Next Article in Journal
“Scientific Writing for Impact Is a Learned Skill—It Can Be Enhanced with Training”: An Interview with Patrick O’Connor
Next Article in Special Issue
Labours of Love and Convenience: Dealing with Community-Supported Knowledge in Museums
Previous Article in Journal
Who Is (Likely) Peer-Reviewing Your Papers? A Partial Insight into the World’s Top Reviewers
Case Report

The Ecosystem of Repository Migration

Herman B Wells Library W501, 1320 East Tenth Street, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Publications 2019, 7(1), 16;
Received: 19 December 2018 / Revised: 21 February 2019 / Accepted: 1 March 2019 / Published: 5 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selected Papers from Open Repositories 2018)
Indiana University was an early adopter of the Fedora repository, developing it as a home for heterogeneous digital library content from a variety of collections with unique content models. After joining the Hydra Project, now known as Samvera, in 2012, development progressed on a variety of applications that formed the foundation for digital library services using the Fedora 4 repository. These experiences have shaped migration planning to move from Fedora 3 to Fedora 4 for this large and inclusive set of digital content. Moving to Fedora 4 is not just a repository change; it is an ecosystem shift. End user interfaces for access, management systems for collection managers, and data structures are all impacted. This article shares what Indiana University has learned about migrating to Fedora 4 to help others work through their own migration considerations. This article is also meant to inspire the Fedora repository development community to offer ways to further ease migration work, sustaining Fedora users moving forward, and inviting new Fedora users to try the software and become involved in the community. View Full-Text
Keywords: Fedora/Samvera migration; project planning; service management; digital library services Fedora/Samvera migration; project planning; service management; digital library services
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Hardesty, J.L.; Homenda, N. The Ecosystem of Repository Migration. Publications 2019, 7, 16.

AMA Style

Hardesty JL, Homenda N. The Ecosystem of Repository Migration. Publications. 2019; 7(1):16.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hardesty, Juliet L., and Nicholas Homenda. 2019. "The Ecosystem of Repository Migration" Publications 7, no. 1: 16.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop