Next Article in Journal
On Path Diagrams and the Neurophenomenal Field in Bilinguals
Next Article in Special Issue
Language Attrition and Lived Experiences of Attrition among Greek Speakers in London
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Internal and External Factors for Code-Switching: A Study of Early Multilingualism in Germany with Special Reference to Catalan as a Heritage Language
Previous Article in Special Issue
Language Contact and Borders among Pontic Greek and Cypriot Greek in Karpasia, Cyprus: Yours Don’t Match with Ours
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Variation in R-Pronouns in Moroccan and Turkish Ethnolectal Dutch and What It Tells Us

Languages 2022, 7(4), 259; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7040259
by Frans Hinskens 1,2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Languages 2022, 7(4), 259; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7040259
Submission received: 21 February 2022 / Revised: 19 September 2022 / Accepted: 26 September 2022 / Published: 11 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Investigating Language Contact and New Varieties)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment. Thank you.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper offers an analysis of a less studied feature of Dutch by ethnolinguistically diverse communities. There are fewer studies of grammatical variables as ethnolinguistic features. As such, this data is a welcome addition to the literature on ethnolects and ethnically marked features.

In order to maximize impact, this work would benefit from both reorganization, rewriting and  reworking.

I offer some general comments here and attach an annotated pdf of the paper with specific comments, questions and suggestions. Best of luck with this work!

Generally,

  • review and clean up the writing. There is a lot of awkward phrasing that obfuscates the arguments and narrative.
  • there are numerous organizational challenges. Reorganize to forefront the most relevant, interpretable results. Be sure to add text to link and narrate where the paper is going and review findings and remind the reader of results where relevant.
  • make better use of tables (include relevant numbers and analyses and figures). Figures should facilitate presentation but aren’t necessary for all contexts. Where you use them, be sure that the type of figure is best to illustrate your data. Please also include tables with the results of your analyses where you refer to them. Rework some tables to ensure you present totals and percentages that facilitate interpretation.
  • Justify the models used for analyses e.g, why include one factor at a time in a run but not others?
  • As regards the social factors, the work would benefit from better argumentation and background/grounds for arguments about style and acquisition. Why is style (and in particular audience design relevant here? Is style actually the right model? Do speakers who use this most shift? or is it more accommodation to a feature that is not subject to style shifting?)
  • Elaborate on the social factors and their context and the meaning of variation, including whether there is awareness of the feature in the community.

I include many more specific comments throughout the paper itself.

 

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment. Thank you.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop