Next Article in Journal
TORKF: A Dual-Driven Kalman Filter for Outlier-Robust State Estimation and Application to Aircraft Tracking
Previous Article in Journal
LD-DEM: Latent Diffusion with Conditional Decoding for High-Precision Planetary DEM Generation from RGB Satellite Images
Previous Article in Special Issue
Geometric Optimization of Coanda Jet Chamber Fins via Response Surface Methodology
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Multi-Objective Optimization of Transonic Variable Camber Airfoil with Leading- and Trailing-Edge Deflections Using Kriging Surrogate Model

Civil Aviation College, Shenyang Aerospace University, Shenyang 110136, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Aerospace 2025, 12(8), 659; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12080659
Submission received: 12 May 2025 / Revised: 16 July 2025 / Accepted: 23 July 2025 / Published: 24 July 2025

Abstract

To investigate the aerodynamic characteristics and multi-objective optimization of the variable camber airfoils, the influence of leading- and trailing-edge deflections on aerodynamic performance is conducted. A novel prediction model is presented using the Kriging surrogate model, with leading and trailing edge deflection angles as inputs and lift coefficients and drag coefficients as outputs. The Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA II) multi-objective optimization technique is applied to ascertain the ideal deflection parameters. The results show that upward deflection of the leading edge raises the lift, whereas downward deflection increases the value of the critical angle of attack. The deflection of the trailing edge increases the value of the critical angle of attack, while the downward deflection can enhance the lift coefficient. Appropriate upward deflections of both leading and trailing edges can delay the critical Mach number, while downward deflections of both the leading and trailing edges can enhance the value of the critical Mach number. The discrepancies between the Kriging model prediction and the CFD simulation are less than 2%. Compared to the basic airfoil, the aerodynamic performance of the optimized airfoil has been improved, with the lift coefficient increasing by 7.55% and 7.37% and the lift-to-drag ratio rising by 6.97% and 10.27% at two Mach numbers, respectively. The efficiency and reliability of this method have been verified.
Keywords: variable camber; leading and trailing edges; supercritical airfoil; kriging surrogate model; multi-objective optimization variable camber; leading and trailing edges; supercritical airfoil; kriging surrogate model; multi-objective optimization

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, W.; Feng, H.; Cui, S.; Li, Z. Multi-Objective Optimization of Transonic Variable Camber Airfoil with Leading- and Trailing-Edge Deflections Using Kriging Surrogate Model. Aerospace 2025, 12, 659. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12080659

AMA Style

Wang W, Feng H, Cui S, Li Z. Multi-Objective Optimization of Transonic Variable Camber Airfoil with Leading- and Trailing-Edge Deflections Using Kriging Surrogate Model. Aerospace. 2025; 12(8):659. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12080659

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Wei, He Feng, Shenao Cui, and Zhandong Li. 2025. "Multi-Objective Optimization of Transonic Variable Camber Airfoil with Leading- and Trailing-Edge Deflections Using Kriging Surrogate Model" Aerospace 12, no. 8: 659. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12080659

APA Style

Wang, W., Feng, H., Cui, S., & Li, Z. (2025). Multi-Objective Optimization of Transonic Variable Camber Airfoil with Leading- and Trailing-Edge Deflections Using Kriging Surrogate Model. Aerospace, 12(8), 659. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12080659

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop