Next Article in Journal
Improved Beluga Whale Optimization for Solving the Simulation Optimization Problems with Stochastic Constraints
Previous Article in Journal
On the Extended Version of Krasnoselśkiĭ’s Theorem for Kannan-Type Equicontractive Mappings
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

State-Based Differential Privacy Verification and Enforcement for Probabilistic Automata

Institute of Systems Engineering, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, Macau SAR, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2023, 11(8), 1853; https://doi.org/10.3390/math11081853
Submission received: 10 March 2023 / Revised: 11 April 2023 / Accepted: 11 April 2023 / Published: 13 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Section E2: Control Theory and Mechanics)

Abstract

Roughly speaking, differential privacy is a privacy-preserving strategy that guarantees attackers to be unlikely to infer, from the previous system output, the dataset from which an output is derived. This work introduces differential privacy to discrete event systems modeled by probabilistic automata to protect the state information pertaining to system resource configurations. State differential privacy is defined to protect the initial state of a discrete event system, which represents its initial resource configuration. Step-based state differential privacy verification is proposed in the framework of probabilistic automata, such that an attacker is unlikely to determine the initial state from which a system evolves, within a finite step of observations, if two systems with two different initial states satisfy state differential privacy. Specifically, the probability distributions of generating observations within a finite step from the two different initial states are approximate. If the two systems do not satisfy state differential privacy, a control specification is proposed, such that state differential privacy is enforced via supervisory control that is maximally permissive. Experimental studies are given to illustrate that the proposed method can effectively verify state differential privacy and enforce privacy protection in the probabilistic automata framework.
Keywords: differential privacy; discrete event system; probabilistic automaton; supervisory control; privacy protection differential privacy; discrete event system; probabilistic automaton; supervisory control; privacy protection

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Teng, Y.; Li, Z.; Yin, L.; Wu, N. State-Based Differential Privacy Verification and Enforcement for Probabilistic Automata. Mathematics 2023, 11, 1853. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11081853

AMA Style

Teng Y, Li Z, Yin L, Wu N. State-Based Differential Privacy Verification and Enforcement for Probabilistic Automata. Mathematics. 2023; 11(8):1853. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11081853

Chicago/Turabian Style

Teng, Yuanxiu, Zhiwu Li, Li Yin, and Naiqi Wu. 2023. "State-Based Differential Privacy Verification and Enforcement for Probabilistic Automata" Mathematics 11, no. 8: 1853. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11081853

APA Style

Teng, Y., Li, Z., Yin, L., & Wu, N. (2023). State-Based Differential Privacy Verification and Enforcement for Probabilistic Automata. Mathematics, 11(8), 1853. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11081853

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop