Next Article in Journal
Digital Colorimetric Approach for Rapid Determination of Acetaldehyde in Pisco Head During Distillation
Previous Article in Journal
A Simple Benzo[d]thiazole-Based Schiff Base Probe for Selective Fluorometric Detection of Al3+ Ions: Validation Through DFT, Test Strips, Fish Pieces, Cellular Imaging, and Real Water Investigations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Green Strategies and Decision Tools for Sustainability Assessment of Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Sensors: Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Feature Review Papers in Chemical/Bio-Sensors and Analytical Chemistry in 2025

by
Nicole Jaffrezic-Renault
1,* and
Jin-Ming Lin
2
1
Institute of UTINAM, University of Franche-Comté, UMR-CNRS 6213, 16 Gray Road, 25030 Besançon, France
2
Beijing Key Laboratory of Microanalytical Methods and Instrumentation, Department of Chemistry, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Chemosensors 2026, 14(4), 83; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors14040083
Submission received: 21 March 2026 / Accepted: 30 March 2026 / Published: 2 April 2026
This Special Issue, entitled “Feature Review Papers in Chemical/Bio-Sensors and Analytical Chemistry in 2025”, collates 13 review papers that present state-of-the-art findings and future challenges regarding research on gas sensors, chemical sensors, and biosensors.
The first review focuses on chemoresistive humidity sensors [1] and considers the interplay of mechanism–material–application for sensor optimization [2,3,4,5,6,7]. The key challenges for the large-scale development of the sensors are analyzed. The second review explores the promising potential of resistive-based nanostructured CeO2 gas sensors for the detection of toxic gases [8], where methods for improving selectivity and sensitivity, as well as decreasing the working temperature, are described [9,10,11,12]. Electrical and optical biosniffers and their use for monitoring VOCs in medical diagnostics are described in the third review [13], where challenges that must be addressed prior to real-world applications are analyzed: minimizing the effect of temperature and humidity on the signal [14], integrating multisensors [15], and improving data processing [16,17,18,19].
Four review papers that focus on chemical sensors to detect pollutants in environmental matrices were published. The suitability of optical sensing platforms—colorimetry, fluorescence, chemiluminescence, near-infrared spectroscopy, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, and surface plasma resonance—for pesticide analysis in food and water samples are presented in the first article [20]. Innovations in nanomaterials with improved functionality [21], as well as the integration of novel technologies in microfluidics [22] and data processing [23], will pave the way for commercialization. The emerging role of manganese-based nanoparticles in the detection of heavy metals in environmental matrices is reviewed in the second article [24]. Although detection limits in the sub-ppb range have been reached [25], future research directions should explore practical environmental applications, such as scalability, cost effectiveness, and integration in water treatment infrastructures. The third article [26] presents green strategies, based on the AGREEMIP tool [27], regarding molecular imprinted polymers (MIPs) for chemical sensors, with the aim of improving environmental sustainability, including lifecycle and fabrication routes. The fourth article presents microfluidic technologies that integrate miniaturization, rapid analysis, and reduced reagent consumption, and allow or the real-time monitoring of heavy metal ions in environmental matrices [28]. Bringing these technologies to the forefront of environmental monitoring remains challenging, with the stability and reproducibility of the sensors and integration of advanced data processing proving difficult [29].
Six review articles focus on biosensors. The first article demonstrates the potential of electrochemical miRNA biosensors in terms of high sensitivity, short protocol, and good specificity [30]. Challenges that should be addressed prior to their widespread clinical implementation are analyzed, such as robust multi-analyte detection [31,32], wearable instrumentation [33], and clinical validation. The fluorescent detection of pathogenic bacteria that threaten human health is reviewed in the second article [34]. Lower detection limits were obtained when combining specific recognition with nanomaterial-based probes [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]. Major challenges remain, including minimizing background interferences and improving the sensitivity of detection. The third article assesses the degree of glycosylation of biomolecules necessary for the diagnosis of some diseases, such as cancers [43]. Electrochemical biosensors are suitable candidates for this application, even in blood samples [44,45,46]. New detection probes and integration in microfluidic systems will pave the way for new applications. The fourth article shows that in the field of ISFET technology-based biosensors, sub-picomolar sensitivities can be achieved by combining nanoporous materials and miniaturized transistors [47]. Several configurations led to sub-Nernstian sensitivities [48,49,50], and transistors based on silicon nanowires had detection limits at the closest level to single-molecule detection [51,52,53]. The fifth article presents a combination of enzymatic catalysis and single solid-state nanochannel technology, which leads to a variation in ionic current in the presence of the enzymatic substrate in these nanofluidic devices [54]. The main drawback of the nanodevices is the lack of stability, and several methods of improvement have been proposed [55,56], such as pretreatments for limiting ionic interferences [57,58,59]. Progress in microfluidic paper-based glucose sensors in POCT applications is presented in the sixth article [60]. Colorimetric and electrochemical transducers associated with enzymatic- or non-enzymatic [61,62]-sensitive parts are described. An especially strong research interest has been shown in machine learning assistance [63,64] and AI [65,66].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Qiao, Y.; Yang, M.; Rao, S.; Ji, C.; Duan, X.; Yang, X.; Chen, S.; Zang, L. Advances and Prospects of Chemiresistive Breath Humidity Sensors. Chemosensors 2026, 14, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Huang, X.; Li, C.; Tan, K.; Wen, Y.; Guo, F.; Li, M.; Huang, Y.; Sun, C.; Gozin, M.; Zhang, L. Applying machine learning to balance performance and stability of high energy density materials. iScience 2021, 24, 102240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pelalak, R.; Thi, T.T.; Golestanifar, F.; Aallaei, M.; Heidari, Z. Molecular dynamics insights into the adsorption mechanism of acidic gases over iron based metal organic frameworks. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 21924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhang, Y.; Wu, C.; Fang, X.; Xu, L.; Shen, H.; Song, M.; Zhang, H.; Luan, G. Structural transitions and molecular interactions of zein induced by ethanol and extrusion. Food Chem. X 2025, 31, 103131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, X.; Allahyarov, E.; Li, Q.; Langhe, D.; Ponting, M.; Schuele, D.E.; Baer, E.; Zhu, L. Reducing dielectric loss by nanoconfined impurity ion transport in multilayer films under low electric fields. Compos. Part B Eng. 2020, 190, 107908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, J.; Qin, W.; Li, K.; Feng, L.; Chen, J.; Qiao, H.; Yang, M.; Tian, Z.; Li, X.; Gu, C.; et al. A high-sensitivity, fast-response and high-stability humidity sensor of curly flake Ti3C2Tx MXene prepared by electrolytic intercalation of NaOH solution. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 22278–22288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hu, X.; Cao, H.; Liu, H.; Lv, H.; Ge, Y.; Zhou, T. A flexible polyethyleneimine film sensor for high humidity monitoring. J. Mater. Chem. A 2025, 13, 26268–26278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Torkamani Cheriani, M.; Mirzaei, A.; Kim, J.H. Resistive-Based Nanostructured CeO2 Gas Sensors: A Review. Chemosensors 2025, 13, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shin, K.Y.; Kim, Y.; Mirzaei, A.; Kim, H.W.; Kim, S.S. Bimetal-Decorated Resistive Gas Sensors: A Review. J. Mater. Chem. C 2025, 13, 9930–9950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Park, H.; Kim, J.-H.; Vivod, D.; Kim, S.; Mirzaei, A.; Zahn, D.; Park, C.; Kim, S.S.; Halik, M. Chemical-Recognition-Driven Selectivity of SnO2-Nanowire-Based Gas Sensors. Nano Today 2021, 40, 101265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Niu, G.; Wang, F. A Review of MEMS-Based Metal Oxide Semiconductors Gas Sensor in Mainland China. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2022, 32, 054003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bhattacharyya, P. Technological Journey Towards Reliable Microheater Development for MEMS Gas Sensors: A Review. IEEE Trans. Device Mater. Reliab. 2014, 14, 589–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, Y.; Zhou, X.; Mao, S.; Chen, S.; Guo, Z. Challenges and Applications of Bio-Sniffers for Monitoring Volatile Organic Compounds in Medical Diagnostics. Chemosensors 2025, 13, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhong, X.; Li, D.; Du, W. Rapid recognition of volatile organic compounds with colorimetric sensor arrays for lung cancer screening. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2018, 410, 3671–3681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, L.; Fu, C.; Lou, Z. Flexible planar concentric circular micro-supercapacitor arrays for wearable gas sensing application. Nano Energy 2017, 41, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yammouri, G.; Ait Lahcen, A. AI-Reinforced Wearable Sensors and Intelligent Point-of-Care Tests. J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14, 1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cao, H.; Shi, H.; Tang, J. Ultrasensitive discrimination of volatile organic compounds using a microfluidic silicon SERS artificial intelligence chip. iScience 2023, 26, 107821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mansour, E.; Palzur, E.; Broza, Y.Y. Noninvasive Detection of Stress by Biochemical Profiles from the Skin. ACS Sens. 2023, 8, 1339–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Syed, I.B.; Sundaram, B.; Ayothiraman, S.; Yuvaraj, S. Planar Microwave Sensor suitable for Artificial-Intelligence (AI) based detection of Volatile Organic Compounds. AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2024, 185, 155444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pisoschi, A.M.; Stanca, L.; Iordache, F.; Ionasc, I.; Gajaila, I.; Ionut Geicu, O.; Bilteanu, L.; Serban, A.I. Nanostructure-Enhanced Optical Sensing Platforms for Pesticide Analysis in Food and Water Samples: A Review. Chemosensors 2026, 14, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, H.; Zhang, L.; Hu, Y.; Zhou, C.; Lan, W.; Fu, H.; She, Y. Nanomaterials as optical sensors for application in rapid detection of food contaminants, quality and authenticity. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 329, 129135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Reshma, P.A.; Kumar, P.S.; Calay, R.K.; Goel, S. Chemiluminescence coupled microfluidic point of source testing device for onsite detection of harmful pesticides in fruits. Microchem. J. 2025, 215, 114381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhu, C.; Jiang, C.; Lee, H.K.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, S. All Nanozyme-Based Cascade Reactions for Biomedical Applications: From Self-Cascading Nanozyme to Immobilized Cascade Nanozyme. Adv. Sci. 2025, 13, e19656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Keramari, V.; Girousi, S. Manganese Nanoparticles for Heavy Metal Detection vs. Noble and Base Metal Nanoparticles; Prospects, Limitations, and Applications in Electroanalysis. Chemosensors 2025, 13, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Antunović, V.; Ilić, M.; Baošić, R.; Jelić, D.; Lolić, A. Synthesis of MnCo2O4 nanoparticles as modifiers for simultaneous determination of Pb(II) and Cd(II). PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0210904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Costa, M.; Di Masi, S.; De Benedetto, G.E. Green Strategies and Decision Tools for Sustainability Assessment of Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Sensors: Review. Chemosensors 2026, 14, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Marć, M.; Wojnowski, W.; Pena-Pereira, F.; Tobiszewski, M.; Martín-Esteban, A. AGREEMIP: The Analytical greenness assessment tool for molecularly imprinted polymers synthesis. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 12516–12524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Furqan Rauf, M.; Lin, Z.; Kamran Rauf, M.; Lin, J.M. Innovative Microfluidic Technologies for Rapid Heavy Metal Ion Detection. Chemosensors 2025, 13, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tseng, H.Y.; Lizama, J.H.; Alvarado, N.A.S.; Hou, H.H. Lab-on-PCB: One step away from the accomplishment of muTAS? Biomicrofluidics 2022, 16, 031302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hunt, A.; Slaughter, G. Electrochemical Strategies for MicroRNA Quantification Leveraging Amplification and Nanomaterials: A Review. Chemosensors 2025, 13, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sen, D.; Lazenby, R.A. Electrochemical biosensor arrays for multiple analyte detection. Anal. Sens. 2024, 4, e202300047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jet, T.; Gines, G.; Rondelez, Y.; Taly, V. Advances in multiplexed techniques for the detection and quantification of microRNAs. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 4141–4161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Xing, E.; Chen, H.; Xin, X.; Cui, H.; Dou, Y.; Song, S. Recent Advances in Smart Phone-Based Biosensors for Various Applications. Chemosensors 2025, 13, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tang, X.; Qi, Q.; Li, B.; Zhu, Z.; Lu, J.; Liu, L. Recent Advances on Fluorescent Sensors for Detection of Pathogenic Bacteria. Chemosensors 2025, 13, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Han, W.S.; Lee, H.Y.; Jung, S.H.; Lee, S.J.; Jung, J.H. Silica-based chromogenic and fluorogenic hybrid chemosensor materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1904–1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. El-Safty, S.A.; Prabhakaran, D.; Ismail, A.A.; Matsunaga, H.; Mizukami, F. Nanosensor design packages: A smart and compact development for metal ions sensing responses. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2007, 17, 3731–3745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lee, S.J.; Lee, J.E.; Seo, J.; Jeong, I.Y.; Lee, S.S.; Jung, J.H. Optical sensor based on nanomaterial for the selective detection of toxic metal ions. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2007, 17, 3441–3446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, H.; He, Y. Recent advances in silicon nanomaterial-based fluorescent sensors. Sensors 2017, 17, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Singh, H.; Bamrah, A.; Bhardwaj, S.K.; Deep, A.; Khatri, M.; Kim, K.H.; Bhardwaj, N. Nanomaterial-based fluorescent sensors for the detection of lead ions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 407, 124379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, Y.; Xu, W.; Liu, H.; Jing, Y.; Zhou, D.; Ji, Y.; Widengren, J.; Bai, X.; Song, H. A multiband NIR upconversion core-shell design for enhanced light harvesting of silicon solar cells. Light Sci. Appl. 2024, 13, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, H.; Wang, J.; Chen, S. Face-to-face integrated tandem quantum-dot LEDs with high performance and multifunctionality. Light Sci. Appl. 2025, 14, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhao, J.; Liu, R.; Zou, G.; Ge, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Qiao, Y.; Ding, X.; Jiang, G.; Lou, Y.; Guo, Y.; et al. Deterministic resonance fluorescence improvement of single quantum dots by optimized surface passivation. Light Sci. Appl. 2025, 14, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Hormigos, R.M.; Monago-Maraña, O.; Crevillen, A.G. Electrochemical Strategies to Evaluate the Glycosylation Status of Biomolecules for Disease Diagnosis. Chemosensors 2026, 14, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chowdhury, A.D.; Ganganboina, A.B.; Park, E.Y.; Doong, R.A. Impedimetric biosensor for detection of cancer cells employing carbohydrate targeting ability of Concanavalin, A. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 122, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Shen, H.; Deng, W.; He, Y.; Li, X.; Song, J.; Liu, R.; Yang, G.; Li, L. Ultrasensitive aptasensor for isolation and detection of circulating tumor cells based on CeO2@Ir nanorods and DNA walker. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 168, 112516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, L.; Yu, C.; Gao, R.; Niu, Y.; Li, Y.; Chen, J.; He, J. An impedimetric biosensor for the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma based on the interaction between 3-aminophenyl boronic acid and sialic acid. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 92, 434–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ravariu, C.; Manea, E.; Pârvulescu, C.; Dima, G. Nanoporous Layer Integration for the Fabrication of ISFET and Related Transistor-Based Biosensors. Chemosensors 2025, 13, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wu, T.; Alharbi, A.; You, K.D.; Kisslinger, K.; Stach, E.A.; Shahrjerdi, D. Experimental Study of the Detection Limit in Dual Gate Biosensors Using Ultrathin Silicon Transistors. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 7142–7147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Srivastava, A.; Mahanty, B.; Mohapatra, P.K.; Sen, D.; Ghosh, S.K.; Sengupta, A.; Verboom, W. Development of a dual sensitive N,N,N’,N’,N”,N”-hexa-n-octylnitrilotriacetamide (HONTA) based potentiometric sensor for direct thorium(IV) estimation. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2024, 410, 135660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kim, Y.-U.; Cho, W.-J. Enhanced BSA Detection Precision: Leveraging High-Performance Dual-Gate Ion-Sensitive Field-Effect-Transistor Scheme and Surface-Treated Sensing Membranes. Biosensors 2024, 14, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Georgiev, Y.M.; Petkov, N.; Yu, R.; Nightingale, A.M.; Buitrago, E.; Lotty, O.; deMello, J.C.; Ionescu, A.M.; Holmes, J.D. Detection of ultra-low protein concentrations with the simplest possible field effect transistor. Nanotechnology 2019, 30, 324001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Mattioli, I.A.; Hassan, A.; Sanches, N.M.; Vieira, N.C.S.; Crespilho, F.N. Highly sensitive interfaces of graphene electrical-electrochemical vertical devices for on drop atto-molar DNA detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 175, 112851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Alabdullah, M.G.K.; Elmessary, M.A.; Nagy, D.; Seoane, N.; García-Loureiro, A.-J.; Kalna, K. Scaling Challenges of Nanosheet Field-Effect Transistors into Sub-2 nm Nodes. IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. 2024, 12, 479–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hernández Parra, L.M.; Azzaroni, O.; Marmisollé, W.A. Enzyme-Based Single Solid-State Nanochannel Biosensors. Chemosensors 2025, 13, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Parra, L.M.H.; Laucirica, G.; Toimil-Molares, M.E.; Marmisollé, W.; Azzaroni, O. Sensing Creatinine in Urine via the Iontronic Response of Enzymatic Single Solid-State Nanochannels. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2025, 268, 116893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Miguel Hernandez Parra, L.; Gramajo, M.E.; Maffoni, L.O.; Gregorio, L.; Peinetti, A.S.; Cortez, M.L.; Toimil-Molares, M.E.; Waldemar, A.M.; Azzaroni, O. Single Nanochannel-Based Iontronic Detection of Adenosine at Nanomolar Concentrations. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2026, 452, 139453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Montero-Jimenez, M.; Lugli-Arroyo, J.; Fenoy, G.E.; Piccinini, E.; Knoll, W.; Marmisollé, W.A.; Azzaroni, O. Transduction of Amine–Phosphate Supramolecular Interactions and Biosensing of Acetylcholine through PEDOT-Polyamine Organic Electrochemical Transistors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 61419–61427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Laucirica, G.; Marmisollé, W.A.; Azzaroni, O. Dangerous Liaisons: Anion-Induced Protonation in Phosphate–Polyamine Interactions and Their Implications for the Charge States of Biologically Relevant Surfaces. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 8612–8620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Laucirica, G.; Pérez-Mitta, G.; Toimil-Molares, M.E.; Trautmann, C.; Marmisollé, W.A.; Azzaroni, O. Amine-Phosphate Specific Interactions within Nanochannels: Binding Behavior and Nanoconfinement Effects. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 28997–29007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gia Le, P.; Cho, S. Microfluidic Paper-Based Sensors and Their Applications for Glucose Sensing. Chemosensors 2025, 13, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mei, X.; Chen, Z.; Wen, A.; Zhang, J.; Wei, X.; Wang, F.; Zhou, L.; Wang, B.; Wu, Y. Wearable Three-dimensional Paper-based Microfluidic Electrochemical Sensors for Real-time Sweat Monitoring. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 515, 163786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Li, N.; Zhou, Y.; Sun, H.; Wang, N.; Yang, N.; Ren, P.; Fu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, W.; Li, Y.; et al. Rapid Analysis of Salivary Glucose Content using MOF/MIPs Biomimetic Microfluidic Paper Chips. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 504, 159023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lian, M.; Shi, F.; Cao, Q.; Wang, C.; Li, N.; Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Chen, D. Paper-based Colorimetric Sensor using Bimetallic Nickel-Cobalt Selenides Nanozyme with Artificial Neural Network-assisted for Detection of H2O2 on Smartphone. Spectrophim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2024, 311, 124038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Yan, L.; Zhang, B.; Zhou, W.; Hao, J.; Shi, H.; Wang, S.; Shuang, S.; Shi, L. An Artificial Intelligence Handheld Sensor for Direct Reading of Nickel Ion and Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid in Food Samples using Ratiometric Fluorescence Cellulose Paper Microfluidic Chip. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 279, 135083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Shalini, J.; Ashok Kumar, L. An Explainable Artificial Intelligence Driven Fall System for Sensor Data Analysis Enhanced by Butterworth Filtering. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2025, 158, 111364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Medanki, S.; Dommati, N.; Bodapati, H.H.; Katru, V.; Moses, G.; Komaraju, A.; Donepudi, N.S.; Yalamanchili, D.; Sateesh, J.; Turimerla, P. Artificial Intelligence Powered Glucose Monitoring and Controlling System: Pumping Module. World J. Exp. Med. 2024, 14, 87916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jaffrezic-Renault, N.; Lin, J.-M. Feature Review Papers in Chemical/Bio-Sensors and Analytical Chemistry in 2025. Chemosensors 2026, 14, 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors14040083

AMA Style

Jaffrezic-Renault N, Lin J-M. Feature Review Papers in Chemical/Bio-Sensors and Analytical Chemistry in 2025. Chemosensors. 2026; 14(4):83. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors14040083

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jaffrezic-Renault, Nicole, and Jin-Ming Lin. 2026. "Feature Review Papers in Chemical/Bio-Sensors and Analytical Chemistry in 2025" Chemosensors 14, no. 4: 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors14040083

APA Style

Jaffrezic-Renault, N., & Lin, J.-M. (2026). Feature Review Papers in Chemical/Bio-Sensors and Analytical Chemistry in 2025. Chemosensors, 14(4), 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors14040083

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop