Next Article in Journal
Enhancing Mental Calculation Through Game-Based Learning: Evidence from a Study on Divisibility in Primary Education
Next Article in Special Issue
Intergenerational Differences in Generative AI Adoption: A Model Explaining the Roles of AI Competency, Responsible AI Adoption, and Ethical Awareness in Higher Education
Previous Article in Journal
The Influence of Aesthetic Education on Graduates’ Research Innovation Ability Based on the Multiple Intermediary Model of Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Transformational Leadership in Higher Education: A Motivation–Ability–Opportunity Perspective

School of Management, Adelaide University, Adelaide 5000, Australia
Educ. Sci. 2026, 16(6), 903; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16060903
Submission received: 7 April 2026 / Revised: 12 May 2026 / Accepted: 3 June 2026 / Published: 5 June 2026

Abstract

Transformational leadership (TL) remains a dominant framework in educational leadership, yet its effectiveness appears inconsistent across institutional contexts, including higher education (HE). This study develops a contingent explanation of TL using the Motivation–Ability–Opportunity (MAO) lens. Drawing on an integrative review of 19 empirical studies, the analysis examines how TL practices interact with organisational conditions to produce transformational or symbolic outcomes. The findings indicate that TL operates through three interdependent mechanisms: motivational alignment, capability development, and structural empowerment. However, these mechanisms are fragile and contingent upon contextual factors including governance autonomy, resource infrastructure, organisational culture, leadership-system maturity, and strategic orientation. When these conditions are aligned, TL fosters sustained engagement, innovation, and institutional learning. When they are misaligned, TL can devolve into rhetorical or symbolic practice, generating cynicism and inertia. The study contributes to the theory and practice of leadership in HE by reconceptualising TL as a conditional system rather than a universally effective leadership style, highlighting the importance of organisational context in enabling or constraining leadership impact.
Keywords: transformational leadership; higher education; motivation–ability–opportunity; leadership effectiveness; educational leadership transformational leadership; higher education; motivation–ability–opportunity; leadership effectiveness; educational leadership

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fayezi, S. Transformational Leadership in Higher Education: A Motivation–Ability–Opportunity Perspective. Educ. Sci. 2026, 16, 903. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16060903

AMA Style

Fayezi S. Transformational Leadership in Higher Education: A Motivation–Ability–Opportunity Perspective. Education Sciences. 2026; 16(6):903. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16060903

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fayezi, Sajad. 2026. "Transformational Leadership in Higher Education: A Motivation–Ability–Opportunity Perspective" Education Sciences 16, no. 6: 903. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16060903

APA Style

Fayezi, S. (2026). Transformational Leadership in Higher Education: A Motivation–Ability–Opportunity Perspective. Education Sciences, 16(6), 903. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16060903

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop