Is “Esterhazy II”, an Old Walnut Variety in the Hungarian Gene Bank, the Original Genotype?
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Phenology
2.2. Nut Characteristics
2.3. Genetic Analysis
3. Discussion
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Description of the Varieties Involved in the Trial
4.1.1. “Esterhazy II” Genotype
4.1.2. Milotai 10
4.1.3. Chandler
4.1.4. Description of the Trial’s Site Conditions
4.1.5. Phenological Observations and Nut Morphology
4.1.6. Genetic Analysis
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bujdosó, G.; Gandev, S.; Izsépi, F.; Szügyi-Bartha, K.; Végvári, G. Detection and quantification of some phenolic compounds in kernel of selected Hungarian and Bulgarian Persian walnut cultivars. Eur. J. Hortic. Sci. 2019, 84, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bujdosó, G.; Izsépi, F.; Bartha, K.S.; Varjas, V.; Szentiványi, P. Persian walnut breeding program at Naric Fruticulture Research Institute in Hungary. Acta Hortic. 2020, 1280, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terpó, A. Növényrendszertan az ökonómbotanika alapjaival. Juglandaceae. In Plant Taxonomy with Basis of Botany. Juglandaceae. Mezőgazdasági Kiadó; Mezógazda Publisher: Budapest, Hungary, 1976; Volume II, p. 472. [Google Scholar]
- Ebrahimi, A.; Zarei, A.; McKennac, J.R.; Bujdosó, G.; Woestec, K.E. Genetic diversity of Persian walnut (Juglans regia) in the cold-temperate zone of the United States and Europe. Sci. Hortic. 2017, 220, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bujdosó, G.; Varjas, V.; Szügyi-Bartha, K.; Tóth-Nagy, A. Evaluation of the novel bred Persian walnut genotypes. Agrolife Sci. J. 2019, 8, 60–65. [Google Scholar]
- Gyümölcsültetvények Összeírása. Data Collection of the Orchards in Hungary. 2017. Available online: https://www.ksh.hu/elemzesek/gyumolcs2017_elozetes/index.html (accessed on 11 October 2018).
- Badescu, G.; Blaja, D.; Bumbac, E.; Cireasa, V.; Cociu, V.; Cojocaru, S.; Coman, S.; Costetchi, M.; Dima, G.; Gozob, T.; et al. Veres SPomologia, V.I.; Editura Academiei Republicii Socieliste: Bucharest, Romania, 1967; pp. 53–86. [Google Scholar]
- Bernard, A.; Dirlewanger, E.; Lheureux, F. The French walnut improvement program: Preliminary investigations. Acta Hortic. 2020, 1280, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciceoi, R.; Stanica, F.; Wang, G.; Chang, Y.; Wu, J. Sino-Romanian collaboration for walnut breeding. Acta Hortic. 2012, 940, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, G.L.; Meng, H.J.; Hao, Y.Y.; Liu, Q.L.; Wang, D.; Tian, J.B. Thirty years of breeding walnut in China. Acta Hortic. 2009, 861, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassani, D.; Sarikhani, S.; Dastjerdi, R.; Mahmoudi, R.; Soleimani, A.; Vahdati, K. Situation and recent trends on cultivation and breeding of Persian walnut in Iran. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 270, 109369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akça, Y.; Yuldaşulu, Y.B.; Murad, E.; Vahdati, K. Exploring of Walnut Genetic Resources in Kazakhstan and Evaluation of Promising Selections. Int. J. Hortic. Sci. Technol. 2020, 2, 93–102. [Google Scholar]
- Jenkins, T.A.; Marsh, C.; Lang, M.D.; Vanestre, J.; Walter, M.; Obanor, F. Walnut Blight Sustainable Management Research in New Zealand. Acta Hortic. 2009, 861, 479–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Botu, M.; Tudor, M.; Papachatzis, A. Evaluation of some walnut cultivars with different bearing habits in the ecological conditions of Oltenia—Romania. Acta Hortic. 2010, 861, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thiesz, R.; Bandi, A.; Tóth, M.; Balog, A. Epidemiological survey of Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis and Gnomonia leptostyla on natural population of walnut (Juglans regia) in eastern Transylvania. Int. J. Hortic. Sci. 2007, 13, 7–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cerovic, S.; Golosin, B.; Ninic Todorovic, J.; Bijelic, S.; Ognjanos, V. Walnut (Juglans regia L.) selection in Serbia. Hort. Sci. (Prague) 2010, 1, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Solar, A.; Stampar, F. Evaluation of some perspective walnut genotypes in Slovenia. Acta Hortic. 2005, 705, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Priyadarshan, P.M. (Ed.) Breeding Plantation Tree Crops: Temperate Species; Springer Science Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 249–272. [Google Scholar]
- Böllersen, V. Revival der Walnuss Revival of Walnut. Sortenkatalog Variety Register; Organischer Landbau Verlag: Kevelaer, Germany, 2017; p. 125. [Google Scholar]
- Szentiványi, P.; Kállay, T. (Eds.) Dió. Persian Walnut; Mezőgazda Kiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 2006; pp. 66–67. [Google Scholar]
- Walnuss ‘Esterhazy II’ Veredelung. Available online: https://www.baumschule-horstmann.de/walnuss-esterhazy-ii-veredelung-64_46662.html (accessed on 5 August 2020).
- Walnuss Esterhazy II. Available online: https://www.walnuss24.de/walnussbaum/walnussbaum-sorten/53-esterhazy-ii (accessed on 5 August 2020).
- Die 12 Beliebtesten Walnussbaum-Sorten. Available online: https://www.walnussbaum.info/sorten.php#esterhazy2 (accessed on 5 August 2020).
- Sortenratgeber. Available online: https://www.walnussveredlung.de/html/sortenratgeber.html (accessed on 5 August 2020).
- Szentiványi, P. Régi diófajták a biokertekben Old historic walnut cultivars in the oecological gardens. Biokultura 2002, 4, 15–17. [Google Scholar]
- Mohácsy, M.; Magyar, G. Dió-, Mandula-, Mogyoró-és Gesztenyetermesztés Walnut, Almond, Hazelnut and Chestnut Growing; Pátria Kiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 1936; p. 27. [Google Scholar]
- Bujdosó, G.; Kónya, É.; Berki, M.; Nagy-Gasztonyi, M.; Bartha-Szügyi, K.; Marton, B.; Izsépi, F.; Adányi, N. Fatty acid composition, oxidative stability, and antioxidant properties of some Hungarian and other Persian walnut cultivars. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2016, 40, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramos, D.E. (Ed.) Walnut Production Manual; University of California: Oakland, CA, USA, 1998; pp. 84–89. [Google Scholar]
- Aleta, N.; Rovira, M.; Ninot, A.; Vilanova, A. ‘Chandler’ walnut trees trained in three kinds of central leader: Structured, semi-structured and free—results at the age of six. Acta Hortic. 2005, 705, 479–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Connell, J.; Olson, W.; Limberg, J.; Metcalf, S. Effects of Various Roots on ‘Chandler’ Walnut Catkin And Pistillate Bloom, Tree Growth, Yield, and Nut Quality. Acta Hortic. 2010, 861, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dobos, E.; Bialkó, T.; Micheli, E.; Kobza, J. Legacy Soil Data Harmonization and Database Development. Digit. Soil Mapp. 2010, IV, 309–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bulletin de Santé de Vegétal (Published on 19 April 2016). Available online: http://www.fredon-limousin.fr/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/20160404_BSV_NOIX_SO_2_VF.pdf (accessed on 5 May 2020).
- Noix Correze-Quercy-Perigord. Bulletin No. 6. (Published on 16th May 2012). Available online: http://www.fredon-limousin.fr/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/BSV_NOIX_SO_6_16mai2012.pdf (accessed on 19 April 2020).
- Dumolin, S.; Demesure, B.; Petit, R.J. Inheritance of chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes in pedunculate oak investigated with an efficient PCR method. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1995, 91, 1253–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woeste, K.; Burns, R.; Rhodes, O.; Michler, C. Thirty polymorphic nuclear microsatellite loci from black walnut. J. Hered. 2002, 93, 58–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Dangl, G.S.; Woeste, K.; Aradhya, M.K.; Koehmstedt, A.; Simon, C.; Potter, D.; Leslie, C.A.; McGranahan, G. Characterization of 14 Microsatellite Markers for Genetic Analysis and Cultivar Identification of Walnut. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2005, 130, 348–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dang, M.; Zhang, T.; Hu, Y.; Zhou, H.; Woeste, K.E.; Zhao, P. De Novo Assembly and Characterization of Bud, Leaf and Flowers Transcriptome from Juglans regia L. for the Identification and Characterization of New EST-SSRs. Forests 2016, 7, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schuelke, M. An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat. Biotechnol. 2000, 18, 233–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peakall, R.; Smouse, P.E. GENALEX 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2006, 6, 288–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peakall, R.; Smouse, P.E. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—An update. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 2537–2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hammer, Ø.; Harper, D.A.T.; Ryan, P.D. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 2001, 1, 9. [Google Scholar]
Esterhazy II | Milotai 10 | Chandler | SD5% | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Calendar Days (Day, Month) ± SD (Days) | ||||
Beginning of budbreak | 27 April ± 3.8 d a | 7th April ± 10.6 d bc | 16th April ± 10.0 d bc | 6.3 d |
End of budbreak | 4 May ± 4.3 d a | 24 April ± 7.3 d b | 24 April ± 7.3 d b | 5.1 d |
Length of budbreak | 12.7 d ± 5.2 d a | 19.9 d ± 7.5 d ab | 19.9 d ± 7.5 d ab | 3.8 d |
Esterhazy II | Milotai 10 | Chandler | SD5% | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Calendar Days (Day, Month) ± SD (Days) | ||||
Beginning of first male bloom | 3 May ± 2.8 d a | 28 April ± 5.3 d b | 23 April ± 4.7 d bc | 3.3 d |
End of the first male bloom | 12 May ± 5.1 d a | 7 May ± 3.1 d b | 4 May ± 6.4 d ab | 4.1 d |
Length of first male bloom | 9.1 d ± 3.3 d a | 9.0 d ± 4.9 d a | 11.0 d ± 3.4 d ab | 4.4 d |
Esterhazy II | Milotai 10 | Chandler | SD5% | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Calendar Days (Day, Month) ± SD (Days) | ||||
Start of first female bloom | 6 May ± 3.7 d a | 23 April ± 7.8 d b | 5 May ± 3.7 d a | 4.4 d |
End of the first female bloom | 12 May ± 3.7 d a | 5 May ± 5.5 d b | 13 May ± 5.1 d a | 3.9 d |
Length of first female bloom | 5.1 d ± 3.3 d a | 13.0 d ± 5.7 d a | 8.0 d ± 2.3 d b | 3.3 d |
Harvest Time | |
---|---|
Calendar Days (Day, Month) ± SD (Days) | |
Esterhazy II | 21 September ± 3.2 d a |
Milotai 10 | 17 September ± 6.7 d ab |
Chandler | 27 September ± 6.4 d a |
SD5% | 5.2 d |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Bujdoso, G.; Illes, B.; Varjas, V.; Cseke, K. Is “Esterhazy II”, an Old Walnut Variety in the Hungarian Gene Bank, the Original Genotype? Plants 2021, 10, 854. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10050854
Bujdoso G, Illes B, Varjas V, Cseke K. Is “Esterhazy II”, an Old Walnut Variety in the Hungarian Gene Bank, the Original Genotype? Plants. 2021; 10(5):854. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10050854
Chicago/Turabian StyleBujdoso, Geza, Benjamin Illes, Virag Varjas, and Klara Cseke. 2021. "Is “Esterhazy II”, an Old Walnut Variety in the Hungarian Gene Bank, the Original Genotype?" Plants 10, no. 5: 854. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10050854