Next Article in Journal
Enhanced Transmission Loss and Modal Coupling in Dual-Membrane Flexible-Shell Cylindrical Waveguides: A Rigorous Mode-Matching–Galerkin Framework
Previous Article in Journal
Geometric Structure of Genomes Across the Tree of Life: Toward a Geometric Theory of Sequence Structure
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Fuzzy Iterative Learning Contouring Control

1
Advanced Institute of Manufacturing with High-Tech Innovations, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi 621, Taiwan
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi 621, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2026, 14(10), 1759; https://doi.org/10.3390/math14101759
Submission received: 14 March 2026 / Revised: 30 April 2026 / Accepted: 15 May 2026 / Published: 20 May 2026

Abstract

Iterative learning contouring control (ILCC) improves contouring accuracy in multi-axis motion systems via the equivalent contour error formulation. However, its convergence strongly depends on the learning gain. Large gains may induce overly aggressive updates and local divergence, degrading performance, whereas small gains lead to slow convergence. Moreover, contour error convergence is typically non-uniform along the trajectory, and local divergence may still occur despite global convergence, particularly near error saturation regions. To address these issues, a fuzzy inference mechanism is integrated into the online ILCC framework, yielding an online ILCC with fuzzy-regulated convergence parameters (online ILCCf), enabling adaptive regulation of the learning gain. Two regulation strategies are developed: (i) online ILCCfi, an independent multi-parameter regulation scheme; and (ii) online ILCCfu, a unified single-parameter regulation scheme. The fuzzy mechanism adaptively adjusts the convergence parameters online according to the instantaneous magnitude of the equivalent contour error. Experimental results on a six-axis industrial robot demonstrate fast convergence while maintaining satisfactory contouring performance. Among all comparison cases , online ILCCfi achieves the best performance, reducing the RMS position error from 7.26×101 mm to 5.93×102 mm and the RMS orientation error from 6.95×104 rad to 5.64×105 rad, without oscillation or local divergence. Further simulations confirm robustness under model uncertainty and measurement noise.
Keywords: motion control; contouring control; iterative learning contouring control; ILC; ILCC; fuzzy motion control; contouring control; iterative learning contouring control; ILC; ILCC; fuzzy

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ta, T.-Q.; Chen, S.-L. Fuzzy Iterative Learning Contouring Control. Mathematics 2026, 14, 1759. https://doi.org/10.3390/math14101759

AMA Style

Ta T-Q, Chen S-L. Fuzzy Iterative Learning Contouring Control. Mathematics. 2026; 14(10):1759. https://doi.org/10.3390/math14101759

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ta, Thanh-Quan, and Shyh-Leh Chen. 2026. "Fuzzy Iterative Learning Contouring Control" Mathematics 14, no. 10: 1759. https://doi.org/10.3390/math14101759

APA Style

Ta, T.-Q., & Chen, S.-L. (2026). Fuzzy Iterative Learning Contouring Control. Mathematics, 14(10), 1759. https://doi.org/10.3390/math14101759

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop