Next Article in Journal
Exploring Adaptation Strategies to Mitigate Climate Threats to Transportation Infrastructure in Nigeria: Lagos City, as a Case Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Can Climate Transition Risks Enhance Enterprise Green Innovation? An Analysis Employing a Dual Regulatory Mechanism
Previous Article in Journal
Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions and Economic Growth in the Visegrád Region: A Study Based on the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Key Innovations in Financing Nature-Based Solutions for Coastal Adaptation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

An AI-Enhanced Systematic Review of Climate Adaptation Costs: Approaches and Advancements, 2010–2021

by
Riccardo Boero
NILU—The Climate and Environmental Research Institute, Environmental Impacts and Sustainability Department (IMPACT), P.O. Box 100, NO-2027 Kjeller, Norway
Climate 2024, 12(8), 116; https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12080116
Submission received: 1 July 2024 / Revised: 30 July 2024 / Accepted: 4 August 2024 / Published: 7 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Climate Change Adaptation Costs and Finance)

Abstract

This study addresses the critical global challenge of climate adaptation by assessing the inadequacies in current methodologies for estimating adaptation costs. Broad assessments reveal a significant investment shortfall in adaptation strategies, highlighting the necessity for precise cost analysis to guide effective policy-making. By employing the PRISMA 2020 protocol and enhancing it with the prismAId tool, this review systematically analyzes the recent evolution of cost assessment methodologies using state-of-the-art generative AI. The AI-enhanced approach facilitates rapid and replicable research extensions. The analysis reveals a significant geographical and sectoral disparity in research on climate adaptation costs, with notable underrepresentation of crucial areas and sectors that are most vulnerable to climate impacts. The study also highlights a predominant reliance on secondary data and a lack of comprehensive uncertainty quantification in economic assessments, suggesting an urgent need for methodological enhancements. It concludes that extending analyses beyond merely verifying that benefits exceed costs is crucial for supporting effective climate adaptation. By assessing the profitability of adaptation investments, it becomes possible to prioritize these investments not only against similar interventions but also across the broader spectrum of public spending.
Keywords: climate change adaptation; cost assessment; systematic literature review; generative AI; open science climate change adaptation; cost assessment; systematic literature review; generative AI; open science

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Boero, R. An AI-Enhanced Systematic Review of Climate Adaptation Costs: Approaches and Advancements, 2010–2021. Climate 2024, 12, 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12080116

AMA Style

Boero R. An AI-Enhanced Systematic Review of Climate Adaptation Costs: Approaches and Advancements, 2010–2021. Climate. 2024; 12(8):116. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12080116

Chicago/Turabian Style

Boero, Riccardo. 2024. "An AI-Enhanced Systematic Review of Climate Adaptation Costs: Approaches and Advancements, 2010–2021" Climate 12, no. 8: 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12080116

APA Style

Boero, R. (2024). An AI-Enhanced Systematic Review of Climate Adaptation Costs: Approaches and Advancements, 2010–2021. Climate, 12(8), 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12080116

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop