Next Article in Journal
The Most Widely Disseminated COVID-19-Related Scientific Publications in Online Media: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Articles with the Highest Altmetric Attention Scores
Previous Article in Journal
Age Estimation Using the Cameriere Methods of Open Apices: A Meta-Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Healthcare
Volume 9
Issue 2
10.3390/healthcare9020238
Review Report
healthcare-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Study Protocol
Peer-Review Record

Development of a Logic Model for a Programme to Reduce the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Rate for Non-Specific Lower Back Pain in a Tertiary Care Centre

Healthcare 2021, 9(2), 238; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9020238
by Ahmed Alhowimel 1,*, Faris Alodaibi 2, Mazyad Alotaibi 1, Dalyah Alamam 2, Hana Alsobayel 2 and Julie Fritz 3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Jonas Vinstrup
Healthcare 2021, 9(2), 238; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9020238
Submission received: 29 January 2021 / Revised: 16 February 2021 / Accepted: 19 February 2021 / Published: 23 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Health Policy)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is protocol of important topic.

I suggest the investigators to provide the decision tree algorithms as figure to demonstrate better.

Please provide the information whether neurologist, neurosurgeon, and spine Orthopaedic will be involved in these processes? and in which stages?

Author Response

Thank you for allowing us to submit a revised draft of our manuscript titled " “Development of a logic model for a programme to reduce the magnetic resonance imaging rate for non-specific low back pain in a tertiary care centre”. We appreciate the time and effort that you have dedicated to providing your valuable feedback on our manuscript. We are grateful for your insightful comments on our paper. We have been able to incorporate changes to reflect most of the suggestions. We have highlighted the changes within the manuscript.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Thank you for an interesting read.

In addition to Hartvigsen 2018, consider adding 1 (Nadine 2018) or both of the remaining articles from the Lancet LBP series. Also, elaborating (further) on the psychosocial consequences of current imaging practices (e.g. catastrophizing, dependency etc.) might improve the manuscript.

https://www.thelancet.com/series/low-back-pain

Aside from a few typos and the need for improving the visual layout of both tables, I have no further comments on the manuscript.

I look forward seeing the program put into action.

Author Response

Thank you for allowing us to submit a revised draft of our manuscript titled " “Development of a logic model for a programme to reduce the magnetic resonance imaging rate for non-specific low back pain in a tertiary care centre”. We appreciate the time and effort that you have dedicated to providing your valuable feedback on our manuscript. We are grateful for your insightful comments on our paper. We have been able to incorporate changes to reflect most of the suggestions. We have highlighted the changes within the manuscript.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

all of my comments have been addressed

Back to TopTop