Next Article in Journal
Tooth Agenesis Patterns in Orofacial Clefting Using Tooth Agenesis Code: A Meta-Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Broadening the Dental Hygiene Students’ Perspectives on the Oral Health Professionals: A Text Mining Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Prevalence and Risk of Dental Erosion in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessment of Knowledge towards Radiation Protection Measures among Newly Graduated Dentists from Egypt and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A Questionnaire-Based Cross-Sectional Study
 
 
Article

Current Undergraduate Dental Implantology Teaching in UK

1
School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford M5 4WT, UK
2
ICE Postgraduate Dental Institute and Hospital, 24 Furness Quay, Salford M50 3XZ, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Jelena Dumancic and Božana Lončar Brzak
Dent. J. 2022, 10(7), 127; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10070127
Received: 27 April 2022 / Revised: 13 June 2022 / Accepted: 14 June 2022 / Published: 5 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Dental Education)
Dental Implants are a popular treatment option for tooth replacement, with documented long-term success and survival rates of more than 95% over a period of 10 years. However, incorporating dental implantology into an undergraduate dental curriculum has issues associated. Therefore, the aim of this research was to examine and evaluate current undergraduate dental implantology education in the UK, investigate the amount of time allocated to this subject and analyse the barriers that are currently impeding the development of the programmes. An online questionnaire hosted by Online Surveys was designed, piloted, and sent to 16 dental schools providing undergraduate education in the UK. Ethical approval was gained from The University of Salford to conduct the study. Out of the 16 dental schools contacted, eight questionnaire responses were received, hence a response rate of 50% was achieved. The hours dedicated to the implant teaching programme varied from 3 h to 25 h, with a mean average of 11 h. It was identified from the results that no teaching of dental implantology was conducted in year 2; 12% of the schools responded that the subject was taught in year 1, 37% in year 3, 75% in year 4 and 50% in year 5. The methods used to deliver the programme were mainly lecture-based teaching, with only one dental school allowing students to place implants on patients. The main barriers to progression of the programme were financial (75%), followed by time limitations imposed by the curriculum (37%) and liability insurance (37%). However, there appears to be a consensus that further training beyond bachelor’s degree level is required to teach implantology effectively. View Full-Text
Keywords: dental implants; dental undergraduate; education; curriculum; barriers dental implants; dental undergraduate; education; curriculum; barriers
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Hare, A.; Bird, S.; Wright, S.; Ucer, C.; Khan, R.S. Current Undergraduate Dental Implantology Teaching in UK. Dent. J. 2022, 10, 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10070127

AMA Style

Hare A, Bird S, Wright S, Ucer C, Khan RS. Current Undergraduate Dental Implantology Teaching in UK. Dentistry Journal. 2022; 10(7):127. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10070127

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hare, Arminder, Samantha Bird, Simon Wright, Cemal Ucer, and Rabia Sannam Khan. 2022. "Current Undergraduate Dental Implantology Teaching in UK" Dentistry Journal 10, no. 7: 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10070127

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop