Next Article in Journal
Student Professional Collaboration as a Contemporary Format for Knowledge Sharing and Conducting Research in the University Environment
Previous Article in Journal
An Exploratory Cross-National Study of K–12 Teachers’ Generative AI Literacy and Classroom Enactment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

A Lecture-Specific AI-Based Tutor for Higher Education: Pedagogical Design and Empirical Evaluation

Center for Active Learning, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Educ. Sci. 2026, 16(5), 812; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16050812 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 1 April 2026 / Revised: 13 May 2026 / Accepted: 18 May 2026 / Published: 21 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Technology Enhanced Education)

Abstract

Generative AI tools are increasingly used in higher education, yet most available systems lack pedagogical grounding, course alignment, and insight into student learning. This paper presents the development, implementation, and evaluation of the bioTutor, an open-source, course-specific AI chatbot designed to support constructivist learning in large university classrooms. The system integrates a curated knowledge base, a didactically structured interaction design, and a learning analytics dashboard for instructors that summarizes anonymized student-chatbot conversations. To assess students’ perceptions of usefulness, ease of use, learning relevance, output quality, and result demonstrability, we developed an education-adapted extension of the Technology Acceptance Model (edTAM) and applied it in an introductory biology course with 407 enrolled students. During a 23-week deployment, students generated more than 10,000 interactions across over 1000 conversations. Questionnaire data indicate high usability, strong perceived usefulness, and broad interest in adopting similar tools. Usage patterns show that the bioTutor was employed both for learning and exam preparation. These findings suggest that students perceived pedagogically structured, course-grounded AI chatbots as useful for learning and exam preparation, while the lecturer dashboard provided aggregated insights into students’ questions and recurring difficulties. The open-source framework enables adaptation to other disciplines and provides a scalable foundation for further research on didactically informed AI systems in higher education.
Keywords: generative AI; chatbot; higher education; intelligent tutoring system; learning analytics; constructivist pedagogy; educational technology generative AI; chatbot; higher education; intelligent tutoring system; learning analytics; constructivist pedagogy; educational technology

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tobler, S.; Köhler, K. A Lecture-Specific AI-Based Tutor for Higher Education: Pedagogical Design and Empirical Evaluation. Educ. Sci. 2026, 16, 812. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16050812

AMA Style

Tobler S, Köhler K. A Lecture-Specific AI-Based Tutor for Higher Education: Pedagogical Design and Empirical Evaluation. Education Sciences. 2026; 16(5):812. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16050812

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tobler, Samuel, and Katja Köhler. 2026. "A Lecture-Specific AI-Based Tutor for Higher Education: Pedagogical Design and Empirical Evaluation" Education Sciences 16, no. 5: 812. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16050812

APA Style

Tobler, S., & Köhler, K. (2026). A Lecture-Specific AI-Based Tutor for Higher Education: Pedagogical Design and Empirical Evaluation. Education Sciences, 16(5), 812. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16050812

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop