Next Article in Journal
Compact Optical 90° Hybrid on a Thin-Film Lithium Niobate Platform Used for Integrated Coherent Transceivers
Previous Article in Journal
Generation of Tunable Coherent Tri-Frequency Microwave Signals Based on Optoelectronic Oscillator
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Modified Regular Perturbation Model for the Single-Span Fiber Transmission Using Learnable Methods
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Machine Learning Applied to Optical Communication Systems

Pengcheng Laboratory, Shenzhen 518055, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Photonics 2025, 12(5), 458; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12050458
Submission received: 29 April 2025 / Accepted: 8 May 2025 / Published: 9 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Machine Learning Applied to Optical Communication Systems)

1. Introduction

As the global demand for high-speed and high-capacity communication continues to surge, driven by cloud computing, artificial intelligence, 5G, virtual reality, and the Internet of Things (IoT), optical communication systems have emerged as the backbone of modern digital infrastructure [1,2,3,4,5]. However, the increasing complexity, performance requirements, and operational scale of these systems have begun to exceed the capabilities of traditional analytical and rule-based design methods. In this context, machine learning (ML) has become a transformative tool, enabling data-driven solutions that can adapt to dynamic conditions, extract hidden patterns, and optimize performance across the optical communication stack.
In long-haul coherent optical systems, where signal integrity is challenged by fiber non-linearities and polarization effects over hundreds of kilometers, ML techniques such as neural networks (NNs) and generative models have been deployed for non-linear compensation, channel equalization, and signal reconstruction [6,7,8,9]. For instance, deep learning models trained on simulated or real-world data can outperform conventional Volterra filters or digital backpropagation, offering both improved accuracy and flexibility [10,11,12,13]. In short-reach and direct-detection systems, including intensity-modulated direct-detection (IM/DD) links widely used in data centers, ML is increasingly used to counteract combined linear and non-linear impairments [14,15,16,17]. For example, NNs and support vector machines (SVMs) have been shown to enhance equalization, improve bit error rate (BER) performance, and adapt to non-idealities in low-cost hardware implementations, such as directly modulated lasers (DMLs), vertical cavity surface emitting lasers (VCSELs), and silicon photonic transceivers [18,19,20,21]. Passive optical networks (PONs) and optical access systems demand high bandwidth at a low cost, with minimal latency and high reliability. Here, ML is also employed for intelligent receiver implementation [22,23,24,25], enabling better system resilience and performance optimization.
Visible light communication (VLC) and optical wireless communication (OWC) are emerging as complementary technologies for indoor environments and last-meter access [26,27,28]. ML has proven particularly effective in these domains, supporting signal demodulation, distortion compensation, and positioning through image-based or channel-aware learning techniques. End-to-end learning using autoencoders and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) has shown strong potential to optimize the optical-to-electrical (O/E) conversion and enhance signal robustness [29,30,31,32]. In more advanced and non-traditional systems, such as chaos-based secure communication and photonic reservoir computing, ML enables reliable chaos recovery, signal decoding, and multi-channel synchronization [33,34,35,36]. These systems benefit from the adaptability and high dimensionality of learning-based methods, which can capture complex temporal and spectral features beyond the reach of conventional models. Finally, optical network management has also embraced ML in the form of AI-enhanced network orchestration, software-defined control, and optical performance monitoring [37,38,39,40]. These applications support real-time optimization, fault localization, and predictive maintenance, aligning with the goals of intelligent and autonomous network operation [41,42,43,44].
By covering this rich spectrum of systems and applications, the papers in this Special Issue collectively demonstrate the vast potential of ML in shaping the next generation of optical communication networks. From physical-layer enhancements to system-level intelligence, ML is not only a tool for performance improvement, but also an enabler of fundamentally new architectures and functionalities.

2. An Overview of the Published Articles

This Special Issue, “Machine Learning Applied to Optical Communication Systems”, brings together a diverse collection of research contributions that highlight the synergy between ML and a wide range of optical communication technologies. This Special Issue collects 14 diverse contributions, including three comprehensive review papers and 11 original research articles that exemplify the growing synergy between machine learning and optical communication systems. The selected works span various system types, including long-haul coherent transmission, short-reach interconnects, PONs, OWC, and chaos-based secure transmission systems. Each type of system poses distinct challenges ranging from non-linear impairments and chromatic dispersion to noise accumulation and hardware limitations, and ML offers promising techniques to address them. Below is a brief overview of each contribution.
For the research articles, in contribution 1, He et al. propose a modified regular perturbation (MRP) model enhanced with trainable parameters to improve the accuracy of fiber transmission modeling under dispersion and non-linearity. This hybrid physical–ML model effectively reduces fitting error, even under high launch power and dual-polarization transmission scenarios. In contribution 2, Freitas and Pires present an NN-based framework for the rapid estimation of capacity and cost in large-scale multi-fiber optical networks. The model achieves high accuracy with significant computational efficiency, serving as a practical tool for real-time network design and planning. In contribution 3, Vu et al. introduce DeepChaos+, a deep learning-based framework for chaos signal removal in wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) systems. Their model enhances detection performance while reducing the BER by about three orders of magnitude, offering a robust solution for chaos-based secure communications. In contribution 4, Srinivasan et al. propose a novel ML-driven equalization method using gradient-based optimization for VCSEL-based transceivers. The technique improves signal integrity in thermally unstable environments, a key need for data center and automotive interconnects. In contribution 5, Liem et al. present an ML-enhanced resilience mechanism for NG-EPONs to support ultra-reliable tactile Internet applications. The system utilizes ML for fault detection and software-defined networking (SDN) for proactive recovery, achieving excellent performance in reliability metrics. In contribution 6, Ji et al. apply attention-based CNNs to mitigate angle-induced distortion in camera-based visible light positioning systems. Their model significantly reduces the number of positioning errors, paving the way for practical and precise indoor navigation. In contribution 7, Osahon et al. demonstrate that a multilayer perceptron-based decision feedback equalizer (DFE) significantly outperforms the traditional methods in OWC links, particularly under high non-linear distortions. This paves the way for higher data rates in safe, short-range optical wireless links. In contribution 8, Luna-Rivera et al. address the often-neglected role of optical-to-electrical conversion in VLC systems. Using autoencoder architectures, they improve robustness and system performance, offering insights into practical VLC design for 5G and IoT networks. In contribution 9, Hung et al. propose a Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI)-based optical NN to regenerate the intensity-modulated signals distorted by the bandwidth limitations of Silicon micro-ring modulators. Their photonic NN matches digital NN performance, underscoring the promise of optical ML hardware for high-speed systems. In contribution 10, Zhong et al. present a photonic reservoir computing system using quantum dot spin-VCSELs for coherent optical chaos-based secure communication. They achieve robust demodulation of complex modulated signals, validating the potential of optical chaos and reservoir computing. In contribution 11, Guo et al. tackle interference from auxiliary management channels in PON systems using Gaussian mixture model (GMM)-based probabilistic shaping. The joint optimization at transmitter and receiver significantly reduces the bit error rates, improving system robustness.
For the review articles, in contribution 12, Xu et al. review NN-based equalizers for IM/DD systems, addressing their ability to mitigate non-linear impairments while highlighting the challenge of computational complexity. The paper offers a comparative analysis of network types and proposes strategies for reducing model size and power consumption, paving the way for practical deployments. In contribution 13, Shao et al. survey ML applications in short-reach systems, focusing on digital signal processing (DSP), monitoring, and control. A key contribution is their taxonomy of time series models, offering a structured view of recent advances. The review also discusses the limitations in the current methods and suggests directions for more efficient and scalable ML integration. In contribution 14, Wu et al. provide an overview of the ML techniques in self-coherent systems, emphasizing improvements in signal recovery and phase tracking. The paper discusses how ML enhances self-coherent detection performance while reducing hardware complexity, and outlines future trends in low-cost, ML-assisted self-coherent designs.

3. Conclusions

In summary, this Special Issue highlights the growing synergy between ML and optical communication systems, showcasing advancements across different optical communication applications. The eleven original research articles and three review papers collectively demonstrate how ML techniques can effectively tackle system impairments, optimize performance, and enable intelligent network management. These contributions underline the increasing role of ML as a core technology in optical systems, while also pointing toward key future challenges such as complexity reduction and real-time adaptability. ML is no longer a peripheral or auxiliary tool for optical communication; it is becoming a fundamental enabler of the next generation of optical systems. We hope that this Special Issue serves not only as a record of current advancements, but also as a roadmap for future exploration.

Acknowledgments

We would like to sincerely thank all the authors, reviewers, and editorial staff who contributed to the success of this Special Issue. We hope that this collection of works will inspire further research, foster new interdisciplinary collaborations, and accelerate the intelligent transformation of optical communication systems in the coming years.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions:

  • He, S.; Li, Z.; Xing, S.; Yan, A.; Zhou, Y.; Shi, J.; Shen, C.; Li, Z.; He, Z.; Chen, W.; et al. A Modified Regular Perturbation Model for the Single-Span Fiber Transmission Using Learnable Methods. Photonics 2024, 11, 1178. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11121178.
  • Freitas, A.; Pires, J. Using Artificial Neural Networks to Evaluate the Capacity and Cost of Multi-Fiber Optical Backbone Networks. Photonics 2024, 11, 1110. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11121110.
  • Vu, D.A.; Do, N.K.H.; Nguyen, H.N.T.; Dam, H.M.; Tran, T.T.T.; Nguyen, Q.X.; Truong, D.C. DeepChaos+: Signal Detection Quality Enhancement of High-Speed DP-16QAM Optical Fiber Communication Based on Chaos Masking Technique with Deep Generative Models. Photonics 2024, 11, 967. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11100967.
  • Srinivasan, M.; Pourafzal, A.; Giannakopoulos, S.; Andrekson, P.; Häger, C.; Wymeersch, H. Learning Gradient-Based Feed-Forward Equalizer for VCSELs. Photonics 2024, 11, 943. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11100943.
  • Liem, A.T.; Hwang, I.-S.; Kharga, R.; Teng, C.-H. Enhancing Tactile Internet Reliability: AI-Driven Resilience in NG-EPON Networks. Photonics 2024, 11, 903. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11100903.
  • Ji, W.; Hu, L.; Zhang, X.; Lou, J.; Chen, H.; Wang, Z. The Stability Optimization of Indoor Visible 3D Positioning Algorithms Based on Single-Light Imaging Using Attention Mechanism Convolutional Neural Networks. Photonics 2024, 11, 794. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11090794.
  • Osahon, I.N.O.; Kostakis, I.; Powell, D.; Meredith, W.; Missous, M.; Haas, H.; Tang, J.; Rajbhandari, S. Neural Network Equalisation for High-Speed Eye-Safe Optical Wireless Communication with 850 nm SM-VCSELs. Photonics 2024, 11, 772. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11080772.
  • Luna-Rivera, J.M.; Rabadan, J.; Rufo, J.; Gutierrez, C.A.; Guerra, V.; Perez-Jimenez, R. Impact of Optical-to-Electrical Conversion on the Design of an End-to-End Learning RGB-LED-Based Visible Light Communication System. Photonics 2024, 11, 616. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11070616.
  • Hung, T.-Y.; Chan, D.W.U.; Peng, C.-W.; Chow, C.-W.; Tsang, H.K. Regeneration of 200 Gbit/s PAM4 Signal Produced by Silicon Microring Modulator (SiMRM) Using Mach–Zehnder Interferometer (MZI)-Based Optical Neural Network (ONN). Photonics 2024, 11, 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11040349.
  • Zhong, D.; Wang, T.; Chen, Y.; Wu, Q.; Qiu, C.; Zeng, H.; Wang, Y.; Xi, J. Exploration of Four-Channel Coherent Optical Chaotic Secure Communication with the Rate of 400 Gb/s Using Photonic Reservoir Computing Based on Quantum Dot Spin-VCSELs. Photonics 2024, 11, 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11040309.
  • Guo, H.; Yang, C.; Chen, Z.; Li, H. Enhanced PON and AMCC Joint Transmission with GMM-Based Probability Shaping Techniques. Photonics 2024, 11, 227. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11030227.
  • Xu, Z.; Ji, T.; Wu, Q.; Lu, W.; Ji, H.; Yang, Y.; Qiao, G.; Tang, J.; Cheng, C.; Liu, L.; et al. Advanced Neural Network-Based Equalization in Intensity-Modulated Direct-Detection Optical Systems: Current Status and Future Trends. Photonics 2024, 11, 702. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11080702.
  • Shao, C.; Giacoumidis, E.; Billah, S.M.; Li, S.; Li, J.; Sahu, P.; Richter, A.; Faerber, M.; Kaefer, T. Machine Learning in Short-Reach Optical Systems: A Comprehensive Survey. Photonics 2024, 11, 613. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11070613.
  • Wu, Q.; Xu, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ji, H.; Yang, Y.; Qiao, G.; Liu, L.; Wang, S.; Liang, J.; et al. Machine Learning for Self-Coherent Detection Short-Reach Optical Communications. Photonics 2023, 10, 1001. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10091001.

References

  1. Wei, J.; Giacoumidis, E.; Zhou, J.; Jarajreh, M.; Li, S.; Aldaya, I.; Lu, Y.; Tsokanos, A.; Richter, A. Effective Handling of Nonlinear Distortions in CO-OFDM Using Affinity Propagation Clustering. Opt. Express 2022, 30, 15697–15707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ji, H.; Dong, S.; Xu, Z.; Li, J.; Unnithan, R.; Su, Y.; Shieh, W. Carrier Assisted Differential Detection with Generalized and Simplified Receiver Structure. J. Light. Technol. 2021, 39, 7159–7167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wu, Q.; Xu, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Ji, H.; Yang, Y.; Qiao, G.; Liu, L.; Wang, S.; Liang, J.; Wei, J.; et al. Gradient-Descent Noise Whitening Techniques for Short-Reach IM-DD Optical Interconnects with Severe Bandwidth Limitation. Opt. Express 2024, 32, 1715–1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ji, T.; Sun, C.; Ji, H.; Xu, Z.; Shieh, W. Field Recovery at Low CSPR Using Interleaved Carrier Assisted Differential Detection. In Proceedings of the Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), San Diego, CA, USA, 8–12 March 2020; p. W4A.3. [Google Scholar]
  5. Tan, Z.; Yang, C.; Xu, Z.; Chen, L.; Huang, X.; Guo, H.; Zheng, Z.; Zhang, F.; Wang, Z. Experimental Demonstration for over Mbps Baseband-over-Modulation AMCC Implementation in PtP WDM-PON. In Proceedings of the 2018 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exposition (OFC), San Diego, CA, USA, 11–15 March 2018; p. Tu3L.3. [Google Scholar]
  6. Jarajreh, M.A.; Giacoumidis, E.; Aldaya, I.; Le, S.T.; Tsokanos, A.; Ghassemlooy, Z.; Doran, N.J. Artificial Neural Network Nonlinear Equalizer for Coherent Optical OFDM. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2014, 27, 387–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Silva, L.C.B.; Marciano, P.R.N.; Pontes, M.J.; Monteiro, M.E.; André, P.S.B.; Segatto, M.E.V. Integrated Photonic Neural Networks for Equalizing Optical Communication Signals: A Review. Photonics 2025, 12, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Freire, P.J.; Osadchuk, Y.; Spinnler, B.; Napoli, A.; Schairer, W.; Costa, N.; Prilepsky, J.E.; Turitsyn, S.K. Performance Versus Complexity Study of Neural Network Equalizers in Coherent Optical Systems. J. Light. Technol. 2021, 39, 6085–6096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wei, J.; Yi, L.; Giacoumidis, E.; Cheng, Q.; Tao Lau, A.P. Special Issue on “Optics for AI and AI for Optics”. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, X.; Li, C.; Jiang, Z.; Han, L. Low-Complexity Pruned Convolutional Neural Network Based Nonlinear Equalizer in Coherent Optical Communication Systems. Electronics 2023, 12, 3120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hassan, S.; Tariq, N.; Naqvi, R.A.; Rehman, A.U.; Kaabar, M.K. Performance Evaluation of Machine Learning-Based Channel Equalization Techniques: New Trends and Challenges. J. Sens. 2022, 2022, 2053086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. He, P.; Wu, F.; Yang, M.; Yang, A.; Guo, P.; Qiao, Y.; Xin, X. A Fiber Nonlinearity Compensation Scheme with Complex-Valued Dimension-Reduced Neural Network. IEEE Photonics J. 2021, 13, 7200507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Deligiannidis, S.; Mesaritakis, C.; Bogris, A. Performance and Complexity Analysis of Bi-directional Recurrent Neural Network Models Versus Volterra Nonlinear Equalizers in Digital Coherent Systems. J. Light. Technol. 2021, 39, 5791–5798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xu, Z.; Sun, C.; Dong, S.; Manton, J.H.; Shieh, W. Towards Low Computational Complexity for Neural Network-Based Equalization in PAM4 Short-Reach Direct Detection Systems by Multi-Symbol Prediction. In Proceedings of the Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), San Francisco, CA, USA, 6–10 June 2021; p. Th1A.47. [Google Scholar]
  15. Peng, C.; Chan, D.; Chow, C.; Hung, T.; Jian, Y.; Tong, Y.; Kuo, P.; Chen, G.; Liu, Y.; Yeh, C.; et al. Long Short Term Memory Neural Network (LSTMNN) and Inter-Symbol Feature Extraction for 160 Gbit/s PAM4 from Silicon Micro-Ring Transmitter. Opt. Commun. 2023, 529, 129067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Taniguchi, H.; Yamamoto, S.; Masuda, A.; Kisaka, Y.; Kanazawa, S. 800-Gbps PAM-4 2-km Transmission using 4-λ LAN-WDM TOSA with MLSE based on Deep Neural Network. In Proceedings of the Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), San Diego, CA, USA, 6–10 March 2022. [Google Scholar]
  17. Arnold, E.; Bocherer, G.; Strasser, F.; Muller, E.; Spilger, P.; Billaudelle, S.; Weis, J.; Schemmel, J.; Calabro, S.; Kuschnerov, M. Spiking Neural Network Nonlinear Demapping on Neuromorphic Hardware for IM/DD Optical Communication. J. Light. Technol. 2023, 41, 3424–3431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, B.; Bluemm, C.; Calabro, S.; Li, B.; Schlichtmann, U. Area-Efficient Neural Network CD Equalizer for 4 × 200Gb/s PAM4 CWDM4 Systems. In Proceedings of the Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), San Diego, CA, USA, 5–9 March 2023. [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen, G.; Du, J.; Sun, L.; Zhang, W.; Xu, K.; Chen, X.; Reed, G.T.; He, Z. Nonlinear Distortion Mitigation by Machine Learning of SVM Classification for PAM-4 andPAM-8 Modulated Optical Interconnection. J. Light. Technol. 2018, 3, 650–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xu, Z.; Wu, Q.; Lu, W.; Ji, H.; Chen, H.; Ji, T.; Yang, Y.; Qiao, G.; Tang, J.; Cheng, C.; et al. Weight-Adaptive Joint Mixed-Precision Quantization and Pruning for Neural Network-Based Equalization in Short-Reach Direct Detection Links. Opt. Lett. 2024, 49, 3500–3503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, X.; Li, J.; Fan, Z.; Zhao, J. Transfer-Learning Based Convolutional Neural Network for Short-Reach Optical Interconnects. In Proceedings of the Asia Communications and Photonics Conference (ACP), Shanghai, China, 24–27 October 2021. [Google Scholar]
  22. Miao, X.; Bi, M.; Yu, J.; Li, L.; Hu, W. SVM-Modified-FFE Enabled Chirp Management for 10G DML-based 50Gb/s/λ PAM4 IM-DD PON. In Proceedings of the Optical Fiber Communications Conference (OFC), San Diego, CA, USA, 3–7 March 2019. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kaneda, N.; Zhu, Z.; Chuang, C.; Mahadevan, A.; Farah, B.; Bergman, K.; Veen, D.; Houtsma, V. FPGA Implementation of Deep Neural Network Based Equalizers for High-Speed PON. In Proceedings of the Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), San Diego, CA, USA, 8–12 March 2020. [Google Scholar]
  24. Chen, Z.; Wang, W.; Zou, D.; Ni, W.; Luo, D.; Li, F. Real-Valued Neural Network Nonlinear Equalization for Long-Reach PONs Based on SSB Modulation. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2022, 35, 167–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Huang, L.; Jiang, W.; Xu, Y.; Hu, W.; Yi, L. Low-Complexity Volterra-Inspired Neural Network Equalizer in 100-G Band-Limited IMDD PON System. Opt. Lett. 2022, 47, 5692–5695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lu, X.; Qiao, L.; Zhou, Y.; Yu, W.; Chi, N. An I-Q-Time 3-dimensional post-equalization algorithm based on DBSCAN of machine learning in CAP VLC system. Opt. Commun. 2019, 430, 299–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Haigh, P.A.; Ghassemlooy, Z.; Rajbhandari, S.; Papakonstantinou, I.; Popoola, W. Visible light communications: 170 Mb/s using an artificial neural network equalizer in a low bandwidth white light configuration. J. Light. Technol. 2014, 32, 1807–1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Loureiro, P.A.; Fernandes, G.M.; Correia, S.F.; Ferreira, R.A.; Guiomar, F.P.; Monteiro, P.P. Multi-Gigabit RGB-VLC Transmission with Jointly Optimized Lighting and Communications. J. Light. Technol. 2024, 42, 4425–4432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jin, R.; Wei, Y.; Zhang, J.; Shi, J.; Chi, N. Neural-Network-Based End-To-End Learning for Adaptive Optimization of Two-Dimensional Signal Generation in UVLC Systems. Opt. Express 2024, 32, 6309–6328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lu, X.; Li, Y.; Chen, X.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y. Discrete wavelet transform assisted convolutional neural network equalizer for PAM VLC system. Opt. Express 2024, 32, 10429–10443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xu, B.; Min, T.; Yue, C.P. Design of PAM-8 VLC Transceiver System Employing Neural Network-Based FFE and Post-Equalization. Electronics 2022, 11, 3908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lu, X.; Lu, C.; Yu, W.; Qiao, L.; Liang, S.; Lau, A.P.T.; Chi, N. Memory-controlled deep LSTM neural network post-equalizer used in high-speed PAM VLC system. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 7822–7833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mobini, M.; Kaddoum, G.; Herceg, M. Design of a SIMO Deep Learning-Based Chaos Shift Keying (DLCSK) Communication System. Sensors 2022, 22, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ke, J.; Yi, L.; Yang, Z.; Yang, Y.; Zhuge, Q.; Chen, Y.; Hu, W. 32 Gb/s chaotic optical communications by deep-learning-based chaos synchronization. Opt. Lett. 2019, 44, 5776–5779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. He, L.; Lai, R.; Shao, S.; Li, Z. Design of a Chaotic Communication System Based on Deep Learning with Two-Dimensional Reshaping. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2024, 73, 10421–10434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, H.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, Y.; Wu, Z. Reliable and Secure Deep Learning-Based OFDM-DCSK Transceiver Design without Delivery of Reference Chaotic Sequences. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2022, 71, 8059–8074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tanimura, T.; Hoshida, T.; Kato, T.; Watanabe, S.; Morikawa, H. Convolutional Neural Network-Based Optical Performance Monitoring for Optical Transport Networks. J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 2019, 11, A52–A59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wu, X.; Jargon, J.A.; Skoog, R.A.; Paraschis, L.; Willner, A.E. Applications of Artificial Neural Networks in Optical Performance Monitoring. J. Light. Technol. 2009, 27, 3580–3589. [Google Scholar]
  39. Khan, F.N.; Zhou, Y.; Lau, A.P.T.; Lu, C. Modulation Format Identification in Heterogeneous Fiber-Optic Networks Using Artificial Neural Networks. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 12422–12431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Abdelli, K.; Tropschug, C.; Griesser, H.; Pachnicke, S. Fault Monitoring in Passive Optical Networks using Machine Learning Techniques. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks, Bucharest, Romania, 2–6 July 2023; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  41. Khan, F.N.; Zhong, K.; Zhou, X.; Al-Arashi, W.H.; Yu, C.; Lu, C.; Lau, A.P.T. Joint OSNR monitoring and modulation format identification in digital coherent receivers using deep neural networks. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 17767–17776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, C.; Fu, S.; Xiao, Z.; Tang, M.; Liu, D. Long Short-Term Memory Neural Network (LSTM-NN) Enabled Accurate Optical Signal-to-Noise Ratio (OSNR) Monitoring. J. Light. Technol. 2019, 37, 4140–4146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Saif, W.S.; Esmail, M.A.; Ragheb, A.M.; Alshawi, T.A.; Alshebeili, S.A. Machine Learning Techniques for Optical Performance Monitoring and Modulation Format Identification: A Survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2020, 22, 2839–2882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Musumeci, F.; Rottondi, C.E.M.; Corani, G.; Shahkarami, S.; Cugini, F.; Tornatore, M. A Tutorial on Machine Learning for Failure Management in Optical Networks. J. Light. Technol. 2019, 37, 4125–4139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, Z.; Wei, J. Machine Learning Applied to Optical Communication Systems. Photonics 2025, 12, 458. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12050458

AMA Style

Xu Z, Wei J. Machine Learning Applied to Optical Communication Systems. Photonics. 2025; 12(5):458. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12050458

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Zhaopeng, and Jinlong Wei. 2025. "Machine Learning Applied to Optical Communication Systems" Photonics 12, no. 5: 458. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12050458

APA Style

Xu, Z., & Wei, J. (2025). Machine Learning Applied to Optical Communication Systems. Photonics, 12(5), 458. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12050458

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop