Next Article in Journal
Genetic Resources of Cereal and Oilseed Crops for Heterotic Hybrid Breeding
Next Article in Special Issue
Uptake and Translocation of Heavy Metals in Maize Leaves Exposed to Atmospheric Fallout
Previous Article in Journal
A Green and Innovative Waste Valorization Approach for Extraction of Flavonoids from Grapefruit Peels by Microwave-Assisted Pressurized CO2-H2O Extraction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Cadmium on the Accumulation and Phytotoxicity of Uranium in Radish (Raphanus sativus L.) Seedlings
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 14
Issue 22
10.3390/plants14223411
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dopamine Spraying Protects Against Cadmium-Induced Oxidative Stress and Stimulates Photosynthesis in Soybean Plants

by
Andreza Sousa Carmo
1,
Caio Victor da Silva Pontes
1,
Caroline Cristine Augusto
2,
Bruno Lemos Batista
2 and
Allan Klynger da Silva Lobato
1,*
1
Núcleo de Pesquisa Vegetal Básica e Aplicada, Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia, Paragominas 68627-451, PA, Brazil
2
Centro de Ciências Naturais e Humanas, Universidade Federal do ABC, Santo André 09280-560, SP, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2025, 14(22), 3411; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14223411
Submission received: 5 September 2025 / Revised: 29 October 2025 / Accepted: 4 November 2025 / Published: 7 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue In Vivo and In Vitro Studies on Heavy Metal Tolerance in Plants)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

Cadmium (Cd) is a non-essential element that induces reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and damages the photosynthetic apparatus. Dopamine (DOP) is a neurotransmitter that plays a role in metabolism as an antioxidant. This research aimed to investigate whether exogenous DOP mitigates Cd-induced oxidative stress in soybean by assessing antioxidant metabolism, stress indicators, nutritional status, pigments, chlorophyll fluorescence, gas exchange, and biomass. The experiment was randomized with four treatments: two with Cd concentrations (0 and 500 µM Cd, described as—Cd and +Cd, respectively) and two DOP levels (0 and 100 µM DOP described as—DOP and +DOP, respectively). DOP mitigated Cd-induced damage by enhancing the antioxidant system and protecting the photosynthetic apparatus. This neurotransmitter positively modulated the enzymes superoxide dismutase (38%), catalase (27%), ascorbate peroxidase (23%), and peroxidase (31%), alleviating Cd-induced oxidative stress. In addition, DOP promoted increases in the effective quantum yield of PSII photochemistry (26%), photochemical quenching coefficient (18%), and electron transport rate (26%). Simultaneously, the neurotransmitter stimulated increases in the net photosynthetic rate (29%), stomatal conductance (35%), water use efficiency (38%), and instantaneous carboxylation efficiency (39%). Our results indicate that DOP exogenous increases tolerance to Cd-induced stress in soybean plants.

1. Introduction

Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] is one of the most important crops in the world due to the high protein contents, oil, and carbohydrates present in seeds and grains, which makes cultivation essential for food production, animal feed, and industrial products [1,2]. Brazil is the world’s largest crop producer, followed by the USA and Argentina [3]. In the 2023–2024 harvest, approximately 46.1 thousand hectares of Brazilian territory were allocated to legume cultivation, producing 147.7 thousand tons [4]. However, this crop is frequently exposed to environmental stresses in the central producing regions worldwide that compromise yield [5], such as soil contamination by heavy metals in areas with high agricultural and mining activity [6]. In general, soybean plants exhibit low tolerance to heavy metal stress, which severely affects plant performance [7].
Cadmium (Cd) is a non-essential metallic element for plant growth, phytotoxic even in low concentrations, being harmful to human and animal health and causing deleterious effects in agriculture [8,9]. It has high solubility in the soil and is easily absorbed by plant roots and transported to shoots [10]. The root, the main organ for nutrient uptake, is also the first tissue affected by Cd stress, which reduces its growth and compromises the plant’s nutritional status [11,12]. This effect arises from ionic competition at the root surface [13], where Cd2+ competes with essential elements, particularly divalent cations, for transport channels, leading to disturbances in nutrient assimilation and in the specific functions of these elements [14].
Cd-stressed plants exhibit physiological, biochemical, and molecular changes [15]. At the biochemical level, this metal stimulates the synthesis of reactive oxygen species (ROS), causing damage to the permeability and functions of cells [16,17,18]. In response to the overproduction of ROS, plants developed a redox detoxification system, based on antioxidant defense mechanisms by increasing the superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POX), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activities, which act to preserve homeostasis at the cellular level [19]. In a physiological context, Cd toxicity can negatively interfere with the photosynthetic system, causing damage to the light collection complex, photosystems I and II, and enzyme activities involved in the Calvin cycle [20,21]. In general, oxidative stress causes damage to chloroplast structures, reduces stomatal conductance, interrupts chlorophyll synthesis, and consequently reduces the photosynthetic rate [22], resulting in a decrease in biomass accumulation and affecting plant growth and survival [22].
Dopamine (DOP), like norepinephrine and epinephrine, belongs to the group of catecholamines and is considered a biogenic amine [23]. Catecholamines play an essential role as neuromodulators or neurotransmitters in plants, animals, and humans [24]. DOP, a water-soluble antioxidant, is a secondary metabolite with high antioxidant capacity that enhances the adaptability of plants to stresses [25]. Exogenous application of DOP has been reported in recent studies to be efficient in alleviating biotic and abiotic stresses, including drought [26], salinity [27], nutritional deficiency [28], alkalinity [29], heavy metals [30], waterlogging [31], cold [32], organic pollutants [33] and diseases [34]. It frequently enhances stress tolerance by positively regulating nutrient uptake, transport, and assimilation [35], improving gas exchange, photosynthetic pigments, and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters [36], as well as boosting antioxidant enzyme activities, reducing ROS accumulation [37], and protecting cells from lipid peroxidation [38].
It is hypothesized that Cd excess induces the overproduction of ROS, thereby interfering with the functioning of the photosynthetic machinery [39]. However, the DOP molecule plays an antioxidant role in metabolism, representing an interesting opportunity to prevent oxidative stress in plants [40,41,42]. Considering that the literature does not provide results on DOP roles in soybean plants under Cd stress and recurrent environmental contamination by heavy metals, this study aimed to investigate whether the exogenous application of DOP can mitigate oxidative stress and the repercussions on the photosynthetic apparatus in soybean plants under Cd intoxication, evaluating responses associated with antioxidant metabolism, stress indicators, nutritional status, photosynthetic pigments, chlorophyll fluorescence, gas exchange, and biomass.

2. Results

2.1. DOP Minimized Cd Concentrations in Plants Exposed to Toxicity

Plants treated with 500 µM Cd2+ showed increased Cd contents in their tissues (Table 1). However, plants subjected to treatment with 500 μM Cd2+ associated with 100 μM DOP presented significant reductions in contents of this metal by 60%, 29%, and 38% in the root, stem, and leaf, respectively, when compared to the treatment with 500 μM Cd2+.

2.2. Neurotransmitter Positively Regulates Nutrient Contents

Cd excess caused reductions in nutrient contents in the root, stem, and leaf (Table 2). However, plants subjected to treatment with DOP and Cd2+ increased potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn), iron (Fe), and zinc (Zn) contents by 34%, 37%, 22%, 58%, 57% and 26% (root), 19%, 24%, 51%, 37%, 35% and 18% (stem), and 20%, 16%, 25%, 23%, 22% and 12% (leaf), in this order, compared to plants treated with Cd alone.

2.3. DOP Alleviated the Cd Impacts on Photosynthetic Apparatus

Cd excess caused reductions in photosynthetic pigments (Table 3). However, treatment with 100 µM DOP in plants stressed by Cd2+ promoted significant increases of 37%, 45%, 39%, and 45% in chlorophyll a (Chl a), chlorophyll b (Chl b), total chlorophyll (Total Chl), and Carotenoids (Car), respectively, compared to plants treated only with Cd. Regarding chlorophyll fluorescence, Cd excess promoted reductions (p < 0.05) in the values of maximal fluorescence yield of the dark-adapted state (Fm), variable fluorescence (Fv), and maximal quantum yield of PSII photochemistry (Fv/Fm) (Figure 1), while minimal fluorescence yield of the dark-adapted state (F0) did not show significant changes. However, the combination of DOP and Cd2+ occasioned increases of 8%, 12%, and 3% in Fm, Fv, and Fv/Fm, in this order, and a 3% reduction in F0 about treatment with Cd alone. Furthermore, plants treated with Cd suffered reductions in effective quantum yield of PSII photochemistry (ΦPSII), photochemical quenching (qP), and electron transport rate (ETR) and increases in nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ), relative energy excess at the PSII level (EXC), and ratio between the apparent electron transport rate and net photosynthetic rate (ETR/PN) (Table 3). However, Dopamine-treated plants exposed to excess Cd promoted increases of 26%, 18%, and 26% in ΦPSII, qP, and ETR, respectively, and reductions of 6%, 13%, and 2% in NPQ, EXC, and ETR/PN, respectively, compared with plants exposed to the same Cd treatment without dopamine. For gas exchange, plants subjected to excess Cd showed reductions (p < 0.05) in net photosynthetic rate (PN), stomatal conductance (gs), water-use efficiency (WUE), and instantaneous carboxylation efficiency (PN/Ci) and increases in transpiration rate (E) and intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) (Table 3). However, when plants under Cd2+ stress were sprayed with DOP, there were increases of 29%, 35%, 38%, and 39% in PN, gs, WUE, and PN/Ci, respectively, and decreases in both variables (E and Ci) were 6%, in the treatment with 500 μM Cd2+.

2.4. Benefits in Antioxidant Defense and Lower ROS Concentrations Induced by DOP

The activities of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, APX, and POX) had significant increases when subjected to Cd stress (Figure 2). However, treatment with 100 µM DOP combined with 500 µM Cd2+ resulted in increases (p < 0.05) in SOD, CAT, APX and POX activities of 38%, 27%, 23% and 31%, respectively, compared to the same treatment in the absence of DOP. Regarding stress indicators, excess Cd stimulated the ROS accumulation (Figure 3). However, spraying DOP on plants stressed with Cd caused significant reductions in the levels of oxidative compounds superoxide (O2−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), malondialdehyde (MDA), and electrolyte leakage (EL) of 28%, 14%, 23% and 6%, respectively, when compared to plants treated with Cd alone.

2.5. DOP Mitigated the Impacts Caused by Cd Excess on Biomass

Biomass was significantly reduced in plants exposed to Cd excess (Figure 4 and Figure 5). However, DOP sprayed in plants stressed with Cd2+ induced increases in leaf dry matter (LDM), root dry matter (RDM), stem dry matter (SDM), and total dry matter (TDM) of 89%, 67%, 98%, and 89%, respectively, compared to plants exposed only to Cd excess.

3. Discussion

Cd concentrations detected in soybean plants’ leaves, stems, and roots demonstrate the toxicity induced by the exogenous application of 500 μM Cd. On the other hand, spraying 100 μM DOP induced reductions in Cd contents, highlighting the role of this neurotransmitter and attenuating the toxic effects caused by this heavy metal. Dopamine alleviates Cd-induced stress by regulating the expression of genes involved in metal uptake and detoxification. In particular, overexpression of the MdTyDC gene, associated with neurotransmitter synthesis, helps reduce Cd2+ transport to the shoots [43]. Similarly, the application of 100 μM DOP in Malus hupehensis mitigated Cd stress, reducing the concentration and accumulation of this metal [44]. Cd overaccumulation in the root is a mechanism of plant tolerance to toxicity. Often, plants exposed to Cd excess restrict the metal in the roots, reducing its translocation to the shoot of the plants [45,46], corroborating our results with higher concentrations in root tissue. High Cd levels in Eucalyptus urophylla plants promoted immobilization of this metal in the roots, reducing Cd levels in leaves and stems [47].
Plants exposed to Cd stress showed an imbalance in the homeostasis of essential elements. However, DOP mitigated the adverse effects of Cd and promoted increased contents of macronutrients (K, Ca, and Mg) and micronutrients (Mn, Fe, and Zn) found in tissues. This improvement in nutrient uptake may be associated with the observed increases in RDM. The roots absorb essential nutrients, making this tissue the first organ to perceive environmental restrictions. Additionally, successful nutrient acquisition is determined by the architecture of the root system and root growth rate [48,49]. Cd2+, as a homolog of metallic elements, can affect the absorption of essential nutrients, especially divalent cations such as Ca2+, Mg2+, Mn2+, Fe2+, and Zn2+, due to their similar chemical properties, interfering with element transport pathways and membrane permeability [50,51]. Cd2+ uptake occurs through transporters of essential mono and divalent metals, competing with cations such as K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Mn2+, Fe2+, and Zn2+, as well as through ion transport channels, thereby reducing the uptake of essential elements by the roots [8,50,52]. Three ordinary transporter families have been described to be involved in Cd uptake: NRAMP (natural resistance-associated macrophage protein), ZIP (zinc/iron-regulated transporter-like protein), and YSL proteins (yellow stripe-like 1) [53]. Malus hupehensis seedlings treated with DOP and subjected to stress due to nutrient deficiency, observed that DOP supplementation alleviated the stress induced by the deficiency, improving the nutritional status of the plants evaluated [54]. Similarly to our results, application of 100 μM DOP can alleviate stress due to low N supply by regulating the absorption of essential nutrients [55].
Plants treated with DOP and exposed to Cd showed increases in enzymatic activity. The increases observed in the activities of SOD, CAT, APX, and POX suggest benefits associated with prior treatment with neurotransmitters. DOP can directly mitigate the damage caused by ROS, as it is a water-soluble antioxidant that acts during the synthesis of melanin, a product linked to DOP oxidation, and is an effective scavenger of free radicals or through antioxidant enzymes [29,56]. Upregulation in the expression of antioxidant genes such as ascorbate peroxidase (cAPX), monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR), dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR), and glutathione reductase (cGR) may also contribute to the antioxidant capacity of the neurotransmitter [42]. The exogenous application of DOP promoted an increase in the activities of POX, CAT, and SOD, compared to watermelon seedlings exposed to cold stress [57]. Similarly, in response to bisphenol A stress, dopamine enhanced the activities of antioxidant enzymes in cucumber plants [33].
Plants exposed to excess Cd promoted the overaccumulation of ROS. However, applying DOP attenuated the adverse effects of stress indicators (O2−, H2O2, MDA, and EL). DOP and melanin, the products of their oxidation, play a direct role in ROS elimination, thereby preserving high antioxidant capacity [30,58]. Antioxidant enzymes convert ROS into non-toxic molecules, preventing cell disintegration by ROS [59]. For example, SOD is involved in the conversion of O2− into H2O2, while CAT degrades H2O2 into water and oxygen molecules. Furthermore, POX and APX decompose lipid peroxides and detoxify H2O2 through the ascorbate-glutathione cycle [60,61]. Exogenous treatment using 100 μM DOP in lettuce plants subjected to nitrogen deficiency mitigated oxidative stress, stimulating the antioxidant defense system [62]. DOP supplementation inhibited ROS accumulation, stimulated antioxidant enzymes, and protected plant cells from lipid peroxidation in soybean plants under salinity conditions [27]. These results corroborate our observations, demonstrating that the increase in antioxidant enzyme activities induced by DOP attenuates the oxidative stress caused by Cd.
Photosynthetic pigments were stimulated by spraying plants with DOP under Cd stress, as these increases were related to the improvement in nutritional status and significant increases in the contents of Mg and Fe. DOP increased the Mg and Fe contents and reduced the deleterious effects on pigments induced by Cd excess, improving the availability of these elements for the synthesis of Chl a, Chl b, Total Chl, and Car. Cd stress negatively interferes with physiological processes; the main sites of action of this metal are the photosynthetic system, its pigments, and carotenoid [63], having an effective role in increasing the activity of the chlorophyll degradation enzyme (chlorophyllase) or in suppressing the expression levels of key genes for chlorophyll synthesis [64]. Furthermore, Fe helps to improve chlorophyll contents and the synthesis of other pigments that are directly involved in collecting light for photosynthesis; its deficiency interferes with chloroplast component proteins, such as the cytochrome b6f complex (Cyt b6f) and ferredoxin (Fd), inhibiting electron transport and the efficiency of photosystem II [65,66]. Mg is the central element of the chlorophyll molecule and the activation of the enzyme ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase (RuBisCo), being a fundamental nutrient for the photosynthesis process [67,68]. Corroborating with our results, the application of 100 μM DOP increased the Chl a, Chl b, and Total Chl contents by 43%, 65%, and 50%, respectively, in tomato seedlings under saline stress [69]. DOP treatment mitigated cold stress in banana plants by enhancing chlorophyll accumulation, which was associated with the downregulation of chlorophyll degradation–related genes (MDC, PPH, PaO, and RCCR), suggesting that DOP prevents chlorophyll breakdown [32].
The application of DOP attenuated the toxic effects caused by excess Cd on chlorophyll fluorescence. The reduction in the F0 value and the increase in Fv, Fm, and Fv/Fm indicate improvements induced by the neurotransmitter in the PSII reaction center, enhancing its ability to collect and convert light energy. Cd stress impairs the absorption and conversion capacity of pigment molecules within PSII reaction centers [70]. On the other hand, DOP enhances the activity and stability of photosystems, particularly PSII, and also increases the concentration of antenna proteins [71]. Our results demonstrate that the changes found in Fv originate from Fm. In other words, Cd stress inhibited Fm. Fm is a key parameter in chlorophyll fluorescence in plants, being the highest level of fluorescence emitted by chlorophyll in a leaf after a plant is subjected to a dark-adapted state. The difference between Fm and F0 yields the Fv, which is then used in the ratio Fv/Fm, a standard indicator of the plant’s photosynthetic efficiency.
Decreases in Fv/Fm were observed in common bean plants exposed to Cd [72]. Cd contamination in sunflower plants promoted reductions in Fm and Fv/Fm, while there was an increase in F0 [73]. In other hand, Malus hupehensis leaves treated with 100 μM DOP showed an increase in Fv/Fm [74].
Cd2+ excess caused reductions in ΦPSII, qp, and ETR. On the other hand, 100 μM DOP mitigated the harmful interference caused by Cd. Cd affects metabolic and physiological processes, such as photosynthesis and photochemical reactions, with PSII being particularly sensitive. In PSII, Cd interferes with the oxygen evolution cycle at the donor site, inhibiting the transfer of electrons from Quinone A to Quinone B at the electron acceptor site [75]. Furthermore, DOP caused a decrease in NPQ, EXC, and ETR/PN values, confirming that exogenous DOP promotes improvements in the capture and utilization of light energy, as well as reducing the heat dissipation of light energy [36].
The reduction in qp and ETR values, together with the increase in NPQ and the decline in PN, indicates that Cd toxicity may delay plant growth by promoting the formation of ROS, which damage the photosynthetic apparatus and impair the efficiency of electron transfer in the light reaction center [76]. Application of 100 μM DOP increased Fv/Fm, ΦPSII, and qP, while reducing NPQ in cucumber leaves under mildew stress, indicating that exogenous DOP enhances the efficiency of light energy absorption and conversion [77]. Additionally, the role of the TyDC gene in DOP biosynthesis in apple plants and its contribution to drought stress response resulted in increases in Fv/Fm, ΦPSII, and qp, as well as a reduction in NPQ in transgenic lines (overexpressing MdTyDC) after 40 days of stress. These effects were associated with the higher DOP accumulation derived from MdTyDC overexpression [78].
Pre-treatment with 100 μM DOP in plants stressed by Cd promoted increases in PN, gs, WUE, and PN/Ci, and reducing in E and Ci. Cd toxicity damages the structures of chloroplasts and thylakoids, causing disturbances in the PSII reaction center, destruction of the oxygen-evolving complex (OEC), and blockage of electron transfer from QA to QB. These effects inhibit energy transfer and photochemical activity, resulting in a reduction in the photosynthetic rate [52,79,80]. Increases in PN, gs, WUE, and PN/Ci induced by DOP spray are related to the increases obtained in ΦPSII, qp, and ETR, indicating that this molecule provides benefits in the photosynthetic apparatus, effectively improving photochemical efficiency, RuBisCo activity, and promoting carbon assimilation [71,81]. The reduction in Ci and increase in gs suggest better stomatal performance, maximizing CO2 assimilation [82]. The transpiration process is intrinsically linked to water absorption and stomatal opening of plants [83], as detected in this study by the increase in WUE and reduction in E. Cowpea plants exposed to Cd exhibited reductions in PN, gs, E, WUE, and PN/Ci, accompanied by an increase in Ci [84]. Pre-treatment with different concentrations of DOP (0, 50, 100, 150, and 200 μM) in cucumber plants exposed to nitrate-induced stress (50 or 500 μM) markedly increased PN, gs, E, and Ci following DOP application [36].
Cd stress reduced biomass. However, DOP mitigated the deleterious effects induced by the metal on leaves, stems, and roots. The harmful impact of biomass reduction provoked by Cd is intrinsically related to essential nutrient uptake, chlorophyll synthesis, photosynthesis, gas exchange, membrane permeability, and ROS overproduction [85,86,87]. On the other hand, the values of LDM, SDM, RDM, and TDM revealed relevant increases when plants were pre-treated with DOP, being related to the roles played by this neurotransmitter in nutritional status, antioxidant system, and ROS elimination, photosynthetic pigments, chlorophyll fluorescence, and gas exchange described in this research. Cowpea plants treated with 500 μM Cd2+ showed reductions in LDM, RDM, SDM, and TDM [88]. Corroborating this research, Brassica oleracea seedlings treated with DOP (0, 50, 100, and 200 µM) and exposed to hydrocarbon-induced stress exhibited increases in both shoot and root biomass [89].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Geographical Location and Growth Parameters

The experiment was conducted in the Paragominas Campus of the Federal Rural University of Amazonia, Paragominas, Brazil (2°55′ S, 47°34′ W). The research was performed in a greenhouse with regulated temperature and humidity. The minimum, maximum, and median temperatures were 25.2 °C, 31.4 °C, and 26.7 °C, respectively. The relative humidity throughout the trial period fluctuated between 60% and 80%.

4.2. Plants, Containers, and Acclimation

Seeds of Glycine max (L.) Merr. var. M8644IPRO Monsoy™ were germinated and grown in 1.2-L pots [90]. For plant nutrition, a nutrient solution with an initial ionic strength of 50% was used (4th day) and later adjusted to 100% after 2 days (6th day) [91]. After this period, the nutritive solution remained at total ionic strength.

4.3. Experimental Design, Plant Nutrition and Cd Excess

The experiment was randomized with four treatments: two with cadmium concentrations (0 and 500 µM Cd, described as—Cd and +Cd, respectively) and two concentrations of dopamine (0 and 100 µM DOP described as—DOP and +DOP, respectively). Five replicates for each of the four treatments were conducted, yielding 20 experimental units in the experiment, with one plant in each experimental unit. DOP concentrations were chosen based on previous research [37]. Cd treatments were defined in preliminary tests and results available in literature [88].
Plants received the following macro- and micronutrients supplied in the nutrient solution as described previously [91]. To simulate Cd2+ exposure, cadmium chloride (CdCl2) was used at concentrations of 0 and 500 μM Cd and applied over 10 days (day 20–30 after the start of the experiment), with a 5-day interval between applications. During the study, the nutrient solutions were changed at 07:00 h at 3-day intervals, with the pH adjusted to 6.5 using HCl or NaOH. On day 30 of the experiment, all plants’ physiological and morphological parameters were measured, and the leaf tissues were collected for nutritional and biochemical analyses.

4.4. Dopamine (DOP) Preparation and Application

12-day-old plants were sprayed with dopamine (DOP) or Milli-Q water (containing a proportion of ethanol equally used to prepare the DOP solution), spraying 10 mL per plant at 5-day intervals until day 30. The DOP solution (100 µM; Sigma–Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) was prepared as described previously [29].

4.5. Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Gaseous Exchange

Chlorophyll fluorescence was assessed using a modulated chlorophyll fluorometer (model OS5p; Opti-Sciences, Hudson, NH, USA), being measured in fully expanded leaves under light. Preliminary tests determined that the acropetal third of leaves in the middle third of the plant and that adapted to the dark for 30 min yielded the greatest Fv/Fm ratio. Therefore, this part of the plant was used for measurements. The intensity and duration of the saturation light pulse were 7500 µmol m−2 s−1 and 0.7 s, respectively [92]. Gas exchange was measured using an infrared gas analyzer (LCPro+; ADC BioScientific, Hoddesdon, UK), being evaluated in all plants under a constant CO2 concentration (360 μmol mol−1 CO2), photosynthetically active radiation (800 μmol photons m−2 s−1), air-flow rate (300 µmol s−1), and temperature (28 °C) in the test chamber between 10:00 and 12:00 h [91].

4.6. Assessment of Antioxidant Enzymes, Soluble Proteins, and Stress Markers

Antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, APX, and POX) and soluble proteins were isolated from leaf tissues. The extraction mixture was prepared by homogenizing 500 mg of fresh plant material in 5 mL of extraction buffer, which consisted of 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.6), 1.0 mM ascorbate, and 1.0 mM EDTA. Samples were centrifuged at 14,000× g for 4 min at 3 °C, and the supernatant was collected [93]. Quantification of total soluble proteins was conducted [94]. SOD assay was performed at 560 nm [95], and SOD activity was quantified as units per mg of protein. CAT assay was measured at 240 nm [96], with CAT activity quantified as μmol H2O2 mg−1 protein min−1. The APX experiment was conducted at 290 nm [97], with APX activity quantified as μmol AsA mg−1 protein min−1. The POX assay was measured at 470 nm [98], with activity quantified as μmol tetraguaiacol mg−1 protein min−1. The O2 concentration was quantified at 530 nm [99]. Stress markers were isolated, specifically H2O2 and MDA [100]. The H2O2 concentration was quantified [101]. The MDA concentration was calculated utilizing an attenuation value of 155 mM−1 cm−1 [102]. EL was assessed using the methodology outlined in [103] and calculated as EL (%) = (EC1/EC2) × 100.

4.7. Assessment of Photosynthetic Pigments, Nutritional Composition, and Biomass

Chlorophyll and carotenoid concentrations were assessed using 40 mg of foliar tissue. The samples were homogenized in darkness using 8 mL of 90% methanol (Sigma-Aldrich™). The homogenate underwent centrifugation at 6000× g for 10 min at 5 °C. The supernatant was discarded, and the concentrations of Chl a, Chl b, Car, and total Chl were measured using a spectrophotometer (model UV-M51; Bel Photonics, Monza, Italy) following the protocol established in [104]. Samples (100 mg) of root, stem, and leaf tissues were pre-digested in 50 mL conical tubes using 2 mL of sub-boiled HNO3. Subsequently, 8 mL of a solution comprising 4 mL of H2O2 (30% v/v) and 4 mL of ultra-pure water was added and transferred to a Teflon digestion tube [105]. Cd, K, Ca, Mg, Mn, Fe, and Zn were quantified using an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (model ICP-MS 7900; Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The biomass of root, stem and leaves were quantified by constant dry weights (g) following desiccation in a forced-air oven at 65 °C.

4.8. Data Analysis

The normality of the residuals was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. The data underwent one-way ANOVA, and significant mean differences were assessed using the Scott–Knott test at a 5% probability level [106]. All statistical analyses employed R™ software version 4.3.3 [107].

5. Conclusions

Dopamine (DOP) mitigated the deleterious effects caused by Cd toxicity, regulating the antioxidant mechanism and protecting the photosynthetic apparatus of soybean plants. Exogenous DOP reduced oxidative damage by enhancing the activities of antioxidant enzymes, including superoxide dismutase, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, and peroxidase, which detoxify reactive compounds such as hydrogen peroxide, superoxide, malondialdehyde, and electrolytes. Consequently, DOP alleviated negative effects on the photosynthetic apparatus, improving chlorophyll content, photosynthetic activity, PSII efficiency, and gas exchange in plants under Cd stress. In addition to the diverse roles of DOP in the antioxidant system, gas exchange, and photochemical efficiency of photosystem II, the neurotransmitter also improved the nutritional status of plants, contributing to the increase in biomass accumulation. Therefore, our results indicate that exogenous DOP increased tolerance to Cd-induced stress in soybean plants, but future studies with other soybean varieties and varying DOP concentrations, combined with transcriptomic or proteomic validation, are necessary.

Author Contributions

A.K.d.S.L. was the advisor for this project, planning all phases of the research and critically revising the manuscript. A.S.C. and C.V.d.S.P. conducted the experiment, performed physiological, biochemical, and morphological determinations, and wrote and edited the manuscript. C.C.A. and B.L.B. performed nutritional analysis. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research had financial support from Fundação Amazônia de Amparo a Estudos e Pesquisas (FAPESPA/Brazil), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq/Brazil) and Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia (UFRA/Brazil) to A.K.d.S.L. On the other hand, A.S.C. was supported with a scholarship from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES/Brazil).

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Arias, A.C.R.; Chaparro-Giraldo, A.; López-Pazos, S.A. A Basic Scheme of Soybean Transformation for Glyphosate Tolerance Using Agrobacterium Tumefaciens through an Approximation of Patents: A Review. Agron. Colomb. 2021, 39, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tariq, A.; Jabeen, Z.; Farrakh, S.; Noreen, K.; Arshad, W.; Ahmed, H.; Haider, W. Exploring the Genetic Potential of Pakistani Soybean Cultivars through RNA-Seq Based Transcriptome Analysis. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2022, 49, 2889–2897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fao FAO Statistical Databases. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#rankings/countries_by_commodity (accessed on 15 May 2025).
  4. Conab Monitoring the Brazilian Harvest 2023/2024. 2024. Available online: https://www.gov.br/conab/pt-br/atuacao/informacoes-agropecuarias/safras/safra-de-graos/boletim-da-safra-de-graos/12o-levantamento-safra-2023-2024/12o-levantamento-safra-2023-2024 (accessed on 5 January 2025).
  5. Teixeira, W.F.; Soares, L.H.; Fagan, E.B.; da Costa Mello, S.; Reichardt, K.; Dourado-Neto, D. Amino Acids as Stress Reducers in Soybean Plant Growth under Different Water-Deficit Conditions. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 39, 905–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, X.; Fan, X.; Chang, W.; Li, K.; Zhang, M.; Pu, G.; Kurakov, A.V.; Ping, Y.; Song, F. Enhancing Soil Quality in Soybean Cultivation: Mycorrhizal Technology Combined with Intercropping under High Cadmium Stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2025, 290, 117558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Khan, K.; Khan, R.; Liu, Z.; Ali, S.; Naseer, M.A.; Shah, M.A.; Ahmad, H.; Zhou, X.B. Melatonin Mitigates Nickel Oxide Nanoparticles Induced Phytotoxicity in Soybean by Reducing Metal Accumulation, Enhancing Antioxidant Defense and Promoting Nitrogen Assimilation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2025, 485, 136861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Li, Y.; Rahman, S.U.; Qiu, Z.; Shahzad, S.M.; Nawaz, M.F.; Huang, J.; Naveed, S.; Li, L.; Wang, X.; Cheng, H. Toxic Effects of Cadmium on the Physiological and Biochemical Attributes of Plants, and Phytoremediation Strategies: A Review. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 325, 121433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Abou Fayssal, S.; Kumar, P.; Popescu, S.M.; ud din Khanday, M.; Sardar, H.; Ahmad, R.; Gupta, D.; Kumar Gaur, S.; Alharby, H.F.; Al-Ghamdi, A.G. Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Saffron (Crocus Sativus L.) Cultivated in Domestic Wastewater and Lake Water Irrigated Soils. Heliyon 2024, 10, e27138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. El Rasafi, T.; Oukarroum, A.; Haddioui, A.; Song, H.; Kwon, E.E.; Bolan, N.; Tack, F.M.G.; Sebastian, A.; Prasad, M.N.V.; Rinklebe, J. Cadmium Stress in Plants: A Critical Review of the Effects, Mechanisms, and Tolerance Strategies. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 52, 675–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, X.; Yang, M.; Yang, H.; Pian, R.; Wang, J.; Wu, A.M. The Uptake, Transfer, and Detoxification of Cadmium in Plants and Its Exogenous Effects. Cells 2024, 13, 907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sabella, E.; Aprile, A.; Tenuzzo, B.A.; Carata, E.; Panzarini, E.; Luvisi, A.; De Bellis, L.; Vergine, M. Effects of Cadmium on Root Morpho-Physiology of Durum Wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 936020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Abedi, T.; Mojiri, A. Cadmium Uptake by Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): An Overview. Plants 2020, 9, 500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zulfiqar, U.; Ayub, A.; Hussain, S.; Waraich, E.A.; El-Esawi, M.A.; Ishfaq, M.; Ahmad, M.; Ali, N.; Maqsood, M.F. Cadmium Toxicity in Plants: Recent Progress on Morpho-Physiological Effects and Remediation Strategies; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; Volume 22, ISBN 4272902100645. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ashraf, H.; Ghouri, F.; Ali, S.; Bukhari, S.A.H.; Haider, F.U.; Zhong, M.; Xia, W.; Fu, X.; Shahid, M.Q. The Protective Roles of Oryza Glumaepatula and Phytohormone in Enhancing Rice Tolerance to Cadmium Stress by Regulating Gene Expression, Morphological, Physiological, and Antioxidant Defense System. Environ. Pollut. 2025, 364, 125311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ur Rahman, S.; Xuebin, Q.; Kamran, M.; Yasin, G.; Cheng, H.; Rehim, A.; Riaz, L.; Rizwan, M.; Ali, S.; Alsahli, A.A.; et al. Silicon Elevated Cadmium Tolerance in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by Endorsing Nutrients Uptake and Antioxidative Defense Mechanisms in the Leaves. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 166, 148–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ur Rahman, S.; Xuebin, Q.; Yasin, G.; Cheng, H.; Mehmood, F.; Zain, M.; Shehzad, M.; Ahmad, M.I.; Riaz, L.; Rahim, A.; et al. Role of Silicon on Root Morphological Characters of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Plants Grown under Cd-Contaminated Nutrient Solution. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2021, 43, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Muhammad, S.; Ulhassan, Z.; Munir, R.; Yasin, M.U.; Islam, F.; Zhang, K.; Chen, W.; Jan, M.; Afzal, M.; Muhammad, A.; et al. Nanosilica and Salicylic Acid Synergistically Regulate Cadmium Toxicity in Rice. Environ. Pollut. 2025, 364, 125331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shahzad, A.; Hameed, S.; Qin, M.; Li, H.; Zafar, S.; Siddiqui, S.; Sattar, S.; Mahmood, Z.; Mehwish, S. Cadmium (Cd) Detoxification and Activation of Plant Defense Enzymes in Wheat (Triticum aestivum) through the Use of Endophytic Bacillus Thuringiensis and Salix Alba Root Powder. Environ. Pollut. 2025, 364, 125147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, S.; Wufuer, R.; Duo, J.; Li, W.; Pan, X. Cadmium Caused Different Toxicity to Photosystem I and Photosystem II of Freshwater Unicellular Algae Chlorella Pyrenoidosa (Chlorophyta). Toxics 2022, 10, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Song, J.; Sun, Z.; Saud, S.; Fahad, S.; Nawaz, T. Exploring the Deleterious Effects of Heavy Metal Cadmium on Antioxidant Defense and Photosynthetic Pathways in Higher Plants. Plant Stress 2025, 15, 100716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Haider, F.U.; Zulfiqar, U.; Noor-ul-Ain; Mehmood, T.; Shahzad, B.; Liqun, C.; Yong, J.W.H.; Binobead, M.A. Effects of Titanium Oxide Nanoparticles and 24-Epibrassinosteroid to Mitigate the Toxicity of Cadmium (Cd) and Improve Physio-Morphological Traits of Soybean (Glycine max L.) Cultivated under Cd-Contaminated Soil. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2024, 36, 103811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, X.; Yuan, X.; Wu, Q.; Chen, S.; Zou, Y.; Ma, F.; Li, C. Exogenous Dopamine Improves Apple Fruit Quality via Increasing Flavonoids and Soluble Sugar Contents. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 280, 109903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Akula, R.; Mukherjee, S. New Insights on Neurotransmitters Signaling Mechanisms in Plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2020, 15, 1737450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, X.; Li, J.; Cao, H.; Tian, X.; Li, S.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Z.; Mao, K.; Ma, F.; Li, C. Dopamine Regulates Its Own Synthesis via MdORG2 to Improve Low-Nitrogen Tolerance in Apple Plants. Plant. Cell Environ. 2025, 48, 470–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Akcay, U.C.; Gencay, R.; Koc, F.Z. Effect of Dopamine and Progesterone on the Physiological and Molecular Responses of Tomato Seedlings to Drought and Salt Stress. Cogent Food Agric. 2024, 10, 2321308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Abo-Shanab, W.A.; Diab, R.H. Dopamine Hydrochloride Alleviates the Salt-Induced Stress in Glycine max (L.) Merr. Plant. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2024, 24, 3474–3490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Du, P.; Yin, B.; Zhou, S.; Li, Z.; Zhang, X.; Cao, Y.; Han, R.; Shi, C.; Liang, B.; Xu, J. Melatonin and Dopamine Mediate the Regulation of Nitrogen Uptake and Metabolism at Low Ammonium Levels in Malus Hupehensis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 171, 182–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jiao, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Liu, C.; Liang, W.; Li, C.; Ma, F.; Li, C. Exogenous Dopamine Application Promotes Alkali Tolerance of Apple Seedlings. Plants 2019, 8, 580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Abdulmajeed, A.M.; Alharbi, B.M.; Alharby, H.F.; Abualresh, A.M.; Badawy, G.A.; Semida, W.M.; Rady, M. Simultaneous Action of Silymarin and Dopamine Enhances Defense Mechanisms Related to Antioxidants, Polyamine Metabolic Enzymes, and Tolerance to Cadmium Stress in Phaseolus Vulgaris. Plants 2022, 11, 3069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cao, Y.; Du, P.; Yin, B.; Zhou, S.; Li, Z.; Zhang, X.; Xu, J.; Liang, B. Melatonin and Dopamine Enhance Waterlogging Tolerance by Modulating ROS Scavenging, Nitrogen Uptake, and the Rhizosphere Microbial Community in Malus Hupehensis. Plant Soil 2023, 483, 475–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ali, A.F.; Hatamnia, A.A.; Malekzadeh, P.; Sayyari, M.; Aghdam, M.S. Exogenous Dopamine Ameliorates Chilling Injury in Banana Fruits by Enhancing Endogenous Dopamine and Glycine Betaine Accumulation and Promoting ROS Scavenging System Activity. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2023, 205, 112521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ahammed, G.J.; Wang, Y.; Mao, Q.; Wu, M.; Yan, Y.; Ren, J.; Wang, X.; Liu, A.; Chen, S. Dopamine Alleviates Bisphenol A-Induced Phytotoxicity by Enhancing Antioxidant and Detoxification Potential in Cucumber. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 259, 113957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, X.; Yuan, X.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Ma, F.; Li, C. Dopamine Enhances the Resistance of Apple to Valsa Mali Infection. Phytopathology 2022, 112, 1141–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liang, B.; Gao, T.; Zhao, Q.; Ma, C.; Chen, Q.; Wei, Z.; Li, C.; Li, C.; Ma, F. Effects of Exogenous Dopamine on the Uptake, Transport, and Resorption of Apple Ionome under Moderate Drought. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lan, G.; Jiao, C.; Wang, G.; Sun, Y.; Sun, Y. Effects of Dopamine on Growth, Carbon Metabolism, and Nitrogen Metabolism in Cucumber under Nitrate Stress. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 260, 108790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pontes, C.V.S.; Prestes, L.R.; Vieira Neto, A.F.; Lopes, L.K.C.; Barbosa, M.A.M.; Lobato, A.K.d.S. Single and Combined Applications of Dopamine and 24-Epibrassinolide in Soybean Seedlings under Water Deficiency: Tolerance Mechanisms Essential to Inhibit Deleterious Effects. Plant Biosyst. 2024, 158, 1347–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ji, Z.Y.; Liu, Z.Y.; Shi, L.M.; Lu, X.Y.; Han, Y.Y.; Sun, Y. Mitigation Effect of Exogenous Dopamine Treatment on Downy Mildew-Infected Cucumber. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2024, 43, 2615–2631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sehrish, A.K.; Ahmad, S.; Ali, S.; Tabssam, R.; Ai, F.; Du, W.; Guo, H. Alleviation of Cadmium Toxicity by Improving Antioxidant Defense Mechanism and Nutrient Uptake in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) through Foliar Application of 24-Epibrassinolide under Elevated CO2. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 480, 136209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, Y.; Liu, Q.; Li, X.; Tang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, H.; Ma, F.; Li, C. Exogenous Dopamine and MdTyDC Overexpression Enhance Apple Resistance to Fusarium Solani. Phytopathology 2022, 112, 2503–2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Zhao, Y.; Li, Q.; Chen, D.; Yang, M.; Huang, F.; Liu, J.; Yu, X.; Yu, L. Exploiting Synergy of Dopamine and Stressful Conditions in Enhancing Haematococcus Lacustris Biomass and Astaxanthin Yield. Bioresour. Technol. 2025, 417, 131848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Liu, Q.; Gao, T.; Liu, W.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, W.; Ding, K.; Ma, F.; Li, C. Functions of Dopamine in Plants: A Review. Plant Signal. Behav. 2020, 15, 1827782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhang, Z.; Tang, Z.; Jing, G.; Gao, S.; Liu, C.; Ai, S.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Q.; Li, C.; Ma, F. Dopamine Confers Cadmium Tolerance in Apples by Improving Growth, Reducing Reactive Oxygen Species, and Changing Secondary Metabolite Levels. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2023, 208, 105264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cao, Y.; Du, P.; Zhang, J.; Ji, J.; Xu, J.; Liang, B. Dopamine Alleviates Cadmium Stress in Apple Trees by Recruiting Beneficial Microorganisms to Enhance the Physiological Resilience Revealed by High-Throughput Sequencing and Soil Metabolomics. Hortic. Res. 2023, 10, uhad112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. He, J.; Zhou, J.; Wan, H.; Zhuang, X.; Li, H.; Qin, S.; Lyu, D. Rootstock–Scion Interaction Affects Cadmium Accumulation and Tolerance of Malus. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yi, Y.; Liu, H.; Chen, G.; Wu, X.; Zeng, F. Cadmium Accumulation in Plants: Insights from Phylogenetic Variation into the Evolution and Functions of Membrane Transporters. Sustain. 2023, 15, 12158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cunha, L.F.S.d.; Oliveira, V.P.d.; Nascimento, A.W.S.d.; Silva, B.R.S.d.; Batista, B.L.; Alsahli, A.A.; Lobato, A.K.d.S. Leaf Application of 24-epibrassinolide Mitigates Cadmium Toxicity in Young Eucalyptus Urophylla Plants by Modulating Leaf Anatomy and Gas Exchange. Physiol. Plant. 2020, 173, 67–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Schäfer, E.D.; Owen, M.R.; Band, L.R.; Farcot, E.; Bennett, M.J.; Lynch, J.P. Modeling Root Loss Reveals Impacts on Nutrient Uptake and Crop Development. Plant Physiol. 2022, 190, 2260–2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Cochavi, A.; Cohen, I.H.; Rachmilevitch, S. The Role of Different Root Orders in Nutrient Uptake. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 179, 104212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Liu, J.; Ni, J.; Mo, A.; Fan, X.; Jiang, Y.; Xie, H.; Hu, J.; Zhu, Y.; Peng, C.; Yang, F. Cadmium Affects the Growth, Antioxidant Capacity, Chlorophyll Content, and Homeostasis of Essential Elements in Soybean Plants. South African J. Bot. 2023, 162, 604–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Haider, F.U.; Liqun, C.; Coulter, J.A.; Cheema, S.A.; Wu, J.; Zhang, R.; Wenjun, M.; Farooq, M. Cadmium Toxicity in Plants: Impacts and Remediation Strategies. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 211, 111887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Fan, P.; Wu, L.; Wang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Luo, H.; Song, J.; Yang, M.; Yao, H.; Chen, S. Physiological and Molecular Mechanisms of Medicinal Plants in Response to Cadmium Stress: Current Status and Future Perspective. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 450, 131008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Huang, X.; Duan, S.; Wu, Q.; Yu, M.; Shabala, S. Reducing Cadmium Accumulation in Plants: Structure—Function Relations and Tissue-Specifica’c. Plants Rev. 2020, 9, 18. [Google Scholar]
  54. Liang, B.; Li, C.; Ma, C.; Wei, Z.; Wang, Q.; Huang, D.; Chen, Q.; Li, C.; Ma, F. Dopamine Alleviates Nutrient Deficiency-Induced Stress in Malus Hupehensis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 119, 346–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Liu, X.-m.; Gao, T.-t.; Zhang, Z.; Tan, K.-x.; Jin, Y.-b.; Zhao, Y.-j.; Ma, F.-w.; Li, C. The Mitigation Effects of Exogenous Dopamine on Low Nitrogen Stress in Malus Hupehensis. J. Integr. Agric. 2020, 19, 2709–2724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gao, T.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, X.; Wu, Q.; Chen, Q.; Liu, Q.; van Nocker, S.; Ma, F.; Li, C. Physiological and Transcriptome Analyses of the Effects of Exogenous Dopamine on Drought Tolerance in Apple. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 148, 260–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jiao, C.; Lan, G.; Sun, Y.; Wang, G.; Sun, Y. Dopamine Alleviates Chilling Stress in Watermelon Seedlings via Modulation of Proline Content, Antioxidant Enzyme Activity, and Polyamine Metabolism. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 40, 277–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hedges, D.M.; Yorgason, J.T.; Perez, A.W.; Schilaty, N.D.; Williams, B.M.; Watt, R.K.; Steffensen, S.C. Spontaneous Formation of Melanin from Dopamine in the Presence of Iron. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chen, Z.; Feng, Y.; Guo, Z.; Han, M.; Yan, X. Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Alleviate Cadmium Toxicity and Promote Tolerance by Modulating Programmed Cell Death in Alfalfa (Medicago Sativa L.). J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 469, 133917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chen, J.; Qin, H.; Zhang, B.; Mao, W.; Lou, L.; Shen, C.; Mao, J.; Lin, Q. Development of Melatonin Nano-Delivery Systems to Reduce Cadmium Accumulation in Rice (Oryza Sativa L.) Seedlings: Insights from Photosynthetic Efficiency, Antioxidative Response and Gene Expression. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2022, 196, 104822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Laxa, M.; Liebthal, M.; Telman, W.; Chibani, K.; Dietz, K.J. The Role of the Plant Antioxidant System in Drought Tolerance. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Farouk, S.; El-Hady, M.A.A.; El-Sherpiny, M.A.; Hassan, M.M.; Alamer, K.H.; Al-Robai, S.A.; Ali, E.F.; El-Bauome, H.A. Effect of Dopamine on Growth, Some Biochemical Attributes, and the Yield of Crisphead Lettuce under Nitrogen Deficiency. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Saeed, W.; Mubeen, S.; Pan, J.; Rehman, M.; Fang, W.; Luo, D.; Liu, P.; Li, Y.; Chen, P. Integrated Physiological and Metabolomic Responses Reveal Mechanisms of Cd Tolerance and Detoxification in Kenaf (Hibiscus Cannabinus L.) under Cd Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1332426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Zhang, B.; Li, Z.; Feng, Y.; Qaharaduqin, S.; Liu, W.; Yan, Y. Impact of Cd and Pb on the Photosynthetic and Antioxidant Systems of Hemerocallis Citrina Baroni as Revealed by Physiological and Transcriptomic Analyses. Plant Cell Rep. 2024, 43, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Roncel, M.; González-Rodríguez, A.A.; Naranjo, B.; Bernal-Bayard, P.; Lindahl, A.M.; Hervás, M.; Navarro, J.A.; Ortega, J.M. Iron Deficiency Induces a Partial Inhibition of the Photosynthetic Electron Transport and a High Sensitivity to Light in the Diatom Phaeodactylum Tricornutum. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Santos, L.R.; Paula, L.S.; Pereira, Y.C.; Silva, B.R.S.d.; Batista, B.L.; Alsahli, A.A.; Lobato, A.K.d.S. Brassinosteroids-Mediated Amelioration of Iron Deficiency in Soybean Plants: Beneficial Effects on the Nutritional Status, Photosynthetic Pigments and Chlorophyll Fluorescence. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 40, 1803–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Assunção, N.S.; Ribeiro, N.P.; da Silva, R.M.; Soratto, R.P.; Fernandes, A.M. Tuber Yield and Allocation of Nutrients and Carbohydrates in Potato Plants as Affected by Limestone Type and Magnesium Supply. J. Plant Nutr. 2020, 43, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Santos, L.A.; Batista, B.L.; Lobato, A.K.d.S. 24-Epibrasinolide Delays Chlorophyll Degradation and Stimulates the Photosynthetic Machinery in Magnesium-Stressed Soybean Plants. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 42, 183–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yildirim, E.; Ekinci, M.; Turan, M.; Yuce, M.; Ors, S.; Araz, O.; Torun, U.; Argin, S. Exogenous Dopamine Mitigates the Effects of Salinity Stress in Tomato Seedlings by Alleviating the Oxidative Stress and Regulating Phytohormones. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2024, 46, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wang, X.; Zhang, J.; Shen, J.; Zhang, L.; Wei, P.; Liu, A.; Song, H. The Alleviating Effect on the Growth, Chlorophyll Synthesis, and Biochemical Defense System in Sunflowers under Cadmium Stress Achieved through Foliar Application of Humic Acid. BMC Plant Biol. 2024, 24, 792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wang, W.; Yang, Y.; Ma, X.; He, Y.; Ren, Q.; Huang, Y.; Wang, J.; Xue, Y.; Yang, R.; Guo, Y.; et al. New Insight into the Function of Dopamine (DA) during Cd Stress in Duckweed (Lemna Turionifera 5511). Plants 2023, 12, 1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Semida, W.M.; Rady, M.M.; Abed El-Mageed, T.A.; Howladar, S.M.; Abdelhamid, M.T. Alleviation of Cadmium Toxicity in Common Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) Plants by the Exogenous Application of Salicylic Acid. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2015, 90, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Shahabivand, S.; Parvaneh, A.; Aliloo, A.A. Root Endophytic Fungus Piriformospora Indica Affected Growth, Cadmium Partitioning and Chlorophyll Fluorescence of Sunflower under Cadmium Toxicity. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 145, 496–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Zhang, Z.; Guo, J.; Yang, C.; Ma, Y.; Gao, S.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, J.; Ma, F.; Li, C. Exogenous Dopamine Delays the Senescence of Detached Malus Hupehensis Leaves by Reducing Phytohormone Signalling and Sugar Degradation. Sci. Hortic. 2023, 319, 112151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ekmekçi, Y.; Tanyolaç, D.; Ayhan, B. Effects of Cadmium on Antioxidant Enzyme and Photosynthetic Activities in Leaves of Two Maize Cultivars. J. Plant Physiol. 2008, 165, 600–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Su, L.; Xie, Y.; He, Z.; Zhou, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, R.; Li, C. Selenium Mitigates Cd-Induced Oxidative Stress and Photosynthesis Inhibition in Two Cherry Tomato Cultivars. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2022, 22, 3212–3227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ji, Z.; Liu, Z.; Han, Y.; Sun, Y. Exogenous Dopamine Promotes Photosynthesis and Carbohydrate Metabolism of Downy Mildew-Infected Cucumber. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 295, 110842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, Y.; Chen, Q.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, T.; Li, C.; Ma, F. Overexpression of the Tyrosine Decarboxylase Gene MdTyDC in Apple Enhances Long-Term Moderate Drought Tolerance and WUE. Plant Sci. 2021, 313, 111064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhou, R.; Xu, J.; Li, L.; Yin, Y.; Xue, B.; Li, J.; Sun, F. Exploration of the Effects of Cadmium Stress on Photosynthesis in Oenanthe Javanica (Blume) DC. Toxics 2024, 12, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Manzoor, H.; Mehwish; Bukhat, S.; Rasul, S.; Rehmani, M.I.A.; Noreen, S.; Athar, H.U.R.; Zafar, Z.U.; Skalicky, M.; Soufan, W.; et al. Methyl Jasmonate Alleviated the Adverse Effects of Cadmium Stress in Pea (Pisum Sativum L.): A Nexus of Photosystem II Activity and Dynamics of Redox Balance. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 860664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Arena, C.; Figlioli, F.; Sorrentino, M.C.; Izzo, L.G.; Capozzi, F.; Giordano, S.; Spagnuolo, V. Ultrastructural, Protein and Photosynthetic Alterations Induced by Pb and Cd in Cynara Cardunculus L., and Its Potential for Phytoremediation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 145, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Maia, C.F.; Pereira, Y.C.; Silva, B.R.S.d.; Batista, B.L.; Lobato, A.K.d.S. Exogenously Applied 24-Epibrassinolide Favours Stomatal Performance, ROS Detoxification and Nutritional Balance, Alleviating Oxidative Damage Against the Photosynthetic Apparatus in Tomato Leaves Under Nickel Stress. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 42, 2196–2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, D.; Hu, X.; Feng, P.; Mo, Y.; Li, H.; Gong, S. Integrated Effects of Soil Moisture on Wheat Hydraulic Properties and Stomatal Regulation. Plants 2024, 13, 2263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Pereira, T.S.; Pereira, T.S.; Souza, C.L.F.d.C.; Lima, E.J.A.; Batista, B.L.; Lobato, A.K.d.S. Silicon Deposition in Roots Minimizes the Cadmium Accumulation and Oxidative Stress in Leaves of Cowpea Plants. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2018, 24, 99–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Bashir, A.; Rizwan, M.; Zia ur Rehman, M.; Zubair, M.; Riaz, M.; Qayyum, M.F.; Alharby, H.F.; Bamagoos, A.A.; Ali, S. Application of Co-Composted Farm Manure and Biochar Increased the Wheat Growth and Decreased Cadmium Accumulation in Plants under Different Water Regimes. Chemosphere 2020, 246, 125809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Xu, X.; Yang, B.; Qin, G.; Wang, H.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, K.; Yang, H. Growth, Accumulation, and Antioxidative Responses of Two Salix Genotypes Exposed to Cadmium and Lead in Hydroponic Culture. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 19770–19784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zhu, Y.; Wang, H.; Lv, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, W. Effects of Biochar and Biofertilizer on Cadmium-Contaminated Cotton Growth and the Antioxidative Defense System. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 20112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Santos, L.R.; Batista, B.L.; Lobato, A.K.d.S. Brassinosteroids Mitigate Cadmium Toxicity in Cowpea Plants. Photosynthetica 2018, 56, 591–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ahmad, A.; Khan, W.U.; Shah, A.A.; Yasin, N.A.; Ali, A.; Rizwan, M.; Ali, S. Dopamine Alleviates Hydrocarbon Stress in Brassica Oleracea through Modulation of Physio-Biochemical Attributes and Antioxidant Defense Systems. Chemosphere 2021, 270, 128633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Lima, J.V.; Lobato, A.K.d.S. Brassinosteroids Improve Photosystem II Efficiency, Gas Exchange, Antioxidant Enzymes and Growth of Cowpea Plants Exposed to Water Deficit. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2017, 23, 59–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Pereira, Y.C.; Rodrigues, W.S.; Lima, E.J.A.; Santos, L.R.; Silva, M.H.L.; Lobato, A.K.d.S. Brassinosteroids Increase Electron Transport and Photosynthesis in Soybean Plants under Water Deficit. Photosynthetica 2019, 57, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Maia, C.F.; Silva, B.R.S.d.; Lobato, A.K.d.S. Brassinosteroids Positively Modulate Growth: Physiological, Biochemical and Anatomical Evidence Using Two Tomato Genotypes Contrasting to Dwarfism. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2018, 37, 1099–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Badawi, G.H.; Yamauchi, Y.; Shimada, E.; Sasaki, R.; Kawano, N.; Tanaka, K.; Tanaka, K. Enhanced Tolerance to Salt Stress and Water Deficit by Overexpressing Superoxide Dismutase in Tobacco (Nicotiana Tabacu) Chloroplasts. Plant Sci. 2004, 166, 919–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Bradford, M.M. A Rapid and Sensitive Method for the Quantitation of Microgram Quantities of Protein Utilizing the Principle of Protein-Dye Binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Giannopolitis, C.N.; Ries, S.K. Superoxide Dismutases: I. Occurrence in Higher Plants. Plant Physiol. 1977, 59, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Havir, E.A.; McHale, N.A. Biochemical and Developmental Characterization of Multiple Forms of Catalase in Tobacco Leaves. Plant Physiol. 1987, 84, 450–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Nakano, Y.; Asada, K. Hydrogen Peroxide Is Scavenged by Ascorbate-Specific Peroxidase in Spinach Chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol. 1981, 22, 867–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Cakmak, I.; Marschner, H. Magnesium Deficiency and High Light Intensity Enhance Activities of Superoxide Dismutase, Ascorbate Peroxidase, and Glutathione Reductase in Bean Leaves. Plant Physiol. 1992, 98, 1222–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Elstner, E.F.; Heupel, A. Inhibition of Nitrite Formation from Hydroxylammoniumchloride: A Simple Assay for Superoxide Dismutase. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 70, 616–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wu, Q.-S.; Xia, R.-X.; Zou, Y.-N. Reactive Oxygen Metabolism in Mycorrhizal and Non-Mycorrhizal Citrus (Poncirus Trifoliata) Seedlings Subjected to Water Stress. J. Plant Physiol. 2006, 163, 1101–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Velikova, V.; Yordanov, I.; Edreva, A. Oxidative Stress and Some Antioxidant Systems in Acid Rain-Treated Bean Plants Protective Role of Exogenous Polyamines. Plant Sci. 2000, 151, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Cakmak, I.; Horst, W.J. Effect of Aluminium on Lipid Peroxidation, Superoxide Dismutase, Catalase, and Peroxidase Activities in Root Tips of Soybean (Glycine max). Physiol. Plant. 1991, 83, 463–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Gong, M.; Li, Y.-J.; Chen, S.-Z. Abscisic Acid-Induced Thermotolerance in Maize Seedlings Is Mediated by Calcium and Associated with Antioxidant Systems. J. Plant Physiol. 1998, 153, 488–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Lichtenthaler, H.K.; Buschmann, C. Chlorophylls and Carotenoids: Measurement and Characterization by UV-VIS Spectroscopy. In Current Protocols in Food Analytical Chemistry; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2001; pp. 431–438. ISBN 9780471709084. [Google Scholar]
  105. Paniz, F.P.; Pedron, T.; Freire, B.M.; Torres, D.P.; Silva, F.F.; Batista, B.L. Effective Procedures for the Determination of As, Cd, Cu, Fe, Hg, Mg, Mn, Ni, Pb, Se, Th, Zn, U and Rare Earth Elements in Plants and Foodstuffs. Anal. Methods 2018, 10, 4094–4103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Steel, R.G.; Torrie, J.H.; Dickey, D.A. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach, 3rd ed.; Academic Internet Publishers: Moorpark, CA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  107. Venables, W.N.; Smith, D.M.; R Core Team. An Introduction to R. Pr. Graph. Min. R 2024, 2, 27–52. [Google Scholar]
Plants 14 03411 g001
Figure 1. (A–D) Minimal fluorescence yield of the dark-adapted state (F0), maximal fluorescence yield of the dark-adapted state (Fm), variable fluorescence (Fv) and maximal quantum yield of PSII photochemistry (Fv/Fm) in soybean plants sprayed with DOP and exposed to Cd excess. Columns with different letters indicate significant differences from the Scott-Knott test (p < 0.05). Values described correspond to means from five repetitions and standard deviations.
Figure 1. (A–D) Minimal fluorescence yield of the dark-adapted state (F0), maximal fluorescence yield of the dark-adapted state (Fm), variable fluorescence (Fv) and maximal quantum yield of PSII photochemistry (Fv/Fm) in soybean plants sprayed with DOP and exposed to Cd excess. Columns with different letters indicate significant differences from the Scott-Knott test (p < 0.05). Values described correspond to means from five repetitions and standard deviations.
Plants 14 03411 g001
Plants 14 03411 g002
Figure 2. (A–D) Activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and peroxidase (POX) in soybean plants sprayed with DOP and Cd excess. Columns with different letters indicate significant differences from the Scott-Knott test (p < 0.05). Columns corresponding to means from five repetitions and standard deviations.
Figure 2. (A–D) Activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and peroxidase (POX) in soybean plants sprayed with DOP and Cd excess. Columns with different letters indicate significant differences from the Scott-Knott test (p < 0.05). Columns corresponding to means from five repetitions and standard deviations.
Plants 14 03411 g002
Plants 14 03411 g003
Figure 3. (A–D) Superoxide (O2−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), malondialdehyde (MDA) and electrolyte leakage (EL) in soybean plants sprayed with DOP and Cd excess. Columns with different letters indicate significant differences from the Scott-Knott test (p < 0.05). Columns corresponding to means from five repetitions and standard deviations.
Figure 3. (A–D) Superoxide (O2−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), malondialdehyde (MDA) and electrolyte leakage (EL) in soybean plants sprayed with DOP and Cd excess. Columns with different letters indicate significant differences from the Scott-Knott test (p < 0.05). Columns corresponding to means from five repetitions and standard deviations.
Plants 14 03411 g003
Plants 14 03411 g004
Figure 4. Upper and side views of soybean plants sprayed with DOP and Cd excess.
Figure 4. Upper and side views of soybean plants sprayed with DOP and Cd excess.
Plants 14 03411 g004
Plants 14 03411 g005
Figure 5. (A–D) Leaf dry matter (LDM), root dry matter (RDM), stem dry matter (SDM) and total dry matter (TDM) in soybean plants sprayed with DOP and Cd excess. Columns with different letters indicate significant differences from the Scott-Knott test (p < 0.05). Columns corresponding to means from five repetitions and standard deviations.
Figure 5. (A–D) Leaf dry matter (LDM), root dry matter (RDM), stem dry matter (SDM) and total dry matter (TDM) in soybean plants sprayed with DOP and Cd excess. Columns with different letters indicate significant differences from the Scott-Knott test (p < 0.05). Columns corresponding to means from five repetitions and standard deviations.
Plants 14 03411 g005
Table 1. Cd contents in soybean plants sprayed with DOP and exposed to Cd excess.
Table 1. Cd contents in soybean plants sprayed with DOP and exposed to Cd excess.
Cd2+DOPCd in Root (µg g DM−1)Cd in Stem (µg g DM−1)Cd in Leaf (µg g DM−1)
−−0.77 ± 0.05 c0.09 ± 0.01 c0.07 ± 0.01 c
−+0.75 ± 0.01 c0.09 ± 0.01 c0.06 ± 0.01 c
+−971.24 ± 24.31 a5.05 ± 0.10 a12.94 ± 0.20 a
++387.26 ± 16.56 b3.60 ± 0.07 b8.01 ± 0.23 b
Cd2+ = cadmium; DOP = dopamine. Columns with different letters indicate significant differences from the Scott-Knott test (p < 0.05). Values described correspond to means from five repetitions and standard deviations.
Table 2. Nutrient contents in soybean plants sprayed with DOP and exposed to Cd excess.
Table 2. Nutrient contents in soybean plants sprayed with DOP and exposed to Cd excess.
Cd2+DOPK (mg g DM−1)Ca (mg g DM−1)Mg (mg g DM−1)Mn (µg g DM−1)Fe (µg g DM−1)Zn (µg g DM−1)
Contents in root
−−34.52 ± 0.68 a13.20 ± 0.60 a14.05 ± 0.50 a444.66 ± 21.76 a4869.19 ± 156.89 a50.75 ± 0.72 b
−+35.21 ± 0.35 a13.36 ± 0.05 a14.08 ± 0.20 a449.99 ± 13.20 a4907.15 ± 34.44 a52.74 ± 0.81 a
+−23.54 ± 0.74 c 8.61 ± 0.49 c10.61 ± 0.80 c222.51 ± 5.78 c2489.83 ± 106.04 c28.21 ± 1.15 d
++31.49 ± 0.92 b11.80 ± 0.67 b12.92 ± 0.32 b352.31 ± 9.28 b3901.83 ± 107.38 b35.66 ± 1.21 c
Contents in stem
−−61.06 ± 0.58 a12.02 ± 0.49 b2.55 ± 0.15 a29.24 ± 0.40 a44.07 ± 1.06 a12.31 ± 1.03 a
−+62.00 ± 1.83 a12.88 ± 0.26 a2.65 ± 0.09 a30.07 ± 0.34 a45.41 ± 2.67 a12.75 ± 0.55 a
+−41.64 ± 0.88 c7.98 ± 0.11 d1.26 ± 0.02 c14.77 ± 0.53 c24.23 ± 1.23 c8.30 ± 0.63 c
++49.75 ± 0.91 b9.86 ± 0.64 c1.90 ± 0.08 b20.19 ± 1.09 b32.59 ± 1.07 b9.77 ± 0.66 b
Contents in leaf
−−39.38 ± 0.57 a14.02 ± 0.53 a4.46 ± 0.13 a74.17 ± 0.66 a141.72 ± 1.44 a25.87 ± 0.55 a
−+40.55 ± 1.40 a14.51 ± 0.46 a4.51 ± 0.10 a75.35 ± 2.48 a147.74 ± 1.76 a26.75 ± 0.90 a
+−29.50 ± 1.13 c10.51 ± 0.61 c3.27 ± 0.15 c56.46 ± 1.33 c105.14 ± 3.47 c20.48 ± 0.41 c
++35.37 ± 0.26 b12.22 ± 0.89 b4.08 ± 0.08 b69.18 ± 0.83 b128.56 ± 7.74 b22.96 ± 0.83 b
Cd2+ = cadmium; DOP = dopamine; K = potassium; Ca = calcium; Mg = magnesium; Mn = manganese; Fe = iron; Zn = zinc. Columns with different letters indicate significant differences from the Scott-Knott test (p < 0.05). Values described correspond to means from five repetitions and standard deviations.
Table 3. Photosynthetic pigments, chlorophyll fluorescence and gas exchange in soybean plants sprayed with DOP and exposed to Cd excess.
Table 3. Photosynthetic pigments, chlorophyll fluorescence and gas exchange in soybean plants sprayed with DOP and exposed to Cd excess.
Cd2+DOPChl a (mg g−1 FM)Chl b (mg g−1 FM)Total Chl (mg g−1 FM)Car (mg g−1 FM)Ratio Chl a/Chl bRatio Total Chl/Car
−−12.00 ± 0.35 a4.95 ± 0.29 a16.94 ± 0.41 b1.13 ± 0.06 a2.43 ± 0.18 a15.04 ± 0.98 a
−+12.30 ± 0.21 a5.11 ± 0.14 a17.42 ± 0.10 a1.16 ± 0.03 a2.41 ± 0.11 a14.98 ± 0.51 a
+−6.95 ± 0.45 c2.59 ± 0.19 c9.54 ± 0.53 d0.60 ± 0.03 c2.69 ± 0.22 a15.79 ± 0.60 a
++9.50 ± 0.26 b3.75 ± 0.26 b13.25 ± 0.15 c0.87 ± 0.02 b2.54 ± 0.23 a15.25 ± 0.45 a
Cd2+DOPΦPSIIqPNPQETR (µmol m−2 s−1)EXC (µmol m−2 s−1)ETR/PN
−−0.381 ± 0.020 b0.559 ± 0.025 a0.90 ± 0.11 b55.98 ± 2.89 b0.525 ± 0.025 b2.96 ± 0.20 a
−+0.405 ± 0.007 a0.572 ± 0.010 a0.80 ± 0.07 b59.46 ± 1.07 a0.502 ± 0.010 c3.12 ± 0.02 a
+−0.285 ± 0.011 d0.472 ± 0.013 b1.10 ± 0.06 a41.85 ± 1.69 d0.626 ± 0.011 a3.13 ± 0.09 a
++0.358 ± 0.017 c0.556 ± 0.036 a1.03 ± 0.09 a52.62 ± 2.57 c0.545 ± 0.021 b3.06 ± 0.23 a
Cd2+DOPPN (µmol m−2 s−1)E (mmol m−2 s−1)gs (mol m−2 s−1)Ci (µmol mol−1)WUE (µmol mmol−1)PN/Ci (µmol m−2 s−1 Pa−1)
−−18.91 ± 0.56 a1.86 ± 0.07 b0.228 ± 0.011 a232 ± 7 b10.15 ± 0.25 b0.082 ± 0.004 b
−+19.05 ± 0.40 a1.70 ± 0.07 c0.246 ± 0.021 a201 ± 14 c11.24 ± 0.60 a0.095 ± 0.008 a
+−13.38 ± 0.79 c2.03 ± 0.03 a0.132 ± 0.013 c262 ± 23 a6.60 ± 0.43 d0.051 ± 0.005 d
++17.31 ± 0.93 b1.90 ± 0.03 b0.178 ± 0.013 b245 ± 8 b9.12 ± 0.44 c0.071 ± 0.003 c
Cd2+ = cadmium; DOP = dopamine; Chl a = chlorophyll a; Chl b = chlorophyll b; Total chl = total chlorophyll; Car = carotenoids; ΦPSII = effective quantum yield of PSII photochemistry; qP = photochemical quenching coefficient; NPQ = nonphotochemical quenching; ETR = electron transport rate; EXC = relative energy excess at the PSII level; ETR/PN = ratio between the electron transport rate and net photosynthetic rate; PN = net photosynthetic rate; E = transpiration rate; gs = stomatal conductance; Ci = intercellular CO2 concentration; WUE = water-use efficiency; PN/Ci = carboxylation instantaneous efficiency. Columns with different letters indicate significant differences from the Scott-Knott test (p < 0.05). Values described correspond to means from five repetitions and standard deviations.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Carmo, A.S.; Pontes, C.V.d.S.; Augusto, C.C.; Batista, B.L.; Lobato, A.K.d.S. Dopamine Spraying Protects Against Cadmium-Induced Oxidative Stress and Stimulates Photosynthesis in Soybean Plants. Plants 2025, 14, 3411. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14223411

AMA Style

Carmo AS, Pontes CVdS, Augusto CC, Batista BL, Lobato AKdS. Dopamine Spraying Protects Against Cadmium-Induced Oxidative Stress and Stimulates Photosynthesis in Soybean Plants. Plants. 2025; 14(22):3411. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14223411

Chicago/Turabian Style

Carmo, Andreza Sousa, Caio Victor da Silva Pontes, Caroline Cristine Augusto, Bruno Lemos Batista, and Allan Klynger da Silva Lobato. 2025. "Dopamine Spraying Protects Against Cadmium-Induced Oxidative Stress and Stimulates Photosynthesis in Soybean Plants" Plants 14, no. 22: 3411. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14223411

APA Style

Carmo, A. S., Pontes, C. V. d. S., Augusto, C. C., Batista, B. L., & Lobato, A. K. d. S. (2025). Dopamine Spraying Protects Against Cadmium-Induced Oxidative Stress and Stimulates Photosynthesis in Soybean Plants. Plants, 14(22), 3411. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14223411

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop