Next Article in Journal
Mathematics Applied to the Economy and Sustainable Development Goals: A Necessary Relationship of Dependence
Previous Article in Journal
The Structure of Entrepreneurial Team Members’ Competencies: Between Effectuation and Causation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Active Learning: Subtypes, Intra-Exam Comparison, and Student Survey in an Undergraduate Biology Course
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Impact of Undergraduate Research Journals on the Scholarly World: Present but Small

1
Faculty of Law, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
2
School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
3
School of Learning, Development and Professional Practice, Faculty of Education & Social Work, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
4
Surgical and Translational Research Centre, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Educ. Sci. 2020, 10(11), 338; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110338
Submission received: 29 August 2020 / Revised: 13 November 2020 / Accepted: 17 November 2020 / Published: 18 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Undergraduate Research as a High Impact Practice in Higher Education)

Abstract

:
Background: Undergraduate research journals are a popular mechanism for inducting students into research, communication, and publication facets of academia. A thematic review of 17 review papers found little evidence for journal impact. Methods: A scoping review identified 91 journals. A systematic search identified the journal website, its International Standard Serial Number (if any), its citation rate on Google Scholar, its start year and end year (if applicable). Results: Seventy-five journals had both a Google Scholar h-index and a discoverable start year. Sixty-eight had been cited one or more times. The median h-index was 2, mode was h = 1, and the average h-index = 4.38. Correlation with start year was not statistically significant, neither was content field of journals. Conclusions: Surprisingly, almost all currently published journals have been cited at least once, showing that undergraduate research journals have some impact on the scholarly world. Further analyses are suggested to examine career impact of publication on students and faculty.

1. Introduction

Undergraduate research journals (URJs) are formal publications of material generated by undergraduate students. Worldwide, the volume and popularity of URJs appears to be growing at an impressive rate. As evidence for this, the Council on Undergraduate Research (CUR: https://www.cur.org/resources/students/journals/) and the British Conference of Undergraduate Research (BCUR) both have large databases of undergraduate journals in the United States of America and Britain, respectively. In 2008, the CUR website listed approximately 40 undergraduate journals in the United States [1], which increased to 70 journals by 2011 [2] and reached 115 in 2013 [3]. This number has increased substantially since then. This demonstrates the reported “explosion” of interest in USA based URJs in recent years [4]. A similar trend can be seen in the United Kingdom; in 2008, the BCUR listed 10 journals [5] and by 2017, 27 were listed. Undergraduate journals are not limited to the UK or the USA with Macquarie University (https://www.mq.edu.au/lih/altc/ug_research/websites.php#Undergraduatejournals/) (Australia) currently listing five URJs. Obviously, URJs can be published in any language, but the analyses conducted in this paper were restricted to English-language reviews, which led to identification of only two journals from outside the anglophone sphere.
Despite this evident growth in popularity, the academic nature, publication process, and organisational infrastructure of URJs varies has only been intermittently and selectively reviewed. It is surprising that, to our knowledge, the objective academic impact of URJs has not been formally assessed. A review of this publishing sector in this regard is now long overdue and has now been suggested on several occasions [6,7]. In particular, Stone [5] explicitly stated the need for further research on the academic impact of the articles being published (i.e., citations).
Academic impact is multifactorial. This paper addresses impact by undertaking a conventional raw frequency citation analysis (i.e., not adjusted by number of papers published within a fixed time period) for each identified journal. This approach allows us to determine the scholarly impact of a research journal; if authors cite papers from a journal, then it can be presumed that the journal is having some impact on the scholarly world. This is key to understanding the contribution URJs make and helps to distinguish them from vanity projects and/or simple coursework. Thus, the aim of this paper was to provide a summary of the scope, features, and characteristics of URJs and evaluate their citation rates. To do this, a scoping review and thematic analysis of the previous literature reviews of undergraduate journals was undertaken. While the previous review we use to describe URJs is somewhat dated, its advantage is that the scoping review identified URJs that were sufficiently important to be listed and are sufficiently established so as to have both reputation and potential for citation. This means that a more realistic citation impact is likely compared to evaluating recent journals that may not yet be well-read. This strategy allows for more thorough evaluation of journal impact and longevity.
In Section 2, we describe our scoping review process and present a thematic synthesis of URJs. In Section 3, we report a formal quantified evaluation of the citation rates of the URJs identified in the scoping review. This is where our paper uniquely distinguishes itself from previous articles in this area, as it is the first detailed analysis of citation impact rates for URJs.

2. Scoping Review

A search for published reviews or commentaries on the field was done in the southern hemisphere summer of 2016–2017. A range of search strings were entered into Google and Google Scholar. These were ‘undergraduate journals’, ‘undergraduate research journal’, ‘student run journals’, ‘undergraduate student research journals’, ‘student research journals articles’, and ‘student run journals. These search strings produced 17 relevant review articles. Excluded articles were those that did not specifically focus on undergraduate journals and discussed undergraduate education more broadly. A thematic review of these papers was conducted to gain a description of the processes in setting up and maintaining a journal, as well as the perceived value of undergraduate journals.

2.1. Description of Scoping Data

This paper thematically synthesised content from 17 scoping articles (Table 1) that were published between 1979 and 2016, with all but one published after 2004. In total, these articles reviewed 91 URJs that were either based in Europe or the United States of America. Five of these articles [1,6,8,9,10] are multi-journal literature reviews with each review considering between 8 and 42 URJs. Two of the five had a broad focus [1,9], encapsulating various types of journals in their review. Three literature reviews focused on single field (i.e., political science [8], science [6], and psychology [10]). Eleven articles [2,3,4,5,7,11,12,13,14,15,16] reviewed one or two URJs. The aims of the articles varied. For example, some were instructional papers on how to set up an URJ [11,16], others reviewed the features of existing journals [5,6,8,9,12,14,15], and a few recorded the reported experiences of individuals who had participated in an URJ [2,3,7,13,14].

2.2. Scoping Themes

The following summarises the key characteristics and issues in the reviewed articles with regard to four major themes (i.e., ‘academic characteristics’, ‘publication process’, ‘organisational infrastructure’, and ‘academic impact’).

2.2.1. Academic Characteristics

The aims of URJs generally focus on teaching research practices, showcasing undergraduate work, providing future students with an example of high calibre research, gaining experience of the peer-review process, and establishing career profiles [4,5,6,15]. Scope is either inter- or multi-disciplinary or specialised on a single subject [9,12]. Common subjects include biology or natural sciences, chemistry, physics, psychology, and mathematics [6,9,14]. Humanities subjects are also well represented, including economics, political science, international affairs, philosophy, history, English and language studies [9]. Article types are similar to professional journals with empirical studies, literature reviews, and special features [10]. A few URJs limit contributions to original empirical research [10,11] while others publish a range from any student-authored submission regardless of quality to only quality-assured work [2,6,13,14,15].

2.2.2. Publication Processes

Not all URJs are fully student-run, with many having faculty as advisors or editor-in-chief [5,8,9,14]. The challenge in having faculty involvement, understandably, is the relative low priority in career advancement for such service [1]. Consequently, it is important that faculty train students in the arts of reviewing and editing [11]. Because review and edit work is considerable for student volunteers [1,8,11], incentives for involvement (e.g., course credit or embedded as coursework) are offered [4,6,8,11]. Financial rewards to undergraduate student authors have been used in some journals [1,5].
Ensuring longevity is a challenge for URJs because when supportive faculty leave an institution, it is easy for a journal to wither and cease [1,3,5]. Nonetheless, continuation over the long haul is feasible [6] with BIOS—A Quarterly Journal Undergraduate Biology having been published since 1930. Single-subject journals have been suggested as having greater longevity [1], though this has not been tested.
Online formats have now more or less superseded print [6,8] because of the diversity of content possible (i.e., multi-media content), cost efficiency, the capacity to broaden readership [1,2,8,15], and the much reduced costs relative to printing journals [7,14,17]. However, print versions can be good for marketing and prestige [11]. Frequency of publication ranges from no set schedule [9,12] to annual issues [6,8,9] and multiple issues per year [6,9]. Publication with the assistance of the institutional library has been noted as a positive factor [3,12]. Given that even online journals have technology costs (e.g., web hosting), funding is usually required; sources include the sponsoring institution or student organisations, outside organisations, and even paid advertisements [3,6,8]. Institutional enthusiasm for a journal is considered more essential than financial support as this ensures readership and collaborative faculty and students [11].

2.2.3. Organisational Infrastructure

Multiple methods are used to solicit submissions, including direct email to students, posting notices around campus, posting on social media, sharing of print copies, faculty announcements to class, and word of mouth [1,5,11,14]. This marketing aspect of a journal [5,14] could attract participation from marketing and business students [11], rather than being something only contributors participate in. The decision as to who an author can be varies, with some journals only publishing students from the sponsoring institution, while others allow international contributions [8,9]. However, some journals allow recent graduates to submit their undergraduate work [11] and others, student-faculty co-authorship [5]. Many journals only accept work that had faculty endorsement for quality [5,6]. Peer review is a crucial part of formalising the publication process and adds to the reputation and credentials of undergraduate journals [1,5,11].

2.2.4. Academic Impact of Undergraduate Research Journals

Evidence for the impact of URJs is largely anecdotal. Benefits for undergraduate students who publish their work are claimed to include: curriculum vitae (CV) enhancement [1,2,3,4,5,6,9,10,12,13,14,15,16], greater competitiveness for jobs and graduate school applications [2,3,4,9,10,14], research and publication experience [2,3,4,5,6,8,9,10,11,13,14], gain career-relevant experience [1,2,3,4,6,7,8,14,15], and greater understanding of the publication process [7,13]. The opportunity to publish one’s work also seems to motivate students to up the standard of work in their courses [2,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,13,16]. Academic faculty who work on these journals also gain value through working with and mentoring high-achieving students [3,10,13]. These journals allow institutions to showcase the quality of undergraduate work conducted there [5,6,8,10,12,13,16] and to recruit and retain high quality students [2,3,11,14]. Greater cross-campus communication and collaboration is also supported [2,6,12].
Of the 17 review articles we consulted, only 5 offered some form of metric on either journal views or downloads:
  • Two issues of Undergraduate Research Journal—University of Colorado at Colorado Springs (URJ-UCCS) were viewed over 350 times [12],
  • Journal of Purdue Undergraduate Research (JPUR) had over 24,000 page views in less than a year [3],
  • The Plymouth Student Scientist received 2.2 million hits in 12 months [13].
  • 500 downloads of The Journal of Huddersfield Student Research in two months [9],
  • Over 13,000 downloads at Journal of Purdue Undergraduate Research in less than two years [3], and
  • 5363 full text downloads of Undergraduate Economic Review articles in October 2012 [7].
These statistics are important because they inform journal staff and publishers about the impact of their content. However, these statistics overlook an important question within academia, that is, whether the content influences readers sufficiently to be cited in their own writing. This question can be partially addressed through analysis of citation rates.

3. Citation Impact of Undergraduate Research Journals

3.1. Method

A primary search of citation rates for the 91 unique URJs discovered in our initial scoping review was conducted. The list was reduced to 89 journals because two journals (Origin and Biolog-E) were merged into a third journal called Bioscience Horizons. We restricted the search to these journals on the assumption that they had been in the field long enough to have made some impact. In arts, humanities, and social science professional journals, new papers are often not cited for several years from publication because of the long process of drafting, submitting, reviewing, before publication in those disciplines. We expected that by restricting our search to journals that had already been identified, there would be a higher probability of articles being cited.
These journals were then evaluated for their citation rates using Harzing’s Publish or Perish software [18]. This is a computer program that retrieves and analyses academic citations using data taken from Google Scholar computing a number of different impact indices. The Hirsch index (h-index) [19] is derived by ranking articles according to the number of times cited and finding the rank order of citation which has the same number of citations or more. This is a widely used measure of impact in the scholarly world [20]. An h-index of 10 means that the 10 most frequently cited articles each have 10 or more citations, while the 11th most cited article has fewer than 11 citations. The use of this index to evaluate journals has been proposed [21].
Google Scholar was used because it indexes all scholarly publications independent of their status. However, as a database, Google Scholar is prone to some inflation of citations because it includes citations in sources that are not peer reviewed. However, it is arguably a superior method for determining impact compared to those embedded in for-profit systems (e.g., Web of Science, Scopus) that only count articles and citations published in journals included on selective lists [22]. This is especially true for humanities and social sciences academics whose h-indices are 1.5 to 2.7 times higher under Google Scholar than in Web of Science or Scopus [23]. Furthermore, it is highly unlikely many university undergraduate journals would appear in selective database systems.
While not required, obtaining an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) suggests that the journal intends to take its place in the full panoply of published journals. Where ISSN values were provided by a publisher, these were used to ensure only articles from that journal were located. All journals were searched in the ISSN portal (https://portal.issn.org) to identify if they had an ISSN. Otherwise, the journal title within quotation marks was used. To avoid inaccurate results, each article was inspected to ensure it belonged to the relevant journal. This continued until the h-index = 0.
This analysis is restricted to the journals identified in the 17 reviewed papers. This means that some journals of similar age would not be captured by our search simply because they were not mentioned in the papers we reviewed. For example, GeoView (ISSN: 1448-6482), an online undergraduate review of geography and environmental studies, was not captured and is no longer published. Also, not in the list was Press Start (ISSN: 2055-8198), beginning in 2014, which publishes both undergraduate and postgraduate student content. Hence, we do not claim that this is a comprehensive or encyclopedic review of undergraduate research journal impact. This study is restricted to the journals that were mentioned in the previous scoping papers we reviewed.
Of the original list of 91 journals, three had been merged into one title, giving 89 possible journals. Despite extensive searches, 13 journals could not be found in Google Scholar, giving 76 journals that could be evaluated for citations. The journal start year could not be found for one of these journals, giving a final set of 75 journals (Figure 1). Among these, active journals with ISSN counted 41, another 21 active journals did not have ISSN, and 15 defunct journals had discoverable citation rates and start years.

3.2. Results

Of the 75 URJs with both a Google Scholar h-index and a discoverable start year, six had zero citations, meaning 69 journals had been cited at least once. Using all 75 journals, the median h-index was 2, the mode was 1 (seen in 19 journals), and the average h-index = 4.38, with a range of 0 to 25 (Table 2). All journals, except the Croatian Ekscentar, publish articles in English.
The first year of publication was 1930 (BIOS: A Quarterly Journal of Biology) and the most recent starting year was 2015. About two-thirds (n = 45) of the journals had been started since 2000. The Pearson correlation between start year and number of citations was not significant at r = −0.21 (p = 0.07), and with the outlier 1930 journal removed, the association was likewise not statistically significant at r = −0.01 (p = 0.93). Hence, age of journal is not meaningfully associated with how frequently articles are cited.
A total of 13 journals out of 75 (17%) of the journals with Google Scholar and start year values were no longer published. The average length of publication for these URJs was 11 years, with a range from 3 to 32. Among the currently published URJs, the average length of publication was 20 years (Median = 18 years, SD = 12.87 years), with a range from 5 to 90 years.
Among the currently published URJs in our list with a Google Scholar h-index impact factor (n = 62), those in multidisciplinary topics predominated (n = 23, 37%), followed by those in the fields of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Medical Health Sciences (STEM) (n = 20, 32%) and Humanities (i.e., arts, politics, and economics; n = 14, 23%). Psychology had five journals (8%). The Humanities journals had the biggest average h-index (Mean = 4.50, SD = 5.75, Median = 2), followed closely by the STEM journals (Mean = 4.05, SD = 4.62, Median = 2), and the Multidisciplinary journals (Mean = 4.00, SD = 3.54, Median = 3). The Psychology journals had the lowest average (Mean = 2.80, SD = 2.68, Median = 1). Given that the standard deviations in each category were so large (Figure 2), it is not surprising that ANOVA revealed there was no statistically significant difference in impact (F(3,57) = 0.18, p = 0.91).
Of the current URJs, 50 were sponsored by United States universities, 5 by student honor societies, and 11 were based outside the USA, including Canada (n = 3), United Kingdom (UK) (n = 3), Croatia (n = 2) and one each in Spain, Sweden, and Ireland. The most highly cited journal was the UK consortium journal Bioscience Horizons that was for a time published by Oxford University Press; however, publication ceased in 2018. Altogether, 11 journals had h-index ≥ 10. Of these, three were sponsored by student honor societies. The most frequently cited journal (BIOS) is the journal of the Beta Beta Beta Biological Honor Society, being published since 1930, and emphasises publication of undergraduate papers. The Psi Chi Journal is published open access by the International Honor Society in Psychology and welcomes submissions from undergraduate and graduate students, as well as faculty. These two journals also publish submissions from faculty, leaving open the possibility that the citations were to articles written by academic staff rather than students. The third journal (Undergraduate Research Journal for the Human Sciences) is sponsored by Kappa Omicron Nu the National Honor Society for Human Sciences and was published only between 2002 and 2016.
Three of the more frequently cited URJs (i.e., Journal of Young Investigators, Undergraduate Economic Review, and The Park Place Economist) are published at Illinois-Wesleyan University (IWU), a private U.S. liberal arts college. The Journal of Young Investigators (JYI) seeks to improve undergraduate science training by providing innovative, high-quality educational experiences in science writing, publication, and the peer-review process. The Undergraduate Economic Review publishes U.S. and international student content, while the Park Place Economist specialises in work from senior students at IWU. Also highly cited are the Columbia University Journal of Politics and Policy, The Plymouth Student Scientist from the University of Plymouth in England, and the no longer published Earth and Environment from University of Leeds. The Plymouth Student Scientist is an electronic journal showcasing undergraduate student research from the University of Plymouth’s STEM disciplines and was developed with external funding. It is interesting to consider that, despite the prestige of elite universities sponsoring some of these journals (e.g., Yale, Harvard, or Stanford), such sponsorship does not guarantee impact; the four journals associated with those three institutions had an average h-index = 1.75, maximum = 4.

4. Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first comprehensive analysis of citation rates for URJs. While we recognise that citation rates might not be the best way to assess impact, this review of 75 URJs, 65 of which are currently active, does indicate that almost all of them get cited at least once, meaning that they can claim to contribute to the discipline. Our analysis also shows that neither age nor field of research contribute meaningfully to citation rate. Overall impact is understandably small. Nevertheless, for student authors the impact on careers could be substantial and for sponsoring institutions and organisations the prestige impact could be substantially valuable.
This paper highlights novel information on the citation rates of URJs which were identified in a scoping review of the field conducted some time ago. This allows researchers to see that URJs not only have plausible impact on students, faculty and connected institutions, but also contribute in some degree to the scholarly world. Although URJs have usually a small impact in terms of being cited, this does not mean that they are not valuable and successful in other domains. As Weiner [3] noted, success for an undergraduate research journal does not have to be seen in a citation rate.
An important function of URJs is as a venue for initiating new scholars into the full research cycle, including peer review and publication [17,24,25]. The current study does not allow us to evaluate that impact, a matter for future research. Examining postgraduate enrolment and careers of contributing authors would more robustly identify the impact of contributing to an undergraduate research journal. An examination of the impact of participation as a co-author or advisor by academic staff on their promotion, retention, or recruitment would better evaluate the benefit of such journals.
We had anticipated that URJs would be most prevalent in STEM fields; the current study shows instead that humanities fields and multidisciplinary journals outnumber the STEM area. Of course, a future study could work with the full panoply of contemporary journals and that may well show that journals in STEM topics are most prevalent. Nonetheless, there were no mean citation rate differences among the four identified topic areas, suggesting that the specific field or topic of undergraduate research journals should not concern institutions planning to develop a new journal.
It is worth noting that in some of the U.S.-based journals, honours students and programmes are categorised as undergraduate, meaning that such students can legitimately submit papers. Elsewhere, such students may be considered postgraduate (e.g., New Zealand). If more senior students qualify for an URJ, this may contribute to more frequent citation. Nevertheless, the heterogeneity of how undergraduate status is defined may influence why some journals obtain higher citation rates. In some of these higher-ranked journals, we found that co-publication with faculty was the norm. Hence, the notion of undergraduate research is not universal across these journals. A future study could classify and analyse the impact of pure undergraduate authorship versus blended authorship.
Putting aside the influence of the nation-wide or international Honor Societies, more impact was seen among public institutions, some of which would be considered regional in terms of reputation (e.g., Illinois Wesleyan U. and Penn State Berks-Lehigh Valley College). Hence, it would seem factors other than the status of a sponsoring university contribute to citation.
An issue revealed from our investigation was the lack of longevity among URJs. Sustaining journals is challenging when reliant on the enthusiasm of individual faculty members. There are several long-term successful journal exemplars that showcase the diversity of successful formulas associated with survival. The first and oldest is the journal BIOS published by Beta Beta Beta (TriBeta) an honor society for undergraduates from Oklahoma City University, a private university historically affiliated with the United Methodist Church. The journal is dedicated to improving the understanding and appreciation of biology. As a journal its success is likely attributable to its national TriBETA society association and therefore large catchment and readership. This arrangement means there is a steady pipeline of publication material related to honor society events as well as promoting its key undergraduate source of research papers.
In terms of scholarly impact, it is necessary to note some of the challenges posed by relying on Google Scholar as a data source. Sometimes results would include articles from different journals. This is a known feature of Google Scholar that, in being inclusive, it can capture non-relevant articles [22]. Where possible, entering unique journal ISSN values ensures data accuracy, but not all journals have an ISSN. Thus, our current review is constrained by that factor. A broader search for all undergraduate research journals, albeit time-consuming, would provide a fuller picture.
We did not have time or resources to examine in detail the features of the journals with or without ISSN and with or without impact factors. It would be interesting to identify characteristics of higher impact journals to ascertain their staffing model, scope, sponsor status, funding model, authorship of highly cited papers, and so on. The field needs a deeper understanding of what makes an undergraduate research journal highly cited. Further, this review has focused almost exclusively on URJs in the English-speaking academic world; it is entirely possible that in other languages quite different patterns of citation could be evident.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, it appears that citations of URJ articles are not the purview of elite institutions, nor dependent on age of the journal or the field of research. The U.S. honor society mechanism seems specially to lend itself to generating research that is cited, although not all jurisdictions have that framework. Nonetheless, undergraduate research journals clearly do contribute to academic research because they are being cited.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.P., M.F.H., A.H. and G.T.L.B.; methodology, A.P. and G.T.L.B.; validation, A.P. and G.T.L.B.; formal analysis, G.T.L.B.; investigation, R.G.; resources, A.P.; data curation, R.G.; writing—original draft preparation, R.G.; writing—review and editing, A.P., A.H., M.F.H., and G.T.L.B.; supervision, A.P. and G.T.L.B.; project administration, A.P.; funding acquisition, A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the University of Auckland Vice-Chancellor’s Strategic Development Fund grant number 48749. The APC was funded by the publisher.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Kanel, S. Undergraduate Student Research Journals: Opportunities to Publish and Learn. Sci. Ed. 2008, 31, 78–80. [Google Scholar]
  2. Walkington, H. Developing dialogic learning space: The case of online undergraduate research journals. J. Geogr. High. Educ. 2012, 36, 547–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Weiner, S.A.; Watkinson, C. What do students learn from participation in an undergraduate research journal? Results of an assessment. J. Librariansh. Sch. Commun. 2014, 2, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Jones, L.S.; Allen, L.; Cronise, K.; Juneja, N.; Kohn, R.; Miller, A.; Nazir, A.; Patel, A.; Sweitzer, S.M.; Vickery, E.; et al. Incorporating scientific publishing into an undergraduate neuroscience course: A case study using IMPULSE. J. Undergrad. Neurosci. Educ. 2011, 9, A84–A91. [Google Scholar]
  5. Stone, G.; Jensen, K.; Beech, M. Publishing Undergraduate Research: Linking Teaching and Research through a Dedicated Peer-Reviewed Open Access Journal. J. Sch. Publ. 2016, 47, 147–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tatalovic, M. Student science publishing: An exploratory study of undergraduate science research journals and popular science magazines in the US and Europe. J. Sci. Commun. 2008, 7, A03. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Leekley, R.M.; Davis-Kahl, S.; Seeborg, M.C. Undergraduate economics journals: Learning by doing. J. Coll. Teach. Learn. 2013, 10, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Mariani, M.; Buckley, F.; Reidy, T.; Witmer, R. Promoting Student Learning and Scholarship through Undergraduate Research Journals. PS Political Sci. Politics 2013, 46, 830–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Reno, A. Electronic Undergraduate Research Journals: A Survey of Their Characteristics. Eagle Feather 2009, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ware, M.E.; Burns, S.R. Undergraduate student research journals: Opportunities for and benefits from publication. In Developing, Promoting and Sustaining the Undergraduate Research Experience in Psychology; Miller, R.L., Rycek, R.F., Balcetis, E., Barney, S.T., Beins, B.C., Burns, S.R., Smith, R., Ware, M.E., Eds.; Society for the Teaching of Psychology: Washington, DC, USA, 2008; pp. 253–256. Available online: http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/ur2008/ur2008.php (accessed on 26 August 2020).
  11. Cowell-Meyers, K.; Mainwaring, B.; Dugdale, S.; Kinney, C.; Hanson, B. So You Want to Create a Student Research Journal? How to Craft a Journal Based on Peer Learning. PS Political Sci. Politics 2015, 48, 492–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Farney, T.A.; Byerley, S.L. Publishing a Student Research Journal: A Case Study. Portal: Libr. Acad. 2010, 10, 323–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gresty, K.A.; Edwards-Jones, A. Experiencing research-informed teaching from the student perspective: Insights from developing an undergraduate e-journal. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2012, 43, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Morris, A.C.; Zheng, R.; Kulp, A.; Bokreta, M.K.; Santiago-Aviles, J. The PennScience Experience: Lessons Learned Working on an Undergraduate Research Journal. In Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education. 36th Annual Conference, San Diego, CA, USA, 27–31 October 2006. [Google Scholar]
  15. Walkington, H. Geoverse: Piloting a National e-journal of undergraduate research in Geography. Planet 2008, 20, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Watcke, R.R.; Winterfield, P. The Sociologist as Editor: “Motor City Review”: A Sociology Journal of Student Research. Teach. Sociol. 1979, 6, 420–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Deonandan, R.; Patel, P.; Winterbottom, R. A student-run peer-reviewed journal: An educational tool for students in the health sciences. Adv. Med Educ. Pract. 2012, 3, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Harzing, A.-W. Publish or Perish (Version 7.25) [Computer Software]; Tarma Software Research Ltd.: London, UK, 1990–2020. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hirsch, J.E. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 16569–16572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Hicks, D.; Wouters, P.; Waltman, L.; Rijcke, S.D.; Rafols, I. The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature 2015, 429, 429–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Braun, T.; Glänzel, W.; Schubert, A. A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics 2006, 69, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Van Aalst, J. Using Google Scholar to Estimate the Impact of Journal Articles in Education. Educ. Res. 2010, 39, 387–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Harzing, A.-W.; Alakangas, S. Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics 2016, 106, 787–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jungck, J.R.; Harris, M.; Mercuri, R.; Tusin, J. Points of View: Should Students Be Encouraged to Publish Their Research in Student-Run Publications? Undergraduates: Do Research, Publish! Cell Biol. Educ. 2004, 3, 24–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Siegel, V. Points of view: Should students be encouraged to publish their research in student-run publications? Weighing the pros and cons of undergraduate-only journal publications. Cell Biol. Educ. 2004, 3, 26–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Journal data selection process.
Figure 1. Journal data selection process.
Education 10 00338 g001
Figure 2. Citation box plot by field.
Figure 2. Citation box plot by field.
Education 10 00338 g002
Table 1. Scoping Review Sources.
Table 1. Scoping Review Sources.
Source# Journals ReviewedJournals ReviewedField
[1]Multiple12Multidisciplinary
[2]22Geography
[3]1Journal of Purdue Undergraduate Research (JPUR)Library perspective
[4]1IMPULSENeuroscience
[5]1The Journal of Huddersfield Student ResearchMultidisciplinary
[6]Multiple35Science
[7]2The Park Place Economist; The Undergraduate Economic Review.Economics
[8]Multiple13Political science
[9]Multiple42
[10]Multiple8Psychology
[11]1Clocks & CloudsPolitical science, international relations, and public policy
[12]1Undergraduate Research Journal at UCCSLibrary-run undergraduate journal
[13]1The Plymouth Student ScientistScience
[14]1PennScienceScience & Engineering
[15]1GeoverseGeography
[16]1Motor City ReviewSociology
[17]1Un-namedMedical science
Table 2. Citation analysis of 89 undergraduate research journals ranked by h-index.
Table 2. Citation analysis of 89 undergraduate research journals ranked by h-index.
JournalISSNh-IndexStart YearEnd YearSponsorWebsite
1. Bioscience Horizons (incorporating Biolog-E and Origin)1754–74312520082018Oxford University Press, UKhttps://academic.oup.com/biohorizons
2. BIOS: A Quarterly Journal of Biology0005–3155; 1943-6289171930NATriBeta honor societyhttp://www.bioone.org/loi/bios
3. Psi Chi Journal of Undergraduate Research1089–4136171996NAInternational Honor Society in Psychologyhttps://www.psichi.org/?page=journal_main#.WI_mSIU_XBK
4. Undergraduate Economic Review 172005NAIllinois Wesleyan Universityhttp://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/uer/
5. Journal of Undergraduate Study and Independent Research 16nfnfNfhttp://www.jusir.org
6. The Park Place Economist 141993NAIllinois Wesleyan Universityhttps://www.iwu.edu/economics/PPE.html
7. Columbia University Journal of Politics and Policy 131989NAColumbia Universityhttps://www.helvidius.org/
8. The Plymouth Student Scientist1754–2383112008NAUniversity of Plymouth, UKhttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/12776
9. Journal of Young Investigators 1539–4026111998NAIllinois Wesleyan Universityhttp://www.jyi.org/
10. Undergraduate Research Journal for the Human Sciences 1120022016Kappa Omicron Nu, National Honor Society for Human Scienceshttp://www.kon.org/CFP/cfp_urjhs.html
11. Earth and Environment1744–28931020052013University of Leeds, UKhttp://www.see.leeds.ac.uk/misc/ejournal/
12. Young Scholars in Writing2152–6516; 2152–652482003NAPenn State Berks-Lehigh Valley Collegehttps://youngscholarsinwriting.org/index.php/ysiw
13. Canadian Undergraduate Journal of Cognitive Science1499–7487820022016Simon Fraser University, CAhttp://www.sfu.ca/cognitive-science-old/journal/
14. Ekscentar1848–6398; 1331–493971997NAUniversity of Zagreb, Croatiahttps://hrcak.srce.hr/ekscentar
15. Lethbridge Undergraduate Research Journal1718–848272006NALethbridge University, CAhttps://lurj.org/
16. Journal of Psychological Inquiry1085–664171996NAGreat Plains Behavioral Research Associationhttps://www.psychinquiry.org/
17. MIT Undergraduate Research Journal 71981NAMIThttp://murj.mit.edu/
18. University Avenue: Undergraduate Journal of Economics 719972004Illinois-Wesleyan Universityhttps://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/uauje/
19. Berkeley Undergraduate Journal1099–533161987NAUniversity of California, Berkeleyhttps://buj.berkeley.edu/
20. Berkeley Scientific1097–0967; 2373–814661996NAUniversity of California, Berkeleyhttps://bsj.berkeley.edu/
21. UCI Undergraduate Research Journal0277–473961998NAUniversity of California, Irvinehttps://www.urop.uci.edu/journal.html
22. Caltech Undergraduate Research Journal 62001NACaltechhttps://curj.caltech.edu/
23. Electronic Journal of Undergraduate Mathematics 619952006Furman Universityhttp://math.furman.edu/~mwoodard/fuejum/content/toc.html
24. Journal of Purdue Undergraduate Research (JPUR)2158–4044; 2158–405252011NAPurdue Universityhttp://docs.lib.purdue.edu/jpur/
25. History Matters: An Undergraduate Journal of Historical Research1934–465152004NAAppalachian State Universityhttps://historymatters.appstate.edu/
26. The Politic: A Yale Undergraduate Journal of Politics1539–751342001NAYale Universityhttp://thepolitic.org/past-issues/
27. Undergraduate Research Journal at UCCS2693–391842008NAUniversity of Colorado, Colorado Springshttps://urj.uccs.edu/index.php/urj
28. Undergraduate Journal of Psychology2325–091741987NAUniversity of North Carolina Charlottehttps://journals.uncc.edu/ujop/index
29. Fields: Journal of Huddersfield Student Research 42015NAUniversity of Huddersfield, UKhttps://www.fieldsjournal.org.uk/
30. Inquiry Journal 42005NAUniversity of New Hampshirehttps://www.unh.edu/inquiryjournal/
31. Stanford Undergraduate Research Journal 42002NAStanford Universityhttp://surj.stanford.edu/
32. Princeton Bioethics Journal 419982002Princeton Universityhttps://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=13067&tip=sid&clean=0
33. The Oswald Review: An International Journal of Undergraduate Research and Criticism in the Discipline of English1520–967931999NAUniversity of South Carolinahttps://scholarcommons.sc.edu/tor/
34. Discovery: Undergraduate Research Journal2328–703932012NAUniversity of Georgiahttps://scholarworks.gsu.edu/discovery/about.html
35. Penn Bioethics Journal2150–5470; 2150–546232004NAUniversity of Pennsylvaniahttp://bioethicsjournal.com/
36. PennScience: Journal of Undergraduate Research 32009NAUniversity of Pennsylvaniahttps://www.pennscience.org/
37. MarSci 320022018University of South Carolinahttps://sites.google.com/site/marscijournal/about-me
38. American Journal of Undergraduate Research1536–4585; 2375–873222002NAOswego State University, NYhttp://www.ajuronline.org/
39. IMPULSE: An Undergraduate Journal for Neuroscience1934–336122003NAAppalachian State Universityhttps://impulse.appstate.edu/
40. Clocks & Clouds2572–314622012NAAmerican Universityhttps://edspace.american.edu/clocksandclouds/
41. Indiana University South Bend: Undergraduate Research Journal2379–561121998NAIndiana University South Bendhttps://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/iusburj
42. The Eagle Feather: A Publication for Undergraduate Scholars (TEF)2332–406622004NAUniversity of North Texashttp://eaglefeather.honors.unt.edu/
43. Pi Sigma Alpha Undergraduate Journal of Politics1556–203422001NAPi Sigma Alpha, the National Political Science Honor Society,https://www.psajournal.org/
44. University of Florida Journal of Undergraduate Research (UFJUR)1947–883621999NAUniversity of Floridajournals.fcla.edu/ufjur
45. GEOverse1758–341122008NAOxford Brookes University, UKhttp://geoverse.brookes.ac.uk/
46. Augsburg Honors Review 22008NAAugsburg Universityhttps://www.augsburg.edu/honors/honors-review/
47. BlueSci journal 22004NAUniversity of Cambridgehttps://www.bluesci.co.uk/
48. Critique: A Worldwide Journal of Student Politics 22001NAIllinois State Universityhttps://about.illinoisstate.edu/critique/
49. Georgia Political Review 22011NAUniversity of Georgiahttp://georgiapoliticalreview.com/
50. Journal of Science and Health at the University of Alabama (JOSHUA) 22002NAUniversity of Alabamahttps://joshua.ua.edu/
51. Northwestern Journal of International Affairs 21979NANorthwestern Universityhttps://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njilb/history.html
52. Journal for Undergraduate Research Opportunities (JURO) 220012018University of Georgiahttp://juro.uga.edu/2010about.html
53. Undergraduate Psychology Journal (Simon Fraser University)2368–6340; 2368–635912014NASimon Fraser University, CAhttps://www.sfu.ca/psychology/ugrad/ujp.html
54. Biologos1579–435012002NAUniversidad de la Rioja, Spainhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/revista?codigo=17616
55. Stanford Undergraduate Journal (SURJ)1751–4436; 1751–442812002NAStanford Universityhttps://surj.stanford.edu/
56. UCLA Undergraduate Science Journal (UCLA USJ)0894–616711987NAUniversity of California Los Angeleshttp://uclausj.weebly.com/
57. Texas Undergraduate Research Journal (UT Austin URJ)1538–942112002NAUniversity of Texas, Austinhttp://texasurj.com/wp/
58. Furman University Electronic Journal of Undergraduate Mathematics0022–533911995NAFurman Universityhttps://scholarexchange.furman.edu/fuejum/
59. Pittsburgh Undergraduate Review0734–314011981NAUniversity of Pittsburghhttp://purtemporarypage.weebly.com/
60. Journal of Undergraduate Chemistry Research1541–600312001NAVirginia Military Institutehttp://www.vmi.edu/academics/departments/chemistry/journal-of-undergraduate-chemistry-research/
61. Harvard Political Review0090–103211969NAHarvard Universityhttp://harvardpolitics.com/
62. Journal of Undergraduate Sciences1523–848211999NAHarvard Universityhttps://www.hcs.harvard.edu/~jus/home.html
63. Modern Psychological Studies1076–080611992NAUniversity of Tennessee Chattanoogahttps://scholar.utc.edu/mps/
64. Journal of Undergraduate Reports in Physics (JURP)0731–376412012NASociety of Physics Students (SPS) and Sigma Pi Sigma, the physics honor society.https://www.spsnational.org/jurp
65. Catalyst: Rice Undergraduate Science Review 12008NARice Universityhttp://ricecatalyst.org/
66. The Michigan Journal of Political Science 11981NAMichigan Universityhttps://mjps.polisci.lsa.umich.edu/
67. UCLA Undergraduate Psychology Journal 12013NAUniversity of California Los Angeleshttps://urjp.psych.ucla.edu/
68. The Journal of Political Research 120102016Creighton Universityhttps://www.creighton.edu/ccas/politicalscience/undergradstudents/journalofpoliticalresearch/
69. Government and Politics Review 120102016University College Cork, Irelandhttps://www.ucc.ie/en/government-and-politics/governmentandpoliticsreview/aboutthejournal/
70. Journal of Psychology and the Behavioural Sciences 1nfnfFairleigh Dickinson Universityhttps://www.fdu.edu/academics/colleges-schools/psychology/the-journal-of-psychology-and-the-behavioral-sciences/
71. Beloit Biologist 119822014Beloit Collegehttps://beloitarchives.libraryhost.com/repositories/2/accessions/418
72. The UBC Journal of International Affairs1913–9322; 1913–931402010NAUniversity of British Columbia, CAhttps://issuu.com/ubcjia
73. Meteorite: The Student Journal of Philosophy1099–876401998NAUniversity of Michiganhttps://meteorite.philosophy.lsa.umich.edu/
74. Saltman Quarterly: Undergraduate Biological Research Publication 02002NAUniversity of California San Diegohttps://sqonline.ucsd.edu/
75. The Dialectics: Journal of Leadership, Politics, and Society 02006NAPennsylvania State University, Abingtonhttps://sites.psu.edu/dialectics/
76. Journal of Undergraduate Research 01998NAUniversity of Wisconsin La Crossehttps://www.uwlax.edu/urc/jur-online/
77. Student Journal of Health Sciences1402–2230; 1402–2249019982001Linkoping University, Swedenhttps://ep.liu.se/ej/sjhs/
78. Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Undergraduate Math Journal nf2000NARose-Hulman Institute of Technologyhttps://scholar.rose-hulman.edu/rhumj/
79. The Online Journal of Undergraduate Reports in Physics nf1982NASociety of Physics Studentshttps://www.spsnational.org/jurp
80. The Xavier Journal of Politics nf2010NAXavier Universityhttps://www.xavier.edu/xjop/
81. Geoversity e-journal for Oxford Brookes University undergraduates1758–8022nfnf2011Oxford Brookes University, UKhttps://civismandcities.wordpress.com/2011/12/18/geoversity-e-journal-for-oxford-brookes-university-undergraduates/
82. Student CMJ nfNf2001Croatian Medical Journalannounced 2001 but not found
83. The Morehead Journal Electronic Journal of Applicable Mathematics nf20012007Morehead State Universityhttps://scholarworks.moreheadstate.edu/mejam_archives/
84. Biosciences Undergraduate Research at Nottingham (BURN) nf20062009University of Nottingham https://rdmc.nottingham.ac.uk/handle/internal/309
85. Chrysalis: The Murray State University Journal of Undergraduate Research nf20052010Murray State Universityhttps://campus.murraystate.edu/services/ursa/Chrysalis.html
86. Critical Theory & Social Justice Journal of Undergraduate Research nf20032011Occidental Collegehttps://scholar.oxy.edu/handle/20.500.12711/152/browse?type=issue&value=urc_student
87. Interface: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Student Research nf19732000Harvey Mudd Collegehttps://ccdl.claremont.edu/digital/collection/ija
88. Inquiry: Undergraduate Research nf20002016University of Arkansashttps://scholarworks.uark.edu/inquiry/
89. Motor City Review: A sociology journal of student research nfnfnfWayne County Community Collegenf
Note: ISSN = International Standard Serial Number (https://portal.issn.org/); NA = not applicable; CA = Canada; UK = United Kingdom; nf = not found.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gavey, R.; Harper, A.; Hill, M.F.; Phillips, A.; Brown, G.T.L. The Impact of Undergraduate Research Journals on the Scholarly World: Present but Small. Educ. Sci. 2020, 10, 338. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110338

AMA Style

Gavey R, Harper A, Hill MF, Phillips A, Brown GTL. The Impact of Undergraduate Research Journals on the Scholarly World: Present but Small. Education Sciences. 2020; 10(11):338. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110338

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gavey, Rosa, Amanda Harper, Mary F. Hill, Anthony Phillips, and Gavin T. L. Brown. 2020. "The Impact of Undergraduate Research Journals on the Scholarly World: Present but Small" Education Sciences 10, no. 11: 338. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110338

APA Style

Gavey, R., Harper, A., Hill, M. F., Phillips, A., & Brown, G. T. L. (2020). The Impact of Undergraduate Research Journals on the Scholarly World: Present but Small. Education Sciences, 10(11), 338. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110338

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop