Perspectives and Trends in Flight Dynamics and Simulation
1. Introduction
2. Overview of the Published Articles
3. Concluding Remarks
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Platzer, M.F. A perspective on the urgency for green aviation. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2023, 141, 100932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rupcic, L.; Pierrat, E.; Saavedra-Rubio, K.; Thonemann, N.; Ogugua, C.; Laurent, A. Environmental impacts in the civil aviation sector: Current state and guidance. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2023, 119, 103717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bridgelall, R. Aircraft innovation trends enabling advanced air mobility. Inventions 2024, 9, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scholz, A.E.; Trifonov, D.; Hornung, M. Environmental life cycle assessment and operating cost analysis of a conceptual battery hybrid-electric transport aircraft. CEAS Aeronaut. J. 2022, 13, 215–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magnacca, F. Do box-wing aircraft configurations add financial value? Results from an academic-based experience. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2025, 60, 101323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Owen, B.; Lee, D.S.; Lim, L. Flying into the future: Aviation emissions scenarios to 2050. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 2255–2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afonso, F.; Sohst, M.; Diogo, C.M.; Rodrigues, S.S.; Ferreira, A.; Ribeiro, I.; Marques, R.; Rego, F.F.; Sohouli, A.; Portugal-Pereira, J.; et al. Strategies towards a more sustainable aviation: A systematic review. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2023, 137, 100878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delbecq, S.; Fontane, J.; Gourdain, N.; Planès, T.; Simatos, F. Sustainable aviation in the context of the Paris Agreement: A review of prospective scenarios and their technological mitigation levers. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2023, 141, 100920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ploetner, K.; Rothfeld, R.; Urban, M.; Hornung, M.; Tay, G.; Oguntona, O. Technological and operational scenarios on aircraft fleet–level towards ATAG and IATA 2050 emission targets. In Proceedings of the 17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Denver, CO, USA, 5–9 June 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krein, A.; Williams, G. Flightpath 2050: Europe’s vision for aeronautics. In Innovation for Sustainable Aviation in a Global Environment; IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carrera, E.; Palaia, G.; Abu Salem, K. The green transition in commercial aviation. Rend. Lincei. Sci. Fis. E Nat. 2025, 36, 785–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ficca, A.; Marulo, F.; Sollo, A. An open thinking for a vision on sustainable green aviation. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2023, 141, 100928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, J.; Williams, P.D.; Guerrini, F.; Venturini, M. Quantifying the effects of climate change on aircraft take-off performance at European airports. Aerospace 2025, 12, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwartz, E.; Kroo, I. Aircraft design for reduced climate impact. In Proceedings of the 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Orlando, FL, USA, 4–7 January 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, H.; Xiao, K.; Pan, J.; Fu, Q.; Wei, X.; Zhou, J.; Yu, Y.; Hu, X.; Ren, H.; Cheng, J.; et al. Evidence of aircraft activity impact on local air quality: A study in the context of uncommon airport operation. J. Environ. Sci. 2023, 125, 603–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jagtap, S.S.; Childs, P.R.; Stettler, M.E. Conceptual design-optimisation of a future hydrogen-powered ultrahigh bypass ratio geared turbofan engine. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 95, 317–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palaia, G.; Abu Salem, K.; Carrera, E. Preliminary performance analysis of medium-range liquid hydrogen-powered box-wing aircraft. Aerospace 2024, 11, 379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagarello, S.; Campagna, D.; Benedetti, I. A survey on hydrogen tanks for sustainable aviation. Green Energy Intell. Transp. 2025, 4, 100224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cusati, V.; Corcione, S.; Nicolosi, F.; Zhang, Q. Improvement of take-off performance for an electric commuter aircraft due to distributed electric propulsion. Aerospace 2023, 10, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bergmann, D.P.; Denzel, J.; Baden, A.; Kugler, L.; Strohmayer, A. Innovative scaled test platform e-genius-mod—Scaling methods and systems design. Aerospace 2019, 6, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abu Salem, K.; Palaia, G.; Quarta, A.A. Review of hybrid-electric aircraft technologies and designs: Critical analysis and novel solutions. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2023, 141, 100924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pattanayak, T.; Mavris, D. Battery technology for sustainable aviation: A review of current trends and future prospects. Appl. Energy 2025, 397, 126356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reid, S.J.; Perez, R.E.; Jansen, P.W. Hybrid electric aircraft design with optimal power management. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2024, 154, 109479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magrini, A.; Benini, E. Multi-fidelity modelling of a high bypass ratio turbofan engine with variable area nozzle. Propuls. Power Res. 2025, 14, 227–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skrna, D.; de Rosa Jacinto, M.; Berens, M. Investigation of the Combined Application of Leading-Edge Tubercles and Trailing-Edge Serration on AAM Propellers in Terms of Aeroacoustics Using Lattice-Boltzmann Method. In Proceedings of the AIAA SciTech Forum, Orlando, FL, USA, 6–10 January 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abu Salem, K.; Palaia, G.; Bravo-Mosquera, P.D.; Quarta, A.A. A review of novel and non-conventional propulsion integrations for next-generation aircraft. Designs 2024, 8, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bravo-Mosquera, P.D.; Cerón-Muñoz, H.D.; Catalano, F.M. Potential propulsive and aerodynamic benefits of a new aircraft concept: A low-speed experimental study. Aerospace 2023, 10, 651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Battiston, A.; Magrini, A.; Ponza, R.; Benini, E. Design Optimization of Rear-Fuselage Boundary-Layer Ingestion Shrouded Propulsor. J. Aircr. 2025, 62, 602–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bijewitz, J.; Seitz, A.; Hornung, M.; Isikveren, A.T. Progress in optimizing the propulsive fuselage aircraft concept. J. Aircr. 2017, 54, 1979–1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fard, M.T.; He, J.; Huang, H.; Cao, Y. Aircraft distributed electric propulsion technologies—A review. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2022, 8, 4067–4090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Rosa, D.; Morales Tirado, E.; Mingione, G. Parametric investigation of a distributed propulsion system on a regional aircraft. Aerospace 2022, 9, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abu Salem, K.; Palaia, G.; Frediani, A.; Carrera, E. The box-wing configuration: A critical review of design approaches and applications. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2025, 157, 101108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okonkwo, P.; Smith, H. Review of evolving trends in blended wing body aircraft design. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2016, 82, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Norczyk Simon, P.; Cavallaro, R. Local Air Quality and Noise Improvements via Optimization of Strut-Braced Wings with Distributed Electric Propulsion. In Proceedings of the AIAA SciTech Forum, Orlando, FL, USA, 6–10 January 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khorasani, M.; Ghasemi, A.; Rolfe, B.; Gibson, I. Additive manufacturing a powerful tool for the aerospace industry. Rapid Prototyp. J. 2022, 28, 87–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soni, R.; Verma, R.; Garg, R.K.; Sharma, V. A critical review of recent advances in the aerospace materials. Mater. Today Proc. 2024, 113, 180–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guida, M.; Marulo, F.; Abrate, S. Advances in crash dynamics for aircraft safety. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2018, 98, 106–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, M.; Xue, Y.; Wang, K. Research on the determination method of aircraft flight safety boundaries based on adaptive control. Electronics 2022, 11, 3595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corcione, S.; De Marco, A.; Cusati, V. A data-driven methodology to predict ice-induced aerodynamic degradation applied to aircraft tailplane design. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 2025, 38, 103476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Y.; Guo, J.; Ying, P.; Zeng, G.; Chen, N. Nonlinear control of a single tail tilt servomotor tri-rotor ducted VTOL-UAV. Aerospace 2022, 9, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiong, M.; Wang, H.; Fu, Q.; Xu, Y. Digital twin–driven aero-engine intelligent predictive maintenance. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2021, 114, 3751–3761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stanton, I.; Munir, K.; Ikram, A.; El-Bakry, M. Predictive maintenance analytics and implementation for aircraft: Challenges and opportunities. Syst. Eng. 2023, 26, 216–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cusati, V.; Corcione, S.; Memmolo, V. Impact of structural health monitoring on aircraft operating costs by multidisciplinary analysis. Sensors 2021, 21, 6938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Van der Laan, T.; van den Berg, T. An open source part cost estimation tool for MDO purposes. In Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation Forum, Virtual Event, 2–6 August 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.; Wandelt, S.; Sun, X.; Yang, Y.; Jin, X.; Karichery, S.; Drwal, M. Machine-Learning-Assisted optimization of aircraft trajectories under realistic constraints. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 2023, 46, 1814–1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marciello, V.; Cusati, V.; Nicolosi, F.; Saavedra-Rubio, K.; Pierrat, E.; Thonemann, N.; Laurent, A. Evaluating the economic landscape of hybrid-electric regional aircraft: A cost analysis across three time horizons. Energy Convers. Manag. 2024, 312, 118517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murrieta-Mendoza, A.; Botez, R.M. Commercial aircraft trajectory optimization to reduce flight costs and pollution: Metaheuristic algorithms. In Advances in Visualization and Optimization Techniques for Multidisciplinary Research: Trends in Modelling and Simulations for Engineering Applications; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 33–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosenow, J.; Lindner, M.; Scheiderer, J. Advanced flight planning and the benefit of in-flight aircraft trajectory optimization. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murrieta-Mendoza, A.; Hamy, A.; Botez, R.M. Four-and three-dimensional aircraft reference trajectory optimization inspired by ant colony optimization. J. Aerosp. Inf. Syst. 2017, 14, 597–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grazioso, G.; De Marco, A.; Della Vecchia, P.; Di Stasio, M.; Trifari, V.; Nicolosi, F. A simulation-based mission optimization approach for regional transport hybrid-electric aircraft. Appl. Energy 2025, 402, 126869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonnin, V.O.; Hoogreef, M.F. Exploration of Off-Design Performance for Hybrid Electric Regional Aircraft. J. Aircr. 2025, 62, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donelli, G.; Mello, J.M.; Odaguil, F.I.; Lefebvre, T.; Bartoli, N.; van der Laan, T.; Boggero, L.; Nagel, B. A value-driven quantitative framework coupling aircraft design, manufacturing and supply chain by leveraging the AGILE 4.0 MBSE-MDO framework. In Proceedings of the 33rd ICAS Congress, Stockholm, Sweden, 4–9 September 2022; Available online: https://hal.science/hal-03954784/document (accessed on 24 November 2025).
- Tai, S.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; Bu, C.; Yue, T. Flight dynamics modeling and aerodynamic parameter identification of four-degree-of-freedom virtual flight test. AIAA J. 2023, 61, 2652–2665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Zhao, R.; Xu, K.; Zhang, Y.; Yue, T. Identification and Modeling Method of Longitudinal Stall Aerodynamic Parameters of Civil Aircraft Based on Improved Kirchhoff Stall Aerodynamic Model. Aerospace 2023, 10, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abu Salem, K.; Palaia, G.; Quarta, A.A.; Chiarelli, M.R. Preliminary analysis of the stability and controllability of a box-wing aircraft configuration. Aerospace 2023, 10, 874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, Y.; Xie, J.; Harrison, E.; Mavris, D. Assessment of longitudinal stability-and-control characteristics of hybrid wing body aircraft in conceptual design. In Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation Forum, Virtual Event, 2–6 August 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goetzendorf-Grabowski, T. Flight dynamics of unconventional configurations. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2023, 137, 100885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guimarães, T.A.; Cesnik, C.E.; Kolmanovsky, I.V. An Integrated Low-Speed Aeroelastic-Flight-Dynamics Framework for Modeling Supersonic Aircraft. In Proceedings of the AIAA SciTech Forum, San Diego, CA, USA, 3–7 January 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Marco, A.; Trifari, V.; Nicolosi, F.; Ruocco, M. A simulation-based performance analysis tool for aircraft design workflows. Aerospace 2020, 7, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chakraborty, I.; Comer, A.M.; Bhandari, R.; Mishra, A.A.; Schaller, R.; Sizoo, D.; McGuire, R. Flight simulation based assessment of simplified vehicle operations for urban air mobility. In Proceedings of the AIAA SciTech Forum, National Harbor, MD, USA, 23–27 January 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abu Salem, K.; Palaia, G.; Chiarelli, M.R.; Bianchi, M. A simulation framework for aircraft take-off considering ground effect aerodynamics in conceptual design. Aerospace 2023, 10, 459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Humphreys-Jennings, C.; Lappas, I.; Sovar, D.M. Conceptual design, flying, and handling qualities assessment of a blended wing body (BWB) aircraft by using an engineering flight simulator. Aerospace 2020, 7, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Liu, S.; Tian, Y. Flight Simulation of Fire-Fighting Aircraft Based on Multi-Factor Coupling Modeling of Forest Fire. Aerospace 2024, 11, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flight Dynamics, Control, & Simulation (2nd Edition), Aerospace, Special Issue, 2024. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/aerospace/special_issues/4J6U8C7679 (accessed on 24 November 2025).
- Li, R.; Yang, Z.; Yan, G.; Jian, L.; Li, G.; Li, Z. Robust Approximate Optimal Trajectory Tracking Control for Quadrotors. Aerospace 2024, 11, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karahan, K.; Cadirci, S. Investigation of Fluid Dynamics in Various Aircraft Wing Tank Designs Using 1D and CFD Simulations. Aerospace 2024, 11, 519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Villarreal-Valderrama, F.; Liceaga-Castro, E.; Hernandez-Alcantara, D.; Santana-Delgado, C.; Ekici, S.; Amezquita-Brooks, L. Control-Oriented System Identification of Turbojet Dynamics. Aerospace 2024, 11, 630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazhar, M.F.; Wasim, M.; Abbas, M.; Riaz, J.; Swati, R.F. Aircraft System Identification Using Multi-Stage PRBS Optimal Inputs and Maximum Likelihood Estimator. Aerospace 2025, 12, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bae, J.-J.; Kang, J.-Y. Quaternion-Based Robust Sliding-Mode Controller for Quadrotor Operation Under Wind Disturbance. Aerospace 2025, 12, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sereez, M.; Goman, M.; Abramov, N.; Lambert, C. Numerical Simulation of Self-Sustained Roll Oscillations of an 80-Degree Delta Wing Caused by Leading-Edge Vortices. Aerospace 2025, 12, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Selyutskiy, Y.; Dosaev, M.; Lokshin, B.; Fekete, G. On Dynamics of a Copter-Slung Spherical Payload Partially Filled with Liquid. Aerospace 2025, 12, 408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, D.; Wang, Q.; Chen, Q.; He, L. Symbolic Regression-Based Modeling for Aerodynamic Ground-to-Flight Deviation Laws of Aerospace Vehicles. Aerospace 2025, 12, 455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, H.; Li, S.; Li, K.; Chen, J. Addressing Calibration Challenges for Large-Stroke Blade Pitch Control in Tiltrotor Aircraft via an Improved Cubic Polynomial Fitting Algorithm. Aerospace 2025, 12, 843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takahashi, T.T.; Griffin, J.A.; Grandhi, R.V. High-Speed Aircraft Stability and Control Metrics. Aerospace 2025, 12, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, P.; Cui, P.; Gao, C. Composite Actuation and Adaptive Control for Hypersonic Reentry Vehicles: Mitigating Aerodynamic Ablation via Moving Mass-Aileron Integration. Aerospace 2025, 12, 773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flight Dynamics, Control, & Simulation (3rd Edition), Aerospace, Special Issue, 2025. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/aerospace/special_issues/058YXX1B2B (accessed on 24 November 2025).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Salem, K.A. Perspectives and Trends in Flight Dynamics and Simulation. Aerospace 2025, 12, 1080. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12121080
Salem KA. Perspectives and Trends in Flight Dynamics and Simulation. Aerospace. 2025; 12(12):1080. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12121080
Chicago/Turabian StyleSalem, Karim Abu. 2025. "Perspectives and Trends in Flight Dynamics and Simulation" Aerospace 12, no. 12: 1080. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12121080
APA StyleSalem, K. A. (2025). Perspectives and Trends in Flight Dynamics and Simulation. Aerospace, 12(12), 1080. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12121080
