Next Article in Journal
Mixed Periodic-Classical Barrier Strategies for Lévy Risk Processes
Next Article in Special Issue
How Does Distress Acquisition Incentivized by Government Purchases of Distressed Loans Affect Bank Default Risk?
Previous Article in Journal
An Optimal Investment Strategy for Insurers in Incomplete Markets
Open AccessArticle

Under What Conditions Do Rules-Based and Capability-Based Management Modes Dominate?

1
Agility Insights AG, c/o KD Zug Treuhand AG, Untermüli 7, Postfach 7444, 6302 Zug, Switzerland
2
Health-, Social- and Public Management Department, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Garnisonstrasse 21, A-4020 Linz, Austria
3
Center for Real Estate Studies und VWA Business School, Steinbeis University Berlin, Eisenbahnstraße 56, D-79098 Freiburg, Germany
4
Hixsons Limited, 24 Cecil Avenue, Bournemouth, Dorset BH8 9EJ, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Risks 2018, 6(2), 32; https://doi.org/10.3390/risks6020032
Received: 23 January 2018 / Revised: 22 March 2018 / Accepted: 30 March 2018 / Published: 4 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Risks in Financial and Real Estate Markets)
Despite real changes in the work place and the negative consequences of prevailing hierarchical structures with rigid management systems, little attention has yet been paid to shifting management modes to accommodate the dynamics of the external environment, particularly when a firm’s operating environment demands a high degree of flexibility. Building on the resource-based view as a basis for competitive advantage, we posit that differences in the stability of an organization’s environment and the degree of managerial control explain variations in the management mode used in firms. Unlike other studies which mainly focus on either the dynamics of the external environment or management control, we have developed a theoretical model combining both streams of research, in a context frame to describe under what conditions firms engage in rules-based, change-based, engagement-based and capability-based management modes. To test our theoretical framework, we conducted a survey with 54 firms in various industries and nations on how their organizations cope with a dynamic environment and what management style they used in response. Our study reveals that the appropriate mode can be determined by analyzing purpose, motivation, knowledge and information, as well as the degree of complexity, volatility and uncertainty the firm is exposed to. With our framework, we attempt to advance the understanding of when organizations should adapt their management style to the changing business environment. View Full-Text
Keywords: capabilities; management style; dynamics; change; engagement; VUCA; volatility; uncertainty; complexity capabilities; management style; dynamics; change; engagement; VUCA; volatility; uncertainty; complexity
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Michel, L.; Anzengruber, J.; Wölfle, M.; Hixson, N. Under What Conditions Do Rules-Based and Capability-Based Management Modes Dominate? Risks 2018, 6, 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks6020032

AMA Style

Michel L, Anzengruber J, Wölfle M, Hixson N. Under What Conditions Do Rules-Based and Capability-Based Management Modes Dominate? Risks. 2018; 6(2):32. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks6020032

Chicago/Turabian Style

Michel, Lukas; Anzengruber, Johanna; Wölfle, Marco; Hixson, Nick. 2018. "Under What Conditions Do Rules-Based and Capability-Based Management Modes Dominate?" Risks 6, no. 2: 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks6020032

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop