improvement in the signs and symptoms. This included the vaginal discharge and pain, with no evidence of severe toxicity. These patients had a lower expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Ki-67 oncogenes.
Furthermore, with the goal of increasing the antineoplastic effect of these drugs, the combination of the usual chemotherapy with artemisinin or its derivatives has been investigated, showing that their multifactorial action on various pathways may improve overall activity [232]. Interestingly, Wang et al. [239], demonstrated that dihydroartemisinin (1c) improves the anticancer effect of gemcitabine, a drug used in pancreatic cancer, which develops resistance over time. They confirmed by in vitro and in vivo analysis that compound 1c induced increased growth inhibition and apoptosis 4- and 2-fold, using both drugs and alone, respectively.
Tilaoui et al. [240] observed a synergistic effect when they used vincristine and artemisinin (1), in combination, against murine mastocytoma (P815) cells. A randomized controlled trial with artesunate (1a) combine with a chemotherapy regime using vinorelbine plus cisplatin, in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLL) shown that this treatment can raise the short-term survival rate and prolong the progression time, without extra side effects [241]. Liu et al. [242] found that a combination of artesunate (1a) with lenalinomide, commonly used for the treatment of multiple myeloma, caused an impressive enhancement of antineoplastic activity in polyploid cell lines [243], while Singh and Verna [244] described significant improvement and 70% reduction in tumor size after 2 weeks of treating a patient diagnosed with stage II cancer of the larynx with the same compound 1a (50 mg). Additionally, the first long-term treatment of two patients with metastatic uveal melanoma with artesunate (1a), in combination with standard chemotherapy, was reported [245]. The standard therapy alone was ineffective in stopping tumor growth, while the disease was stabilized after adding compound 1a to this chemotherapy, followed by objective regressions of spleen and lung metastases [245].
Another characteristic of tumors and cancer cells is their ability to develop resistance to chemotherapy due to their rapid cell-division rate and genetic mutations [246]. In this context, Reungpatthanaphong et al. [247] report that artemisinin (1), artesunate, and dihydroartemisinin (1c), combined with doxorubicin and pirarubicin, increased the cytotoxic effect induced by pirarubicin or doxorubicin only in MDR cell lines. They proposed that artemisinin and its derivatives reverse the MDR phenomenon at the mitochondrial level.
Currently, another series of derivatives are being explored that present a longer plasma life and are more powerful and effective at lower concentrations. These include artemisinin dimers and trimers, hybrid compounds, and tagging of the compounds to molecules that are involved in the intracellular iron-delivery mechanism. These compounds are promising potent anticancer agents that produce significantly less side effects than conventional chemotherapeutic agents [226].

6.2. α-Santonin and Its Derivatives

Santonin (C15H18O3) (2) (Figure 1) is an eudesmanolide sesquiterpene lactone first isolated from A. santonicum by Kahler in 1830 [248], but it is much less known than artemisinin (1). Santonin exists in two isomeric forms, α-santonin and β-santonin [249], with α-santonin being the most studied form due to its higher stability [250].
Its isolation and characterization proved an arduous and grueling task for chemists at the time [251]. Its mevalonoid biosynthesis pathways has long been studied, revealing that it is formed by a methylene reduction, C-1 hydroxylation and C-3 oxidation of the precursor costunolide, sharing an identical initial pathway [252,253]. The synthesis of santonin (2) was first described by Marshall and Wuts in 1978 [250] and involved the reduction-alkylation of m-toluic acid with lithium in ammonia.
Santonin is the most abundant sesquiterpene lactone in Artemisia cina Berg ex Poljakov and was isolated from several Artemisia species [254,255,256], including some edible species such as A. absinthium, A. frigida, A. tridentata [34,255]. Artemisia santonicum is commonly referred to as “wormseed”, a name historically attributed to the plants’ anthelmintic (“worms”) activity [251]. Indeed, santonin was one of the most frequently used treatments for intestinal nematode infections up until the 1970s [257]. Nowadays santonin has fallen out of use due to a wealth of better anthelmintic therapeutics [258]. Nevertheless, santonin has been revealed to have many other bioactivities worthy of investigating. In a recent publication [259] santonin proved to have potent insect growth inhibitory effect on the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera, a widespread pest of significant agricultural and economic impact. In this work, the researchers showed that a 2 mg/mL dose of santonin in wet feed would cause a significant (~80%) decrease in larval weight compared to the control. This is explained by the results obtained from the excised midguts, which revealed that trehalase activity had decreased to 32% of the control in treated larva. Trehalase is an important enzyme in the metabolism of trehalose, an abundant simple sugar in plants. This enzyme inhibitory activity could also be allied with santonin’s effect of rupturing insect midgut cell lining [260]. Overall, this shows there is clear signs of a potential value for the compound in possible environmentally friendly pesticidal formulations, as well as a continued interest in the compound. We would also like to note the high quality of this publication, particularly in its clarity of language and presentation of data, something which is sorely missed in similar publications.
In modern times attention has mostly been devoted to α-santonin derivatives as opposed to the actual compound. This is because α-santonin’s chemical structure lends itself very well to modifications, the compound a cheap and easy to use platform for drug synthesis [261]. Indeed, two reviews were recently published [256,261] about α-santonin derivatives and how different structural changes affect their bioactivities. In vitro results are much more abundant for santonin derivatives, mainly detailing the synthesis of novel cancer therapeutic agents. Santonin tumor inhibitory derivatives have included a diacetoxy acetal form [262]; spiro-isoxazoline and spiro-isoxazolidine derivatives [263,264]; cinnamic acid derivatives [265], immunosuppressants [266]; anti-inflammatory bromoketone [267,268,269]. Given the scope of the previously cited reviews, here it will be highlighting the main recently published derivatives showing potent in vivo effects.
Regarding in vivo effects, a recently published work [270] presents an α-santonin derivative (a benzyl ether derivative containing o-bromine named (3aS,9bR)-8-((2-bromobenzyl)oxy)-6,9-dimethyl-3-methylene3a,4,5,9b-tetrahydronaphtho[1,2-b]furan-2(3H)-one) (compound 2a, Figure 1) with potent anti-inflammatory bioactivity. In this work [270], the α-santonin derivative 2a was synthesized and screened for in vitro activity where it was the most potent one and selected for further in vivo assays. This compound was administered orally to an arthritis rat model with very similar characteristics to rheumatoid arthritis human patients. Rats were treated with doses of 5 and 20 mg/kg (w/w) per day of the selected derivative 2a and monitored for arthritic disease progression. Results showed a significant improvement of arthritis symptomatology in the treated rats, with ~40% lower clinical disease scores (associated with the degree of limb swelling) and significant reduction of hind paw volume. It is also worth noting that the response seems to not be dose-dependent, since both doses tested revealed almost identical activity. After mechanistic studies, the authors attribute this effect to the selective bonding of the derivative with the active site of UbcH5c, a key enzyme for ubiquitination during TNF-α-triggered activation of the NF-κB inflammatory pathway. These results seem to indicate the potent anti-inflammatory bioactivity of this novel derivative 2a, with potential future applications in the development of a new anti-rheumatoid arthritis (RA) drug.
However, some criticism can be levelled at the work of Chen et al. [270], primarily for the way the researchers measure disease progression; their score system seems simplistic and overly reliant on somewhat subjective and qualitative observation (swelling vs. no swelling), rather than more quantitative records and measures, rendering it quite unwieldy and difficult to understand. Another addition to this work we consider beneficial would have been to include a positive control. By including a known and widely used anti-rheumatic in this in vivo assay, we could assess the bioactivity of this novel compound by comparison with a known therapeutic. We believe more studies are required in order to better understand this new agent, and hope to see clinical trials in the near future.
Novel immunosuppressant drugs are currently in very high demand due to the high cost and serious side effects of currently used therapeutics [271]. A very interesting research was published in 2017 [272], exhibiting a novel α-santonin derivative with in vivo immunosuppressant properties. In this paper [272] the authors describe the synthesis of several O-aryl/aliphatic ether, ester and amide α-santonin derivatives and the in vitro assay for immunosuppressant bioactivity, showed one particular compound exhibiting ~75–80% proliferation suppression rates for B and T lymphocytes. This derivative, a trimethyl acetate ester α-santonin analogue (compound 2b, Figure 1), was used for in vivo immunosuppression testing using BALB/c mice. Rats were injected with 6.25 mg/kg (w/w), 12.5 mg/kg (w/w) and 25 mg/kg (w/w). Rat humoral immune response was assessed by quantification of post-challenge antibody production and cell mediated immune response was assayed by post-challenge left hind footpad thickness measurement. Results were impressive: humoral response was suppressed by 28% with the lowest dose (6.25 mg/kg (w/w)), and 41% at the highest dose (25 mg/kg (w/w)); and cell mediated immune response was suppressed by ~30% in the medium and highest doses. These results were comparable to the positive control cyclophosphamide regarding humoral response but fell considerably shorter of the positive control in the cell mediated response assay. Nevertheless, these results show that the novel derivative synthesized is capable of both humoral and cell mediated immune suppression, with reasonable potency, making it a prime candidate for future drug development. More tests with this compound, particularly exploring the mode of action, which was not presented by Dangroo et al. [272] and future clinical trials are expected.
From these studies and cited reviews, it is concluded that santonin and its derivatives are highly interesting, with new papers and bioactivities being constantly researched and published. It is expected to see some of these compounds enter pre-clinical testing soon.

6.3. Achillin

Achillin (3) (Figure 1) a sesquiterpene lactone (C15H18O3) of the guaianolide class, first identified in Achillea millefolium L. (syn Achillea lanulosa Nutt.) in 1963 by White and Winter [273] and synthesized in 1967 [274].
Although achillin (3, Figure 1) is mainly extracted from plants of the Achillea genus, it has also been identified in edible Artemisia species such as A. capillaris [275], A. frigida [276], Artemisia feddei H. Lév. & Vaniot [277] and A. ludoviciana [278]. It has also been identified in plants of other species, such as Taraxacum platycarpum [279] and Anthemis scrobicularis [280]. Achillin biosynthesis pathway starts with the eudesmane skeleton of α-santonin, and involves the hydrolysis of an acetate precursor, followed by epimerization at C-11 and finishing with an allylic oxidation [281].
The first bioactivity for achillin (3) described it as a strong antifeedant agent against two grasshopper species [282]. This study showed that a concentration of only 0.5% (% dry weight) of compound 3 was enough to repell Melanoplus sanguinipes from feeding. This antifeedant effect was measured qualitatively rather than quantitatively, so it is difficult to accurately assess the full extent of the antifeedant bioactivity. Nevertheless, the rather limited preliminary study [282] was enough to show there was potential application to achillin (3). Subsequent in vitro assays followed, showing it had anti-allergic effect (IC50 = 100 µM) [279]; increasing chemosensitivity to paclitaxel, with potency comparable to known therapeutics at 100 µM concentration [283]; and antitumor against endocervical cell lines (IC50 = 160.3 μg/mL after 72 h [48].
Achillin (3) has proven to possess interesting and potent bioactivities tested in vivo. Firstly, the work of Rivero-Cruz et al. [278] showed compound 3 had potent antinociceptive effect in mice assessed using the formalin test. This work started by focusing on the effects of A. ludoviciana (edible species), showing it had strong in vivo analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects. Subsequent analysis by HPLC attributed the bioactivity to the presence of two sesquiterpene lactones being one of them achillin and the other dehydroleucodin. Regarding achillin (3), it was individually tested using the formalin assay and showed significant activity causing near 50% reduction in formalin wound time with a dose of 17.7 mg/kg (w/w). Researchers did not specify a mode of action for this activity but cited a previous work [284] attributing the effect to the NF-κB inhibition by sesquiterpene lactones. Another point of critique to the work of Rivero-Cruz et al. [278] would be the heavy emphasis on assaying the plant extract as opposed to the isolated compounds. More extensive testing with the purified compounds would be desirable, producing far more relevant and compelling results. Nevertheless, this work proved achillin possesses interesting antinociceptive bioactivity, which should be studied further, particularly in finding out its mode of action.
Another highly relevant study with achillin (3) in animal model was its effect as an inhibitor of meiosis in toad (Rhinella arenarum) oocytes was carried out by Zapata-Martínez et al. [285], where denuded toad oocytes were exposed to different concentrations of achillin prior to the necessary hormonal stimulus necessary for meiotic resumption. Results showed a marked overall decrease of germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD) in occytes with exposure to 3. It is also worth noting that the response was dose-dependent; a 6 µM concentration of achillin (3) showed a ~10% reduction of GVBD compared the control, whereas a 36 µM concentration reduced GVBD by ~35% more than control oocytes. So, it appears achillin (3) has meiosis inhibiting potential, which the authors [285] attribute to the covalent bonds formed between achillin’s partially electrophilic center and the nucleophilic center of target molecules. The meiotic inhibitors have been shown to improve human embryonic development in in-vitro fertilization procedures by allowing the embryo to have enough time to finish cytoplasmic maturation [286].
Finally, we present a very recent 2020 paper by Arias-Durán et al. [287] showing achillin’s potential as a smooth muscle cell relaxant. The authors used an ex vivo rat trachea model, where the relaxing effects of increasing concentrations of achillin (3) were measured in the rat trachea rings. The results showed achillin (3) exhibited almost identical activity to theophylline, a widely used medicine for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The effect seems to be mainly due to a release of nitric oxide and calcium channel blockade influx into the smooth muscle cells of the tracheal rings [286]. This result indicates the great potential as a smooth cell muscle relaxant, with possible applications in the treatment of asthma, bronchospasm and chronic bronchitis.
In conclusion, achillin (3) exhibits very interesting bioactivities, mainly anti-inflammatory, meiotic inhibitor, and tracheal relaxant. It is also worth noting that this compound has also been identified as the possible bioactive agent behind interesting Artemisia extracts bioactivities, such as allelopathic [276] and anticarcinogenic [275]. It would be very interesting to follow-up on these results with more assays involving the purified compound, although such would possibly require biosynthetic methods, since it is reportedly very difficult to obtain large quantities of purified achillin (3) [275]. Nevertheless, there is great potential for its future drug development, but further research is needed.

6.4. Tehranolide

Tehranolide (C15H22O6) (4) (Figure 1), also sometimes referred to as artediffusin, is a sesquiterpene lactone first isolated from the aerial parts of Artemisia diffusa Krasch. ex Poljakov (edible) [288]. Currently, based on The Plant List database, A. diffusa name is a synonym of Seriphidium diffusum (Krasch. ex Poljak.) Y.R. Ling.
A biosynthesis pathway has been suggested by [289], involving the oxidative cleavage of the Δ4 bond of a eudesmanolide derivative, followed by an internal aldol condensation, rearrangement by hydroxy addition and ending with acetal formation. Chemical synthesis has not been described for compound (4) which explains why work done with this compound is predominantly centered in a certain few labs and research groups geographically close to the relatively narrow A. diffusa natural distribution. There is continued interest in the eudesmanolide chemical synthesis and its derivatives [290,291].
Structurally, tehranolide (4) exhibits great similarity to artemisinin (1), including the presence of an endoperoxide (C-O-O-C) bridge common to both compounds. This is very noteworthy, since the endoperoxide group is reported to be vital to artemisinin anti-malarial activity [202]. This established connection between structure and function lead to the hypothesis that compound 4 could have antimalarial activity, which was investigated by Rustaiyan et al. [292,293,294], with in vivo results using the purified compound. In this work, the authors use NMRI infected with Plasmodium berghei, a widely used malaria animal model organism. The mice were injected daily with doses ranging from 1.7 g to 17 mg (total dose) of HPLC purified tehranolide (4). Results showed the lowest dose (17 mg) significantly reduced P. berghei parasitemia by ~10% (compared to negative control) 2 days after infection while the highest dose (1.7 g) significantly reduced it by ~14%. It is important to note that, even though dosages varied by a factor of 100, differences between doses were relatively small, and became almost imperceptible 10 days after infection (while still maintaining ~10% difference to negative control after 10 days). We can then conclude that although some dose-dependence effect was exhibited, it was relatively small, and that over time all doses showed almost identical effect when compared between each other.
Some criticism can be made to this work, particularly the fact that total doses were uniformly used instead of doses adjusted to mouse weight. This means that mouse weight fluctuations translated into differing compound systemic concentrations (i.e., “lighter” mice will exhibit higher compound concentrations than “heavier” mice, which could result in exacerbated effect). This ended up not being very relevant, since the results showed relatively small difference between doses, but could have definitely cast doubt upon the results if compound dose-dependency was more exuberant and should be avoided in future assays. Other points open to criticism could be the use of a relatively small sample size (n = 5, in triplicate), and the lack of usage of a positive control, in order to compare compound 4′s efficacy against known used therapeutics. Nevertheless, the work serves to prove that the in vivo anti-malarial bioactivity.
The mode of action for this compound has not been specifically described but, it is thought to be very similar to artemisinin’s (1), due to the similar structure [288]. Mechanistically, the antimalarial bioactivity results from the presence of haem or Fe2+ resulting from the P. falciparum hemolysis. The Fe2+ functions as a catalyst to the opening of the peroxide bridge of the compound, which leads to the formation of free radicals, alkylating P. falciparum proteins and eventually causing parasite death.
The bioactivity presented above exhibited by tehranolide (4) is very interesting and relevant to current society when consider the ever-increasing Plasmodium falciparum antimalarial drug resistance [295]. There is indeed an urgent need for novel antimalarial compounds which exhibit potential as a possible therapeutic and the compound 4 was considered a very promise antimalaria agent [296]. Given these facts, it would be expected to see more work done with this compound, hopefully aiming at pre-clinical testing.
Tehranolide (4) has also proven to be a very promising anticancer agent, with several recent publications supporting in vivo effect. Much like before, the initial hypothesis was derived from the structural similarity between compound 4 and artemisinin (1), whose anticancer activity is discussed above. The earliest account of 4 anticancer bioactivity was described by Noori et al. [297,298]. These papers are arguably some of the most important works on this subject, due to the in vivo nature of the assays and the immunomodulatory insights provided. In summary, a total dose of 5.64 µg of tehranolide (4) per mouse was injected intratumor in Balb/c breast cancer mouse models. Results showed this dose significantly inhibited tumor growth by ~75% compared to negative control. Treated animals also exhibited ~2.5× increase in lymphocyte proliferation, as well as ~12% decrease in CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells, an important factor in tumor tolerance [299], when compared with negative control. These results showed compound 4 had potent in vivo anticancer activity and great potential as an immunotherapeutic regulator. Subsequent follow-up work by the same research group [300] with similarly mice treated (same dose and conditions) revealed a ~80% increase in apoptosis index of tumor cells compared to untreated mice. This result confirms compound 4 indeed possesses in vivo antitumor activity by apoptosis induction (attributed to a tumor cell selective G0/G1 cycle arrest. Finally, Noori et al. [301] describe in detail the mechanism behind compound 4 anticancer activity as being linked to calmodulin and phosphodiesterase type 1 inhibition, as well as cAMP-dependent protein kinase A activity. These processes allow tehranolide (4) to selectively inhibit tumor proliferation and induce tumor cell apoptosis.
In conclusion, compound 4 has proven to have great potential as an antimalarial but mainly as anticancer therapeutic. Both of these bioactivities are extremely relevant and important in the modern medical/scientific paradigm, because of the need for novel antimalarials as previously mentioned, as well as rising cancer rates [302]. We hope to see tehranolide (4) progress into pre-clinical stages of research with regards to both of these activities.

7. Hotpoint Research: Artemisia Species and Its Constituents as Strategy to Treat COVID-19 Infection

Caused by a member of the Coronavirus family (CoV), SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) has recently posed a potential threat to the survival of human beings on Earth and was declared a global health emergency by the WHO [303]. The therapeutic strategy to treat infection by this coronavirus has used the knowledge and experience acquired in the previous epidemics caused by SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV. To date, there are no vaccines or specific antiviral agents against coronavirus infections, so it is a great challenge for scientists to find treatments for them. Repositioning of drugs already in clinical use is being studied, as a quick response to provide effective treatments in humans and assess other compounds that may be effective against the virus [304]. The WHO proposed A. annua as a possible treatment to be considered for COVID-19 treatment, however its efficacy and side-effects must be determined. Additionally, A. annua is one of the of Jinhua Qinggan granule ingredients, one of the Traditional Chinese Patent Medicines recommended in 13 therapeutic regimens of COVID-19 in China [305]. The A. argyi it was also mentioned as one of the plants that can be used by aromatherapy method of Traditional Chinese Medicine with effects of contagion prevention [306]. Scientific evidence supporting this proposal is partly based on bioactive compounds present in the plant with antiviral effects against hepatitis B, bovine viral diarrhea, and Epstein–Barr virus [307]. It also contains compounds with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties [176], which would play an important role in controlling the acute inflammatory process triggered by Covid-19 infection. Another research line requiring further attention in the context of acute Covid-19 is the efficacy of the artesunate to ameliorate bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis pathology in rats, possibly by inhibiting profibrotic molecules [308]. Other promising pointers are that A. annua showed significant activity in vitro against SARS-CoV-1-2002 (IC50 = 34.5 ± 2.6 μg/mL) [309,310]. Tea infusions of A. annua and A. afra were found to be highly active against HIV virus, although the role of artemisinin is rather limited [311], as were various Artemisia species against Herpes simplex virus type 1 [312] and A. capillaris against Hepatitis B [169]. In a recent preliminary in silico study, Rolta et al. [313] evaluated the possibility of binding artemisinin (among other compounds) to the cellular ACE-2 receptors via the spicules of the SARS-CoV-2 membrane, as well as ADMET prediction and toxicity analysis. The results obtained support the possibility that artemisinin can act as an antiviral by means of a predictable binding to the receptor, also being non-carcinogenic, non-cytotoxic and safe to administer.
Clearly, greater scientific attention is placed and needed toward A. annua and its bioactive compound/derivatives in addressing the treatment of COVID-19 and they need to be further assessed in clinical trials. Kapepula et al. recently published a review drawing attention to the path to be followed and the errors to avoid [314]. And this assessment already started. The phase II clinical study is currently underway ( identifier: NCT04530617, recruitment), aiming to evaluate the efficacy of A. annua and camostat to inhibit viral entry or replication of SARS-CoV-2 virus and their toxicity, administered immediately after COVID-19 positive testing, in mild to moderate disease patients and with high-risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension and obesity, among others.

8. Conclusions

This review starts to present an overview of Artemisia species traditional use as food, spices, condiment and beverage. The plants are mainly used in salads and tea, as well as to flavoring food and beverages. The leaves are the most used edible part, but the aerial parts, mentioned as “herb”, is also widely used. The nutritional value of Artemisia species is also presented and discussed, based on the fatty acid, proteins, sugars, minerals, and vitamin contents reported in the literature.
Studies already published show that the use of Artemisia plants is not risk-free. The allergic reactions, mainly allergic rhinitis caused by pollens and skin dermatitis caused by the presence of sesquiterpene lactones, are the most frequently reported and studied adverse effects. Absinthe drinks are reported as causing some adverse side-effects, so its content is legislated. Some Artemisia species cause reduction of fertility, so its use is not recommended during pregnancy.
The evaluation, based on clinical studies, of the Artemisia formulations effectiveness remains a hot topic. The application of integral plants or extracts as anti-inflammatory agents is deepened and the spectrum of applications broadened to, for example, the preventive effect on hepatitis B cirrhosis, treatment of malaria, anti-allergenic and glycemic control.
Concerning the Artemisia constituents, clinical and in vivo studies involving artemisinin and its derivatives show them as efficient antimalarial and anticancer agents. Additionally, the additive or synergistic interactions of artemisinin and derivatives in combination with a wide array of clinically established drugs to combat different cancer are highlighted. The high therapeutic potential is evident in the WHO proposal to investigate artemisinin and derivatives as well as A. annua to the treatment of Covid-19 infection. In addition to artemisinin and its derivatives, other sesquiterpene lactones isolated from different species of Artemisia, such as santonin, achillin and tehranolide, have been the target of further studies with a view to the development of new derivatives and their application as medicines. These compounds exhibit very interesting activities, in in vivo models, such as immunosuppressant and anti-inflammatory and potent antinociceptive effect. Achillin acts as a meiotic inhibitor and smooth muscle cell relaxant, properties very relevant to improve human embryonic development in-vitro fertilization procedures and to treat asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, respectively.
Nevertheless, although this review shows the great potential for Artemisia species as dietary supplements, functional foods, source of new and more efficient and safe drugs, further research on action mechanism and involving clinical trials on toxicity, adverse side-effects, efficacy and health care uses continue to be needed.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.L.S. and A.T.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.L.S., A.T., L.M.M., P.M.C.S.; writing—review and editing, A.M.L.S., A.T. and L.M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


This research was funded by FCT–Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, the European Union, QREN, FEDER, COMPETE, by funding the cE3c centre (UIDB/00329/2020) and the LAQV-REQUIMTE (UIDB/50006/2020) research units; Funded by RTI2018-094356-B-C21 Spanish MINECO project, co-funded by European Regional Development Fund (FEDER); And funded by the project EthnoHERBS (H2020-MSCA-RISE-2018, No. 823973).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Thanks are due to the University of Azores, University of La Laguna and Institute of Organic Chemistry with Centre of Phytochemistry, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. The Plant List, a Working List of All Plant Species. Available online: (accessed on 24 June 2020).
  2. Vallès, J.; Garcia, S.; Hidalgo, O.; Martín, J.; Pellicer, J.; Sanz, M.; Garnatje, T. Biology, genome evolution, biotechnological issues and research including applied perspectives in Artemisia (Asteraceae). In Advances in Botanical Research; Kader, J.-C., Delseny, M., Eds.; Academic Press: Burlington, NJ, USA, 2011; Volume 60, pp. 349–419. ISBN 978-0-12-385851-1. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hussain, A.; Potter, D.; Kim, S.; Hayat, M.Q.; Bokhari, S.A. Molecular phylogeny of Artemisia (Asteraceae-Anthemideae) with emphasis on undescribed taxa from Gilgit-Baltistan (Pakistan) based on nrDNA (ITS and ETS) and cpDNA (psbA-trnH) sequences. Plant Ecol. Evol. 2019, 152, 507–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Taleghani, A.; Emami, S.A.; Tayarani-Najaran, Z. Artemisia: A promising plant for the treatment of cancer. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2020, 28, 115180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ekiert, H.; Pajor, J.; Klin, P.; Rzepiela, A.; Ślesak, H.; Szopa, A. Significance of Artemisia vulgaris L. (Common Mugwort) in the History of Medicine and Its Possible Contemporary Applications Substantiated by Phytochemical and Pharmacological Studies. Molecules 2020, 25, 4415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Verloove, F.; Andeweg, R. Artemisia princeps L. (Asteraceae), an overlooked invasive Far Eastern weed in Western Europe. Gorteria 2020, 42, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  7. Boršić, I.; Milović, M.; Dujmović, I.; Bogdanović, S.; Cigić, P.; Rešetnik, I.; Nikolić, T.; Mitić, B. Preliminary check-list of invasive alien plant species (IAS) in Croatia. Nat. Croat. 2008, 17, 55–71. [Google Scholar]
  8. Nadeem, M.; Shinwari, Z.K.; Qaiser, M. Screening of folk remedies by genus Artemisia based on ethnomedicinal surveys and traditional knowledge of native communities of Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot. 2013, 45, 111–117. [Google Scholar]
  9. Sadiq, A.; Hayat, M.Q.; Ashraf, M. Ethnopharmacology of Artemisia annua L.: A review. In Artemisia Annua—Pharmacology and Biotechnology; Aftab, T., Ferreira, J., Khan, M., Naeem, M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vouillamoz, J.F.; Carlen, C.; Taglialatela-Scafati, O.; Pollastro, F.; Appendino, G. The génépi Artemisia species. Ethnopharmacology, cultivation, phytochemistry, and bioactivity. Fitoterapia 2015, 106, 231–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dib, I.; Angenot, L.; Mihamou, A.; Ziyyat, A.; Tits, M. Artemisia campestris L.: Ethnomedicinal, phytochemical and pharmacological review. J. Herb. Med. 2017, 7, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ahuja, A.; Yi, Y.-S.; Kim, M.-Y.; Cho, J.Y. Ethnopharmacological properties of Artemisia asiatica: A comprehensive review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 220, 117–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Abiri, R.; Silva, A.L.M.; De Mesquita, L.S.S.; De Mesquita, J.W.C.; Atabaki, N.; De Almeida, E.B.; Shaharuddin, N.A.; Malik, S. Towards a better understanding of Artemisia vulgaris: Botany, phytochemistry, pharmacological and biotechnological potential. Food Res. Int. 2018, 109, 403–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kumar, A.; Aswal, S.; Semwal, R.B.; Chauhan, A.; Semwal, D.K. Insights on the pharmacological, phytochemical and ethnobotanical aspects of Artemisia roxburghiana: A rather less explored but therapeutically important species of lower Himalayas. Phytochem. Rev. 2019, 18, 199–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Du Toit, A.; Van Der Kooy, F. Artemisia afra, a controversial herbal remedy or a treasure trove of new drugs? J. Ethnopharmacol. 2019, 244, 112127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Septembre-Malaterre, A.; Rakoto, M.L.; Marodon, C.; Bedoui, Y.; Nakab, J.; Simon, E.; Hoarau, L.; Savriama, S.; Strasberg, D.; Guiraud, P.; et al. Artemisia annua, a Traditional Plant Brought to Light. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Szopa, A.; Pajor, J.; Klin, P.; Rzepiela, A.; Elansary, H.O.; Al-Mana, F.A.; Mattar, M.A.; Ekiert, H. Artemisia absinthium L.—Importance in the History of Medicine, the Latest Advances in Phytochemistry and Therapeutical, Cosmetological and Culinary Uses. Plants 2020, 9, 1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Feng, X.; Cao, S.; Qiu, F.; Zhang, B.-L. Traditional application and modern pharmacological research of Artemisia annua L. Pharmacol. Ther. 2020, 216, 107650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Batiha, G.E.-S.; Olatunde, A.; El-Mleeh, A.; Hetta, H.F.; Al-Rejaie, S.; Alghamdi, S.; Zahoor, M.; Beshbishy, A.M.; Murata, T.; Zaragoza-Bastida, A.; et al. Bioactive Compounds, Pharmacological Actions, and Pharmacokinetics of Wormwood (Artemisia absinthium). Antibiotics 2020, 9, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, N.; Van Der Kooy, F.; Verpoorte, R. Artemisia afra: A potential flagship for African medicinal plants? S. Afr. J. Bot. 2009, 75, 185–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Semenya, S.S.; Maroyi, A. Ethnobotanical study of curative plants used by traditional healers to treat rhinitis in the Limpopo Province, South Africa. Afr. Health Sci. 2018, 18, 1076–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Native American Ethnobotany. Available online: (accessed on 14 October 2020).
  23. Nabimeybodi, R.; Zareshahi, R.; Tansaz, M.; Dastjerdi, M.V.; Hajimehdipoor, H. Scientific Evaluation of Medicinal Plants Used for the Treatment of Cervicitis (Qorohe- Rahem) in Iranian Traditional Medicine. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 2019, 18, 1884–1901. [Google Scholar]
  24. Native American Ethnobotany. Available online: (accessed on 14 October 2020).
  25. Xiao, B.; Wang, J.-H.; Zhou, C.-Y.; Chen, J.-M.; Zhang, N.; Zhao, N.; Han, X.-Y.; Niu, Y.-X.; Feng, Y.-B.; Du, G.-H. Ethno-medicinal study of Artemisia ordosica Krasch. (traditional Chinese/Mongolian medicine) extracts for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and nasosinusitis. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 248, 112262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xiao, B.; Bai, J.J.; Qi, L.; Lu, L.S.; Tian, X.R.; Yin, J.; Su, Y.X. Research progress on resource distribution, chemical components, and pharmacological activities of Artemisia ordosica Krasch. J. Chin. Pharm. 2016, 13, 1862–1864. [Google Scholar]
  27. Native American Ethnobotany. Available online: (accessed on 14 October 2020).
  28. Calderone, V.; Martinotti, E.; Baragatti, B.; Breschi, M.C.; Morelli, I. Vascular effects of aqueous crude extracts of Artemisia verlotorum Lamotte (Compositae): In vivo and in vitro pharmacological studies in rats. Phytother. Res. 1999, 13, 645–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hussain, A. Distribution and Molecular Phylogeny of Artemisia Plants from Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan. Ph.D. Thesis, University of International Islamic University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan, March 2019; pp. 69–70, Reg. No. 31-FBAS/PHDBT/F14. Available online: (accessed on 15 October 2020).
  30. World Health Organization. WHO Global Report on Traditional and Complementary Medicine 2019; WHO Press: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019; Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. [Google Scholar]
  31. Miller, F.G.; Emanuel, E.J.; Rosenstein, D.L.; Straus, S.E. Ethical Issues Concerning Research in Complementary and Alternative Medicine. JAMA 2004, 291, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Smith, K.; Ernst, E.; Colquhoun, D.; Sampson, W. ‘Complementary & Alternative Medicine’ (CAM): Ethical and policy issues. Bioethics 2016, 30, 60–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Martinez, M.J.A.; Bedoya, L.M.; Apaza, L.; Bermejo, P. The Artemisia L. Genus: A Review of Bioactive Essential Oils. Molecules 2012, 17, 2542–2566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Turi, C.E.; Shipley, P.R.; Murch, S.J. North American Artemisia species from the subgenus Tridentatae (Sagebrush): A phytochemical, botanical and pharmacological review. Phytochemistry 2014, 98, 9–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wan, Y.-J.; Xia, J.-X.; Tang, L. Chemical constituents, biological activities and clinical applications of Artemisia rupestris. Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi 2017, 42, 4565–4573. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kefale, A.T.; Dabe, N.E. Antidiabetic effects of artemisia species: A systematic review. Anc. Sci. Life 2017, 36, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yalçinkaya, E.; Özgüç, S.; Aydinalp, A.; Zeybek, U. The importance of Artemisia annua L. in the anticancer activity research. Ank. Univ. Eczacilik Fak. Derg. 2017, 41, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gondwe, M.; Mpalala, A.; Zongo, L.; Kamadyaapa, D.; Ndebia, E.; Sewani-Rusike, C.; Shauli, M.; Iputo, J. Investigation of anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive effects of aqueous extracts of Artemisia afra in wistar rats. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2018, 11, 190–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Koyuncu, I. Evaluation of anticancer, antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds of Artemisia absinthium L. extract. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2018, 6, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Martínez, M.J.A.; Del Olmo, L.M.B.; Ticona, L.A.; Benito, P.B. The Artemisia L. genus: A review of bioactive sesquiterpene lactones. In Studies in Natural Products Chemistry; Elsevier B.V.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; Volume 37, Chapter 2; pp. 43–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ivanescu, B.; Miron, A.; Corciova, A. Sesquiterpene Lactones from Artemisia Genus: Biological Activities and Methods of Analysis. J. Anal. Methods Chem. 2015, 2015, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Mohamed, A.H.H.; El-Sayed, M.A.; Hegazy, M.E.; Helaly, S.E.; Esmail, A.M.; Mohamed, N.S. Chemical constituents and biological activities of Artemisia herba-alba. Rec. Nat. Prod. 2010, 4, 1–25. [Google Scholar]
  43. Bora, K.S.; Sharma, A. The Genus Artemisia: A Comprehensive Review. Pharm. Biol. 2011, 49, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Nigam, M.; Atanassova, M.; Mishra, A.P.; Pezzani, R.; Devkota, H.P.; Plygun, S.; Salehi, B.; Setzer, W.N.; Sharifi-Rad, J. Bioactive Compounds and Health Benefits of Artemisia Species. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2019, 14, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Gruessner, B.M.; Cornet-Vernet, L.; Desrosiers, M.R.; Lutgen, P.; Towler, M.J.; Weathers, P.J. It is not just artemisinin: Artemisia sp. for treating diseases including malaria and schistosomiasis. Phytochem. Rev. 2019, 18, 1509–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Song, X.; Wen, X.; He, J.; Wang, J.; Li, S.; Wang, M. Phytochemical components and biological activities of Artemisia argyi. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 52, 648–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dib, I.; El Alaoui-Faris, F.E. Artemisia campestris L.: Review on taxonomical aspects, cytogeography, biological activities and bioactive compounds. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 109, 1884–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, S.-J.; Liao, Z.-X.; Tang, Z.-S.; Cui, C.-L.; Liu, H.-B.; Liang, Y.-N.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, H.-X.; Liu, Y.-R. Phytochemicals and biological activities of Artemisia sieversiana. Phytochem. Rev. 2017, 16, 441–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Koul, B.; Khatri, T. The Artemisia genus: Panacea to several maladies. In Bioactive Natural Products in Drug Discovery; Singh, J., Meshram, V., Gupta, M., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 3–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, L.; Lv, J. Phytochemistry and bioactivities of sesquiterpenoids from the Artemisia species. J. Chin. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 26, 317–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, W.; Zhao, D.-B.; Li, M.-J.; Liu, X.-H.; Wang, H.-Q. Studies on flavonoid constituents from herbs of Artemisia ordosica II. Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi 2006, 31, 1959–1961. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  52. Nurbek, S.; Murata, T.; Suganuma, K.; Ishikawa, Y.; Buyankhishig, B.; Kikuchi, T.; Byambajav, T.; Davaapurev, B.-O.; Sasaki, K.; Batkhuu, J. Isolation and evaluation of trypanocidal activity of sesquiterpenoids, flavonoids, and lignans in Artemisia sieversiana collected in Mongolia. J. Nat. Med. 2020, 74, 750–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Li, K.-M.; Dong, X.; Ma, Y.-N.; Wu, Z.H.; Yan, Y.-M.; Cheng, Y.-X. Antifungal coumarins and lignans from Artemisia annua. Fitoterapia 2019, 134, 323–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Labruzzo, A.; Cantrell, C.L.; Carrubba, A.; Ali, A.; Wedge, D.E.; Duke, S.O. Phytotoxic Lignans from Artemisia arborescens. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2018, 13, 237–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Wang, Q.; Gong, J.-H.; Hao, J.-S.; Xu, Y.-H. Structure Elucidation of a New Lignan Glycoside from Artemisia ordosica. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2019, 55, 1007–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Rashid, M.U.; Alamzeb, M.; Ali, S.; Ullah, Z.; Shah, Z.A.; Naz, I.; Khan, M.R. The chemistry and pharmacology of alkaloids and allied nitrogen compounds from Artemisia species: A review. Phytother. Res. 2019, 33, 2661–2684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Giang, P.M.; Tran, T.T.N.; Phan, T.S.; Otsuka, H.; Matsunami, K. Two new sesquiterpene lactones and other chemical constituents of Artemisia roxbughiana. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2012, 45, 115–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Megdiche-Ksouri, W.; Trabelsi, N.; Mkadmini, K.; Bourgou, S.; Noumi, A.; Snoussi, M.; Barbria, R.; Tebourbi, O.; Ksouri, R. Artemisia campestris phenolic compounds have antioxidant and antimicrobial activity. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2015, 63, 104–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Souhila, T.; Zohra, B.F.; Tahar, H.S. Identification and quantification of phenolic compounds of Artemisia herba-alba at three harvest time by HPLC–ESI–Q-TOF–MS. Int. J. Food Prop. 2019, 22, 843–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Seidemann, J. World Spice Plants: Economic Usage, Botany, Taxonomy; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005; ISBN 978-3-540-22279-8. [Google Scholar]
  61. Allen, G. The Herbalist in the Kitchen; University of Illinois Press: Champaign, IL, USA, 2010; ISBN 025209039X. [Google Scholar]
  62. Vaughan, J.; Geissler, C. The New Oxford Book of Food Plants, 2nd ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2009; ISBN 0191609498. [Google Scholar]
  63. Kains, M.G. Culinary Herbs: Their Cultivation, Harvesting, Curing and Uses; Orange Judd Company: New York, NY, USA, 1912. [Google Scholar]
  64. Fern, K. Plants for a Future: Edible & Useful Plants for a Healthier World; Permanent Publications: East Meon, UK, 2000; ISBN 9781856230117. [Google Scholar]
  65. Parada, M.; Carrió, E.; Vallès, J. Ethnobotany of food plants in the alt empordà region (Catalonia, Iberian peninsula). J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual. 2011, 84, 11–25. [Google Scholar]
  66. Wright, C.W. Artemisia. Medicinal and Aromatic Plants—Industrial Profiles; Taylor & Francis Ltd.: London, UK, 2003; ISBN 0203303067. [Google Scholar]
  67. Amidon, C.; Barnett, R.; Cathers, J.; Chambers, B.; Hamilton, L.; Kellett, A.; Kennel, E.; Montowski, J.; Thomas, M.A.; Watson, B. Artemisia: An Essential Guide from The Herb Society of America; The Herb Society of America: Kirtland, OH, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  68. Densmore, F. How Indians Use Wild Plants for Food, Medicine, & Crafts; Dover Publications: Mineola, NY, USA, 1974; ISBN 0486406709. [Google Scholar]
  69. Mladenova, O. Grapes and Wine in the Balkans: An Ethno-Linguistic Study; Harrassowitz Verlag: Wiesbaden, Germany, 1998; ISBN 978-3447040372. [Google Scholar]
  70. Koul, B.; Taak, P.; Kumar, A.; Khatri, T.; Sanyal, I. The Artemisia Genus: A Review on Traditional Uses, Phytochemical Constituents, Pharmacological Properties and Germplasm Conservation. J. Glycom. Lipidom. 2018, 7, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Pieroni, A.; Quave, C.L. Ethnobotany and Biocultural Diversities in the Balkans: Perspectives on Sustainable Rural Development and Reconciliation; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2014; ISBN 9781493914920. [Google Scholar]
  72. Tonutti, I.; Liddle, P. Aromatic plants in alcoholic beverages: A review. Flavour Fragr. J. 2010, 25, 341–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kim, J.K.; Shin, E.C.; Lim, H.J.; Choi, S.J.; Kim, C.R.; Suh, S.H.; Kim, C.J.; Park, G.G.; Park, C.S.; Kim, H.K.; et al. Characterization of nutritional composition, antioxidative capacity, and sensory attributes of Seomae Mugwort, a native Korean variety of Artemisia argyi H. Lév. & Vaniot. J. Anal. Methods Chem. 2015, 2015, 916346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Wang, J.; Seyler, B.C.; Ticktin, T.; Zeng, Y.; Ayu, K. An ethnobotanical survey of wild edible plants used by the Yi people of Liangshan Prefecture, Sichuan Province, China. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomedicine 2020, 16, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Yanovsky, E. Food Plants of the North American Indians; U.S. Dept. of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 1936.
  76. Moerman, D.E. Native American Food Plants: An Ethnobotanical Dictionary; Timber Press Inc.: Portland, OR, USA, 2010; ISBN 9781604691894. [Google Scholar]
  77. de Santayana, M.P.; Morales, R. Manzanillas ibéricas: Historia y usos tradicionales. Rev. Fitoter. 2006, 6, 143–153. [Google Scholar]
  78. Bezza, L.; Mannarino, A.; Fattarsi, K.; Mikail, C.; Abou, L.; Hadji-Minaglou, F.; Kaloustian, J. Composition chimique de l’huile essentielle d’Artemisia herba-alba provenant de la région de Biskra (Algérie). Phytothérapie 2010, 8, 277–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kunkel, G. Plants for Human Consumption: An Annotated Checklist of the Edible Phanerogams and Ferns; Koeltz Scientific Books: Koenigatein, West Germany, 1984; ISBN 9783874292160. [Google Scholar]
  80. Sanmi, S.; McCabe, S.; Satoko, I. Chado the Way of Tea: A Japanese Tea Master’s Almanac; Tuttle Publishing: North Clarendon, VT, USA, 2005; ISBN 0804837163. [Google Scholar]
  81. Xing, X.H.; Zhang, Z.M.; Hu, X.Z.; Wu, R.Q.; Xu, C. Antidiabetic effects of Artemisia sphaerocephala Krasch. gum, a novel food additive in China, on streptozotocin-induced type 2 diabetic rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2009, 125, 410–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Boggia, L.; Pignata, G.; Sgorbini, B.; Colombo, M.L.; Marengo, A.; Casale, M.; Nicola, S.; Bicchi, C.; Rubiolo, P. Artemisia umbelliformis Lam. and Génépi Liqueur: Volatile Profile as Diagnostic Marker for Geographic Origin and to Predict Liqueur Safety. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 2849–2856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Van Wyk, B.-E. Culinary Herbs and Spices of the World; The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 2013; ISBN 9780226091839. [Google Scholar]
  84. Judžentiene, A. Wormwood (Artemisia absinthium L.) oils. In Essential Oils in Food Preservation, Flavor and Safety; Elsevier Academic Press: London, UK, 2016; pp. 849–856. ISBN 9780124166448. [Google Scholar]
  85. Morata, A.; Vaquero, C.; Palomero, F.; Loira, I.; Bañuelos, M.A.; Suárez-Lepe, J.A. Technology of vermouth wines. In Alcoholic Beverages: Volume 7: The Science of Beverages; Elsevier Woodhead Publishing: Duxford, UK, 2019; pp. 35–63. ISBN 9780128152690. [Google Scholar]
  86. How Prepare Peiln. Available online: (accessed on 10 August 2020).
  87. Vin de Pelin—Preparare, Administrare, Indicații Terapeutice|LaTAIFAS. Available online: (accessed on 10 August 2020).
  88. Arnold, W.N. Absinthe. Sci. Am. 1989, 260, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Lachenmeier, D.W.; Walch, S.G.; Padosch, S.A.; Kröner, L.U. Absinthe—A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2006, 46, 365–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Veretnova, O.Y.; Gulenkova, G.S.; Chepeleva, G.G.; Fedchenko, E.A.; Rybakova, G.R. Rationale and methods of the use of Artemisia absinthium L., Ledum palustre L. and Tanacetum vulgare L. for food purposes. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; Institute of Physics Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2020; Volume 421. [Google Scholar]
  91. Brisibe, E.A.; Umoren, U.E.; Brisibe, F.; Magalhäes, P.M.; Ferreira, J.F.; Luthria, D.; Wu, X.; Prior, R.L. Nutritional characterisation and antioxidant capacity of different tissues of Artemisia annua L. Food Chem. 2009, 115, 1240–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Carvalho, I.S.; Teixeira, M.C.; Brodelius, M. Fatty acids profile of selected Artemisia spp. plants: Health promotion. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 44, 293–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Iqbal, S.; Younas, U.; Chan, K.W.; Zia-Ul-Haq, M.; Ismail, M. Chemical Composition of Artemisia annua L. Leaves and Antioxidant Potential of Extracts as a Function of Extraction Solvents. Molecules 2012, 17, 6020–6032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Ayaz, F.A.; Inceer, H.; Hayirlioglu-Ayaz, S.; Aksu-Kalmuk, N. Achene fatty acid composition in the tribe anthemideae (Asteraceae). Rom. Biotechnol. Lett. 2016, 21, 11576–11584. [Google Scholar]
  95. Boufennara, S.; Lopez, S.; Bousseboua, H.; Bodas, R.; Bouazza, L. Chemical composition and digestibility of some browse plant species collected from Algerian arid rangelands. Span. J. Agric. Res. 2012, 10, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Olson, K.A.; Murray, M.G.; Fuller, T.K. Vegetation Composition and Nutritional Quality of Forage for Gazelles in Eastern Mongolia. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2010, 63, 593–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Al-Masri, M. Nutritive evaluation of some native range plants and their nutritional and anti-nutritional components. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2013, 41, 427–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Bouazza, L.; Boufennara, S.; Bensaada, M.; Zeraib, A.; Rahal, K.; Saro, C.; Ranilla, M.J.; López, S. In vitro screening of Algerian steppe browse plants for digestibility, rumen fermentation profile and methane mitigation. Agrofor. Syst. 2020, 94, 1433–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Randalova, T.E.; Dylenova, E.P.; Renchenbyamba, S.; Zhigzhitzhapova, S.V.; Radnaeva, L.D.; Taraskin, V.V. The composition of fatty acids isolated from plants of Absinthium section of floras of Buryatia and Mongolia. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; Institute of Physics Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2019; Volume 320, p. 012057. [Google Scholar]
  100. Tsybikova, S.Z.; Randalova, T.E.; Radnaeva, L.D. Fatty acid composition of Artemisia santolinifolia Turcz. ex Bess. of flora of Buryatia. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; Institute of Physics Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2019; Volume 320, p. 012058. [Google Scholar]
  101. Towhidi, A.; Saberifar, T.; Dirandeh, E. Nutritive value of some herbage for dromedary camels in the central arid zone of Iran. Trop. Anim. Heal. Prod. 2011, 43, 617–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Ren, D.; Zhao, Y.; Nie, Y.; Yang, N.; Yang, X. Hypoglycemic and hepatoprotective effects of polysaccharides from Artemisia sphaerocephala Krasch seeds. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 69, 296–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Davies, K.G.; Bates, J.D.; Johnson, D.D.; Nafus, A.M. Influence of Mowing Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis on Winter Habitat for Wildlife. Environ. Manag. 2009, 44, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Ros, E.; Mataix, J. Fatty acid composition of nuts—implications for cardiovascular health. Br. J. Nutr. 2006, 96, S29–S35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Bourre, J.-M.; Dumont, O. Dietary oleic acid not used during brain development and in adult in rat, in contrast with sciatic nerve. Neurosci. Lett. 2003, 336, 180–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Innis, S.M. Fatty acids and early human development. Early Hum. Dev. 2007, 83, 761–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Innis, S.M. Essential fatty acids in growth and development. Prog. Lipid Res. 1991, 30, 39–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Farvid, M.S.; Ding, M.; Pan, A.; Sun, Q.; Chiuve, S.E.; Steffen, L.M.; Willett, W.C.; Hu, F.B. Dietary Linoleic Acid and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies. Circulation 2014, 130, 1568–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Kakar, M.U.; Kakar, I.U.; Mehboob, M.Z.; Zada, S.; Soomro, H.; Umair, M.; Iqbal, I.; Umer, M.; Shaheen, S.; Syed, S.F.; et al. A review on polysaccharides from Artemisia sphaerocephala Krasch seeds, their extraction, modification, structure, and applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 252, 117113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zhang, L.; Hu, X.; Miao, X.; Chen, X.; Nan, S.; Fu, H. Genome-Scale Transcriptome Analysis of the Desert Shrub Artemisia sphaerocephala. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Barber, T.M.; Kabisch, S.; Pfeiffer, A.F.H.; Weickert, M.O. The Health Benefits of Dietary Fibre. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Zhu, S.; Noviello, C.M.; Teng, J.; Walsh, R.M.; Kim, J.J.; Hibbs, R.E. Structure of a human synaptic GABAA receptor. Nature 2018, 559, 67–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Fellows, P.J. Properties of food and principles of processing. In Food Processing Technology; Elsevier: Cambridge, UK, 2017; pp. 3–200. [Google Scholar]
  114. Stach, A.; García-Mozo, H.; Prieto-Baena, J.C.; Czarnecka-Operacz, M.; Jenerowicz, D.; Silny, W.; Galán, C. Prevalence of Artemisia species pollinosis in western Poland: Impact of climate change on aerobiological trends, 1995–2004. J. Investig. Allergol. Clin. Immunol. 2007, 17, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  115. Cristofori, A.; Bucher, E.; Rossi, M.; Cristofolini, F.; Kofler, V.; Prosser, F.; Gottardini, E. The late flowering of invasive species contributes to the increase of Artemisia allergenic pollen in autumn: An analysis of 25 years of aerobiological data (1995–2019) in Trentino-Alto Adige (Northern Italy). Aerobiologia (Bologna) 2020, 36, 669–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. D’Amato, G.; Spieksma, F.T.M. Allergenic pollen in europe. Grana 1991, 30, 67–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. D’Amato, G.; Spieksma, F.T.M.; Liccardi, G.; Jäger, S.; Russo, M.; Nikkels, H.; Wuthrich, B.; Bonini, S.; Kontou-Fili, K. Pollen-related allergy in Europe. Allergy 1998, 53, 567–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Tang, R.; Sun, J.-L.; Yin, J.; Li, Z. Artemisia Allergy Research in China. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Gao, Z.; Fu, W.-Y.; Sun, Y.; Gao, B.; Wang, H.-Y.; Liu, M.; Luo, F.-M.; Zhou, X.; Jin, J.; Zhao, L.; et al. Artemisia pollen allergy in China: Component-resolved diagnosis reveals allergic asthma patients have significant multiple allergen sensitization. Allergy 2019, 74, 284–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Brandys, J.; Grimsoen, A.; Nilsen, B.M.; Smestad Paulsen, B.; Park, H.S.; Hong, C.S. Cross-reactivity between pollen extracts from six Artemisia species. Planta Med. 1993, 59, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Hirschwehr, R.; Heppner, C.; Spitzauer, S.; Sperr, W.R.; Valent, P.; Bergerd, U.; Horak, F.; Jäger, S.; Kraft, D.; Valenta, R. Identification of common allergenic structures in mugwort and ragweed pollen. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1998, 101, 196–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Ortiz, J.C.G.; Martin, P.C.; Lopez-Asunsolo, A. Allergy to foods in patients monosensitized to Artemisia pollen. Allergy 1996, 51, 927–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Oteros, J.; Bartusel, E.; Alessandrini, F.; Núñez, A.; Moreno, D.A.; Behrendt, H.; Schmidt-Weber, C.; Traidl-Hoffmann, C.; Buters, J. Artemisia pollen is the main vector for airborne endotoxin. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2019, 143, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Grewling, Ł.; Bogawski, P.; Kostecki, Ł.; Nowak, M.; Szymańska, A.; Frątczak, A. Atmospheric exposure to the major Artemisia pollen allergen (Art v 1): Seasonality, impact of weather, and clinical implications. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 713, 136611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Foster, S.; Duke, J.A. A Field Guide to Medicinal Plants and Herbs of Eastern and Central North America; Peterson, R.T., Ed.; Houghton Mifflin Harcourt: Boston, MA, USA, 2000; ISBN 0395988144, 9780395988145. [Google Scholar]
  126. Czygan, F.-C. Herbal Drugs and Phytopharmaceuticals: A Handbook for Practice on a Scientific Basis; Wichtl, M., Bisset, N.G., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2004; ISBN 0849319617, 9780849319617. [Google Scholar]
  127. Paulsen, E. Systemic allergic dermatitis caused by sesquiterpene lactones. Contact Derm. 2017, 76, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Paulsen, E. Contact sensitization from Compositae-containing herbal remedies and cosmetics. Contact Derm. 2002, 47, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Kurz, G.; Rapaport, M.J. External/internal allergy to plants (Artemisia). Contact Derm. 1979, 5, 407–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Wu, P.; He, Y.; Zeng, Z.; Yang, Z.; Li, Y. Allergic contact dermatitis by Artemisia: Report of two cases. Contact Derm. 2020, 83, 31–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Mitchell, J.C.; Dupuis, G. Allergic contact dermatitis from sesquiterpenoids of the Compositae family of plants. Br. J. Dermatol. 1971, 84, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Haw, S.; Cho, H.-R.; Lee, M.-H. Allergic contact dermatitis associated with mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris). Contact Derm. 2010, 62, 61–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Zeller, W.; de Gols, M.; Hausen, B.M. The sensitizing capacity of Compositae plants—VI: Guinea pig sensitization experiments with ornamental plants and weeds using different methods. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 1984, 277, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Park, Y.M. Relationship between sensitization to outdoor aeroallergen and month of birth. Pediatr. Allergy Respir. Dis. 2016, 15, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Lundh, K.; Hindsén, M.; Gruvberger, B.; Möller, H.; Svensson, Å.; Bruze, M. Contact allergy to herbal teas derived from Asteraceae plants. Contact Derm. 2006, 54, 196–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Amorim, M.H.R.; Gil Da Costa, R.M.; Lopes, C.; Bastos, M.M.S.M. Sesquiterpene lactones: Adverse health effects and toxicity mechanisms. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2013, 43, 559–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Denisow-Pietrzyk, M.; Pietrzyk, Ł.; Denisow, B. Asteraceae species as potential environmental factors of allergy. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 6290–6300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  138. Weisbord, S.D.; Soule, J.B.; Kimmel, P.L. Poison on line—Acute renal failure caused by oil of wormwood purchased through the internet. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997, 337, 825–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Padosch, S.A.; Lachenmeier, D.W.; Kröner, L.U. Absinthism: A fictitious 19th century syndrome with present impact. Subst. Abus. Treat. Prev. Policy 2006, 1, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Lachenmeier, D.W.; Uebelacker, M. Risk assessment of thujone in foods and medicines containing sage and wormwood—Evidence for a need of regulatory changes? Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2010, 58, 437–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. European Parliament and Council. Available online: (accessed on 12 October 2020).
  142. European Commission Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General. Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Food on Thujone. Available online: (accessed on 14 October 2020).
  143. Community Herbal Monograph on Artemisia absinthium L., Herba. EMA/HMPC/234463/2008. 2009. Available online: (accessed on 12 October 2020).
  144. De Boer, H.J.; Cotingting, C. Medicinal plants for women’s healthcare in southeast Asia: A meta-analysis of their traditional use, chemical constituents, and pharmacology. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014, 151, 747–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Almasad, M.M.; Qazan, W.S.; Daradka, H. Reproductive toxic effects of Artemisia herba alba ingestion in female Spague-dawley rats. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2007, 10, 3158–3161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Abolaji, A.O.; Eteng, M.U.; Ebong, P.E.; Brisibe, E.A.; Dar, A.; Kabir, N.; Choudhary, M.I. A safety assessment of the antimalarial herb Artemisia annua during pregnancy in wistar rats. Phyther. Res. 2013, 27, 647–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Abolaji, A.O.; Eteng, M.U.; Ebong, P.E.; Dar, A.; Farombi, E.O.; Choudhary, M.I. Artemisia annua as a possible contraceptive agent: A clue from mammalian rat model. Nat. Prod. Res. 2014, 28, 2342–2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Laadraoui, J.; Aboufatima, R.; El Gabbas, Z.; Ferehan, H.; Bezza, K.; Ait Laaradia, M.; Marhoume, F.; Wakrim, E.M.; Chait, A. Effect of Artemisia herba-alba consumption during pregnancy on fertility, morphological and behaviors of mice offspring. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 226, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Oliaee, D.; Boroushaki, M.T.; Oliaee, N.; Ghorbani, A. Evaluation of cytotoxicity and antifertility effect of Artemisia kopetdaghensis. Adv. Pharmacol. Sci. 2014, 2014, 745760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  150. Rabl, W.; Katzgraber, F.; Steinlechner, M. Camphor ingestion for abortion (case report). Forensic Sci. Int. 1997, 89, 137–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Gomes, C.; Boareto, A.C.; Dalsenter, P.R. Clinical and non-clinical safety of artemisinin derivatives in pregnancy. Reprod. Toxicol. 2016, 65, 194–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Meshnick, S.R.; Taylor, T.E.; Kamchonwongpaisan, S. Artemisinin and the antimalarial endoperoxides: From herbal remedy to targeted chemotherapy. Microbiol. Rev. 1996, 60, 301–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Alkadi, H.O. Antimalarial drug toxicity: A review. Chemotherapy 2007, 53, 385–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Adjuik, M.; Babiker, A.; Garner, P.; Olliaro, P.; Taylor, W.; White, N.; International Artemisinin Study Group. Artesunate combinations for treatment of malaria: Meta-analysis. Lancet 2004, 363, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Staedke, S.G.; Jagannathan, P.; Yeka, A.; Bukirwa, H.; Banek, K.; Maiteki-Sebuguzi, C.; Clark, T.D.; Nzarubara, B.; Njama-Meya, D.; Mpimbaza, A.; et al. Monitoring antimalarial safety and tolerability in clinical trials: A case study from Uganda. Malar. J. 2008, 7, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Ribeiro, I.R.; Olliaro, P. Safety of artemisinin and its derivatives a review of published and unpublished clinical trials. Med. Trop. 1998, 58, 50–53. [Google Scholar]
  157. Efferth, T.; Kaina, B. Toxicity of the antimalarial artemisinin and its dervatives. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2010, 40, 405–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Saeed, M.; Breuer, E.; Hegazi, M.A.; Efferth, T. Retrospective study of small pet tumors treated with Artemisia annua and iron. Int. J. Oncol. 2020, 56, 123–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Hunt, S.; Stebbings, S.; McNamara, D. An open-label six-month extension study to investigate the safety and efficacy of an extract of Artemisia annua for managing pain, stiffness and functional limitation associated with osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. N. Z. Med. J. 2016, 129, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  160. Stebbings, S.; Beattie, E.; McNamara, D.; Hunt, S. A pilot randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of an extract of Artemisia annua administered over 12 weeks, for managing pain, stiffness, and functional limitation associated with osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Clin. Rheumatol. 2016, 35, 1829–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Daddy, N.B.; Kalisya, L.M.; Bagire, P.G.; Watt, R.L.; Towler, M.J.; Weathers, P.J. Artemisia annua dried leaf tablets treated malaria resistant to ACT and i.v. artesunate: Case reports. Phytomedicine 2017, 32, 37–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Mendez, V.M.; Puebla-Perez, A.M.; Sanchez-Pena, M.J.; Gonzalez-Ortiz, L.J.; Martinez-Abundis, E.; Gonzalez-Ortiz, M. Effect of Artemisia dracunculus administration on glycemic control, insulin sensitivity, and insulin secretion in patients with impaired glucose tolerance. J. Med. Food. 2016, 19, 481–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Choi, J.Y.; Shin, S.K.; Jeon, S.M.; Jeong, T.; Baek, N.I.; Chung, H.G.; Lee, K.T.; Lee, M.K.; Choi, M.S. Dose–response study of sajabalssuk ethanol extract from Artemisia princeps Pampanini on blood glucose in subjects with impaired fasting glucose or mild type 2 diabetes. J. Med. Food. 2011, 14, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Li, Y.; Zheng, M.; Zhai, X.; Huang, Y.; Khalid, A.; Malik, A.; Shah, P.; Karim, S.; Azhar, S.; Hou, X. Effect of Gymnema sylvestre, Citrullus colocynthis and Artemisia absinthium on blood glucose and lipid profile in diabetic human. Acta Pol. Pharm. 2015, 72, 981–985. [Google Scholar]
  165. Basiri, Z.; Zeraati, F.; Esna-Ashari, F.; Mohammadi, F.; Razzaghi, K.; Araghchian, M.; Moradkhani, S. Topical effects of Artemisia absinthium ointment and liniment in comparison with piroxicam gel in patients with knee joint osteoarthritis: A randomized double-blind controlled trial. Iran. J. Med. Sci. 2017, 42, 524–531. [Google Scholar]
  166. Hatziieremia, S.; Gray, A.I.; Ferro, V.A.; Paul, A.; Plein, R. The effects of cardamonin on lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory protein production and MAP kinase and NFkappaB signaling pathways in monocytes/macro- phages. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2006, 149, 188–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  167. Krebs, S.; Omer, T.N.; Omer, B. Wormwood (Artemisia absinthium) suppresses tumour necrosis factor alpha and accelerates healing in patients with Crohn’s disease–A controlled clinical trial. Phytomedicine 2010, 17, 305–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Ogawa, R.; Hyakusoku, H.; Ogawa, N.; Nakao, C. Effectiveness of mugwort lotion for the treatment of post-burn hypertrophic scars. JPARS 2008, 61, 210–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Wu, Q.-J.; Lv, W.-L.; Li, J.-M.; Zhang, T.-T.; Zhou, W.-H.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, J.-C.; Wang, Q.-N.; Zhang, R.X.; Zhao, X.; et al. Efficacy and safety of Yin Qi San Huang antiviral decoction in chronic hepatitis B: Study protocol for a randomized, placebo controlled, double-blinded trial. Trials 2020, 21, 482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Lou, H.; Wang, X.; Wei, Q.; Zhao, C.; Xing, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Meng, J.; Zhang, S.; Zhou, H.; Mak, R.; et al. Artemisia Annua sublingual immunotherapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis: A multicenter, randomized trial. WAO J. 2020, 13, 100458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Remberg, P.; Björk, L.; Hedner, T.; Sterner, O. Characteristics, clinical effect profile and tolerability of a nasal spray preparation of Artemisia abrotanum L. for allergic rhinitis. Phytomedicine 2004, 11, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Munyangi, J.; Cornet-Vernet, L.; Idumbo, M.; Lu, C.; Lutgen, P.; Perronne, C.; Ngombe, N.; Bianga, J.; Mupenda, B.; Lalukala, P.; et al. Artemisia annua and Artemisia afra tea infusions vs. artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ) in treating Plasmodium falciparum malaria in a large scale, double blind, randomized clinical trial. Phytomedicine 2019, 57, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Munyangi, J.; Cornet-Vernet, L.; Idumbo, M.; Lud, C.; Lutgen, P.; Perronne, C.; Ngombe, N.; Bianga, J.; Mupenda, B.; Lalukala, P.; et al. Effect of Artemisia annua and Artemisia afra tea infusions on schistosomiasis in a large clinical trial. Phytomedicine 2018, 51, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Gillibert, A.; Stephane, J.; Yves, H.; Xavier, A.; Jordi, L.; Erice, C.; Gaudart Jean, G. TEMPORARY REMOVAL: Comment on A. annua and A. afra infusions vs. Artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ) in treating Plasmodium falciparum malaria in a large scale, double blind, randomized clinical trial. Phytomedicine 2019, 59, 152981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Farage, M.A. The prevalence of sensitive skin. Front. Med. 2019, 6, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Zyad, A.; Tilaoui, M.; Jaafari, A.; Oukerrou, M.A.; Mouse, H.A. More insights into the pharmacological effects of artemisinin. Phytother. Res. 2017, 32, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Yu, J.; Wang, G.; Jiang, N. Study on the repairing effect of cosmetics containing Artemisia annua on sensitive skin. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2020, 10, 8–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. El-Askarya, H.I.; Mohamed, S.S.; El-Gohari, H.M.A.; Ezzata, S.M.; Meselhya, M.R. Quinic acid derivatives from Artemisia annua L. leaves; biological activities and seasonal variation. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2020, 128, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Guerriero, G.; Berni, R.B.; Muñoz-Sanchez, A.; Apone, F.; Abdel-Salam, E.M.; Qahtan, A.A.; Alatar, A.A.; Cantini, C.; Cai, G.; Hausman, J.-F.; et al. Production of plant secondary metabolites: Examples, tips and suggestions for biotechnologists. Genes 2018, 9, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  180. Sülsen, V.P.; Martino, V.S. Overview. In Sesquiterpene Lactones: Advances in their Chemistry and Biological Aspects; Sülsen, V.P., Martino, V.S., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 3–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Moujir, L.M.; Callies, O.; Sousa, P.M.C.; Sharopov, F.; Seca, A.M.L. Applications of sesquiterpene lactones: A review of some potential success cases. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Tu, Y. From Artemisia annua L. to Artemisinins: The Discovery and Development of Artemisinins and Antimalarial Agents; Academic Press: London, UK, 2017; 468p, ISBN 9780128116562. [Google Scholar]
  183. Letchmanan, K.; Shen, S.; Ng, W.K.; Tan, R.B. Application of transglycosylated stevia and hesperidin as drug carriers to enhance biopharmaceutical properties of poorly-soluble artemisinin. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2018, 161, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Li, Y. Qinghaosu (artemisinin): Chemistry and pharmacology. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2012, 33, 1141–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  185. White, N.J. Malaria. In Antibiotics and Chemotherapy, 9th ed.; Elsevier: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2010; pp. 809–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Konstat-Korzenny, E.; Ascencio-Aragón, J.A.; Niezen-Lugo, S.; Vázquez-López, R. Artemisinin and its synthetic derivatives as a possible therapy for cancer. Med. Sci. 2018, 6, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  187. Li, Y. Artemisinin and derivatives pharmacodynamics, toxicology, pharmacokinetics, mechanism of action, resistance, and immune regulation. In Artemisinin-Based and Other Antimalarials; Li, G., Li, Y., Li, Z., Zeng, M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; Chapter 5; pp. 197–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Saeed, M.; Krishna, S.; Greten, H.J.; Kremsner, P.G.; Efferth, T. Antischistosomal activity of artemisinin derivatives in vivo and in patients. Pharmacol. Res. 2016, 110, 216–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Pérez del Villar, L.; Burguillo, F.J.; López-Abán, J.; Muro, A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of artemisinin based therapies for the treatment and prevention of schistosomiasis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e45867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Naß, J.; Efferth, T. The activity of Artemisia spp. and their constituents against Trypanosomiasis. Phytomedicine 2018, 47, 184–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Charlie-Silva, I.; Fernandes Fraceto, L.; Ferreira Silva de Melo, N. Progress in nano-drug delivery of artemisinin and its derivatives: Towards to use in immunomodulatory approaches. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2018, 4, S611–S620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Hou, L.; Huang, H. Immune suppressive properties of artemisinin family drugs. Pharmacol. Ther. 2016, 166, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  193. Wang, J.; Xu, C.; Wong, Y.K.; Li, Y.; Liao, F.; Jiang, T.; Tu, Y.Y. Artemisinin, the magic drug discovered from Traditional Chinese Medicine. Engineering 2019, 5, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Ajeigbe, K.O.; Emikpe, B.O.; Olaleye, S.B. Effects of artemisinin, with or without lumefantrine and amodiaquine on gastric ulcer healing in rat. J. Basic Clin. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2018, 29, 515–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Dehkordi, F.M.; Kaboutari, J.; Zendehdel, M.; Javdani, M. The antinociceptive effect of artemisinin on the inflammatory pain and role of GABAergic and opioidergic systems. Korean J. Pain 2019, 32, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  196. Efferth, T. Beyond malaria: The inhibition of viruses by artemisinin-type compounds. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018, 36, 1730–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Lin, L.; Mao, X.; Sun, Y.; Cui, H. Antibacterial mechanism of artemisinin/beta-cyclodextrins against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Microb. Pathog. 2018, 118, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Cheong, D.H.J.; Tan, D.W.S.; Wong, F.W.S.; Tran, T. Anti-malarial drug, artemisinin and its derivatives for the treatment of respiratory diseases. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 158, 1049012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Chen, H.; Du, H.; Chang, C.; Li, X. Artemisinin reduces atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E deficient mice. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2020, 40 (Suppl. 1), A346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Jiang, W.; Cen, Y.; Song, Y.; Li, P.; Qin, R.; Liu, C.; Zhao, Y.; Zheng, J.; Zhou, H. Artesunate attenuated progression of atherosclerosis lesion formation alone or combined with rosuvastatin through inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokines and pro-inflammatory chemokines. Phytomedicine 2016, 23, 1259–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Karri, S.; Sharma, S.; Kaur, G. Pharmacological and analytical aspects of artemisinin for malaria: Advances and challenges. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2019, 12, 339–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Rudrapal, M.; Chetia, D. Endoperoxide antimalarials: Development, structural diversity and pharmacodynamic aspects with reference to 1,2,4-trioxane-based structural scaffold. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2016, 10, 3575–3590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  203. Krishna, S.; Bustamante, L.; Haynes, R.K.; Staines, H.M. Artemisinins: Their growing importance in medicine. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2008, 29, 520–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  204. Chaturvedi, D.; Goswami, A.; Saikia, P.P.; Barua, N.C.; Rao, P.G. Artemisinin and its derivatives: A novel class of anti-malarial and anti-cancer agents. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 435–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. O’Neill, P.M.; Barton, V.E.; Ward, S.A. The molecular mechanism of action of artemisinin—The debate continues. Molecules 2010, 15, 1705–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Sen, R.; Ganguly, S.; Saha, P.; Chatterjee, M. Efficacy of artemisinin in experimental visceral leishmaniasis. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2010, 36, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. WHO. The World Malaria Report 2018; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018; Available online: (accessed on 26 October 2020).
  208. Muangphrom, P.; Seki, H.; Fukushima, E.O.; Muranaka, T. Artemisinin-based antimalarial research: Application of biotechnology to the production of artemisinin, its mode of action, and the mechanism of resistance of Plasmodium Parasites. J. Nat. Med. 2016, 70, 318–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  209. Li, Q.; Weina, P. Artesunate: The best drug in the treatment of severe and complicated malaria. Pharmaceuticals 2010, 3, 2322–2332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  210. Noubiap, J.J. Shifting from quinine to artesunate as first-line treatment of severe malaria in children and adults: Saving more lives. J. Infect. Public Health. 2014, 7, 407–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  211. Dondorp, A.M.; Fanello, C.I.; Hendriksen, I.C.E.; Gomes, E.; Seni, A.; Chhaganlal, K.D.; Bojang, K.; Olaosebikan, R.; Anunobi, N.; AQUAMAT Group; et al. Artesunate versus quinine in the treatment of severe falciparum malaria in African children (AQUAMAT): An open-label, randomised trial. Lancet 2010, 376, 1647–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  212. Ferrari, G.F.; Ntuku, H.M.; Burri, C.; Tshefu, A.K.; Duparc, S.; Hugo, P.; Mitembo, D.K.; Rossi, A.; Ngwala, P.L.; Luwawu, J.N.; et al. An operational comparative study of quinine and artesunate for the treatment of severe malaria in hospitals and health centres in the Democratic Republic of Congo: The MATIAS study. Malar. J. 2015, 14, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  213. Warsame, M.; Gyapong, M.; Mpeka, B.; Rodrigues, A.; Singlovic, J.; Babiker, A.; Mworozi, E.; Agyepong, I.; Ansah, E.; Azairwe, R.; et al. Pre-referral rectal artesunate treatment by community- based treatment providers in Ghana, Guinea-Bissau, Tanzania, and Uganda (Study 18): A cluster-randomized trial. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 63, 312–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Dobaño, C.; Nhabomba, A.J.; Manaca, M.N.; Berthoud, T.; Aguilar, R.; Quintó, L.; Barbosa, A.; Rodríguez, M.H.; Jiménez, A.; Groves, P.L.; et al. A Balanced Proinflammatory and Regulatory Cytokine Signature in Young African Children Is Associated With Lower Risk of Clinical Malaria. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019, 69, 820–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Das, S.; Manna, S.; Saha, B.; Hati, A.K.; Roy, S. Novel pfkelch13 gene polymorphism associates with artemisinin resistance in Eastern India. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019, 69, 1144–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  216. Kannan, D.; Yadav, N.; Ahmad, S.; Namdev, P.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Lochab, B.; Singh, A. Pre-clinical study of iron oxide nanoparticles fortified artesunate for efficient targeting of malarial parasite. EBioMedicine 2019, 45, 261–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  217. WHO. Guidelines for the Treatment of Malaria, 3rd ed.; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015; Available online: (accessed on 26 October 2020).
  218. Pull, L.; Lupoglazoff, J.M.; Beardmore, M.; Michel, J.F.; Buffet, P.; Bouchaud, O.; Siriez, J.Y. Artenimol–piperaquine in children with uncomplicated imported falciparum malaria: Experience from a prospective cohort. Malar. J. 2019, 18, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Leblanc, C.; Vasse, C.; Minodier, P.; Mornand, P.; Naudin, J.; Quinet, B.; Siriez, J.Y.; Sorged, F.; de Suremain, N.; Thellier, M.; et al. Management and prevention of imported malaria in children. Update of the French guidelines. Med. Mal. Infect. 2020, 50, 127–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Lingani, M.; Bonkian, L.N.; Yerbanga, I.; Kazienga, A.; Valéa, I.; Sorgho, H.; Ouédraogo, J.B.; Mens, P.F.; Schallig, H.D.F.H.; Ravinetto, R.; et al. In vivo/ex vivo efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine and artesunate-amodiaquine as first-line treatment for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in children: An open label randomized controlled trial in Burkina Faso. Malar. J. 2020, 19, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Banda, C.G.; Chaponda, M.; Mukaka, M.; Mulenga, M.; Hachizovu, S.; Kabuya, J.B.; Mulenga, J.; Sikalima, J.; Kalilani-Phiri, L.; Terlouw, D.J.; et al. Efficacy and safety of artemether–lumefantrine as treatment for Plasmodium falciparum uncomplicated malaria in adult patients on efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy in Zambia: An open label non-randomized interventional trial. Malar. J. 2019, 18, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  222. Commons, R.J.; Simpson, J.A.; Thriemer, K.; Abreha, T.; Adam, I.; Anstey, N.M.; Assefa, A.; Awab, G.R.; Baird, K.J.; Barber, B.E.; et al. The efficacy of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine and artemether-lumefantrine with and without primaquine on Plasmodium vivax recurrence: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2019, 16, 1002928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Ballard, S.-B.; Salinger, A.; Arguin, P.M.; Desai, M.; Tan, K.R. Mphc Updated CDC Recommendations for Using Artemether-Lumefantrine for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Malaria in Pregnant Women in the United States. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2018, 67, 424–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. D’Alessandro, U.; Hill, J.; Tarning, J.; Pell, C.; Webster, J.; Gutman, J.; Sevene, E. Treatment of uncomplicated and severe malaria during pregnancy. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, e133–e146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Ghantous, A.; Gali-Muhtasib, H.; Vuorela, N.; Saliba, A.; Darwiche, N. What made sesquiterpene lactones reach cancer clinical trials? Drug Discov. Today 2010, 15, 668–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Zhang, Y.; Xu, G.; Zhang, S.; Wang, D.; Prabha, P.S.; Zuo, Z. Antitumor Research on Artemisinin and Its Bioactive Derivatives. Nat. Prod. Bioprospect. 2018, 8, 303–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  227. Slezakova, S.; Ruda-Kucerova, J. Anticancer activity of artemisinin and its derivatives. Anticancer Res. 2017, 37, 5995–6003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  228. Dell’Eva, R.; Pfeffer, U.; Vene, R.; Anfosso, L.; Forlani, A.; Albini, A.; Efferth, T. Inhibition of angiogenesis in vivo and growth of Kaposi’s sarcoma xenograft tumors by the anti-malarial artesunate. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2004, 68, 2359–2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Crespo-Ortiz, M.; Wei, M. Antitumor activity of artemisinin and its derivatives: From a well-known antimalarial agent to a potential anticancer drug. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2012, 2012, 247597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Efferth, T. Artemisinin–Second career as anticancer drug? World J. Tradit. Chin. Med. 2015, 1, 2–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Bhaw-Luximon, A.; Jhurry, D. Artemisinin and its derivatives in cancer therapy: Status of progress, mechanism of action, and future perspectives. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2017, 79, 451–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Wong, Y.K.; Xu, C.; Kalesh, K.A.; He, Y.; Lin, Q.; Wong, W.S.F.; Shen, H.-M.; Wang, J. Artemisinin as an anticancer drug: Recent advances in target profiling and mechanisms of action. Med. Res. Rev. 2017, 37, 1492–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Von Hagens, C.; Walter-Sack, I.; Goeckenjan, M.; Osburg, J.; Storch-Hagenlocher, B.; Sertel, S.; Elsässer, M.; Remppis, B.A.; Edler, L.; Munzinger, J.; et al. Prospective open uncontrolled phase I study to define a well-tolerated dose of oral artesunate as add-on therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (ARTIC M33/2). Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2017, 164, 359–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Trimble, C.L.; Levinson, K.; Maldonado, L.; Donovan, M.J.; Clark, K.T.; Fu, J.; Shay, M.E.; Sauter, M.E.; Sanders, S.A.; Frantz, P.S.; et al. A first-in-human proof-of-concept trial of intravaginal artesunate to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3 (CIN2/3). Gynecol. Oncol. 2020, 157, 188–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Burlec, A.F.; Cioancă, O.; Enache, L.C.; Hăncianu, M. Promising biological activities of sesquiterpene lactones. Med. Surg. J. 2017, 121, 645–652. [Google Scholar]
  236. Krishna, S.; Ganapathi, S.; Ster, I.C.; Saeed, M.E.; Cowan, M.L.; Finlayson, C.; Kovacsevics, H.; Jansen, H.; Kremsner, P.G.; Efferth, T.; et al. A Randomised, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study of Oral Artesunate Therapy for Colorectal Cancer. EBioMedicine 2015, 2, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  237. Singh, N.P.; Panwar, V.K. Case report of a pituitary macroadenoma treated with artemether. Integr. Cancer Ther. 2006, 5, 391–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  238. Jansen, F.H.; Adoubi, I.; Comoe, K.; de Cnodder, T.; Jansen, N.; Tschulakow, A.; Efferth, T. First study of oral artenimol-R in advanced cervical cancer: Clinical benefit, tolerability and tumor markers. Anticancer Res. 2011, 31, 4417–4422. [Google Scholar]
  239. Wang, S.J.; Gao, Y.; Chen, H.; Kong, R.; Jiang, H.C.; Pan, S.H.; Xue, D.-B.; Bai, X.-W.; Sun, B. Dihydroartemisinin inactivates NF-κB and potentiates the anti-tumor effect of gemcitabine on pancreatic cancer both in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Lett. 2010, 293, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  240. Tilaoui, M.; Mouse, H.A.; Jaafari, A.; Zyad, A. Differential effect of artemisinin against cancer cell lines. Nat. Prod. Bioprospect. 2014, 4, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  241. Zhang, Z.Y.; Yu, S.-P.; Miao, L.-Y.; Huanh, X.-Y.; Zhang, X.-P.; Zhu, Y.-P.; Xia, X.-H. Artesunate combined with vinorelbine plus cisplatin in treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A randomized controlled trial. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 2008, 6, 134–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Liu, W.M.; Gravett, A.M.; Dalgleish, A.G. The antimalarial agent artesunate possesses anticancer properties that can be enhanced by combination strategies. Int. J. Cancer 2011, 128, 1471–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Beck, J.; Schwarzer, A.; Gläser, D.; Mügge, L.-O.; Uhlig, J.; Heyn, S.; Kragl, B.; Mohren, M.; Hoffmann, F.A.; Lange, T.; et al. Lenalidomide in combination with bendamustine and prednisolone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Results of a phase 2 clinical trial (OSHO-#077). J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 143, 2545–2553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Singh, N.P.; Verma, K.B. Case report of a laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with artesunate. Arch. Oncol. 2002, 10, 279–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  245. Berger, T.G.; Dieckmann, D.; Efferth, T.; Schultz, E.S.; Funk, J.O.; Baur, A.; Schuler, G. Artesunate in the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma--first experiences. Oncol. Rep. 2005, 14, 1599–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  246. Liu, B.; Wang, C.; Chen, P.; Cheng, B.; Cheng, Y. RACKI induces chemotherapy resistance in esophageal carcinoma by upregulating the PI3K/AKT pathway and Bcl-2 expression. Oncol. Targets Ther. 2018, 11, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  247. Reungpatthanaphong, P.; Mankhetkorn, S. Modulation of multidrug resistance by artemisinin, artesunate and dihydroartemisinin in K562/adr and GLC4/adr resistant cell lines. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2002, 25, 1555–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  248. Kahler, M. Ueber einen neuen Stoff im Semen Cinae. Arch. Pharm. 2006, 34, 318–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  249. Sharma, S.; Anand, N. Natural Products. In Pharmacochemistry Library Approaches to Design and Synthesis of Antiparasitic Drugs; Sharma, S., Anand, N., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1997; Volume 25, Chapter 3; pp. 71–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Marshall, J.A.; Wuts, P.G.M. Stereocontrolled total synthesis of alpha- and beta-santonin. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 1086–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Birladeanu, L. The stories of santonin and santonic acid. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1202–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Barton, D.H.R.; Moss, G.P.; Whittle, J.A. Investigations on the biosynthesis of steroids and terpenoids. Part I A preliminary study of the biosynthesis of santonin. J. Chem. Soc. C 1968, 1813–1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. De Kraker, J.W.; Franssen, M.C.; Dalm, M.C.; de Groot, A.; Bouwmeester, H.J. Biosynthesis of germacrene A carboxylic acid in chicory roots. Demonstration of a cytochrome P450 (+)-germacrene a hydroxylase and NADP+-dependent sesquiterpenoid dehydrogenase(s) involved in sesquiterpene lactone biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2001, 125, 1930–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  254. Wynn, S.G.; Fougère, B.J. Veterinary herbal medicine: A systems-based approach. In Veterinary Herbal Medicine; Wynn, S.G., Fougère, B.J., Eds.; Mosby: Saint Louis, MO, USA, 2007; Chapter 20; pp. 291–409. ISBN 978-0-323-02998-8. [Google Scholar]
  255. Sakipova, Z.; Wong, N.S.H.; Bekezhanova, T.; Sadykova; Shukirbekova, A.; Boylan, F. Quantification of santonin in eight species of Artemisia from Kazakhstan by means of HPLC-UV: Method development and validation. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, 173714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  256. Yang, D.-Z.; Du, L.-D.; Lu, Y. Santonin. In Natural Small Molecule Drugs from Plants; Du, G.-H., Ed.; PMPH Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 619–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Zhang, H.; Liu, C.; Zheng, Q. Development and application of anthelminthic drugs in China. Acta Trop. 2019, 200, 105181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Xiao, S.-H. Progress in anthelmintic agent study since the founding of the People’s Republic of China and current challenges. Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi 2009, 27, 383–389. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  259. Yu, C.; Ai, D.; Lin, R.; Cheng, S. Effects of toxic β-glucosides on carbohydrate metabolism in cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2019, 100, e21526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  260. Singh, B.; Kaur, A. Control of insect pests in crop plants and stored food grains using plant saponins: A review. LWT 2018, 87, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Wang, J.; Su, S.; Zhang, S.; Zhai, S.; Sheng, R.; Wu, W.; Guo, R. Structure-activity relationship and synthetic methodologies of α-santonin derivatives with diverse bioactivities: A mini-review. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 175, 215–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  262. Kim, S.H.; Song, J.H.; Choi, B.G.; Kim, H.-J.; Kim, T.S. Chemical modification of santonin into a diacetoxy acetal form confers the ability to induce differentiation of human promyelocytic leukemia cells via the down-regulation of NF-kappaB DNA binding activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 13117–13125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  263. Khazir, J.; Singh, P.P.; Reddy, D.M.; Hyder, I.; Shafi, S.; Sawant, S.D.; Chashoo, G.; Mahajan, A.; Alam, M.S.; Saxena, A.K.; et al. Synthesis and anticancer activity of novel spiro-isoxazoline and spiro-isoxazolidine derivatives of α-santonin. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 63, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Domingo, L.R.; Ríos-Gutiérrez, M.; Acharjee, N. A Molecular electron density theory study of the chemoselectivity, regioselectivity, and diastereofacial selectivity in the synthesis of an anticancer spiroisoxazoline derived from α-santonin. Molecules 2019, 24, 832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  265. Chen, H.; Yang, X.; Yu, Z.; Cheng, Z.; Yuan, H.; Zhao, Z.; Wu, G.; Xie, N.; Yuan, X.; Sun, Q.; et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of α-santonin derivatives as anti-hepatoma agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 149, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Chinthakindi, P.K.; Singh, J.; Gupta, S.; Nargotra, A.; Mahajan, P.; Kaul, A.; Ahmed, Z.; Koul, S.; Sangwan, P.L. Synthesis of α-santonin derivatives for diminutive effect on T and B-cell proliferation and their structure activity relationships. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 127, 1047–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Quach, H.T.; Kondo, T.; Watanabe, M.; Tamura, R.; Yajima, Y.; Sayama, S.; Ando, M.; Kataoka, T. Eudesmane-type sesquiterpene lactones inhibit nuclear translocation of the nuclear factor κB subunit RelB in response to a lymphotoxin β stimulation. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2017, 40, 1669–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  268. Coricello, A.; El-Magboub, A.; Luna, M.; Ferrario, A.; Haworth, I.S.; Gomer, C.J.; Aiello, F.; Adams, J.D. Rational drug design and synthesis of new α-santonin derivatives as potential COX-2 inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2018, 28, 993–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  269. Filomena, P.; Luca, F.; Ian, H.; Matteo, B.; Asma, E.; Angela, F.; Charles, G.; Francesca, A.; David, A.J. Naturally occurring sesquiterpene lactones and their semi-synthetic derivatives modulate PGE2 levels by decreasing COX2 activity and expression. Heliyon 2019, 5, 1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  270. Chen, H.; Wu, G.; Gao, S.; Guo, R.; Zhao, Z.; Yuan, H.; Liu, S.; Wu, J.; Lu, X.; Yuan, X.; et al. Discovery of potent small-molecule inhibitors of ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UbcH5c from α-santonin derivatives. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 60, 6828–6852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  271. Issa, F.; Schiopu, A.; Wood, K.J. Role of T cells in graft rejection and transplantation tolerance. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2010, 6, 155–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  272. Dangroo, N.A.; Singh, J.; Gupta, N.; Singh, S.; Kaul, A.; Khuroo, M.A.; Sangwan, P.L. T- and B-cell immunosuppressive activity of novel α-santonin analogs with humoral and cellular immune response in Balb/c mice. MedChemComm 2017, 8, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. White, E.H.; Winter, R.E.K. Natural products from Achillea lanulosa. Tetrahedron Lett. 1963, 4, 137–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. White, E.H.; Marx, J.N. The synthesis and stereochemistry of deacetoxymatricarin and achillin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 5511–5513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Kim, Y.S.; Bahn, K.N.; Hah, C.K.; Gang, H.I.; Ha, Y.L. Inhibition of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene induced mouse skin carcinogenesis by Artemisia capillaris. J. Food Sci. 2008, 73, T16–T20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Zhang, R.; Wang, Y.; Hou, P.; Wen, G.; Gao, Y. Physiological responses to allelopathy of aquatic stem and leaf extract of Artemisia frigida in seedling of several pasture plants. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2010, 30, 2197–2204. [Google Scholar]
  277. Kang, T.H.; Pae, H.O.; Jeong, S.J.; Yoo, J.C.; Choi, B.M.; Jun, C.D.; Chung, H.T.; Miyamoto, T.; Higuchi, R.; Kim, Y.C. Scopoletin: An inducible nitric oxide synthesis inhibitory active constituent from Artemisia feddei. Planta Med. 1999, 65, 400–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Rivero-Cruz, I.; Anaya-Eugenio, G.; Pérez-Vásquez, A.; Martínez, A.L.; Mata, R. Quantitative analysis and pharmacological effects of Artemisia ludoviciana aqueous extract and compounds. Nat. Prod. Comm. 2017, 12, 1531–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  279. Ho, C.; Choi, E.J.; Yoo, G.S.; Kim, K.-M.; Ryu, S.Y. Desacetylmatricarin, an anti-allergic component from Taraxacum platycarpum. Planta Med. 1998, 64, 577–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  280. Zaghloul, A.M.; Yusufoglu, H.S.; Salkini, M.A.A.; Alam, A. New cytotoxic sesquiterpene lactones from Anthemis scrobicularis. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2014, 16, 922–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  281. Banerjee, A.K.; Vera, W.J.; Gonzalez, N.C. Synthesis of terpenoid compounds from α-santonin. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 4761–4788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Blust, M.H.; Hopkins, T.L. Gustatory responses of a specialist and a generalist grasshopper to terpenoids of Artemisia ludoviciana. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1987, 45, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Sanchez-Carranza, J.N.; González-Maya, L.; Razo-Hernández, R.S.; Salas-Vidal, E.; Nolasco-Quintana, N.Y.; Clemente-Soto, A.F.; García-Arizmendi, L.; Sánchez-Ramos, M.; Marquina, S.; Alvarez, L. Achillin increases chemosensitivity to paclitaxel, overcoming resistance and enhancing apoptosis in human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line resistant to paclitaxel (Hep3B/PTX). Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  284. Castro, V.; Murillo, R.; Klaas, C.A.; Meunier, C.; Mora, G.; Pahl, H.L.; Merfort, I. Inhibition of the transcription factor NF-κB by sesquiterpene lactones from Podachaenium eminens 1. Planta Med. 2000, 66, 591–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Zapata-Martínez, J.; Sánchez-Toranzo, G.; Chaín, F.; Catalán, C.A.N.; Bühler, M.I. Effect of guaianolides in the meiosis reinitiation of amphibian oocytes. Zygote 2017, 25, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Li, Q.-Y.; Lou, J.; Yang, X.-G.; Lu, Y.-Q.; Lu, S.-S.; Lu, K.-H. Effect of the meiotic inhibitor cilostamide on resumption of meiosis and cytoskeletal distribution in buffalo oocytes. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2016, 174, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Arias-Durán, L.; Estrada-Soto, S.; Hernández-Morales, M.; Chávez-Silva, F.; Navarrete-Vázquez, G.; León-Rivera, I.; Perea-Arango, I.; Villalobos-Molina, R.; Ibarra-Barajas, M. Tracheal relaxation through calcium channel blockade of Achillea millefolium hexanic extract and its main bioactive compounds. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 253, 112643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Rustaiyan, A.; Sigari, H.; Jakupovic, J.; Grenz, M. A sesquiterpene lactone from Artemisia diffusa. Phytochemistry 1989, 28, 2723–2725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Rustaiyan, A.; Vahedi, M. Malaria parasites, traditional medicinal plants and artediffusin (tehranolide) as a new candidate of antimalaria agent. J. Biological. Act. Prod. Nat. 2012, 2, 200–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Barrero, A.F.; Rosales, A.; Cuerva, J.M.; Oltra, J.E. Unified synthesis of eudesmanolides, combining biomimetic strategies with homogeneous catalysis and free-radical chemistry. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1935–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  291. Patrushev, S.S.; Shakirov, M.M.; Shults, E.E. Synthetic transformations of sesquiterpene lactones 9. Synthesis of 13-(pyridinyl)eudesmanolides. Chem. Heterocycl. Comp. 2016, 52, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Rustaiyan, A.; Nahrevanian, H.; Kazemi, M. A new antimalarial agent; effect of extracts of Artemisia diffusa against Plasmodium berghei. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2009, 5, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Rustaiyan, A.; Nahrevanian, H.; Kazemi, M. Tehranolide, a sesquiterpene lactone with an endoperoxide group that probably has the same effect as the antimalarial agent artemisinin. Planta Med. 2009, 75, PD1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Rustaiyan, A.; Nahrevanian, H.; Kazemi, M. Isolation of artediffusin (tehranolide) as a new antimalarial agent. Asian J. Chem. 2011, 23, 4810–4814. [Google Scholar]
  295. Wicht, K.J.; Mok, S.; Fidock, D.A. Molecular mechanisms of drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 74, 431–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Rustaiyan, A.; Faridchehr, A.; Bakhtiyar, M. Sesquiterpene Lactones of Iranian Compositae Family (Astraceae); Their Chemical Constituents and Anti-plasmodial Properties of Tehranolide (A Review). Orient. J. Chem. 2017, 33, 2188–2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  297. Noori, S.; Taghikhani, M.; Hassan, Z.M.; Al-Lameh, A.; Mostafaei, A. Tehranolide could shift the immune response towards Th1 and modulate the intra-tumor infiltrated T regulatory cells. Iran. J. Immunol. 2009, 6, 216–224. [Google Scholar]
  298. Noori, S.; Taghikhani, M.; Hassan, Z.M.; Allameha, A.; Mostafaei, A. Tehranolide molecule modulates the immune response, reduce regulatory T cell and inhibits tumor growth in vivo. Mol. Immunol. 2010, 47, 1579–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  299. Sakaguchi, S. Naturally arising Foxp3-expressing CD25+ CD4+ regulatory T cells in immunological tolerance to self and non-self. Nat. Immunol. 2005, 6, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  300. Noori, S.; Hassan, Z.M. Tehranolide inhibits proliferation of MCF-7 human breast cancer cells by inducing G0/G1 arrest and apoptosis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2012, 52, 1987–1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  301. Noori, S.; Hassan, Z.M. Tehranolide inhibits cell proliferation via calmodulin inhibition, PDE, and PKA activation. Tumour Biol. 2014, 35, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  302. You, W.; Henneberg, M. Cancer incidence increasing globally: The role of relaxed natural selection. Evol. Appl. 2017, 11, 140–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  303. Sohrabi, C.; Alsa, Z.; O’Neill, N.; Khan, M.; Kerwan, A.; Al-Jabir, A.; Iosifidis, C.; Agha, R. World Health Organization declares global emergency: A review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Int. J. Surg. 2020, 76, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  304. Haq, F.U.; Roman, M.; Ahmad, K.; Rahman, S.U.; Shah, S.; Suleman, N.; Ullah, S.; Ahmad, I.; Ullah, W. Artemisia annua: Trials are needed for COVID-19. Phytother. Res. 2020, 34, 2423–2424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  305. Zhuang, W.; Fan, Z.; Chu, Y.; Wang, H.; Yang, Y.; Wu, L.; Sun, N.; Sun, G.; Shen, Y.; Lin, X.; et al. Chinese patent medicines in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  306. Zhao, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhou, L.; Zhou, X.; Xie, B.; Zhang, W.; Sun, J. Prevention and treatment of COVID-19 using Traditional Chinese Medicine: A review. Phytomedicine 2020, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  307. Efferth, T.; Romero, M.; Wolf, D.G.; Stamminger, T.; Marin, J.J.; Marschall, M. The antiviral activities of artemisinin and artesunate. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008, 47, 804–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  308. Wang, C.; Xuan, X.; Yao, W.; Huang, G.; Jin, J. Anti-profibrotic effects of artesunate on bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in Sprague Dawley rats. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 12, 1291–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  309. Li, S.-Y.; Chen, C.; Zhang, H.-Q.; Guo, H.-Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, L.; Zhang, X.; Hua, S.-N.; Yu, J.; Xiao, P.-G.; et al. Identification of natural compounds with antiviral activities against SARS-associated coronavirus. Antivir. Res. 2005, 67, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  310. Islam, M.T.; Sarkar, C.; El-Kersh, D.M.; Jamaddar, S.; Uddin, S.J.; Shilpi, J.A.; Mubarak, M.S. Natural products and their derivatives against coronavirus: A review of the non-clinical and pre-clinical data. Phytother. Res. 2020, 34, 2471–2492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  311. Lubbe, A.; Seibert, I.; Klimkait, T.; Van der Kooy, F. Ethnopharmacology in overdrive: The remarkable anti-HIV activity of Artemisia annua. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 141, 854–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  312. Karamoddini, M.K.; Emami, S.A.; Ghannad, M.S.; Sani, E.A.; Sahebkar, A. Antiviral activities of aerial subsets of Artemisia species against herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV1) in vitro. Asian Biomed. 2011, 5, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  313. Rolta, R.; Salaria, D.; Kumar, V.; Sourirajan, A.; Dev, K. Phytocompounds of Rheum emodi, Thymus serpyllum and Artemisia annua inhibit COVID-19 binding to ACE2 receptor: In silico approach. Res. Sq. 2020, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  314. Kapepula, P.M.; Kabengele, J.K.; Kingombe, M.; Van Bambeke, F.; Tulkens, P.M.; Sadiki, A.; Decloedt, E.H.; Zumla, A.; Tiberi, S.; Suleman, F.; et al. Artemisia spp. derivatives for COVID-19 treatment: Anecdotal use, political hype, treatment potential, challenges, and road map to randomized clinical trials. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2020, 103, 960–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Chemical structures of some sesquiterpene lactones constituents of edible Artemisia sp. and derivatives with pharmacological relevance.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of some sesquiterpene lactones constituents of edible Artemisia sp. and derivatives with pharmacological relevance.
Foods 10 00065 g001
Table 1. Application of Artemisia species as food, spices, condiments and beverages.
Table 1. Application of Artemisia species as food, spices, condiments and beverages.
SpeciesCommon NameDistribution *Edible PartUseRef.
Artemisia abrotanum L.SouthernwoodS. EuropeYoung shootsFlavoring cakes, salads and vinegars; herb tea[60,61,62,63,64,65]
A. absinthiumMugwort, common wormwood, absintheEurope, AsiaHerbSpice; flavoring beer, wine, vermouth, absinthe, liquors and aperitifs; pelinkovac[60,61,62,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72]
A. afraAfrican wormwoodAfricaHerbFlavoring; preparation of vermouth; as a tea[60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67]
Artemisia alba Turra (syn. A. camphorata Vill.)Camphor absintheS. Europe, C. Europe, N.W. AfricaHerbSpice and flavoring[60]
A. annuaQing Hao, Sweet sagewortS.E. Europe to W. Asia.LeavesEssential oil in the leaves is used as a flavoring in spirits such as vermouth; as a vegetable[67]
Artemisia arborescens (Vaill.) L.Silver wormwoodN. Africa, S. EuropeHerbSpice added to the green tea prepared by Moroccans[60,65,67]
Artemisia argyi H. Lév. & VaniotAicao, Gaiyou, Seomae mugwortN. Asia, N. Europe, N. AmericaLeaves, buds, herbAs a tea or other forms of food supplements; dried leaves as a flavoring and colorant for the Chinese dish Qingtua[46,73]
Artemisia balchanorum Krasch. TurkmeniaHerbSpice; potherb[60]
Artemisia capillaris Thunb.Yin Chen HaoE. Asia—China, Japan, KoreaLeaves, stems, shootsSoaked and boiled eaten as food supplements in times of famine[67,74]
Artemisia carvifolia Buch.-Ham. ex Roxb. E. Asia—China, Japan, HimalayasLeavesFlavoring for tea and coffee; Young plants—cooked in the spring[67]
Artemisia dracunculoides Pursh.Russian Tarragon, Tarragon, French TarragonN. America. N. Europe. N. Asia—SiberiaLeaves, seedsLeaves—raw in salads; The N. American Indians bake the leaves between hot stones and then eat them with salt water; Seed—raw or cooked as an oily texture.[62,67,68,75]
A. dracunculusTarragon, French TarragonS. Europe to W. Asia.Leaves, young shootsLeaves—raw or used as a flavoring in soups, oily foods, salads, vinegar, etc.; The young shoots can also be cooked and used as a potherb[60,62,63,66,67,70,76]
Artemisia frigida Willd.Fringed Wormwood, Prairie sagewortN. America, N. Asia.LeavesThe leaves are used by the Hopi Indians as a flavoring for sweet corn[68,76]
A. genipi.Genepi, black wormwart, black wormwood, génépi noirS. EuropeLeaves, flower headsSpice, flavoring for liqueurs[10,60,61,66,67]
Artemisia glacialis L.Glacier wormwoodC. EuropeHerb, flower headsFlavoring in vermouth and liqueurs[10,60,61,67]
Artemisia granatensis Boiss. SpainHerbHerb tea[77]
Artemisia herba-alba Asso Africa, Mediterranean areaHerbHerb tea; Flavoring tea and coffee[78]
Artemisia indica Willd. E. Asia—China, Japan, India.LeavesYoung leaves—cooked and eaten with barley; the leaves pounded with steamed rice dumplings to give a flavor and coloring[60,70]
Artemisia japonica Thunb. E. Asia—China, Japan, Korea.Young leavesRaw as a vegetable or cooked[70]
Artemisia keiskeana Miq. E. Asia—China, Japan, Korea, E. Russia.Leaves, shoot tipsCooked[67]
Artemisia ludoviciana Nutt.White Sage, Louisiana Sage, Prairie Sage, Western MugwortN. America Leaves, flowering headsFlavoring or garnish for sauces, gravies, etc.; Used like absinthe; herb tea[60,61,67,75,76]
Artemisia maritima L.Sea WormwoodEurope, E. Asia, C. Asia.LeavesSpice; flavoring in some Danish schnapps, beer and liqueurs[60,61,67]
Artemisia montana (Nakai.) Pamp. E. Asia—China, Japan.LeavesYoung leaves—cooked; herb tea[79]
Artemisia pallens Wall. ex DC.DavanaN.E. India, ThailandHerbSpice; flavoring for cakes, pastries, candy, chewing gum, ice cream, beverages, tobacco; for production of essential oil (davana oil)[60,61,67]
Artemisia pontica L.Roman wormwood; Small absintheS.E. Europe to Siberia, C. AsiaLeaves, herbSpice, flavoring, like A. absinthium[60,61,66,67]
A. princepsMugwort mochi, YomogiE. Asia—China, Japan, Korea.Leaves, young seedlingsRaw or cooked in salads and soups; for flavoring and coloring of rice dumplings (‘mochi’)[60,67,80]
Artemisia schmidtiana Maxim.Sagebrush, Silvermound, Wormwood, MugwortE. Asia—Japan.StemsCooked; for flavoring and coloring of rice dumplings (‘mochi’)[78,80]
Artemisia sphaerocephala Krasch. ChinaSeedSeed powder added to noodles and other traditional Chinese foods to improve sensory qualities such as elasticity and chewing quality[81]
Artemisia tilesii Ledeb.Wormwood, Tilesius’ wormwoodE. Asia, N.W. America.Leaves, shootsThe fresh shoots are peeled and eaten, usually with oil; Flavoring rice dumplings[67]
Artemisia tridentata Nutt.Sage Brush, Big sagebrush, Bonneville big sagebrushN. AmericaLeaves, seedsLeaves—cooked, as a condiment and to make a tea with sage-like flavor; Seed—can be roasted then ground into a powder and mixed with water or eaten raw[61,75,76]
A. umbelliformis (syn. A. mutellina Vill.)Alpine WormwoodEurope—Alps, N. ApenninesHerb, leaves, flower headsAs a condiment; preparation of a tea and a liqueur, often with the addition of absinthe[10,60,66,67,82]
Artemisia vallesiaca All.Alpine Wormwood, Valais wormwoodEurope—N. Italy, Switzerland, S. E. FranceHerbFlavoring for liqueurs; product of santonin[10,60,66]
A. vulgarisMugwort, Common wormwood, Felon Herb, Chrysanthemum Weed, Wild WormwoodTemperate regions of Europe and AsiaLeaves, young shoots, flowering topsFlavoring fatty foods; to give color and flavor to rice dumplings (‘mochi’); as a potherb; flavoring in beer and liqueurs[60,61,66,67,70,71,80]
Artemisia wrightii A. Gray. N. AmericaLeaves, seedsRaw or cooked—an oily texture; Seed—ground with water, made into balls and steamed[75]
* S.—south; E.—east; C.—central; N.—north; W—west; S. E.—south-east; N.W.—north-west; N. E.—north-east.
Table 2. Nutritional composition of some edible Artemisia species.
Table 2. Nutritional composition of some edible Artemisia species.
Plant SpeciesPlant PartNutrient Composition *Ref.
A. absinthiumOil cake **Sugars (9.4%)[90]
A. annuaLeavesProtein (27.1%); TAA (27.6%), EAA (16.1%), NEAA (11.5%);
Crude fat (8.34%);
Minerals: K (26.3 mg/g DM), Ca (11.5 mg/g DM), Mg (7.1 mg/g DM), P (7.1 mg/g DM), S (3.9 mg/g DM), Fe (0.2 mg/g DM), Mn (0.2 mg/g DM), Zn (0.06 mg/g DM);
Vitamin A (<0.3 μg/100 g DM); Vitamin E (22.63 mg/kg)
InflorescenceProtein (18.4%);
Crude fat (10.5%); TAA (18.3%), EAA (10.14%), NEAA (8.11%);
Minerals: K (24.6 mg/g DM), Ca (4.4 mg/g DM), Mg (2.3 mg/g DM), P (3.4 mg/g DM), S (4.6 mg/g DM), Fe (0.2 mg/g DM), Mn (0.3 mg/g DM), Zn (0.06 mg/g DM);
Vitamin A (<0.3 μg/100 g DM); Vitamin E (19.38 mg/kg)
StemsProtein (10.7%);
Crude fat (2.60%); TAA (10.3%), EAA (5.91%), NEAA (4.38%);
Minerals: K (13.3 mg/g DM), Ca (0.9 mg/g DM), Mg (0.9 mg/g DM), P (0.7 mg/g DM), S (0.5 mg/g DM), Fe (0.7 mg/g DM), Mn (0.02 mg/g DM), Zn (0.08 mg/g DM);
Vitamin A (<0.3 μg/100 g DM); Vitamin E (1.19 mg/kg)
RootsProtein (8.23%);
Crude fat (2.13%); TAA (8.01%), EAA (4.34%), NEAA (3.66%);
Minerals: K (11.1 mg/g DM), Ca (11.5 mg/g DM), Mg (7.1 mg/g DM), P (7.1 mg/g DM), S (3.9 mg/g DM), Fe (0.2 mg/g DM), Mn (0.2 mg/g DM), Zn (0.06 mg/g DM)
Vitamin A (<0.3 μg/100 g DM);
Vitamin E (1.36 mg/kg)
LeavesProtein (24.37 mg/100 g);
Crude fat (6.07%); TFA (4.19 mg/g FW), SFA (22.9%), UFA (77.1%), MUFA (8.4%), PUFA (68.7%)
Carbohydrates (8%);
Fibre (14.2%);
Vitamins: Tocopherol (2.74%)
AcheneLipids: SFA (29.21%), UFA (70.87%), MUFA (13.99%), PUFA (56.88%)[94]
A. arborescensLeavesLipids: TFA (3.31 mg/g FW), SFA (47.4%), UFA (52.6%), MUFA (16.3%), PUFA (36.3%)[92]
A. argyiLeavesProtein (22.0 mg/g FW); Free amino acids: EAA (3.71 mg/g DW), NEAA (2.42 mg/g DW), FAA (6.13 mg/g DW);
Total lipid (24.7 mg/g FW); SFA (40.8%), MUFA (7.1%), PUFA (52.1%);
Total carbohydrates (52.3 mg/g FW);
Dietary fiber (39.9 mg/g FW);
Minerals: K (74.22 mg/100 g FW), Ca (14.74 mg/100 g FW), Mg (36.64 mg/100 g FW), Zn (0.89 mg/100 g FW), Cu (0.13 mg/100 g FW), Mn (0.76 mg/100 g FW), Fe (3.15 mg/100 g FW);
Vitamin C (total ascorbic acid) 2.09 mg/g DW
A. austriaca Jacq.AcheneLipids: SFA (47.43%), UFA (49.02%), MUFA (9.65%), PUFA (39.37%)[94]
A. campestris L.LeavesLipids: TFA (10.22 mg/g FW), SFA (21.0%), UFA (79.0%), MUFA (3.6%), PUFA (75.3%)[92]
AerialCrude protein (115 mg/g DM)[95]
A. camphorata Vill.LeavesLipids: TFA (14.82 mg/g FW), SFA (37.4%), UFA (62.6%), MUFA (8.3%), PUFA (54.3%)[92]
A capilarisLeavesLipids: TFA (6.01 mg/g FW), SFA (16.0%), UFA (84.0%), MUFA (4.7%), PUFA (79.4%)[92]
A. frigidaAerialCrude protein (17.9%);
Minerals: K (18.34 mg/g DM), Ca (7.46 mg/g DM),P (2.54 mg/g DM), Mg (2.17 mg/g DM), Cu (1.1 mg/100 g DM), Mn (24 mg/100 g DM), Fe (20.0 mg/100 g DM) Zn (1.9 mg/100 g DM); Na (5 mg/100 g DM)
A. glacialisLeavesLipids: TFA (8.95 mg/g FW), SFA (21.6%), UFA (78.4%), MUFA (6.8%), PUFA (71.6%)[92]
A. gmellini Weber ex Stechm.LeavesLipids: TFA (14.11 mg/g FW), SFA (25.5%), UFA (74.5%), MUFA (4.5%), PUFA (70.0%)[92]
A. herba-albaAerialCrude protein (103.4–153.6 mg/g DM); Crude fibre (407.9 mg/g DM) [95,97,98]
A. jacutica DrobowLeavesLipids: SFA (61.21–68.12%), UFA (31.88–38.79%)[99]
A. ludovicianaLeavesLipids: TFA (14.28 mg/g FW), SFA (19.6%), UFA (80.4%), MUFA (5.3%), PUFA (75.1%)[92]
A. macrocephala Jaq. ex BessLeavesLipids: UFA (50.80–65.22%), SFA (34.78–49.20%).[99]
A. oleandica (Besser) KraschLeavesLipids: TFA (9.84 mg/g FW), SFA (17.6%), UFA (82.4%), MUFA (4.7%), PUFA (77.7%)[92]
A. princepsLeavesLipids: TFA (6.49 mg/g FW), SFA (20.2%), UFA (79.8%), MUFA (5.7%), PUFA (74.1%)[92]
LeavesLipids: SFA (27.5%), MUFA (35.1%), PUFA (37.4%);
Free amino acids: EAA (3.19 mg/g DW), NEAA (2.42 mg/g DW), FAA (5.61 mg/g DW);
Vitamin C (total ascorbic acid) 1.01 mg/g DW;
A. santolinifolia Turcz. ex BessLeavesLipids: SFA (51.8–65.02%), PFA (9.74–44.14%), MFA (4.06–30.85%)[100]
A. santonicum L.AcheneLipids: SFA (43.70%), UFA (56.33%), MUFA (8.26%), PUFA (48.07%)[94]
A. sieberi BesserAerialCrude protein (55 mg/g DM);
Crude fiber (484 mg/g DM);
Minerals: K (13.1 mg/g DM), Ca (15.9 mg/g DM),P (2.5 mg/g DM), Mg (1.8 mg/g DM), Cu (1.37 mg/100 g DM), Mn (2.26 mg/100 g DM), Fe (20.0 mg/100 g DM) Zn (21.2 mg/100 g DM)
A. sieversiana Ehrh. ex WilldLeavesLipids: UFA (64.11–73.23%), SFA (26.77–35.89%)[99]
A. sphaerocephalaSeedCarbohydrate (73%) [102]
A. stelleriana BessLeavesLipids: TFA (17.78 mg/g FW), SFA (70.2%), UFA (29.8%), MUFA (1.3%), PUFA (28.4%)[92]
A. tridentata subsp. wyomingensis Beetle & A.L.YoungLeavesCrude protein (15.7%)[103]
A. vallesiacaLeavesLipids: TFA (5.27 mg/g FW), SFA (17.1%), UFA (82.9%), MUFA (9.3%), PUFA (73.6%)[92]
A. vulgarisLeavesLipids: TFA (13.32 mg/g FW), SFA (15.2%), UFA (84.8%), MUFA (3.7%), PUFA (81.1%)[92]
* Free (FAA), essential (EAA) and non-essential (NEAA) amino acids; total (TFA), saturated (SFA), unsaturated (UFA), monounsaturated (MUFA) and polyunsaturated (PUFA) fatty acids; DW—dry weight; FW—fresh weight; DM—dry matter. ** Oil cake remaining after the extraction of essential oil.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Trendafilova, A.; Moujir, L.M.; Sousa, P.M.C.; Seca, A.M.L. Research Advances on Health Effects of Edible Artemisia Species and Some Sesquiterpene Lactones Constituents. Foods 2021, 10, 65.

AMA Style

Trendafilova A, Moujir LM, Sousa PMC, Seca AML. Research Advances on Health Effects of Edible Artemisia Species and Some Sesquiterpene Lactones Constituents. Foods. 2021; 10(1):65.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Trendafilova, Antoaneta, Laila M. Moujir, Pedro M. C. Sousa, and Ana M. L. Seca. 2021. "Research Advances on Health Effects of Edible Artemisia Species and Some Sesquiterpene Lactones Constituents" Foods 10, no. 1: 65.

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop