Next Article in Journal
A Complementary Approach for Characterizing Dark Count Rate in First-Photon-Gated Single-Photon Detectors
Previous Article in Journal
Luminescence Efficiency of Tm3+-Doped Crystals at 2.0 μm Under 793 nm Excitation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Comparative Analysis of Relative Intensity Noise in DBR Single-Frequency Fiber Lasers with Different Output Power

1
Laser Fusion Research Center, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621900, China
2
Graduate School, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Beijing 100088, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Photonics 2026, 13(5), 467; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics13050467
Submission received: 8 April 2026 / Revised: 3 May 2026 / Accepted: 7 May 2026 / Published: 9 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Lasers, Light Sources and Sensors)

Abstract

Single-frequency fiber lasers (SFFLs) are essential for applications such as gravitational wave detection, high-precision spectroscopy, and inertial confinement fusion, requiring narrow linewidth, low noise, and high output power. Here, we present a comparative study of 1 μm waveband distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) SFFLs with varying cavity parameters. Numerically, we investigate the effects of key cavity parameters on laser performance by plotting contour maps of output power versus grating reflectivity and lasing wavelength. We also simulate intensity noise transfer functions from pump fluctuations. Increasing pump power shifts the relaxation oscillation peak to higher frequency and reduces its amplitude, which originates from the higher intracavity photon density that speeds up the damping of perturbations. Experimentally, we construct two lasers using 6.5 mm and 10.5 mm YDFs spliced between FBG pairs. These lasers employ low-reflectivity FBGs centered at 1053 nm and 1064 nm, with reflectivities of 74% and 55%, respectively. The corresponding maximum output powers are 29.7 mW and 197 mW. The 1053 nm SFFL exhibits a relative intensity noise (RIN) of −102 dBc/Hz at 2.07 MHz, a linewidth of 12.52 kHz, and a mode-hop-free tuning range of 0.64 nm. Although increasing the pump power suppresses the relaxation oscillation peak, it broadens the linewidth due to laser phase noise degradation caused by pump noise-induced temperature fluctuations in the gain fiber. For SFFLs, the output powers should be selected according to the specific application, as a higher output power inherently leads to a broader linewidth. These insights are essential for optimizing such lasers and underscore their strong potential for future applications.
Keywords: distributed Bragg reflector cavity; single-frequency fiber lasers; relative intensity noise distributed Bragg reflector cavity; single-frequency fiber lasers; relative intensity noise

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Xia, H.; Yao, Z.; Tian, X.; Zheng, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, R. Comparative Analysis of Relative Intensity Noise in DBR Single-Frequency Fiber Lasers with Different Output Power. Photonics 2026, 13, 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics13050467

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Xia H, Yao Z, Tian X, Zheng J, Li J, Zhang F, Zhang R. Comparative Analysis of Relative Intensity Noise in DBR Single-Frequency Fiber Lasers with Different Output Power. Photonics. 2026; 13(5):467. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics13050467

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yaohui, Handing Xia, Zefeng Yao, Xiaocheng Tian, Junwen Zheng, Jianbin Li, Fan Zhang, and Rui Zhang. 2026. "Comparative Analysis of Relative Intensity Noise in DBR Single-Frequency Fiber Lasers with Different Output Power" Photonics 13, no. 5: 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics13050467

APA Style

Zhang, Y., Xia, H., Yao, Z., Tian, X., Zheng, J., Li, J., Zhang, F., & Zhang, R. (2026). Comparative Analysis of Relative Intensity Noise in DBR Single-Frequency Fiber Lasers with Different Output Power. Photonics, 13(5), 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics13050467

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop