Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
What is Normalization? The Strategies Employed in Top-Down and Bottom-Up Proteome Analysis Workflows
Previous Article in Journal
Proteomic Analysis of Plasma-Derived Exosomes in Defining Their Role as Biomarkers of Disease Progression, Response to Therapy and Outcome
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Proteomic View of Cellular Responses to Anticancer Quinoline-Copper Complexes
Open AccessErratum

Dowling, P.; et al. Characterization of Contractile Proteins from Skeletal Muscle Using Gel-Based Top-Down Proteomics. Proteomes 2019, 7, 25

1
Department of Biology, Maynooth University, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, W23F2H6 Co. Kildare, Ireland
2
MU Human Health Research Institute, Maynooth University, Maynooth, W23F2H6 Co. Kildare, Ireland
3
Institute of Physiology II, University of Bonn, D-53115 Bonn, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Proteomes 2019, 7(3), 28; https://doi.org/10.3390/proteomes7030028
Received: 11 July 2019 / Accepted: 12 July 2019 / Published: 15 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Top-down Proteomics: In Memory of Dr. Alfred Yergey)
The authors wish to make the following correction to their paper [1]:
The Figure 2 and Figure 5 have some irregular typesetting. The corrected Figure 2 and Figure 5 should be:

Reference

  1. Dowling, P.; Zweyer, M.; Swandulla, D.; Ohlendieck, K. Characterization of Contractile Proteins from Skeletal Muscle Using Gel-Based Top-Down Proteomics. Proteomes 2019, 7, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 2. Overview of the bioanalytical advantages versus potential technical limitations of gel-based top-down proteomics, especially in relation to two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DGE) approaches.
Figure 2. Overview of the bioanalytical advantages versus potential technical limitations of gel-based top-down proteomics, especially in relation to two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DGE) approaches.
Proteomes 07 00028 g002
Figure 5. Overview of fluorescence two-dimensional difference in-gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) techniques for the comparative analysis of proteoforms. The upper panel shows the two main DIGE approaches for the systematic pre-electrophoretic labelling of protein fractions using fluorescent CyDyes. These methods utilise minimal sub-stochiometric labelling of assessable lysines in proteins or saturation labelling of assessable cysteines in proteins. The lower panel outlines three-dye (Cy2, Cy3, Cy5) versus two-dye (Cy3, Cy5) DIGE labelling methodology.
Figure 5. Overview of fluorescence two-dimensional difference in-gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) techniques for the comparative analysis of proteoforms. The upper panel shows the two main DIGE approaches for the systematic pre-electrophoretic labelling of protein fractions using fluorescent CyDyes. These methods utilise minimal sub-stochiometric labelling of assessable lysines in proteins or saturation labelling of assessable cysteines in proteins. The lower panel outlines three-dye (Cy2, Cy3, Cy5) versus two-dye (Cy3, Cy5) DIGE labelling methodology.
Proteomes 07 00028 g005
Back to TopTop