Next Article in Journal
A Unique Case of Primary Cutaneous Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma Associated with Aplasia Cutis Congenita in a Four-Year-Old Female: A Case Report
Previous Article in Journal
Differential Diagnosis of Histiocytic Necrotizing Lymphadenitis and Malignant Lymphoma with Simple Clinical Findings
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Stress, Inflammation and Metabolic Biomarkers Are Associated with Body Composition Measures in Lean, Overweight, and Obese Children and Adolescents

Children 2022, 9(2), 291; https://doi.org/10.3390/children9020291
by Eirini V. Christaki 1,*, Panagiota Pervanidou 1,2, Ioannis Papassotiriou 3, Despoina Bastaki 2, Eleni Valavani 2, Aimilia Mantzou 1, Giorgos Giannakakis 4,5, Dario Boschiero 6 and George P. Chrousos 1,2,7
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Children 2022, 9(2), 291; https://doi.org/10.3390/children9020291
Submission received: 14 January 2022 / Revised: 12 February 2022 / Accepted: 16 February 2022 / Published: 21 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Global and Public Health)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

It is a very interesting study about a relevant topic.

INTRODUCTION

The hypotheses should be written in a sole paragraph, not written in the first person.

METHODS:

-Add a reference for the anthropometric parameters and the tool used.

-Add a reference for blood sampling.

-Regarding the STAIC questionnaire, try to put all the information in a single paragraph.

-Depending on if the variables are parametric or not, you should use Pearson's correlation test or another test.

RESULTS:

-Please be more consistent with the number of decimals used in table 1. Include the abbreviations.

-Lines 274-277 in the same paragraph there is "as expected" twice.

-The title of Table 2 is not clear enough. Maybe it should be "Comparison between groups......". Include the abbreviations.

-Table 3: include abbreviations, remove de "P=" from the p-value column. Instead of "ns", put the significant results in bold letters or with an *. Il should be consistent between the 3 tables.

DISCUSSION

Instead of "in our study", use "in the present study, in this study...". Same comment on lines 439 and 445

REFERENCES

Some of the references are a bit old. Perhaps you could include some more current citations.

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This is a very interesting paper on relation of obesity, chronic stress and low inflammation in children and adolescents. Although it is a cross-sectional study therefore it cannot talk about causality, the paper is nicely and clearly written, methodology clear and precise. Moreover, results are presented in appropriate and easy-to-follow manner. 

I only have few suggestions for the authors:

Section "Introduction"

  • line 79 to 81 - the sentence is not clear

Section "Results"

  • Table 1 - specify in the table or in the table heading that variables are presented as means with standard deviation

Section "Literature"

  • a big proportion of literature is outdated. I would suggest for the authors to pick or leave only the studies with newer dates if that is possible

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

The Authors have shown that in children, stress, inflammation and metabolic markers and adiposity are inter related. The manuscript is well written and the study is well designed. The tables are clear to understand the results. There are few typo and grammatical error that needs careful revision.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop