Knowledge-Driven Adaptive Direct Sampling for Reconstructing Geochemical Fields Under Sampling Bias
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area and Data Description
2.2. Knowledge-Driven Adaptive Sampling Strategy
2.3. Dynamic Context-Aware Neighborhood Mechanism
3. Experiments and Discussions
3.1. Training Image Construction and Parameter Settings
3.2. Ablation Study
3.3. Qualitative Comparative Analysis: Pattern Reconstruction and Fidelity
3.4. Quantitative Performance Evaluation
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Yin, B.; Zuo, R.; Xiong, Y.; Li, Y.; Yang, W. Knowledge Discovery of Geochemical Patterns from a Data-Driven Perspective. J. Geochem. Explor. 2021, 231, 106872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erdogan Erten, G.; Yavuz, M.; Deutsch, C.V. Combination of Machine Learning and Kriging for Spatial Estimation of Geological Attributes. Nat. Resour. Res. 2022, 31, 191–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosseini-Dinani, H.; Mokhtari, A.R.; Shahrestani, S.; De Vivo, B. Sampling Density in Regional Exploration and Environmental Geochemical Studies: A Review. Nat. Resour. Res. 2019, 28, 967–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, M.; Xue, L.; Ran, X.; Sang, X.; Yan, Q.; Dai, J. Intelligent mineral geological survey method: Daqiao-Yawan area in Gansu Province as an example. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2021, 37, 3880–3892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, K.; Fang, Y.; Lian, Y.; Hu, M.; He, H. Application of Different Spatial Interpolation Methods in Sodium Intake Estimation. J. Hyg. Res. 2021, 50, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasanipanah, M.; Meng, D.; Keshtegar, B.; Trung, N.-T.; Thai, D.-K. Nonlinear Models Based on Enhanced Kriging Interpolation for Prediction of Rock Joint Shear Strength. Neural Comput. Appl. 2021, 33, 4205–4215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z. An Enhanced Dual IDW Method for High-Quality Geospatial Interpolation. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 9903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, W.; Liu, G.; Chen, Q.; Lu, L.; Cui, Z.; Zuo, B.; Wu, X. Extraction of Weak Geochemical Anomalies Based on Multiple-Point Statistics and Local Singularity Analysis. Comput. Geosci. 2024, 28, 157–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Li, M.; Liu, Z.; Li, C. Combining Kriging Interpolation to Improve the Accuracy of Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation Using Remote Sensing Data. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 128124–128139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strebelle, S. Conditional Simulation of Complex Geological Structures Using Multiple-Point Statistics. Math. Geol. 2002, 34, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdollahifard, M.J. Fast Multiple-Point Simulation Using a Data-Driven Path and an Efficient Gradient-Based Search. Comput. Geosci. 2016, 86, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, M.; Shang, X.; Duan, T. A review of the establishment methods of training image in multiple-point statistics modeling. Geol. J. China Univ. 2022, 28, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neven, A.; Dall’Alba, V.; Juda, P.; Straubhaar, J.; Renard, P. Ice Volume and Basal Topography Estimation Using Geostatistical Methods and Ground-Penetrating Radar Measurements: Application to the Tsanfleuron and Scex Rouge Glaciers, Swiss Alps. Cryosphere 2021, 15, 5169–5186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brilliant, E.; Wardhana, S.; Bilqis, A.; Nurdianingsih, A.; Daniswara, R.; Pranowo, W. A Python Based Multi-Point Geostatistics by Using Direct Sampling Algorithm. J. Geofis. 2020, 18, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.; Liu, B.; Guo, K.; Li, B.; Kong, Y. Regional Geochemical Anomaly Identification Based on Multiple-Point Geostatistical Simulation and Local Singularity Analysis—A Case Study in Mila Mountain Region, Southern Tibet. Minerals 2021, 11, 1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, M.; Xia, Q.; Li, W. Identifying Geochemical Element Distribution Patterns through Multiple-Point Geostatistical Simulation and Singularity Analysis: A Case Study of the Wulonggou-Balong Area, Qinghai, China. Geochemistry 2025, 85, 126294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hansen, T.M.; Vu, L.T.; Mosegaard, K.; Cordua, K.S. Multiple Point Statistical Simulation Using Uncertain (Soft) Conditional Data. Comput. Geosci. 2018, 114, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Journel, A. Improving Sequential Simulation with a Structured Path Guided by Information Content. Math. Geol. 2004, 36, 945–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Q.; Liu, G.; Ma, X.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, X. Conditional Multiple-Point Geostatistical Simulation for Unevenly Distributed Sample Data. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2019, 33, 973–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mariethoz, G.; Renard, P.; Straubhaar, J. The Direct Sampling Method to Perform Multiple-Point Geostatistical Simulations. Water Resour. Res. 2010, 46, W11536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tahmasebi, P. Multiple Point Statistics: A Review. In Handbook of Mathematical Geosciences: Fifty Years of IAMG; Daya Sagar, B.S., Cheng, Q., Agterberg, F., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 613–643. [Google Scholar]
- Mariethoz, G.; Caers, J. Multiple-Point Geostatistics: Stochastic Modeling with Training Images, 1st ed.; John Wiley & Sons Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, J. Identification of Geochemical Anomalies Based on Geostatistical Simulation. Ph.D. Thesis, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Z.; Zuo, R.; Yang, F. Geological Mapping Using Direct Sampling and a Convolutional Neural Network Based on Geochemical Survey Data. Math. Geosci. 2023, 55, 1035–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosseini, S.T.; Asghari, O.; Emery, X. An Enhanced Direct Sampling (DS) Approach to Model the Geological Domain with Locally Varying Proportions: Application to Golgohar Iron Ore Mine, Iran. Ore Geol. Rev. 2021, 139, 104452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Straubhaar, J.; Renard, P. Conditioning Multiple-Point Statistics Simulation to Inequality Data. Earth Space Sci. 2021, 8, e2020EA001515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gravey, M.; Mariethoz, G. QuickSampling v1.0: A Robust and Simplified Pixel-Based Multiple-Point Simulation Approach. Geosci. Model Dev. 2020, 13, 2611–2630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gravey, M.; Mariethoz, G. AutoQS v1: Automatic Parametrization of QuickSampling Based on Training Images Analysis. Geosci. Model Dev. 2023, 16, 5265–5279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Juda, P.; Renard, P.; Straubhaar, J. A Parsimonious Parametrization of the Direct Sampling Algorithm for Multiple-Point Statistical Simulations. Appl. Comput. Geosci. 2022, 16, 100091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, H.; Yang, M.; Mariethoz, G. A Fast Two Part Direct Sampling Method Based on Interpolation. Comput. Geosci. 2023, 175, 105335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niu, X.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, W.; Niu, Y.; Guo, D.; Ding, G.; Mao, W. Comparative Application of S-A Multifractal Method to Geochemical Anomaly Delineation: A Case Study of the Wenkang Area, Gansu Province. Geol. Explor. 2023, 59, 817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Xiong, Y.; Chen, Z. Recognizing Geochemical Spatial Patterns Using Deformable Convolutional Networks Guided with Geological Knowledge. EGUsphere 2025, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costa, J.F.C.L.; Niquini, F.G.F.; Schneider, C.L.; Alcântara, R.M.; Capponi, L.N.; Rodrigues, R.S. Geometallurgical Cluster Creation in a Niobium Deposit Using Dual-Space Clustering and Hierarchical Indicator Kriging with Trends. Minerals 2025, 15, 755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shirjang, M.; Maghsoudi, A.; Ghezelbash, R. Analysis of Clustering Methods for Geochemical Anomaly Identification through Weighted Sample Catchment Basins. Geochemistry 2025, 85, 126337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Q.; Zhou, R.; Liu, C.; Huang, Q.; Cui, Z.; Liu, G. pyMPSLib: A Robust and Scalable Open-Source Python Library for Mutiple-Point Statistical Simulation. Earth Sci. Inform. 2023, 16, 3179–3190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, Z. Current Situation and Research Progress of Tungsten Ore Development and Utilization. Adv. Geosci. 2025, 15, 382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, G.; Wang, D.; Huang, C.; Yang, F.; Xu, Y.; Feng, Z.; Li, X.; Zeng, Q.; Yan, C. Fan-shaped case and exploration model of quartz vein-type tungsten polymetallic deposits. Miner. Depos. 2024, 43, 613–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Liu, H.; Nie, C.; Zhang, J.; Steenari, B.-M.; Ekberg, C. Comprehensive Treatments of Tungsten Slags in China: A Critical Review. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 270, 110927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, J.; Yang, Y.; Chen, Q.; Chen, S.; Chen, X.; Zhang, R. Deposit Types, Spatial Distribution, Development, and Utilization of Tungsten Deposits in China. Acta Geosci. Sin. 2025, 46, 945–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, W.; Li, Z.; Chen, C.; Wu, C.; Gao, Y.; Zeng, J.; Zhang, B.; Ge, Z.; Wu, Q.; Wang, N.; et al. Analysis of the situation of global tungsten resources and the current status of development and utilization in China. China Min. Mag. 2025, 34, 429–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ni, P.; Pan, J.-Y.; Han, L.; Cui, J.-M.; Gao, Y.; Fan, M.-S.; Li, W.-S.; Chi, Z.; Zhang, K.-H.; Cheng, Z.-L.; et al. Tungsten and Tin Deposits in South China: Temporal and Spatial Distribution, Metallogenic Models and Prospecting Directions. Ore Geol. Rev. 2023, 157, 105453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]







| Element | Min | Max | Mean | Skewness | Kurtosis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | 1.70 | 1846.93 | 33.34 | 10.42 | 162.82 |
| Mo | 0.35 | 52.40 | 2.05 | 7.75 | 87.88 |
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Distance threshold | 0.1 |
| Search radius | 20 |
| Maximum number of nodes | 40 |
| Max fraction of TI | 0.5 |
| Knowledge-Driven Adaptive Sampling Strategy | Dynamic Context-Aware Neighborhood Mechanism | Mean Bias | RMSE | JSD | Time (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | −0.2453 | 4.2808 | 0.0982 | 29.41 |
| √ | - | −0.0596 | 4.4633 | 0.0971 | 32.02 |
| - | √ | −0.1916 | 4.4429 | 0.1673 | 33.67 |
| √ | √ | −0.2024 | 4.0164 | 0.1643 | 32.89 |
| Data | Method | Max Value | 95th Percentile | 99th Percentile | Exceedance Rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | TI | 594.66 | 35.55 | 64.42 | 5.00 |
| DS | 546.70 | 36.08 | 64.41 | 5.44 | |
| KD-ADS | 224.05 | 38.09 | 77.67 | 7.14 | |
| Mo | TI | 13.18 | 5.38 | 8.75 | 5.00 |
| DS | 10.69 | 6.41 | 8.63 | 7.03 | |
| KD-ADS | 10.85 | 6.22 | 8.84 | 6.41 |
| Data | Method | RMSE | Mean Bias | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | OK | 30.47 | 0.6945 | 0.8919 | 2.6032 |
| DS | 57.38 ± 2.84 | −0.086 ± 0.11 | −0.005 ± 0.05 | 4.09 ± 1.00 | |
| KD-ADS | 57.26 ± 2.37 | −0.083 ± 0.09 | −0.001 ± 0.04 | 4.50 ± 1.01 | |
| Mo | OK | 2.85 | 0.4841 | 0.7437 | −0.0416 |
| DS | 4.34 ± 0.12 | −0.198 ± 0.06 | −0.005 ± 0.06 | −0.139 ± 0.12 | |
| KD-ADS | 4.32 ± 0.11 | −0.187 ± 0.06 | −0.002 ± 0.05 | −0.002 ± 0.13 |
| Data | Method | Time (s) |
|---|---|---|
| W | DS | 27.95 |
| KD-ADS | 25.22 | |
| Mo | DS | 27.56 |
| KD-ADS | 27.30 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Published by MDPI on behalf of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Liu, Y.; Zi, J.; Dong, Y.; Xu, N.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, F. Knowledge-Driven Adaptive Direct Sampling for Reconstructing Geochemical Fields Under Sampling Bias. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2026, 15, 111. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi15030111
Liu Y, Zi J, Dong Y, Xu N, Zhang Q, Chen F. Knowledge-Driven Adaptive Direct Sampling for Reconstructing Geochemical Fields Under Sampling Bias. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2026; 15(3):111. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi15030111
Chicago/Turabian StyleLiu, Yameng, Jiali Zi, Yanqi Dong, Nuo Xu, Qing Zhang, and Feixiang Chen. 2026. "Knowledge-Driven Adaptive Direct Sampling for Reconstructing Geochemical Fields Under Sampling Bias" ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 15, no. 3: 111. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi15030111
APA StyleLiu, Y., Zi, J., Dong, Y., Xu, N., Zhang, Q., & Chen, F. (2026). Knowledge-Driven Adaptive Direct Sampling for Reconstructing Geochemical Fields Under Sampling Bias. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 15(3), 111. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi15030111

