This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Assessing Differentiation in All Phases of Teaching (ADAPT): Properties and Quality of the ADAPT Instrument
by
Marieke van Geel
Marieke van Geel 1,*
,
Trynke Keuning
Trynke Keuning 2
,
Marjoleine Dobbelaer
Marjoleine Dobbelaer 3 and
Cees Glas
Cees Glas 4
1
Section of Teacher Professional Development, University of Twente, Postbus 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
2
Knowledge and Innovation Centre, Hogeschool KPZ, Ten Oeverstraat 68, 8012 EW Zwolle, The Netherlands
3
Team Kwaliteit van Leraren, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Postbus 5375, 6802 EJ Arnhem, The Netherlands
4
Section on Cognition, Data and Education, University of Twente, Postbus 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Educ. Sci. 2025, 15(11), 1530; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15111530 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 22 May 2025
/
Revised: 23 October 2025
/
Accepted: 7 November 2025
/
Published: 13 November 2025
Abstract
Existing observation instruments to measure differentiated instruction often lack insight into the degree to which teachers’ decisions match the actual needs of their students, and neglect the importance of preparation and evaluation. This article describes the psychometric evaluation of a comprehensive instrument (Assessing Differentiation in All Phases of Teaching; ADAPT) that does not suffer from these shortcomings. To assess its quality, 41 raters used it to score videos of lessons and interviews of 86 primary school teachers. A 5-dimensional item-response model showed good fit and high internal consistency, and a decision study was conducted to determine the reliability and agreement coefficients for different numbers of raters. For the intended low-stakes use, a single rater would be enough to provide a reliable estimate of a teacher’s overall score. Finally, rater experiences showed that ADAPT has high practical value due to the comprehensive manual and detailed score descriptions and examples. The instrument can therefore not only be used for research purposes, but can also serve as a valuable resource for teachers and teacher educators in practice.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
van Geel, M.; Keuning, T.; Dobbelaer, M.; Glas, C.
Assessing Differentiation in All Phases of Teaching (ADAPT): Properties and Quality of the ADAPT Instrument. Educ. Sci. 2025, 15, 1530.
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15111530
AMA Style
van Geel M, Keuning T, Dobbelaer M, Glas C.
Assessing Differentiation in All Phases of Teaching (ADAPT): Properties and Quality of the ADAPT Instrument. Education Sciences. 2025; 15(11):1530.
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15111530
Chicago/Turabian Style
van Geel, Marieke, Trynke Keuning, Marjoleine Dobbelaer, and Cees Glas.
2025. "Assessing Differentiation in All Phases of Teaching (ADAPT): Properties and Quality of the ADAPT Instrument" Education Sciences 15, no. 11: 1530.
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15111530
APA Style
van Geel, M., Keuning, T., Dobbelaer, M., & Glas, C.
(2025). Assessing Differentiation in All Phases of Teaching (ADAPT): Properties and Quality of the ADAPT Instrument. Education Sciences, 15(11), 1530.
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15111530
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.