1. Introduction
To reduce the environmental impact of huge energy-use in industry, companies continue to devote their efforts to using renewable energy. Among the various renewable energies, solar energy has received the most attention as a promising process application [
1]. Solar energy is the most abundant renewable and the cleanest source of energy. Solar energy conversion technology is divided into PV (Solar photovoltaic energy) technology, CSP (Concentrating Solar Power) technology and STC (Solar Thermal Collectors for heating and cooling) technology.
Much progress has been made in PV technology and the CSP technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions in the power generation sector, which is responsible for a very high fraction of fossil fuel consumption so far. Recently, there is a growing interest in the STC technology in order to produce medium- and low-temperature energy that is applied to processes below 300 °C, such as gas preheating in coal power plant and refinery industries, as well as primary and secondary industries (agriculture, chemical and paper) [
2]. The STC technology for utilizing solar energy consists mainly of a solar collection technology for collecting sunlight such as conventional flat plate, parabolic dish and Fresnel lens, and a receiver technology for transferring collected sunlight to an energy carrier. The solar collectors have been continuously developed to improve efficiency; it has recently been found that the performance of a simple flat collector can be greatly improved by optimized configuration with a flat booster bottom reflector [
3]. The receiver system can be divided into a direct irradiation method and an indirect irradiation method. The most commonly used method is to indirectly heat the tube for heating the salt or vapor in the tube or to heat the vapor or gas in the transparent tube irradiated with sunlight. However, the indirect receiver system may have low heat transfer efficiency due to high resistance in heat transfer. The direct irradiation to water vapor or gas also has a difficulty in efficiently transferring the energy because of the ability of the medium to absorb heat [
4].
Thus, there is a growing interest in a fluidized bed particle receiver that directly irradiates sunlight to particles in the fluidized bed, because it has good heat transfer characteristics due to smooth mixing between fluidized particles and gas [
5]. Many studies have been conducted to develop the fluidized bed particle receiver and the particles for thermochemical heat storage for the CSP applications [
6,
7,
8]. However, there have been relatively few studies on the gas heating using this system for the STC application. Although both applications use the principle of fluidized bed, the direct solar heat transfer to energy storage particles is important in the CPS applications, while the heat transfer of absorbed energy in the solid to the gas is also very important [
1,
4]. Thus, the study on particle behavior as an energy transfer medium in the gas–solid fluidized bed is an important part of the STC field.
The thermal efficiency of the fluidized bed particle receiver is strongly influenced by the physical properties of the particles at a given operating temperature [
9,
10]. It has been found that an optimal particle size is ranged between 500 and 1000 μm in mean size diameter for the fluidized bed receiver [
7]. However, it is expected that the size depends on the operating temperature [
7]. So far, most studies on the effect of particle properties have been carried out in the receiver at high temperature over 600 °C, and the research in the medium and low temperature region below 300 °C is relatively sparse. [
1,
7] Moreover, many studies have been conducted using xenon lamps as a heat source in the simulated indoor space, not the outdoor environment [
8,
11,
12].
In this study, thermal performance experiments were carried out in a directly-irradiated fluidized bed of different particles in the outdoor environment for the application of gas heating. The effect of SiC particle size on the thermal efficiency of the preheater has been determined.
2. Experimental
Experiments were carried out in a solar energy particle receiver system as in
Figure 1. The fluidized bed gas heating system has two parts such as a solar collector and a particle receiver. The solar collector system consists of two reflective mirrors (model 1100, 3 M) with reflectance of 93%, Fresnel lens (effective ID = 457 mm, Edmund optics) and focal lens. The first reflective mirror was installed in front of the Fresnel lens in order to chase the direct sunlight of the moving sun as in
Figure 1a. The Fresnel lens has a light transmittance of 92%. The solar power meter (Procal1333R, TES) was installed on the Fresnel lens, which faces the first reflective mirror to measure the directly nominal irradiance supplied into the fluidized bed through the Fresnel lens. It was checked periodically whether the light intensity changed in radial direction across the Fresnel lens.
The fluidized bed particle receiver was made of Pyrex glass and has a main column (50 mm-ID × 100 mm high) as shown in
Figure 1b. The main column has the enlarged top section (110 mm-ID) to reduce the particles’ elutriation. A highly transparent quartz plate is located at the top surface of the column to get high transmittance for light irradiation. The air as a fluidizing-gas was introduced into the column through a distributor via a mass flow meter (RK1150, Kojima instrument, Kyotanabe Kyoto, Japan). A distributor of sintered plate type was used to inject the air. Pressure drops across the bed were measured at two pressure taps, which were located at column wall around the inlet and outlet to get the information of solid holdup. A total of 5 thermocouples (K-type) were installed to measure the temperatures of inlet air, outlet air and bed particles.
Two kinds of silicon carbide (SiC) particles, a good absorber of the radiation, were adopted as bed materials to investigate the effect of the particle diameter. The physical properties of the SiC particles are shown in
Table 1. They have almost the same particle density but different mean particle diameter and size distribution (PSD) based on sieve analysis as shown in
Figure 2a. The fine SiC particles (F220, Showa denko, Tokyo, Japan) have the particle mean diameter of 0.052 mm and the apparent particle density of 2992 kg/m
3, corresponding to the Geldart A group based on Geldart classification [
13]. The coarse SiC particles (F100, Showa denko, Tokyo, Japan) have the particle mean diameter of 0.123 mm and the apparent particle density of 3015 kg/m
3, corresponding to the Geldart B group [
13].
In comparison of the PSD (
Figure 2a), the fine SiC has 25.2 wt% of of fine particles less than 45 microns (F
45), but the coarse SiC has no F
45. The static bed height was 45 mm with the bed materials of 120 g. The solar irradiation was concentrated by the Fresnel lens, and the light was directed toward the surface of the SiC particles in the fluidized bed at given gas velocity, as in
Figure 1d. The focal area of the light on the particle bed surface is about 1257 mm
2. The gas velocity was in the range of 0–0.11 m/s. The experiment was performed in an outdoor steady state [
15]. The air was injected from a compressor and maintained at a constant temperature. Tests were carried out after determining steady state that the air outlet temperature from the particle receiver is constant under the condition where the solar intensity did not change significantly for a certain period.
3. Results and Discussion
It is very important to obtain the minimum fluidization velocity (U
mf) for determining the optimal operating condition of the particle receiver considering the gas–solid behavior in the fluidized bed [
8].
Figure 3 shows variations of the pressure drop across the bed with varying gas velocity for determining the U
mf. The pressure drop across the fixed bed increases linearly due to the increase in kinetic energy loss and friction loss with the increasing of the gas velocity through the voidage in the bed. The pressure drop then reaches a constant value that is approximately equal to the weight of the bed material, meaning that all of the bed materials are fluidized. As shown in the
Figure 3, the U
mf is determined from the intersection of two pressure drop change lines with different slopes [
8,
16]. From
Figure 3, the U
mf of fine SiC particles is about 0.006 m/s. The coarse particle U
mf is 0.017 m/s, which is about three times as high as that of fine particle U
mf. It is believed that the system with fine SiC particles is capable of operating in the fluidized bed at a lower gas velocity range. In addition, it is more likely that higher gas temperatures can be achieved compared to the coarse SiC bed due to sufficient fluidized bed–gas contact time at lower gas velocities and larger specific surface area of the particles.
The performance of the solar energy system depends strongly on the weather, so it is necessary to measure the reachable temperature of the system and to analyze the system feasibility and thermal efficiency based on the results of the temperature variation. The effect of gas velocity on temperatures of bed and outlet gas in the fluidized bed receiver is shown in
Figure 4. In this study, the temperature of the bed material was measured at a location of 60% of the total bed height, which is 2 cm below the surface exposed to solar light. Fine SiC particles showed higher temperature than coarse particles. However, the comparison of the results between the particles is not meaningful here, because the obtainable temperature in the receiver depends on the weather condition at the measurement date [
17].
Figure 4 shows well the difference in the direct normal irradiance (DNI) values, which is the amount of solar radiation received per unit area, due to the different experiment dates of the two particles. The outlet gas temperature of both particles was lower than the bed temperature at low gas velocity, indicating a heat loss through the light transmission window at the top of the reactor (
Figure 1d). However, as the gas velocity increases, the heat absorption amount increases and the residence time of the gas in the freeboard decreases so that the outlet gas temperature approaches the bed temperature. The bed temperature and outlet gas temperature showed maximum values with variation of the gas velocity, because the particle behavior in the fluidized bed is strongly affected by the bubbles’ formation and their motion in the bed. More specifically, the formation of gas bubbles in the fluidized bed and the upward flow of the bubbles give flywheel effect in the fluidized bed, giving better mixing and convective heat transfer effects of the gas-particles in the whole fluidized bed [
18]. A gulf streaming in the bed with downflow of emulsion at the center is induced by the uneven rising bubbles with the increase in gas velocity [
13,
19], enhancing the mixing of the hot particles on the bed surface with the other region of the bed and making the temperature distribution in the whole bed uniform.
The bubble fraction increases with further increasing of the gas velocity, resulting in increased direct heat transfer efficiency of the particles to gas due to the vigorous mixing in the bed. The outlet gas temperature also increases with the increase in heat transfer efficiency. However, the temperature also decreases with the further increase in gas velocity due to an increase in contacting resistance between the gas in enlarged bubble and the particles, and a reduction in the gas residence-time in the bed of the reactor [
18]. In the comparison of the particles, the maximum value was found at 3.6 times of U
mf (3.6 times of minimum fluidization velocity) for fine SiC, and the maximum at less than 2.0 times of U
mf for coarse particles. The maximum value at different U
mf numbers is due to the different fluidization characteristics between the two particles. Coarse SiC belonging to Geldart group B showed a maximum temperature at the initial stage due to the immediate generation of bubbles after the U
mf, whereas fine SiC belonging to the Geldart group A generally produces bubbles at 2–3 times of U
mf, resulting in the maximum temperature appearing relatively late [
20]. Interestingly, the fine SiC exhibited a peculiar phenomenon where the outlet gas temperature was higher than the bed temperature, unlike the coarse SiC, with further increase in the gas velocity above 0.023 m/s. This is because the fine SiC with high contents of fines (F
45: particles less than 45 μm [
16]) are easily entrained upward at a high gas velocity [
16], resulting in further heat transfers to the gas in the expanded column. The coarse SiC with a relatively small amount of fines showed similar bed and outlet gas temperatures as the gas velocity increased.
An analysis in viewpoint of dimensionless temperature with height is important for understanding thermal performance of reactor design. [
21]. In order to examine the relation between the particle behavior in the bed and the thermal performance of the reactor, this study introduces a dimensionless temperature variation as
Figure 5 shows variations of the dimensionless temperature (T*) with gas velocity and fluidization number (U
g/U
mf). An ideal fluidized bed heat exchanger has 1.0 of the T* where bed and outlet temperatures are the same. The dimensionless temperature was higher than 1.0 at low gas velocity and decreased below 1.0 with increasing gas velocity. A value above 1.0 at low gas velocities means that the gas absorbed heat from the bed material as it passed through the fluidized bed, but the temperature of the gas was lowered due to heat loss through the solar-transmission window above the bed surface (
Figure 1d). This means that the control of heat loss in the expanded column is more important than that inside the bed to improve thermal performance at low gas velocities. However, the T* reached 1.0 at a certain gas velocity, which means that enhanced gas–solid heat transfer occurred over heat loss through the window. Interestingly, the system showed that both particles reached 1.0 at the fluidization number of about 4.5 times of U
mf, as shown in
Figure 5b, where the fluidization number corresponds to the velocity as the gas starts to rise homogeneously through the bed [
22]. The fine SiC having large amounts of easily entrained fines exhibits a relatively low T* at a high gas velocity compared to coarse SiC, confirming that the additional heat transfer in the freeboard region has a greater effect on the overall heat transfer. Therefore, it is considered that control of heat-transfer inside the bed, such as bubble size control, becomes more important at high gas velocity.
Figure 6 shows an impact of gas velocity on heat absorption by gas in the particle receiver. The heat energy is obtained by Equation (2) as
where, Q
gas is heat energy per unit time of the gas, ρ
gas is gas density, A is reactor area, and C
p,gas is the heat capacity of the gas. The heat absorption from the receiver increased as gas velocity increased. As mentioned earlier, the increase in gas velocity increases the mixing of the bed materials in the fluidized bed and the temperature uniformity in the bed due to the increases in bubble frequency [
18]. Eventually, this increases the direct gas–solid heat transfer rate, thereby increasing the amount of energy delivered to the gas. The heat transfer rate and thus the exit gas temperature slightly decrease as the bubble fraction increases with further increase in the gas velocity, but the resulting amount of heat absorption increases due to the increased amount of injected air. In this study, maximum 18 W with fine SiC and 23 W with coarse SiC were obtained within the experimental range. The fine SiC were also expected to obtain higher amounts of heat absorption through additional heat transfer by the entrained fines in the freeboard region as the gas velocity increases, but the increase in the fines entrainment to exit region causes an excessive release of particles, thus limiting the experimental range in the current system. It will be possible to improve this by installing particle recovery systems such as internal cyclones [
13,
23]. On the other hand, coarse SiC particles without the fines could obtain higher amounts of energy through operation at higher flow rates.
In order to calibrate the daylight difference or DNI variation between test dates as in
Figure 6, the thermal efficiency comparison of the receiver is shown in
Figure 7. The thermal efficiency is obtained by Equations (3) and (4) as
where, η
thermal is energy efficiency of the system, Q
solar is solar energy per time obtained by the solar collector system, I
DNI is intensity of direct normal irradiance, A
Fresnel is Fresnel lens area, ρ
mirror is reflectance of the second reflect mirror, τ
l is transmittance of lens, and τ
quartz is transmittance of transparent quartz plate. The thermal efficiency increased with an increase in gas velocity due to the increased heat transfer in the bed by the increased bubble fraction. Maximum thermal efficiencies of 14% for fine SiC and 20% for coarse SiC were obtained within the experimental range. These are relatively low values compared to the previous report, caused by a large heat loss out of the system in the field [
24]. In comparison of the two particles, the fine SiC showed higher thermal efficiency than the coarse SiC when compared at the same gas velocity (dotted box in
Figure 7). This is the opposite of what is reported in the high temperature receiver [
9,
10]. In this receiver, the high thermal performance of the fine SiC is caused by the particle properties and its behavior such as large specific area and small heat transfer resistance due to small bubble, which are characteristics of Geldart A group particles [
20]. However, the energy efficiency of the fine SiC particles did not show a significant increase compared to the coarse SiC, contrary to expectations based on the hydrodynamic behavior of the particles shown in
Figure 4 and
Figure 5. This unexpected result is due to the difference in fines content (F
45) of SiC particles. Coarse SiC has no F
45, while fine SiC has an F
45 content of 25.2 wt%. The fines below 45 μm in the fluidized bed generally serve as additives to aid fluidization, such as lubricants, between particles in the fluidized bed [
16]. However, it was observed that the fines are easily entrained at low gas velocity [
25] and attached to the solar light-transmission plate by van der Waals force [
26,
27,
28] as shown in
Figure 8a. This lowers the light transmissivity of the sunlight collected by the Fresnel lens to the receiver, resulting in a lower thermal efficiency of the system. However, the effect of the fines still seems to predominate the positive effect under a certain condition due to the enhanced heat transfer in the freeboard region as shown in a comparative experiment carried out at 0.05 m/s shown in
Figure 8b. Therefore, it is desirable to reduce the content of smaller fines, which easily adhere to the transmission window, in order to further improve the system’s efficiency. Further study is required to define the smaller fines and to optimize the PSD of the bed considering the effects of the opposing effects of the fines.
The design and performance of the fluidized bed heat exchanger has been optimized depending on particle properties and operating conditions such as gas velocity [
29]. The results of this study could thus provide information for further improvement of the solar particle receiver compatible with solar light collecting system. The small particles in the Geldart A group have positive effects such as improved fluidity in the bed and additional heat transfer in the freeboard region in viewpoint of the fluidized bed, but have a negative effect on the light transmittance in viewpoint of the solar system. In addition, the application of an expanded column above the reactor to reduce the amount of particles entrained at high gas velocity has a negative effect of providing heat loss due to the increase in gas residence time in the upper region. Therefore, for further improvement of the system’s thermal efficiency, further studies on the design of the reactor freeboard section that can reduce the gas residence time as well as the optimum particulate content in the Geldart A particles to minimize the negative effects are required [
30]. In addition, an improvement such as a double transmission window will also be required in order to minimize the energy loss through the transmission window in which external insulation is difficult.