Next Article in Journal
Transient Pressure Behavior and Interference Mechanisms of Multi-Well Pads in Rectangular Bounded Shale Gas Reservoirs
Next Article in Special Issue
Hierarchical Adjustable Potential Assessment of Electric Vehicles for Transmission–Distribution–Microgrid Coordination
Previous Article in Journal
Prediction of Three-Dimensional In Situ Stress in Deep Coal Rocks Considering Heterogeneity and Physical Information
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multi-Objective Coordinated Scheduling and Trading Strategy for Economy and Security of Source–Grid–Load–Storage Under High Penetration of Renewable Energy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Risk-Averse Generation Maintenance Scheduling for Power Systems Based on Contagious Value-at-Risk

1
State Grid Economic and Technological Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 102200, China
2
Hubei Key Laboratory of Digital Finance Innovation, School of Information Engineering, Hubei Internet Finance Information Engineering Technology Research Center, Hubei University of Economics, Wuhan 430205, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Electromagnetic Technology, School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2026, 14(10), 1536; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14101536
Submission received: 10 March 2026 / Revised: 5 May 2026 / Accepted: 6 May 2026 / Published: 9 May 2026

Abstract

Accurate quantification of uncertainty risks is pivotal for enhancing the reliability of generation maintenance scheduling (GMS) in power systems. However, existing risk quantification methods predominantly focus on the aggregate impact of uncertainty on system-wide operational risks, failing to identify critical risk sources. This limitation hinders the secure and efficient operation of power systems with high penetration of renewable energy. To address this issue, we propose a risk-averse GMS approach for power systems based on contagious value-at-risk (CoVaR). Specifically, we first introduce the CoVaR theory to identify dominant risk sources affecting the secure operation of the system and derive a general analytical expression for CoVaR that incorporates integral terms of uncertain variables. Subsequently, a scenario-based linearization reconstruction strategy is developed to discretize these integral terms, and the complex CoVaR model is reformulated into a computationally tractable mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model. On this basis, a new risk-averse GMS model embedded with CoVaR constraints is constructed. This model achieves precise identification of critical risk sources by quantifying and comparing the impacts of different risk sources on both system operational costs and risk costs. Finally, simulation results on the modified IEEE 24-bus power system and IEEE 118-bus power system demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed approach.
Keywords: generation maintenance scheduling; CoVaR; risk-averse; uncertainty generation maintenance scheduling; CoVaR; risk-averse; uncertainty

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.; Yi, H.; Yang, X.; Cui, S.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, X. Risk-Averse Generation Maintenance Scheduling for Power Systems Based on Contagious Value-at-Risk. Processes 2026, 14, 1536. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14101536

AMA Style

Li Y, Yi H, Yang X, Cui S, Wang X, Liu Y, Zhou X. Risk-Averse Generation Maintenance Scheduling for Power Systems Based on Contagious Value-at-Risk. Processes. 2026; 14(10):1536. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14101536

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Yizheng, Haiqiong Yi, Xiao Yang, Shichang Cui, Xueying Wang, Yihan Liu, and Xinying Zhou. 2026. "Risk-Averse Generation Maintenance Scheduling for Power Systems Based on Contagious Value-at-Risk" Processes 14, no. 10: 1536. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14101536

APA Style

Li, Y., Yi, H., Yang, X., Cui, S., Wang, X., Liu, Y., & Zhou, X. (2026). Risk-Averse Generation Maintenance Scheduling for Power Systems Based on Contagious Value-at-Risk. Processes, 14(10), 1536. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14101536

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop