Next Article in Journal
Team-Assisted Individualization Type of the Cooperative Learning Model for Improving Mathematical Problem Solving, Communication, and Self-Proficiency: Evidence from Operations Research Teaching
Previous Article in Journal
Development of New Distance Learning Platform to Create and Deliver Learning Content for Deaf Students
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reality vs. Expectations of Assessment in STEM Education: An Exploratory Case Study of STEM Schools in Egypt
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

STEM 1, 2, 3: Levelling Up in Primary Schools

Sydney School of Education & Social Work, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Educ. Sci. 2022, 12(11), 827; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110827
Submission received: 18 October 2022 / Revised: 11 November 2022 / Accepted: 16 November 2022 / Published: 17 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interdisciplinary STEM Teaching and Learning in Schools)

Abstract

Recent research advocating the educational value of engaging primary students in authentic integrated STEM inquiry projects also identifies challenges for teachers aspiring to high-quality student-learning experiences. Teachers require support to integrate disciplines, prioritise processes and reasoning over curriculum content, and increase student autonomy in purposeful STEM projects. Within the context of a year-long professional learning program in Australia, an innovative tri-level approach to skill-building for teachers and their students has been developed. The three levels of ‘STEM Skills’, ‘Design Process’ and ‘Integrated STEM Projects’ are intended to successively escalate demands on time, resources and pedagogical change while promoting the development of the dispositions and skills needed to engage in sustained inquiry projects. The teacher participants (n = 11) came from five schools who had just concluded the STEM Academy professional learning program. Semi-structured interviews guided teacher reflection. Data analysis combined inductive and deductive processes to thematize meaning and revealed ways in which the tri-level approach to STEM education supported the development of STEM integration practices. The findings suggest the efficacy of the tri-level approach and its potential value beyond the context in which it was developed.
Keywords: STEM education; professional development; teacher perceptions; interview STEM education; professional development; teacher perceptions; interview

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Way, J.; Preston, C.; Cartwright, K. STEM 1, 2, 3: Levelling Up in Primary Schools. Educ. Sci. 2022, 12, 827. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110827

AMA Style

Way J, Preston C, Cartwright K. STEM 1, 2, 3: Levelling Up in Primary Schools. Education Sciences. 2022; 12(11):827. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110827

Chicago/Turabian Style

Way, Jennifer, Christine Preston, and Katherin Cartwright. 2022. "STEM 1, 2, 3: Levelling Up in Primary Schools" Education Sciences 12, no. 11: 827. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110827

APA Style

Way, J., Preston, C., & Cartwright, K. (2022). STEM 1, 2, 3: Levelling Up in Primary Schools. Education Sciences, 12(11), 827. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110827

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop