Next Article in Journal
Boron Applications in Prevention, Diagnosis and Therapy for High Global Burden Diseases
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis of Nanostructured Alumina from Byproduct Aluminum Filings: Production and Characterization
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis, X-ray Structure, and Hirshfeld Analysis of [Ag(3-amino-5,6-dimethyl-1,2,4-triazine)(NO3)]n: A Potent Anticancer and Antimicrobial Agent
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Inorganics
Volume 11
Issue 9
10.3390/inorganics11090356
inorganics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The “Periodic Table” of 1-methylbenzotriazole: Zinc(II) Complexes

by
Christina Stamou
1,
Eleftheria Barouni
1,
John C. Plakatouras
2,
Michael M. Sigalas
3,
Catherine P. Raptopoulou
4,
Vassilis Psycharis
4,*,
Evangelos G. Bakalbassis
5,* and
Spyros P. Perlepes
1,6,*
1
Department of Chemistry, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
2
Department of Chemistry, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
3
Department of Materials Science, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
4
Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, NCSR “Demokritos”, 15310 Aghia Paraskevi Attikis, Greece
5
Department of Chemistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, University Campus, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
6
Institute of Chemical Engineering Sciences, Foundation for Research and Technology (FORTH/ICE-HT), Platani, P.O. Box 1414, 26504 Patras, Greece
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Inorganics 2023, 11(9), 356; https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11090356
Submission received: 4 August 2023 / Revised: 27 August 2023 / Accepted: 28 August 2023 / Published: 29 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Advances in Coordination and Bioinorganic Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In an attempt to fill in the empty Zn position in the “Periodic Table” of 1-methylbenzotriazole (Mebta), reactions between Zn(II) sources and this ligand were carried out. The detailed synthetic studies provided access to complexes [ZnX2(Mebta)2] (X = Cl, 1; X = Br, 3; X = I, 4), (MebtaH)2[ZnCl4] (2), tet-[Zn(NO3)2(Mebta)2] (5), oct-[Zn(NO3)2(Mebta)2] (6), and [Zn(Mebta)4](Y)2 [Y = ClO4, 7; Y = PF6, 8]. Solid-state thermal decomposition of 2 leads to 1 in quantitative yield. The structures of 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 were determined by single-crystal crystallography. The structures of the remaining complexes were proposed based on spectroscopic evidence. In all compounds, Mebta behaves as monodentate ligand using the nitrogen of the position 3 as donor. Complexes 1–4, 7, and 8 are tetrahedral. Complexes 5 and 6 are isostoichiometric and their preparation in pure forms depends on the reaction conditions; in the former the ZnII atom has a tetrahedral geometry, whereas in the latter the metal ion is octahedral. This case of rare isomerism arises from the monodentate (in 5) vs. bidentate (in 6) coordination of the nitrato groups. Extensive π–π stacking interactions and non-classical H bonds build interesting 3D architectures in the structurally characterized complexes. The compounds were characterized by IR, far-IR, and Raman spectroscopies in the solid state, and the data were interpreted in terms of the structures (known or proposed) of the complexes and the coordination modes of the organic and inorganic ligands involved. The solid-state structures of the complexes are not retained in solution, as proven by NMR (1H, 13C[1H]) spectroscopy and molar conductivity data. The thermal decomposition study of 1 and 3 leads to stable intermediates with 1:1 stoichiometry, i.e., ZnX2(Mebta). Based on far-IR spectra, polymeric tetrahedral structures are possible with simultaneous presence of terminal and bridging X− groups. Liquid-phase ab initio (MP2) and gas-phase DFT calculations, performed on Mebta and the nitrato complexes, respectively, shed light on the tendency of Mebta for N3-coordination, and the existence and relative stabilities of 5 and 6.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Azoles, e.g., pyrazoles and imidazoles, have written their own history in classical coordination chemistry in the last five decades [1]. A popular family of this class of ligands are benzotriazoles (Figure 1; R, R’ = H or various non-donor and/or donor groups). Their basic skeleton consists of two fused five-(1,2,3-triazole) and six-(benzene) rings [2,3]. In the parent molecule (BtaH; R, R’ =H), the benzenoid form is more stable (by ~9 kcal mol−1) than the quinonoid form, and thus most derivatives of BtaH appear as the N(1)-isomers [4]. The molecule is simultaneously a weak acid (pKa = 8.2) and a weak base [5].
Benzotriazoles are central “players” in organic [2,3,6], medicinal [7,8], environmental [9], physical and theoretical [4,10,11,12,13,14], and materials [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22] chemistry from both the basic research and applications viewpoints. For example, in materials chemistry: (a) polar benzotriazoles (including BtaH) are used as corrosion inhibitors for metals (especially Cu) and their alloys, in antifreeze liquids, household detergents, aircraft de-icing fluids, and in the treatment of artifacts of historical and archaeological importance [15,16,17]; (b) BtaH and its amino-, azido-, and nitro-derivatives are being tested as energetic materials [18,19,20]; (c) orthohydroxyphenyl benzotriazoles find extensive use as UV absorbers (stabilizers) in plastic materials, personal care products, and biosolids [21,22]; and (d) benzotriazole-decorated grapheme oxide is a very efficient material for removal of the uranyl ion from nuclear waste water [23].
Benzotriazole- and benzotriazolate-based ligands are also important in inorganic chemistry [24,25]. They have been used by several groups and our group in the synthesis of—amongst others—coordination clusters and cyclic cages [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35], and coordination polymers [36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48], often with interesting magnetic, optical, and catalytic properties.
1-methylbenzotriazole (Mebta, Figure 1) is the archetype of simple N-substituted benzotriazoles. It is almost white and harmful to the respiratory system. Moreover, it is dangerous if ingested and causes irritation upon contact with eyes and skin. Recently, we performed a detailed study of the vibrational, electronic, and NMR spectra of Mebta, combined with Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations employing various functional and basis sets [49]. The coordination chemistry of Mebta has been intensely studied by our group [50,51,52,53], and sporadically by other research teams [54,55]. A common characteristic in all studies is the monodentate ligation of Mebta through the N atom of position 3 (see Figure 1) of the azole ring. This exclusively monodentate coordination has been related to the inability of Mebta to act as corrosion inhibitor; for such a property, deprotonation and bridging behavior of the molecule is required [14,16,17]. Over the past three decades, we have been making an effort to build a “periodic table” of Mebta, studying its reactions with as many metal and metalloid ions as possible; one of our concerns is to study the possibility of N2, N3-bridging behavior for Mebta (such effort are unsuccessful so far). Regarding the first goal, we are now glad to fill the blank space of Zn(II) in this “periodic table” by describing the syntheses, structures, and spectroscopic characterization of the first Zn(II) complexes; we also support our experimental data by theoretical calculations, with emphasis on the investigation of the inability of Mebta to behave as a bidentate bridging ligand.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthetic Comments

For reasons outlined in “Introduction”, we sought the preparation of Zn(II)/Mebta complexes. We started our efforts with zinc(II) halides. The 1:2 reactions between ZnX2 and Mebta in EtOH gave complexes [ZnX2(Mebta)2] (X = Cl, 1; X = Br, 3; X = I, 4) in low to moderate yields, Equation (1). Changes of the molar ratio from 1:2 to 1:1 or 1:4 and the solvent from EtOH to MeCN led again to the isolation of 1–3 (analytical, IR, and Raman data); thus, no compounds of the empirical formulae ZnX2(Mebta) or ZnX2(Mebta)4 could be isolated, suggesting that the 1:2 complexes are the thermodynamically favored species under the conditions employed.
ZnX 2 + 2 Mebta → E t O H [ ZnX 2 ( Mebta ) 2 ]                                                                         1 ,   3 ,   4
Trying to prepare salts with protonated Mebta, i.e., MebtaH+, we performed the 1:2 reaction between ZnCl2 and Mebta in hydrochloric acid; slow evaporation of gaseous HCl from the reaction solution resulted in bis(1-methylbenzotriazolium)tetrachlorozincate, (MebtaH)2[ZnCl4] (2), in yields depending on the final concentration of the system, Equation (2). Thermal decomposition of solid 2 at 205 °C under N2 gave 1 in a quantitative yield, Equation (3).
ZnCl 2   + 2 Mebta + 2 HCl   → H C l / H 2 O ( MebtaH ) 2 [ ZnCl 4 ]                                                                                                             2
                                      ( MebtaH ) 2 [ ZnCl 4 ]   → N 2 / 205 ° C [ ZnCl 2 ( Mebta ) 2 ] + 2 HCl   ↑ 2                                                                                                 1
Continuing our efforts, we used Zn(NO3)2∙4H2O as starting material. The possibility of bidentate (either chelating or bridging) behavior of NO3− might give different chemistry compared with that of zinc(II) halides. Somewhat to our surprise, we isolated two mononuclear nitrato complexes with the same stoichiometry, but with different stereochemistry at the metal ion resulting from the different coordination mode of the nitrato ligands (monodentate vs. bidentate). The 1:2 reaction of Zn(NO3)2∙4H2O and Mebta in EtOH at room temperature led to the precipitation of tet-[Zn(NO3)2(Mebta)2] (5; the abbreviation “tet” denotes the tetrahedral geometry of ZnII), Equation (4). The analogous reaction at 55 °C in the presence of excess of triethylorthoformate (TEOF) gave complex oct-[Zn(NO3)2(Mebta)2] (6; “oct” denotes the octahedral geometry of ZnII), Equation (5). The preparative procedures are perfectly reproducible. These experimental observations indicate that the concentration of H2O in the reaction mixture affects the product identity. It is well known that TEOF is an efficient dehydrating agent in coordination chemistry (this capacity increases with increasing temperature) [55], Equation (6). It is hypothesized (no experimental evidence) that in the presence of H2O contained in EtOH, the octahedral species [Zn(NO3)2(Mebta)2(H2O)2] (with monodentate nitrates) is formed in solution, and the aqua ligands are removed during crystallization retaining the monodentate character of NO3− and leading to 5. When H2O is less (or practically absent) in the reaction mixture, the octahedral species [Zn(NO3)2(Mebta)2] (with bidentate nitrates) is formed in solution and this is precipitated, resulting in 6. In both cases, it is assumed that EtOH can not compete with H2O or NO3− for participation in the coordination sphere of ZnII. Complexes 5 and 6 were also isolated using a 1:4 Zn(NO3)2∙4H2O/Mebta reaction ratio.
Zn ( NO 3 ) 2 · 4 H 2 O + 2 Mebta   → 20 ° C / E t O H tet - [ Zn ( NO 3 ) 2 ( Mebta ) 2 ] + 4 H 2 O
                              5
Zn ( NO 3 ) 2 · 4 H 2 O + 2 Mebta + 4 HC ( O C 2 H 5 ) 3   → 55 ° C / E t O H oct - [ Zn ( NO 3 ) 2 ( Mebta ) 2 ] + 4 HCO ( O C 2 H 5 ) 3 + 8 C 2 H 5 OH
                                     6
HC ( O C 2 H 5 ) 3 + H 2 O   → T HCO ( O C 2 H 5 ) + 2 C 2 H 5 OH
Our next step was to investigate if salts containing the [Zn(Mebta)4]2+ ion, i.e., cationic complexes, could be capable of existence. For this reason, we used Zn(ClO4)2∙6H2O as starting material because ClO4− shows little tendency to coordinate to metal ions. From the 1:4 Zn(ClO4)2∙6H2O/Mebta reaction solution in EtOH, the expected complex [Zn(Mebta)4](ClO4)2 (7) was isolated in 45% yield after slow diffusion of Et2O into the reaction solution, Equation (7). Addition of an excess of NH4(PF6) in the 1:4 Zn(ClO4)2∙6H2O/Mebta reaction solution in EtOH (a metathesis reaction), followed by slow diffusion of n-hexane, resulted in the precipitation of [Zn(Mebta)4](PF6)2 (8) in ~60% yield, Equation (8).
Zn ( ClO 4 ) 2 · 6 H 2 O + 4 Mebta   → E t O H [ Zn ( Mebta ) 4 ] ( ClO 4 ) 2 + 6 H 2 O
                                  7
Zn ( ClO 4 ) 2 · 6 H 2 O + 4 Mebta + 2 NH 4 ( PF 6 )   → E t O H [ Zn ( Mebta ) 4 ] ( PF 6 ) 2 + 2 NH 4 ( ClO 4 ) + 6 H 2 O
                           8

2.2. Description of Structures

The structures of 3–7 were determined by single-crystal X-ray crystallography. Various structural plots are shown in Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figures S1–S8. Selected distances and angles are listed in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3.
The molecular structures of 3 and 4 (Figure 2, Figure 3, Figures S1 and S2) are similar, but the complexes are not isomorphous. The crystals contain neutral [ZnX2(Mebta)2] (X = Br, I) molecules. The ZnII atom is coordinated by two halo (or halido) groups and two nitrogen atoms, the latter from two monodentate Mebta ligands. The molecules of Mebta utilize the N atoms at position 3 of the azole rings as donor sites. The ligand molecules are nearly planar. The coordination geometry of the metal ion is distorted tetrahedral, the donor atom–ZnII-donor atom bond angles being in the ranges 104.2(1)–116.4(3)° and 104.0(1)–115.4(1)° for 3 and 4, respectively. Interligand repulsions between the negatively charged and large halides presumably are responsible for the observed distortion; the Br-Zn-Br and I-Zn-I are the largest and have values of 116.4(3) and 115.4(1)°, respectively. The ZnII–N bond lengths are typical for tetrahedral Zn(II) complexes [56]. The N-N bond distances are almost equal, ranging from 1.317(7) to 1.335(4) Å, implying that the Inorganics 11 00356 i001 description of Mebta (Figure 1) might be slightly different due to coordination; this has as a consequence the small decrease of the double bond character between the nitrogen atoms at positions 2 and 3 of the azole ring. The decrease of the double bond character of the triazole ring would be expected as consequence of coordination. The Zn-I bond distances are larger than the Zn-Br ones by ca. 0.2 Å, as expected.
In the crystal structure of 3, the [ZnBr2(Mebta)2] molecules are stacked along the a axis forming chains through π–π interactions involving the N1-, N2-, and N3-containing Mebta ligands. The distances of the planes of neighboring, centrosymmetrically related ligands are 3.54(1) Å (symmetry code: −x + 1, −y, −z + 1; light green dashed lines in Figure S3a) and 3.68(1) Å (symmetry code: −x + 2, −y, −z + 1; cyan dashed lines in Figure S3a). The other coordinated Mebta molecules (those containing N11, N12, N13, …), belonging to different chains, overlap through π–π interactions with their planes being 3.43(1) Å apart (symmetry code: −x + 2, −y, −z + 1; dark green dashed lines in Figure S3a), forming layers parallel to the (010) plane. Complex molecules belonging to neighboring chains also interact through C20(methyl carbon)-H(C20)∙∙∙Br2 (x − 1, y, z) H bonds. The layers are stacked along the b axis and interact through C20∙∙∙Br1 (x − 1, y + 1, z) H bonds, building the 3D architecture (Figure S3b).
In the crystal structure of 4, neighboring [ZnI2(Mebta)2] molecules interact through alternating N1N2N3C8C4C5C6C7C9/N1N2N3C8C4C5C6C7C9 (cyan dashed lines) and N11N12N13C18C14C15C16C17C19/N11N12N13C18C14C15C16C17C19 (light green dashed lines) π–π overlapping and centrosymmetrically related pairs of Mebta forming chains parallel to the a crystallographic axis (Figure 4a). The planes of the first pair of ligands are at 3.41(2) Å (symmetry code: −x, −y − 1, −z − 1) and those of the second are at 3.39(2) Å (symmetry code: −x + 1, −y + 1, −z + 1). Chains of neighboring molecules interact through C10∙∙∙I1 (x, −y − 3/2, z − 1/2) H bonds creating the 3D architecture of the structure (Figure 4b); the dimensions of this H bond are C10∙∙∙I1 3.986(6) Å, HB(C10)∙∙∙I1 3.303(1) Å, and C10-HB(C10)∙∙∙I1 165.2(3)°.
Compound 5 (Figure 5 and Figure S4) crystallizes in the triclinic space group P 1 ¯ with two tet-[Zn(NO3)2(Mebta)2] molecules in the unit cell. The ZnII atom is coordinated by two monodentate Mebta ligands (again the donor atom is the nitrogen at position 3 of the azole ring) and two practically monodentate nitrato groups. The coordination geometry at the metal ion is very distorted tetrahedral, with the donor atom–ZnII-donor atom angles being in the 87.9(1)–118.2(1)° range. The Zn∙∙∙O2 and Zn∙∙∙O6 interatomic distances are long, i.e., 2.588(5) and 2.722(6) Å, respectively. If these interactions are considered weakly bonding (in such a case, the nitrato groups are highly anisodentate), then the polyhedron around ZnII can be described as an extremely distorted octahedron; this viewpoint is illustrated in Figure 5. In the octahedral description of the coordination sphere, the trans pairs of the donor atoms cannot be defined and we thus favor the distorted tetrahedral description.
In the crystal structure of 5, the tet-[Zn(NO3)2(Mebta)2] molecules are stacked along the c axis forming chains through π–π interactions with the participation of the N1N2N3C8C4C5C6C7C9 coordinated Mebta molecules. The distances between the planes of neighboring, centrosymmetrically related ligands are 3.574(2) Å (symmetry code: −x + 1, −y, −z; light green dashed lines in Figure S5a) and 3.496(3) Å (symmetry code: −x + 1, −y, −z + 1; cyan dashed lines in Figure S5a). The Mebta ligands defined by atoms N11N12N13C18C14C15C16C17C19 of complex molecules belonging to neighboring chains overlap through π–π interactions, with the distance between the planes being 3.340(6) Å (symmetry code: −x + 1, −y + 1, −z; dark green dashed lines in Figure S5a), forming layers parallel to the (100) plane (Figure S5a). The layers are stacked along the a axis and interact through C20∙∙∙O3 (x + 1, y, z) H bonds, building the 3D structure (Figure S5b).
Complex 6 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c with four molecules in the unit cell. Its structure consists of well separated oct-[Zn(NO3)2(Mebta)2] (Figure 6 and Figure S6) molecules with two chelating nitrato groups and two monodentate Mebta ligands. The ZnII center sits on a crystallographic two-fold axis of symmetry (C2) which bisects the N3-Zn-N3′ angle. The coordination geometry of the metal ion is distorted octahedral. The ZnII-Onitrato bonds trans to N3 [2.388(2) Å] are longer than those trans to O [2.061(2) Å], thus resulting in a cis-cis-trans configuration. The difference in Zn-O bond lengths is due to the fact that in cis-cis-trans-bis(bidentate ligand)bis(monodentate ligand) metal complexes, one end donor site of the bidentate ligands is associated with less repulsion energy than the other [50]. The significant distortion of the octahedron is a consequence of the bidentate chelating nitrato groups and their small bite angle [56.9(1)°]. The nitrato ligand is planar, the sum of the O-N-O bond angles being exactly 360°. As expected, the O1-N4-O2 angle involving the coordinated oxygen atom is the smallest [116.1(2)°]. The chelating nature of the nitrato groups implies that the N-Onot-coordinated bond length is shorter [1.220(3) Å] than the N-Ocoordinated bond distances [1.244(3) and 1.275(3) Å]. The ZnII-N bond lengths in 6 [2.040(2) Å] are somewhat longer than the corresponding ones in 5 [1.995(2) and 1.996(2) Å], due to the higher coordination number of the metal ion in the former (six) than in the latter (four).
Complex 6 is isomorphous with compound oct-[Co(NO3)2(Mebta)2] [50]. The only difference is that the Co(II) derivative exhibits a more symmetric coordination of the nitrato ligand than 6 [Co-O 2.059(2) and 2.277(2) Å; Zn-O 2.061(2) and 2.388(2) Å]. A simple indication of the increase in the bidentate character of the nitrato groups according to the series ZnII < CoII is provided by observing the decrease in the M-O1-N bond angle; this bond angle is 101.8(2)° in 6 and 97.8(2)° for the Co(II) complex.
In the lattice structure of 6, the presence of π–π stacking interactions between Mebta ligands belonging to neighboring complex molecules result in the formation of zig-zag chains running parallel to the c axis (Figure S7a). The centrosymmetrically related ligands display an interplane distance of 3.545(4) Å (symmetry code: −x, -y, −z + 1; light green dashed lines in Figure S7a). The metal–metal distance within the chain is 9.087(2) Å. These zig-zag chains are further associated through C4∙∙∙O3 (−x − 1/2, y − 1/2, −z + 1/2) H bonds (orange dashed lines in Figure S7b), creating the overall 3D framework of the structure.
The crystal structure of 7 consists of [Zn(Mebta)4]2+ and ClO4− ions in a 1:2 ratio. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°) are given in Table 3. In the asymmetric unit of the cell of the compound, which crystallizes in the monoclinic space group I2/a, there is a mononuclear [Zn(Mebta)4]2+ cation, one ClO4− at general position, and two other ClO4− ions at positions where the chlorine atoms occupy sites with 2-fold symmetry, resulting in two anions per formula unit and thus ensuring charge neutrality. The perchlorate anions are tetrahedral. The ZnII center is coordinated to four Mebta ligands in a tetrahedral fashion. The tetrahedral coordination is almost ideal; the Zn-N bond lengths and N-Zn-N bond angles are in the ranges 1.981(2)–2.007(2) Å and 108.0(1)–111.0(1)°, respectively.
In the lattice of 7, the presence of π–π stacking interactions between Mebta ligands of neighboring cations results in the formation of layers parallel to the (−101) crystallographic plane with a brick wall arrangement (Figure 8). Three of the Mebta ligands on each cation interact with the corresponding ligands of three neighboring cations through centers of symmetry. The interplane distance between the N1N2N3C8C4C5C6C7C9/N1N2N3C8C4C5C6C7C9 (−x + 3/2, −y + 1/2, −z + 1/2) ligands is 3.318(8) Å (violet dashed lines in Figure 8); that between the N21N22N23C28C24C25C26C27C9 and its symmetry-related (−x + 1, −y + 1, −z) ligands is 3.37(1) Å (light green dashed lines in Figure 8); and that between the N31N32N33C38C34C35C36C37C39 and its symmetry-related partner (−x + 1, −y, −z) is 3.368(3) Å (cyan dashed lines in Figure 8). ClO4− ions are located above and below the layers, which either participate in the formation of the layers or serve as bridging units of neighboring layers, both types through C-H∙∙∙Operchlorate H bonds.
Crystals of [Zn(Mebta)4](PF6)2 (8) were also obtained but they showed poor diffraction. Repeating efforts to improve the quality of the crystals proved unsuccessful. However, we were able to collect data in order to establish the gross structural features of the complex. Some crystallographic data: Empirical formula C28H28ZnP2F12N12; formula weight 887.93; monoclinic space group I2/a; a = 17.6543(3) Å, b = 15.3889(2) Å, c = 25.9892(5) Å; β = 96.214(1)°; V = 7019.3(2) Å3; Z = 8. The data revealed that the structure of the complex consists of mononuclear tetrahedral [Zn(Mebta)4]2+ cations and PF6− anions. The structure of the cation is almost identical with that of complex 7. There are three crystallographically independent PF6− in the unit cell. One sits in a general position and the other two possess a 2-fold axis of symmetry. The former contributes one and the latter two each contribute half PF6− ions in the asymmetric unit of the cell, resulting in a total number of two anions. The fluorine atoms of the PF6− ion at the general position are disordered over two sites.

2.3. Spectroscopic and Physical Characterization in Brief

The complexes were characterized by a variety of physical and spectroscopic techniques in solution and in the solid state. Detailed assignments of the various spectroscopic features are provided in Section 3.2 under the preparation of each complex. Selected vibrational data (cm−1) are also listed in Table 4 and Table 5 for convenience. A few spectra are shown in Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figures S9–S16. The assignments are based on extensive literature studies, comparison of the spectroscopic characteristics between free Mebta and the complexes, and between complexes of a given family (e.g., 1–3), and our previous experience with coordination complexes of Mebta [49,50,51,52,53]. Here, we discuss some data of diagnostic value.
The molar conductivity values (ΛΜ) of 2, 7, and 8 are 153 (in MeNO2), 71 (in DMSO) and 79 (in DMSO) S cm2 mol−1 suggesting 1:2 electrolytes in these solvents [57], as expected from their ionic formulae. Somewhat to our surprise, the ΛΜ values for 1, 3, 4, and 5 in DMSO (68–81 S cm2 mol−1) are also indicative of 1:2 electrolytes. This suggests decomposition of the complexes, most probably through the reaction represented by Equation (9), where X = Cl, Br, I, NO3, and x = 4–6. This decomposition scheme is also supported by NMR spectroscopy (vide infra). In accordance with our proposal, the ΛΜ values of 1, 3, 4, and 6 in MeNO2 (this solvent has a negligible capacity for coordination) are 10, 12, 14, and 15 S cm2 mol−1, suggesting essentially non-electrolytes [57]. It should be mentioned at this point that the ΛΜ values of some neutral complexes (1, 3–5) in DMSO appear to be intermediate between those reported [57] for 1:1 and 1:2 electrolytes. This might indicate the presence of singly charged species in solution, e.g., [Zn(DMSO)x−1X]+ and X−. Thus, the decomposition scheme illustrated in Equation (9) can be considered as oversimplified.
[ ZnX 2 ( Mebta ) 2 ] + x dmso   → d 6 − D M S O [ Zn ( d 6 - DMSO ) x ] 2 + + 2 X − + 2 Mebta
The 1H NMR spectrum of Mebta in d6-DMSO shows a singlet signal (3H) at δ 4.34 ppm, a triplet signal (1H) at δ 7.42 ppm, a triplet (1H) at δ 7.57 ppm, a doublet (1H) at δ 7.86 ppm, and a doublet (1H) at δ 8.06 ppm, assigned to the protons attached to carbons at the positions 10 (-CH3), 5, 6, 7, and 4 (see numbering scheme in Figure 1), respectively [49,58,59,60]. The 13C[1H] NMR spectrum of Mebta in d6-DMSO shows resonances (assignments in parentheses) at δ 34.2(CH3), 119.1(C4), 124.0(C5), 110.7(C7), 145.3(C8), 133.5(C9), and 127.2(C6) [11,49,60]; assignments were also aided by the APT (Attached Proton Test) technique. The 1H and 13C[1H] NMR spectra of 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 in d6-DMSO are identical to those of free Mebta, supporting their decomposition in solution. The decomposition of 7 and 8, which was not reported earlier (due to their ionic character which makes the ΛΜ values not diagnostic), can be represented by Equation (10), X = ClO4, PF6, and x = 4–6.
[ Zn ( Mebta ) 4 ] X 2 + x ( d 6 - DMSO )   → d 6 − D M S O [ Zn ( d 6 - DMSO ) X ] 2 + + 2 X − + 2 Mebta
Thermal decomposition data (TG/DTG) are available for compounds 1–4 and 6. For (MebtaH)2[ZnCl4] (2), the data show a mass loss of 16.0% between 150 and 205 °C corresponding to the elimination of two moles of HCl per mole of the complex (theoretical value: 15.3%). The IR and far-IR spectra of the solid obtained after heating at 210 °C are identical with those of [ZnCl2(Mebta)2] (1), supporting the proposed decomposition illustrated by Equation (3). At temperatures above 220 °C, the solid sample decomposes in the same manner as the authentic complex 1. The solid complexes 1 and 3 decompose in a similar manner. The first decomposition occurs at ~170–230 °C and corresponds to the loss of one mole of Mebta per mole of complex (experimental values: 33.0% for 1 and 27.2% for 3; theoretical values: 33.1% for 1 and 27.1% for 3). There is a small plateau between ca. 230 and 250 °C, and at higher temperatures, the decomposition takes place in two steps up to 650 °C. The thermally stable ZnX2(Mebta) (X = Cl, Br) intermediates 1a and 3a, obtained after an isothermal TG experiment at 230 °C, were isolated and studied by IR and far-IR spectra (vide infra). Attempts to recrystallize and obtain single crystals of 1a and 3a were unsuccessful. The iodido complex 4 decomposes similarly, but there is no plateau after the first Mebta elimination, indicating that a species with the empirical formula ZnI2(Mebta) is not thermally stable. Complex oct-[Zn(NO3)2(Mebta)2] is thermally stable up to 175 °C. The decomposition occurs in two steps (with no indication of one or two Mebta elimination) and the final plateau > 250 °C probably corresponds to ZnO as evidenced by mass calculations (experimental value at 650 °C: 18.0%; theoretical value for ZnO as a final residue: 17.9%). We did not further pursue the characterization of the final residue.
The presence of H-bonded MebtaH+ ions in (MebtaH)2[ZnCl4] (2) is proven by the appearance of the characteristics broad ν(N+H) IR band at 3200–2830 cm−1 [50]. The IR spectrum of free Mebta exhibits two strong-to-medium intensity bands at 1197 and 1110 cm−1 associated with the νas(NNN) and νs(NNN) modes, respectively [52]. These bands/peaks are shifted to ca. 1220 and 1140 cm−1, respectively, in the spectra of 1 and 3-7; the same trend is observed in the spectrum of 2 that contains the 1-methylbenzotriazolium cation. These shifts are compatible, with N3 (see the numbering scheme of Figure 1) being the donor atom to ZnII or the protonation site [50,52]. The monodentate coordination of Mebta is also responsible for the two IR bands at ca. 780 and 750 cm−1; the lower wavenumber band is stronger and assigned to a C-H out-of-plane vibration, and the higher wavenumber one is due to a vibration involving both triazole and benzene in-plane bending [52]. The corresponding Raman peaks are located at ca. 780 and 745 cm−1.
The far-IR spectra of 1 and 3–5 (Figure 9 and Figure 10 for 1 and 3, respectively) exhibit the two ν(ZnX) (X = Cl, Br, I, ONO2) and the two ν(ZnN) bands in the regions expected for pseudotetrahedral C2ν point group symmetry [61]; the corresponding Raman peaks are visible at approximately the same wavenumbers. In the spectrum of 2, a very intense band is assigned to the asymmetric stretching T2 mode of [ZnCl4]2− (assuming Td point group symmetry). The same symmetry also applies to 7 and 8 and the strong band at ca. 290 cm−1 is attributed to the asymmetric T2 mode of [Zn(Mebta)4]2+ [61]. The higher wavenumbers of ν(ZnN) in 5 compared with those in 6 suggest stronger Zn-N bonds in the former than in the latter (confirmed by crystallography), a consequence of the lower coordination number of ZnII in 5 than in 6 (four vs. six). The molecule of 6 can be approximately considered as cis (C2ν) of the MX4Y2 type. This is expected to give four Zn-O stretching (2A + B1 + B2) and two Zn-N stretching (A1 + B1) modes, all of which are IR- as well as Raman- active. These modes are actually observed (Table 4), the only difference being the appearance of three (instead of four) Zn-O stretches.
The spectrum of 7 (Figure S13) exhibits strong bands at 1112 and 630 cm−1 attributable [61] to the ν3(F2)[νd(ClO)] and ν4(F2)[δd(OClO)] vibrations of the uncoordinated tetrahedral Td ClO4− ions. The PF6− ion belongs to Oh point group and should exhibit the IR-active vibrations ν3(F1u)[ν(PF)] and ν4(F1u)[δ(FPF)]; these are located [61] at 834 and 558 cm−1, respectively, in the IR spectrum of 8 (Figure S14).
Finally, the IR spectra of 5 and 6 can differentiate between the monodentate (5) and bidentate (6) nitrato groups. In the former, the bands at 1450 and 1309 cm−1 are assigned to the ν5(B2)[νas(NO2)] and ν1(A1)[νS(NO2)], respectively; their rather small separation (141 cm−1) is indicative of monodentate nitrates [61]. By contrast with 5, the IR spectrum of 6 shows the characteristic bands of bidentate nitrato ligands. The bands at 1500 (overlapped with an aromatic stretch) and 1275 cm−1 are assigned to the ν1(A1)[ν(N=O)] and ν5(B2)[νas(NO2)] modes, with their large separation (225 cm−1) being indicative of bidentate nitrates [61]. In some cases, the IR spectra of the two nitrato complexes exhibit a variable intensity band at 1384 cm−1, characteristic of the ν3(E’)[νd(NO)] mode of the planar ionic nitrate [61]; such nitrates do not exist in the crystal structures of 5 and 6. The appearance of this band indicates that an amount of the nitrato ligands in the samples are replaced by bromides that are present in excess in the KBr matrix (used for the preparation of the pellets), thus producing ionic nitrates (KNO3) [62,63]; this replacement is facilitated by the pressure used. In accordance with this conclusion, the band at 1384 cm−1 is always absent from the Raman spectra of 6 and it appears more often in the IR spectrum of 5 in which the monodentate nitrato ligands are replaced more easily by bromides compared with 6, which contains bidentate nitrates.
The far-IR spectra of solids 1a and 3a with the empirical formula ZnX2(Mebta) (X = Cl, 1a; X = Br, 3a), obtained from the thermal decomposition of 1 and 3, respectively, exhibit far-IR bands attributable to both terminal and bridging halido (Cl−, Br−) ligands. Thus, the spectrum of 1a exhibits strong bands at 350 and 229 cm−1 which are due to the ν(ZnCl)t and ν(ZnCl)b vibrations [61], respectively. Similarly, the strong bands at 240 and 167 cm−1 in the spectrum of 3b are assigned to the ν(ZnBr)t and ν(ZnBr)b modes [61], respectively. The ν(ZnN) vibrations appear at 243 (1a) and 263 (3a) cm−1. These spectroscopic features suggest polymeric structures for 1a and 3a possessing both terminal and bridging halido groups; we tentatively propose a {ZnII(Xt)(Xb)2N} coordination sphere with tetrahedral coordination at ZnII.

2.4. Theoretical Calculations

Prompted by the experimental facts that (i) Mebta always behaves as a monodentate ligand with N3 as the donor atom [50,51,52,53] and present work; and (ii) the nitrato complexes 5 and 6, although isostoichiometric, exhibit two different stereochemistries, we performed a quantum-chemical investigation in an attempt to understand these aspects. Thus, a theoretical investigation was undertaken at the ab initio level (MP2) in ethanolic solution of Mebta (EtOH is the most often used solvent for the preparation of its metal complexes), followed by DFT studies in the gas phase for the two nitrato complexes. Data are presented in Figure 11, Figure S17 and Figure S18, and Table 6 and Tables S1–S6.
Concerning the former issue, the most salient feature of the ground-state electronic structure of Mebta is its three (out of five) highest energy filled orbitals OMOs HOMO, HOMO-3, and HOMO-5, which are schematically depicted in Figure 11. Unlike HOMO which is a π-type orbital, both HOMO-3 and HOMO-5 are σ-type mostly “lone pair” on N3 and N2, respectively. Moreover, contrary to HOMO-3, centered mostly on N3 and being only about 0.1 a.u. lower in energy than the HOMO, HOMO-5 (centered mostly on N2) is about 0.2 a.u. lower. The latter energy differences, along with (a) the σ-type nature of the two HOMOs (b) the high frontier density Pr(HOMO-3) [64] and Pr(HOMO-5) values, calculated for the N3 and N2 atoms (0.41 and 0.29, respectively), and (c) the high calculated, negative neutral atomic charge [65,66,67] for N3 only (qr = −0.31 |e|) (that of N2 is −0.04 |e|), strongly suggest that only the N3 atom should be a nucleophilic center for M L m − 1 n +   attack of the Mebta ligand. In particular, this nucleophilic attack, possibly being a HOMO-3 (Mebta)-LUMO ( M L m − 1 n + ) interaction, should be mostly charge- rather than frontier orbital-controlled.
Although comparison between gas-phase calculations and single-crystal crystallographic studies is not allowed, we see that the DFT gas-phase structures of both 5 and 6 are almost identical with the experimental ones (Figures S17 and S18). Moreover, both BSI and BSII models used afforded almost identical structural data (Tables S1 and S2), closely resembling the crystallographic data. Additionally, based upon the Mulliken population analysis atom by atom data and the Wiberg bond indices, conclusions for the coordination bond strengths could also be drawn. Based on the data shown in Table 6, it is seen that the Zn-N bonds appear to be of rather comparable strength with the shorter Zn-O ones, in close agreement with results from several Zn(II) complexes containing nitrato ligands and monodentate N-donors. It should be also stressed that in both complexes, the longer Zn-O bonds or bonding interactions appear as weak ones (since they present small positive corresponding values) in close agreement with the experimental structural data. Finally, based upon the sum of electronic and thermal enthalpy values, complex 6 appears thermodynamically slightly more stable by ca. 0.7 kcal/mol (BSII) than 5 in the gas phase (Table S6).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials and Instrumentation

All manipulations were performed under aerobic conditions. Reagent and solvents were purchased from Alfa Aesar and Sigma-Aldrich and used as received. The purity of 1-methylbenzotriazole (Mebta) was checked by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Deionized water was received from in-house facility. Safety note: Zn(ClO4)2∙6H2O, Mebta, and its complexes are potentially explosive, and caution should be exercised in handling such materials. The use of plastic spatula is recommended. The small quantities used in this study did not cause any problem.
Carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen microanalyses were performed by the Instrumental Analysis Center of the University of Patras. Conductivity measurements were carried out at 25 °C with a Metrohm-Herisau E-527 bridge and a cell of standard constant. Thermogravimetric (TG) and differential thermogravimetric (DTG) data (30–650 °C) were obtained on a Dupont R90 device equipped with a 951 TG analyzer under a N2 gas flow (50 cm3 min−1). Sample weights of 10–15 mg and heating rates of 1 and 5 °C min−1 were used. FT IR spectra (4000–450 cm−1) were recorded using a PerkinElmer 16PC spectrometer with samples prepared as KBr pellets under pressure. FΤ far-IR spectra (400–40 cm−1) were recorded as a Bruker IFS 113v spectrometer using polyethylene pellets. Raman spectra were obtained using a Spex spectrometer (model 1403) equipped with an Ar+ laser of Spectra Physics (model 2020). The excitation was performed at 514.5 nm with an output power of 60–300 mW depending on the sample. Some spectra were recorded with an Instruments S.A. spectrometer equipped with a Kr+ laser of Spectra Physics (model 164); the excitation was performed at 647.1 nm. 1H NMR spectra in d6-DMSO (isotopic purity >99.5%) were recorded on Varian EM-390 (90 MHz), FT Bruker WM-250 (250 MHz), and FT Bruker AM-400 (400.13 MHz) spectrometers; the signal of TMS was used as reference. Proton-decoupled 13C spectra in d6-DMSO were recorded on a Varian XL-300 spectrometer using 1,4-dioxane as reference compound. Some 13C[1H] NMR spectra were also recorded applying the APT technique.

3.2. Syntheses of the Complexes

3.2.1. [ZnCl2(Mebta)2] (1)

Method (a): To a stirred, colorless solution of ZnCl2 (0.034 g, 0.25 mmol) in EtOH (10 mL) was added solid Mebta (0.067 g, 0.50 mmol). The solid soon dissolved and the resulting solution was stirred for a further 10 min during which time a very small quantity of a beige solid appeared. The reaction mixture was filtered and the filtrate stored at −10 °C. After 1 d, colorless crystals of the product were precipitated, which were collected by filtration, washed with cold EtOH (1 mL) and Et2O (2 × 2 mL), and dried in air. Yield: 35%. Anal. Calcd. (%) for C14H14N6ZnCl2: C, 41.76; H, 3.51; N, 20.88. Found (%): C, 41.52; H, 3.57; N, 21.18. ΛΜ (DMSO, 25 °C, 10−3 M) = 70 S cm2 mol−1. ΛΜ (MeNO2, 25 °C, 10−3 M) = 10 S cm2 mol−1. Selected IR and far-IR data (cm−1): 1218s, νas(NNN); 1136m, νs(NNN); 324s, νas(ZnCl)t; 300s, νs(ZnCl)t; 274m, νas(ZnN); 240m, νs(ZnN). Selected Raman peaks (cm−1): 1226m, νas(NNN); 1140s, νs(NNN); 325m, νas(ZnCl)t; 300s, νs(ZnCl)t; 270m, νas(ZnN); 249s, νs(ZnN). 1H NMR (d6-DMSO, δ/ppm; since the spectrum of the complex is identical with that of free Mebta, the numbering scheme of protons follows Figure 1): 8.06 (d, 2H/H4), 7.86 (d, 2H/H7), 7.57 (t, 2H/H6), 7.42 (t, 2H/H5), 4.34 (s, 6H/-CH3). 13C[1H] NMR (d6-DMSO, δ/ppm; since the spectrum of the complex is identical with that of free Mebta, the numbering scheme of carbons is the same with that used in Figure 1): 145.21(C8), 133.45(C9), 127.25(C6), 124.03(C5), 119.09(C4), 110.71(C7), 34.30(C10).
Method (b): Complex (MebtaH)2[ZnCl4] (2) decomposes at 150–205 °C under N2. The mass loss corresponds to the elimination of two moles of HCl per mole of 2 (experimental value: 16.0%; theoretical value: 15.3%). A plateau is visible at 205–220 °C. The thermally stable intermediate, obtained after an isothermal TG experiment at 210 °C, was collected. The IR, far-IR, and 1H NMR spectra of this intermediate are identical with those of authentic 1 isolated with method (a).

3.2.2. (MebtaH)2[ZnCl4] (2)

ZnCl2 (0.260 g, 1.91 mmol) and Mebta (0.510 g, 3.80 mmol) were easily dissolved in concentrated hydrochloric acid (5 mL, 60 mmol). The resulting pale-yellow solution was allowed to slowly evaporate at ~50 °C (water bath) in the hood until it reached a volume of 3 mL. The solution was cooled in an ice bath for a few hours. A solid was precipitated which was collected by filtration, washed with cold EtOH (2 × 3 mL) and Et2O (5 × 5 mL), and dried in air overnight. The solid decomposes slowly in the normal laboratory atmosphere releasing gaseous HCl. Yield: 42%. Anal. Calcd. (%) for C14H16N6ZnCl4: C, 35.36; H, 3.40; N, 17.68. Found (%): C, 35.78; H, 3.33; N, 17.19. ΛΜ (MeNO2, 25 °C, 10−3 M) = 153 S cm2 mol−1. Selected IR and far-IR data (cm−1): 3202mb, 3097mb, and 3059mb, ν(Ν+H); 1222s, νas(NNN); 1138m, νs(NNN); 293s, ν(ZnCl)t (T2 in Td). The ionic complex is insoluble in DMSO and no satisfactory 1H NMR spectra could be obtained.

3.2.3. [ZnBr2(Mebta)2] (3)

To a solution of ZnBr2 (0.056 g, 0.25 mmol) in EtOH (4 mL) was added a solution of Mebta (0.067 g, 0.50 mmol) in the same solvent (4 mL). The resulting solution was stirred for 30 min, during which time a very small amount of a beige solid appeared. The reaction mixture was filtered and the filtrate was left undisturbed in a closed flask. X-ray quality colorless crystals of the product were precipitated within 36 h. The crystals were collected by filtration, washed with cold EtOH (2 mL) and Et2O (2 × 2 mL), and dried in air. Yield: 65%. Anal. Calcd. (%) for C14H14N6ZnBr2: C, 34.21; H, 2.88; N, 17.10. Found (%): C, 34.19; H, 3.01; N, 16.78. ΛΜ (DMSO, 25 °C, 10−3 M) = 68 S cm2 mol−1. ΛΜ (MeNO2, 25 °C, 10−3 M) = 12 S cm2 mol−1. Selected IR and far-IR data (cm−1): 1218s, νas(NNN); 1135m, νs(NNN); 243s, νas(Zn-Br)t/νs(Zn-N); 219s, νs(Zn-Br)t; 275s, νas(Zn-N). Selected Raman peaks (cm−1): 1224m, νas(NNN); 1140s, νs(NNN); 246m, νas(ZnBr)t/νs(ZnN); 220s, νs(ZnBr)t; 271m, νas(ZnN). 1H NMR (d6-DMSO, δ/ppm; since the spectrum is almost identical with that of Mebta, the proton’s numbering scheme follows Figure 1): 8.04 (d, 2H/H4), 7.87 (d, 2H/H7), 7.57 (t, 2H/H6), 7.42 (t, 2H/H5), 4.33 (s, 6H/-CH3). 13C[1H] NMR (d6-DMSO, δ/ppm; since the spectrum of the complex is identical with that of Mebta, the numbering scheme of carbons is the same adopted in Figure 1): 145.26(C8), 133.48(C9), 127.16(C6), 123.92(C5), 119.07(C4), 110.67(C7), 34.15(C10).

3.2.4. [ZnI2(Mebta)2] (4)

A solution of ZnI2 (0.080 g, 0.25 mmol) in EtOH (4 mL) was added to a solution of Mebta (0.067 g, 0.50 mmol) in the same solvent (4 mL). The resulting solution was stirred for 30 min, during which time a large amount of a beige solid was precipitated. The solid was filtered and redissolved in MeOH (6 mL). The pale-yellow solution was stored at −10 °C. After 5 d, colorless X-ray quality crystals of the product were grown which were collected by filtration, washed with cold EtOH (2 mL) and Et2O (2 × 2 mL), and dried in air. Yield: 25%. Anal. Calcd. (%) for C14H14N6ZnI2: C, 28.72; H, 2.41; N, 14.36. Found (%): C, 28.90; H, 2.34; N, 14.51. ΛΜ (DMSO, 25 °C, 10−3 M) = 67 S cm2 mol−1. ΛΜ (MeNO2, 25 °C, 10−3 M) = 14 S cm2 mol−1. Selected IR and far-IR data (cm−1): 1219s, νas(NNN); 1132m, νs(NNN); 208s, νas(ZnI)t; 189s, νs(ZnI)t; 263m, νas(ZnN); 248m, νs(ZnN). Selected Raman peaks (cm−1): 1233w and 1224m, νas(NNN); 1136s, νs(NNN); 208m, νas(ZnI)t; 182s, νs(ZnI)t; 263m, νas(ZnN); 246m, νs(ZnN). 1H NMR (d6-DMSO, δ/ppm; same proton numbering scheme as in Figure 1): 8.04 (d, 2H/H4), 7.86 (d, 2H/H7), 7.57 (t, 2H/H6), 7.41 (t, 2H/H5), 4.33 (s, 6H/-CH3). APT 13C[1H] NMR (d6-DMSO, δ/ppm; same carbon numbering scheme as in Figure 1): Up signals: 145.24(C8), 133.47(C9). Down signals: 127.22(C6), 123.98(C5), 119.08(C4), 110.68(C7), 34.27(C10).

3.2.5. tet-[Zn(NO3)2(Mebta)2] (5)

To a stirred solution of Zn(NO3)2∙4H2O (0.830 g, 3.60 mmol) in EtOH (10 mL) was added dropwise a solution of Mebta (1.000 g, 7.50 mmol) in the same solvent. During the addition, a white solid was precipitated, which was filtered, washed with EtOH (2 × 4 mL) and Et2O (3 × 5 mL), and dried in a vacuum desiccator over silica gel. Yield: 51%. X-ray quality crystals of the product were obtained by performing the same reaction under conditions of high dilution (0.36 mmol of the zinc source and 0.75 mmol of Mebta in 15 mL of EtOH) without stirring during the addition of Mebta (no precipitation took place). The powder and the crystals had identical IR spectra. Anal. Calcd. (%) for C14H14N8ZnO6: C, 36.89; H, 3.10; N, 24.59. Found (%): C, 37.30; H, 3.00; N, 24.90. ΛΜ (DMSO, 25 °C, 10−3 M) = 72 S cm2 mol−1. Selected IR and far-IR data (cm−1): 1220s, νas(NNN); 1139m, νs(NNN); 1450m, ν5(B2)[νas(NO2)]; 1309m, ν1(A1)[νs(NO2)]; 348s, νas(ZnONO2); 300m, νs(ZnONO2); 291s, νas(ZnN); 263m, νs(ZnN). 1H NMR (d6-DMSO, δ/ppm; same proton numbering scheme as in Figure 1): 8.03 (d, 2H/H4), 7.87 (d, 2H/H7), 7.58 (t, 2H/H6), 7.42 (t, 2H/H5), 4.33 (s, 6H/-CH3). 13C[1H] NMR (d6-DMSO, δ/ppm; same carbon numbering scheme as in Figure 1): 145.29(C8), 133.50(C9), 127.14(C6), 123.89(C5), 119.06(C4), 110.60(C7), 34.09(C10).

3.2.6. oct-[Zn(NO3)2(Mebta)2] (6)

To a stirred solution of Zn(NO3)2∙4H2O (0.830 g, 3.60 mmol) in EtOH (10 mL) was added triethyl orthoformate (3 mL). The colorless solution obtained was heated at 55 °C for 45 min (the final volume was ca. 8 mL) and allowed to cool at room temperature. This solution was added dropwise to a stirred solution of Mebta (1.000 g, 7.50 mmol). During the addition, a white solid was precipitated, which was filtered, washed with EtOH (2 × 4 mL) and Et2O (3 × 5 mL), and dried in a vacuum desiccator over P4O10. Yield: 62%. X-ray quality crystals of the product were obtained by performing the same reaction under conditions of high dilution (0.36 mmol of the zinc source, 1 mL of triethyl orthoformate, and 0.75 mmol of Mebta in 15 mL of EtOH), without stirring during the addition of Mebta (no precipitation took place). The microcrystalline powder and the crystals had identical IR spectra. Anal. Calcd. (%) for C14H14N8ZnO6: C, 36.89; H, 3.10; N, 24.59. Found (%): C, 36.64; H, 3.02; N, 24.47. ΛΜ (DMSO, 25 °C, 10−3 M) = 81 S cm2 mol−1. ΛΜ (MeNO2, 25 °C, 10−3 M) = 15 S cm2 mol−1. Selected IR and far-IR data (cm−1): 1220s, νas(NNN); 1137m, νs(NNN); 1500s, ν1(A1)[ν(N=O)]/aromatic stretch; 1275m, ν5(B2)[νas(NO2)]; 326w, 292sh, 274s and 255sh, ν(ZnO)t; 274s and 242m, ν(ZnN), the former vibration overlapping with a stretching Zn-O mode. Selected Raman peaks (cm−1): 1228m, νas(NNN); 1141m, νs(NNN); 1513s, ν1(A1)[ν(N=O)]/aromatic stretch; 1282m, ν5(B2)[νas(NO2)]; 326m, 270s, 260m, ν(ZnO)t; 270s, 248m, ν(ZnN), the former overlapping with a stretching Zn-O mode. The 1H NMR and 13C[1H] NMR spectra of the complex in d6-DMSO are identical with the corresponding ones of compound 5.

3.2.7. [Zn(Mebta)4](ClO4)2 (7)

To a stirred solution of Zn(ClO4)2∙6H2O (0.074 g, 0.20 mmol) in EtOH (2 mL) was slowly added a solution of Mebta (0.107 g, 0.80 mmol) in the same solvent (13 mL). The resulting pale beige solution was stirred for a further 30 min and layered with Et2O (5 mL). Slow mixing gave X-ray quality, colorless crystals of the product after 2 d. The crystals were collected by filtration, washed with cold EtOH (1 mL) and Et2O (2 × 2 mL), and dried in air. Yield: 45%. Anal. Calcd. (%) for C28H28N12ZnCl2O8: C, 42.20; H, 3.55; N, 21.10. Found (%): C, 42.60; H, 3.25; N, 21.47. ΛΜ (DMSO, 25 °C, 10−3 M) = 71 S cm2 mol−1. Selected IR and far-IR data (cm−1): 1218m, νas(NNN); 1144s, νs(NNN); 1112s, ν3(F2)[νd(ClO)]; 630s, ν4(F2)[δd(OClO)]; 288s, ν(ZnN)[T2]. 1H NMR (d6-DMSO, δ/ppm; since the spectrum of the complex is practically identical with that of free Mebta, the numbering schemes of protons follows Figure 1): 8.06 (d, 4H/H4), 7.87 (d, 4H/H7), 7.55 (t, 4H/H6), 7.46 (t, 4H/H5), 4.32 (s, 12H/-CH3). 13C[1H] NMR (d6-DMSO, δ/ppm; same carbons’ numbering scheme as in Figure 1): 145.27(C8), 133.51(C9), 127.27(C6), 123.96(C5), 119.13(C4), 110.68(C7), 34.23(C10).

3.2.8. [Zn(Mebta)4](PF6)2 (8)

To a stirred solution of Mebta (0.107 g, 0.80 mmol) in EtOH (2 mL) was added a solution of NH4(PF6) (0.130 g, 0.80 mmol) in EtOH (8 mL) and the resulting solution was stirred for a further 10 min. This solution was combined with a solution of Zn(ClO4)2∙6H2O (0.074 g, 0.20 mmol) in the same solvent (2 mL). The final reaction solution was layered with n-hexane (5 mL). Slow mixing gave medium quality crystals after 2 d. The crystals were collected by filtration, washed with EtOH (2 mL) and Et2O (2 × 2 mL), and dried in air. Yield: 59%. Anal. Calcd. (%) for C28H28N12ZnP2F12: C, 37.87; H, 3.18; N, 18.93. Found (%): C, 38.27; H, 2.99; N, 19.13. ΛΜ (DMSO, 25 °C, 10−3 M) = 79 S cm2 mol−1. IR and far-IR data (cm−1): 1226m, νas(NNN); 1170w, νs(NNN); 834s, ν3(F1u)[ν(PF)]; 558m, ν4(F1u)[δ(FPF)]; 287s, ν(ZnN)[T2]. 1H NMR (d6-DMSO, δ/ppm; same protons’ numbering scheme as in Figure 1): 8.04 (d, 4H/H4), 7.87 (d, 4H/H7), 7.56 (t, 4H/H6), 7.45 (t, 4H/H5), 4.33 (s, 12H/-CH3). 13C[1H] NMR (d6-DMSO, δ/ppm; same numbering scheme of carbons as in Figure 1): 145.28(C8), 133.52(C9), 127.27(C6), 123.95(C5), 119.14(C4), 110.66(C7), 34.25(C10).

3.3. Single-Crystal X-ray Crystallography

Colorless crystals of 3, 4, and 7 were taken directly from the mother liquor and immediately cooled to 160 K (−113 °C). Diffraction data were collected on a Rigaku R-Axis Image Plate diffractometer using graphite-monochromated Cu Kα radiation. Data collection (ω-scans) and processing (cell refinement, data reduction, and empirical/numerical correction) were performed using the CrystalClear program package [68]. A colorless crystal of 6 was mounted in air and covered with epoxy glue. Diffraction measurements were performed on a Crystal Logic Dual Goniometer diffractometer using graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation. Unit cell dimensions were determined by using the angular settings of 25 automatically centered reflections in the range 11 < 2θ < 23°. A colorless crystal of 5 was also mounted in air and covered with epoxy glue. Diffraction data were collected on a P21 Nicolet diffractometer upgraded by Crystal Logic using graphite-monochromated Cu Kα radiation. Unit cell dimensions were determined by using the angular settings of 25 automatically centered reflections in the range 22 < 2θ < 54°. Intensity data for 5 and 6 were recorded using a θ-2θ scan; three standard reflections, monitored every 97 reflections, showed less than 3% variation and no decay. Lorentz and polarization corrections were applied using Crystal Logic software.
The structures were solved by direct methods using SHELXS, ver. 2013/1 [69] and refined by full-matrix least squares techniques on F2 with SHELXL, ver. 2014/6 [70]. Plots of the structures were drawn using the Diamond 3 program package [71]. For the structures of 3, 5, 6, and 7, H atoms were located by difference maps and refined isotropically; all non-H atoms were refined anisotropically. For 4, H atoms were introduced at calculated positions as riding on their corresponding bonded atoms; all non-H atoms were refined anisotropically. In the structure of 7, there are three crystallographically independent perchlorates in the asymmetric unit; two sit on a 2-fold axis of symmetry and the third sits on a general position. The former two each contribute half ClO4− ions in the asymmetric unit of the cell and the third contributes one. Crystallographic data can be found in Tables S7 and S8; more details are in the CIF files. Some crystallographic data for 8, whose structure is of rather poor quality, have already been mentioned in part 2.2 (“Description of Structures”).
Crystallographic data were deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center, Nos. 2286175-2286179. Copies of the data can be obtained free of charge upon application to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EZ: Telephone: +(44)-1223-336033; E-mail: [email protected], or via https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures/ (accessed on 20 June 2023).

3.4. Computational Details

The MP2 [72,73,74,75,76] ab initio methodology was applied on the free Mebta molecule with the 6+31+G(d) basis set in EtOH solution (all its complexes in this work were prepared in this solvent), using the polarized continuum model (PCM) [77] for the treatment of the solvent effects. The DFT methodology with ωw97XD functional [78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88] (containing empirical dispersion terms and long-range corrections and thus providing good descriptions of the reaction profiles, including geometries, heats of reactions, and barrier heights) was used for complexes 5 and 6, as implemented in the Gaussian09 programs suite [83]. Two different calculations were performed for each complex. In the first denoted as BSI, which does not include relativistic effects for the Zn atom, the 6-311+G(d,p) basis set was used for all atoms. In the second one denoted as BSII, which includes relativistic effects for the Zn atom, the Def2-TZVP [84,85,86,87,88] basis set was used for all atoms. Full geometry optimizations with no symmetry constraints were performed for the compounds. Harmonic frequencies were computed at the same level of theory, and the nature of the stationary points was determined in each case according to the number of the negative eigenvalues of the Hessian matrix (zero and one imaginary frequencies for the minima and transition states, respectively).

4. Concluding Comments and Perspectives

In this work, we reported the employment of Mebta in reactions with Zn(II) sources, which has resulted in the isolation of eight complexes. Thus, the empty position of Zn(II) in the “Periodic Table” of Mebta has now been filled in. The most salient features of this work are: (a) Mebta can form anionic (2), neutral (1, 3–6), and cationic (7, 8) complexes with interesting molecular structures; the anionic complex (MebtaH)2[ZnCl4] (2) undergoes solid-state decomposition yielding [ZnCl2(Mebta)2] (1) reflecting the high acidic character of the organic cation. (b) The reactions of Zn(NO3)2∙4H2O and Mebta have provided access to two isostoichiometric complexes, depending on the reaction conditions, with different stereochemistries at ZnII; this difference arises from the monodentate vs. bidentate coordination of the nitrato ligands. (c) The Mebta ligands favor the formation of 2D layers through π–π interactions in the structures of 3, 5, and 7; with the aid of H bonds developed among species belonging to neighboring layers, the 3D architecture of these compounds is built. Small changes in the arrangement of ligands observed in the structures of 4 and 6 result in the formation of chains through π–π interactions, and H-bonding interactions among molecules belonging to neighboring chains contribute to the construction of the architecture of these complexes. (d) The thermal decomposition of [ZnX2(Mebta)2] (X = Cl, 1; X = Br, 3) leads to stable intermediates (1a and 3a, respectively) with the 1:1 stoichiometry, i.e., ZnX2(Mebta), which are probably polymeric tetrahedral complexes containing monodentate Mebta, and both terminal and bridging halide groups; and (e) Liquid-phase (Mebta) and gas-phase (5, 6) DFT calculations satisfactorily explain the preference of Mebta for N3-coordination (and not N2-coordination) and the existence of 5 and 6 which seem to have a comparable thermodynamic stability.
With the knowledge and experience obtained in this work, our future research plans are directed, among others, to: (1) The use of carboxylate-containing Zn(II) starting materials in Mebta coordination chemistry; preliminary results show the preparation of coordination clusters, e.g., [Zn3(O2CR)6(Mebta)2], as a consequence of the great bridging capability of the carboxylate groups; (2) The study of the Cd(II)/Mebta general reaction system with the goal to establish similarities and differences in the behavior of Zn(II) and Cd(II), which are both group 12 metals; and (3) The extension of the Mebta reactions with other, except Fe(III) [51], trivalent [e.g., Ga(III), In(III), and Tl(III)] and tetravalent [e.g., Sn(IV) and Pb(IV)] metals in order to complete other empty positions in the “Periodic Table” of Mebta.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/inorganics11090356/s1. Figure S1: Partially labeled ball and stick representation of the structure of the molecule [ZnBr2(Mebta)2] that is present in 3; Figure S2: Partially labeled ball and stick representation of the structure of the molecule [ZnI2(Mebta)2] that is present in 4; Figure S3: Supramolecular characteristics of complex 3; Figure S4: Partially labeled ball and stick representation of the structure of the molecule tet-[Zn(NO3)2(Mebta)2] that is present in 5; Figure S5: Supramolecular characteristics of complex 5; Figure S6: Partially labeled ball and stick representation of the structure of the molecule oct-[Zn(NO3)2(Mebta)2] that is present in 6; Figure S7: Supramolecular characteristics of complex 6; Figure S8: Partially labeled ball and stick representation of the structure of the cation that is present in 7; Figure S9: The 13C[1H] NMR spectrum of Mebta in d6-DMSO; Figure S10: The 13C[1H] NMR spectrum of 1 in d6-DMSO; Figure S11: The APT 13C[1H] NMR spectrum of 4 in d6-DMSO; Figure S12: The IR spectrum of 1; Figure S13: The IR spectrum of 7; Figure S14: The IR spectrum of 8; Figure S15: The FT far-IR spectrum of 2; Figure S16: The FT far-IR spectrum of 6; Figure S17: X-ray and DFT calculated gas-phase structure of 5; Figure S18: X-ray and DFT calculated gas-phase structure of 6. Table S1: Experimental and computationally derived bond lengths and angles of 5; Table S2: Experimental and computationally derived bond lengths and angles of 6; Table S3: Calculated liquid-phase Cartesian coordinates of Mebta; Table S4: Calculated [wB97XD/6-311+G** protocol (BSI)] gas-phase Cartesian coordinates of 5 and 6; Table S5: Gas-phase Cartesian coordinates of 5 and 6, calculated by the wB97XD/Def2tzvp computational protocol (BSII); Table S6: Sum of electronic and thermal free energies (a.u.) of 5 and 6; Table S7: Crystallographic data and refinement parameters for 3 and 4; Table S8: Crystallographic data and refinement parameters for 5–7. The CIF and the check CIF output files are included in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

C.S. and E.B. contributed towards the synthesis, crystallization, and characterization of the complexes. J.C.P. synthesized some complexes and performed an extensive literature search; he also recorded the far-IR and 13C[1H] NMR spectra. M.M.S. contributed towards theoretical calculations. C.P.R. and V.P. solved the single-crystal X-ray structures; the latter also studied the supramolecular features of the reported structures and wrote the relevant part of the paper. E.G.B. performed detailed DFT studies and wrote the relevant part of the paper. J.C.P. and S.P.P. coordinated the research; the latter wrote the paper based on the detailed reports of the collaborators. All the authors exchanged opinions concerning the progress of the project and commented on the writing of the manuscript at all steps. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

C.P.R. and V.P. would like to thank the Special Account of the NCSR “Demokritos” for financial support concerning the operation of the X-ray facilities at INN through the internal program entitled “Structural Study and Characterization of Crystalline Materials” (NCSR “Demokritos”, ELKE ≠ 10813).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

S.P.P. would like to thank Professor Spyros Yiannopoulos for the purchase of a quantity of Mebta.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cotton, F.A.; Wilkinson, G.; Murillo, C.A.; Bochmann, M. Advanced Inorganic Chemistry, 6th ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1999; pp. 352–353. [Google Scholar]
  2. Katritzky, A.R.; Rachwall, S.; Hitchings, G.J. Benzotriazole: A Novel Auxiliary. Tetrahedron 1991, 47, 2683–2732. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hall, C.D.; Panda, S.S. The Benzotriazole Story. Adv. Heter. Chem. 2016, 119, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  4. Tomas, F.; Abboud, J.-L.M.; Laynez, J.; Notario, R.; Santos, L.; Nilsson, S.O.; Catalan, J.; Charamunt, R.M.; Elguero, J. Tautomerism and Aromaticity in 1,2,3-Triazoles: The Case of Benzotriazole. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 7348–7353. [Google Scholar]
  5. Catalan, J.; Claramunt, R.M.; Elguero, J.; Laynez, J.; Menendez, M.; Anvia, F.; Quian, J.H.; Taagepera, M.; Taft, R.W. Basicity and Acidity of Azoles: The Annelation Effect in Azoles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 4105–4111. [Google Scholar]
  6. Katritzky, A. N-Substituted Benzotriazoles: Properties, Reactivity and Synthetic Utility. Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg. 1992, 101, 409–413. [Google Scholar]
  7. Patel, P.; Patel, P.; Patel, S. Synthesis, Characterization, Chelating Properties and Biological Activities of Benzotriazole-Salicylic Acid Combined Molecule. Int. J. Pharm. Chem. Sci. 2012, 1, 1799–1804. [Google Scholar]
  8. Briguglio, I.; Piras, S.; Corona, P.; Gavini, E.; Nieddu, M.; Boatto, G.; Carta, A. Benzotriazole: An overview on its versatile biological behavior. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 97, 612–648. [Google Scholar]
  9. Krasevec, I.; Prosen, H. Solid-Phase Extraction of Polar Benzotriazoles as Environmental Pollutants: A Review. Molecules 2018, 23, 2501. [Google Scholar]
  10. Novak, I.; Abu-Izneid, T.; Kovacs, B.; Klasinc, L. Electronic Structure and Stability of Benzotriazoles. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 9751–9756. [Google Scholar]
  11. Claramunt, R.M.; Sanz, D.; Boyer, G.; Catalan, J.; de Paz, J.L.G.; Elguero, J. Experimental (13C and 15N NMR Spectroscopy) and Theoretical (6-31G) Study of the Protonation of N-Methylazoles and N-Methylbenzazoles. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1993, 31, 791–800. [Google Scholar]
  12. Catalan, J.; Perez, P.; Elguero, J. Structure of Benzotriazole in the Gas Phase: A UV Experimental Study. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 5276–5277. [Google Scholar]
  13. Thomas, S.; Venkateswaran, S.; Kapoor, S.; D’Cunha, R.; Mukherjee, T. Surface enhanced Raman scattering of benzotriazole: A molecular orientational study. Spectrochim. Acta A 2004, 60, 25–29. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sockalingum, D.; Fleischmann, M.; Musiani, M.M. Near-infrared Fourier transform surface-enhanced Raman scattering of azole copper corrosion inhibitors in aqueous chloride media. Spectrochim. Acta A 1991, 47, 1475–1485. [Google Scholar]
  15. Madsen, H.B. A preliminary note on the use of benzotriazole for stabilizing bronze objects. Stud. Conserv. 1967, 12, 163–167. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kokalj, A.; Peljhan, S.; Finsgar, M.; Milosev, I. What Determines the Inhibition Effectiveness of ATA, BTAH, and BTAOH Corrosion Inhibitors on Copper? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 16657–16668. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Kokalj, A. Ab initio modeling of the bonding of benzotriazole corrosion inhibitor to reduced and oxidized copper surfaces. Faraday Discuss. 2015, 180, 415–438. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Malow, M.; Wehrstedt, K.D.; Neuenfeld, S. On the explosive properties of 1H-benzotriazole and 1H-1,2,3-triazole. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 1233–1235. [Google Scholar]
  19. Srinivas, D.; Ghule, V.D.; Tewari, S.P.; Muralidharan, K. Synthesis of Amino, Azido, Nitro, and Nitrogen-Rich Azole-Substituted Derivatives of 1H-Benzotriazole for High-Energy Materials Applications. Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 15031–15037. [Google Scholar]
  20. Flippen-Anderson, J.L.; Gilardi, R.D.; Pitt, A.M.; Wilson, W.S. Synthesis and Explosive Properties of Benzotriazoles. Aust. J. Chem. 1992, 45, 513–524. [Google Scholar]
  21. Paterson, M.J.; Robb, M.A.; Blancafort, L.; DeBellis, A.D. Theoretical Study of Benzotriazole UV Photostability: Ultrafast Deactivation through Coupled Proton and Electron Transfer Triggered by a Charge-Transfer State. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 2912–2922. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lai, H.-J.; Ying, G.-G.; Ma, Y.-B.; Chen, Z.-F.; Chen, F.; Liu, Y.-S. Field dissipation and plant uptake of benzotriazole ultraviolet stabilizers in biosolid-amended soils. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 2014, 16, 558–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ding, J.; Yan, Z.; Feng, L.; Zhai, F.; Chen, X.; Xu, Y.; Tang, S.; Huang, C.; Li, L.; Pan, N.; et al. Benzotriazole decorated graphene oxide for efficient removal of U(VI). Environ. Pollut. 2019, 253, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Aromi, G.; Barrios, L.A.; Roubeau, O.; Gamez, P. Triazole and tetrazole. Prime ligands to generate remarkable coordination materials. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2011, 255, 485–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Loukopoulos, E.; Kostakis, G.E. Recent advances in the coordination chemistry of benzotriazole-based ligands. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2019, 395, 193–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Biswas, S.; Tonigold, M.; Volkmer, D. Homo- and Heteronuclear Coordination Compounds with Td Symmetry- the Solid State Structures of [MZn4(L)4(L’)6] (M = CoII or ZnII.; L = chloride or acac; L’ = 1,2,3-benzotriazolate). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2008, 634, 2532–2538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Biswas, S.; Tonigold, M.; Speldrich, M.; Kögerler, P.; Volkmer, D. Nonanuclear Coordination Compounds Featuring {M9L12}6+ Cores (M = NiII, CoII, or ZnII.; L = 1,2,3-Benzotriazolate). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 3094–3101.
  28. Biswas, S.; Tonigold, M.; Kelm, H.; Krüger, H.-J.; Volkmer, D. Thermal spin-crossover in the [M3Zn6Cl6L12] (M = Zn, FeII.; L = 5,6-dimethoxy-1,2,3-benzotriazolate) system: Structural, electrochemical, Mössbauer, and UV-Vis spectroscopic studies. Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 9851–9859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Biswas, S.; Tonigold, M.; Speldrich, M.; Kögerler, P.; Weill, M.; Volkmer, D. Syntheses and Magnetostructural Investigations on Kuratowski-Type Homo- and Heteropentanuclear Coordination Compounds [MZn4Cl4(L)6] (MII = Zn, Fe, Co, Ni, or Cu; L = 5,6-Dimethyl-1,2,3-benzotriazolate) Represented by the Nonplanar K3,3 Graph. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 7424–7434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xue, X.; Li, G.-T.; Peng, Y.-H.; Wu, L.; Wu, B.-L. Two photoluminescent pentanuclear homo- and hetero-metal complexes based on benzotriazole bridge. J. Coord. Chem. 2011, 64, 1593–1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, Y.-Y.; Grzywa, M.; Tonigold, M.; Sastre, G.; Schüttrigkeit, T.; Leeson, N.S.; Volkmer, D. Photophysical properties of Kuratowski-type coordination compounds [MIIZn4Cl4(Me2bta)6] (MII = Zn or Ru) featuring long-lived excited electronic states. Dalton Trans. 2011, 40, 5926–5938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Werner, T.W.; Reschke, S.; Bunzen, H.; Krug von Nidda, H.-A.; Deisenhofer, J.; Loidl, A.; Volkmer, D. [Co5Tp4*(Me2bta)6]: A Highly Symmetrical Pentanuclear Kuratowski Complex Featuring Tris(pyrazolyl)borate and Benzotriazolate Ligands. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 1053–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bunzen, H.; Grzywa, M.; Kalytta-Mewes, A.; Volkmer, D. One-pot synthesis of ultrastable pentanuclear alkylzinc complexes. Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 2613–2625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhou, G.-J.; Chen, W.-P.; Yu, Y.; Qin, L.; Han, T.; Zheng, Y.-Z. Filling the Missing Lings of M3n Prototype 3d-4f and 4f Cyclic Coordination Cages: Syntheses, Structures and Magnetic Properties of the Ni10Ln5 and the Er3n Wheels. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 12821–12829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tangoulis, V.; Raptopoulou, C.P.; Terzis, A.; Bakalbassis, E.G.; Diamantopoulou, E.; Perlepes, S.P. Polynuclear Nickel(II) Complexes: Preparation, Characterization, Magnetic Properties, and Quantum-Chemical Study of [Ni5(OH)(Rbta)5(acac)4(H2O)4] (R = Benzotriazole and 5,6-Dimethylbenzotriazole). Inorg. Chem. 1998, 37, 3142–3153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Müller-Buschbaum, K.; Mokaddem, Y. Rare Earth Benzotriazolates: Coordination Polymers Incorporating Decomposition Products from Ammonia to 1,2-Diaminobenzene in 1/∞ [Ln(Btz)3(BtzH)] (Ln = Ce, Pr), 1/∞ [Ln(Btz)3{Ph(NH2)2}] (Ln = Nd, Tb, Yb), and 1/∞ [Ho2(Btz)6(BtzH)(NH3)]. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 2000–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Müller-Buschbaum, K.; Mokaddem, Y. MOFs by Transformation of 1D-Coordination Polymers: From 1/∞ [Ln(Btz)3BtzH] to the Homoleptic Rare Earth 3D-Benzotriazolate Frameworks 3/∞ [Ln(Btz)3], Ln = La, Ce. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2008, 634, 2360–2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Biswas, S.; Grzywa, M.; Nayek, H.P.; Dehnen, S.; Senkovska, I.; Kaskel, S.; Volkmer, D. A cubic coordination framework constructed from benzobistriazolate ligands and zinc ions having selective gas sorption properties. Dalton Trans. 2009, 6487–6495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Xia, J.; Liu, B.-Y.; Wei, G.; Huang, X.-C. Solvent Induced Diverse Dimensional Coordination Assemblies of Cupric Benzotriazole-5-carboxylate: Syntheses, Crystal Structures, and Magnetic Properties. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 11032–11038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, Z.-H.; Xue, L.-P.; Zhao, B.-T.; Kan, J.; Su, W.-P. 2D lanthanide-organic frameworks constructed from lanthanide acetate skeletons and benzotriazole-5-carboxylic acid connectors: Synthesis, structure, luminescence and magnetic properties. Cryst. Eng. Commun. 2012, 14, 8485–8491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, Z.-H.; Hong, D.-F.; Xue, L.-P.; Fu, W.-J.; Zhao, B.-T. Two lanthanide-bound 1H-benzotriazole polymers: New potential metal-organic scaffold for solid-phase organic chemistry. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2013, 400, 239–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Schmieder, P.; Denysenko, D.; Grzywa, M.; Baumgärtner, B.; Senkovska, I.; Kaskel, S.; van Wüllen, L.; Volkmer, D. CFA-1: The first chiral metal-organic framework containing Kuratowski-type secondary building units. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 10786–10797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bunzen, H.; Grzywa, M.; Hambach, M.; Spirkl, S.; Volkmer, D. From Micro to Nano: A Toolbox for Tuning Crystal Size and Morphology of Benzotriazolate-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks. Cryst. Growth Des. 2016, 16, 3190–3197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, J.; Zhang, H.-B.; Tan, Y.-X.; Wang, F.; Kang, Y.; Zhang, J. Structural Diversity and Photoluminescent Properties of Zinc Benzotriazole-5-carboxylate Coordination Polymers. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53, 1500–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Xie, W.; Qin, J.-S.; He, W.-W.; Shao, K.-Z.; Su, Z.-M.; Du, D.-Y.; Li, S.-L.; Lan, Y.-Q. Encapsulation of an iridium complex in a metal–organic framework to give a composite with efficient white light emission. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2017, 4, 547–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Xie, W.; Ning, S.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, Z.; Zhang, S.; Tang, R. A 3D supramolecular network as highly selective and sensitive luminescent sensor for PO43- and Cu2+ ions in aqueous media. Dyes Pigm. 2018, 150, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, Q.-Y.; An, X.; Xu, L.; Yan, J.-H.; Zhang, S.; Xie, W.; Su, Z.-M. Syntheses, structure and properties of an especially stable Cd metal-organic framework driven by benzotriazole-5-carboxylic acid. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2020, 112, 107726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tangoulis, V.; Raptopoulou, C.P.; Psycharis, V.; Terzis, A.; Skorda, K.; Perlepes, S.P.; Cador, O.; Kahn, O.; Bakalbassis, E.G. Ferromagnetism in an Extended Three-Dimensional, Diamond-like Copper(II) Network: A New Copper(II)/1-hydroxybenzotriazolate Complex Exhibiting Solf-Magnet Properties and two Transitions at 6.4 and 4.4 K. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 2522–2529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dimitropoulos, A.; Stamou, C.; Perlepes, S.P.; Lada, Z.G.; Petsalakis, I.D.; Marinakis, S. A study of 1-methylbenzotriazole (MEBTA) using quantum mechanical calculations and vibrational, electronic, and nuclear magnetic resonances spectroscopies. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. Rev. 2023, in press. [Google Scholar]
  50. Plakatouras, J.C.; Perlepes, S.P.; Mentzafos, D.; Terzis, A.; Bakas, T.; Papaefthymiou, V. Coordination Chemistry of Corrosion Inhibitors of the Benzotriazole Type: Preparation and Characterization of Cobalt(II) Complexes with 1-methylbenzotriazole (Mebta) and the Crystal Structures of [CoCl2(Mebta)2], trans-[Co(NCS)2(Mebta)4], trans-[Co(NCS)2(MeOH)2(Mebta)2] and cis-[Co(NO3)2(Mebta)2]. Polyhedron 1992, 11, 2657–2672. [Google Scholar]
  51. Plakatouras, J.C.; Bakas, T.; Huffman, C.J.; Huffman, J.C.; Papaefthymiou, V.; Perlepes, S.P. Two Different Terminal Bonding Modes in [Fe2O(NO3)4(C7H7N3)4]. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1994, 2737–2738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Skorda, K.; Stamatatos, T.C.; Vafiadis, A.P.; Lithoxoidou, A.T.; Terzis, A.; Perlepes, S.P.; Mrozinski, J.; Raptopoulou, C.P.; Plakatouras, J.C.; Bakalbassis, E.G. Copper(II) chloride/1-methylbenzotriazole chemistry: Influence of various synthetic parameters on the product identity, structural and magnetic characterization, and quantum-chemical studies. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2005, 358, 565–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lazari, G.; Grammatikopoulos, S.; Perlepes, S.P.; Stamatatos, T.C. Combining benzotriazoles and azides in copper(II) chemistry: Synthesis, structural and spectroscopic characterization of a 1-D corrugated tape [Cu(N3)2(1-Mebta)]n coordination polymer (1-Mebta = 1-methylbenzotriazole). J. Coord. Chem. 2021, 74, 1823–1833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Jones, L.F.; O’Dea, L.; Offermann, D.A.; Jensen, P.; Moubaraki, B.; Murray, K.S. Benzotriazole based 1-D, 2-D and 3-D metal dicyanamide and tricyanomethanide coordination networks. Polyhedron 2006, 25, 360–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Li, X.; Xie, X.; Sun, N.; Liu, Y. Gold-Catalyzed Cadiot-Chodkiewicz-type Cross-Coupling of Terminal Alkynes with Alkynyl Hypervalent Iodine Reagents: Highly Selective Synthesis of Unsymmetrical 1,3-Diynes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 6994–6998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tsantis, S.T.; Bekiari, V.; Tzimopoulos, D.I.; Raptopoulou, C.P.; Psycharis, V.; Tsipis, A.; Perlepes, S.P. Reactivity of Coordinated 2-Pyridyl Oximes: Synthesis, Structure, Spectroscopic Characterization and Theoretical Studies of Dichlorodi{(2-Pyridyl)Furoxane}Zinc(II) Obtained from the Reaction between Zinc(II) Nitrate and Pyridine-2-Chloroxime. Inorganics 2020, 8, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Geary, W.J. The use of conductivity measurements in organic solvents for the characterization of coordination compounds. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1971, 7, 81–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Katritzky, A.R.; Kuzmierkiewicz, W.; Greenhill, I.V. An improved method for the N-alkylation of benzotriazole and 1,2,4-triazole. Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 1991, 110, 369–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rondeau, R.E.; Rosenberg, H.M.; Dunbar, D.J. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Analysis of 1- and 2-Methylbenzotriazole. J. Mol. Spectr. 1969, 29, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Begtrup, M.; Elguero, J.; Faure, R.; Camos, P.; Estopá, C.; Ilavsky, D.; Fruchier, A.; Marzin, C.; de Mendoza, J. Effect of N-Substituents on the 13C NMR Parameters of Azoles. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1988, 26, 134–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Nakamoto, K. Infrared and Raman Spectra of Inorganic and Coordination Compounds, 4th ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1986; pp. 130–141+147–156+254–257+324–331+464. [Google Scholar]
  62. Kleywegt, G.J.; Wiesmeijer, W.G.R.; Van Driel, G.; Driessen, W.L.; Reedijk, J.; Noordik, J.H. Unidentate versus symmetrically and unsymmetrically bidentate nitrate co-ordination in pyrazole–containing chelates. The crystal and molecular structures of (nitrato-O)[tris(3,5-dimethylpyrazol-1-ylmethyl)amine]copper(II) nitrate, (nitrato-O,O’)[tris(3,5- dimethylpyrazol-1-ylmethyl)amine]nickel(II) nitrate, and (nitrato-O)(nitrato-O,O’)[tris(3,5- dimethylpyrazol-1-ylmethyl)amine]cadmium(II). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1985, 2177–2184. [Google Scholar]
  63. Kitos, A.A.; Efthymiou, C.G.; Manos, M.J.; Tasiopoulos, A.J.; Nastopoulos, V.; Escuer, A.; Perlepes, S.P. Interesting copper(II)-assisted transformations of 2-acetylpyridine and 2-benzoylpyridine. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 1063–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Fukui, K.; Fujimoto, H. A theoretical account for stereoselective e2 reactions. Tetrahedron Lett. 1965, 4303–4307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Reed, A.E.; Curtiss, L.A.; Weinhold, F. Intermolecular Interactions from a Natural Bond Orbital. Chem. Rev. 1988, 88, 899–926. [Google Scholar]
  66. Weinhold, F. Natural Bond Orbital Methods. In The Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry; Schleyer, P.v.R., Allinger, N.L., Clark, T., Casteiger, J., Kollman, P.A., Schaefer, H.F., III, Schreiner, P.R., Eds.; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 1998; p. 1792. [Google Scholar]
  67. Glendening, E.D.; Bandenhoop, J.K.; Reed, A.E.; Carpenter, J.E.; Bohmann, J.A.; Morales, C.M.; Weinhold, F. NBO 5.0; Theoretical Chemistry Institute, University of Wisconsin: Madison, WI, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  68. CrystalClear; Rigaku: The Woodlands, TX, USA; MSC Inc.: Melville, NY, USA, 2005.
  69. Sheldrick, G.M. A short history of SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 2008, 64, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Crystal Impact. Diamond, Crystal and Molecular Structure Visualization; Version 3.1; Crystal Impact: Bonn, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  72. Head-Gordon, M.; Pople, J.A.; Frisch, M.J. MP2 Energy Evaluation by Direct Methods. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1988, 153, 503–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Saebo, S.; Almlof, J. Avoiding the integral storage bottleneck in LCAO calculations of electron correlation. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1989, 154, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Frisch, M.J.; Head-Gordon, M.; Pople, J.A. A direct MP2 gradient method. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1990, 166, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Frisch, M.J.; Head-Gordon, M.; Pople, J.A. Semi-direct algorithms for the MP2 energy and gradient. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1990, 166, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Head-Gordon, M.; Head-Gordon, T. Analytic MP2 frequencies without fifth-order storage. Theory and application to bifurcated hydrogen bonds in the water hexamer. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1994, 220, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Tomasi, J.; Mennucci, B.; Cammi, R. Quantum mechanical continuum solvation models. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 2994–3094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Grimme, S. Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction. J. Comput. Chem. 2006, 27, 1787–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Becke, D. Density-functional thermochemistry. V. Systematic optimization of exchange-correlation functionals. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 8554–8560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Chai, D.; Head-Gordon, M. Long-range corrected hybrid density functionals with damped atom-atom dispersion corrections. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 6615–6620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Wu, Q.; Yang, W.T. Empirical correction to density functional theory for van der Waals interactions. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 116, 515–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Minenkov, Y.; Singstad, A.; Occhipinti, O.; Jensen, V. The accuracy of DFT-optimized geometries of functional transition metal compounds: A validation study of catalysts for olefin metathesis and other reactions in the homogeneous phase. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 5526–5541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Petersson, G.A.; et al. Gaussian 09; Revision B.01; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  84. Weigend, F.; Ahlirchs, R. Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: Design and assessment of accuracy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7, 3297–3305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Schäfer, A.; Horn, H.; Ahlrichs, R. Fully optimized contracted Gaussian basis sets for atoms Li to Kr. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97, 2571–2577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Schäfer, A.; Huber, C.; Ahlrichs, R. Fully optimized contracted Gaussian basis sets of triple zeta valence quality for atoms Li to Kr. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 5829–5835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Eichkorn, K.; Weigend, F.; Treutler, O.; Ahlrichs, R. Auxiliary basis sets for main row atoms and transition metals and their use to approximate Coulomb potentials. Theor. Chem. Acc. 1997, 97, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Weigend, F.; Furche, F.; Ahlrichs, R. Gaussian basis sets of quadruple zeta valence quality for atoms H–Kr. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 119, 12753–12762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Inorganics 11 00356 g001
Figure 1. (Left) The general structural formula of BtaH and its derivatives; (right) 1-methylbenzotriazole (Mebta), the ligand used in this work.
Figure 1. (Left) The general structural formula of BtaH and its derivatives; (right) 1-methylbenzotriazole (Mebta), the ligand used in this work.
Inorganics 11 00356 g001
Inorganics 11 00356 g002
Figure 2. Labeled plot of the molecular structure of [ZnBr2(Mebta)2] (3). Thermal ellipsoids are presented at the 50% probability level.
Figure 2. Labeled plot of the molecular structure of [ZnBr2(Mebta)2] (3). Thermal ellipsoids are presented at the 50% probability level.
Inorganics 11 00356 g002
Inorganics 11 00356 g003
Figure 3. Labeled plot of the molecular structure of [ZnI2(Mebta)2] (4). Thermal ellipsoids are presented at the 50% probability level.
Figure 3. Labeled plot of the molecular structure of [ZnI2(Mebta)2] (4). Thermal ellipsoids are presented at the 50% probability level.
Inorganics 11 00356 g003
Inorganics 11 00356 g004
Figure 4. (a) Chains of [ZnI2(Mebta)2] molecules parallel to the a axis in the crystal structure of 4. (b) Side view along the a axis. Light green and cyan dashed lines illustrate π–π stacking interactions. Orange dashed lines denote C10-HB(C10)∙∙∙I1 H bonds. See text for details.
Figure 4. (a) Chains of [ZnI2(Mebta)2] molecules parallel to the a axis in the crystal structure of 4. (b) Side view along the a axis. Light green and cyan dashed lines illustrate π–π stacking interactions. Orange dashed lines denote C10-HB(C10)∙∙∙I1 H bonds. See text for details.
Inorganics 11 00356 g004
Inorganics 11 00356 g005
Figure 5. Labeled plot of the molecular structure of tet-[Zn(NO3)2(Mebta)2] (5). The gray dashed lines denote very long Zn∙∙∙O interactions. Thermal ellipsoids are presented at the 50% probability level.
Figure 5. Labeled plot of the molecular structure of tet-[Zn(NO3)2(Mebta)2] (5). The gray dashed lines denote very long Zn∙∙∙O interactions. Thermal ellipsoids are presented at the 50% probability level.
Inorganics 11 00356 g005
Inorganics 11 00356 g006
Figure 6. Labeled plot of the molecular structure of oct-[Zn(NO3)2(Mebta)2] (6). Thermal ellipsoids are presented at the 50% probability level. Primed atoms are generated by the symmetry operation –x, y, −z + 1/2.
Figure 6. Labeled plot of the molecular structure of oct-[Zn(NO3)2(Mebta)2] (6). Thermal ellipsoids are presented at the 50% probability level. Primed atoms are generated by the symmetry operation –x, y, −z + 1/2.
Inorganics 11 00356 g006
Inorganics 11 00356 g007
Figure 7. Labeled plot of the molecular structure of the cation that is present in complex [Zn(Mebta)4](ClO4)2 (7). Thermal ellipsoids are presented at the 50% probability level.
Figure 7. Labeled plot of the molecular structure of the cation that is present in complex [Zn(Mebta)4](ClO4)2 (7). Thermal ellipsoids are presented at the 50% probability level.
Inorganics 11 00356 g007
Inorganics 11 00356 g008
Figure 8. Layers of the [Zn(Mebta)4]2+ cations of 7 parallel to the (−101) crystallographic plane. Perchlorate anions are also shown, those with light colors lying above the layer and those with darker color lying below the layer. Violet, light green, and cyan dashed lines denote π–π interactions.
Figure 8. Layers of the [Zn(Mebta)4]2+ cations of 7 parallel to the (−101) crystallographic plane. Perchlorate anions are also shown, those with light colors lying above the layer and those with darker color lying below the layer. Violet, light green, and cyan dashed lines denote π–π interactions.
Inorganics 11 00356 g008
Inorganics 11 00356 g009
Figure 9. The FT far-IR spectrum (polyethylene, cm₋1) of [ZnCl2(Mebta)2] (1).
Figure 9. The FT far-IR spectrum (polyethylene, cm₋1) of [ZnCl2(Mebta)2] (1).
Inorganics 11 00356 g009
Inorganics 11 00356 g010
Figure 10. The FT far-IR spectrum (polyethylene, cm₋1) of [ZnBr2(Mebta)2] (3).
Figure 10. The FT far-IR spectrum (polyethylene, cm₋1) of [ZnBr2(Mebta)2] (3).
Inorganics 11 00356 g010
Inorganics 11 00356 g011
Figure 11. MP2/6-31+G* calculated FMOs of Mebta in EtOH.
Figure 11. MP2/6-31+G* calculated FMOs of Mebta in EtOH.
Inorganics 11 00356 g011
Table 1. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°) for complexes [ZnBr2(Mebta)2] (3) and [ZnI2(Mebta)2] (4).
Table 1. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°) for complexes [ZnBr2(Mebta)2] (3) and [ZnI2(Mebta)2] (4).
Bond Lengths (Å) and
Angles (°) a		34
Zn-X12.367(1)2.554(1)
Zn-X22.353(7)2.567(1)
Zn-N32.034(3)2.050(4)
Zn-N132.070(4)2.042(4)
N1-N21.335(4)1.334(6)
N2-N31.321(4)1.315(7)
N11-N121.329(5)1.333(7)
N12-N131.323(4)1.321(7)
C9-N11.362(5)1.362(8)
C8-N31.384(5)1.367(7)
C10-N11.466(5)1.461(7)
X1-Zn-X2116.4(3)115.4(1)
X1-Zn-N3108.9(1)112.3(1)
X1-Zn-N13104.6(1)108.0(1)
X2-Zn-N3114.4(1)104.0(1)
X2-Zn-N13107.2(1)110.2(1)
N3-Zn-N13104.2(1)106.7(2)
N1-N2-N3107.9(3)107.6(4)
a X = Br, I.
Table 2. Selected interatomic distances (Å) and interatomic angles (°) for complexes tet-[Zn(NO3)2(Mebta)2] (5) and oct-[Zn(NO3)2(Mebta)2] (6).
Table 2. Selected interatomic distances (Å) and interatomic angles (°) for complexes tet-[Zn(NO3)2(Mebta)2] (5) and oct-[Zn(NO3)2(Mebta)2] (6).
Complex 5
Distances (Å) Angles (°)
Zn-O12.016(2)O1-Zn-O487.9(1)
Zn∙∙∙O22.588(5)O1-Zn-N3115.7(1)
Zn-O41.992(2)O1-Zn-N13108.3(1)
Zn∙∙∙O62.722(6)O4-Zn-N3117.4(1)
Zn-N31.996(2)O4-Zn-N13105.0(1)
Zn-N131.995(2)N3-Zn-N13118.2(1)
N4-O11.290(3)O2∙∙∙Zn-O153.8(1)
N4-O21.228(3)O2∙∙∙Zn-O4141.0(1)
N4-O31.214(3)O2∙∙∙Zn-N388.9(1)
N5-O41.291(3)O2∙∙∙Zn-N1383.9(1)
N5-O51.214(3)O2∙∙∙Zn∙∙∙O6164.3(1)
N5-O61.229(3)O6∙∙∙Zn-O1139.5(1)
N1-N21.336(3)O6∙∙∙Zn-O451.7(1)
N2-N31.319(3)O6∙∙∙Zn-N389.9(1)
N11-N121.332(3)O6∙∙∙Zn-N1382.8(1)
N12-N131.313(3)
Complex 6
Distances (Å) Angles (°) a
Zn-N32.040(2)N3-Zn-O1105.9(1)
Zn-O12.061(2)N3-Zn-O1′97.6(1)
Zn-O22.388(2)N3-Zn-O292.5(1)
N1-N21.325(3)N3-Zn-O2′153.7(1)
N2-N31.323(3)N3-Zn-N3′101.7(1)
N4-O11.275(3)O1-Zn-O1′142.5(1)
N4-O21.244(3)O1-Zn-O256.9(1)
N4-O31.220(3)O1-Zn-O2′93.9(1)
O2-Zn-O2′84.0(1)
a Primed atoms are generated by the symmetry operation –x, y, −z + 1/2.
Table 3. Selected bond distances (Å) and bond angles (°) for the cation of complex [Zn(Mebta)4](ClO4)2 (7).
Table 3. Selected bond distances (Å) and bond angles (°) for the cation of complex [Zn(Mebta)4](ClO4)2 (7).
Bond Lengths (Å) Bond Angles (°)
Zn-N31.990(2)N3-Zn-N13111.0(1)
Zn-N131.987(2)N3-Zn-N23109.8(1)
Zn-N231.981(2)N3-Zn-N33108.6(1)
Zn-N332.007(2)N13-Zn-N23110.3(1)
N1-N21.325(3)N13-Zn-N33108.0(1)
N2-N31.320(3)N23-Zn-N33109.1(1)
Table 4. Selected diagnostic vibrational spectral data for Mebta and complexes 1-8 a.
Table 4. Selected diagnostic vibrational spectral data for Mebta and complexes 1-8 a.
Compoundνas(NNN)νs(NNN)νas(ZnX)tνs(ZnX)tν(ZnO)t
Mebta1197s1110m
(1180w)(1105s)
11218s1136m324s300s
(1226m)(1140s)(325m)(300s)
21222s1138m
bb
31218s1135m243s c219s
(1224m)(1140s)(246m c)(220s)
41219s1132m208s189s
(1233w, 1224m)(1136s)(208m)(182s)
51220s1139m348s300m
bbbb
61220s1137m 326w, 292sh, 274s d, 255sh
(1228m)(1141m) (326m, 270s d, 260m)
71218m1144s
bb
81226m1170w
bb
a The corresponding Raman peaks are written within parentheses. b No Raman spectra available. c Most probably overlapping vibration with νs(ZnN) [Table 5]. d Most probably overlapping vibration with ν(ZnN) [Table 5]. Abbreviations: s = strong, m = medium, w = weak, sh = shoulder, X = Cl, Br, I, ONO2 (monodentate).
Table 5. Selected diagnostic vibrational spectral data for complexes 1–8 concerning mainly zinc(II)-nitrogen stretching vibrations a.
Table 5. Selected diagnostic vibrational spectral data for complexes 1–8 concerning mainly zinc(II)-nitrogen stretching vibrations a.
Compoundν(ZnCl)t(T2)/
ν(ZnN)(T2)		νas(ZnN)νs(ZnN)ν(ZnN)
Mebta
1 274m247m
(270m)(249s)
2293s
b
3 275s243s c
(271m)(246m c)
4 263m248m
(263m)(246m)
5 291s248m
bb
6 263m274s d, 242m
b(270s d, 248m)
7288s
b
8287s
b
a The corresponding Raman peaks are written within parentheses. b No Raman spectra available. c Most probably overlapping vibration with νas(ZnX)t [Table 4]. d Most probably overlapping vibration with ν(ZnO)t [Table 4]. Abbreviations: s = strong, m = medium, w = weak, sh = shoulder.
Table 6. Mulliken population analysis (BSII) atom by atom data and Wiberg bond indices (BSII) for the coordination bonds a of the nitrato complexes 5 and 6.
Table 6. Mulliken population analysis (BSII) atom by atom data and Wiberg bond indices (BSII) for the coordination bonds a of the nitrato complexes 5 and 6.
ComplexZn-Donor AtomBond Length (Å)Mulliken Pop AnalWiberg Bond Indices
5Zn-N32.040.22330.2705
Zn-N132.060.18710.2588
Zn-O11.990.20650.2794
Zn-O42.000.17700.2663
Zn-O22.510.07230.1021
Zn-O62.660.05040.0723
6Zn-N32.150.15680.2261
Zn-N3′2.150.15680.2261
Zn-O12.080.15350.2250
Zn-O1′2.080.15350.2250
Zn-O22.190.13360.1911
Zn-O2′2.190.13360.1911
a The bond lengths are the theoretical values; the atom numbering scheme corresponds to the experimental one (Figure 5 and Figure 6).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Stamou, C.; Barouni, E.; Plakatouras, J.C.; Sigalas, M.M.; Raptopoulou, C.P.; Psycharis, V.; Bakalbassis, E.G.; Perlepes, S.P. The “Periodic Table” of 1-methylbenzotriazole: Zinc(II) Complexes. Inorganics 2023, 11, 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11090356

AMA Style

Stamou C, Barouni E, Plakatouras JC, Sigalas MM, Raptopoulou CP, Psycharis V, Bakalbassis EG, Perlepes SP. The “Periodic Table” of 1-methylbenzotriazole: Zinc(II) Complexes. Inorganics. 2023; 11(9):356. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11090356

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stamou, Christina, Eleftheria Barouni, John C. Plakatouras, Michael M. Sigalas, Catherine P. Raptopoulou, Vassilis Psycharis, Evangelos G. Bakalbassis, and Spyros P. Perlepes. 2023. "The “Periodic Table” of 1-methylbenzotriazole: Zinc(II) Complexes" Inorganics 11, no. 9: 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11090356

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop