Next Article in Journal
Mg-Doped O3-Na[Ni0.6Fe0.25Mn0.15]O2 Cathode for Long-Cycle-Life Na-Ion Batteries
Previous Article in Journal
An Insight into the Disease Prognostic Potentials of Nanosensors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Significant Enhancement of Strength and Ductility in Bioresorbable Zn–0.1Mg Alloy via ECAP Processing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Functional Inorganic Biomaterials for Molecular Sensing and Biomedical Applications

by
Nabanita Saikia
Department of Chemistry, New Mexico Highlands University, Las Vegas, NM 87701, USA
Inorganics 2025, 13(8), 260; https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics13080260
Submission received: 18 July 2025 / Revised: 26 July 2025 / Accepted: 28 July 2025 / Published: 4 August 2025
Inorganic biomaterials comprise a broad array of materials that include metals, polymers, ceramics, and composites [1,2,3,4,5,6], and play a pivotal role across disciplines such as chemistry, materials science, biology, medicine [7], and biomedical engineering [8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. The development of inorganic biomaterials with tunable intrinsic properties [15,16] and functionality has positioned them at the forefront of applications from biosensing and imaging [17,18] to therapy [19,20] regenerative medicine, and wound healing [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. The field of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine can vastly benefit from advancements in nanoscience and technology [29,30,31,32], particularly in the fabrication and application of inorganic-based nanoparticles and bioactive materials [1,33,34,35]. Techniques like small-angle X-rays and neutron scattering and light scattering have enabled the structural characterization (size, shape and morphological transitions) of nanostructured biomaterials in the sub-millisecond time scale [36]. Coupled with traditional characterization techniques, scattering methods can facilitate their design and application in advanced bio-nanotechnological fields and disease therapy [36,37]. Mitić et al. [38] reviewed recent developments in the application of instrumental techniques for structural and physicochemical characterization of biomaterials and bone tissue. The same study discussed the application of instrumental techniques, namely, X-ray, IR and Raman vibrational spectroscopy, NMR, ESR, mass spectrometry, atomic absorption spectrometry, inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry, thermogravimetric analysis, differential thermal analysis, SEM, and high-resolution TEM, for structural and morphological characterization, and predicting the reactivity, thermodynamic stability, crystalline behavior, and phase transformations of biomaterials.
The Special Issue combines original research and critical reviews that showcase the versatility of inorganic biomaterials and nanoparticles in molecular sensing, targeted therapy [39,40], drug delivery [24], and regenerative medicine [41] utilizing current state-of-the-art techniques [41,42]. The synergy between experiment and computation that is evident throughout the collection highlights the integrative approaches essential in developing next-generation biomaterials.
The study by Cuperová et al. [43] investigated the effect of severe plastic deformation on the microstructure and mechanical properties of an as-cast Zn–0.1 wt.% Mg alloy using the Equal Channel Angular Pressing (ECAP) technique. Zn-based alloys showed strong potential as bioactive materials for intracorporeal implants due to their lower cytotoxicity, reduced inflammatory responses compared to pure Zn, and improved biocompatibility and optimal degradation rate in physiological environments. This study underscored ECAP’s effectiveness in simultaneously enhancing strength and ductility in Zn-based alloys, thereby advancing their potential applications as orthopedic implant materials.
The synthesis of a novel silver(I) complex, [Ag(HL1)2]NO3 (AgHL1), with a coumarin derivative, (3E)-3-(1-{[(pyridin-2-yl)methyl]amino} ethylidene)-3,4-dihydro-2H-benzopyran-2,4-dione (HL1) was reported Kurjan et al. [44] to study their anticancer and antimicrobial activity. The HL1 ligand exhibited moderate activity, while AgHL1 displayed a pronounced, time- and dose-dependent inhibitory effect on the metabolic activities of both cancerous cell lines. The flexural strength, color change and antimicrobial effect of silver–zeolite NPs in acrylic resin materials was reported by Yaman et al. [45] using three different rates of NPs (0%, 2%, 4%, 5%). Discs with 2% silver–zeolite NPs showed a significant antimicrobial effect and were more effective against C. albicans than those with rates of 4% and 5%. While adding silver–zeolite NPs provided antimicrobial properties, it reduced the material’s structural integrity and altered its esthetic appearance, highlighting the necessity of balancing antimicrobial efficacy with mechanical and esthetic properties in dental materials.
Marabello et al. [46], employed a computational method to investigate three new solid salicylatoborate compounds, [Ca(H2O)6](C14H8O6B)2 (CaSB), [Cu(C14H8O6B)] (CuSB), and [Li(C14H8O6B)(H2O)] (LiSB), as potential boron and/or lithium delivery agents for the development of 10B-enriched NPs in neutron capture therapy (NCT). LiSB exhibited the highest dose absorbed by the tumor mass and resulted in being the most efficient compound. Thus, to design more efficient compounds for NCT, the density of 10B should be enhanced rather than that of 6Li.
Doxorubicin (DOX)-loaded Ca-Mg-doped mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) were developed by Zhang et al. [47] as tumor-targeted drug delivery systems for breast cancer. The incorporation of calcium and magnesium demonstrated an increase in the degradation rate under acidic conditions and an accelerated release, which reduced the toxicity of DOX and promoted cellular uptake. Molecular dynamic simulation was used to study the intermolecular interactions and physicochemical properties of novel mesoporous silica. Doping with calcium and magnesium led to an increase in the free energy of the system; the free energy of the Ca2Mg2@MSNs group was the largest, which indicated that the stability of the MSN system decreased after being doped with calcium and magnesium. Hemolysis experiments verified that MSNs could be used as a carrier for medical purposes. Liu et al. [48] synthesized multifunctional Ca2+ doped mesoporous silica nanoparticles (CMSNs) using the sol–gel method. DOX was loaded into the as-prepared CMSNs (CMSNs@Dox). The doping of Ca2+ endowed the MSNs with the ability to carry out excellent specific degradation and pH-responsive drug release, and enabled the synergy of chemotherapy and calcicoptosis. This newly prepared Ca2+-doped nanoplatform provided a practical and feasible strategy for improving the efficacy of chemotherapy.
Barnash et al. [49] studied the effect of CoFe2O4 NPs on the properties of an electro-optical liquid crystal (LC) cell based on the nematic composition of 4-Cyano-4′-pentylbiphenyl (5CB). At the input signal, with a frequency of 500 kHz, a resonant current increase was obtained in the electrical circuit, followed by a decrease in the current with an increase in the frequency. An increase in the resonant current caused a decrease in LC cell impedance. This indicated the formation of a consistent oscillatory circuit. Giacomet et al. [50] developed a simple and cheap electrochemical method for diagnosing antibodies against SARS-Cov-2. Disposable screen-printed carbon electrodes (SPEs) covered with gold microblobs (AuMBs) were synthesized. The SPE-AuMBs were coated with cysteamine, which allowed the N-hydroxysuccinimide-activated SARS-CoV-2 antigen to be immobilized. The antigen-activated SPE could qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The antibody analysis took around 15 min and was cheaper than traditional rapid tests.
Ntoupis et al. [51] measured the luminescence efficiency of a cerium fluoride (CeF3) inorganic scintillator in crystal form as a possible alternative to high-luminescence but hygroscopic cerium bromide (CeBr3). The obtained luminescence efficiency results showed that CeF3 was not suitable for medical imaging applications covering the range of 50–140 kVp; however, an examination of its luminescence output in the nuclear medicine energy range (~70 to 511 keV) could reveal possible applicability in these modalities. Lastly, Saikia [33] reviewed the emerging applications of inorganic-based NPs and biomaterials in stem cell regenerative research, tissue engineering, artificial skin and cartilage regeneration, neural nerve injuries, 3D bioprinting, and the development of novel bio-scaffolds. The review also addressed critical challenges in the clinical application of inorganic biomaterials in regenerative medicine such as their biocompatibility and bioaccumulation, toxicity, assessment tools, optimization of mechanical properties, and their long-term fate.
The contributions in the Special Issue range from advanced molecular sensing to innovative therapeutic strategies for the treatment of diseases, and bridge the interfaces between chemistry, biology, engineering, and medicine. My hope is that this Special Issue collection, Functional Inorganic Biomaterials for Molecular Sensing and Biomedical Applications, will not only stimulate ongoing research advancements in the field but also inspire interdisciplinary collaborative efforts aimed at translating fundamental research into real-world applications. I take this opportunity to invite researchers to contribute to the second volume of the Special Issue, Functional Inorganic Biomaterials for Molecular Sensing and Biomedical Applications, 2nd Edition, that will continue to focus on recent advances in inorganic biomaterials and nanoparticles. The forthcoming volume includes all stages of the process, from rational design and structural characterization to applications in molecular sensing, clinical diagnosis, drug delivery, and medicine.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, H.; Zhao, Z.; Wu, C. Bioactive Inorganic Materials for Innervated Multi-Tissue Regeneration. Adv. Sci. 2025, 12, e2415344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sharma, A.; Kokil, G.R.; He, Y.; Lowe, B.; Salam, A.; Altalhi, T.A.; Ye, Q.; Kumeria, T. Inorganic/Organic Combination: Inorganic Particles/Polymer Composites for Tissue Engineering Applications. Bioact. Mater. 2023, 24, 535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Brokesh, A.M.; Gaharwar, A.K. Inorganic Biomaterials for Regenerative Medicine. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 5319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. dos Santos, V.I.; Chevalier, J.; Fredel, M.C.; Henriques, B.; Gremillard, L. Ceramics and Ceramic Composites for Biomedical Engineering Applications via Direct Ink Writing: Overall Scenario, Advances in the Improvement of Mechanical and Biological Properties and Innovations. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2024, 161, 100841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Vaiani, L.; Boccaccio, A.; Uva, A.E.; Palumbo, G.; Piccininni, A.; Guglielmi, P.; Cantore, S.; Santacroce, L.; Charitos, I.A.; Ballini, A. Ceramic Materials for Biomedical Applications: An Overview on Properties and Fabrication Processes. J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Khan, T.; Vadivel, G.; Ramasamy, B.; Murugesan, G.; Sebaey, T.A. Biodegradable Conducting Polymer-Based Composites for Biomedical Applications—A Review. Polymers 2024, 16, 1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lee, H.P.; Gaharwar, A.K. Light-Responsive Inorganic Biomaterials for Biomedical Applications. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 2000863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Huebsch, N.; Mooney, D.J. Inspiration and Application in the Evolution of Biomaterials. Nature 2009, 462, 426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Huang, H.; Feng, W.; Chen, Y. Two-dimensional Biomaterials: Material Science, Biological Effect and Biomedical Engineering Applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 11381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bhat, S.; Kumar, A. Biomaterials and Bioengineering Tomorrow’s Healthcare. Biomatter 2013, 3, e24717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Guo, Z.; Liu, Z.; Tang, R. Applications of Amorphous Inorganics as Novel Functional Materials. Mater. Chem. Front. 2024, 8, 1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mao, W.; Yoo, H.S. Inorganic Nanoparticle Functionalization Strategies in Immunotherapeutic Applications. Biomater. Res. 2024, 28, 0086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, J.; Zeng, H.; Zeng, Z.; Zeng, Y.; Xie, T. Promising Graphene-Based Nanomaterials and Their Biomedical Applications and Potential Risks: A Comprehensive Review. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 7, 5363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Huang, Y.; Guo, X.; Wu, Y.; Chen, X.; Feng, L.; Xie, N.; Shen, G. Nanotechnology’s Frontier in Combatting Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases: Prevention and Treatment. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2024, 9, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, F.; Yao, S.; Li, J.; Huang, K.; Zhang, D.; Wong, T.M.; Tang, R.; Yeung, K.W.K.; Wu, J. Inorganic-organic Hybrid Metamaterials with Switchable High Stiffness and Elasticity. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 4423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zimina, T.M.; Sitkov, N.O.; Gareev, K.G.; Fedorov, V.; Grouzdev, D.; Koziaeva, V.; Gao, H.; Combs, S.E.; Shevtsov, M. Biosensors and Drug Delivery in Oncotheranostics Using Inorganic Synthetic and Biogenic Magnetic Nanoparticles. Biosensors 2022, 12, 789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Trucillo, P. Biomaterials for Drug Delivery and Human Applications. Materials 2024, 17, 456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Fu, Y.; Liu, T.; Wang, H.; Wang, Z.; Hou, L.; Jiang, J.; Xu, T. Applications of Nanomaterial Technology in Biosensing. J. Sci. Adv. Mater. Devices 2024, 9, 100694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shi, S.; Vissapragada, R.; Abi Jaoude, J.; Huang, C.; Mittal, A.; Liu, E.; Zhong, J.; Kumar, V. Evolving Role of Biomaterials in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiation Oncology. Bioact. Mater. 2020, 5, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, D.; Peng, Y.; Li, Y.; Kpegah, J.K.S.K.; Chen, S. Multifunctional Inorganic Biomaterials: New Weapons Targeting Osteosarcoma. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2023, 9, 1105540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kharbikar, B.N.; Mohindra, P.; Desai, T.A. Biomaterials to Enhance Stem Cell Transplantation. Cell Stem Cell 2022, 29, 692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nikolova, M.P.; Chavali, M.S. Recent Advances in Biomaterials for 3D Scaffolds: A Review. Bioact. Mater. 2019, 4, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Richbourg, N.R.; Peppas, N.A.; Sikavitsas, V.I. Tuning the Biomimetic Behavior of Scaffolds for Regenerative Medicine Through Surface Modifications. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2019, 13, 1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sahoo, R.N.; Rout, S.; Parmanik, A.; Satapathy, B.S.; Pattnaik, S.; Maharana, L.; Nayak, A.K. Inorganic Biomaterials for Ocular Drug Delivery: A Comprehensive Review. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2025, 106, 106667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Murali, A.; Brokesh, A.M.; Cross, L.M.; Kersey, A.L.; Jaiswal, M.K.; Singh, I.; Gaharwar, A. Inorganic Biomaterials Shape the Transcriptome Profile to Induce Endochondral Differentiation. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, e2402468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zheng, Y.; Wu, J.; Zhu, Y.; Wu, C. Inorganic-based Biomaterials for Rapid Hemostasis and Wound Healing. Chem. Sci. 2022, 14, 29–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ferraro, A. Biomaterials and Therapeutic Applications. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 108, 012021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dai, T.; He, W.; Yao, C.; Ma, X.; Ren, W.; Mai, Y.; Wu, A. Applications of Inorganic Nanoparticles in the Diagnosis and Therapy of Atherosclerosis. Biomater. Sci. 2020, 8, 3784–3799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Chen, F.M.; Liu, X. Advancing Biomaterials of Human Origin for Tissue Engineering. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2016, 53, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kim, H.-S.; Baby, T.; Lee, J.-H.; Shin, U.S.; Kim, H.-W. Biomaterials-Enabled Electrical Stimulation for Tissue Healing and Regeneration. Med-X 2024, 2, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Alshangiti, D.M.; El-Damhougy, T.K.; Zaher, A.; Madani, M.; Mohamady Ghobashy, M. Revolutionizing Biomedicine: Advancements, Applications, and Prospects of Nanocomposite Macromolecular Carbohydrate-based Hydrogel Biomaterials: A Review. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 35251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shi, J.; Votruba, A.R.; Farokhzad, O.C.; Langer, R.; Gaharwar, A.K. Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery and Tissue Engineering: From Discovery to Applications. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 3223–3230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Saikia, N. Inorganic-Based Nanoparticles and Biomaterials as Biocompatible Scaffolds for Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering: Current Advances and Trends of Development. Inorganics 2024, 12, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ma, J.; Wu, C. Bioactive Inorganic Particles-based Biomaterials for Skin Tissue Engineering. Exploration 2022, 2, 20210083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Song, P.; Zhou, D.; Wang, F.; Li, G.; Bai, L.; Su, J. Programmable Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration. Mater. Today Bio. 2024, 29, 101296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lombardo, D.; Calandra, P.; Kiselev, M.A. Structural Characterization of Biomaterials by Means of Small Angle X-rays and Neutron Scattering (SAXS and SANS), and Light Scattering Experiments. Molecules 2020, 25, 5624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Carvalho, P.M.; Felício, M.R.; Santos, N.C.; Gonçalves, S.; Domingues, M.M. Application of Light Scattering Techniques to Nanoparticle Characterization and Development. Front. Chem. 2018, 6, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Mitić, Ž.; Stolić, A.; Stojanović, S.; Najman, S.; Ignjatović, N.; Nikolić, G.; Trajanović, M. Instrumental Methods and Techniques for Structural and Physicochemical Characterization of Biomaterials and Bone Tissue: A Review. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 79, 930–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Han, X.; Alu, A.; Liu, H.; Shi, Y.; Wei, X.; Cai, L.; Wei, Y. Biomaterial-assisted Biotherapy: A Brief Review of Biomaterials Used in Drug Delivery, Vaccine Development, Gene Therapy, and Stem Cell Therapy. Bioact. Mater. 2022, 17, 29–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Aly, R.M. Current State of Stem Cell-based Therapies: An Overview. Stem Cell Investig. 2020, 7, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jarrige, M.; Frank, E.; Herardot, E.; Martineau, S.; Darle, A.; Benabides, M.; Domingues, S.; Chose, O.; Habeler, W.; Lorant, J.; et al. The Future of Regenerative Medicine: Cell Therapy Using Pluripotent Stem Cells and Acellular Therapies Based on Extracellular Vesicles. Cells 2021, 10, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lele, M.; Kapur, S.; Hargett, S.; Sureshbabu, N.M.; Gaharwar, A.K. Global Trends in Clinical Trials Involving Engineered Biomaterials. Sci. Adv. 2024, 10, eabq0997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cuperová, I.; Fujda, M.; Kočiško, R.; Petroušek, P.; Molčanová, Z.; Matvija, M.; Džunda, R.; Ballóková, B.; Csík, D.; Gáborová, K.; et al. Significant Enhancement of Strength and Ductility in Bioresorbable Zn–0.1Mg Alloy via ECAP Processing. Inorganics 2025, 13, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kurjan, J.; Jendželovsk, Z.; Dečmanov., V.; Vilkov, M.; Ćirković, K.; Radojević, I.; Liteck, M.; Jendželovský, R.; Potočň.k, I. The Coumarin-Based Silver(I) Complex Showed Enhanced Antitumor and Antimicrobial Activity than Ligand Itself. Inorganics 2025, 13, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yaman, K.; Demir, N.; Arslan, U.; Çiftçi, N. Antimicrobial, Optical, and Mechanical Properties of Saliva-Contaminated Silver–Zeolite Nanoparticle-Incorporated Dental Acrylic Resins. Inorganics 2024, 12, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Marabello, D.; Benzi, P.; Canepa, C.; Cioci, A. Ca-, Li-, and Cu-Salicylatoborates for Potential Applications in Neutron Capture Therapy: A Computational Method for the Preliminary Discrimination of the More Promising Compounds. Inorganics 2025, 13, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, Q.; Huang, J.; Liu, C.; Chen, R.; Jiang, T.; Hailili, Y.; Bahetibieke, T.; Tang, X.; Wang, M. Preparation of Ca-Mg Double-Doped Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles and Their Drug- Loading and Drug-Releasing Properties. Inorganics 2025, 13, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, C.; Tang, X.; Huang, G. Biodegradable Ca2+ Doped Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Promote Chemotherapy Synergism with Calcicoptosis and Activate Anti-Tumor Immunity. Inorganics 2024, 12, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Barnash, Y.; Jovanović, S.; Jovanović, Z.; Kamanina, N. Electrical Features of Liquid Crystal Composition Doped with Cobalt Ferrite: Possible Sensing Applications. Inorganics 2025, 13, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Giacomet, M.M.; Buzzetti, P.H.M.; Junior, O.O.S.; Martins, A.F.; Bonafe, E.G.; Monteiro, J.P. Portable Electrochemical Immunosensor Based on a Gold Microblobs-Optimized Screen- Printed Electrode for SARS-CoV-2 Diagnosis. Inorganics 2024, 12, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ntoupis, V.; Michail, C.; Kalyvas, N.; Bakas, A.; Kandarakis, I.; Fountos, G.; Valais, I. Luminescence Efficiency and Spectral Compatibility of Cerium Fluoride (CeF3) Inorganic Scintillator with Various Optical Sensors in the Diagnostic Radiology X-ray Energy Range. Inorganics 2024, 12, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Saikia, N. Functional Inorganic Biomaterials for Molecular Sensing and Biomedical Applications. Inorganics 2025, 13, 260. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics13080260

AMA Style

Saikia N. Functional Inorganic Biomaterials for Molecular Sensing and Biomedical Applications. Inorganics. 2025; 13(8):260. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics13080260

Chicago/Turabian Style

Saikia, Nabanita. 2025. "Functional Inorganic Biomaterials for Molecular Sensing and Biomedical Applications" Inorganics 13, no. 8: 260. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics13080260

APA Style

Saikia, N. (2025). Functional Inorganic Biomaterials for Molecular Sensing and Biomedical Applications. Inorganics, 13(8), 260. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics13080260

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop