You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
by
  • Junping Li1,2

Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Anonymous

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

See attachement

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

1. The article is interesting - I do think the authors could improve the language.

2. The content is interesting but I do believe the authors could try to provide more context in the introduction.

3. The mathematics could be overwhelming at a first read, I do suggest the authors try to add some description of the methodology.

4. This is an interesting and applicable topic, I would suggest the authors try to add some comments to provide justification and applications - this would "spice" things up a bit.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

PErfrom language editing.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The revised paper reflect some changes which provide the reader with some added insight.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

N/A