Next Article in Journal
Valve Plate Geometry Optimization for Torque Reduction in Continuous-Wave Mud Pulsers: A CFD Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Fouling-Induced Degradation and Pneumoshock Cleaning Strategy for Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchangers in Oil Refining Thermal Management
Previous Article in Journal
An Integrated Adsorption–Regeneration–Distillation–Plasma System for Low-Energy PFAS Remediation with Waste Heat and Solvent Recovery
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exergoeconomic Assessment of a Cogeneration Unit Using Biogas
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Performance Evaluation of a Ship Waste Heat-Driven Freshwater Production System Based on Rotary Dehumidification and Seawater Condensation

1
School of Navigation, Xiamen Ocean Vocational College, Xiamen 361012, China
2
Institute of Marine Engineering, Jimei University, Xiamen 361021, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2026, 14(4), 666; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14040666
Submission received: 10 December 2025 / Revised: 28 January 2026 / Accepted: 12 February 2026 / Published: 14 February 2026

Abstract

This study evaluates integrated shipboard freshwater production and fresh air pretreatment on a 20,000 TEU-class container vessel, addressing its freshwater demand and the inefficient recovery of exhaust waste heat from the main engine. The system integrates rotary dehumidification, seawater condensation, and water purification. A theoretical model was developed to evaluate the system performance, incorporating design, thermodynamic modeling, parameter optimization, and adaptability analyses under various operating conditions. The results indicate that under optimal conditions (seawater at 25 °C, outlet temperature difference of 2 °C), the single-stage system is predicted to produce approximately 1.45 m3 of freshwater per day, meeting 20.7% of the vessel’s freshwater requirement. The auxiliary electrical energy consumption, estimated based on standard engineering correlations, is 1–1.5 kWh/m3, representing a 70–80% reduction compared to conventional reverse osmosis systems (3–6 kWh/m3). The sensitivity coefficient for seawater temperature was −0.334, whereas that for output temperature was −0.167. A two-stage series configuration has the potential to further improve the demand satisfaction rate to 41–61%. Overall, the proposed system enables the cascade utilization of ship waste heat and functional integration of air pretreatment and freshwater production, offering a promising auxiliary engineering solution for energy conservation, emission reduction, and onboard freshwater self-sufficiency in marine applications.
Keywords: ship waste heat utilization; rotary dehumidification; seawater condensation; freshwater production; performance evaluation ship waste heat utilization; rotary dehumidification; seawater condensation; freshwater production; performance evaluation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, G.; Ding, D.; Zhu, Z.; Zheng, G.; Jiao, S. Performance Evaluation of a Ship Waste Heat-Driven Freshwater Production System Based on Rotary Dehumidification and Seawater Condensation. Processes 2026, 14, 666. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14040666

AMA Style

Yang G, Ding D, Zhu Z, Zheng G, Jiao S. Performance Evaluation of a Ship Waste Heat-Driven Freshwater Production System Based on Rotary Dehumidification and Seawater Condensation. Processes. 2026; 14(4):666. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14040666

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Guanghai, Defeng Ding, Ziwen Zhu, Guojie Zheng, and Shilong Jiao. 2026. "Performance Evaluation of a Ship Waste Heat-Driven Freshwater Production System Based on Rotary Dehumidification and Seawater Condensation" Processes 14, no. 4: 666. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14040666

APA Style

Yang, G., Ding, D., Zhu, Z., Zheng, G., & Jiao, S. (2026). Performance Evaluation of a Ship Waste Heat-Driven Freshwater Production System Based on Rotary Dehumidification and Seawater Condensation. Processes, 14(4), 666. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14040666

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop