Next Article in Journal
Advances in Agriculture Robotics: A State-of-the-Art Review and Challenges Ahead
Next Article in Special Issue
Human–Robot Interaction through Eye Tracking for Artistic Drawing
Previous Article in Journal
Industrial Robot Trajectory Tracking Control Using Multi-Layer Neural Networks Trained by Iterative Learning Control
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cobot User Frame Calibration: Evaluation and Comparison between Positioning Repeatability Performances Achieved by Traditional and Vision-Based Methods
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Explanations from a Robotic Partner Build Trust on the Robot’s Decisions for Collaborative Human-Humanoid Interaction

by
Misbah Javaid
1,* and
Vladimir Estivill-Castro
2
1
School of Information and Communication Technology, Griffith University, Brisbane 4111, Australia
2
Departament de Tecnologies de la Informació i les Comunicacions, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08018 Barcelona, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Robotics 2021, 10(1), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics10010051
Submission received: 1 November 2020 / Revised: 5 February 2021 / Accepted: 16 March 2021 / Published: 23 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human–Robot Collaboration)

Abstract

Typically, humans interact with a humanoid robot with apprehension. This lack of trust can seriously affect the effectiveness of a team of robots and humans. We can create effective interactions that generate trust by augmenting robots with an explanation capability. The explanations provide justification and transparency to the robot’s decisions. To demonstrate such effective interaction, we tested this with an interactive, game-playing environment with partial information that requires team collaboration, using a game called Spanish Domino. We partner a robot with a human to form a pair, and this team opposes a team of two humans. We performed a user study with sixty-three human participants in different settings, investigating the effect of the robot’s explanations on the humans’ trust and perception of the robot’s behaviour. Our explanation-generation mechanism produces natural-language sentences that translate the decision taken by the robot into human-understandable terms. We video-recorded all interactions to analyse factors such as the participants’ relational behaviours with the robot, and we also used questionnaires to measure the participants’ explicit trust in the robot. Overall, our main results demonstrate that explanations enhanced the participants’ understandability of the robot’s decisions, because we observed a significant increase in the participants’ level of trust in their robotic partner. These results suggest that explanations, stating the reason(s) for a decision, combined with the transparency of the decision-making process, facilitate collaborative human–humanoid interactions.
Keywords: trust; decision explanations; human-humanoid interaction trust; decision explanations; human-humanoid interaction

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Javaid, M.; Estivill-Castro, V. Explanations from a Robotic Partner Build Trust on the Robot’s Decisions for Collaborative Human-Humanoid Interaction. Robotics 2021, 10, 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics10010051

AMA Style

Javaid M, Estivill-Castro V. Explanations from a Robotic Partner Build Trust on the Robot’s Decisions for Collaborative Human-Humanoid Interaction. Robotics. 2021; 10(1):51. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics10010051

Chicago/Turabian Style

Javaid, Misbah, and Vladimir Estivill-Castro. 2021. "Explanations from a Robotic Partner Build Trust on the Robot’s Decisions for Collaborative Human-Humanoid Interaction" Robotics 10, no. 1: 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics10010051

APA Style

Javaid, M., & Estivill-Castro, V. (2021). Explanations from a Robotic Partner Build Trust on the Robot’s Decisions for Collaborative Human-Humanoid Interaction. Robotics, 10(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics10010051

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop