Next Article in Journal
Efficient Generation of Transversely and Longitudinally Truncated Chirped Gaussian Laser Pulses for Application in High-Brightness Photoinjectors
Previous Article in Journal
Machine Learning Applied to Optical Communication Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Generation of Tunable Coherent Tri-Frequency Microwave Signals Based on Optoelectronic Oscillator
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Compact Optical 90° Hybrid on a Thin-Film Lithium Niobate Platform Used for Integrated Coherent Transceivers

1
Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100083, China
2
College of Materials Science and Opto-Electronic Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Photonics 2025, 12(5), 459; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12050459
Submission received: 3 April 2025 / Revised: 30 April 2025 / Accepted: 7 May 2025 / Published: 9 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microwave Photonics: Science and Applications)

Abstract

A 90° optical hybrid employing an MMI coupler was fabricated on a thin-film lithium niobate (TFLN) platform that can be used for integrated coherent transceivers. The fabricated 90° optical hybrid exhibited a CMRR greater than 20 dB, a phase error below ±7.5°, and an excess loss less than 1.8 dB (including contributions from the 90° hybrid, a 1 × 2 MMI coupler, and an optical delay line, after subtracting the losses from the coupler and delay line, the 90° optical hybrid introduced less than 0.9 dB of loss) over the C-band with a compact footprint of 13.8 × 250 μm2, facilitating the future development of high-bandwidth optical coherent transceivers heterogeneously integrated on TFLN.

1. Introduction

The capacity demand in communication networks has grown exponentially, driven by the proliferation of emerging technological advancements, including the Internet of Things, massive machine-type communications, and artificial intelligence [1,2]. Coherent optical communication technology is widely deployed across critical infrastructure domains, including data center interconnects, metro area networks, and bone networks [3]. Coherent optical communication technology enables the encoding of information across multiple physical dimensions of light, such as polarization (PDM [4], DP-DQPSK [5]) and phase (high-order constellation modulation [6,7]), which can significantly enhance data transmission rates. The 90° optical hybrid is a core component in coherent optical communication systems, where it combines the incoming coherent modulated optical signal with the local oscillator signal to enable balanced detection and IQ demodulation [8]. The common-mode rejection ratio (CMRR) and phase error represent the two most critical performance metrics for evaluating 90° optical hybrids, as they directly impact the bit error rate (BER) of coherent receivers in optical communication systems.
Waveguide-based 90° optical hybrids have become the focus of extensive research owing to their advantageous characteristics, including their compact size and compatibility with photonic integrated circuit (PIC) technology. A 90° optical hybrid coupler based on an MMI coupler, composed of single-mode input/output waveguides and a slab multimode waveguide, demonstrates superior characteristics, including structural simplicity, a broad operational bandwidth, and minimal insertion losses. Reports have shown the successful implementation of 90° optical hybrids on different integrated platforms, including plasmons [9], indium phosphate [10], silicon-on-insulator [11], silicon nitride [12], and so on. Recently, thin-film lithium niobate (TFLN) has attracted significant research attention due to its advantageous properties, including its large refractive index contrast, wide transparency window, and high nonlinear efficiency, gradually emerging as a promising integrated photonic platform [13,14]. So far, 90° optical hybrids have been successfully demonstrated on the TFLN platform, including a design based on a 4 × 4 MMI coupler [15] and a wedge-shaped configuration utilizing tapered 2 × 4 and 2 × 2 multimode interference (MMI) couplers [16]. Nevertheless, the former design suffers from a relatively large chip area, necessitating further size reduction, whereas the latter introduces structural complexity that increases fabrication difficulties.
In this work, a 90° optical hybrid with an MMI coupler on x-cut TFLN was designed and tested. It was fabricated on a 600 nm thick x-cut TFLN substrate with a partial etch depth of 300 nm. The fabricated 90° optical hybrid exhibited a CMRR larger than 20 dB, a phase error below ±7.5°, and an excess loss less than 1.8 dB (including contributions from the 90° hybrid, the 1 × 2 MMI coupler, and the optical delay line, after subtracting the losses from the coupler and delay line, the 90° optical hybrid introduced less than 0.9 dB of loss) over the C-band with a compact footprint of 13.8 × 250 μm2, demonstrating outstanding performance with an ultra-compact size and a simple design.

2. Device Design

As depicted in Figure 1, the proposed 90° optical hybrid, based on an MMI coupler, was fabricated on a 600 nm thick x-cut TFLN substrate with the following partial etch depth: he = 300 nm. The modulated signal and the local oscillator light (LO) were simultaneously injected into input ports 1 and 3 of the 90° optical hybrid. The electric fields at the four output ports (O1O4) after interference within the MMI coupler are represented below [17]:
E o u t , 1 ( t ) E o u t , 2 ( t ) E o u t , 3 ( t ) E o u t , 4 ( t ) = 1 2 e j φ s , 1 e j φ L O , 1 e j φ s , 2 e j φ L O , 2 e j φ s , 3 e j φ L O , 3 e j φ s , 4 e j φ L O , 4 E S ( t ) E L O ( t )
where ES and ELO are two input complex fields of the signal and LO, and φs,i and φLO,i (i = 1, 2, 3, 4) represent the phase shift from input ports 1 or 3 (corresponding to the launched signal or LO light, respectively) to the output ports. Then, the relative phase differences of the four output channels can be represented as follows: ∆φs,i =φs,iφLO,i. The output electric fields Eout,1 and Eout,4 correspond to the in-phase (I) signal, and Eout,2 and Eout,3 correspond to the quadrature (Q) signal. Generally, two pairs of balanced detectors are connected to the in-phase (I) signal and quadrature (Q) signal to detect the phase in a QPSK system.
Here, we briefly explain the basic theory related to self-imaging in the MMI region [18]. Basically, in order to ensure the proper operation of the 90° optical hybrid, the beat length Lπ should satisfy the following condition
L π = π β 0 β 1
where β0 and β1 denote the propagation constant of the fundamental mode and the first-order mode, respectively. Because of the strong lateral confinement provided by the ridge waveguide structure, the optical field is tightly confined, and Lπ can be approximated as follows:
L π 4 n r W e 3 λ 0
where nr and λ0 indicate the refractive index and wavelength, respectively. We stands for the effective MMI width. The theoretical length of the MMI coupler (LMMI) is defined by the following equation:
L M M I = 3 4 L π n r W M M I λ 0
Based on Equation (4), we can ascertain that the length of the MMI coupler (LMMI) is related to WMMI and nr. To ensure high-quality imaging, the MMI must demonstrate low phase errors for the higher-order modes. Additionally, sufficient space between the input and output ports is necessary to minimize mutual crosstalk. By comprehensively considering factors such as loss, phase error, and size, we set the width of the MMI to WMMI = 13.8 µm, with a corresponding length of LMMI = 250 µm. The widths of the input and output ports were optimized to We = 2.5 µm based on the method described in [19] and linearly tapered to Ws = 1 µm using adiabatic tapers with a length of 25 µm to minimize mode mismatch losses at the junctions. Owing to the sufficient separation between the ports, crosstalk at the output ports was found to be negligible.
The electrical field distributions of the MMI coupler at 1550 nm were calculated using the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method, with TE-mode light being incident from I1 and I3, respectively, as shown in Figure 2a,b. From the profiles, the four output optical fields demonstrate equal intensity levels. Figure 2c–f show the electrical field distributions under different initial phase conditions for two input fields, i.e., (0, −π/4), (0, π/4), (0, −3π/4), and (0, 3π/4), proving that this design can effectively function as a 90° optical hybrid. To further evaluate the performance of the 90° optical hybrid, the wavelength dependence of the excess loss, phase errors, and CMRRs were analyzed using 3D FDTD simulations over a broad spectral range from 1530 nm to 1565 nm. In Figure 2g, the excess loss is below 0.6 dB across the wavelength span of 1530 to 1565 nm. Phase error serves as a critical performance metric in a 90° optical hybrid, directly impacting the reliability of balanced detection. As shown in Figure 2h, the output phase deviations remain within ±5° across the wavelength range of 1530 nm to 1565 nm. Additionally, the common mode rejection ratios (CMRR) represent the output power balance of the I/Q channel [20]. In Figure 2i, the CMRRs exceed 20 dB across the entire C-band, indicating a good power balance between the in-phase and quadrature channels.
The impact of MMI fabrication tolerances on the performance of the proposed 90° optical hybrid was investigated. As shown in Figure 3a–f, the performance metrics were as follows: excess loss < 0.6 dB, phase error < 5°, and CMRR > 20 dB over a wavelength range from 1535 to 1565 nm when WMMI in 13.8 µm ± 0.1 µm. Furthermore, the performance of the MMI with different lengths was also investigated. An excess loss < 0.8 dB, a phase error < 5°, and a CMRR > 20 dB across the whole C-band could still be achieved despite a fabrication length deviation of ∆L = ±1 µm, as shown in Figure 3g–l. These results confirm that the proposed 90° optical hybrid exhibits excellent tolerance to fabrication variations.

3. Experimental Results

The proposed 90° optical hybrid was fabricated on an x-cut TFLN wafer. A high-quality LN substrate was subjected to high-dose He+ (or H+) ion implantation to define a cleavage plane at the target film thickness. Meanwhile, a handle wafer—typically LN or silicon with an oxide layer—was prepared. After bonding the LN substrate to the handle wafer, thermal annealing was used to initiate layer splitting along the cleavage plane, resulting in the formation of the thin film [13]. The TFLN consists of a 600 nm thick top LN layer, a 4.7 μm thick silicon dioxide (SiO2) layer, and a 500 μm thick silicon substrate. The structure was defined utilizing an electron beam lithography (EBL) system, followed by the etching of a 300 nm thick lithium niobate (LN) layer through inductively coupled plasma reactive ion etching (ICP-RIE) technology. Then, a 1000 nm thick silicon dioxide (SiO2) upper cladding layer was deposited via plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD), followed by wafer dicing and precision mechanical polishing to complete the chip-manufacturing process. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) characterization verified that the fabricated device had dimensions of 13.82 × 250.5 μm2. In the previous Section, we conducted simulation analyses on the fabrication tolerances of the chip dimensions, and the results indicated that the device maintained good performance within a width variation of ±0.1 µm and a length variation of ±1 µm. Dimensional measurements of the fabricated chip confirmed that its actual size fell within these specified tolerance ranges. The fabricated structures of the 90° optical hybrid and the 1 × 2 MMI coupler, as observed using microscopy, are shown in Figure 4.
Figure 5 is a schematic of the experimental setup, including the optical hybrid device under testing (DUT) and associated characterization instrumentation. The experimental setup includes a tunable laser source (Santec TSL-550, Santec Holdings Corporation, Komaki, Aichi Prefecture, Japan), a polarization state generation device (Santec PCU-100, Santec Holdings Corporation, Komaki, Aichi Prefecture, Japan), an optical power meter (Santec MPM-210H, Santec Holdings Corporation, Komaki, Aichi Prefecture, Japan), and a lensed fiber with a 3 µm spot size. The tunable laser source operates within a wavelength range of 1520–1580 nm. The device employs end-face coupling as its optical interfacing scheme. The lensed fibers were precisely aligned with the input and output waveguide by using an optical coupling platform. A computer-controlled synchronous scanning system, integrating a tunable laser source, a polarization state generation device, and an optical power meter, enabled automated acquisition of the transmission spectra of the device under testing (DUT) through an optical power meter. The output light from the tunable laser source was coupled with the polarization state generator (Santec PCU-100) via an optical fiber. This device is capable of generating various polarization states on the Poincare sphere, including TE polarization states, TM polarization states, and right-hand circular (RCP) and left-hand circular (LCP) polarization states, relative to the axis defined by an internal linear polarizer. Therefore, the transmission spectra under multiple polarization states can be obtained using an optical power meter. Since the fabricated device operates in a TE polarization state, the required test data can be acquired by selecting the transmission spectrum under the TE polarization state in the control software.
Figure 6a shows the transmission spectra of each port over a wavelength range of 1530–1565 nm. A neighboring straight waveguide with the same width (1 µm) served as a reference waveguide. First, at each fixed wavelength, the output power (in mW) of each output port was extracted from the transmission spectra and summed. The total power was then converted into dBm. Then, at the same wavelength, the excess loss of the chip was obtained by subtracting the sum of the output values from the four ports of the 90° optical hybrid from the output value of the reference waveguide. Figure 6b shows that the excess loss, including contributions from the 90° hybrid, the 1 × 2 MMI coupler, and the optical delay line, remained below 1.8 dB across the C-band. The measured waveguide loss for this setup was 0.8 dB/cm. After the losses were subtracted from the input/output long waveguides, the optical delay line, and the 1 × 2 MMI coupler, the excess loss of the 90°optical hybrid was found to be less than 0.9 dB.
To verify the phase characteristics of the 90° optical hybrid, a Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI) was fabricated, consisting of a cascaded 1 × 2 MMI coupler and an optical delay line, as shown in Figure 4a. Owing to the wavelength-dependent phase shifts introduced by the delay line, the phase information at the output ports of the 90° optical hybrid could be converted into intensity variations for detection.
The laser input was evenly split into two arms via the 1 × 2 MMI coupler. Upon passing through the delay line and reaching input Ports 1 and 3, the two beams developed a constant phase difference. By varying the incident wavelength, one can tune this phase difference accordingly. Consequently, the phase shift can be determined through spectral analysis of output power variations at all four ports as a function of the incident wavelength, as expressed by the following formula: Δϕ1,j = 2πΔλ1,j/FSR. The spectral minimum wavelength separation (Δλ1,j) between output ports j and 1 correlates with their corresponding phase deviation Δϕ1,j. The free spectral range (FSR) is defined as the wavelength spacing between adjacent spectral minima in the transmission spectrum of Channel 1. Computational analysis revealed that the phase error of the device was less than ±7.5°, as shown in Figure 6c. The CMRR for both in-phase (I: P1/P4) and quadrature (Q: P2/P3) channel pairs was calculated using the following formula: −20 log [(PiPj)/(Pi + Pj)], where Pi,j denotes optical power measured at output ports i and j, respectively. The CMRR characterization of the fabricated 90° hybrid’s in-phase (I) and quadrature (Q) channels was carried out using the spectral peak of the output ports. As shown in Figure 6d, the CMRR of the I/Q channels exceeded 20 dB across the entire C-band.

4. Discussion

With the advancement of semiconductor micro/nanofabrication technologies, planar waveguide optics will continue to provide novel approaches for 90° optical hybrid development. In such waveguide structures, light is confined within micron-scale cores, which enables a substantial reduction in the chip footprint of a 90° optical hybrid.
The current commercially available 90° optical hybrid devices, while demonstrating superior detection accuracy in practical applications, are hindered by three primary limitations: non-compact physical dimensions, incompatibility with integrated coherent transceivers, and high production costs. The proposed 90° optical hybrid based on a multimode interference (MMI) structure addresses these limitations by exhibiting low excess loss, a broad operational bandwidth, and the ability to be created via simple fabrication processes while also demonstrating strong compatibility with integrated coherent receivers.
The performance metrics in Table 1 contrast the proposed device with existing counterparts across different platforms. Benchmarked against prior 90° optical hybrids with diverse architectures on distinct material platforms, the proposed 90° hybrid demonstrates a more compact footprint while achieving broad operational bandwidth alongside comparable CMRR and excess loss characteristics. The proposed chip structure is manufactured via a simple fabrication process. Further refinement of etching processes presents a viable pathway to reducing excess loss and mitigating phase deviations in 90° optical hybrids, potentially enhancing device performance metrics. This 90° optical hybrid has promising prospects for integration with high-speed photodetectors and coherent modulators to realize a compact, heterogeneously integrated coherent transceiver.

5. Conclusions

In this work, we propose and demonstrate the development and testing of a 90° optical hybrid with a MMI coupler fabricated on a 600 nm thick x-cut TFLN substrate with a partial etch depth of 300 nm. To comprehensively evaluate the performance of the MMI coupler, we employed 3D FDTD simulations to analyze the impact of fabrication tolerances on the optical hybrid’s characteristics. The fabricated 90° optical hybrid exhibited a CMRR larger than 20 dB, a phase error below ±7.5°, and an excess loss less than 1.8 dB (including contributions from the 90° hybrid, the 1 × 2 MMI coupler, and the optical delay line, after subtracting the losses from the coupler and delay line, the 90° optical hybrid introduced less than 0.9 dB of loss) over the C-band with a compact footprint of 13.8 × 250 μm2, demonstrating its outstanding performance, with an ultra-compact size and simple design. The 90° optical hybrid is promising for integration with high-speed photodetectors and coherent modulators to realize a compact, heterogeneously integrated coherent transceiver.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.F. and Y.C.; data curation, H.F.; software, Z.S. and H.W.; validation, H.F., M.C. and Y.C.; resources, J.L.; writing—original draft preparation, H.F.; writing—review and editing, Z.Z.; supervision, Z.Z. and J.L.; funding acquisition, S.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by “the National Key R&D Program of China” (grant number: 2022YFB2803200) and “the National Natural Science Foundation of China” (grant number: 62405308).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but can be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sidelnikov, O.; Redyuk, A.; Sygletos, S.; Fedoruk, M.; Turitsyn, S. Advanced Convolutional Neural Networks for Nonlinearity Mitigation in Long-Haul WDM Transmission Systems. J. Light. Technol. 2021, 39, 2397–2406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tariq, F.; Khandaker, M.R.A.; Wong, K.-K.; Imran, M.A.; Bennis, M.; Debbah, M. A Speculative Study on 6G. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2020, 27, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, H.; Chai, H.; Lv, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Meng, L.; Yang, X.; Yang, T. Silicon Photonic Transceivers for Application in Data Centers. J. Semicond. 2020, 41, 101301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kim, B.G.; Kim, M.S.; Chung, Y.C. Novel Direct-Detection Receiver for Orthogonal Offset-Carrier Assisted PDM System. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 2022, 34, 71–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Abdulwahid, M.M.; Kurnaz, S. Implementation of Two Polarization DQPSK WDM Is-OWC System with Different Precoding Schemes for Long-Reach GEO Inter Satellite Link. IET Conf. Proc. 2023, 2023, 134–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sun, W.; Cao, H.; Xiang, Y.; Xie, J.; Guo, J.; Dai, D. Ultra-Low-LO-Power Optical Coherent Receiver on Silicon. In Proceedings of the 2024 Asia Communications and Photonics Conference (ACP) and International Conference on Information Photonics and Optical Communications (IPOC), Beijing, China, 2–5 November 2024; IEEE: Beijing, China, 2024; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sepehrian, H.; Lin, J.; Rusch, L.A.; Shi, W. Silicon Photonic IQ Modulators for 400 Gb/s and Beyond. J. Light. Technol. 2019, 37, 3078–3086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kikuchi, K. Fundamentals of Coherent Optical Fiber Communications. J. Light. Technol. 2016, 34, 157–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, Z.; Zhai, Y.; Lu, Y.; Xu, J.; Sun, X.; Wang, J. Compact Optical 90° Hybrid Based on Hybrid Plasmonic Multimode Interferometer. Opt. Commun. 2018, 426, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lu, Z.; Han, Q.; Ye, H.; Wang, S.; Xiao, F. Manufacturing Tolerance Analysis of Deep-Ridged 90° Hybrid Based on InP 4 × 4 MMI. Photonics 2020, 7, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Guan, H.; Ma, Y.; Shi, R.; Zhu, X.; Younce, R.; Chen, Y.; Roman, J.; Ophir, N.; Liu, Y.; Ding, R.; et al. Compact and Low Loss 90° Optical Hybrid on a Silicon-on-Insulator Platform. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 28957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yu, J.; Mu, J.; Chen, K.; Goede, M.d.; Dijkstra, M.; He, S.; García-Blanco, S.M. High-Performance 90° Hybrids Based on MMI Couplers in Si3N4 Technology. Opt. Commun. 2020, 465, 125620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhu, D.; Shao, L.; Yu, M.; Cheng, R.; Desiatov, B.; Xin, C.J.; Hu, Y.; Holzgrafe, J.; Ghosh, S.; Shams-Ansari, A.; et al. Integrated Photonics on Thin-Film Lithium Niobate. Adv. Opt. Photon. 2021, 13, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, G.; Li, N.; Ng, J.D.; Lin, H.-L.; Zhou, Y.; Fu, Y.H.; Lee, L.Y.T.; Yu, Y.; Liu, A.-Q.; Danner, A.J. Advances in Lithium Niobate Photonics: Development Status and Perspectives. Adv. Photon. 2022, 4, 034003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tan, H.; Wang, J.; Ke, W.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, Z.; Lin, Z.; Cai, X. C-Band Optical 90-Degree Hybrid Using Thin Film Lithium Niobate. Opt. Lett. 2023, 48, 1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chen, Y.; Xie, X.; Sun, Y.; Pan, W.; Yan, L. Compact Optical 90° Hybrid Based on a Wedge-Shaped 2 × 4 MMI Coupler and a 2 × 2 MMI Coupler on a Thin-Film Lithium Niobate Platform. Opt. Lett. 2024, 49, 1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Seimetz, M. Options, Feasibility, and Availability of 2 × 4 90° Hybrids for Coherent Optical Systems. J. Light. Technol. 2006, 24, 1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Soldano, L.B.; Pennings, E.C.M. Optical Multi-Mode Interference Devices Based on Self-Imaging: Principles and Applications. J. Light. Technol. 1995, 13, 615–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Miranda, A.; Yao, W.; Tol, J.J.G.M.V.D.; Williams, K.A. Miniaturization of 2 × 4 90-Degree Hybrid Optical Couplers. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 2023, 59, 0600909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hadij-ElHouati, A.; Halir, R.; Ortega-Moñux, A.; Wangüemert-Pérez, J.G.; Podmore, H.; Schmid, J.H.; Cheben, P.; Molina-Fernandez, I. Metamaterial Engineered C + L Band 90° Hybrid with 150 Nm Feature Size. In Proceedings of the IEEE Photonics Conference 2020, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 28 September–1 October 2020; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lu, Z.-Q.; Han, Q.; Ye, H.; Wang, S.; Xiao, F.; Xiao, F. High Common Mode Rejection Ratio InP 90° Optical Hybrid in Ultra-Broadband at 60 Nm with Deep-Rigded Waveguide Based on ×4 MMI Coupler*. Chin. Phys. B 2020, 29, 054206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Halir, R.; Roelkens, G.; Ortega-Moñux, A.; Wangüemert-Pérez, J.G. High-Performance 90° Hybrid Based on a Silicon-on-Insulator Multimode Interference Coupler. Opt. Lett. 2011, 36, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) Schematic of the 90° optical hybrid with MMI coupler. (b) The top-view layout of the 90° optical hybrid. (c) Cross-section of LN waveguide with shallow etched layer measuring 300 nm.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic of the 90° optical hybrid with MMI coupler. (b) The top-view layout of the 90° optical hybrid. (c) Cross-section of LN waveguide with shallow etched layer measuring 300 nm.
Photonics 12 00459 g001
Figure 2. Simulated optical propagation field: (a) input port of I1; (b) input port of I3; (cf) both input ports of I1 and I3 with different initial phase conditions: (0, π / 4 ), (0, π / 4 ), (0, 3 π / 4 ), and (0, 3 π / 4 ). Calculated (g) excess loss, (h) phase errors, and (i) CMRRs at a wavelength of 1530 nm to 1565 nm.
Figure 2. Simulated optical propagation field: (a) input port of I1; (b) input port of I3; (cf) both input ports of I1 and I3 with different initial phase conditions: (0, π / 4 ), (0, π / 4 ), (0, 3 π / 4 ), and (0, 3 π / 4 ). Calculated (g) excess loss, (h) phase errors, and (i) CMRRs at a wavelength of 1530 nm to 1565 nm.
Photonics 12 00459 g002
Figure 3. The calculations were performed considering a core width variation tolerance of ΔW = −0.1 µm ((a) excess loss, (b) phase errors, and (c) CMRRs across a wavelength range of 1530 nm to 1565 nm); a core width variation tolerance of ΔW = +0.1 µm ((d) excess loss, (e) phase errors, and (f) CMRRs at a wavelength of 1530 nm to 1565 nm); a core length variation tolerance of ΔL = −1 µm ((g) excess loss, (h) phase errors, and (i) CMRRs across a wavelength range of 1530 nm to 1565 nm); and a core length variation tolerance of ΔL = +1 µm ((j) excess loss, (k) phase errors, and (l) CMRRs across a wavelength range of 1530 nm to 1565 nm).
Figure 3. The calculations were performed considering a core width variation tolerance of ΔW = −0.1 µm ((a) excess loss, (b) phase errors, and (c) CMRRs across a wavelength range of 1530 nm to 1565 nm); a core width variation tolerance of ΔW = +0.1 µm ((d) excess loss, (e) phase errors, and (f) CMRRs at a wavelength of 1530 nm to 1565 nm); a core length variation tolerance of ΔL = −1 µm ((g) excess loss, (h) phase errors, and (i) CMRRs across a wavelength range of 1530 nm to 1565 nm); and a core length variation tolerance of ΔL = +1 µm ((j) excess loss, (k) phase errors, and (l) CMRRs across a wavelength range of 1530 nm to 1565 nm).
Photonics 12 00459 g003
Figure 4. (a) Microscopy images of the fabricated device; (b) 1 × 2 MMI coupler; (c) 90° optical hybrid.
Figure 4. (a) Microscopy images of the fabricated device; (b) 1 × 2 MMI coupler; (c) 90° optical hybrid.
Photonics 12 00459 g004
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of the test system.
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of the test system.
Photonics 12 00459 g005
Figure 6. (a) Measured transmission spectra of the 90° optical hybrid and reference waveguide; (b) the excess loss of the fabricated device, which comprises a 90° hybrid, a 3 dB coupler, and an optical delay line; (c) the relative phase errors calculated from the transmission spectra; (d) the CMRRs across a wavelength range of 1530 to 1565 nm.
Figure 6. (a) Measured transmission spectra of the 90° optical hybrid and reference waveguide; (b) the excess loss of the fabricated device, which comprises a 90° hybrid, a 3 dB coupler, and an optical delay line; (c) the relative phase errors calculated from the transmission spectra; (d) the CMRRs across a wavelength range of 1530 to 1565 nm.
Photonics 12 00459 g006
Table 1. A comparison of 90° optical hybrids.
Table 1. A comparison of 90° optical hybrids.
Ref.Total Loss/dBPhase Error/°CMRR/dBSize/μm2Bandwidth/nmPlatform
[12]<1<8>2016 × 2701520–1610Si3N4, MMI
[21]/<7>2020 × 8421530–1565InGaAsP/InP, MMI
[16]<1.3<5>2018 × 1341530–1560TFLN, 2 × 4 MMI + 2 × 2 MMI
[22]/<5>20650 × 5301530–1565SOI, MMI with a shallowly etched multimode region
This work<0.9<7.5>2013.8 × 2501530–1565TFLN, MMI
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Feng, H.; Chen, Y.; Shen, Z.; Chen, M.; Wang, H.; Liu, J.; Wang, S.; Zhao, Z. Compact Optical 90° Hybrid on a Thin-Film Lithium Niobate Platform Used for Integrated Coherent Transceivers. Photonics 2025, 12, 459. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12050459

AMA Style

Feng H, Chen Y, Shen Z, Chen M, Wang H, Liu J, Wang S, Zhao Z. Compact Optical 90° Hybrid on a Thin-Film Lithium Niobate Platform Used for Integrated Coherent Transceivers. Photonics. 2025; 12(5):459. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12050459

Chicago/Turabian Style

Feng, Haolei, Yuqiong Chen, Zheyuan Shen, Man Chen, Hanyu Wang, Jianguo Liu, Suo Wang, and Zeping Zhao. 2025. "Compact Optical 90° Hybrid on a Thin-Film Lithium Niobate Platform Used for Integrated Coherent Transceivers" Photonics 12, no. 5: 459. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12050459

APA Style

Feng, H., Chen, Y., Shen, Z., Chen, M., Wang, H., Liu, J., Wang, S., & Zhao, Z. (2025). Compact Optical 90° Hybrid on a Thin-Film Lithium Niobate Platform Used for Integrated Coherent Transceivers. Photonics, 12(5), 459. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12050459

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop