Next Article in Journal
Cross Diffusion Induced Turing Patterns in a Tritrophic Food Chain Model with Crowley-Martin Functional Response
Next Article in Special Issue
Methods for Assessing Human–Machine Performance under Fuzzy Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
The Prouhet Tarry Escott Problem: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Partial-Consensus Posterior-Aggregation FAHP Method—Supplier Selection Problem as an Example
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

p-Topologicalness—A Relative Topologicalness in ⊤-Convergence Spaces

Mathematics 2019, 7(3), 228; https://doi.org/10.3390/math7030228
by Lingqiang Li
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Mathematics 2019, 7(3), 228; https://doi.org/10.3390/math7030228
Submission received: 24 January 2019 / Revised: 16 February 2019 / Accepted: 25 February 2019 / Published: 1 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fuzzy Sets, Fuzzy Logic and Their Applications)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

- The connection of the manuscript with Fuzzy Sets theory should be underlined in the Introduction (one paragraph before the end of it and after the sentence "This paper...")

- The word "References" should be added at the top of the list of References

- Is the footnote "Preprint submitted to Elsevier" at the bottom of Page 1 necessary?

Author Response

Response to Reviewer 1 Comments

 

Dear Prof

 

Thank you very much for your useful comments and valuable suggestions. We have revised the paper according to your report. We hope that meet the requirement!

 

For the convenience of reviewers, we use bold characters to write the revised parts.

 

Point 1: The connection of the manuscript with Fuzzy Sets theory should be underlined in the Introduction (one paragraph before the end of it and after the sentence "This paper...") 

 

Response 1: We have pointed out that connection in the Introduction section, see page 1, line 21-23.

 

Point 2: The word "References" should be added at the top of the list of References.

 

Response 2: We have added it.

 

Point 3: Is the footnote "Preprint submitted to Elsevier" at the bottom of Page 1 necessary?

 

Response 3: We have deleted them.

 

Thanks a lot for your helpful suggestions again.

 

Best wishes!

 

Lingqiang Li

 


Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The article is written in a good and clear form. Outputs are adequately presented.


Minor comments

- Numbered lists - Use each number on a new line (lines 45-47 and others)

- Please thoroughly check the formulas

- Modify some formulas to not overflow to the next line (line 103 and others)


Author Response

Response to Reviewer 2 Comments

 

Dear Prof

 

Thank you very much for your useful comments and valuable suggestions. We have revised the paper according to your report. We hope that meet the requirement!

 

For the convenience of reviewers, we use blue characters to write the revised parts.

 

Point 1: Numbered lists - Use each number on a new line (lines 45-47 and others).

 

Response 1: We have revised them. Please see

 

lines 44-49;

 

line 165-167;

 

line 280-281.

 

Point 2: Please thoroughly check the formulas.

 

Response 2: We have checked all formulas and revised one formula in Theorem 4.12. Please see, line 374.

Point 3: Modify some formulas to not overflow to the next line (line 103 and others).

 

Response 3: We have revised them. Please see

 

line 107;

 

line 175;

 

line 306;

 

line 235.

 

 

Thanks a lot for your helpful suggestions again.

 

Best wishes!

 

Lingqiang Li


Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop