Next Article in Journal
Promising Pathway of Thermostable Mannitol Dehydrogenase (MtDH) from Caldicellulosiruptor hydrothermalis 108 for D-Mannitol Synthesis
Previous Article in Journal
Design Space Calculation and Continuous Improvement Considering a Noise Parameter: A Case Study of Ethanol Precipitation Process Optimization for Carthami Flos Extract
 
 
Communication
Peer-Review Record

Heterologous Biosynthesis of Artemisinin in Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat

Separations 2021, 8(6), 75; https://doi.org/10.3390/separations8060075
by Aleksey Firsov 1,*, Alexander Pushin 1, Svetlana Motyleva 2, Svetlana Pigoleva 1, Lyubov Shaloiko 1, Alexander Vainstein 3 and Sergey Dolgov 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Separations 2021, 8(6), 75; https://doi.org/10.3390/separations8060075
Submission received: 19 April 2021 / Revised: 20 May 2021 / Accepted: 26 May 2021 / Published: 28 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Analysis of Natural Products and Pharmaceuticals)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Heterologous biosynthesis of artemisinin in Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat

Is this article a Brief Report or a research article? In the review report form appears as Brief Report, but in the template o the manuscript as Article. Please decide.

The corresponding author was not mentioned.

Please pay attention to the plant species: first time when they appear should be written with the whole name and between the brackets the short name, for example Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat (C. morifolium Ramat), and then just the short name can be used. Please put the species name in italic. For example A. annua, but not A. annua. Check this in the whole text.

Line 36 human not “hu-man”

Line 46 species not “spe-cies”

Line 59 reductase not “re-ductase”

Line 61 - accumulation not “ac-cumulation”

Line 62 why is written “2. Materials and Methods” in that place?

Please clearly highlight the aim and originality of the article at the end of the introduction

Figure 1 (especially part B) has low quality. Please provide a better one.

Please describe better the GC-MS method: (1) programed temperature (how it was increasing, hold or how time, etc) (2) was the temperature of injector and ion source negative???; (3) mention the split ratio; describe the derivatization method (procedure, temperature, time, etc)

Regarding the supplementary material, the Arteannuin A and B formulas are not visible (low quality); please provided better quality formulas. The table is not in the journal format. Please see the template.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

Thank you for the nice manuscript. However, your manuscript needs some corrections.

  1. Please use the italic font for the genus and species name.
  2. RT 21:20 min or 21.20 min? (Line 73 and 79).
  3. Please correct the hyphenated words.
  4. The quality of axis labels dan titles in Figure 2 need to be improved. They are too small and not so clear.
  5. Unfortunately, there is no information about how much artemisinin from the dried sample was detected. It would be better if the authors could provide this information (if possible).

Best regards,

Reviewer

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The role of artemisinin in malaria treatment is indisputable. In this purpose artemisinin biosynthesis pathway in A.annua is well studied  and various methods for producing arthemisinin are development. 

After manuscript reading, one conclusion to Authors  it appear. Other concerns were explained in non-published material.

The mechanism of different artemisinin production can be explained of transcriptome level by RNA-Seq or microarray methods. Did you think about such analyzes?

In my opinion, the manuscript is sufficient like a Brief Report after text editing.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors addressed all my comments and suggestions. I suggest that the manuscript will be accepted in the current form.

Back to TopTop