Next Article in Journal
Developing Relative Spatial Poverty Index Using Integrated Remote Sensing and Geospatial Big Data Approach: A Case Study of East Java, Indonesia
Previous Article in Journal
An Empirical Study on the Effects of Temporal Trends in Spatial Patterns on Animated Choropleth Maps
Previous Article in Special Issue
Quantification of Spatial Association between Commercial and Residential Spaces in Beijing Using Urban Big Data
 
 
Article

Managing Inhomogeneity in the Control Point Network during Staking Out Cadastral Boundaries in Austria

1
Geolanz ZT GmbH, 4020 Linz, Austria
2
Department of Geodesy and Geoinformation, TU Wien, 1040 Vienna, Austria
3
BEV, Austrian Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying, 1020 Vienna, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Academic Editors: Dev Raj Paudyal and Wolfgang Kainz
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2022, 11(5), 274; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11050274
Received: 1 March 2022 / Revised: 11 April 2022 / Accepted: 15 April 2022 / Published: 21 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of GIScience for Land Administration)
The coordinate system of the Austrian cadastre is physically realised through control points provided by the national institution for surveying. Due to historical development over the centuries and changes in measurement technologies, inhomogeneities can occur within the local control point network. These inhomogeneities affect the derived boundary point coordinates. When staking out boundary points in an area with inhomogeneous control points, deviations from the boundary marks in the field can occur that exceed the accuracy requirements of the ordinance for surveying. Examples show that a suitable approach to tackle this issue has to be selected on a case-based strategy. Different situations might require different approaches. This needs to be considered in the legal framework to enable cadastral experts to select the optimal approach. View Full-Text
Keywords: cadastre; inhomogeneity; control points; staking out; procedure; integration of geospatial data; coordinate adjustment cadastre; inhomogeneity; control points; staking out; procedure; integration of geospatial data; coordinate adjustment
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Weber, V.; Navratil, G.; Blauensteiner, F. Managing Inhomogeneity in the Control Point Network during Staking Out Cadastral Boundaries in Austria. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2022, 11, 274. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11050274

AMA Style

Weber V, Navratil G, Blauensteiner F. Managing Inhomogeneity in the Control Point Network during Staking Out Cadastral Boundaries in Austria. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2022; 11(5):274. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11050274

Chicago/Turabian Style

Weber, Valentin, Gerhard Navratil, and Franz Blauensteiner. 2022. "Managing Inhomogeneity in the Control Point Network during Staking Out Cadastral Boundaries in Austria" ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 11, no. 5: 274. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11050274

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop