Next Article in Journal
Blended Sewage Sludge–Palm Kernel Expeller to Enhance the Palatability of Black Soldier Fly Larvae for Biodiesel Production
Next Article in Special Issue
A Review of the Extraction and Closed-Loop Spray Drying-Assisted Micro-Encapsulation of Algal Lutein for Functional Food Delivery
Previous Article in Journal
Permeability Evolution of Naturally Fractured Coal Injected with High-Temperature Nitrogen: Experimental Observations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Microencapsulation of Flaxseed Oil—State of Art

1
Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Food Science, Szent István University, Ménesi st 44, HU-1118 Budapest, Hungary
2
Department of Food Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Food Science, Szent István University, Budapest, Somlói st 14–16, HU-1118 Budapest, Hungary
3
Institute of Supply Chain Management, Marketing and Tourism, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Szent István University, Páter Károly St. 1, H-2100 Gödöllő, Hungary
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2021, 9(2), 295; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9020295
Submission received: 21 December 2020 / Revised: 26 January 2021 / Accepted: 30 January 2021 / Published: 3 February 2021

Abstract

:
Microencapsulation is a well-known technology for the lipid delivery system. It prevents the oxidation of fatty acids and maintains the quality of lipid after extraction from oil seed and processing. In flaxseed oil, the amount of ω-3 and ω-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids are 39.90–60.42% and 12.25–17.44%, respectively. A comprehensive review article on the microencapsulation of flaxseed oil has not been published yet. Realizing the great advantages of flaxseed oil, information about different technologies related to the microencapsulation of flaxseed oil and their characteristics are discussed in a comprehensive way, in this review article. To prepare the microcapsule of flaxseed oil, an emulsion of oil-water is performed along with a wall material (matrix), followed by drying with a spray-dryer or freeze-dryer. Different matrices, such as plant and animal-based proteins, maltodextrin, gum Arabic, and modified starch are used for the encapsulation of flaxseed oil. In some cases, emulsifiers, such as Tween 80 and soya lecithin are used to prepare flaxseed oil microcapsules. Physico-chemical and bio-chemical characteristics of flaxseed oil microcapsules depend on process parameters, ratio of oil and matrix, and characteristics of the matrix. As an example, the size of the microcapsule, prepared with spray-drying and freeze-drying ranges between 10–400 and 20–5000 μm, respectively. It may be considered that the comprehensive information on the encapsulation of flaxseed oil will boost the development of functional foods and biopharmaceuticals.

1. Introduction

Flaxseed (latin name Linum usitatissimum) is an abundant source of polyunsaturated fatty acids, short chain polyunsaturated fatty acids [1], soluble and insoluble fibers [2], phytoestrogenic lignans, antioxidants [3], and proteins [4]. In flaxseed, the total amount of fat is quite high (41% weight basis) compared to the carbohydrate (29% weight basis) and protein (20% weight basis). In flaxseed oil, the contents of palmitic acid (C16:0), stearic acid (C18:0), oleic acid (C18:1), α-linolenic acid (C18:3) (ω-3), and linoleic acid (C18:2) (ω-6) are 4.90–8.00%, 2.24–4.59%, 13.44–19.39%, 39.90–60.42%, and 12.25–17.44%, respectively [5]. Different types of ω-3 and ω-6 fatty acids present in flaxseed oil are represented in Figure 1.
Polyunsaturated essential fatty acids, such as ω-3 and ω-6 fatty acids are characterized by the presence of a double bond in three and six atoms, respectively away from the terminal methyl group in their chemical structure [1]. Both ω-3 and ω-6 fatty acids are important for cell membrane development and precursor molecules of many physiological elements, which are involved in controlling inflammatory reactions, blood pressure, and mortal cardiac diseases. Additionally, ω-3 fatty acids reduce the risk of diabetes and certain types of cancer. Eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids can be synthesised from the α-linolenic acid [6]. In many foods, the addition of ω-3 fatty acid maintains the ratio of ω-3 fatty acid to ω-6 fatty acid [7]. Clinically, it has been proven that the ratio of ω-6 fatty acid to ω-3 fatty acid in a diet 4:1 or less is beneficial for health. Unfortunately, in many diets, this ratio ranges between 10:1 and 50:1 [8]. Therefore, flaxseed oil is popularly used in food and biopharmaceutical industries. In the food industry, flaxseed oil was used to prepare dahi (Indian yogurt) [9], healthy milk [10], ice cream [11], soup powder [12], and bread [13]. Presently, its application to develop the ketogenic diet has gained lots of attention [14,15,16]. In the biopharmaceutical industry, flaxseed oil is used to prepare formulations for the treatment and prevention of gastrointestinal disorders, cardiovascular disease, eczemas, hypertension, atherosclerosis, diabetes, and cancer [5]. The application of flaxseed oil in different food matrixes and biopharmaceuticals for the prevention of different diseases are represented in Figure 2.
Biological activities of flaxseed oil against various autoimmune and chronic inflammatory diseases are associated with several mechanisms, such as (a) modifications in cell membrane lipid composition, (b) expression of genetic activity, (c) cellular metabolism and, (d) signal transduction [17]. Furthermore, orbitides or cyclolinopeptides with an antitumor activity are abundant in flaxseed oil [18]. The micronutrient tocopherol present in flaxseed oil acts as an antioxidant and suppresses the activity of reactive oxygen species. Even though flaxseed oil is rich in antioxidants, after its extraction from the seed and purification, fatty acids in flaxseed oil are easily oxidized. Oxidized fatty acids change the organoleptic property of food and deteriorate the nutritional status [19,20,21]. Therefore, the microencapsulation of flaxseed oil is a prerequisite that ensures its stability in the food matrix.
However, several biological activities of flaxseed oil are reported [14] and its industrial production is still limited. It might be due to the lack of technologically needed information. Considering the great potentiality of flaxseed oil as well as the microencapsulation technology, some laboratory-scale investigations were performed by several research groups. In this review article, information about different technologies on the microencapsulation of flaxseed oil and biochemical characteristics of the microcapsule are discussed in a comprehensive way.

2. Microencapsulation

Microencapsulation has been explored in order to satisfy the increasing expectation of developing food ingredients with complex properties and functional values. It is an emerging technology which has been receiving interest in food and biopharmaceutical industries. It is used to protect encapsulated bioactive compounds and control their release. In the microencapsulation technology, small droplets of liquid or solid particles are coated within a thin film, known as a wall material or matrix [22,23]. For the microencapsulation of food-grade bioactive compounds, different techniques have been adopted and they can be classified into three distinctive categories. Those include (a) chemical methods: Entrapping the bioactive compound within the polymerized matrix, (b) physical methods: Spray-drying, spray coating, freeze-drying, and supercritical encapsulation processes, and (c) physico-chemical methods: Complex coacervation, entrapment within the nanostructured lipid matrix, ionotropic gelation, and molecular inclusion [24]. For the microencapsulation of flaxseed oil, two major steps are: Preparation of flaxseed oil emulsion with an aqueous solution of the matrix and subsequently, spray-drying or freeze-drying.

2.1. Emulsification

The emulsion preparation plays a key role in the encapsulation efficiency. An emulsion is a mixture of two or more immiscible liquids [25]. The emulsion stability is controlled by many factors. Flocculation, a reversible aggregation of droplets and coalescence, an irreversible fusion of droplets are two main types of emulsion instabilities. The emulsifier can make a bridge between polar and non-polar components, and provides stability in the emulsion [26]. To prepare the emulsion, two different types of technologies can be adopted. Those are (a) high energy consuming technologies using mechanical devices to mix up the water and oil phase, such as (i) ultrasound generator and (ii) high pressure homogenizers, as well as (b) low energy consuming technologies, such as (i) phase inversion temperature, (ii) membrane emulsification, and (iii) spontaneous emulsification of two immiscible liquids without any significant external thermal or mechanical energy [27]. In Table 1, a summary of different emulsification technologies is provided. The emulsion stability, droplets size, and their distribution are considerably affected by the adopted technologies [28]. It has been reported that the fine emulsion increases the organoleptic properties of microcapsules [29].

2.2. Spray-Drying

Spray-drying is a commonly used technology to prepare the encapsulation of vegetable oil [36]. In the spray-drying process, due to high heat, the water content is evaporated. Subsequently, the phase of the matrix is altered and solidification of the matrix takes place. Oil droplets are encapsulated within the molten matrix in a non-homogeneous way and the size of the microcapsule ranges between 10 to 400 µm depending on the initial parameters [37]. Compared to other microencapsulation technologies, spray-drying is simple, may operate with a continuous mode, and has a low production cost. On the other hand, the disadvantages of spray-drying are (a) the availability of water-soluble matrixes is limited and (b) loss of heat energy [38]. In Figure 3, the process flow diagram of the spray-drying technology is represented.
To obtain an optimum encapsulation efficiency with a minimum amount of oil on the surface of the matrix and maximum retention of the active compound, the composition of the emulsion, technology to prepare the emulsion, and parameters of the spray-drying process are taken into consideration [38,41,42]. The composition of the emulsion, size of droplets, and the viscosity of emulsion influence the quality of the spray-dried product. In the emulsion, the ratio of oil and matrix affects the stability of emulsion and encapsulation efficiency. It also affects the physical and biochemical properties of the spray-dried product [43,44]. The lower oil content and higher matrix to oil ratio lead to a smaller droplet of oil bodies in the emulsion. In this case, the amount of oil on the surface of the matrix is reduced and encapsulation efficiency is increased. In the emulsion, viscosity is directly proportional to the droplet size and inversely proportional to the emulsion stability. These two conditions affect the encapsulation efficiency. The type of atomizer and its operating parameters are important to prepare the microcapsule since they influence the particle size. Among the existing atomizers used for breaking the bulk feed into a smaller droplet, the centrifugal wheel atomizer and spray pressure nozzle are the most used for the encapsulation of oil [40,43]. In the spray-drying process, the particle size of the product is increased with the increase in the emulsion flow. In the case of the spray pressure nozzle, the particle size of the spray-dried product is increased with the increase in the nozzle orifice diameter and decrease in the atomization pressure. In the case of the centrifugal wheel atomizer, an increase in the wheel diameter and speed provides a smaller size of the particle [43]. Furthermore, drying parameters provide the desired quality of the final product. The major drying parameters are the drying air flow, and inlet and outlet temperatures [43,44]. A high inlet temperature in the spray-drying process may lead to deterioration of the encapsulated active compound and an imbalanced evaporation of water from the matrix, which affects the encapsulation efficiency. On the other hand, a higher water content in the encapsulated product and agglomeration of the microcapsule may take place at a very low inlet temperature in the spray-drying process. Furthermore, the outlet temperature in the spray-drying process influences the stability of the microcapsule and retention of the encapsulated product. However, the outlet temperature in the spray-drying process cannot be regulated in a direct way, it can be monitored in an indirect way by controlling the solid content in the feed, inlet temperature, and feed flow rate. The spray air flow rate affects the quality of the final product. It controls the stickiness of the dried particles, deposited onto the wall of the drying chamber [43].

2.3. Freeze-Drying

Freeze-drying is also known as the lyophilization process. It is used for the dehydration of high temperature sensitive bioactive compounds, including flaxseed oil and aromas. During the freeze-drying process, a reduction of the surrounding pressure, heating of the emulsion, and sublimation of the frozen water in the material take place [39]. After crystallization of water in the emulsion, sublimation of water takes place at a minimal temperature. It promotes the transformation of water from a solid phase to vapor, directly [45]. In Figure 4, the process flow diagram of the freeze-drying technology is represented.
It is considered an expensive drying technology compared to the spray-drying process [47]. Furthermore, freeze-drying is a time occupying process, which consumes high energy. Due to the use of low temperature in the freeze-drying process, there is no thermal deterioration in the bioactive compound and less degradation in the heat-sensitive product. The moisture content in the final product is controlled by freeze-drying. Therefore, this technology provides a better quality of the product with a remarkable preservation of sensory properties of food ingredients [39,45,48]. Similar to spray-drying, the properties of the emulsion, characteristics of the matrix, and ratio of the matrix and oil are major factors to ensure the quality of the freeze-dried product. Maltodextrin, gum Arabic, and protein are commonly used as a wall material or matrix for microencapsulation through freeze-drying [40]. The freezing rate can affect the morphology of the microcapsule. A faster rate of freezing of the emulsion can lead to aggregation of the freeze-drying products. In the freeze-drying process, the system pressure and temperature influence the properties of the microcapsule. Furthermore, the operational time of drying is important to achieve a stable moisture content in the microcapsule and the stability of the final product [44,45]. Depending on the process parameters, a particle size of the freeze-dried product remains between 20 to 5000 μm [45].

2.4. Matrix (Wall Material)

For the microencapsulation of flaxseed oil, a selection of the suitable matrix, accepted in the food industry has a great importance. The matrix provides the desired stability of the encapsulated product, increases the encapsulation efficiency, and controls the release of the encapsulated item into the environment. Furthermore, the matrix provides unique physico-chemical and bio-chemical characteristics of the microcapsule [43,49]. The inexpensive wall material may reduce the cost of the process [49]. The water soluble wall material is preferable for the encapsulation of flaxseed oil. In the case of spray-drying, the wall material should be soluble in an aqueous medium to shield the encapsulated material from the external environment [40]. The drying characteristics of the matrix influence the moisture content of microcapsules. If the matrix has a chance to dry with high temperature at a minimal time, the moisture content in the microcapsule is reduced. Therefore, the encapsulated item has less chance to be contaminated with water [43,49]. An aqueous solution of the selected wall material is needed to have low viscosity with a high concentration of the solid. It helps obtain a fine microcapsule (lower particle size) and control the release of the encapsulated product. The Newtonian behavior of the emulsion is desirable for spray-drying, a continuous industrial drying process. In the case of spray-drying, previous knowledges about the glass transition temperature of the oil and matrix are a prerequisite to ensure the stability of the microcapsule, and avoid the stickiness of the obtained powder in the spray-drying chamber [43]. In Table 2, the biochemical characteristics of different matrixes along with their advantages and disadvantages for preparing the microcapsule are represented.

2.5. Emulsifier

The emulsifier, also known as “emulgent” and “surface active agents”, has a great influence on the preparation of flaxseed oil emulsion in the aqueous solution of the matrix, prior to the drying process. Emulsifiers are amphiphilic with hydrophilic/polar and hydrophobic/non-polar moieties [52]. The emulsifier reduces the interfacial tension between hydrophilic and hydrophobic compounds and makes them miscible [53]. Furthermore, emulsifiers have an antimicrobial property [54]. During the emulsification process, the hydrophilic group of emulsifier binds with water or the wall material and the hydrophobic group binds with the flaxseed oil. The concentration of the emulsifier and hydrophile–lipophile balance influence the stability of the emulsion, as well as the encapsulation efficiency [23,53,55]. For the preparation of flaxseed oil encapsulation, emulsifier Tween 80 [56] and soya lecithin [13] were used by several researchers.

3. Characterization of Microencapsulated Flaxseed Oil

Several physical and biochemical aspects were considered to characterize flaxseed oil microcapsules. The physical and biochemical properties include particle size, particle morphology, colour, moisture content, water activity, oxidative stability, encapsulation efficiency, and the release of bioactive compounds from the matrix [51,57]. These properties of flaxseed oil microcapsule depend on the type of matrix, ratio of oil and matrix or wall component, and type and amount of the emulsifier. Furthermore, the technology of microencapsulation preparation and operational parameters influence the characteristics of the flaxseed oil microcapsule. The most important characteristic of the encapsulation of flaxseed oil is the encapsulation efficiency, which is generally estimated by measuring the surface oil and total entrapped oil. Sometimes, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is used for this purpose [58]. The mean particle size and their distribution is generally evaluated by the dynamic light scattering analytical instrument [59]. The particle morphology and size are measured by electron microscopy. The moisture content influences the shelf life of the microcapsule and is measured by the evaporation of water. The moisture analyzer is used for this purpose [58,59]. The zeta potential of a microcapsule is a good indicator to understand the stability of the microcapsule in colloid and is measured by the zeta potential analyzer [59]. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy allows the understanding of the functional groups modification of the oil, matrix, and emulsifier in the microcapsule [59,60]. The oxidation of oil and fat with the time progress is a considerable important factor since the oxidation of oil and fat changes the organoleptic property of food items. The oxidation of the encapsulated oil can be evaluated by determining the peroxide value, oxidation induction period, and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) [58]. An overview of the flaxseed oil microencapsulation process and characterization of the microcapsule in terms of the oil content, particle size, encapsulation efficiency, moisture content, and oxidative stability are represented in Table 3.

4. Conclusions

The presence of ω-3 and ω-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids in flaxseed oil is abundant. To protect the polyunsaturated fatty acid from oxidation and to conserve its biochemical importance, the microencapsulated flaxseed oil has been used in the food matrix. To prepare the microcapsule of flaxseed oil, first emulsification and subsequently dehydration have been used. During the preparation of the emulsion, the amount of flaxseed oil, matrix, and emulsifiers have been varied. It is believed that their ratio significantly affects the encapsulation stability and functional properties of the microcapsule. Drying of the emulsion has been performed using the spray-drying or freeze-drying technology. Different unit operations to prepare the flaxseed oil microcapsule, such as mixing of flaxseed oil and an aqueous solution of the matrix, drying temperature, and air flow rate have been varied. It was shown that the mentioned parameters significantly affected the encapsulation efficiency, physico-chemical, and bio-chemical properties of the flaxseed oil microcapsule. Wrapping up all the information, it is perceived that flaxseed oil may receive a high reputation to develop functional foods and ketogenic diet. Furthermore, the flaxseed oil may gain a high status to develop new biopharmaceuticals. Therefore, it is expected that this review may receive attention from different research communities, as well as food and biopharmaceutical industries.

Author Contributions

A.Y. and A.N. were involved in summarizing the information, developing the figures, and writing the whole manuscript; S.L. and D.C. were involved in preparing the tables; A.T. was involved in downloading the articles from the Web of Science and Google Scholar; A.K. and G.V. were involved in cross-checking the manuscript and writing the reviewers responses. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Authors acknowledge the support from the European Union project (grant agreement no. EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16-2017-00005). A. Yakdhane, S. Labidi, and D. Chaabane acknowledge the Doctoral School of Food Science, Szent István University, Hungary. A. Koris and G. Vatai acknowledge the support of the New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology (ÚNKP-19-4-SZIE-27).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kaur, N.; Chugh, V.; Gupta, A.K. Essential fatty acids as functional components of foods—A review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 2289–2303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Singh, K.K.; Mridula, D.; Rehal, J.; Barnwal, P. Flaxseed: A Potential Source of Food, Feed and Fiber. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2011, 51, 210–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Toure, A.; Xueming, X. Flaxseed Lignans: Source, Biosynthesis, Metabolism, Antioxidant Activity, Bio-Active Components, and Health Benefits. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2010, 9, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hall, C.; Tulbek, M.C.; Xu, Y. Flaxseed. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2006, 51, 1–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Goyal, A.; Sharma, V.; Upadhyay, N.; Gill, S.; Sihag, M.K. Flax and flaxseed oil: An ancient medicine & modern functional food. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 1633–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Gibson, R.A.; Muhlhausler, B.; Makrides, M. Conversion of linoleic acid and alpha-linolenic acid to long-chain polyunsatu-rated fatty acids (LCPUFAs), with a focus on pregnancy, lactation and the first 2 years of life. Matern. Child Nutr. 2011, 7, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ludwig, D.S. The Ketogenic Diet: Evidence for Optimism but High-Quality Research Needed. J. Nutr. 2019, 150, 1354–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Simopoulos, A.P. The importance of the omega-6/omega-3 fatty acid ratio in cardiovascular disease and other chronic diseases. Exp. Biol. Med. 2008, 233, 674–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Goyal, A.; Sharma, V.; Sihag, M.K.; Singh, A.K.; Arora, S.; Sabikhi, L. Fortification of dahi (Indian yoghurt) with omega-3 fatty acids using microencapsulated flaxseed oil microcapsules. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 2422–2433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Goyal, A.; Sharma, V.; Sihag, M.K.; Singh, A.K.; Arora, S.; Sabikhi, L. Oxidative stability of alpha-linolenic acid (ω-3) in flaxseed oil microcapsules fortified market milk. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2017, 70, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gowda, A.; Sharma, V.; Goyal, A.; Singh, A.K.; Arora, S. Process optimization and oxidative stability of omega-3 ice cream fortified with flaxseed oil microcapsules. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 1705–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Rubilar, M.; Morales, E.; Contreras, K.; Ceballos, C.; Acevedo, F.; Villarroel, M.; Shene, C. Development of a soup powder en-riched with microencapsulated linseed oil as a source of omega-3 fatty acids. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2012, 114, 423–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gallardo, G.; Guida, L.; Martinez, V.; Lopez, M.C.; Bernhardt, D.; Blasco, R.; Pedroza-Islas, R.; Hermida, L.G. Microencapsulation of linseed oil by spray drying for functional food application. Food Res. Int. 2013, 52, 473–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Harvey, K.L.; Holcomb, L.E.; Kolwicz, J.S.C. Ketogenic Diets and Exercise Performance. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Parikh, M.; Maddaford, T.G.; Austria, J.A.; Aliani, M.; Netticadan, T.; Pierce, G.N. Dietary flaxseed as a strategy for improv-ing human health. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Dell, C.A.; Likhodii, S.S.; Musa, K.; Ryan, M.A.; Burnham, W.M.I.; Cunnane, S.C. Lipid and fatty acid profiles in rats con-suming different high-fat ketogenic diets. Lipids 2001, 36, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Balić, A.; Vlašić, D.; Žužul, K.; Marinović, B.; Mokos, Z.B. Omega-3 versus Omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids in the pre-vention and treatment of inflammatory skin diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Zou, X.G.; Chen, X.L.; Hu, J.N.; Wang, Y.F.; Gong, D.M.; Zhu, X.M.; Deng, Z.Y. Comparisons of proximate compositions, fatty ac-ids profile and micronutrients between fiber and oil flaxseeds (Linum usitatissimum L.). J. Food Compos. Anal. 2017, 62, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shahidi, F. Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, Volumes 1–6, 6th ed.; Wiley-Interscience: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gunstone, F.D. Vegetable Oils in Food Technology: Composition, Properties and Uses, 2nd ed.; Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  21. Holstun, J.; Zetocha, D. An Analysis of Flaxseed Utilization in the Health Food Industry; North Dakota State University: Fargo, ND, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gouin, S. Microencapsulation: Industrial appraisal of existing technologies and trends. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2004, 15, 330–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, T.T.; Yang, T.S. Optimization of emulsification and microencapsulation of evening primrose oil and its oxidative stabil-ity during storage by response surface methodology. J. Food Qual. 2011, 34, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Comunian, T.A.; Favaro-Trindade, C.S. Microencapsulation using biopolymers as an alternative to produce food enhanced with phytosterols and omega-3 fatty acids: A review. Food Hydrocoll. 2016, 61, 442–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Malik, M.A.; Wani, M.Y.; Hashim, M.A. Microemulsion method: A novel route to synthesize organic and inorganic nano-materials. 1st Nano Update. Arabian J. Chem. 2012, 5, 379–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Aronson, M.P. The role of free surfactant in destabilizing oil-in-water emulsions. Langmuir 1989, 5, 494–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nazari, M.; Mehrnia, M.A.; Jooyandeh, H.; Barzegar, H. Preparation and characterization of water in sesame oil microemul-sion by spontaneous method. J. Food Process Eng. 2019, 42, e13032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Charcosset, C. Preparation of emulsions and particles by membrane emulsification for the food processing industry. J. Food Eng. 2009, 92, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shima, M.; Kobayashi, Y.; Fujii, T.; Tanaka, M.; Kimura, Y.; Adachi, S.; Matsuno, R. Preparation of fine W/O/W emulsion through membrane filtration of coarse W/O/W emulsion and disappearance of the inclusion of outer phase solution. Food Hydrocoll. 2004, 18, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gaikwad, S.G.; Pandit, A.B. Ultrasound emulsification: Effect of ultrasonic and physicochemical properties on dispersed phase volume and droplet size. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2008, 15, 554–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Stang, M.; Schuchmann, H.; Schubert, H. Emulsification in High-Pressure Homogenizers. Eng. Life Sci. 2001, 1, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Friberg, S.E.; Corkery, R.W.; Blute, I.A. Phase Inversion Temperature (PIT) Emulsification Process. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2011, 56, 4282–4290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Charcosset, C.; Limayem, I.; Fessi, H. The membrane emulsification process—A review. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2004, 79, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lapez-Montilla, J.C.; Herrera-Morales, P.E.; Pandey, S.; Shah, D.O. Spontaneous emulsification: Mechanisms, physicochemi-cal aspects, modeling, and applications. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2002, 23, 219–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Solans, C.; Morales, D.; Homs, M. Spontaneous emulsification. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 22, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Carneiro, H.C.; Tonon, R.V.; Grosso, C.; Hubinger, M.D. Encapsulation efficiency and oxidative stability of flaxseed oil microencapsulated by spray drying using different combinations of wall materials. J. Food Eng. 2013, 115, 443–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Mishra, M. Overview of Encapsulation and Controlled Release. In Handbook of Encapsulation and Controlled Release; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015; pp. 3–19. [Google Scholar]
  38. Gharsallaoui, A.; Roudaut, G.; Chambin, O.; Voilley, A.; Saurel, R. Applications of spray-drying in microencapsulation of food ingredients: An overview. Food Res. Int. 2007, 40, 1107–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bakry, A.M.; Abbas, S.; Ali, B.; Majeed, H.; Abouelwafa, M.Y.; Mousa, A.; Liang, L. Microencapsulation of Oils: A Comprehen-sive Review of Benefits, Techniques, and Applications. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2016, 15, 143–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fang, Z.; Bhandari, B. Spray drying, freeze drying and related processes for food ingredient and nutraceutical encapsulation. In Encapsulation Technologies and Delivery Systems for Food Ingredients and Nutraceuticals; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 73–109. [Google Scholar]
  41. Mori, C.; Kadota, K.; Tozuka, Y.; Shimosaka, A.; Yoshida, M.; Shirakawa, Y. Application of nozzleless electrostatic atomiza-tion to encapsulate soybean oil with solid substances. J. Food Eng. 2019, 246, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Keogh, M. Spray-Dried Microencapsulated Fat Powders. In Food Plant Economics; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005; pp. 477–483. [Google Scholar]
  43. Anandharamakrishnan, C.; Ishwarya, S.P. Spray Drying Techniques for Food Ingredient Encapsulation; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  44. Rezvankhah, A.; Emam-Djomeh, Z.; Askari, G. Encapsulation and delivery of bioactive compounds using spray and freeze-drying techniques: A review. Dry. Technol. 2019, 38, 235–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Haseley, P.; Oetjen, G.-W. Foundations and Process Engineering. In Freeze-Drying, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  46. Garcia-Amezquita, L.E.; Welti-Chanes, J.; Vergara-Balderas, F.T.; Bermúdez-Aguirre, D. Freeze-drying: The Basic Process. In Encyclopedia of Food and Health; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  47. Desobry, S.A.; Netto, F.M.; Labuza, T.P. Comparison of spray drying, drum drying and freeze drying for β-carotene encapsulation and preservation. J. Food Sci. 1997, 62, 1158–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bora, A.F.M.; Li, X.; Zhu, Y.; Du, L. Improved Viability of Microencapsulated Probiotics in a Freeze-Dried Banana Powder during Storage and Under Simulated Gastrointestinal Tract. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2018, 11, 1330–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Desai, K.G.H.; Park, H.J. Recent Developments in Microencapsulation of Food Ingredients. Dry. Technol. 2005, 23, 1361–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shahidi, F.; Han, X. Encapsulation of food ingredients. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1993, 33, 501–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Can Karaca, A.; Low, N.; Nickerson, M. Encapsulation of flaxseed oil using a benchtop spray-dryer for legume pro-tein-maltodextrin microcapsule preparation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 5148–5155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kinyanjui, T.; Artz, W.; Mahungu, S. EMULSIFIERS|Organic Emulsifiers. In Encyclopedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition; Elsevier BV: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003; pp. 2070–2077. [Google Scholar]
  53. Rosen, M.J.; Kunjappu, J.T. Surfactants and Interfacial Phenomena, 4th ed.; John Wiley & SonsJohn Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  54. Nabilah, A.; Handayani, S.; Setiasih, S.; Rahayu, D.U.C.; Hudiyono, S. Emulsifier and antimicrobial activity against Propi-onibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus epidermidis of oxidized fatty acid esters from hydrolyzed castor oil. In IOP Con-ference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  55. Yang, X.; Li, S.; Yan, J.; Xia, J.; Huang, L.; Li, M.; Ding, H.; Xu, L. Effect of different combinations of emulsifier and wall materials on physical properties of spray-dried microencapsulated swida wilsoniana oil. J. Bioresour. Bioprod. 2020, 5, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Thirundas, R.; Gadhe, K.S.; Syed, I.H. Optimization of Wall Material Concentration in Preparation of Flaxseed Oil Powder Using Response Surface Methodology. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2012, 38, 889–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Barroso, A.K.M.; Pierucci, A.P.T.R.; Freitas, S.P.; Torres, A.G.; Da Rocha-Leão, M.H.M. Oxidative stability and sensory eval-uation of microencapsulated flaxseed oil. J. Microencapsul. 2014, 31, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Onsaard, E.; Onsaard, W. Microencapsulated Vegetable Oil Powder. In Microencapsulation–Processes, Technologies and Industrial Applications; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  59. Mourtzinos, I.; Biliaderis, C.G. Principles and applications of encapsulation technologies to food materials. In Thermal and Nonthermal Encapsulation Methods; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  60. Mohseni, F.; Goli, S.A.H. Encapsulation of flaxseed oil in the tertiary conjugate of oxidized tannic acid-gelatin and flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum) mucilage. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 140, 959–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kaushik, P.; Dowling, K.; McKnight, S.; Barrow, C.J.; Adhikari, B. Microencapsulation of flaxseed oil in flaxseed protein and flaxseed gum complex coacervates. Food Res. Int. 2016, 86, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Quispe-Condori, S.; Saldaña, M.D.; Temelli, F. Microencapsulation of flax oil with zein using spray and freeze drying. LWT 2011, 44, 1880–1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Tonon, R.V.; Pedro, R.B.; Grosso, C.; Hubinger, M.D. Microencapsulation of Flaxseed Oil by Spray Drying: Effect of Oil Load and Type of Wall Material. Dry. Technol. 2012, 30, 1491–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Avramenko, N.A.; Chang, C.; Low, N.H.; Nickerson, M.T. Encapsulation of flaxseed oil within native and modified lentil protein-based microcapsules. Food Res. Int. 2016, 81, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Goyal, A.; Sharma, V.; Sihag, M.K.; Tomar, S.K.; Arora, S.; Sabikhi, L.; Singh, A.K. Development and physico-chemical characteri-zation of microencapsulated flaxseed oil powder: A functional ingredient for omega-3 fortification. Powder Technol. 2015, 286, 527–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Tonon, R.V.; Grosso, C.R.F.; Hubinger, M.D. Influence of emulsion composition and inlet air temperature on the microen-capsulation of flaxseed oil by spray-drying. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 282–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Fioramonti, S.A.; Stepanic, E.M.; Tibaldo, A.M.; Pavón, Y.L.; Santiago, L.G. Spray dried flaxseed oil powdered microcapsules obtained using milk whey proteins-alginate double layer emulsions. Food Res. Int. 2019, 119, 931–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Fioramonti, S.A.; Rubiolo, A.C.; Santiago, L.G. Characterisation of freeze-dried flaxseed oil microcapsules obtained by mul-tilayer emulsions. Powder Technol. 2017, 319, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Bajaj, P.R.; Bhunia, K.; Kleiner, L.; Melito, H.S.J.; Smith, D.; Ganjyal, G.; Sablani, S. Improving functional properties of pea protein isolate for microencapsulation of flaxseed oil. J. Microencapsul. 2017, 34, 218–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Tontul, I.; Topuz, A. Influence of emulsion composition and ultrasonication time on flaxseed oil powder properties. Powder Technol. 2014, 264, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Domian, E.; Brynda-Kopytowska, A.; Marzec, A. Functional Properties and Oxidative Stability of Flaxseed Oil Microencap-sulated by Spray-drying Using Legume Proteins in Combination with Soluble Fiber or Trehalose. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2017, 10, 1374–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Pedro, R.B.; Tonon, R.V.; Hubinger, M.D. Effect of Oil Concentration on the Microencapsulation of Flaxseed Oil By Spray-drying. In Jornadas Internacionais Sobre Avanços na Tecnologia de Filmes e Coberturas Funcionais em Alimentos, 3, 2011; Unicamp: Campinas, Brazil, 2011; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Different types of ω-3 and ω-6 fatty acids present in flaxseed oil (self-developed, the concept was adopted from [5]).
Figure 1. Different types of ω-3 and ω-6 fatty acids present in flaxseed oil (self-developed, the concept was adopted from [5]).
Processes 09 00295 g001
Figure 2. Applications of flaxseed oil in different food matrixes and biopharmaceuticals for the prevention of different diseases (self-developed, the concept was adopted from [5,9,10,11,12,13]).
Figure 2. Applications of flaxseed oil in different food matrixes and biopharmaceuticals for the prevention of different diseases (self-developed, the concept was adopted from [5,9,10,11,12,13]).
Processes 09 00295 g002
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the spray-drying process (self-developed, the concept was adopted from [39,40]).
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the spray-drying process (self-developed, the concept was adopted from [39,40]).
Processes 09 00295 g003
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the freeze-drying process (self-developed, the concept was adopted from [39,46]). Reproduced with permission from [46]. Copyright Elsevier, 2016.
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the freeze-drying process (self-developed, the concept was adopted from [39,46]). Reproduced with permission from [46]. Copyright Elsevier, 2016.
Processes 09 00295 g004
Table 1. Summary of different emulsification technologies.
Table 1. Summary of different emulsification technologies.
Emulsification TechniquesDescriptionReference
High-Energy Consuming MethodsUltrasound generatorDue to the ultrasound (physical shear force), fine droplets are created. At a certain range of sound, a source pressure amplitude cavitation takes place and emulsification of the immiscible liquids occurs.[30]
High pressure homogenizerIn a homogenizer, with the help of a pump the liquid is pressed with high pressure to a narrow channel, which offers shear force on immersible liquids. It creates cavitation and leads to emulsion with a small droplet size.[31]
Low-Energy TechniquesPhase inversion temperatureDue to the change in factors, such as temperature or pH, the activity of the emulsifier in terms of its hydrophilic—lipophilic balance is affected. It helps create the emulsion.[32]
Membrane emulsificationMembrane emulsification is performed with the porous membrane. Hydrophilic liquid (oil) in a dispersed phase is pressed through the membrane pores to a continuous phase, generally hydrophilic liquid and the emulsion is formed in a continuous phase.[33]
Spontaneous emulsificationIn spontaneous emulsification, the immiscible liquids, such as oil and water along with the emulsifier create the emulsion without an external energy source.[34,35]
Table 2. Characteristics of the matrix used for the microencapsulation of flaxseed oil.
Table 2. Characteristics of the matrix used for the microencapsulation of flaxseed oil.
MatrixSourceCharacteristicsAdvantagesDisadvantagesReference
Gum ArabicExtracted from Acacia senegal (L.) or Acacia seyal (L.).1. It is a mixture of polysaccharides, oligosaccharides, and glycoproteins.
2. Hydrolysis of polysaccharides produce arabinose, galactose, rhamnose, and glucuronic acid.
3. It is soluble in water.
1. Well accepted film-forming ability.
2. It has an emulsifying property due to the presence of protein.
3. Low viscosity in aqueous solution.
4. Stable in aqueous emulsion.
5. High solubility in aqueous solution.
6. Good retention of flavour.
1. Expensive.
2. Variable availability and quality.
3. Limited potentiality to prevent oxidation of the encapsulated item.
[40,43]
MaltodextrinEnzymatically derived from corn (Zea mays), potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), rice (Oryza sativa), and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) starches. Maltodextrin consists of D-glucose, linked with α(1→4) glycosidic bond. Maltodextrin can be of variable length according to the degree of polymerization. Typically, it varies from 3 to 17 glucose units. Maltodextrins are classified according to the dextrose equivalent. The higher value of dextrose equivalent signifies a shorter glucose chain, higher solubility, higher sweetness, and lower heat resistance.1. Low cost.
2. High potentiality to prevent oxidation of the encapsulated item.
3. Easily digestible in the intestine.
4. Highly soluble in water.
5. Low viscosity with a high solid content in the emulsion.
6. Heat resistance.
1. Poor emulsifying property.
2. Poor flavour retention.
3. Sometimes offer allergenic activity.
[43]
Modified starchNative starch is collected from corn (Zea mays), potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), rice (Oryza sativa), and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) starches.It is prepared by physical, enzymatic, or chemical treatment of native starch, which changes according to the property of the native starch.1. Well soluble in water.
2. Low viscosity.
3. Excellent volatile compound retention.
4. Excellent emulsifying property.
5. Provide stability in emulsion.
6. Heat stable.
7. Odourless and tasteless.
8. Low cost.
Provide allergenicity to food due to the presence of gluten.[37,40,43]
Methyl celluloseMethyl cellulose is not present in the plant cell wall. After the collection of natural cellulose from the plant cell wall, methyl cellulose is produced by the heat treatment of native cellulose with a sodium hydroxide solution and treating with methyl chloride.Different types of methyl cellulose are produced by the substitution of different numbers of the hydroxyl group. It has an amphiphilic property.1. Stable viscosity over a wide range of pH (pH 3–11).
2. Heat stable.
3. Odourless and tasteless.
4. High emulsifying property due to its amphiphilic structure.
5. Satisfactory film-forming ability.
Low solubility with a higher degree of polymerization.[37,50]
Whey proteinDairy milk 1. Whey protein is a mixture of α-lactalbumin (molecular weight: 14.2 kDa, isoelectric point: 4.2), β-globulin (molecular weight: 18.3 kDa, isoelectric point: 5.2–5.4), serum albumin (molecular weight: 66 kDa, isoelectric point: 4.9–5.1), lactoperoxidase (molecular weight: 78 kDa, isoelectric point: 9.6), lactoferrin (molecular weight: 78 kDa, isoelectric point: 8), immunoglobulin G (molecular weight: 150 kDa, isoelectric point: 6.5–9.5), immunoglobulin A (molecular weight: 320 kDa, isoelectric point: 4.5–6.5), and immunoglobulin M (molecular weight: 900 kDa, isoelectric point: 4.5–6.5).
2. All whey proteins may denature with the heat treatment ~70 °C for 20 min, but do not aggregate due to renneting or acidification of milk.
1. High solubility in aqueous solution.
2. Satisfactory film-forming ability.
3. Efficient to protect from oxidation.
4. Good emulsifying property due to its amphiphilic structure.
1. Coagulate at lower pH of the emulsion.
2. Heat sensitive.
3. Provide allergenicity to food.
[43]
Sodium caseinateDairy milk Casein is a phospho protein. Different types of casein proteins, such as αs1-casein, αs2-casein, β-casein, and κ-casein are present in the casein fraction of milk. Casein is produced by the neutralisation of acid precipitated casein with sodium hydroxide. 1. Highly soluble in aqueous solution.
2. Good film-forming ability.
3. High denaturation temperature.
4. Good emulsifying property due to the presence of hydrophilic and hydrophobic amino acids in the protein structure.
1. Coagulate at a lower pH of the emulsion.
2. Provide allergenicity to food.
[43]
Vegetable proteins, such as lentil, chickpea, flaxseed, soy, pea proteins, etc.Proteins from lentil (Lens culinaris), chickpea (Cicer arietinum), flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum), soybean (Glycine max), pea (Pisum sativum).Proteins from different plant sources have a unique amino acid sequence. Due to that, they offer a variety of biochemical activities. 1. Inexpensive and available throughout the year.
2. Highly soluble in aqueous solution.
3. Good film-forming ability.
4. Efficient to protect from oxidation.
5. Good emulsifying property due to its amphiphilic structure.
1. Coagulate at a lower pH of the emulsion.
2. Heat sensitive.
3. Some vegetable proteins, such as chickpea and soy-based proteins may provide allergenicity to the food product.
[37,40,51]
Table 3. Process conditions for producing the encapsulated flaxseed oil and their biochemical characterization.
Table 3. Process conditions for producing the encapsulated flaxseed oil and their biochemical characterization.
ProcessWall Material (Matrix)Oil ContentEmulsifierParticle SizeEncapsulation Efficiency (%)Moisture Content %Oxidative StabilityReferences
Bench top spray-dryerCombination of chickpea protein isolate and maltodextrin10%-16.3–24.0 μm88.723.66–4.07Peroxide value 6.68–7.31 meq active O2/kg for the chickpea protein isolate.[51]
15%86.69
20%83.62
Combination of lentil protein isolate and maltodextrin10%21.0–26.1 μm90.423.65–4.12Peroxide value 6.62–6.86 meq active O2/kg for the lentil protein isolate.
15%87.89
20%85.61
Spray-dryingCombination of whey protein isolate, methyl cellulose, maltodextrin, gum Arabic, and soya lecithin>20%Soya lecithin10–50 μm~901.8–3.1Rancimat induction period after 10 months (h) for gum Arabic + soya lecithin: 5.9 ± 0.1, gum Arabic + maltodextrin + soya lecithin: 2.8 ± 0.1, gum Arabic + maltodextrin + whey protein isolate + soya lecithin: 6.8 ± 0.3.[13]
Coacervation, Spray-drying, Freeze-dryingFlaxseed gum, Flaxseed protein isolateOil-to-wall ratios 1:2, 1:3, and 1:4-For liquid microcapsules 90–130 μmMaximum value 87.60 by spray-drying and 67.06 by freeze-drying.For spray-drying
3.20–3.70 and for freeze-drying
4.18–4.47.
Peroxidase value (meq active O2/kg) after 30 days are 2.85–5.52 for spray-drying and 3.25–8.72 for freeze-drying.[61]
Spray-dryingCombination of maltodextrin and gum Arabic14 and 20%-17.6–23.1 μmThe highest encapsulation efficiency was achieved with 14% oil. 54.6–90.7.-Induction time 2.83  ±  0.62 h, oxidative stability index 3.78 h for 14% oil.[12]
Spray-dryingCombination of maltodextrin, whey protein concentrate, gum Arabic, modified starch, 100 Hi-Cap20%-Droplet diameter: 0.6–26 μmThe lowest value obtained for maltodextrin and whey protein concentrate is 62.3–95.7.1–3%Peroxidase value (meq peroxide/kg oil) after 4 weeks for gum Arabic + maltodextrin: 138, modified starch + maltodextrin 138, Hi-Cap + maltodextrin: 124, whey protein concentrate + maltodextrin: 107.[36]
Spray-drying, Freeze-dryingZein---For spray-drying 93.26  ±  0.95 and for freeze-drying 59.63 ± 0.36.For spray-drying
3.49–5.06 and freeze-drying
4.94–5.33.
-[62]
Spray-drying
  • Gum Arabic
  • Whey protein concentrate
  • Modified starch
  • Hi-Cap 100
10%
20%
30%
40%
-0.24–180 μmEmulsions prepared with modified starch had the highest encapsulation efficiency, whereas emulsion prepared with whey protein concentrate had lowest encapsulation efficiency. 37–97.For whey protein concentrate 0.36–0.78, for gum Arabic 0.89–1.74, for modified starch
0.19–0.53; Hi-Cap 100.
Peroxidase value (meg peroxide/kg oil) for modified starch.
Hi-Cap 100 is 0.5–1.8, 3.1–4 for gum Arabic and 1.3–2 for whey protein concentrate.
[63]
Freeze-dryingCombination of lentil protein isolates and maltodextrin10, 20, 30%-4.2–6.7 μmHighest encapsulation efficiency ~62.8.<6.0%Peroxide value on day 30 for 4.0% native lentil protein isolates + 36% maltodextrin + 10% oil 25.57 and 14.75 meq of active O2/kg for free oil and entrapped oils, respectively.[64]
Spray-dryingCombination of whey proteins concentrate, sodium caseinate, lactose and ascorbyl palmitate12.5%-0.54–70.6 μm86.77–84.51%3.88–3.98Peroxide value after 6 months varied from 0.81 to 0.99 meq peroxides/kg.[65]
Spray-dryingModified starch30%-0.5–100 μm90.9%3.5%Induction period of the microcapsules exceeded 50 h for all times.[57]
Spray-dryingCombination of gum Arabic, maltodextrin, skimmed milk powder, and Tween 808–22%Tween 80-70–86%3.2–4.8%Peroxide value varied from 1–1.28 meq/kg.[56]
Spray-dryingGum Arabic10–30%-0.1–477 μm51–92%-Peroxide value 0.017–0.106 meq peroxide/kg oil.[66]
Spray driedCombination of whey protein concentrate, sodium alginate, and maltodextrin4.5–5%-1–10 μm30.69–84.39%-Peroxidase value (meq/kg oil) 3.46–6.84.[67]
Freeze-dryingCombination of whey protein isolate, maltodextrin, and low density sodium alginate10% -27.01–95.44%-Peroxide value for the emulsion with 20.24 total solids content (g/100 g emulsion) was increased from 1.5 to 46.5 meq/kg oil after freeze-drying.[68]
Freeze-dryingCombination of tertiary conjugate of gelatin, flaxseed mucilage, and oxidized tannic acid15, 30, and 50%-->90%-Peroxide value increased from 3.0–5.3 meqO2/kg.[60]
Spray-dryingCombination of maltodextrin and pea protein isolate20% and 40%-Particle size distribution ~24 μmFor 20% oil 35.2–95.6% and for 40% oil 22.3–93.6%.--[69]
Spray-dryingCombination of maltodextrin and whey protein concentrate20%-5.47–7.09 µmRanged between 81.3–95.3%3.16–4.91% (weight basis)-[70]
Spray-dryingDifferent combinations of soy protein isolate, pea protein isolate, wheat dextrin soluble fiber, and trehalose35%-Mean diameter of particles 18–40 μmMicrocapsules with the protein-trehalose matrix 98–94%. Microcapsules with the protein-soluble fiber matrix 81–62%.1.5–2.3%Peroxide value of microencapsulated oil before storage: 1.80–7.90 meqO2/kg and after 12 weeks 4–27 meqO2/kg.[71]
Spray-dryingGum Arabic10% Droplets mean diameter 1.854 μm~92%-Peroxide value ~0.032 meq/kg oil.[72]
20% Droplets mean diameter 2.191 μm~75%Peroxide value ~0.036 meq/kg oil.
30% Droplets mean diameter 2.479 μm~52%Peroxide value ~0.036 meq/kg oil.
40% Droplets mean diameter 3.464 μm~40%Peroxide value ~0.04 meq/kg oil.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yakdhane, A.; Labidi, S.; Chaabane, D.; Tolnay, A.; Nath, A.; Koris, A.; Vatai, G. Microencapsulation of Flaxseed Oil—State of Art. Processes 2021, 9, 295. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9020295

AMA Style

Yakdhane A, Labidi S, Chaabane D, Tolnay A, Nath A, Koris A, Vatai G. Microencapsulation of Flaxseed Oil—State of Art. Processes. 2021; 9(2):295. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9020295

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yakdhane, Asma, Sabrine Labidi, Donia Chaabane, Anita Tolnay, Arijit Nath, András Koris, and Gyula Vatai. 2021. "Microencapsulation of Flaxseed Oil—State of Art" Processes 9, no. 2: 295. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9020295

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop