Next Article in Journal
The Research Process of PSK Biosynthesis, Signaling Transduction, and Potential Applications in Brassica napus
Next Article in Special Issue
Haploid Induction in Indica Rice: Exploring New Opportunities
Previous Article in Journal
Managing Weed–Crop Interactions Enhances Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Chemical Components
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development of a New Micropropagation Protocol and Transfer of In Vitro Plants to In Vivo Conditions for Cascade Hop
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Improvements in Protoplast Isolation Protocol and Regeneration of Different Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.) Cultivars

Plants 2023, 12(17), 3074; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12173074
by Ester Stajič
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Plants 2023, 12(17), 3074; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12173074
Submission received: 4 August 2023 / Revised: 19 August 2023 / Accepted: 22 August 2023 / Published: 27 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances and Applications in Plant Tissue Culture)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear authors, please find my comments in the attached file.

Best regards,

a reviewer

Comments for author File: Comments.docx

please have the language checked by a native speaker.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

thank you very much for your careful reading and proposed improvements. The suggested changes have been made. Please find point-by-point response in the attachment.

Yours sincerely,

Ester Stajič

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

 

Review report 

General comments: -

This study is very interesting and has a scientific topic with a great impact on the field. The manuscript will be suitable for publication after taking care of the following minor comments.

Detailed comments:

1-The English language and /writing style is fine needs some minor check spelling and grammar check.

2-Please avoid using the personal pronouns (I, We,) such as in line 13 (we in our experiments), in line88 (we focused )and more .

Abstract

_This section is well written

Keywords:

-The keywords has been chosen very carefully and accurately.

Introduction

-The introduction doesn’t provide sufficient background and it is missing enough relevant references

-This section needs to be elongated and enriched with more background about this topic.

Materials and Methods

It is ok and adequate 

 Results:

The results are very interesting and well presented but figure 5f shoot generation not clear to me.

Discussion:

This section is poorly written

The author is strongly advised to combine the results and discussion in one section for better interpretation and discussion for the presented data especially data in Figure 5 and Table4

Please rewrite and discuss in details, and fully discussed with related citations.

Conclusion 

This section is well written and the conclusion is supported by the results of this study and includes the most important findings.

References

  •  

This section is well written and UpToDate.

The English and style style is ok just some minor spelling and grammar check up is required.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

thank you very much for your careful reading and proposed improvements. The suggested changes have been made. Please find point-by-point response in the attachment.

Yours sincerely,

Ester Stajič

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop