Next Article in Journal
Ecoenergetic Comparison of HVAC Systems in Data Centers
Next Article in Special Issue
Climate Services for Renewable Energy in the Nordic Electricity Market
Previous Article in Journal
Observed and Projected Changes in Temperature and Precipitation in the Core Crop Region of the Humid Pampa, Argentina
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sharing Lisboa: A Digital Social Market to Promote Sustainable and Energy Efficient Behaviours
Open AccessCommunication

Who Is Responsible for Embodied CO2?

Department of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
Climate 2021, 9(3), 41;
Received: 24 February 2021 / Accepted: 1 March 2021 / Published: 2 March 2021
With the Paris Agreement, countries are obliged to report greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions, which will ensure that the global temperature increase is maintained well below 2 °C. The parties will report their nationally determined contributions (NDCs) in terms of plans and progress towards these targets during the postponed COP26 (Conference of the Parties under the UNFCCC) in Glasgow in November 2021. These commitments, however, do not take significant portions of the consumption-related emissions related to countries imports into account. Similarly, the majority of companies that report their emissions to CDP (Formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) also do not account for their embodied value-chain-related emissions. Municipalities, on the path towards carbon neutrality in accordance with the methods outlined by C40, also do not include imported and embodied CO2 in their total emission tallies. So, who is responsible for these emissions—the producer or the consumer? How can we ensure that the NDCs, municipalities’ and companies’ reduction targets share the responsibility of the emissions in the value chain, thus ensuring that targets and plans become sustainable, climate fair, and just in global value chains? Today the responsibility lays with the producer, which is not sustainable. We have the outline for the tools needed to quantify and transparently share the responsibility between producers and consumers at corporate, municipal and national levels based on an improved understanding of the attendant sources, causes, flows and risks of GHG emissions globally. Hybrid life cycle analysis/environmentally extended input–output (LCA/EEIO) models can for example be further developed. This will, in the end, enable everyday consumption to support a more sustainable, green and low carbon transition of our economy. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustainability; climate; trade; models; emissions; value chain; justice sustainability; climate; trade; models; emissions; value chain; justice
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Sanderson, H. Who Is Responsible for Embodied CO2? Climate 2021, 9, 41.

AMA Style

Sanderson H. Who Is Responsible for Embodied CO2? Climate. 2021; 9(3):41.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sanderson, Hans. 2021. "Who Is Responsible for Embodied CO2?" Climate 9, no. 3: 41.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop