Rusu, G.; Achimaș-Cadariu, P.; Piciu, A.; Căinap, S.S.; Căinap, C.; Piciu, D.
A Comparative Study between 18F-FDG PET/CT and Conventional Imaging in the Evaluation of Progressive Disease and Recurrence in Ovarian Carcinoma. Healthcare 2021, 9, 666.
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9060666
AMA Style
Rusu G, Achimaș-Cadariu P, Piciu A, Căinap SS, Căinap C, Piciu D.
A Comparative Study between 18F-FDG PET/CT and Conventional Imaging in the Evaluation of Progressive Disease and Recurrence in Ovarian Carcinoma. Healthcare. 2021; 9(6):666.
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9060666
Chicago/Turabian Style
Rusu, George, Patriciu Achimaș-Cadariu, Andra Piciu, Simona Sorana Căinap, Călin Căinap, and Doina Piciu.
2021. "A Comparative Study between 18F-FDG PET/CT and Conventional Imaging in the Evaluation of Progressive Disease and Recurrence in Ovarian Carcinoma" Healthcare 9, no. 6: 666.
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9060666
APA Style
Rusu, G., Achimaș-Cadariu, P., Piciu, A., Căinap, S. S., Căinap, C., & Piciu, D.
(2021). A Comparative Study between 18F-FDG PET/CT and Conventional Imaging in the Evaluation of Progressive Disease and Recurrence in Ovarian Carcinoma. Healthcare, 9(6), 666.
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9060666